ML20140J478: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
StriderTol Bot insert
 
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 20: Line 20:
{{#Wiki_filter:~-
{{#Wiki_filter:~-
*y O
*y O
    e
e
  ...                               MAR 2 71996
MAR 2 71996
      Docket / License:     50-213/DPR-61
...
      Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company
Docket / License:
      ATTN:       Mr. J. F. Opeka
50-213/DPR-61
                  Senior Vice Pre.ident - Nuclear
Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company
                  Engineering and toerations
ATTN:
      P. O. Box 270
Mr. J. F. Opeka
  .  Hartford, Connecticut 061t1
Senior Vice Pre.ident - Nuclear
      Gentlemen:
Engineering and toerations
      Subject:   Resident Inspection 50-213/86-01 (1/9/86 - 2/10/86)
P. O. Box 270
      .This transmits the findings of the routine NRC inspection of refueling and main-
Hartford, Connecticut
      tenance outage activities at the Haddam Neck Plant.       These findings have been dis-
061t1
      cussed with Mr. R. Graves of your staff.
.
      The inspection identified Violations related to the administrative control of on .
Gentlemen:
      going plant modifications. Please reply to these matters in accordance with the
Subject:
      enclosed Appendix A.
Resident Inspection 50-213/86-01 (1/9/86 - 2/10/86)
      We are concerned that the root cause of the enclosed violations may be inadequate
.This transmits the findings of the routine NRC inspection of refueling and main-
      training 'of engineering and construction personnel in the control of requirements
tenance outage activities at the Haddam Neck Plant.
      for implementation of plant modifications. Such a weakness was cited by you as
These findings have been dis-
      a causal factor for design change control problems exper_ienced at Haddam Neck dur-
cussed with Mr. R. Graves of your staff.
      ing the period 1979-1984. Consequently, in your response to Appendix A, please
The inspection identified Violations related to the administrative control of on .
      address the effectiveness of your corrective actions for previous design control
going plant modifications.
      problems in relation to the present training and qualification of personnel.
Please reply to these matters in accordance with the
      Detail 5.2 of the enclosed inspection report notes that four tubes in a steam
enclosed Appendix A.
      generator were not eddy current tested. We understand that you plan to justify
We are concerned that the root cause of the enclosed violations may be inadequate
      and request a one-time relief from Technical Specification requirements for eddy
training 'of engineering and construction personnel in the control of requirements
      current testing of these tubes and that your submittal concerning such relief has
for implementation of plant modifications.
      been on hold within your organization. Because this relief is needed to resume
Such a weakness was cited by you as
      operations, we recommend that any such submittal be made as soon as practicable.
a causal factor for design change control problems exper_ienced at Haddam Neck dur-
                ~
ing the period 1979-1984.
      Your cooperation with us is appreciated.
Consequently, in your response to Appendix A, please
                                                  Sincerely,
address the effectiveness of your corrective actions for previous design control
                                                Crisim A Signed By:
problems in relation to the present training and qualification of personnel.
                                                  Edward C. Wenzinger, Chief
Detail 5.2 of the enclosed inspection report notes that four tubes in a steam
                                                  Projects Branch No. 3
generator were not eddy current tested. We understand that you plan to justify
                                                  Division of Reactor Projects
and request a one-time relief from Technical Specification requirements for eddy
      Enclosures:
current testing of these tubes and that your submittal concerning such relief has
      1.     Appendix A, Notice of Violation
been on hold within your organization.
      2.     NRC Region I Report 50-213/86-01
Because this relief is needed to resume
                                $
operations, we recommend that any such submittal be made as soon as practicable.
                                                                                              l
~
Your cooperation with us is appreciated.
Sincerely,
Crisim A Signed By:
Edward C. Wenzinger, Chief
Projects Branch No. 3
Division of Reactor Projects
Enclosures:
1.
Appendix A, Notice of Violation
2.
NRC Region I Report 50-213/86-01
$
l


~: .
~:
    * .':
* .':
  -
.
            Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company 2               IIAR 2 7 M
Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company 2
            cc w/encis:
IIAR 2 7 M
            R. Graves, Plant Superintendent
-
            D. O. Nordquist, Manager of Quality Assurance
cc w/encis:
            R. T. Laudenat, Manager, Generation Facilities Licensir.g
R. Graves, Plant Superintendent
            E. J. Mroczka, .Vice President, Nuclear Operations
D. O. Nordquist, Manager of Quality Assurance
            Gerald Garfield, Esquire
R. T. Laudenat, Manager, Generation Facilities Licensir.g
            Public Document Room (PDR)
E. J. Mroczka, .Vice President, Nuclear Operations
            Local Public Document Room (LPDR)
Gerald Garfield, Esquire
            Nuclear Safety Information Center (NSIC)
Public Document Room (PDR)
            NRC Resident Inspector
Local Public Document Room (LPDR)
            State of Connecticut
Nuclear Safety Information Center (NSIC)
            bcc w/encls:
NRC Resident Inspector
            Region I Docket Room
State of Connecticut
            DRP Section Chief
bcc w/encls:
            M. McBride,'RI, Pilgrim
Region I Docket Room
            J. Shediosky, SRI, Millstone 1 & 2
DRP Section Chief
            T. Rebelowski, SRI, Millstone 3
M. McBride,'RI, Pilgrim
            F. Akstulewicz, LPM, NRR
J. Shediosky, SRI, Millstone 1 & 2
              w e-
T. Rebelowski, SRI, Millstone 3
          p.RI:DRP           p.#
F. Akstulewicz, LPM, NRR
                            RI:DRP         RI   P             P
p. w -
            P   a e/meo     S   and       McCabe         We zi ger
p.#
            3/ /86           3/ t F/f6       gh<[
e
                                          OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
RI:DRP
RI:DRP
RI
P
P
P
a e/meo
S
and
McCabe
We zi ger
3/ /86
3/ t F/f6
gh<[
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 17:09, 11 December 2024

Forwards Insp Rept 50-213/86-01 on 860109-0210 & Notice of Violation.Root Cause of Violations May Be Inadequate Training of Engineering & Const Personnel.Discussion of Corrective Actions for Previous Design Problems Requested
ML20140J478
Person / Time
Site: Haddam Neck File:Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co icon.png
Issue date: 03/27/1986
From: Wenzinger E
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To: Opeka J
CONNECTICUT YANKEE ATOMIC POWER CO.
Shared Package
ML20140J482 List:
References
NUDOCS 8604040342
Download: ML20140J478 (2)


See also: IR 05000213/1986001

Text

~-

  • y O

e

MAR 2 71996

...

Docket / License:

50-213/DPR-61

Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company

ATTN:

Mr. J. F. Opeka

Senior Vice Pre.ident - Nuclear

Engineering and toerations

P. O. Box 270

Hartford, Connecticut

061t1

.

Gentlemen:

Subject:

Resident Inspection 50-213/86-01 (1/9/86 - 2/10/86)

.This transmits the findings of the routine NRC inspection of refueling and main-

tenance outage activities at the Haddam Neck Plant.

These findings have been dis-

cussed with Mr. R. Graves of your staff.

The inspection identified Violations related to the administrative control of on .

going plant modifications.

Please reply to these matters in accordance with the

enclosed Appendix A.

We are concerned that the root cause of the enclosed violations may be inadequate

training 'of engineering and construction personnel in the control of requirements

for implementation of plant modifications.

Such a weakness was cited by you as

a causal factor for design change control problems exper_ienced at Haddam Neck dur-

ing the period 1979-1984.

Consequently, in your response to Appendix A, please

address the effectiveness of your corrective actions for previous design control

problems in relation to the present training and qualification of personnel.

Detail 5.2 of the enclosed inspection report notes that four tubes in a steam

generator were not eddy current tested. We understand that you plan to justify

and request a one-time relief from Technical Specification requirements for eddy

current testing of these tubes and that your submittal concerning such relief has

been on hold within your organization.

Because this relief is needed to resume

operations, we recommend that any such submittal be made as soon as practicable.

~

Your cooperation with us is appreciated.

Sincerely,

Crisim A Signed By:

Edward C. Wenzinger, Chief

Projects Branch No. 3

Division of Reactor Projects

Enclosures:

1.

Appendix A, Notice of Violation

2.

NRC Region I Report 50-213/86-01

$

l

~:

  • .':

.

Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company 2

IIAR 2 7 M

-

cc w/encis:

R. Graves, Plant Superintendent

D. O. Nordquist, Manager of Quality Assurance

R. T. Laudenat, Manager, Generation Facilities Licensir.g

E. J. Mroczka, .Vice President, Nuclear Operations

Gerald Garfield, Esquire

Public Document Room (PDR)

Local Public Document Room (LPDR)

Nuclear Safety Information Center (NSIC)

NRC Resident Inspector

State of Connecticut

bcc w/encls:

Region I Docket Room

DRP Section Chief

M. McBride,'RI, Pilgrim

J. Shediosky, SRI, Millstone 1 & 2

T. Rebelowski, SRI, Millstone 3

F. Akstulewicz, LPM, NRR

p. w -

p.#

e

RI:DRP

RI:DRP

RI

P

P

P

a e/meo

S

and

McCabe

We zi ger

3/ /86

3/ t F/f6

gh<[

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY