ML20132C683
| ML20132C683 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Quad Cities  |
| Issue date: | 09/19/1985 |
| From: | Shafer W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Reed C COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20132C687 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8509270115 | |
| Download: ML20132C683 (3) | |
See also: IR 05000254/1985015
Text
.__
._
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
_-
.
.
SEP 19 1985
Docket No. 50-254
Docket No. 50-265
Commonwealth Edison Company
ATTN:
Mr. Cordell Reed
Vice President
Post Office Box 767
Chicago, IL 60690
Gentlemen:
This refers to the routine safety inspection conducted by Mr. G. Brown and
others of this office on August 26-28, 1985, of activities at the Quad Cities
Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1 and 2, authorized by NRC Operating
Licenses No. DPR-29 and DPR-30, and to the discussion of our findings with
Mr. N. Kalivianakis and others of your staff at the conclusion of the inspection.
The enclosed copy of our inspection report identifies areas examined during
the inspection.
Within these areas, the inspection consisted of a selective
examination of procedures and representative records, observations, and
j
interviews with personnel.
No items of noncompliance with NRC requirements were identified during the
course of this inspection.
However, during this emergency preparedness exercise inspection, certain
weaknesses were identified which will require corrective actions.
These
weaknesses are identified in the appendix to this letter.
As required by
10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E (IV.F), any weaknesses that are identified must be
corrected. Accordingly, you are requested to submit a written statement
within 30 days of the date of this letter describing your planned actions for
correcting the weaknesses identified in the appendix.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of
this letter, the enclosures, and your response to this letter will be placed
in the NRC's Public Document Room.
The responses directed by this letter are not subject to the clearance
procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.
/>O"
\\ o Nh
e
f
8509270115 850919
ADOCK 05000254
G
-
_ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _
-_
.
_ _ _ _ _
.
.
Commonwealth Edison Company
2
SEP 1 9 FA5
We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.
Sincerely,
' Original signed by W.D. Shafer"
W. D. Shafer, Chief
Radiological Protection Branch
Enclosures:
1.
Appendix, Exercise Weaknesses
2.
Inspection Reports
No. 50-254/85015(DRSS); and
No. 50-265/85017(DRSS)
cc w/ enclosures:
D. L. Farrar, Director
of Nuclear Licensing
N. Kalivianakis, Plant Manager
DCS/RSB (RIDS)
Licensing Fee Management Branch
Resident Inspector, RIII
Phyllis Dunton, Attorney
General's Office, Environmental
Control Division
D. Matt. hews, EPB, OIE
W. Weaver, FEMA, RV
M. Carroll, FEMA, RVII
r
h
'
RIII
II
III
RII
&
QII RIbI
ano
c
'
Ploski
h
n lips
Wri gfit.
S
/ Brown /ld
'
09/12/85
-
- -
.
.
.
.
.
j
APPENDIX
EXERCISE WEAKNESSES
1.
Some workers were not adequately instructed on proper radiological
protection methods.
(Paragraph 5.c)
(254/85015-02; 265/85017-02)
2.
Initial offsite Protective Action Recommendations (PAR) associated with
the Site Area Emergency and General Emergency declarations were inadequate.
Errors were made in either formulating, reviewing, documenting or
communicating the PARS.
(Paragraph 5.e) (254/85015-04; 265/85017-04)
3.
Information disseminated by the JPIC was inaccurate and inadequate.
(Paragraph 5.f)
(254/85015-05; 265/85017-05)
- -
-
-
-
-