ML20129D061: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:.       .       . __. _ _ _ _
{{#Wiki_filter:.
  % *
.
      ..
. __. _ _ _
  $                                                                                                           $
_
                                                                                                                  !
%
*
..
$
$
i
i
!                                                         October 18, 1996
!
October 18, 1996
:
:
<
<
              Mr. Leon R. Eliason
Mr. Leon R. Eliason
President and Chief Nuclear Officer
4
4
              President and Chief Nuclear Officer
Nuclear Business Unit
              Nuclear Business Unit
Public Service Electric and Gas Company
,
Post Office Box 236
Hancocks Bridge, NJ 08038
j
SUBJECT: NRC INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT 50-354/96-07
l
NOTICE OF VIOLATION
,
,
              Public Service Electric and Gas Company
              Post Office Box 236                                                                                i
              Hancocks Bridge, NJ 08038                                                                          i
j            SUBJECT: NRC INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT 50-354/96-07                                              l
                          NOTICE OF VIOLATION                                                                    ,
                                                                                                                  I
4
4
              Dear Mr. Eliason-                                                                                   I
Dear Mr. Eliason-
                                                                                                                  l
l
On September 21,1996, the NRC completed an inspection at your Hope Creek reactor
i
i
              On September 21,1996, the NRC completed an inspection at your Hope Creek reactor
facility. The enclosed report presents the results of that inspection. In addition to the
              facility. The enclosed report presents the results of that inspection. In addition to the
normal resident inspector findings that are described in the enclosed report, several
              normal resident inspector findings that are described in the enclosed report, several
!
!
specialist inspections were conducted during the inspection period, the results of which are
'
'
              specialist inspections were conducted during the inspection period, the results of which are
also enclosed, including: a region-based inspections of emergency preparedness and
              also enclosed, including: a region-based inspections of emergency preparedness and
)
)             follow up of prior inspection findings; and, an inspection of the 50.59 process by the
follow up of prior inspection findings; and, an inspection of the 50.59 process by the
              Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Hope Creek project manager.
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Hope Creek project manager.
,
,
              During the 7-week period covered by this inspection period, your conduct of activities at
During the 7-week period covered by this inspection period, your conduct of activities at
              the Hope Creek facility was generally characterized by safety-conscious operations, sound
the Hope Creek facility was generally characterized by safety-conscious operations, sound
              engineering and maintenance practices, and careful radiological work controls. Uneventful
engineering and maintenance practices, and careful radiological work controls. Uneventful
              operations has continued since unit restart in March 1996. The recent initiative to have
operations has continued since unit restart in March 1996. The recent initiative to have
              SORC review operability determinations continued to be viewed as a positive effort.
SORC review operability determinations continued to be viewed as a positive effort.
              Performance of maintenance was good; however, two personnel errors during testing
Performance of maintenance was good; however, two personnel errors during testing
              activities occurred. Better work week schedule adherence was noted during this
activities occurred. Better work week schedule adherence was noted during this
              inspection period, which is an improvement over previous performance. However,                     ,
inspection period, which is an improvement over previous performance. However,
              corrective maintenance backlogs continued to be high, and we are concerned that the
,
              aggregate affect of the backlogged work does not hinder safe operations. Generally good
corrective maintenance backlogs continued to be high, and we are concerned that the
              performance was noted in radiation protection, fire protection and emergency preparedness
aggregate affect of the backlogged work does not hinder safe operations. Generally good
              activities. However, several problems occurred during the inspection involving physical           ,
performance was noted in radiation protection, fire protection and emergency preparedness
                                                                                                                '
activities. However, several problems occurred during the inspection involving physical
              protection activities. The NRC conducted a separate specialinspection of these issues,
,
              details of which are contained in NRC Inspection Report 50-272/96-14, 50-311/96-14 and
'
              50-354/96-08.
protection activities. The NRC conducted a separate specialinspection of these issues,
              We reviewed your 50.59 safety evaluation program and found it to be generally good.
details of which are contained in NRC Inspection Report 50-272/96-14, 50-311/96-14 and
              However, several activities were noted during the inspection period that indicated poor
50-354/96-08.
            ' implementation of this program and resulted in two violations of NRC requirements, in the
We reviewed your 50.59 safety evaluation program and found it to be generally good.
              first instance, inadequate safety evaluations for design changes to the plant were noted.       4\
However, several activities were noted during the inspection period that indicated poor
              in the second instance, the technical specification required reviews of design change
' implementation of this program and resulted in two violations of NRC requirements, in the 4\\
              safety evaluations by the Offsite Safety Review group were not always being performed.
first instance, inadequate safety evaluations for design changes to the plant were noted.
                                                                                                          ' \
in the second instance, the technical specification required reviews of design change
                                              *                                                           '
safety evaluations by the Offsite Safety Review group were not always being performed.
          9610240189 961018
' \\
          PDR     ADOCK 05000354
'
          G                     PDR
*
                                                                    --_
9610240189 961018
PDR
ADOCK 05000354
G
PDR
--_


*
*
                      .
.
  .                     .
.
        *
.
.
*
                          Mr. L. Eliason                               2
.
                          These violations are cited in the enclosed Notice of Violation, and the circumstances
Mr. L. Eliason
                          surrounding the violations are described in detailin the enclosed report. Please note that
2
                          you are required to respond to this !etter and should follow the instructions specified in the
These violations are cited in the enclosed Notice of Violation, and the circumstances
                          enclosed Notice when preparing your response. The NRC will use your response, in part,
surrounding the violations are described in detailin the enclosed report. Please note that
                          to determine whether further enforcement action is necessary to ensure compliance with
you are required to respond to this !etter and should follow the instructions specified in the
                          regulatory requirements.
enclosed Notice when preparing your response. The NRC will use your response, in part,
                          In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter
to determine whether further enforcement action is necessary to ensure compliance with
                          and its enclosures will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room (PDR).
regulatory requirements.
                                                                      Sincerely,
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter
                                                                      ORIGINAL SIGNED BY:
and its enclosures will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room (PDR).
                                                                      Larry E. Nicholson, Chief
Sincerely,
                                                                      Projects Branch 3
ORIGINAL SIGNED BY:
                                                                      Division of Reactor Projects
Larry E. Nicholson, Chief
                          Docket No.: 50-354
Projects Branch 3
                          License No: NPF-57
Division of Reactor Projects
                          Enclosures:     Notice of Violation
Docket No.: 50-354
                                          Inspection Report 50-354/96-07
License No: NPF-57
                          cc w/ encl:
Enclosures:
                          L. Storz, Senior Vice President - Nuclear Operations
Notice of Violation
                          E. Simpson, Senior Vice President - Nuclear Engineering
Inspection Report 50-354/96-07
                          E. Salowitz, Director - Nuclear Business Support
cc w/ encl:
                          C. Schaefer, External Operations - Nuclear, Delmarva Power & Light Co.
L. Storz, Senior Vice President - Nuclear Operations
                          P. MacFarland Goelz, Manager, Joint Generation
E. Simpson, Senior Vice President - Nuclear Engineering
                            Atlantic Electric
E. Salowitz, Director - Nuclear Business Support
                          M. Bezilla, General Manager - Hope Creek Operations
C. Schaefer, External Operations - Nuclear, Delmarva Power & Light Co.
                          J. Benjamin, Director - Quality Assurance & Nuclear Safety Review
P. MacFarland Goelz, Manager, Joint Generation
                          D. Powell, Manager - Licensing and Regulation
Atlantic Electric
                          R. Kankus, Joint Owner Affairs
M. Bezilla, General Manager - Hope Creek Operations
                          A. C. Tapert, Program Administrator
J. Benjamin, Director - Quality Assurance & Nuclear Safety Review
                          R. Fryling, Jr., Esquire
D. Powell, Manager - Licensing and Regulation
                            M. J. Wetterhahn, Esquire
R. Kankus, Joint Owner Affairs
                          Consumer Advocate, Office of Consumer Advocate
A. C. Tapert, Program Administrator
                          William Conklin, Public Safety Consultant, Lower Alloways Creek Township
R. Fryling, Jr., Esquire
                            State of New Jersey
M. J. Wetterhahn, Esquire
                            State of Delaware
Consumer Advocate, Office of Consumer Advocate
_- . _ _ - _ - - . _ -                 _      .-
William Conklin, Public Safety Consultant, Lower Alloways Creek Township
State of New Jersey
State of Delaware
- .
-
- - .
-
.-


                                                                                                                            _.             -
.
                            .                                        _
_
  =
_.
        .,
-
  d
=
  .
.,
                                                                                      3
d
                    Distribution w/ encl:
.
                    Region I Docket Room (with concurrences)
3
                    K. Gallagher
Distribution w/ encl:
                    D. Screnci, PAO
Region I Docket Room (with concurrences)
                    Nuclear Safety information Center (NSIC)
K. Gallagher
                    NRC Resident inspector
D. Screnci, PAO
                    PUBLIC
Nuclear Safety information Center (NSIC)
                    Distribution w/ encl: (Via E-Mail)
NRC Resident inspector
                  W. Dean, OEDO
PUBLIC
                    D. Jaffe, Project Manager, NRR
Distribution w/ encl: (Via E-Mail)
                  J. Stolz, PDI-2, NRR
W. Dean, OEDO
                    inspection Program Branch, NRR (IPAS)
D. Jaffe, Project Manager, NRR
                    R. Correia, NRR
J. Stolz, PDI-2, NRR
                    R. Frahm, Jr., NRR
inspection Program Branch, NRR (IPAS)
                                                                                                                                                              1
R. Correia, NRR
                                                                                                                                                              1
R. Frahm, Jr., NRR
                                                                                                                                                              j
j
                                                                                                                                                              !
r
                                                              r
,
                                                            ,
/
                                                            /
,
                                                          ,
DOCUMENT NAME: a:9607.rev
                                                                                                                                                              l
Te ne.sv. . copy of thi. docurrwent. indic.i. in th. box: c - copy without ttachment/ enclosure
    DOCUMENT NAME: a:9607.rev                                                                                                                               l
"E' = Copy with attachment / enclosure
    Te ne.sv. . copy of thi. docurrwent. indic.i. in th. box: c - copy without ttachment/ enclosure "E' = Copy with attachment / enclosure   *N' = No copy
*N' = No copy
      OFFICE         Rl:DRP,/ /
OFFICE
      NAME           LNicp6!sbfi
Rl:DRP,/ /
      DATE           10/p/96
NAME
                                                                      OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
LNicp6!sbfi
DATE
10/p/96
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
l
l
                                                                                                                                                          50/
50/
-
- -
- - .
.-
.
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 11:50, 12 December 2024

Forwards Insp Rept 50-354/96-07 on 960804-0921 & NOV
ML20129D061
Person / Time
Site: Hope Creek PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 10/18/1996
From: Larry Nicholson
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To: Eliason L
Public Service Enterprise Group
Shared Package
ML20129D067 List:
References
NUDOCS 9610240189
Download: ML20129D061 (3)


See also: IR 05000354/1996007

Text

.

.

. __. _ _ _

_

%

..

$

$

i

!

October 18, 1996

<

Mr. Leon R. Eliason

President and Chief Nuclear Officer

4

Nuclear Business Unit

Public Service Electric and Gas Company

,

Post Office Box 236

Hancocks Bridge, NJ 08038

j

SUBJECT: NRC INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT 50-354/96-07

l

NOTICE OF VIOLATION

,

4

Dear Mr. Eliason-

l

On September 21,1996, the NRC completed an inspection at your Hope Creek reactor

i

facility. The enclosed report presents the results of that inspection. In addition to the

normal resident inspector findings that are described in the enclosed report, several

!

specialist inspections were conducted during the inspection period, the results of which are

'

also enclosed, including: a region-based inspections of emergency preparedness and

)

follow up of prior inspection findings; and, an inspection of the 50.59 process by the

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Hope Creek project manager.

,

During the 7-week period covered by this inspection period, your conduct of activities at

the Hope Creek facility was generally characterized by safety-conscious operations, sound

engineering and maintenance practices, and careful radiological work controls. Uneventful

operations has continued since unit restart in March 1996. The recent initiative to have

SORC review operability determinations continued to be viewed as a positive effort.

Performance of maintenance was good; however, two personnel errors during testing

activities occurred. Better work week schedule adherence was noted during this

inspection period, which is an improvement over previous performance. However,

,

corrective maintenance backlogs continued to be high, and we are concerned that the

aggregate affect of the backlogged work does not hinder safe operations. Generally good

performance was noted in radiation protection, fire protection and emergency preparedness

activities. However, several problems occurred during the inspection involving physical

,

'

protection activities. The NRC conducted a separate specialinspection of these issues,

details of which are contained in NRC Inspection Report 50-272/96-14, 50-311/96-14 and

50-354/96-08.

We reviewed your 50.59 safety evaluation program and found it to be generally good.

However, several activities were noted during the inspection period that indicated poor

' implementation of this program and resulted in two violations of NRC requirements, in the 4\\

first instance, inadequate safety evaluations for design changes to the plant were noted.

in the second instance, the technical specification required reviews of design change

safety evaluations by the Offsite Safety Review group were not always being performed.

' \\

'

9610240189 961018

PDR

ADOCK 05000354

G

PDR

--_

.

.

.

.

Mr. L. Eliason

2

These violations are cited in the enclosed Notice of Violation, and the circumstances

surrounding the violations are described in detailin the enclosed report. Please note that

you are required to respond to this !etter and should follow the instructions specified in the

enclosed Notice when preparing your response. The NRC will use your response, in part,

to determine whether further enforcement action is necessary to ensure compliance with

regulatory requirements.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter

and its enclosures will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room (PDR).

Sincerely,

ORIGINAL SIGNED BY:

Larry E. Nicholson, Chief

Projects Branch 3

Division of Reactor Projects

Docket No.: 50-354

License No: NPF-57

Enclosures:

Notice of Violation

Inspection Report 50-354/96-07

cc w/ encl:

L. Storz, Senior Vice President - Nuclear Operations

E. Simpson, Senior Vice President - Nuclear Engineering

E. Salowitz, Director - Nuclear Business Support

C. Schaefer, External Operations - Nuclear, Delmarva Power & Light Co.

P. MacFarland Goelz, Manager, Joint Generation

Atlantic Electric

M. Bezilla, General Manager - Hope Creek Operations

J. Benjamin, Director - Quality Assurance & Nuclear Safety Review

D. Powell, Manager - Licensing and Regulation

R. Kankus, Joint Owner Affairs

A. C. Tapert, Program Administrator

R. Fryling, Jr., Esquire

M. J. Wetterhahn, Esquire

Consumer Advocate, Office of Consumer Advocate

William Conklin, Public Safety Consultant, Lower Alloways Creek Township

State of New Jersey

State of Delaware

- .

-

- - .

-

.-

.

_

_.

-

=

.,

d

.

3

Distribution w/ encl:

Region I Docket Room (with concurrences)

K. Gallagher

D. Screnci, PAO

Nuclear Safety information Center (NSIC)

NRC Resident inspector

PUBLIC

Distribution w/ encl: (Via E-Mail)

W. Dean, OEDO

D. Jaffe, Project Manager, NRR

J. Stolz, PDI-2, NRR

inspection Program Branch, NRR (IPAS)

R. Correia, NRR

R. Frahm, Jr., NRR

j

r

,

/

,

DOCUMENT NAME: a:9607.rev

Te ne.sv. . copy of thi. docurrwent. indic.i. in th. box: c - copy without ttachment/ enclosure

"E' = Copy with attachment / enclosure

  • N' = No copy

OFFICE

Rl:DRP,/ /

NAME

LNicp6!sbfi

DATE

10/p/96

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

l

50/

-

- -

- - .

.-

.