ML20198D528: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
StriderTol Bot insert
 
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:--     __ .         - -         -   .       .     .   -
{{#Wiki_filter:--
      .
__ .
    .
- -
                                                '
-
            .
.
.
.
-
.
.
'
.
I
I
                                                                                  Appendix                                 1
Appendix
                                                                              NOTICE OF VIOLATION
1
          Commonwealth Edison Company                                                             Docket No. 50-456
NOTICE OF VIOLATION
                                                                                                    Docket No. 50-457
Commonwealth Edison Company
Docket No. 50-456
Docket No. 50-457
;
;
          As a result of the inspection conducted on April 30 through September 5, 1985,
As a result of the inspection conducted on April 30 through September 5, 1985,
          and in accordance with the General Policy and Procedures for NRC Enforcement
and in accordance with the General Policy and Procedures for NRC Enforcement
          Actions, (10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C), the following violations were identified:
Actions, (10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C), the following violations were identified:
          1.                                 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, as implemented by the Ceco Quality
1.
                                              Assurance Manual, Quality Requirement Section 5 requires that Quality
10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, as implemented by the Ceco Quality
                                              Assurance carried out for construction activities be described by
Assurance Manual, Quality Requirement Section 5 requires that Quality
  l                                           instructions and procedures.
Assurance carried out for construction activities be described by
                                              Commonwealth Edison in its Quality Assurance Manual, Section 10 and
l
                                              L. K. Comstock in its Procedure 4.1.3, " Qualification Classification and
instructions and procedures.
                                              Training of QC Personnel", commit to ANSI N45.2.6-1978. ANSI N45.2.6-1978,
Commonwealth Edison in its Quality Assurance Manual, Section 10 and
                                              Paragraph 4, states, in part, " Personnel who are assigned the respons-
L. K. Comstock in its Procedure 4.1.3, " Qualification Classification and
                                              ibility and authority to perform functions covered by this Standard shall
Training of QC Personnel", commit to ANSI N45.2.6-1978.
                                              have, as a minimum, the level of capability shown in Table 1." Table 1
ANSI N45.2.6-1978,
                                              requires that evaluating the validity and acceptability of inspection,
Paragraph 4, states, in part, " Personnel who are assigned the respons-
                                              examination and testing results be at least a Level II. L. K. Comstock
ibility and authority to perform functions covered by this Standard shall
                                              (LKC) Procedure 4.1.2, Revision B, Paragraph 3.30, " Position Delineation,"
have, as a minimum, the level of capability shown in Table 1."
  ;
Table 1
                                              states, in part, " Quality Control Lead Inspectors...must be certified
requires that evaluating the validity and acceptability of inspection,
  >
examination and testing results be at least a Level II.
                                              Level II in designated areas...." LKC's " Master Qualification List by
L. K. Comstock
i                                             Discipline for Level II Inspectors," classifies 11 functional areas for
(LKC) Procedure 4.1.2, Revision B, Paragraph 3.30, " Position Delineation,"
:                                             Level II capability, two of which are calibration and concrete expansion
states, in part, " Quality Control Lead Inspectors...must be certified
j                                             anchors (CEAs).
;
-
Level II in designated areas...."
                                              Contrary to the above, the following instances of failure to qualify
LKC's " Master Qualification List by
                                              personnel in accordance with procedures were identified:
>
i
Discipline for Level II Inspectors," classifies 11 functional areas for
:
Level II capability, two of which are calibration and concrete expansion
j
anchors (CEAs).
Contrary to the above, the following instances of failure to qualify
-
personnel in accordance with procedures were identified:
,
,
                                              a.     On May 25, 1984, a LKC QC inspector signed the Level II review
a.
:'
On May 25, 1984, a LKC QC inspector signed the Level II review
                                                      column on two LKC inspection checklists, form 23A, " Variable
:
                                                      Instrument Calibration," for torque wrenches A-531 and A-828,
column on two LKC inspection checklists, form 23A, " Variable
i                                                    although the inspector was not a certified Level II inspector in
'
Instrument Calibration," for torque wrenches A-531 and A-828,
although the inspector was not a certified Level II inspector in
i
i
i
                                                      calibration.
calibration.
                                              b.     From August 1984 to March 1985 the same QC inspector identified
b.
,                                                    abose was designated by LKC to be a Quality Control Lead Inspector
From August 1984 to March 1985 the same QC inspector identified
abose was designated by LKC to be a Quality Control Lead Inspector
,
in calibration and CEAs, although the inspector had no certification
'
'
                                                      in calibration and CEAs, although the inspector had no certification
;                                                    in those areas.
                                              c.    Fro- March 1985 to May 1985 a second QC inspector was designated
                                                      lead in calibration but was not certified as a Level II in
;
;
                                                      that area.
in those areas.
!
c.
                                                      This is a Severity Level V violation (Supplement II).
Fro- March 1985 to May 1985 a second QC inspector was designated
:
lead in calibration but was not certified as a Level II in
that area.
;
!
This is a Severity Level V violation (Supplement II).
:
,
,
!                                                               8511120364     e5     456
!
                                                                ppR   ADOCK O       PDR
8511120364 e5
456
ppR
ADOCK O
PDR
'
'
                                                                a
a
        _ - _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
-
-
-


                        . _.       _ _ _ _   _                 . _ _ _ - - . _   _ _ _       _ __ _ _
. _.
    ,
_ _ _ _
_
. _ _ _ - - . _
_ _ _
_
__ _
_
,
i
i
  .
.
,           *
*
      .
,
4
.
      Appendix                                             2                                   0M
0M
      2.   10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVII, as implemented by the Ceco
Appendix
            Quality Assurance Manual, Quality Requirement Section 17 requires that
2
4
2.
10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVII, as implemented by the Ceco
Quality Assurance Manual, Quality Requirement Section 17 requires that
records be retained and maintained to furnish evidence of activities
4
4
            records be retained and maintained to furnish evidence of activities
affecting quality.
,            affecting quality.
,
            Contrary to the above, the licensee could not provide documented
Contrary to the above, the licensee could not provide documented
!           evidence that welds rejected by Pittsburg . Testing Laboratory (PTL)
!
i           on hangers CC-23, CC-36, CC-87 and CC-34 were reworked, repaired,
evidence that welds rejected by Pittsburg . Testing Laboratory (PTL)
            used-as-is, or reinspected.
i
            This is a Severity Level V violation (Supplement II).
on hangers CC-23, CC-36, CC-87 and CC-34 were reworked, repaired,
      Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, you are required to submit to
used-as-is, or reinspected.
      this office within thirty days of the date of this Notice a written statement
This is a Severity Level V violation (Supplement II).
      or explanation in reply, including for each violation: (1) corrective
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, you are required to submit to
      action taken and the results achieved; (2) corrective action to be taken to
this office within thirty days of the date of this Notice a written statement
or explanation in reply, including for each violation:
(1) corrective
action taken and the results achieved; (2) corrective action to be taken to
avoid a further violation; and (3) the date when full compliance will be
'
'
      avoid a further violation; and (3) the date when full compliance will be
!    achieved. Consideration may be given to extending your response time for
j      good cause shown.
i
,
'
                NOV  4 1985                                  (h
      Dated                                                  J. J. Harrison, Chief
                                                              Engineering Branch
!
!
1
achieved.
Consideration may be given to extending your response time for
j
good cause shown.
i
(h
NOV
4 1985
,
'
Dated
J. J. Harrison, Chief
Engineering Branch
!
1
I
I
$                                                                                                       I
$
                                                                                                        ,
I
                                                                                                        !
,
!
.
.
I
I
                                            _ _ , _ _ _ _ _                     __
_ _ , _ _ _ _ _
                                                                                  _ _ _ _ _ ,
__
                                                                                      _
_ _ _ _ _ ,
_
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 12:38, 10 December 2024

Notice of Violation from Insp on 850430-0905
ML20198D528
Person / Time
Site: Braidwood  
Issue date: 11/04/1985
From: Harrison J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20198D518 List:
References
50-456-85-21, 50-457-85-22, NUDOCS 8511120364
Download: ML20198D528 (2)


See also: IR 05000430/2009005

Text

--

__ .

- -

-

.

.

.

-

.

.

'

.

I

Appendix

1

NOTICE OF VIOLATION

Commonwealth Edison Company

Docket No. 50-456

Docket No. 50-457

As a result of the inspection conducted on April 30 through September 5, 1985,

and in accordance with the General Policy and Procedures for NRC Enforcement

Actions, (10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C), the following violations were identified:

1.

10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, as implemented by the Ceco Quality

Assurance Manual, Quality Requirement Section 5 requires that Quality

Assurance carried out for construction activities be described by

l

instructions and procedures.

Commonwealth Edison in its Quality Assurance Manual, Section 10 and

L. K. Comstock in its Procedure 4.1.3, " Qualification Classification and

Training of QC Personnel", commit to ANSI N45.2.6-1978.

ANSI N45.2.6-1978,

Paragraph 4, states, in part, " Personnel who are assigned the respons-

ibility and authority to perform functions covered by this Standard shall

have, as a minimum, the level of capability shown in Table 1."

Table 1

requires that evaluating the validity and acceptability of inspection,

examination and testing results be at least a Level II.

L. K. Comstock

(LKC) Procedure 4.1.2, Revision B, Paragraph 3.30, " Position Delineation,"

states, in part, " Quality Control Lead Inspectors...must be certified

Level II in designated areas...."

LKC's " Master Qualification List by

>

i

Discipline for Level II Inspectors," classifies 11 functional areas for

Level II capability, two of which are calibration and concrete expansion

j

anchors (CEAs).

Contrary to the above, the following instances of failure to qualify

-

personnel in accordance with procedures were identified:

,

a.

On May 25, 1984, a LKC QC inspector signed the Level II review

column on two LKC inspection checklists, form 23A, " Variable

'

Instrument Calibration," for torque wrenches A-531 and A-828,

although the inspector was not a certified Level II inspector in

i

i

calibration.

b.

From August 1984 to March 1985 the same QC inspector identified

abose was designated by LKC to be a Quality Control Lead Inspector

,

in calibration and CEAs, although the inspector had no certification

'

in those areas.

c.

Fro- March 1985 to May 1985 a second QC inspector was designated

lead in calibration but was not certified as a Level II in

that area.

!

This is a Severity Level V violation (Supplement II).

,

!

8511120364 e5

456

ppR

ADOCK O

PDR

'

a

-

-

-

. _.

_ _ _ _

_

. _ _ _ - - . _

_ _ _

_

__ _

_

,

i

.

,

.

0M

Appendix

2

4

2.

10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVII, as implemented by the Ceco

Quality Assurance Manual, Quality Requirement Section 17 requires that

records be retained and maintained to furnish evidence of activities

4

affecting quality.

,

Contrary to the above, the licensee could not provide documented

!

evidence that welds rejected by Pittsburg . Testing Laboratory (PTL)

i

on hangers CC-23, CC-36, CC-87 and CC-34 were reworked, repaired,

used-as-is, or reinspected.

This is a Severity Level V violation (Supplement II).

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, you are required to submit to

this office within thirty days of the date of this Notice a written statement

or explanation in reply, including for each violation:

(1) corrective

action taken and the results achieved; (2) corrective action to be taken to

avoid a further violation; and (3) the date when full compliance will be

'

!

achieved.

Consideration may be given to extending your response time for

j

good cause shown.

i

(h

NOV

4 1985

,

'

Dated

J. J. Harrison, Chief

Engineering Branch

!

1

I

$

I

,

!

.

I

_ _ , _ _ _ _ _

__

_ _ _ _ _ ,

_