ML22174A039: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot insert |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot change |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:ES-201 | {{#Wiki_filter:ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 | ||
: 1. | |||
Facility: \\\\~l~°"- <:"'(f'l'ttotJ Date of Examination: tWr.t/:J!I~ '().o-'l.iJ | |||
w | |||
I T | Item Task Description a b* c** Initials | ||
: 1. a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401 N. \\_ ~ re ~ | |||
w b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with ~ 4?> ~ ~ | |||
E | R Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401 N and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled. | ||
N | I T c. Assess whether the outline overemphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. I\\__ ~ ~ | ||
T E d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate. ~ ~ ~ | |||
: 2. | N....__) | ||
normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major | : 2. a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of ~ ~ | ||
normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major V'°'~ | |||
I | s transients. | ||
I are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and M b. Assess whether there the expected crew composition and rotation schedule ~ ~ | |||
u | u mix of applicants in accordance with and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at ~ | ||
T | L without compromising exam integrity, A least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the T applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days. | ||
0 | 0 To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conforms with the qualitative and R C. ~ quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D and in ~ ?~ | ||
Section D.5, "Specific Instructions for the 'Simulator Operating Test,"' of ES-301 (including overlap). | |||
: 3. a. Verify that the systems walkthrough outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2: | |||
: 3. | (1) The outline(s) contains the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed w among the safety functions as specified on the form. 1 A (2) Task repetition from the last two NRG examinations is within the limits specified on the form. ~ t?~ | ||
(1) The outline(s) contains the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed w | L (3) No tasks are duplicated from the applicant's audit test(s). | ||
K (4) The number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form. | |||
T (5) The number of alternate-path, low-power, emergency, and radiologically controlled area H tasks meets the criteria on the form. | |||
A | R the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1: ~ ~ | ||
L | 0 b. Verify that among the topics as specified on the form. ~ | ||
K | u (1) The tasks are distributed least one task is new or significantly modified. | ||
T | G (2) At repeated from the last two NRG licensing examinations. | ||
R | H (3) No more than one task is | ||
C. Determine whether there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of ~ t, ~ | |||
applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days. | |||
: 4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including probabilistic risk assessment and individual \\ I/" | |||
plant examination insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections. I~ | |||
C. Determine whether there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days. | G ~ ~ ~, O CFR 55.41, 55.43, and 55.45 sampling is appropriate. | ||
4. | E b. Assess whether the 1 N Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5. _\\ ~ m E c. | ||
R d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections and the last two NRG exams. r-..:_~ ~ ~ | |||
A ~ ~ ~) | |||
L e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage. | |||
: f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO). ~.(J i:lr."2-.., | |||
Nam eLSinn ature Date | |||
: a. Author 'Y 1~. \\l'e_ e Printed..>.~ \\,\\ ;*,o~ _ /'.r-t---J/ I IL -- C----... J-z/[?l_zo;c, | |||
L | : b. Facility Reviewer (*) )1..,.. '5 c.k.A.r...1k [ I c:-;, /,.~ ---.:___} ~ | ||
: f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO). | C. NRG Chief Examiner(#) 1:::.-.~~- \\.__,.,l,,. J ~ - V ~ / 72'.Li O <'.Ll..__ I'd | ||
: d. NRG Supervisor.... ~ <Z.\\,ert 1 O.. I [I I fl,\\.'nw,;\\* I //-.Iv, n.J. tl. /uli.r:,.~ | |||
: a. Author | |||
: b. Facility Reviewer (*) | |||
1:::.-.~~- | |||
d. | |||
NRG Supervisor | |||
1 | |||
* Not applicable for NRG-prepared examination outlines. | * Not applicable for NRG-prepared examination outlines. | ||
# The independent NRG reviewer initials items in column "c"; the chief examiner's concurrence is required.}} | # The independent NRG reviewer initials items in column "c"; the chief examiner's concurrence is required.}} | ||
Revision as of 19:27, 17 November 2024
| ML22174A039 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Braidwood  |
| Issue date: | 12/20/2019 |
| From: | Randy Baker NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB |
| To: | Exelon Generation Co |
| Baker R | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19121A241 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML22174A039 (1) | |
Text
ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2
Facility: \\\\~l~°"- <:"'(f'l'ttotJ Date of Examination: tWr.t/:J!I~ '().o-'l.iJ
Item Task Description a b* c** Initials
- 1. a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401 N. \\_ ~ re ~
w b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with ~ 4?> ~ ~
R Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401 N and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled.
I T c. Assess whether the outline overemphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. I\\__ ~ ~
T E d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate. ~ ~ ~
N....__)
- 2. a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of ~ ~
normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major V'°'~
s transients.
I are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and M b. Assess whether there the expected crew composition and rotation schedule ~ ~
u mix of applicants in accordance with and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at ~
L without compromising exam integrity, A least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the T applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.
0 To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conforms with the qualitative and R C. ~ quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D and in ~ ?~
Section D.5, "Specific Instructions for the 'Simulator Operating Test,"' of ES-301 (including overlap).
- 3. a. Verify that the systems walkthrough outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:
(1) The outline(s) contains the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed w among the safety functions as specified on the form. 1 A (2) Task repetition from the last two NRG examinations is within the limits specified on the form. ~ t?~
L (3) No tasks are duplicated from the applicant's audit test(s).
K (4) The number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form.
T (5) The number of alternate-path, low-power, emergency, and radiologically controlled area H tasks meets the criteria on the form.
R the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1: ~ ~
0 b. Verify that among the topics as specified on the form. ~
u (1) The tasks are distributed least one task is new or significantly modified.
G (2) At repeated from the last two NRG licensing examinations.
H (3) No more than one task is
C. Determine whether there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of ~ t, ~
applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.
- 4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including probabilistic risk assessment and individual \\ I/"
plant examination insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections. I~
G ~ ~ ~, O CFR 55.41, 55.43, and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.
E b. Assess whether the 1 N Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5. _\\ ~ m E c.
R d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections and the last two NRG exams. r-..:_~ ~ ~
A ~ ~ ~)
L e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.
Nam eLSinn ature Date
- a. Author 'Y 1~. \\l'e_ e Printed..>.~ \\,\\ ;*,o~ _ /'.r-t---J/ I IL -- C----... J-z/[?l_zo;c,
- b. Facility Reviewer (*) )1..,.. '5 c.k.A.r...1k [ I c:-;, /,.~ ---.:___} ~
C. NRG Chief Examiner(#) 1:::.-.~~- \\.__,.,l,,. J ~ - V ~ / 72'.Li O <'.Ll..__ I'd
- d. NRG Supervisor.... ~ <Z.\\,ert 1 O.. I [I I fl,\\.'nw,;\\* I //-.Iv, n.J. tl. /uli.r:,.~
- Not applicable for NRG-prepared examination outlines.
- The independent NRG reviewer initials items in column "c"; the chief examiner's concurrence is required.