ML20138C198: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
Line 1: Line 1:
#REDIRECT [[IR 05000324/1986004]]
{{Adams
| number = ML20138C198
| issue date = 02/26/1986
| title = Insp Repts 50-324/86-04 & 50-325/86-03 on 860121-24. Violation Noted:Inadequate Fire Brigade Drills & Training & Failure to Implement Fire Protection Procedure FPP-013
| author name = Conlon T, Wiseman G
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
| addressee name =
| addressee affiliation =
| docket = 05000324, 05000325
| license number =
| contact person =
| document report number = 50-324-86-04, 50-324-86-4, 50-325-86-03, 50-325-86-3, NUDOCS 8604020392
| package number = ML20138C162
| document type = INSPECTION REPORT, NRC-GENERATED, INSPECTION REPORT, UTILITY, TEXT-INSPECTION & AUDIT & I&E CIRCULARS
| page count = 6
}}
See also: [[see also::IR 05000324/1986004]]
 
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:.
        j,a E e *                                  UNITED STATES
      c            *                    NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMisslON
                                                      REGION 11
    y              ,j                      101 MARIETTA STREET N.W.
    *              's                        ATLANTA, GEORGI A 30323
      %...../
    Report Nos.: 50-325/86-03 and 50-324/86-04
    Licensee:        Carolina Power and Light Company
                      P. O. Box 1551
                      Raleigh, NC 27602
    Docket Nos.: 50-325 and 50-324                          License Nos.: DPR-71 and DPR-62
    Facility Name: Brunswick 1 and 2
    Inspection Conducted: January 21-24, 1986
    Inspector:        k/l$Y, , .                w                            2 f"2 Er ) T(o
                    G. R. Wi s ema n' '    ' /
                                                                                  M te Sighed
    Approved by:            ku
                      T. Ef Eoniori, Sectionfhief-
                                                                                .N)M/b
                                                                                  Oate Sfgned
                      Plant Systems Section, Engineering Branch
                      Division of Reactor Safety
                                                  SUMMARY
    Scope:      This routine, unannounced inspection entailed 26 inspector-hours on site
i
    in the areas of Fire Protection / Prevention and followup on previously identified
    inspection items.
    -Results:        Two apparent violations were identified - Inadequate Fire Brigade
    Drills and Training - paragraph 5.b. and Failure to Implement Fire Protection
    Procedures FPP-013 - paragraph 6.a.
                  8604020392 860324
                  PDR    ADOCM 05000324
                  G                    PDR
                                                                                                _s
 
                                                                                              a
                                                                                                i
          '
  .
                                                                            REPORT DETAILS
1.  ' Persons Contacted
      Licensee Employees
    *E. A. Bishop, Manager Operations
    *J. W. Chase, Assistant to General Manager
    *C. R. Dietz, Plant General Manager
    *C. E. Enzor, Director Regulatory Compliance
    *R. J. Groover, Manager, Brunswick Construction Unit
    *J. R. Holder, Outage Manager
    *B. L. Parks, Engineering Supervisor
    *R. E. Porterfield, Senior Engineer - Fire Protection
    *R. M. Poulk, Jr., Senior Specialist - Regulatory Compliance
      A. Spencer, Training Specialist
    *J. D. Wilcox, Principal Engineer-0perations
    *T. H. Wyllie, Manager, Engineering and Construction
      Other licensee employees contacted included construction craf tsinen,
      engineers, technicians, operators, mechanics, security force members, and
      office personnel.
      Other Organizations
      R. E. Deacy, Fire Protection Engineer, Impell Corporation
      NRC Resident Inspectors
    '*W. H. Ruland
      *L. Garner
      * Attended exit interview
2.      Exit Interview
        The inspection scope and findings were summarized on January 24, 1986, with
        those persons indicated in paragraph 1 above. The inspector described the
        areas inspected and discussed in detail the inspection findings.                    No
        dissenting comments were received from the licensee.
        a.    ViolationItem(324/86-04-01and325/86-03-01), Inadequate Fire Brigade
              Drills and Training - parag' .2ph 5.b.
        b.    Violation Item (324/86-04-02 and 325/86-03-01), Failure to Implement
              Fire Protection Procedures FPP-013,' paragraph 6.
        The licensee did not identify-as proprietary any of the materials provided
        to or reviewed by the inspector during this inspection.
                                                                                                  1
              . - - - - _ - - - - . . . - . - . - - _ _ _ , . . _ _ . _ . .
 
        -
  .
                                          2
3.  Licensee' Action on Previous Enforcement Matters
    (Closed) Unresolved Item -(324/84-37-02 and 325/84-37-02), Surveillance
    Requirements of the Fire / Flame Impingement Barrier for Fire Pumps. Section
    7.8 of Surveillance Procedure PT-34.6.7.2, Revision 1, has been revised to
    include an' inspection of the fire / flame impingement barrier for the fire
    pumps on a 18-month frequency.
4.  Unresolved Items
    Unresolved items were not identified during the inspection.
5.  Fire Protection Prevention Program (64703)
    a.  Fire Prevention / Administrative Controls Procedures
          The inspector ' reviewed the following Fire Prevention / Administrative
          Proced res:
          Procedure No.                              Title
          FPP-003                                    Fire Brigade Training
          FPP-004                                    Fire Brigade Personnel Medical
                                                    -and Physical Qualifications
          FPP-007                                    Control and Use of Fire
                                                      Fighting Equipment
          FPP-013                                    Weekly Fire Inspection and
                                                      Plant Housekeeping
          FPP-014                                    Control of . Combustibles - and
                                                      Transient Loads
          FPP-017                                    Control of Cutting, Welding and
                                                      Grinding
          PFP-001                                    Pre-Fire Control Procedure
          PFP-013                                    General Fire Plan
          Based on this review, it appears that the above procedures meet the NRC
          Guidelines of:
          (1) The docurnent entitled " Nuclear Plant Fire Protection functional
                Responsibilities, Administrative Controls, and Quality Assurance"
                dated June 1977.
          (2) 10 CFR 50 Appendix R - Fire Protection Programs for Nuclear Power
                Facilities.
                                                                                      ,
 
    -
.
                                        3
  b.  Fire Brigade
      (1) Organizations-
            The plant fire brigade is composed of six shifts of fully dedi-
            cated fire brigade personnel. The fire brigade leader is normally
            a Senior Reactor Operator and the remaining fire brigade members
            are composed of Auxiliary Operators and a radwaste representative.
            The inspector reviewed the on-shift " fire brigade roster" for the
            dates January 8,1986 through January 22, 1986, and verified that a
            sufficient number of fire brigade personnel were on duty to meet
            the provisions of Technical Specification 6.2.2 for fire brigade
            operations and for plant operation.
      (2) Training
            The inspector reviewed the training records for six brigade Fire
            Chiefs and 13 fire brigade members assigned duty during the above
            period and found that four of the fire brigade members had not
            completed all quarterly fire brigade training and one brigade.
            member had not participated in the number of fire drills required
            by procedure FPP-003.      This is identified as Violation Item
            (324/86-04-01 and 325/86-03-01), Inadequate Fire Brigade Drills
            and Training. A sample of the records of the annual physical
            examinations and respirator training for the brigade members
            required by procedure FPP-004 were reviewed and found satisfac-
            tory.
        (3) Fire Brigade Equipment
            The inspector performed an inspection of the fire brigade equip-
            ment, consisting of fire hose, nozzles, tools, and miscellaneous
            equipment, stored at the fire brigade equipment response location
            located at the south fire equipment house.
            A total of 17 sets of turnout gear (coats, boots, helmets etc.),
            17 sets of self contained breathing apparatus, and 38 spare air
            cylinders are available.    Ten sets are located adjacent .to the
            main centrol room; two sets are in the radwaste control room; and
            five_ sets are at the south fire equipment house.
            Based on this inspection, the designated fire brigade equipment
            stored at the fire brigade equipment response locations appeared
              to be properly maintained and stored in a ready condition.
  Except as noted above, no additional violations or deviations were identi-
  fied within the areas inspected.
                                                                                  I
                                                                                _
 
        -
    .
                                            4
6 .'  Fire Protection / Prevention Program Implementation (64704)
      Plant Tours
      Plant tours were made by the inspector on both day and night shifts. At the
      time of the inspections Unit I was in full operation.and Unit 2 was in an
      extended outage. During the plant tours portions of the following plant
      areas.and .their related fire protection features were inspected:
      Diesel Generator Building - 2',    23', and 50' elevations
      Service Water Building - 4', 20' elevations
      Reactor Building Unit 2 - (-)17', 20' and 50' elevations
      Reactor Building Unit 1 - 20' - 50' Elevations and Refueling Floor Control
      Building - 23' and 49' elevations
      The inspector visually inspected the fire / smoke detection capabilities, and
      the manual firefighting equipment (i.e., portable extinguishers, hose
      stations, etc.) and the fire barrier walls associated with the above plant
      areas.
      Based on the visual inspection, it appears that the fire protection features
      associated with the above plant areas were properly maintained and fully
      functional, except that a number of fire doors in the diesel generator
      building were not in service. However, the licensee had established the LCO
      requirements of the Technical Specifications for these areas.
      The plant tours also reviewed the licensee's implementation of the fire
      protection administrative procedures. On January 22, 1986, the inspector
      and the Brunswick plant Fire Protection Engineer accompanied members of the
          -
      Fire Protection Support group during their conduction of a weekly fire
      inspection per the criteria of procedures FPP-013 and .FPP-014 of the Service
      Water Building and Diesel Generator Building. During this walkthrough the
      inspector observed a non fire-retardant wood crate, combustible cardboard
      and rubber gasketing material associated with Unit 2 maintenance work which
      had obstructed fire protection equipment in the Unit 1 area of the Service
      Water Building. Also identified was flammable oil accumulations on the
      floor, conduits and cable trays within the 2' elevation of the diesel
      generator building. These conditions were reported to the licensee.        The
      licensee's fire protection support group inspector during this walkthrough
      did not identify or note any of these conditions on the FPP-013 checklist.
      FPP-013 requires the inspectors to note any identified condition which could
      adversely affect the fire protection status of the area.        Failure to
      identify, and not correct the above mentioned conditions which are adverse
      to the fire protection of the area is considered a faihre to implement
      FPP-013. This constitutes a violation of Technical Specification 6.8.1.f,
      which requires that written procedures for the fire protection program be
      implemented and is identified as Violation Item (324/86-04-02 and
      325/86-03-02), Failure to Implement Fire Protection Procedure FPP-013.
                                                                                    -
 
        -
  -
                                        5
    Several _ welding operations were observed in the Unit-2 reactor building
    during outage maintenance activities. An approved " Hot Work" permit had
    been issued for the welding sites and the operations and fire prevention /
    protection practices generally met the licensee's fire prevention procedure
    requirements.
    The general housekeeping as a whole had deteriorated somewhat since the last
    NRC fire protection . inspection. This can be contributed to the Unit 2
    outage activities and the licensee's failure to identify and correct adverse
    housekeeping practices as identified _ by above Violation Item 324/86-04-02
    and 325/86-03-02.
    Except as noted above, no additional violations or deviations were identi-
    fied within the areas inspected.
7.  Inspector Followup Items
      (Closed) Inspector Followup Item, (324/84-37-01 and 325/84-37-01), Surveil-
    lance Testing for Eight Hour Battery Powered Emergency Lighting Units.
    Procedure PT-34.15.9.1 Revision 0, was issued on November 13, 1985, to
    provide semiannual physical inspection and lighting head positioning for all
    Appendix R Emergency Lighting . Units. In addition, this procedure provides
    for an 18-month battery capacity 8-hour discharge test for a 10% sample of
      the emergency lighting units. The scope of testing and schedule provided in
      the procedure appear acceptable.
                                                                                    1
                                                                                    !
                                                                                    i
                                                                                    ,
                                                                                  _
}}

Revision as of 03:06, 13 December 2021

Insp Repts 50-324/86-04 & 50-325/86-03 on 860121-24. Violation Noted:Inadequate Fire Brigade Drills & Training & Failure to Implement Fire Protection Procedure FPP-013
ML20138C198
Person / Time
Site: Brunswick  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 02/26/1986
From: Conlon T, Wiseman G
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20138C162 List:
References
50-324-86-04, 50-324-86-4, 50-325-86-03, 50-325-86-3, NUDOCS 8604020392
Download: ML20138C198 (6)


See also: IR 05000324/1986004

Text

.

j,a E e * UNITED STATES

c * NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMisslON

REGION 11

y ,j 101 MARIETTA STREET N.W.

  • 's ATLANTA, GEORGI A 30323

%...../

Report Nos.: 50-325/86-03 and 50-324/86-04

Licensee: Carolina Power and Light Company

P. O. Box 1551

Raleigh, NC 27602

Docket Nos.: 50-325 and 50-324 License Nos.: DPR-71 and DPR-62

Facility Name: Brunswick 1 and 2

Inspection Conducted: January 21-24, 1986

Inspector: k/l$Y, , . w 2 f"2 Er ) T(o

G. R. Wi s ema n' ' ' /

M te Sighed

Approved by: ku

T. Ef Eoniori, Sectionfhief-

.N)M/b

Oate Sfgned

Plant Systems Section, Engineering Branch

Division of Reactor Safety

SUMMARY

Scope: This routine, unannounced inspection entailed 26 inspector-hours on site

i

in the areas of Fire Protection / Prevention and followup on previously identified

inspection items.

-Results: Two apparent violations were identified - Inadequate Fire Brigade

Drills and Training - paragraph 5.b. and Failure to Implement Fire Protection

Procedures FPP-013 - paragraph 6.a.

8604020392 860324

PDR ADOCM 05000324

G PDR

_s

a

i

'

.

REPORT DETAILS

1. ' Persons Contacted

Licensee Employees

  • E. A. Bishop, Manager Operations
  • J. W. Chase, Assistant to General Manager
  • C. R. Dietz, Plant General Manager
  • C. E. Enzor, Director Regulatory Compliance
  • R. J. Groover, Manager, Brunswick Construction Unit
  • J. R. Holder, Outage Manager
  • B. L. Parks, Engineering Supervisor
  • R. E. Porterfield, Senior Engineer - Fire Protection
  • R. M. Poulk, Jr., Senior Specialist - Regulatory Compliance

A. Spencer, Training Specialist

  • J. D. Wilcox, Principal Engineer-0perations
  • T. H. Wyllie, Manager, Engineering and Construction

Other licensee employees contacted included construction craf tsinen,

engineers, technicians, operators, mechanics, security force members, and

office personnel.

Other Organizations

R. E. Deacy, Fire Protection Engineer, Impell Corporation

NRC Resident Inspectors

'*W. H. Ruland

  • L. Garner
  • Attended exit interview

2. Exit Interview

The inspection scope and findings were summarized on January 24, 1986, with

those persons indicated in paragraph 1 above. The inspector described the

areas inspected and discussed in detail the inspection findings. No

dissenting comments were received from the licensee.

a. ViolationItem(324/86-04-01and325/86-03-01), Inadequate Fire Brigade

Drills and Training - parag' .2ph 5.b.

b. Violation Item (324/86-04-02 and 325/86-03-01), Failure to Implement

Fire Protection Procedures FPP-013,' paragraph 6.

The licensee did not identify-as proprietary any of the materials provided

to or reviewed by the inspector during this inspection.

1

. - - - - _ - - - - . . . - . - . - - _ _ _ , . . _ _ . _ . .

-

.

2

3. Licensee' Action on Previous Enforcement Matters

(Closed) Unresolved Item -(324/84-37-02 and 325/84-37-02), Surveillance

Requirements of the Fire / Flame Impingement Barrier for Fire Pumps. Section

7.8 of Surveillance Procedure PT-34.6.7.2, Revision 1, has been revised to

include an' inspection of the fire / flame impingement barrier for the fire

pumps on a 18-month frequency.

4. Unresolved Items

Unresolved items were not identified during the inspection.

5. Fire Protection Prevention Program (64703)

a. Fire Prevention / Administrative Controls Procedures

The inspector ' reviewed the following Fire Prevention / Administrative

Proced res:

Procedure No. Title

FPP-003 Fire Brigade Training

FPP-004 Fire Brigade Personnel Medical

-and Physical Qualifications

FPP-007 Control and Use of Fire

Fighting Equipment

FPP-013 Weekly Fire Inspection and

Plant Housekeeping

FPP-014 Control of . Combustibles - and

Transient Loads

FPP-017 Control of Cutting, Welding and

Grinding

PFP-001 Pre-Fire Control Procedure

PFP-013 General Fire Plan

Based on this review, it appears that the above procedures meet the NRC

Guidelines of:

(1) The docurnent entitled " Nuclear Plant Fire Protection functional

Responsibilities, Administrative Controls, and Quality Assurance"

dated June 1977.

(2) 10 CFR 50 Appendix R - Fire Protection Programs for Nuclear Power

Facilities.

,

-

.

3

b. Fire Brigade

(1) Organizations-

The plant fire brigade is composed of six shifts of fully dedi-

cated fire brigade personnel. The fire brigade leader is normally

a Senior Reactor Operator and the remaining fire brigade members

are composed of Auxiliary Operators and a radwaste representative.

The inspector reviewed the on-shift " fire brigade roster" for the

dates January 8,1986 through January 22, 1986, and verified that a

sufficient number of fire brigade personnel were on duty to meet

the provisions of Technical Specification 6.2.2 for fire brigade

operations and for plant operation.

(2) Training

The inspector reviewed the training records for six brigade Fire

Chiefs and 13 fire brigade members assigned duty during the above

period and found that four of the fire brigade members had not

completed all quarterly fire brigade training and one brigade.

member had not participated in the number of fire drills required

by procedure FPP-003. This is identified as Violation Item

(324/86-04-01 and 325/86-03-01), Inadequate Fire Brigade Drills

and Training. A sample of the records of the annual physical

examinations and respirator training for the brigade members

required by procedure FPP-004 were reviewed and found satisfac-

tory.

(3) Fire Brigade Equipment

The inspector performed an inspection of the fire brigade equip-

ment, consisting of fire hose, nozzles, tools, and miscellaneous

equipment, stored at the fire brigade equipment response location

located at the south fire equipment house.

A total of 17 sets of turnout gear (coats, boots, helmets etc.),

17 sets of self contained breathing apparatus, and 38 spare air

cylinders are available. Ten sets are located adjacent .to the

main centrol room; two sets are in the radwaste control room; and

five_ sets are at the south fire equipment house.

Based on this inspection, the designated fire brigade equipment

stored at the fire brigade equipment response locations appeared

to be properly maintained and stored in a ready condition.

Except as noted above, no additional violations or deviations were identi-

fied within the areas inspected.

I

_

-

.

4

6 .' Fire Protection / Prevention Program Implementation (64704)

Plant Tours

Plant tours were made by the inspector on both day and night shifts. At the

time of the inspections Unit I was in full operation.and Unit 2 was in an

extended outage. During the plant tours portions of the following plant

areas.and .their related fire protection features were inspected:

Diesel Generator Building - 2', 23', and 50' elevations

Service Water Building - 4', 20' elevations

Reactor Building Unit 2 - (-)17', 20' and 50' elevations

Reactor Building Unit 1 - 20' - 50' Elevations and Refueling Floor Control

Building - 23' and 49' elevations

The inspector visually inspected the fire / smoke detection capabilities, and

the manual firefighting equipment (i.e., portable extinguishers, hose

stations, etc.) and the fire barrier walls associated with the above plant

areas.

Based on the visual inspection, it appears that the fire protection features

associated with the above plant areas were properly maintained and fully

functional, except that a number of fire doors in the diesel generator

building were not in service. However, the licensee had established the LCO

requirements of the Technical Specifications for these areas.

The plant tours also reviewed the licensee's implementation of the fire

protection administrative procedures. On January 22, 1986, the inspector

and the Brunswick plant Fire Protection Engineer accompanied members of the

-

Fire Protection Support group during their conduction of a weekly fire

inspection per the criteria of procedures FPP-013 and .FPP-014 of the Service

Water Building and Diesel Generator Building. During this walkthrough the

inspector observed a non fire-retardant wood crate, combustible cardboard

and rubber gasketing material associated with Unit 2 maintenance work which

had obstructed fire protection equipment in the Unit 1 area of the Service

Water Building. Also identified was flammable oil accumulations on the

floor, conduits and cable trays within the 2' elevation of the diesel

generator building. These conditions were reported to the licensee. The

licensee's fire protection support group inspector during this walkthrough

did not identify or note any of these conditions on the FPP-013 checklist.

FPP-013 requires the inspectors to note any identified condition which could

adversely affect the fire protection status of the area. Failure to

identify, and not correct the above mentioned conditions which are adverse

to the fire protection of the area is considered a faihre to implement

FPP-013. This constitutes a violation of Technical Specification 6.8.1.f,

which requires that written procedures for the fire protection program be

implemented and is identified as Violation Item (324/86-04-02 and

325/86-03-02), Failure to Implement Fire Protection Procedure FPP-013.

-

-

-

5

Several _ welding operations were observed in the Unit-2 reactor building

during outage maintenance activities. An approved " Hot Work" permit had

been issued for the welding sites and the operations and fire prevention /

protection practices generally met the licensee's fire prevention procedure

requirements.

The general housekeeping as a whole had deteriorated somewhat since the last

NRC fire protection . inspection. This can be contributed to the Unit 2

outage activities and the licensee's failure to identify and correct adverse

housekeeping practices as identified _ by above Violation Item 324/86-04-02

and 325/86-03-02.

Except as noted above, no additional violations or deviations were identi-

fied within the areas inspected.

7. Inspector Followup Items

(Closed) Inspector Followup Item, (324/84-37-01 and 325/84-37-01), Surveil-

lance Testing for Eight Hour Battery Powered Emergency Lighting Units.

Procedure PT-34.15.9.1 Revision 0, was issued on November 13, 1985, to

provide semiannual physical inspection and lighting head positioning for all

Appendix R Emergency Lighting . Units. In addition, this procedure provides

for an 18-month battery capacity 8-hour discharge test for a 10% sample of

the emergency lighting units. The scope of testing and schedule provided in

the procedure appear acceptable.

1

!

i

,

_