ML23045A119: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
StriderTol Bot change
StriderTol Bot change
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:N°     FS1-0060561            Rev. 1.0         Browns Ferry Unit 2 Cycle 23 Safety Limit Analysis Handling: NONE               Page 6/15                   (Non-Proprietary) for the assemblies experiencing fluence gradients outside the bounds of the measurement database was augmented with the same approach as demonstrated in the Response to SNPB RAI-6 in Reference 7.
{{#Wiki_filter:N° FS1-0 060561 Rev. 1.0 Browns Ferry Unit 2 Cycle 23 Safety Limit Analysis Handling: NONE Page 6/15 (Non-Proprietary)
The ACE/ATRIUM 11 critical power correlation (Reference 8) is used for the ATRIUM 11 fuel assemblies and the ACE/ATRIUM 10XM critical power correlation (Reference 9) is used for the ATRIUM 10XM fuel assemblies. The fuel- and plant-related uncertainties used in the BFE2-23 SLMCPR analysis are presented in Table 1. The radial and nodal power uncertainties used in the analysis include the effects of up to 50 % of the local power range monitors (LPRM) out-of-service, up to 18 traveling in-core probe (TIP) channels out-of-service, and a 2,500 effective full power hour (EFPH) LPRM calibration interval.
 
for the assemblies experiencing fluence gradients outside the bounds of the measurement database was augmented with the same approach as demonstrated in the Response to SNPB RAI-6 in Reference 7.
 
The ACE/ATRIUM 11 critical power correlation (Reference 8) is used for the ATRIUM 1 1 fuel assemblies and the ACE/ATRIUM 10XM critical power correlation (Reference 9) is used for the ATRIUM 10XM fuel assemblies. The fuel-and plant-r elated uncertainties used in the BFE2-23 SLMCPR analysis are presented in Table 1. The radial and nodal power u ncertainties used in the analysis include the effects of up to 50 % of the local power range monitors (LPRM) out-o f-service, up to 18 traveling in-c ore probe (TIP) channels out-o f-service, a nd a 2,500 effective full power hour ( EFPH) LPRM calibration interval.
 
[
[
                                      ]
 
Both the ACE/ATRIUM 11 (Reference 8) and the ACE/ATRIUM 10XM (Reference 9) critical power correlations have an SER restriction limiting the local peaking factor to [     ] Fuel expected to be resident in BFE2-23 has been designed to be below this limit. The maximum local peaking factor for the fresh ATRIUM 11 lattice is [         ] During each Monte Carlo trial of the SLMCPR calculation, all fuel rods in each assembly are evaluated using perturbed input parameters and the appropriate critical power correlation to determine the number of rods predicted to be in boiling transition. Key input parameters perturbed include nodal power, [                                                             ] and assembly flow, etc. [
]
                                                                    ] The base additive constant uncertainty}}
 
Both the ACE/ATRIUM 11 (Reference 8) and the ACE/ATRIUM 10XM (Reference 9) critical power
 
correlations have an SER restriction limiting the local peaking factor to [ ] Fuel expected to be resident in BFE2-23 has been designed to be below this limit. The maximum local peaking factor f or the
 
fresh ATRIUM 11 lattice is [ ] During each Monte Carlo trial of t he SLMCPR calculation, all fuel rods in each assembly are evaluated using perturbed input parameters and the appropriate critical power correlation to determine the number of r ods predicted to be in boiling transition. Key input parameters perturbed include nodal power, [ ] and assembly flow, etc. [
 
] The base additive constant uncertainty}}

Revision as of 08:07, 15 November 2024

Proprietary Determination Letter Enclosure - Browns Ferry Atrium 11 LAR Supp. 6
ML23045A119
Person / Time
Site: Browns Ferry  
Issue date: 02/15/2023
From: Kimberly Green
Plant Licensing Branch II
To:
Framatome
Green K
References
EPID L-2021-LLA-0132
Download: ML23045A119 (1)


Text

N° FS1-0 060561 Rev. 1.0 Browns Ferry Unit 2 Cycle 23 Safety Limit Analysis Handling: NONE Page 6/15 (Non-Proprietary)

for the assemblies experiencing fluence gradients outside the bounds of the measurement database was augmented with the same approach as demonstrated in the Response to SNPB RAI-6 in Reference 7.

The ACE/ATRIUM 11 critical power correlation (Reference 8) is used for the ATRIUM 1 1 fuel assemblies and the ACE/ATRIUM 10XM critical power correlation (Reference 9) is used for the ATRIUM 10XM fuel assemblies. The fuel-and plant-r elated uncertainties used in the BFE2-23 SLMCPR analysis are presented in Table 1. The radial and nodal power u ncertainties used in the analysis include the effects of up to 50 % of the local power range monitors (LPRM) out-o f-service, up to 18 traveling in-c ore probe (TIP) channels out-o f-service, a nd a 2,500 effective full power hour ( EFPH) LPRM calibration interval.

[

]

Both the ACE/ATRIUM 11 (Reference 8) and the ACE/ATRIUM 10XM (Reference 9) critical power

correlations have an SER restriction limiting the local peaking factor to [ ] Fuel expected to be resident in BFE2-23 has been designed to be below this limit. The maximum local peaking factor f or the

fresh ATRIUM 11 lattice is [ ] During each Monte Carlo trial of t he SLMCPR calculation, all fuel rods in each assembly are evaluated using perturbed input parameters and the appropriate critical power correlation to determine the number of r ods predicted to be in boiling transition. Key input parameters perturbed include nodal power, [ ] and assembly flow, etc. [

] The base additive constant uncertainty