ML20127G840

Proposed Tech Spec Tables 3.3-13 & 4.3-13,removing Iodine Sampler Cartridges from Radioactive Gaseous Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation.Util NSHC Determination Encl

ML20127G840
Person / Time
Site:	Beaver Valley
Issue date:	06/17/1985
From:	DUQUESNE LIGHT CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML20127G819	List: ML20127G814 ML20127G827 ML20127G840
References
NUDOCS 8506260109
Download: ML20127G840 (7)

Text

.

Y w

ATTACHMENT A Revise Appendix A as follows:

Remove Pages Insert Pages 3/4 3-60 3/4 3-60 3/4 3-61 3/4 3-61 3/4 3-65 3/4 3-65 3/4 3-66 3/4 3-66 3/4 3-68 3/4 3-68 i

T I

i j

8506260109 850617 PDR ADOCK 05000334 P

PDH i

e

,-c w-e--

c.

-.g

-s. - - +ss,m4

.c-#w

-,_. - -- -~,-

.,3

,,ye-w <.. - -, -. - - - - ~, -.

..,,.,r,

-,w,

,~w*

-w.---

-e

- - -, -, + - -

L TABLE 3.3-13 co RADI0 ACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION IE MINIMUM m

CHANNELS INSTRUMENT OPERABLE APPLICABILITY PARAMETER ACTION I

C5 1.

Gaseous Waste / Process Vent

[

System (RM-GW-108A & B) a.

Noble Gas Activity Monitor (1)

Radioactivity Rate 27, 30 ***

Measurement i

y b.

Particulate Activity Monitor (1) 32 o

OR c.

System Effluent Flow Rate (1)

System Flow Rate 28 0[

Measuring Device (FR-GW-108)

Measurement c

d.

Sampler Flow Rate Measuring (1)

Sampler Flow Rate 28 Device Measurement g

o 2.

Auxiliary Building Ventilation System (RM-VS-101A & B) a.

Noble Gas Activity Monitor (1)

Radioactivity Rate 29, 30 ***

Measurement b.

Particulate Activity Monitor (1) 32 c.

System Effluent Flow Rate (1)

System Flow Rate 28 Measuring Device (FR-VS-101)

Measurement d.

Sampler Flow Rate Measuring (1)

Sampler Flow Rate 28 Device Measurement During Releases via this pathway

• • • During purging of Reactor Containment via this pathway.

TABLE 3.3-13,(Continued)

M 3!

RADI0 ACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION

~ Sa sF m

MINIMUM CHANNELS EE INSTRUMENT OPERABLE APPLICABILITY PARAMETER ACTION

1 n.

3.

Reactor Building / Supplementary Leak Collection and Release System (RM-VS-107A & B)

E Radioactivity Rate 29, 30 ***

?!

a.

Noble Gas Activity Monitor (1)

ES40 l

32 E3*

b.

Particulate Activity Monitor (1) r i' System Flow Rate 28 5S 50 c.

System Effluent Flow Rate (1) 53 Measuring Device (FR-VS-112)

Measurenent 5

Sampler Flow Rate 28 d.

Sampler Flow Rate Measuring (1)

Device Measurement 1

i During Releaes via this pathway During purging of Reactor Containment via this pathway.

...O TABLE 4.3-13 E

.R RADI0 ACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS E!

k CHANNEL G

CHANNEL SOURCE CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL INSTRUMENT CHECK CHECK CALIBRATION TEST I

EQ 1.

Gaseous Waste / Process Vent System (RM-GW-108A & B) a.

Noble Gas Activity Monitor P

P(5)

R(3)

Q(1) b.

Particulate Activity Monitor W

N/A N/A N/A A%

c.

System Effluent Flow Rate P

N/A R

Q 8R Measuring Device (FR-GW-108)

G*

r i' d.

Sampler Flow Rate Measuring Device D*

N/A R

Q S$

e M

2.

Auxiliary Building Ventilation System (RM-VS-101A&B) a.

Noble Gas Activity Monitor D

M(5),

R(3)

Q(2)

P(5)***

g b.

Particulate Activity Monitor W

N/A N/A N/A c.

System Effluent Flow Rate D

N/A R

Q Measurement Device (FR-VS-101) d.

Sampler Flow Rate D

N/A R

Q 3.

Reactor Building / Supplementary Leak Collec-tion and Release System (RM-VS-107A & B) a.

Noble Gas Activity Monitor D

M(5),

R(3)

Q(2)

P(5)***

e. i.

TABLE 4.3-13,(Continued)

RADI0 ACTIVE GASE0US EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS m

5 l

F CHANiiEL 0

CHANNEL SOURCE CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL INSTRUMENT CHECK CHECK CALIBRATION TEST E

m l

b.

Particulate Activity Monitor W

N/A N/A N/A c.

System Effluent Flow Rate D

N/A R

Q Measuring Device (FR.VS-112) d.

Sampler Flow Rate Measuring Device D

N/A R

Q m?

ms y

4.

Waste Gas Decay Tanks Monitor om 5*

a.

Oxygen Monitor D

N/A Q(4)

M y

(0 -AS-GW-110-1,2) 2 b.

Radiation Monitor (RM-GW-101)

D**

M(5)

R(3)

Q(2) c.

Sampler Flow Rate Measuring Device D**

N/A R

Q

G 1

TABLE 4.3-13 (Continued)

TABLE NOTATION (4) The CHANNEL CALIBRATION shall include the use of standard gas samples containing a nominal:

1.

One volume percent oxygen, balance nitrogen, and 2.

Four volume percent oxygen, balance nitrogen (5) A source check may be performed utilizing the installed means or flashing the detector with a portable source to obtain an upscale increase in the existing count rate to verify channel response.

l BEAVER VALLEY - UNIT 1 3/4 3-68 PROPOSED WORDING

16 s'

N ATTACHMENT B Safety Evaluation Proposed Change Request No.113 amends the Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit No.1 Technical Specifications, Appendix A by deleting the iodine sampler cartridge applicable to the radioactive gaseous effluent monitoring instrumen-tation listed in Tables 3.3-13 and 4.3-13.

Description of amendment request:

The proposed amendment would remove the iodine sampler cartridge listed under the radioactive gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation from Tables 3.3-13 and 4.3-13.

Basis for proposed no significant hazards consideration determination:

The Commission has provided guidance concerning the application of standards for determining whether a significant hazards consideration exists by provid-ing certain examples (48 FR 14870).

One of these, example (i), involving no significant hazards consideration is "A purely administrative change to the technical specifications".

The monitors specified in Tables 3.3-13 and 4.3-13.were incorporated into the technical specifications to reflect the requirements specified in the Radiological Effluent Technical Specifications (RETS).

After the RETS were incorporated by Amendment 66, additional iodine sampling and analysis has been installed.

Therefore, the iodine sampler cartridges are being removed from the radioactive gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation of Tables 3.3-13 and 4.3-13 since charcoal filter sampling and analysis is performed by the effluent pathway monitors in accordance with Table 4.11-2, Radioactive Gaseous We3LL Sampling and Analysis Program.

Table 4.3-13 Table Notation Note (6) only applies to the iodine sampler cartridges which are being deleted, there-fore, Note (6) is no longer required and is also being deleted.

Therefore, since the above changes are administrative in nature and match an example for which no significant hazards consideration exists, we propose that this change be characterized as involving no significant hazards consid-eration.

.