ML20147H801: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older edit
VisualWikitext
StriderTol Bot change
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 19: Line 19:
=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:---
{{#Wiki_filter:---
O                                       VENDOR INSPECTION REPORT U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT REGION IV Report No. 99900313/78-01                                 Program No. 44050 Company:     Murdock Incorporated 15800 South Avalon Boulevard Compton, California           90220 Inspection Conducted: August 28-31, 1978 Inspector:
O VENDOR INSPECTION REPORT U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT REGION IV Report No.
_V.
99900313/78-01 Program No.
                                                  '/        C H. Hun ~ter, Contractor In3pector, Vendor kA 8
44050 Company:
                                                                                'Date Inspection Branch Approved by:             -      -      -
Murdock Incorporated 15800 South Avalon Boulevard Compton, California 90220 Inspection Conducted: August 28-31, 1978
[w D. E. Whitesell,~ Chief, Compfpients Section I           Date l
'/
Vendor Inspection Branch Sunmary Inspection on August 28-31, 1978 (99900313/78-01)
C kA 8 Inspector:
Areas Inspected:       Implementation of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B criteria, including calibration, nonconformance/ corrective action, audits, and action on previous findings. The inspection involved thirty-two (32) inspector hours on site.
_V. H. Hun ~ter, Contractor In3pector, Vendor
Results:   In the four (4) areas inspected, no apparent deviations or unresolved items were identified in two (2) areas. The following were identified in the two (2) remaining areas:
'Date Inspection Branch
Deviations: Calibration - Annual inventory / accounting of inspection tools not performed as required by Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR 50 (Enclosure. Items A) and Nonconformance/ Corrective Action - summary report and trend analysis of nonconformities not submitted as required by Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR 50 (Enclosure, Item B).
[w Approved by:
: 2. ? 'y' l   q 1/62 90 //9
D. E. Whitesell,~ Chief, Compfpients Section I Date Vendor Inspection Branch l
Sunmary Inspection on August 28-31, 1978 (99900313/78-01)
Areas Inspected:
Implementation of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B criteria, including calibration, nonconformance/ corrective action, audits, and action on previous findings.
The inspection involved thirty-two (32) inspector hours on site.
Results:
In the four (4) areas inspected, no apparent deviations or unresolved items were identified in two (2) areas.
The following were identified in the two (2) remaining areas:
Deviations:
Calibration - Annual inventory / accounting of inspection tools not performed as required by Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR 50 (Enclosure. Items A) and Nonconformance/ Corrective Action - summary report and trend analysis of nonconformities not submitted as required by Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR 50 (Enclosure, Item B).
: 2. ? 'y' l
q 1/62 90 //9


_2_
_2_
DETAILS A. Persons Contacted H. G. Murdock, Jr. , President
DETAILS A.
        *W. B. Parker, Quality Assurance   Manager G. P. Weber, Calibration Inspector S. M. Walleman, Assistant Quality Assurance Manager W. T. Ulco, Quality Engineer D. L. Fobs, Quality Technician
Persons Contacted H. G. Murdock, Jr., President
*W. B. Parker, Quality Assurance Manager G. P. Weber, Calibration Inspector S. M. Walleman, Assistant Quality Assurance Manager W. T. Ulco, Quality Engineer D. L. Fobs, Quality Technician
* Denotes those present at the exit interview.
* Denotes those present at the exit interview.
B. Action on Previous Findings (Closed) Deviation (Report No. 99900313/77-01): Contrary to para-graph 6.3.3 and 6.4.1 of the ASME accepted QA Manual, shop travelers were revised without review by the Authorized Nuclear Inspector. It was verified that instructions were issued to the Quality Engineers and a training session given which addressed this deviation.
B.
C. Calibration
Action on Previous Findings (Closed) Deviation (Report No. 99900313/77-01):
: 1. Objectives The objectives of this inspection were to:
Contrary to para-graph 6.3.3 and 6.4.1 of the ASME accepted QA Manual, shop travelers were revised without review by the Authorized Nuclear Inspector.
: a. Ascertain that a system has been established and is maintained to assure that tools, gages, instruments and other measuring devices used in activities affecting quality are properly controlled, calibrated and adjusted at specified periods to maintain accuracy within specified limits.
It was verified that instructions were issued to the Quality Engineers and a training session given which addressed this deviation.
: b. Verify that the system described in a. above, has been adequately documented with approved procedures and that these procedures are being implemented.
C.
: 2. Objectives Accomplished by
Calibration 1.
: a. Review Section 9.0 of the ASME accepted QA Manual.
Objectives The objectives of this inspection were to:
: b. Review of calibration master file.
a.
: c. Review of identifying codes and tool recall system.
Ascertain that a system has been established and is maintained to assure that tools, gages, instruments and other measuring devices used in activities affecting quality are properly controlled, calibrated and adjusted at specified periods to maintain accuracy within specified limits.
l
b.
                                                                          *3
Verify that the system described in a. above, has been adequately documented with approved procedures and that these procedures are being implemented.
: d. Visual observation of calibrated tools and gages in all major work stations.
2.
: e. Interviews with cognizant technical and management personnel.
Objectives Accomplished by a.
: 3. Inspection Findings
Review Section 9.0 of the ASME accepted QA Manual.
: a. Deviation See Item A of Enclosure.
b.
: b. Unresolved Items None were identified.
Review of calibration master file.
D. Nonconformances/ Corrective Action
c.
: 1. Objectives The objectives of this inspection were to verify that measures to control materials, parts or components which do not conform to requirements are not inadvertently used. Also, to establish that measures for identification, documentation, segregation and disposition of conditions adverse to quality be promptly identi-fied and corrected to preclude repetition, and reported to appro-priate levels of management.
Review of identifying codes and tool recall system.
: 2. Objectives Accomplished by:
*3 l
: a. Review of Section 13.0 of the ASME accepted QA Manual.
 
: b. Review the following Discrepant Material Dispositions for work order 3-2984-06:
. d.
Minor                             Major 9380                             None 9376 9375 9368 9355 and work order 3-1665-01:
Visual observation of calibrated tools and gages in all major work stations.
Minor                             Major 7960                             7985 8087                             8563 8667 8675 2; _i? Udb
e.
: c. Review of Discrepant Material Log.
Interviews with cognizant technical and management personnel.
: d. Review of Material Review Board dispositions for the past calendar year.
3.
: e. Interviews with technical and management personnel.
Inspection Findings a.
: 3. _ Inspection Findings
Deviation See Item A of Enclosure.
: a. Deviation See Item B of Enclosure.
b.
: b. Unresolved Items None were identified.
Unresolved Items None were identified.
E. Audits
D.
: 1. Objectives The purpose of this inspection was to determine whether the program provides for internal audits to be performed periodically by qualified personnel and whether management reviews the report of the results of the audits for:
Nonconformances/ Corrective Action 1.
: a. Evaluation of the program's effectiveness,
Objectives The objectives of this inspection were to verify that measures to control materials, parts or components which do not conform to requirements are not inadvertently used. Also, to establish that measures for identification, documentation, segregation and disposition of conditions adverse to quality be promptly identi-fied and corrected to preclude repetition, and reported to appro-priate levels of management.
: b. Enforcement of positive and timely corrective action, and
2.
: c. Update of the program to meet new requirements established by code, standard or regulation as appropriate.
Objectives Accomplished by:
: 2. Objectives Accomplished by:
a.
: a. Review of Section 1.0 of the ASME accepted QA Manual.
Review of Section 13.0 of the ASME accepted QA Manual.
: b. Review of current audit schedule.
b.
: c. Review of audit results for the past twelve (12) month period.
Review the following Discrepant Material Dispositions for work order 3-2984-06:
: d. Review of followup audits for corrective action.
Minor Major 9380 None 9376 9375 9368 9355 and work order 3-1665-01:
Minor Major 7960 7985 8087 8563 8667 8675 2; _i? Udb
 
. c.
Review of Discrepant Material Log.
d.
Review of Material Review Board dispositions for the past calendar year.
e.
Interviews with technical and management personnel.
3.
_ Inspection Findings a.
Deviation See Item B of Enclosure.
b.
Unresolved Items None were identified.
E.
Audits 1.
Objectives The purpose of this inspection was to determine whether the program provides for internal audits to be performed periodically by qualified personnel and whether management reviews the report of the results of the audits for:
a.
Evaluation of the program's effectiveness, b.
Enforcement of positive and timely corrective action, and c.
Update of the program to meet new requirements established by code, standard or regulation as appropriate.
2.
Objectives Accomplished by:
a.
Review of Section 1.0 of the ASME accepted QA Manual.
b.
Review of current audit schedule.
c.
Review of audit results for the past twelve (12) month period.
d.
Review of followup audits for corrective action.
E.!JBS5
E.!JBS5
: e. Review of seven (7) auditors' training and qualification records.
 
: f. Interviews with technical and management personnel.
, e.
: 3.         Inspection Findings
Review of seven (7) auditors' training and qualification records.
: a. Deviation None were identified.
f.
: b. Unresolved Items None were identified.
Interviews with technical and management personnel.
F. Exit Interview Theinspectormetwithmanagementrepresentatives(denotedinpara-graph A) at the conclusion of the inspection on August 31, 1978. The management representative acknowledged the statements by the inspector i         concerning the deviations identified this inspection.
3.
Inspection Findings a.
Deviation None were identified.
b.
Unresolved Items None were identified.
F.
Exit Interview Theinspectormetwithmanagementrepresentatives(denotedinpara-graph A) at the conclusion of the inspection on August 31, 1978. The management representative acknowledged the statements by the inspector i
concerning the deviations identified this inspection.
3Ei>^6($
3Ei>^6($
_ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _________ - __         -}}
__}}

Latest revision as of 12:40, 11 December 2024

IE Inspec Rept 99900313/78-01 on 780828-31 During Which Items of Noncompliance Were Noted in the Following Areas: Calibration of Inspec Tools & Nonconformance/Corrective Action Summary Rept Not Submitted
ML20147H801
Person / Time
Issue date: 09/12/1978
From: Hunter V, Whitesell D
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20147H715 List:
References
REF-QA-99900313 NUDOCS 7810270119
Download: ML20147H801 (5)
v • d • e


Text

---

O VENDOR INSPECTION REPORT U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT REGION IV Report No.

99900313/78-01 Program No.

44050 Company:

Murdock Incorporated 15800 South Avalon Boulevard Compton, California 90220 Inspection Conducted: August 28-31, 1978

'/

C kA 8 Inspector:

_V. H. Hun ~ter, Contractor In3pector, Vendor

'Date Inspection Branch

[w Approved by:

D. E. Whitesell,~ Chief, CompfpientsSection I Date Vendor Inspection Branch l

Sunmary Inspection on August 28-31, 1978 (99900313/78-01)

Areas Inspected:

Implementation of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B criteria, including calibration, nonconformance/ corrective action, audits, and action on previous findings.

The inspection involved thirty-two (32) inspector hours on site.

Results:

In the four (4) areas inspected, no apparent deviations or unresolved items were identified in two (2) areas.

The following were identified in the two (2) remaining areas:

Deviations:

Calibration - Annual inventory / accounting of inspection tools not performed as required by Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR 50 (Enclosure. Items A) and Nonconformance/ Corrective Action - summary report and trend analysis of nonconformities not submitted as required by Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR 50 (Enclosure, Item B).

2. ? 'y' l

q 1/62 90 //9

_2_

DETAILS A.

Persons Contacted H. G. Murdock, Jr., President

  • W. B. Parker, Quality Assurance Manager G. P. Weber, Calibration Inspector S. M. Walleman, Assistant Quality Assurance Manager W. T. Ulco, Quality Engineer D. L. Fobs, Quality Technician
  • Denotes those present at the exit interview.

B.

Action on Previous Findings (Closed) Deviation (Report No. 99900313/77-01):

Contrary to para-graph 6.3.3 and 6.4.1 of the ASME accepted QA Manual, shop travelers were revised without review by the Authorized Nuclear Inspector.

It was verified that instructions were issued to the Quality Engineers and a training session given which addressed this deviation.

C.

Calibration 1.

Objectives The objectives of this inspection were to:

a.

Ascertain that a system has been established and is maintained to assure that tools, gages, instruments and other measuring devices used in activities affecting quality are properly controlled, calibrated and adjusted at specified periods to maintain accuracy within specified limits.

b.

Verify that the system described in a. above, has been adequately documented with approved procedures and that these procedures are being implemented.

2.

Objectives Accomplished by a.

Review Section 9.0 of the ASME accepted QA Manual.

b.

Review of calibration master file.

c.

Review of identifying codes and tool recall system.

  • 3 l

. d.

Visual observation of calibrated tools and gages in all major work stations.

e.

Interviews with cognizant technical and management personnel.

3.

Inspection Findings a.

Deviation See Item A of Enclosure.

b.

Unresolved Items None were identified.

D.

Nonconformances/ Corrective Action 1.

Objectives The objectives of this inspection were to verify that measures to control materials, parts or components which do not conform to requirements are not inadvertently used. Also, to establish that measures for identification, documentation, segregation and disposition of conditions adverse to quality be promptly identi-fied and corrected to preclude repetition, and reported to appro-priate levels of management.

2.

Objectives Accomplished by:

a.

Review of Section 13.0 of the ASME accepted QA Manual.

b.

Review the following Discrepant Material Dispositions for work order 3-2984-06:

Minor Major 9380 None 9376 9375 9368 9355 and work order 3-1665-01:

Minor Major 7960 7985 8087 8563 8667 8675 2; _i? Udb

. c.

Review of Discrepant Material Log.

d.

Review of Material Review Board dispositions for the past calendar year.

e.

Interviews with technical and management personnel.

3.

_ Inspection Findings a.

Deviation See Item B of Enclosure.

b.

Unresolved Items None were identified.

E.

Audits 1.

Objectives The purpose of this inspection was to determine whether the program provides for internal audits to be performed periodically by qualified personnel and whether management reviews the report of the results of the audits for:

a.

Evaluation of the program's effectiveness, b.

Enforcement of positive and timely corrective action, and c.

Update of the program to meet new requirements established by code, standard or regulation as appropriate.

2.

Objectives Accomplished by:

a.

Review of Section 1.0 of the ASME accepted QA Manual.

b.

Review of current audit schedule.

c.

Review of audit results for the past twelve (12) month period.

d.

Review of followup audits for corrective action.

E.!JBS5

, e.

Review of seven (7) auditors' training and qualification records.

f.

Interviews with technical and management personnel.

3.

Inspection Findings a.

Deviation None were identified.

b.

Unresolved Items None were identified.

F.

Exit Interview Theinspectormetwithmanagementrepresentatives(denotedinpara-graph A) at the conclusion of the inspection on August 31, 1978. The management representative acknowledged the statements by the inspector i

concerning the deviations identified this inspection.

3Ei>^6($

__

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20147H801&oldid=4177897"