ML20132C683: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
VisualWikitext
StriderTol Bot insert
 
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:.__   ._   _ _ _ _ _ _ _                             _-
{{#Wiki_filter:.__
. .
._
                                                                        SEP 19 1985
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
      Docket No. 50-254
_-
      Docket No. 50-265
.
      Commonwealth Edison Company
.
      ATTN:   Mr. Cordell Reed
SEP 19 1985
              Vice President
Docket No. 50-254
      Post Office Box 767
Docket No. 50-265
      Chicago, IL 60690
Commonwealth Edison Company
      Gentlemen:
ATTN:
      This refers to the routine safety inspection conducted by Mr. G. Brown and
Mr. Cordell Reed
      others of this office on August 26-28, 1985, of activities at the Quad Cities
Vice President
      Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1 and 2, authorized by NRC Operating
Post Office Box 767
      Licenses No. DPR-29 and DPR-30, and to the discussion of our findings with
Chicago, IL 60690
      Mr. N. Kalivianakis and others of your staff at the conclusion of the inspection.
Gentlemen:
      The enclosed copy of our inspection report identifies areas examined during
This refers to the routine safety inspection conducted by Mr. G. Brown and
      the inspection. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of a selective
others of this office on August 26-28, 1985, of activities at the Quad Cities
      examination of procedures and representative records, observations, and                   j
Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1 and 2, authorized by NRC Operating
      interviews with personnel.
Licenses No. DPR-29 and DPR-30, and to the discussion of our findings with
      No items of noncompliance with NRC requirements were identified during the
Mr. N. Kalivianakis and others of your staff at the conclusion of the inspection.
      course of this inspection.
The enclosed copy of our inspection report identifies areas examined during
      However, during this emergency preparedness exercise inspection, certain
the inspection.
      weaknesses were identified which will require corrective actions. These
Within these areas, the inspection consisted of a selective
      weaknesses are identified in the appendix to this letter. As required by
examination of procedures and representative records, observations, and
      10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E (IV.F), any weaknesses that are identified must be
j
      corrected. Accordingly, you are requested to submit a written statement
interviews with personnel.
      within 30 days of the date of this letter describing your planned actions for
No items of noncompliance with NRC requirements were identified during the
      correcting the weaknesses identified in the appendix.
course of this inspection.
      In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of
However, during this emergency preparedness exercise inspection, certain
      this letter, the enclosures, and your response to this letter will be placed
weaknesses were identified which will require corrective actions.
      in the NRC's Public Document Room.
These
      The responses directed by this letter are not subject to the clearance
weaknesses are identified in the appendix to this letter.
      procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as required by the Paperwork
As required by
      Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.
10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E (IV.F), any weaknesses that are identified must be
                                                                                          \ oeNh
corrected. Accordingly, you are requested to submit a written statement
                                                                                    />O"
within 30 days of the date of this letter describing your planned actions for
    8509270115 850919
correcting the weaknesses identified in the appendix.
    PDR
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of
    G
this letter, the enclosures, and your response to this letter will be placed
            ADOCK 05000254
in the NRC's Public Document Room.
                        PDR
The responses directed by this letter are not subject to the clearance
                                                                                      f
procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as required by the Paperwork
                              -                    _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _
Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.
/>O"
\\ o Nh
e
f
8509270115 850919
PDR
ADOCK 05000254
G
PDR
-
_ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _


                                    -_   .                                           _ _ _ _ _
-_
  . .
.
        Commonwealth Edison Company                 2
_ _ _ _ _
                                                        SEP 1 9 FA5
.
        We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.
.
                                                    Sincerely,
Commonwealth Edison Company
                                            ' Original signed by W.D. Shafer"
2
                                                    W. D. Shafer, Chief
SEP 1 9 FA5
                                                    Emergency Preparedness and
We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.
                                                      Radiological Protection Branch
Sincerely,
        Enclosures:
' Original signed by W.D. Shafer"
        1.   Appendix, Exercise Weaknesses
W. D. Shafer, Chief
        2. Inspection Reports
Emergency Preparedness and
              No. 50-254/85015(DRSS); and
Radiological Protection Branch
              No. 50-265/85017(DRSS)
Enclosures:
        cc w/ enclosures:
1.
        D. L. Farrar, Director
Appendix, Exercise Weaknesses
          of Nuclear Licensing
2.
        N. Kalivianakis, Plant Manager
Inspection Reports
        DCS/RSB (RIDS)
No. 50-254/85015(DRSS); and
        Licensing Fee Management Branch
No. 50-265/85017(DRSS)
        Resident Inspector, RIII
cc w/ enclosures:
        Phyllis Dunton, Attorney
D. L. Farrar, Director
          General's Office, Environmental
of Nuclear Licensing
          Control Division
N. Kalivianakis, Plant Manager
        D. Matt. hews, EPB, OIE
DCS/RSB (RIDS)
      W. Weaver, FEMA, RV
Licensing Fee Management Branch
      M. Carroll, FEMA, RVII
Resident Inspector, RIII
                                                                                            r
Phyllis Dunton, Attorney
        h
General's Office, Environmental
Control Division
D. Matt. hews, EPB, OIE
W. Weaver, FEMA, RV
M. Carroll, FEMA, RVII
r
h
'
'
RIII
II
III
RII
&
QII RIbI
;
ano
c
'
'
      &
Ploski
      / Brown /ld      QII RIbI  Ploski
h
                                              c
n lips
                                              RIII
Wri gfit.
                                                    h
S
                                                          ;
/ Brown /ld
                                                            II
'
                                                            n lips
09/12/85
                                                                          III
-
                                                                          ano
- -
                                                                            '
.
                                                                        Wri gfit.
.
                                                                                  RII
.
                                                                                  S
        09/12/85


. .
.
                                                                                  j
.
                                        APPENDIX
j
                                    EXERCISE WEAKNESSES
APPENDIX
    1. Some workers were not adequately instructed on proper radiological
EXERCISE WEAKNESSES
      protection methods. (Paragraph 5.c) (254/85015-02; 265/85017-02)
1.
    2. Initial offsite Protective Action Recommendations (PAR) associated with
Some workers were not adequately instructed on proper radiological
      the Site Area Emergency and General Emergency declarations were inadequate.
protection methods.
      Errors were made in either formulating, reviewing, documenting or
(Paragraph 5.c)
      communicating the PARS.     (Paragraph 5.e) (254/85015-04; 265/85017-04)
(254/85015-02; 265/85017-02)
    3. Information disseminated by the JPIC was inaccurate and inadequate.
2.
      (Paragraph 5.f) (254/85015-05; 265/85017-05)
Initial offsite Protective Action Recommendations (PAR) associated with
                                                                                  ;
the Site Area Emergency and General Emergency declarations were inadequate.
Errors were made in either formulating, reviewing, documenting or
communicating the PARS.
(Paragraph 5.e) (254/85015-04; 265/85017-04)
3.
Information disseminated by the JPIC was inaccurate and inadequate.
(Paragraph 5.f)
(254/85015-05; 265/85017-05)
- -
-
-
-
-
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 11:09, 12 December 2024

Forwards Safety Insp Repts 50-254/85-15 & 50-265/85-17 on 850826-28.No Noncompliance Noted.Weaknesses Identified During Emergency Preparedness Exercise Insp,Including Improper Instruction in Proper Protection Methods
ML20132C683
Person / Time
Site: Quad Cities  
Issue date: 09/19/1985
From: Shafer W
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Reed C
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
Shared Package
ML20132C687 List:
References
NUDOCS 8509270115
Download: ML20132C683 (3)
v • d • e


See also: IR 05000254/1985015

Text

.__

._

_ _ _ _ _ _ _

_-

.

.

SEP 19 1985

Docket No. 50-254

Docket No. 50-265

Commonwealth Edison Company

ATTN:

Mr. Cordell Reed

Vice President

Post Office Box 767

Chicago, IL 60690

Gentlemen:

This refers to the routine safety inspection conducted by Mr. G. Brown and

others of this office on August 26-28, 1985, of activities at the Quad Cities

Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1 and 2, authorized by NRC Operating

Licenses No. DPR-29 and DPR-30, and to the discussion of our findings with

Mr. N. Kalivianakis and others of your staff at the conclusion of the inspection.

The enclosed copy of our inspection report identifies areas examined during

the inspection.

Within these areas, the inspection consisted of a selective

examination of procedures and representative records, observations, and

j

interviews with personnel.

No items of noncompliance with NRC requirements were identified during the

course of this inspection.

However, during this emergency preparedness exercise inspection, certain

weaknesses were identified which will require corrective actions.

These

weaknesses are identified in the appendix to this letter.

As required by

10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E (IV.F), any weaknesses that are identified must be

corrected. Accordingly, you are requested to submit a written statement

within 30 days of the date of this letter describing your planned actions for

correcting the weaknesses identified in the appendix.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of

this letter, the enclosures, and your response to this letter will be placed

in the NRC's Public Document Room.

The responses directed by this letter are not subject to the clearance

procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as required by the Paperwork

Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.

/>O"

\\ o Nh

e

f

8509270115 850919

PDR

ADOCK 05000254

G

PDR

-

_ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _

-_

.

_ _ _ _ _

.

.

Commonwealth Edison Company

2

SEP 1 9 FA5

We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.

Sincerely,

' Original signed by W.D. Shafer"

W. D. Shafer, Chief

Emergency Preparedness and

Radiological Protection Branch

Enclosures:

1.

Appendix, Exercise Weaknesses

2.

Inspection Reports

No. 50-254/85015(DRSS); and

No. 50-265/85017(DRSS)

cc w/ enclosures:

D. L. Farrar, Director

of Nuclear Licensing

N. Kalivianakis, Plant Manager

DCS/RSB (RIDS)

Licensing Fee Management Branch

Resident Inspector, RIII

Phyllis Dunton, Attorney

General's Office, Environmental

Control Division

D. Matt. hews, EPB, OIE

W. Weaver, FEMA, RV

M. Carroll, FEMA, RVII

r

h

'

RIII

II

III

RII

&

QII RIbI

ano

c

'

Ploski

h

n lips

Wri gfit.

S

/ Brown /ld

'

09/12/85

-

- -

.

.

.

.

.

j

APPENDIX

EXERCISE WEAKNESSES

1.

Some workers were not adequately instructed on proper radiological

protection methods.

(Paragraph 5.c)

(254/85015-02; 265/85017-02)

2.

Initial offsite Protective Action Recommendations (PAR) associated with

the Site Area Emergency and General Emergency declarations were inadequate.

Errors were made in either formulating, reviewing, documenting or

communicating the PARS.

(Paragraph 5.e) (254/85015-04; 265/85017-04)

3.

Information disseminated by the JPIC was inaccurate and inadequate.

(Paragraph 5.f)

(254/85015-05; 265/85017-05)

- -

-

-

-

-

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20132C683&oldid=4246872"