ML20237L785: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
VisualWikitext
StriderTol Bot insert
 
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 19: Line 19:
=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:__
{{#Wiki_filter:__
  $$' ,
$$',
                                          AUG 3 l 1987
AUG 3 l 1987
      In Reply Refer To:
In Reply Refer To:
      Dockets: 50-445/87-04
Dockets:
                                                                          >
50-445/87-04
                  50-446/87-04
>
      TU Electric
50-446/87-04
      ATTN: Mr. W. G. Counsil
TU Electric
                Executive Vice President
ATTN:
      400 North Olive Street, L.B. 81
Mr. W. G.
      Dallas, Texas     75201
Counsil
      Gentlemen:
Executive Vice President
      This refers to the inspection conducted by Mr. I. Barnes, other
400 North Olive Street, L.B. 81
      inspectors, and consultants during the period January 1 through
Dallas, Texas
      February 28, 1987, of activities authorized by NRC Construction
75201
      Permits CPPR-126 and CPPR-127 for the Comanche Peak Steam Electric
Gentlemen:
      Station, Units 1 and 2, and to the discussion of our findings with
This refers to the inspection conducted by Mr. I. Barnes, other
      you' and other ruembers of your staff at the conclusion of the
inspectors, and consultants during the period January 1 through
      inspection.
February 28, 1987, of activities authorized by NRC Construction
      The area examined during the inspection was the Comanche Peak
Permits CPPR-126 and CPPR-127 for the Comanche Peak Steam Electric
      Response Team activity related to the evaluation of inspection and
Station, Units 1 and 2, and to the discussion of our findings with
      documentation review findings for safety significance. The
you' and other ruembers of your staff at the conclusion of the
      inspection consisted of selective examination of procedures and
inspection.
      representative records, interviews with personnel, and evaluations
The area examined during the inspection was the Comanche Peak
      by the inspectors. These findings are documented in the enclosed
Response Team activity related to the evaluation of inspection and
      inspection report.
documentation review findings for safety significance.
      During this inspection, certain items of potential generic concern,
The
      which are discussed in paragraph 3 of the enclosed inspection
inspection consisted of selective examination of procedures and
      report, were identified. You are requested to respond in writing
representative records, interviews with personnel, and evaluations
      to the four open generic issues in paragraph 3, addressing
by the inspectors.
      corrective actions taken or which will be taken and ac'aions taken
These findings are documented in the enclosed
      to preclude recurrence. Your response should provide sufficient
inspection report.
      information to resolve each of the generic issues including the NRC
During this inspection, certain items of potential generic concern,
      concerns listed as examples of each.     In addition, you are
which are discussed in paragraph 3 of the enclosed inspection
      requested to respond in writing to the open items discussed in     ,
report, were identified.
      paragraphs 4 and 5 of the enclosed inspection report. Sufficient
You are requested to respond in writing
      information should be provided (or made reference to) in your
to the four open generic issues in paragraph 3, addressing
      response to provide for resolution of each concern.
corrective actions taken or which will be taken and ac'aions taken
            Y             x2     RFl0     RM hv'
to preclude recurrence.
      OSP:CPPD:IP       SPI:IP   AD:IP     D:CPPD
Your response should provide sufficient
      PWagner           IBarnes RWarnick CGrimes
information to resolve each of the generic issues including the NRC
      8/.f[/87         8/3//87 8/Rf/87   8/3f/87
concerns listed as examples of each.
    G709090071 870931
In addition, you are
    PDR ADOCK 05000445
requested to respond in writing to the open items discussed in
    G               PDR                                                   l
,
                                                                          l
paragraphs 4 and 5 of the enclosed inspection report.
                                                                          a
Sufficient
information should be provided (or made reference to) in your
response to provide for resolution of each concern.
Y
x2
RFl0
RM hv'
OSP:CPPD:IP
SPI:IP
AD:IP
D:CPPD
PWagner
IBarnes
RWarnick
CGrimes
8/.f[/87
8/3//87
8/Rf/87
8/3f/87
G709090071 870931
PDR
ADOCK 05000445
G
PDR
a


,.               _                                               _           - _ . .       ___       _ .._ __ .___ ___ _ _ _ _ _
,.
                                                                                                                                        __,
_
        m:
_
                    :)
- _ . .
                                                      '
___
                      >. ,' TU Electric                                                 2
_ .._ __ .___ ___ _ _ _ _ _
                                                                                                                  . AUG 3. l 1987
__,
  -
m:
                            Should..you have any' questions'concer.'.ng-this inspection,-ws will;
'
                          .be pleased.to discuss them1with you.
,' U Electric
                                                                                        -Sincerely,
:)
                                                                                          ORIGINAs SIGNED BY R. F. WARNICI           _
T
    ..                                                                                 C. I. Grimes,~ Director.
2
                                                                                        Comanche Peak-Project Division
. AUG 3. l 1987
                                                                                        Office of Special Projects
>.
                            . Enclosure:                             ..
-
                            -Inspection Report: 50-445/87-04;
Should..you have any' questions'concer.'.ng-this inspection,-ws will;
                                    50-446/87-04
.be pleased.to discuss them1with you.
                            cc'w/ enclosure:
-Sincerely,
                              (see next page)
ORIGINAs SIGNED BY R. F. WARNICI
l ;,     .c
_
                                                                                                                                      ,
..
C. I. Grimes,~ Director.
Comanche Peak-Project Division
Office of Special Projects
. Enclosure:
..
-Inspection Report: 50-445/87-04;
50-446/87-04
cc'w/ enclosure:
(see next page)
l ;,
.c
,
i-
i-
L
L
            _ - -               _ _ _ _ ____-______-__-__-____=________-_________          _     _.
_ - -
_ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ = _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_
_.


- __ - __ - _ ___ -__- ___- __- -                     ._ _           _       _
-
                                                                                                        l
__ - __ - _ ___ -__- ___- __- -
      /                                                      UNITED STATES
._
  8                                 g            NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
_
  $                                   j                     WASHINGTON, D. C. 20656
_
        %.... 4[                                                                                         ,
_
                                                                                                        i
/
                                  In Reply Refer To:
UNITED STATES
                                  Dockets:- 50-44S/87-04                 AUG 3 1 1987
8
                                              50-446/87-04
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
                                  TU Electric
g
                                  ATTN: Mr. W. G. Counsil
$
                                          Executive Vice President
j
                                  400 North Olive Street, L.B. 81                                       1
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20656
                                  Dallas, Texas     75201
%.... 4[
                                  Gentlemen:
i
                                  This refers to the inspection conducted by Mr.       I. Barnes, other
In Reply Refer To:
                                  inspectors, and consultants during the period January 1 through
AUG 3 1 1987
                                  February 28, 1987,.of activities authorized by NRC Construction
Dockets:- 50-44S/87-04
                                  Permits CPPR-126 and CPPR-127 for the Comanche Peak Steam Electric
50-446/87-04
                                  Station, Units 1 and 2, and to the discussion of our findings with
TU Electric
                                  you and other members of your staff at the conclusion of the
ATTN:
                                  inspection.
Mr. W. G. Counsil
                                  The area examined during the inspection was the Comanche Peak
Executive Vice President
                                  Response Team activity related to the evaluation of inspection and
400 North Olive Street, L.B. 81
                                documentation review findings for safety significance. The
1
                                  inspection consisted of selective examination of procedures and
Dallas, Texas
                                  representative records, interviews with personnel, and evaluations
75201
                                Uy the inspectors. These findings are documented in the enclosed
Gentlemen:
                                inspection report.
This refers to the inspection conducted by Mr.
                                During this inspection, certain items of potential generic concern,
I. Barnes, other
                                which are discussed in paragraph 3 of the enclosed inspection
inspectors, and consultants during the period January 1 through
                                report, were identified.       You are requested to respond in writing
February 28, 1987,.of activities authorized by NRC Construction
                                to the four open generic issues in paragraph 3, addressing
Permits CPPR-126 and CPPR-127 for the Comanche Peak Steam Electric
                                corrective actions taken or which will be taken and actions taken
Station, Units 1 and 2, and to the discussion of our findings with
                                to preclude recurrence. Your response should provide sufficient
you and other members of your staff at the conclusion of the
                                information to resolve each of the generic issues including the NRC
inspection.
                                concerns listed as examples of each. In addition, you are
The area examined during the inspection was the Comanche Peak
                                requested to respond in writing to the open items discussed in
Response Team activity related to the evaluation of inspection and
                                paragraphs 4 and 5 of the enclosed inspection report. Sufficient
documentation review findings for safety significance.
                                information should be provided (or made reference to) in your
The
                                response to provide for resolution of each concern.
inspection consisted of selective examination of procedures and
representative records, interviews with personnel, and evaluations
Uy the inspectors.
These findings are documented in the enclosed
inspection report.
During this inspection, certain items of potential generic concern,
which are discussed in paragraph 3 of the enclosed inspection
report, were identified.
You are requested to respond in writing
to the four open generic issues in paragraph 3, addressing
corrective actions taken or which will be taken and actions taken
to preclude recurrence.
Your response should provide sufficient
information to resolve each of the generic issues including the NRC
concerns listed as examples of each.
In addition, you are
requested to respond in writing to the open items discussed in
paragraphs 4 and 5 of the enclosed inspection report.
Sufficient
information should be provided (or made reference to) in your
response to provide for resolution of each concern.


                                                                                                        ___
___
                                                                                                            _ _ _ - _ _ _ -
_ _ _ - _ _ _ -
    d
d
                    .- '
.- '
                                      *
* TU ElGetric
                                *       > TU ElGetric                      2
2
*
>
AUG 31 1987
l
l
                                                                                              AUG 31 1987
.
  .
1
1
                                            Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will
Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will
                                            be pleased to discuss them with you.
be pleased to discuss them with you.
                                                                            Sincerely,
Sincerely,
                                                                              RF4Medh       &
RF4Medh
                                                                            C. I. Grimes, Director
&
C. I. Grimes, Director
Comanche Peak Project Division
'
'
                                                                            Comanche Peak Project Division
office of Special Projects
                                                                            office of Special Projects
Enclosure:
                                          Enclosure:
Inspection Report 50-445/87-04;
                                          Inspection Report 50-445/87-04;
7
  7                                         50-446/87-04
50-446/87-04
                                          cc w/ enclosure:
cc w/ enclosure:
                                          (See next page)
(See next page)
>
>
                                                                                                                            i
i
                                                                                                                            1
1
                                                                                                                            .\
.\\
      _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.- _ _ _ __ _ _ -               -                                                                     )
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.- _ _ _ __ _ _ -
-
)


                            ' ' '
' ' '
                                , Ty Electric                       3                 AUG 31 1987
Ty Electric
                                  cc w/ enclosure:
3
                                  G. S. Keeley                       Bureau of Radiation Control
AUG 31 1987
                                  Manager, Nuclear Licensing         State of Texas
,
                                  TU Electric                         1100 West 49th Street
cc w/ enclosure:
                                  Skyway Tower                       Austin, Texas 78756
G. S. Keeley
                                  400 North Olive Street, L.B.81
Bureau of Radiation Control
                                  Dallas, Texas 75201                 Nancy H.' Williams
Manager, Nuclear Licensing
                                                                      CYGNA Energy Services
State of Texas
                                  Juanita Ellis                       Suite 390
TU Electric
                                  President - CASE                   2121 N. California Blvd
1100 West 49th Street
                                  1426 South Polk Street             Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Skyway Tower
                                  Dallas, Texas 75224
Austin, Texas
                                  Renea Hicks, Esq.
78756
                                  Assistant Attorney General
400 North Olive Street, L.B.81
                                  Environmental Protection Division
Dallas, Texas
                                  P.O. Box 12548, Capitol Station
75201
                                  Austin, Texas 78711-2548
Nancy H.' Williams
                                  Administrative Judge Peter Bloch
CYGNA Energy Services
                                  U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Juanita Ellis
                                  Washington, D.C. 20555
Suite 390
                                  Elizabeth'B. Johnson
President - CASE
                                  Administrative Judge
2121 N.
                                  Oak Ridge National Laboratory
California Blvd
                                  Post Office Box X, Building 3500
1426 South Polk Street
                                  Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37839
Walnut Creek, CA
                                  Dr. Kenneth A. McCollom
94596
                                  1107 West Knapp
Dallas, Texas
                                  Stillwater, Oklahoma 74075
75224
                                  Dr. Walter H. Jordan
Renea Hicks, Esq.
                                  Administrative Judge
Assistant Attorney General
                                  881 West Outer Drive
Environmental Protection Division
                                  Oak Ridge, Tennessee   37830
P.O. Box 12548, Capitol Station
                                  Anthony Z. Roisman, Esq.
Austin, Texas
                                  Suite 600
78711-2548
                                  1401 New York Avenue, N.W.
Administrative Judge Peter Bloch
                                  Washington, D.C. 20005
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
                                  Ms. Billie Pirner Garde
Washington, D.C.
                                  Government Accountability Project
20555
                                  Midwest Office
Elizabeth'B. Johnson
                                  104 East Wisconsin Avenue                                       !
Administrative Judge
                                  Appleton, Wisconsin 54915-8605
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
                                                                                                  1
Post Office Box X, Building 3500
%-m--___________-______.___         _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Oak Ridge, Tennessee
37839
Dr. Kenneth A. McCollom
1107 West Knapp
Stillwater, Oklahoma
74075
Dr. Walter H. Jordan
Administrative Judge
881 West Outer Drive
Oak Ridge, Tennessee
37830
Anthony Z. Roisman, Esq.
Suite 600
1401 New York Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C.
20005
Ms. Billie Pirner Garde
Government Accountability Project
Midwest Office
104 East Wisconsin Avenue
!
Appleton, Wisconsin
54915-8605
1
%-m--___________-______.___
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 06:13, 2 December 2024

Forwards Insp Repts 50-445/87-04 & 50-446/87-04 on 870101-0228.Certain Items of Potential Generic Concern Identified
ML20237L785
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak  
Issue date: 08/31/1987
From: Charemagne Grimes
NRC OFFICE OF SPECIAL PROJECTS
To: Counsil W
TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC)
Shared Package
ML20237L788 List:
References
NUDOCS 8709090071
Download: ML20237L785 (5)
v • d • e


See also: IR 05000445/1987004

Text

__

$$',

AUG 3 l 1987

In Reply Refer To:

Dockets:

50-445/87-04

>

50-446/87-04

TU Electric

ATTN:

Mr. W. G.

Counsil

Executive Vice President

400 North Olive Street, L.B. 81

Dallas, Texas

75201

Gentlemen:

This refers to the inspection conducted by Mr. I. Barnes, other

inspectors, and consultants during the period January 1 through

February 28, 1987, of activities authorized by NRC Construction

Permits CPPR-126 and CPPR-127 for the Comanche Peak Steam Electric

Station, Units 1 and 2, and to the discussion of our findings with

you' and other ruembers of your staff at the conclusion of the

inspection.

The area examined during the inspection was the Comanche Peak

Response Team activity related to the evaluation of inspection and

documentation review findings for safety significance.

The

inspection consisted of selective examination of procedures and

representative records, interviews with personnel, and evaluations

by the inspectors.

These findings are documented in the enclosed

inspection report.

During this inspection, certain items of potential generic concern,

which are discussed in paragraph 3 of the enclosed inspection

report, were identified.

You are requested to respond in writing

to the four open generic issues in paragraph 3, addressing

corrective actions taken or which will be taken and ac'aions taken

to preclude recurrence.

Your response should provide sufficient

information to resolve each of the generic issues including the NRC

concerns listed as examples of each.

In addition, you are

requested to respond in writing to the open items discussed in

,

paragraphs 4 and 5 of the enclosed inspection report.

Sufficient

information should be provided (or made reference to) in your

response to provide for resolution of each concern.

Y

x2

RFl0

RM hv'

OSP:CPPD:IP

SPI:IP

AD:IP

D:CPPD

PWagner

IBarnes

RWarnick

CGrimes

8/.f[/87

8/3//87

8/Rf/87

8/3f/87

G709090071 870931

PDR

ADOCK 05000445

G

PDR

a

,.

_

_

- _ . .

___

_ .._ __ .___ ___ _ _ _ _ _

__,

m:

'

,' U Electric

)

T

2

. AUG 3. l 1987

>.

-

Should..you have any' questions'concer.'.ng-this inspection,-ws will;

.be pleased.to discuss them1with you.

-Sincerely,

ORIGINAs SIGNED BY R. F. WARNICI

_

..

C. I. Grimes,~ Director.

Comanche Peak-Project Division

Office of Special Projects

. Enclosure:

..

-Inspection Report: 50-445/87-04;

50-446/87-04

cc'w/ enclosure:

(see next page)

l ;,

.c

,

i-

L

_ - -

_ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ = _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_

_.

-

__ - __ - _ ___ -__- ___- __- -

._

_

_

_

/

UNITED STATES

8

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

g

$

j

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20656

%.... 4[

i

In Reply Refer To:

AUG 3 1 1987

Dockets:- 50-44S/87-04

50-446/87-04

TU Electric

ATTN:

Mr. W. G. Counsil

Executive Vice President

400 North Olive Street, L.B. 81

1

Dallas, Texas

75201

Gentlemen:

This refers to the inspection conducted by Mr.

I. Barnes, other

inspectors, and consultants during the period January 1 through

February 28, 1987,.of activities authorized by NRC Construction

Permits CPPR-126 and CPPR-127 for the Comanche Peak Steam Electric

Station, Units 1 and 2, and to the discussion of our findings with

you and other members of your staff at the conclusion of the

inspection.

The area examined during the inspection was the Comanche Peak

Response Team activity related to the evaluation of inspection and

documentation review findings for safety significance.

The

inspection consisted of selective examination of procedures and

representative records, interviews with personnel, and evaluations

Uy the inspectors.

These findings are documented in the enclosed

inspection report.

During this inspection, certain items of potential generic concern,

which are discussed in paragraph 3 of the enclosed inspection

report, were identified.

You are requested to respond in writing

to the four open generic issues in paragraph 3, addressing

corrective actions taken or which will be taken and actions taken

to preclude recurrence.

Your response should provide sufficient

information to resolve each of the generic issues including the NRC

concerns listed as examples of each.

In addition, you are

requested to respond in writing to the open items discussed in

paragraphs 4 and 5 of the enclosed inspection report.

Sufficient

information should be provided (or made reference to) in your

response to provide for resolution of each concern.

___

_ _ _ - _ _ _ -

d

.- '

  • TU ElGetric

2

>

AUG 31 1987

l

.

1

Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will

be pleased to discuss them with you.

Sincerely,

RF4Medh

&

C. I. Grimes, Director

Comanche Peak Project Division

'

office of Special Projects

Enclosure:

Inspection Report 50-445/87-04;

7

50-446/87-04

cc w/ enclosure:

(See next page)

>

i

1

.\\

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.- _ _ _ __ _ _ -

-

)

' ' '

Ty Electric

3

AUG 31 1987

,

cc w/ enclosure:

G. S. Keeley

Bureau of Radiation Control

Manager, Nuclear Licensing

State of Texas

TU Electric

1100 West 49th Street

Skyway Tower

Austin, Texas

78756

400 North Olive Street, L.B.81

Dallas, Texas

75201

Nancy H.' Williams

CYGNA Energy Services

Juanita Ellis

Suite 390

President - CASE

2121 N.

California Blvd

1426 South Polk Street

Walnut Creek, CA

94596

Dallas, Texas

75224

Renea Hicks, Esq.

Assistant Attorney General

Environmental Protection Division

P.O. Box 12548, Capitol Station

Austin, Texas

78711-2548

Administrative Judge Peter Bloch

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Washington, D.C.

20555

Elizabeth'B. Johnson

Administrative Judge

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

Post Office Box X, Building 3500

Oak Ridge, Tennessee

37839

Dr. Kenneth A. McCollom

1107 West Knapp

Stillwater, Oklahoma

74075

Dr. Walter H. Jordan

Administrative Judge

881 West Outer Drive

Oak Ridge, Tennessee

37830

Anthony Z. Roisman, Esq.

Suite 600

1401 New York Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C.

20005

Ms. Billie Pirner Garde

Government Accountability Project

Midwest Office

104 East Wisconsin Avenue

!

Appleton, Wisconsin

54915-8605

1

%-m--___________-______.___

_ _ _ _ _ _ _

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20237L785&oldid=3920588"