ML20247C928: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot insert |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot change |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:- | {{#Wiki_filter:- | ||
.a | .a | ||
..g | |||
. s.1 | |||
- q.y September 6, 1989 Georgia Power Company LATTN: Mr.. W.: G. Hairston,.III Senior Vice: President- | |||
40; Inverness Center Parkway | . Nuclear 0perations: | ||
y 40; Inverness Center Parkway | |||
.P. 0.; Box 1295-Birmingham, AL 35201' Gentlemen:. | |||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
EXAMINATION . REPORT' . 50-321/0L-89-01' On June 12. | EXAMINATION. REPORT'. 50-321/0L-89-01' On June 12. | ||
16, 1989, the;NRC administered examinations to employees of-your | |||
. company who had; applied for licenses. to operate your E. I. Hatch facility. ' At | |||
Your attentionJis invited to tw'o specific areas of concern. -As detailed.in | ' the' conclusion of :the. examination, the examination questions and.~ preliminary findings were discussed with those members of your. staff identified in the enclosed report. | ||
1 Your attentionJis invited to tw'o specific areas of concern. -As detailed.in | |||
'the.Examinatic,n. Report. your pre-examination review was ineffective in - | |||
ensuring site-specific examination validity and, the operator generic weak- | ensuring site-specific examination validity and, the operator generic weak- | ||
.nesses that were noted during the operating. examinations. | |||
Further management | |||
. attention istneeded to eliminate'these concerns, r | |||
In 'accordance with 10.CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of | In 'accordance with 10.CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of | ||
' this letter and the enclosures will be pitced in the NRC Public Document Room. | |||
Should you have any questions concerning this examination, please contact us. | Should you have any questions concerning this examination, please contact us. | ||
Sincerely, | i Sincerely, (original signed by T. A. Peebles) | ||
(original signed by T. A. Peebles) | |||
Thomas A. Peebles, Chief Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety | Thomas A. Peebles, Chief Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety | ||
==Enclosures:== | ==Enclosures:== | ||
'1.. Report Details | |||
' 2. | |||
Examination (s) and Answer Key (s) (SR0/R0) | |||
~ | |||
3. | |||
Facility Comments | |||
'4. | |||
NRC Resolution of Comments 5. | |||
Simulation Facility Report | |||
- cc w/ enc 1 1: | |||
(See page 2) | |||
~ | |||
'8909140130 890906 PDR ADOCK 05000321 V | |||
PDC f | |||
kl y[ | |||
......m. | |||
J | |||
[ | [ | ||
cc w/ enc 1 1: | '' Georgia Power Company 2 | ||
September 6, 1989 cc w/ enc 1 1: | |||
State of Georgia cc w/ enc 1s 1 and 5: | State of Georgia cc w/ enc 1s 1 and 5: | ||
H. C. Nix, Site Generh1 Manager cc.w/encls 1.-2, 3, 4, and 5: | H. C. Nix, Site Generh1 Manager cc.w/encls 1.-2, 3, 4, and 5: | ||
| Line 65: | Line 71: | ||
Document Control Desk bec wIencls 1 and 5: | Document Control Desk bec wIencls 1 and 5: | ||
Operator Licensing Branch, DLPQ:NRR i | Operator Licensing Branch, DLPQ:NRR i | ||
l | ( | ||
l i | |||
i i | |||
1 i | 1 i | ||
RII | RII RI RII R11 CCa "SMde M/ man n les GHopp r:btm 8/>bto | ||
/89 8/g/89 | |||
u____m._.___ | /g/89 8/$F/89 I | ||
u____m._.___ | |||
._}} | |||
Latest revision as of 21:15, 1 December 2024
| ML20247C928 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Hatch  |
| Issue date: | 09/06/1989 |
| From: | Peebles T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | Hairston W GEORGIA POWER CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20247C933 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8909140130 | |
| Download: ML20247C928 (2) | |
Text
-
.a
..g
. s.1
- q.y September 6, 1989 Georgia Power Company LATTN: Mr.. W.: G. Hairston,.III Senior Vice: President-
. Nuclear 0perations:
y 40; Inverness Center Parkway
.P. 0.; Box 1295-Birmingham, AL 35201' Gentlemen:.
SUBJECT:
EXAMINATION. REPORT'. 50-321/0L-89-01' On June 12.
16, 1989, the;NRC administered examinations to employees of-your
. company who had; applied for licenses. to operate your E. I. Hatch facility. ' At
' the' conclusion of :the. examination, the examination questions and.~ preliminary findings were discussed with those members of your. staff identified in the enclosed report.
1 Your attentionJis invited to tw'o specific areas of concern. -As detailed.in
'the.Examinatic,n. Report. your pre-examination review was ineffective in -
ensuring site-specific examination validity and, the operator generic weak-
.nesses that were noted during the operating. examinations.
Further management
. attention istneeded to eliminate'these concerns, r
In 'accordance with 10.CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of
' this letter and the enclosures will be pitced in the NRC Public Document Room.
Should you have any questions concerning this examination, please contact us.
i Sincerely, (original signed by T. A. Peebles)
Thomas A. Peebles, Chief Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety
Enclosures:
'1.. Report Details
' 2.
Examination (s) and Answer Key (s) (SR0/R0)
~
3.
Facility Comments
'4.
NRC Resolution of Comments 5.
Simulation Facility Report
- cc w/ enc 1 1:
(See page 2)
~
'8909140130 890906 PDR ADOCK 05000321 V
PDC f
kl y[
......m.
J
[
Georgia Power Company 2
September 6, 1989 cc w/ enc 1 1:
State of Georgia cc w/ enc 1s 1 and 5:
H. C. Nix, Site Generh1 Manager cc.w/encls 1.-2, 3, 4, and 5:
C. Coggins, Manager of Training bec w/ enc 1 1:
L. Crocker, NRR K.~Brockman, DRP J. Menning, Hatch Senior Resident Inspector G. Hopper, DRS bec w/encls 1, 2,'3, 4, and 5:
Document Control Desk bec wIencls 1 and 5:
Operator Licensing Branch, DLPQ:NRR i
(
l i
i i
1 i
RII RI RII R11 CCa "SMde M/ man n les GHopp r:btm 8/>bto
/89 8/g/89
/g/89 8/$F/89 I
u____m._.___
._