ML20237L785

Forwards Insp Repts 50-445/87-04 & 50-446/87-04 on 870101-0228.Certain Items of Potential Generic Concern Identified

ML20237L785
Person / Time
Site:	Comanche Peak
Issue date:	08/31/1987
From:	Charemagne Grimes NRC OFFICE OF SPECIAL PROJECTS
To:	Counsil W TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC)
Shared Package
ML20237L788	List: IR 05000445/1987004 ML20237L785
References
NUDOCS 8709090071
Download: ML20237L785 (5)

See also: IR 05000445/1987004

Text

__

$$' ,

AUG 3 l 1987

In Reply Refer To:

Dockets: 50-445/87-04

>

50-446/87-04

TU Electric

ATTN: Mr. W. G. Counsil

Executive Vice President

400 North Olive Street, L.B. 81

Dallas, Texas 75201

Gentlemen:

This refers to the inspection conducted by Mr. I. Barnes, other

inspectors, and consultants during the period January 1 through

February 28, 1987, of activities authorized by NRC Construction

Permits CPPR-126 and CPPR-127 for the Comanche Peak Steam Electric

Station, Units 1 and 2, and to the discussion of our findings with

you' and other ruembers of your staff at the conclusion of the

inspection.

The area examined during the inspection was the Comanche Peak

Response Team activity related to the evaluation of inspection and

documentation review findings for safety significance. The

inspection consisted of selective examination of procedures and

representative records, interviews with personnel, and evaluations

by the inspectors. These findings are documented in the enclosed

inspection report.

During this inspection, certain items of potential generic concern,

which are discussed in paragraph 3 of the enclosed inspection

report, were identified. You are requested to respond in writing

to the four open generic issues in paragraph 3, addressing

corrective actions taken or which will be taken and ac'aions taken

to preclude recurrence. Your response should provide sufficient

information to resolve each of the generic issues including the NRC

concerns listed as examples of each. In addition, you are

requested to respond in writing to the open items discussed in ,

paragraphs 4 and 5 of the enclosed inspection report. Sufficient

information should be provided (or made reference to) in your

response to provide for resolution of each concern.

Y x2 RFl0 RM hv'

OSP:CPPD:IP SPI:IP AD:IP D:CPPD

PWagner IBarnes RWarnick CGrimes

8/.f[/87 8/3//87 8/Rf/87 8/3f/87

G709090071 870931

PDR ADOCK 05000445

G PDR l

l

a

,. _ _ - _ . . ___ _ .._ __ .___ ___ _ _ _ _ _

__,

m:

)

'

>. ,' TU Electric 2

. AUG 3. l 1987

-

Should..you have any' questions'concer.'.ng-this inspection,-ws will;

.be pleased.to discuss them1with you.

-Sincerely,

ORIGINAs SIGNED BY R. F. WARNICI _

.. C. I. Grimes,~ Director.

Comanche Peak-Project Division

Office of Special Projects

. Enclosure: ..

-Inspection Report: 50-445/87-04;

50-446/87-04

cc'w/ enclosure:

(see next page)

l ;, .c

,

i-

L

_ - - _ _ _ _ ____-______-__-__-____=________-_________ _ _.

- __ - __ - _ ___ -__- ___- __- - ._ _ _ _

l

/ UNITED STATES

8 g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

$ j WASHINGTON, D. C. 20656

%.... 4[ ,

i

In Reply Refer To:

Dockets:- 50-44S/87-04 AUG 3 1 1987

50-446/87-04

TU Electric

ATTN: Mr. W. G. Counsil

Executive Vice President

400 North Olive Street, L.B. 81 1

Dallas, Texas 75201

Gentlemen:

This refers to the inspection conducted by Mr. I. Barnes, other

inspectors, and consultants during the period January 1 through

February 28, 1987,.of activities authorized by NRC Construction

Permits CPPR-126 and CPPR-127 for the Comanche Peak Steam Electric

Station, Units 1 and 2, and to the discussion of our findings with

you and other members of your staff at the conclusion of the

inspection.

The area examined during the inspection was the Comanche Peak

Response Team activity related to the evaluation of inspection and

documentation review findings for safety significance. The

inspection consisted of selective examination of procedures and

representative records, interviews with personnel, and evaluations

Uy the inspectors. These findings are documented in the enclosed

inspection report.

During this inspection, certain items of potential generic concern,

which are discussed in paragraph 3 of the enclosed inspection

report, were identified. You are requested to respond in writing

to the four open generic issues in paragraph 3, addressing

corrective actions taken or which will be taken and actions taken

to preclude recurrence. Your response should provide sufficient

information to resolve each of the generic issues including the NRC

concerns listed as examples of each. In addition, you are

requested to respond in writing to the open items discussed in

paragraphs 4 and 5 of the enclosed inspection report. Sufficient

information should be provided (or made reference to) in your

response to provide for resolution of each concern.

___

_ _ _ - _ _ _ -

d

.- '

• > TU ElGetric 2

l

AUG 31 1987

.

1

Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will

be pleased to discuss them with you.

Sincerely,

RF4Medh &

C. I. Grimes, Director

'

Comanche Peak Project Division

office of Special Projects

Enclosure:

Inspection Report 50-445/87-04;

7 50-446/87-04

cc w/ enclosure:

(See next page)

>

i

1

.\

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.- _ _ _ __ _ _ - - )

' ' '

, Ty Electric 3 AUG 31 1987

cc w/ enclosure:

G. S. Keeley Bureau of Radiation Control

Manager, Nuclear Licensing State of Texas

TU Electric 1100 West 49th Street

Skyway Tower Austin, Texas 78756

400 North Olive Street, L.B.81

Dallas, Texas 75201 Nancy H.' Williams

CYGNA Energy Services

Juanita Ellis Suite 390

President - CASE 2121 N. California Blvd

1426 South Polk Street Walnut Creek, CA 94596

Dallas, Texas 75224

Renea Hicks, Esq.

Assistant Attorney General

Environmental Protection Division

P.O. Box 12548, Capitol Station

Austin, Texas 78711-2548

Administrative Judge Peter Bloch

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Washington, D.C. 20555

Elizabeth'B. Johnson

Administrative Judge

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

Post Office Box X, Building 3500

Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37839

Dr. Kenneth A. McCollom

1107 West Knapp

Stillwater, Oklahoma 74075

Dr. Walter H. Jordan

Administrative Judge

881 West Outer Drive

Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830

Anthony Z. Roisman, Esq.

Suite 600

1401 New York Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20005

Ms. Billie Pirner Garde

Government Accountability Project

Midwest Office

104 East Wisconsin Avenue  !

Appleton, Wisconsin 54915-8605

1

%-m--___________-______.___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _