ML22174A039

Ile ES-201-2 Outline Quality Checklist

ML22174A039
Person / Time
Site:	Braidwood
Issue date:	12/20/2019
From:	Randy Baker NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
To:	Exelon Generation Co
Baker R
Shared Package
ML19121A241	List: BW190114, Ile Outline Submittal Letter ML22174A039 ML22174A040 ML22174A060 ML22174A067 ML22174A069 ML22174A073
References
Download: ML22174A039 (1)

Text

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: \\\\~l~°"- <:"'(f'l'ttotJ Date of Examination: tWr.t/:J!I~ '().o-'l.iJ Initials Item Task Description a

b*

c**

1.

a.

Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401 N.

\\_ ~ re~

w

b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with

~

4?> ~~

R Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401 N and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled.

I T

c. Assess whether the outline overemphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.

I\\__ ~ ~

T E

d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate.

~ ~ ~

N

....__)

2.

a.

Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of

~ ~

normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major V'°'~

s transients.

I M

b.

Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and u

mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule

~ ~

L without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at

~

A least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the T

applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.

0 To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conforms with the qualitative and R

C.

~

quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D and in

~

?~

Section D.5, "Specific Instructions for the 'Simulator Operating Test,"' of ES-301 (including overlap).

3.

a. Verify that the systems walkthrough outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:

(1)

The outline(s) contains the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed w

among the safety functions as specified on the form.

1 A

(2)

Task repetition from the last two NRG examinations is within the limits specified on the form.

~

t?~

L (3)

No tasks are duplicated from the applicant's audit test(s).

K (4)

The number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form.

T (5)

The number of alternate-path, low-power, emergency, and radiologically controlled area H

tasks meets the criteria on the form.

R 0

b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:

~ ~

u (1)

The tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form.

~

G (2)

At least one task is new or significantly modified.

H (3)

No more than one task is repeated from the last two NRG licensing examinations.

C.

Determine whether there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of ~ t, ~

applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.

4.

a.

Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including probabilistic risk assessment and individual \\ I/" I~

plant examination insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.

G

~ ~ ~,

E

b. Assess whether the 1 O CFR 55.41, 55.43, and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.

N Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.

_\\ ~ m E

c.

R

d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections and the last two NRG exams.

r-..:_~ ~ ~

A

~ ~

~)

L

e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.

f.

Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).

~

.(J i:lr."2-..,

~.\\l'e_ e Printed NameLSinnature Date Author

'Y1..>.~ \\,\\;*,o~ _ /'.r-t---J/ I IL -- C----

J-z/[?l_zo;c,

a.

b.

Facility Reviewer (*)

)1..,.. '5c.k.A.r...1k

[ I c:-;, /,

.~

---.:___}

~

C.

NRG Chief Examiner(#)

1:::.-.~~-

\\.__,.,l,,. J ~

- V ~

/ 72'.Li O <'.Ll.._ _

I'd

d.

NRG Supervisor

~

<Z.\\,ert 1 Ofl,\\.'nw,;\\* I //-.Iv, n

.J.

tl./uli.r:,.~

I

[I I

• Not applicable for NRG-prepared examination outlines.

1. The independent NRG reviewer initials items in column "c"; the chief examiner's concurrence is required.