ML20198G456

Provides List of Nrr/Ie Staff Audits/Insps Recorded for Oct, Nov & Dec 1985,for Which Trip Repts Must Be Written

ML20198G456
Person / Time
Site:	Comanche Peak
Issue date:	11/26/1985
From:	Vietticook A NRC - COMANCHE PEAK PROJECT (TECHNICAL REVIEW TEAM)
To:	Shao L NRC
Shared Package
ML20197E251	List: IA-86-272, Discusses 851113-14 Audit of Comanche Peak Response Team Const Evaluation Program in Area Re Piping & Pipe Supports. Three Unresolved Items Listed IA-86-454, Submits Update of 860408 Schedule for Remaining Work Needed on Sser 13 for Comanche Peak Program Plan.Related Info Encl ML20197E245 ML20197E254 ML20197E289 ML20198A376 ML20198G456 ML20210A924 ML20210K577 ML20215B696 ML20215B713 ML20215B725 ML20215B728 ML20215B734 ML20215B736 ML20215B741 ML20215B742 ML20215B745 ML20215B749 ML20215B798 ML20215B805 ML20215B808 ML20215B816 ML20215B827 ML20215B835 ML20215B876 ML20215C176 ML20266H095 ML20266H108 ML20266H113 ML20266H148 ML20266H159 ML20266H170 ML20266H176 ML20266H183 ML20266H193
References
FOIA-86-272, FOIA-86-454 NUDOCS 8512030650
Download: ML20198G456 (4)

Text

-

,u.%

eg(

,,f Zo,,

UNITED STATES P'

+

g g

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION O

E WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 e

e NOV26 W Docket No:

50-445/50-446 MEMORANDUM FOR:

L. Shao J. Calvo J. Milhoan FROM:

A. Vietti-Cook, Project Manager Comanche Peak Project

SUBJECT:

TRIP REPORTS The following is a list of NRR/IE staff audits / inspections I have recorded for the months of October, November, and December 1985, for which trip reports must be written:

Date Lead Subject

1. 10/10-11/85 D. Jeng Site inspection pertaining to Civil / Structural issues

2. 10/25/85 D. Jeng Audit Ebasco effort related to cable tray / conduit supports

3. 10/25/85 D. Terao Audit Stone & Webster activities related to small bore piping review

4. 11/5/85 D. Terao Site inspection of Stone & Webster 11/20/85 Walkdown(CPP-8)

5. 11/8/85 D. Jeng Audit of Ebasco activities in review of cable tray / conduit supports related specifications and design documents

6. 11/11/85 D. Terao Audit of construction adequacy program as it relates to Stone & Webster piping and pipe support effort

7. 11/13/85 D. Jeng Observation of CCL test of conduit supports and components 8, 11/18-22/85 D. Jeng Site inspection of Unit 1 cable tray supports - as-built drawirgs

9. 10/9-10/85 J. Calvo Audit of homogeneous construction 10/16-18/85 activities 10/28-31/85 12/2-13/85(Final) ww!*L 2P

r 9

10. 11/4-6/85 J. Calvo Audit of homogenous design 11/12-13/85 design activities 12/2-3/85

11. 10/28-11/4/85 J. Milhoan Inspection of Design Adequacy Review

12. 10/20-24/85 J. Milhoan Inspection of QA Program Procedures

13. 11/25/85 S. Hou Audit of Stone & Webster non-seismic piping effects on seismic design piping

14. 11/26/85 D. Jeng Audit of Ebasco application of AISC code provisions regarding cable tray hanger design

15. 12/3-4/85 S. Hou Site inspection pertaining to mechanical / piping issues

16. 12/5-6/85 D. Jeng Technical review of allegations in S. Hou structural and mechanical areas.

17. 12/10-11/85 D. Jeng Observation of ANC0 cable tray testing

18. Unscheduled J. Milhoan Inspection / familiarization of Gibbs & Hill design procedures /

process Please prepare trip reports as promptly as possible following the inspection / audit. Please have your secretary put the docket number on the report (50-445 Unit 1, 50-446 Unit 2) with a copy to PDR, T. Westerman and myself. Please clearly identify any potential items of non-compliance or deviations for the Region to act on. Tom Westerman has been provided with r

this list of staff activities and will indicate the inspections / audits that l

NRR/IE conducted for a particular month in a Region IV inspection report and i

will indicate a copy of the trip report will be placed in the PDR upon l

completion.

If this list is incorrect, please contact me immediately, l

tj%.:S

. JMYD Annette Vietti-Cook, Project Manager l

Comanche Peak Project

[

cc:

D. Eisenhut l

H. Thompson V. Noonan C. Trammell T. Westerman D. Jeng D. Terao l

S. Hou C. Early S. Burwell

-f a

UNITED ST ATES

1. '"6%

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMisslON t

wAsmuotos. o.c. rosss gg MEMORANDUM FOR: NRC Teledyne Others C hhrinos J. Flaherty B. Saffell, Battle Columbus J. Knox J. Rivard M. Yost, EG&G E. Tomlinson J. Malonson J. Nevshemal, WESTEC S. Hou R. Hookway N. Rivera D. Jeng L. Stanley, Zytor D. Terao R. Masterson, EAS D. Lurie V. Farrarini, EAS W. Smith R. Philleo C. Hale H. S. Phillips FROM:

Lawrence Shao, Manager Engineering Group Comanche Peak Project Jose A. Calvo, Manager Systems / Operational Group Comanche Peak Project

SUBJECT:

SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT OUTLINE RELATED TO COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM (CPRT) PROGRAM PLAN, REVISION 3 Enclosed is an outline to be used as a guide for preparing the Safety Evaluation Report (SER) related to Comanche Peak Response Team (CPRT) Program Plan. The SER will include four main sections:

o Executive Sumary Staff Evaluation of the CPRT Program Plan o

Staff Evaluation of the CPRT Design Adequacy Review o

Staff Evaluation of the CPRT Construction Adequacy Review o

The persons and/cr organizations responsible for providing direction and ensuring overall consistency for each main section are identified on the top of the first page of each main section of the SER outline. Also, the outline identifies the persons and/or organizations responsible for preparing the various subsections Teledyne will be responsible for the consolidation within each main section.

of the SER inputs and logistics for preparing the first draft SER.

The applicable responses to the NRC Staff Evaluation of CPRT Program Plan, Revision 2 submitted on November 22, 1985; relevant audits perfomed by the hRC concerning the CPRT Program Plan; and forthcoming Revision 3 of the Plan will fom the basis for the safety evaluation. There is sufficient infomation avail-able at this time that we can proceed with the preparation of the SER. Addition-al infomation such as Revision 3 to the CPRT Program Plan will be evaluated on a confimatory basis and any necessary adjustments will be made to the SER.

d Q-(grd:Y 3 f S Cr - c26 J

F We recognize that the preparation of this first-of-the-kind SER will be a significant undertaking. However, we believe that the persons participating in this task have the necessary expertise to meet this challenge and to complete the SER on schedule.

9 Lawrence Shao, Manager Engineering Group Comanche Peak Project g

s, n

/

,pc in. t u v

/

Jose A. Calvo, Manager Systems / Operational Group Comanche Peak Project

Enclosure:

As stated cc:

D. Eisenhut C. Trannel H. Thompson A. Vietti-Cook R. Bernero T. Westerman F. Miraglia P. Keshishian G. Arlotto C. Haughney V. Noonan D. Landers

r Res>onsibility J. ;alvo (NRC)

L.Shao(NRC)

CONSOLIDATION OF SER IhPUTS AND LOGISTICS FOR PREPARING SER......Teledyne SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT OUTLINE RELATED TO COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM (CPRT)

PROGRAM PLAN REVISION 3

r a

CONTENT S Responsibility E. Marinos (1) (NRC)

ABSTRACT.............................................

B. Saffel (Batte111e Columbus)

Teledyne CONTRIBUTORS.........................................

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS........................... Teledyne E. Marinos (1) 1.

INTRODUCTION.....................................

B. Saffell 2.

SUMMARY

OF NRC REVIEW AND EVALUATION............. E.Marinos(1)

B. Saffell 2.1 CPRT Program Plan 2.2 CPRT Design Adequacy Program Plan 2.3 CPRT Construction Adequacy Program Plan E.Marinos(1) 3.

C0hCLUSIONS......................................

B. Saffell E. Marinos (1) 4.

SUtEARY OF OUTSTANDING ISSUES....................

Teledyne (2) (3) (EAS)

R. Masterson E. Marinos (1) 5.

CONFIRMATORY ISSUES..............................

Teledyne (2) (3)

R. Masterson APPENDICIES 1.

Staff Evaluation of CPRT Program Plan............ Teledyne(1)

B. Saffell A.

Staff Evaluation of CPRT Design J. Knox (1)

Adequacy Program Plan..........................

(1)

D.Jeng(1)

S. Hou (NRC)

B.

Staff Evaluation of CPRT Construction E. Tomlinson (1) (NRC)

Adequacy Program Plan..........................

M. Yost (EG8G)

[

l CONTENTS i-1 APPENDIX i Responsibility STAFF EVALUATION OF CPRT PROGRAM PLAN................ Teledyne (1)

B. Saffell B. Saffell 1.

INTRODUCTION.....................................

,2.

CPRT PROGRAM PLAN DESCRIPTION..................... B. Saffell CPRT Design Adequacy Program Plan (DAPP)(CAPP) 2.1 CPRT Construction Adequacy Program Plan 2.2 3.

NRC REVIEW AND EVALUATION........................

B. Saffell 4.

CPRT CAPP AND DAPP COMMON REQUIREMENTS...........

4.1 QA/QC of CPRT Activities.................... Teledyne 4.1.1.

Introduction 4.1.2 CPRT Approach 4.1.3 Staff Evaluation 4.1.4 Conclusions 4.2 Acceptance Criteria......................... Teledyne o Incl. Safety Significance 4.2.1 Introduction 4.2.2 CPRT Approach 4.2.3 Staff Evaluation o Incl. Adverse Trends 4.2.4 Conclusions 4.3 Corrective Actions.......................... Teledyne 4.3.1 Introduction 4.3.2 CPRT Approach 4.3.3 Staff Evaluation 4.3.4 Conclusions 4.4 Independence of the CPRT/SRT Organization... E.Marinos(1)

B. Saffell 4.4.1 Introduction 4.4.2 CPRT Approach 4.4.3 Staff Evaluation 4.4.4 Conclusions

T 1-2 4.5 Discipline Interfaces....................... Teledyne 4.5.1 Introduction 4.5.2 CPRT Approach 4.5.3 Staff Evaluation 4.5.4 Conclusions 5.

OVERALL StMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS.................. Teledyne (1)

B. Saffell 6.

REFERENCES....................................... Teledyne e

A-1 CONTENTS APPENDIX A Responsibility STAFF EVALUATION OF THE CPRT J. Knox (1)

DESIGN ADEQUACY PROGRAM PLAh (DAPP)................ D.Jeng((1)

5. Hou 1)

J. Nevshemal (1) 1.

INTRODUCTION.....................................

(WESTEC)

R. Masterson J. Nevshemal (1) 2.

CPRT PROCESS FOR EVALUATION......................

R. Hasterson J. Nevshemal (1) 3.

STAFF REVIEW AND EVALUATION APPROACH.............

R. Masterson o Auditable Trail 4.

EXTERNAL SOURCE ISSUES o Incl. IAP Cygna J. Flaherty (Teledyne) 4.1 Introduction................................

J. Rivard (Teledyne) 4.2 Electrical, Instrumentation and N. Rivera (Independent)

Control Systems and Components Issues.......

4.2.1 Introduction 4.2.2 CPRT Approach 4.2.3 Staff Evaluation 4.2.4 Conclusions J. Nevshemal (1) 4.3 Mechanical Systems and Components Issues....

R. Masterson (3)

Teledyne (2) 4.3.1 Introduction 4.3.2 CPRT Approach 4.3.3 Staff Evaluation 4.3.4 Conclusions J. Flaherty (1) (EAS) 4.4 Civil and Structural Issues.................

J. Rivard (2) (EAS)

V. Farrarini (3) (EAS) 4.4.1 Introduction 4.4.2 CPRT Approach 4.4.3 Staff Evaluation 4.4.4 Conclusions

A-i Responsibility 4.5 Piping and Supports Issues.................. D.Terao(NRC)

R.Hookway(1)(Teledyne) 4.5.1 Introduction 4.5.2 CPRT Approach 4.5.3 Staff Evaluation 4.5.4 Conclusions 4.6 Closed External Source Issues............... Teledyne 5.

SELF-INITIATED EVALUATION 5.1 Scope.......................................

J. Nevshemal (1) 5.1.1 Introduction 5.1.2 CPRT Approach 5.1.2.1 Homogeneous Design Activities 5.1.2.2 Selection of Review Items 5.1.3 Staff Evaluation 5.1.4 Conclusiens 5.2 Electrical, Instrumentation and Control Systems and Components Design Activities..

N. Rivera 5.2.1 Introduction 5.2.2 CPRT Approach 5.2.3 Staff Evaluation 5.2.4 Conclusions 5.3 Mechanical Systems and J. Nevshemal (1)

Components Design Activities..............

R. Masterson (3)

Teledyne (2) 5.3.1 Introduction 5.3.2 CPRT Approach 5.3.3 Staff Evaluation 5.3.4 Conclusions 5.4 Civil and Structural Design Activities......

J. Flaherty (1)

J. Rivard (2)

V. Farrarini (3) 5.4.1 Introduction 5.4.2 CPRT Approach 5.4.3 Staff Evaluation 5.4.4 Conclusions

r A-3 Responsibility D. Terao 5.5 Piping and Supports Design Activities....... R.Hookway(1) 5.5.1 Introduction 5.5.2 CPRT Approach 5.5.3 Staff Evaluation 5.5.4 Conclusions J. Nevshemal (1) 6.

EXCLUSION OF VENDORS AND OTHER ORGANIZATION ACTIVITES................... Teledyne(2) 6.1 Introduction 6.2 CPRT Justification (Incl. Interfaces) 6.3 Staff Evaluation 6.4 Conclusions 7.

OVERALL

SUMMARY

AND CONCLUSIONS..................

J. Knox (1)

D.Jeng(()

S. Hou 1 Teledyne 8.

REFERENCES.......................................

o a

CONTENTS B-1 APPENDIX B Responsibility STAFF EVALUATION OF THE CPRT CONSTRUCTION ADEQUACY PROGRAM PLAN (CAPP)............ E. Tomlinson (1)

M. Yost B. Saffell 1.

INTRODUCTION.....................................

2.

CPRT PROCESS FOR EVALUATION......................

B. Saffell 3.

STAFF REVIEW AND EVALUATION APPROACH.............

B. Saffell o Auditable Trail 4.

EXTERNAL SOURCE ISSUES (ESIs) 4.1 Introduction................................

J. Flaherty J. Rivard 4.2 Electrical and Instrumentation Issues L. Stanley (Zytor)

Advisor J. Knox 4.2.1 Introduction 4.2.2 CPRT Approach 4.2.3 Staff Evaluation 4.2.4 Conclusions 4.3 Test Program Issues......................... Teledyne Advisor W. Smith (NRC)

• 3.1 Introduction 4.3.2 CPRT Approach 4.3.3 Staff Evaluation 4.3.4 Conclusions Mechanical and Piping Issues................. R. Hookway (1) 4.4 V. Farrarini (4)

R. Masterson (3)

D. Terao (2) 4.4.1 Introduction 4.4.2 CPRT Approach 4.4.3 Staff Evaluation 4.4.4 Conclusions

r-o B-2 Responsibility 4.5 Civil and Structural Issues.................

J. Flaherty (1)

J. Rivard (2)

V. Farrarini (4)

R.Philleo(3)

(Independent) 4.5.1 Introduction 4.5.2 CPRT Approach 4.5.3 Staff Evaluation 4.5.4 Conclusions J. Malonson (Teledyne) 4.6 QA/QC Issues................................

Advisor C. Hale (NRC) 4.6.1 Introduction 4.6.2 CPRT Approach 4.6.3 Staff Evaluation o Incl. App. P of SSER-11 4.6.4 Conclusions 4.7 Miscellaneous Issues........................ Teledyne Advisor H. S. Phillips (NRC) 4.7.1 Introduction 4.7.2 CPRT Approach 4.7.3 Staff Evaluation 4.7.4 Conclusions 4.8 Closed External Source Issues............... Teledyne 5.

SELF-IhlTIATED EVALUATION B. Saffell 5.1 Scope.......................................

5.1.1 Introduction 5.1.2 CPRT Approach 5.1.2.1 Homogeneous Construction Activities 5.1.2.2 Selection of Inspection Items............. Advisor D. Lurie (NRC) 5.1.3 Staff Evaluation 5.1.4 Conclusions 5.2 Electrical Equipment Popul ations............ M.Yost(1)

L. Stanley 5.5.1 Introduction 5.5.2 CPRT Approach 5.5.3 Staff Evaluation 5.5.4 Conclusions

~_

T B-3 Responsibility 5.3 Mechanical Equipment Populations 5.3.1 HVAC Equipment.......................

J. Flaherty J. Rivard 5.3.1.1 Introduction 5.3.1.2 CPRT Approach 5.3.1.3 Staff Evaluation 5.3.1.4 Conclusions 5.3.2 Mechanical Equipment.................

J. Flaherty (1) o Incl. Field Fabricated Tanks J. Rivard (2)

J. Nevshemal (3)

B. Saffell (4) 5.3.2.1 Introduction 5.3.2.2 CPRT Approach 5.3.2.3 Staff Evaluation 5.3.2.4 Conclusions 5.3.3 Piping and Bol ted Joints.............

J. Flaherty (1)

J.Rivard(2)(3)

R. Masterson V. Farrarini (4) 5.3.3.1 Introduction 5.3.3.2 CPRT Approach 5.3.3.3 Staff Evaluation 5.3.3.4 Conclusions 5.4 Structural Populations 5.4.1 Structural Steel......................

J. Flaherty (1)

J. Rivard (2)

V. Farrarini (3) 5.4.1.1 Introduction 5.4.1.2 CPRT Approach 5.4.1.3 Staff Evaluation 5.4.1.4 Conclusions 5.4.2 Concrete.............................

J. Flaherty (1) o Incl. Fill & Backfill Placement J. Rivard (2) s R.Philleo(3) 5.4.2.1 Introduction 5.4.2.2 CPRT Approach 5.4.2.3 Staff Evaluation 5.4.2.4 Conclusions

B-4 Responsibility 5.4.3 Liners...............................

J. Flaherty (1)

J. Rivard (2)

V. Farrarini (3) 5.4.3.1 Introduction 5.4.3.2 CPRT Approach 5.4.3.3 Staff Evaluation 5.4.3.4 Conclusions 5.4.4 Supports.............................

J. Flaherty (1) o Incl. Pipe Whip R. Masterson 5.4.4.1 Introduction 5.4.4.2 CPRT Approach 5.4.4.3 Staff Evaluation 5.4.4.4 Conclusions 6.

EXCLUSION OF VENDORS AND J. Flaherty OTHER ORGANIZATION ACTIVITES...................

J. Rivard 6.1 Introduction 6.2 CPRTJustification(Incl. Interfaces) 6.3 Staff Evaluation 6.4 Conclusions 7.

OVERALL

SUMMARY

AND CONCLUSIONS..................

E. Tomlinson (1)

M. Yost 8.

REFERENCES....................................... Teledyne f

t 4

i f

-