ML21354A833: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot change)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:}}
{{#Wiki_filter:January 6, 2022 MEMORANDUM TO:                Steven Lynch, Chief Advanced Reactor Policy Branch Division of Advanced Reactors and Non-Power Production and Utilization Facilities Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Signed by Sebros FROM:                        Joseph M. Sebrosky, Senior Project Manager                    on 01/06/22 Advanced Reactor Policy Branch Division of Advanced Reactors and Non-Power Production and Utilization Facilities Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
 
==SUBJECT:==
 
==SUMMARY==
OF DECEMBER 14, 2021, PUBLIC MEETING TO DISCUSS TECHNOLOGY INCLUSIVE CONTENT OF APPLICATION PROJECT On December 14, 2021, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff held a public meeting with stakeholders to discuss the technology inclusive content of application project (TICAP). The meeting notice is available in the NRCs Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) at Accession No. ML21344A142, and the presentation slides are available at ADAMS Accession No. ML21344A006. The enclosure to this summary provides the attendees for the meeting as captured by Microsoft Teams.
The purpose of this meeting was to discuss with stakeholders issues related to the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) Technical Report 21-07, Revision 0-B, Technology Inclusive Guidance for Non-Light Water Reactors Safety Analysis Report Content for Applicants Using the NEI 18-04 Methodology (ADAMS Accession No. ML21343A292). This meeting was a follow-on meeting to previous public TICAP meetings held on:
May 11, 2021 (meeting summary available in ADAMS at Accession No. ML21132A295)
May 19, 2021 (meeting summary available in ADAMS at Accession No. ML21154A290)
May 26, 2021 (meeting summary available in ADAMS at Accession No. ML21158A223)
June 23, 2021 (meeting summary available in ADAMS at Accession No. ML21181A335)
August 17, 2021 (meeting summary available in ADAMS at Accession No. ML21245A442)
October 5, 2021 (meeting summary available in ADAMS at Accession No. ML21301A189)
November 9, 2021 (meeting summary available in ADAMS at Accession No. ML21328A233)
CONTACT: Joseph Sebrosky, NRR/DANU 301-415-1132
 
S. Lynch                                            2 During the meeting, the NRC staff referred to the TICAP Regulatory Guide draft white paper dated December 2, 2021, (ADAMS Accession No. ML21336A697) that provided an update to an earlier version of the draft white paper based on the staffs review of NEI 21-07, Revision 0 (ADAMS Accession No. ML21250A378). The NRC staff and industry also discussed NEI 21-07, Revision 0-B that was provided to the staff on December 8, 2021. The December 8, 2021, document included changes to address NRC staff comments provided to industry that were discussed during the November 9, 2021, TICAP meeting referenced above.
Meeting Highlights The NRC staff outlined its position on developing principal design criteria (PDC) using a licensing modernization project (LMP) based approach and provided a set of recommendations for industry to consider in the next revision to NEI 21-07. Highlights of the NRC staffs PDC position included:
o  The NRC staffs position is that the requirement to propose PDCs extends to the scope of PDC (i.e., design, fabrication, testing, inspection, and performance requirements) and that applicants may request an exemption if the proposed PDCs do not fully address the scope of PDC.
o  In addition, NRC staff clarified that to ensure proposed PDC covered the required important to safety structures, systems, and components (SSCs), the LMP-developed PDCs must address both safety-related SSCs and non-safety related with special treatment SSCs. Further, the NRC staff stated that the proposed two-tiered PDC complimentary design criteria (CDC) approach outlined in NEI 21-07 should be consolidated into just PDCs (e.g., could include PDC Type A and PDC Type B).
o  To meet the underlying requirement for the development of PDC, the NRC staff stated that the PDC must cover the scope of the general design criteria (GDC) found in Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 50 Appendix A including SSCs considered important to safety and PDC associated with normal operations (e.g., design criteria to ensure normal effluent release requirements, and occupational dose requirements are met).
Industry stated that it would consider the NRC staffs position and would provide a plan to the staff in early January on how it intends to address the issue. The plan will be discussed in the next TICAP public meeting tentatively scheduled for January 18, 2022.
Another high-priority item for the meeting was the level of information to be captured in the safety analysis report (SAR) relative to anticipated operational occurrences (AOO), design basis events (DBE), and beyond design basis events (BDBE).
o  The NRC staffs position is that the SAR should contain important supporting data that is significant to the development of the AOO, DBE, and BDBE analyses conclusions regarding risk significance, meeting frequency consequence curve targets or quantitative health objectives (QHOs), developing SSC classification, or evaluating defense-in-depth.
The NRC staff stated that such information is needed in the SAR to support its regulatory findings and to ensure important information is captured in the SAR to assess changes to the plant made during the operational phase.
 
S. Lynch                                          3 o  Industry stated that this information is captured in the probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) and it is not necessary to elevate this information to the SAR.
o  The NRC staff and industry agreed to develop examples, potentially using the outcome of recent TICAP tabletop exercises, to identify significant supporting AOO, DBE, and BDBE data that should be captured in the SAR.
Other action items from the meeting included:
o  Industry will provide comments on the NRC staffs draft TICAP regulatory guide white paper prior to the next TICAP meeting.
o  NRC staff will provide feedback on which of the staffs proposed exceptions, clarifications, and additions associated with NEI 21-07 are resolved based on the December 8, 2021, NEI 21-07 revision 0-B.
 
==Enclosure:==
 
Attendance List
 
S. Lynch                                  4
 
==SUBJECT:==
 
==SUMMARY==
OF DECEMBER 14, 2021, PUBLIC MEETING TO DISCUSS TECHNOLOGY INCLUSIVE CONTENT OF APPLICATION PROJECT DATED: JANUARY 6, 2022 DISTRIBUTION:
PUBLIC RidsNrrDanu Resource RidsNrrDanuUarp Resource JSegala SLynch JSebrosky EOesterle ADAMS Accession Number: ML21354A833                        NRC-001 OFFICE  NRR/DANU/UARP/PM      NRR/DANU/UARP/BC    NRR/DANU/UARP/PM NAME    JSebrosky              SLynch              JSebrosky DATE    12/21/2021            1/6/2022            1/6/2022 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
 
December 14, 2021, Public Meeting to Discuss Technology Inclusive Content of Application Project Attendance List*
NAME                AFFILIATION              NAME                    AFFILIATION John Segala        NRC/NRR/DANU              Amir Afzali            Southern Company Martin Stutzke      NRC/NRR/DANU              Brandon Chisholm      Southern Company Steven Lynch        NRC/NRR/DANU/UARP        Ben Holtzman          Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI)
William Reckley    NRC/NRR/DANU/UARP        Cyril Draffin          U.S. Nuclear Industry Council Eric Oesterle      NRC/NRR/DANU/UARP        Steven Nesbit          LMNT Consulting Jordan Hoellman    NRC/NRR/DANU/UARP        Ed Wallace            GNBC Associates Joe Sebrosky        NRC/NRR/DANU/UARP        Neil Haggerty          Excel Prosanta            NRC/NRR/DANU/UARP        Frank Akstulewicz      A to Z Reactor Chowdhury                                                            Consulting Services Maryam Khan        NRC/NRR/DANU/UARP        Dennis Henneke        GE Power Stephen Philpott    NRC/NRR/DANU/UARP        Denise Brooks          GE Power Arlon Costa        NRC/NRR/DANU/UARP        Scott Ingalls          GE Power Amy Cubbage        NRC/NRR/DANU/UARP        Karl Fleming          KNF Consulting Binesh Tharakan    NRC/NRR/DANU/UARP        Raymond Wang          X-energy Beth Reed          NRC/NRR/DANU/UARP        Jon Facemire          X-energy Michael Orenak      NRR/NRR/DANU/UTB1        Brandon Hartle        X-energy Hosung Ahn          NRC/NRR/DANU/UTB1        Steve Vaughn          X-energy Alexander          NRC/NRR/DANU/UTB1        Charlotte Geiger      X-energy Chereskin Alexandra Siwy      NRC/NRR/DANU/UTB2        George Wilson          TerraPower Jeffrey Schmidt    NRC/NRR/DANU/UTB2        Bryan Eyers            TerraPower Ben Adams          NRC/NRR/DANU/UTB1        Ryan Sprengel          TerraPower Christopher Van    NRC/NRR/DANU/UTB1        Sean Morrell          NuScale Wert Timothy Lupold      NRC/NRR/DANU/UTB1        Amanda Spalding        Westinghouse Ian Jung            NRC/NRR/DANU/UTB1        George Flanagan        ORNL Ed Miller          NRC/NRR/DORL/LPL2-1      William Winslow        U.S. Army Robert Roche-      NRC/RES/DE/RGPMB          Andrew Zach            Senate Committee on Rivera                                                              Environment and Public Works Shakur Walker      NRC/COMM/DW              Dave Grabaskas        Argonne National Lab Henry Marchiewski  OCHCO/ADHRTD/NRANB        Adam Stein            Breakthrough Institute Scott Bussey        OCHCO/ADHRTD/RTTB        Farshid Shahrokhi      Not Available (NA)
Bob Weisman        NRC/OGC                  Richard Paese          NA Carolyn Wolf        NRC/OCA                  Frank Schaaf          NA Derek Widmayer      NRC/ACRS                  Lisa Peterson          NA Jim Kinsey          INL                      Tom Seewald            NA Chris Chwasz        INL                      Paul Loza              NA Tom King            INL                      Ben Chen              NA Tom Hicks          INL                      Rob Burg              NA Ewa Muzikova        NA                        Jason Andrus          NA Enclosure
 
NAME                AFFILIATION                NAME                        AFFILIATION Steven Pope          NA                          Alan Levin                NA Martin ONeill      NA                          Chris Robinson            NA Robert Youngblood NA                            Kiersten Smith            NA Don Williams        NA                          Kurt Harris                NA Altheia Wyche        NA                          Cindy Williams            NA Mike Tschiltz        NA                          Bruce Weir                NA Ian Gifford          NA
* Attendance list based on Microsoft Teams Participant list. List does not include 7 individuals that connected via phone.
2}}

Latest revision as of 10:04, 18 January 2022

Summary of December 14, 2021, Public Meeting to Discuss Technology Inclusive Content of Application Project
ML21354A833
Person / Time
Issue date: 01/06/2022
From: Joseph Sebrosky
NRC/NRR/DANU/UARP
To: Steven Lynch
NRC/NRR/DANU/UARP
Sebrosky J; 240-500-0614
References
Download: ML21354A833 (6)


Text

January 6, 2022 MEMORANDUM TO: Steven Lynch, Chief Advanced Reactor Policy Branch Division of Advanced Reactors and Non-Power Production and Utilization Facilities Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Signed by Sebros FROM: Joseph M. Sebrosky, Senior Project Manager on 01/06/22 Advanced Reactor Policy Branch Division of Advanced Reactors and Non-Power Production and Utilization Facilities Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

OF DECEMBER 14, 2021, PUBLIC MEETING TO DISCUSS TECHNOLOGY INCLUSIVE CONTENT OF APPLICATION PROJECT On December 14, 2021, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff held a public meeting with stakeholders to discuss the technology inclusive content of application project (TICAP). The meeting notice is available in the NRCs Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) at Accession No. ML21344A142, and the presentation slides are available at ADAMS Accession No. ML21344A006. The enclosure to this summary provides the attendees for the meeting as captured by Microsoft Teams.

The purpose of this meeting was to discuss with stakeholders issues related to the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) Technical Report 21-07, Revision 0-B, Technology Inclusive Guidance for Non-Light Water Reactors Safety Analysis Report Content for Applicants Using the NEI 18-04 Methodology (ADAMS Accession No. ML21343A292). This meeting was a follow-on meeting to previous public TICAP meetings held on:

May 11, 2021 (meeting summary available in ADAMS at Accession No. ML21132A295)

May 19, 2021 (meeting summary available in ADAMS at Accession No. ML21154A290)

May 26, 2021 (meeting summary available in ADAMS at Accession No. ML21158A223)

June 23, 2021 (meeting summary available in ADAMS at Accession No. ML21181A335)

August 17, 2021 (meeting summary available in ADAMS at Accession No. ML21245A442)

October 5, 2021 (meeting summary available in ADAMS at Accession No. ML21301A189)

November 9, 2021 (meeting summary available in ADAMS at Accession No. ML21328A233)

CONTACT: Joseph Sebrosky, NRR/DANU 301-415-1132

S. Lynch 2 During the meeting, the NRC staff referred to the TICAP Regulatory Guide draft white paper dated December 2, 2021, (ADAMS Accession No. ML21336A697) that provided an update to an earlier version of the draft white paper based on the staffs review of NEI 21-07, Revision 0 (ADAMS Accession No. ML21250A378). The NRC staff and industry also discussed NEI 21-07, Revision 0-B that was provided to the staff on December 8, 2021. The December 8, 2021, document included changes to address NRC staff comments provided to industry that were discussed during the November 9, 2021, TICAP meeting referenced above.

Meeting Highlights The NRC staff outlined its position on developing principal design criteria (PDC) using a licensing modernization project (LMP) based approach and provided a set of recommendations for industry to consider in the next revision to NEI 21-07. Highlights of the NRC staffs PDC position included:

o The NRC staffs position is that the requirement to propose PDCs extends to the scope of PDC (i.e., design, fabrication, testing, inspection, and performance requirements) and that applicants may request an exemption if the proposed PDCs do not fully address the scope of PDC.

o In addition, NRC staff clarified that to ensure proposed PDC covered the required important to safety structures, systems, and components (SSCs), the LMP-developed PDCs must address both safety-related SSCs and non-safety related with special treatment SSCs. Further, the NRC staff stated that the proposed two-tiered PDC complimentary design criteria (CDC) approach outlined in NEI 21-07 should be consolidated into just PDCs (e.g., could include PDC Type A and PDC Type B).

o To meet the underlying requirement for the development of PDC, the NRC staff stated that the PDC must cover the scope of the general design criteria (GDC) found in Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 50 Appendix A including SSCs considered important to safety and PDC associated with normal operations (e.g., design criteria to ensure normal effluent release requirements, and occupational dose requirements are met).

Industry stated that it would consider the NRC staffs position and would provide a plan to the staff in early January on how it intends to address the issue. The plan will be discussed in the next TICAP public meeting tentatively scheduled for January 18, 2022.

Another high-priority item for the meeting was the level of information to be captured in the safety analysis report (SAR) relative to anticipated operational occurrences (AOO), design basis events (DBE), and beyond design basis events (BDBE).

o The NRC staffs position is that the SAR should contain important supporting data that is significant to the development of the AOO, DBE, and BDBE analyses conclusions regarding risk significance, meeting frequency consequence curve targets or quantitative health objectives (QHOs), developing SSC classification, or evaluating defense-in-depth.

The NRC staff stated that such information is needed in the SAR to support its regulatory findings and to ensure important information is captured in the SAR to assess changes to the plant made during the operational phase.

S. Lynch 3 o Industry stated that this information is captured in the probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) and it is not necessary to elevate this information to the SAR.

o The NRC staff and industry agreed to develop examples, potentially using the outcome of recent TICAP tabletop exercises, to identify significant supporting AOO, DBE, and BDBE data that should be captured in the SAR.

Other action items from the meeting included:

o Industry will provide comments on the NRC staffs draft TICAP regulatory guide white paper prior to the next TICAP meeting.

o NRC staff will provide feedback on which of the staffs proposed exceptions, clarifications, and additions associated with NEI 21-07 are resolved based on the December 8, 2021, NEI 21-07 revision 0-B.

Enclosure:

Attendance List

S. Lynch 4

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

OF DECEMBER 14, 2021, PUBLIC MEETING TO DISCUSS TECHNOLOGY INCLUSIVE CONTENT OF APPLICATION PROJECT DATED: JANUARY 6, 2022 DISTRIBUTION:

PUBLIC RidsNrrDanu Resource RidsNrrDanuUarp Resource JSegala SLynch JSebrosky EOesterle ADAMS Accession Number: ML21354A833 NRC-001 OFFICE NRR/DANU/UARP/PM NRR/DANU/UARP/BC NRR/DANU/UARP/PM NAME JSebrosky SLynch JSebrosky DATE 12/21/2021 1/6/2022 1/6/2022 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

December 14, 2021, Public Meeting to Discuss Technology Inclusive Content of Application Project Attendance List*

NAME AFFILIATION NAME AFFILIATION John Segala NRC/NRR/DANU Amir Afzali Southern Company Martin Stutzke NRC/NRR/DANU Brandon Chisholm Southern Company Steven Lynch NRC/NRR/DANU/UARP Ben Holtzman Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI)

William Reckley NRC/NRR/DANU/UARP Cyril Draffin U.S. Nuclear Industry Council Eric Oesterle NRC/NRR/DANU/UARP Steven Nesbit LMNT Consulting Jordan Hoellman NRC/NRR/DANU/UARP Ed Wallace GNBC Associates Joe Sebrosky NRC/NRR/DANU/UARP Neil Haggerty Excel Prosanta NRC/NRR/DANU/UARP Frank Akstulewicz A to Z Reactor Chowdhury Consulting Services Maryam Khan NRC/NRR/DANU/UARP Dennis Henneke GE Power Stephen Philpott NRC/NRR/DANU/UARP Denise Brooks GE Power Arlon Costa NRC/NRR/DANU/UARP Scott Ingalls GE Power Amy Cubbage NRC/NRR/DANU/UARP Karl Fleming KNF Consulting Binesh Tharakan NRC/NRR/DANU/UARP Raymond Wang X-energy Beth Reed NRC/NRR/DANU/UARP Jon Facemire X-energy Michael Orenak NRR/NRR/DANU/UTB1 Brandon Hartle X-energy Hosung Ahn NRC/NRR/DANU/UTB1 Steve Vaughn X-energy Alexander NRC/NRR/DANU/UTB1 Charlotte Geiger X-energy Chereskin Alexandra Siwy NRC/NRR/DANU/UTB2 George Wilson TerraPower Jeffrey Schmidt NRC/NRR/DANU/UTB2 Bryan Eyers TerraPower Ben Adams NRC/NRR/DANU/UTB1 Ryan Sprengel TerraPower Christopher Van NRC/NRR/DANU/UTB1 Sean Morrell NuScale Wert Timothy Lupold NRC/NRR/DANU/UTB1 Amanda Spalding Westinghouse Ian Jung NRC/NRR/DANU/UTB1 George Flanagan ORNL Ed Miller NRC/NRR/DORL/LPL2-1 William Winslow U.S. Army Robert Roche- NRC/RES/DE/RGPMB Andrew Zach Senate Committee on Rivera Environment and Public Works Shakur Walker NRC/COMM/DW Dave Grabaskas Argonne National Lab Henry Marchiewski OCHCO/ADHRTD/NRANB Adam Stein Breakthrough Institute Scott Bussey OCHCO/ADHRTD/RTTB Farshid Shahrokhi Not Available (NA)

Bob Weisman NRC/OGC Richard Paese NA Carolyn Wolf NRC/OCA Frank Schaaf NA Derek Widmayer NRC/ACRS Lisa Peterson NA Jim Kinsey INL Tom Seewald NA Chris Chwasz INL Paul Loza NA Tom King INL Ben Chen NA Tom Hicks INL Rob Burg NA Ewa Muzikova NA Jason Andrus NA Enclosure

NAME AFFILIATION NAME AFFILIATION Steven Pope NA Alan Levin NA Martin ONeill NA Chris Robinson NA Robert Youngblood NA Kiersten Smith NA Don Williams NA Kurt Harris NA Altheia Wyche NA Cindy Williams NA Mike Tschiltz NA Bruce Weir NA Ian Gifford NA

  • Attendance list based on Microsoft Teams Participant list. List does not include 7 individuals that connected via phone.

2