IR 015000009/1996015: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Adams
{{Adams
| number = ML20135C738
| number = ML20149M598
| issue date = 11/26/1996
| issue date = 12/10/1996
| title = Insp Rept 15000009/96-15 on 961105.Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Radiation Program for Moisture Density Testing Activities
| title = Discusses Insp Rept 15000009/96-15 on 961105 & Violation Re Failure to Obtain General or Specific NRC License as Required by 10CFR30.3.No NRC Enforcement Action Will Be Taken
| author name =  
| author name = Ebneter S
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
| addressee name =  
| addressee name = Pettis A
| addressee affiliation =  
| addressee affiliation = AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
| docket = 15000009
| docket = 15000009
| license number =  
| license number =  
| contact person =  
| contact person =  
| document report number = 15000009-96-15, NUDOCS 9612090063
| document report number = EA-96-473, NUDOCS 9612170455
| package number = ML20135C716
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
| document type = INSPECTION REPORT, NRC-GENERATED, TEXT-INSPECTION & AUDIT & I&E CIRCULARS
| page count = 3
| page count = 5
}}
}}


Line 19: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:,
{{#Wiki_filter:_ _ _ _ _ .. _ _ _ _ _ .- _ . _ .. . _ _ _ _ ____ ___ _
i
        !
..
        [
'
i
        !
        !
        !
December 10. 1996  !
EA 96-473 Tri-State Testing      l ATTN: Mr. Art Pettis      r President      l P. O. Box 477      i Cottondale. Florida 32431-0477      l SUBJECT: EXERCISE OF ENFORCEMENT DISCRETION (NRC INSPECTION REPORT NO. 150-00009/96-15)    !
i


U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
==Dear Mr. Pettis:==
 
l This refers to the s)ecial, unannounced inspection conducted by this office-on  :
==REGION II==
November 5. 1996. T1e results of this inspection were provided to you in our   !
Docket No.: 150 00009 Report No.: 150 00009/96 15 Organization: Tri-State Testing Location: Cottondale, Florida Date: November 5, 1996 Inspector: Wade T. Loo, Health Physicist Approved by: Charles M. Hosey Chief Materials Licensing / Inspection Branch 1 Division of Nuclear Materials Safety Enclosure 9612090063 961126 PDR STPRG ESOFL PDR
letter dated November 26. 1996. At that time you were informed that the  ;
 
inspection had identified one apparent violation, the failure to obtain a   l general or specific NRC license, as required by 10 CFR 30.3. prior to using  i portable nuclear gauges containing byproduct material. Specifically, on numerous occasions during the period 1991 through the date of the onsite  ,
_ _
inspection, you used portable nuclear gauges at Eglin Air Force Base (EAFB),   -
   . _ . .  - . _ . . ._  . -
Florida, in areas where the NRC maintains jurisdiction for regulating the use  ;
      !
of byproduct material without an NRC license. You were informed at that time  l that the apparent violation was under consideration for enforcement.  ;
'
:
.
Although the requirements of 10 CFR 30.3 apply to work performed in areas of  l exclusive Federal jurisdiction in Agreement States, we note that as an  !
;   EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Tri-State Testing NRC Inspection Report 150 00009/96 15
alternative to obtaining an NRC license as permitted by NRC practice. Tri-  l l
,
'
This special, unannounced inspection was conducted to evaluate Tri-State Testing's (TST's) radiation safety program for moisture density testing activities conducted in areas of exclusive Federal jurisdiction. Through discussions with cognizant TST representatives, reviews of documents, and 4 direct observations of licensee equipment and instrumentation, the inspector
!
found that TST did not have a specific NRC license nor did the company file for reciprocity in accordance with 10 CFR 150.20. The company, thus, did not i
have an NRC license to use byproduct material in areas of exclusive Federal jurisdiction. Program areas included in this report are management oversight
; and organization and scope of the progra Manaaement Oversicht
>
e The inspector identified an ap)arent violation regarding TST's failure to file for reciprocity with t1e NRC prior to using radioactive materials for conducting moisture density testing at Eglin Air Force Base, Florida, an area of exclusive Federal jurisdictio j
; .Oraanization and Scope of the Licensee Proaram
'
'
. TST had a State of Florida license to possess and use radioactive i
State Testing could have filed an NRC Form-241. paid the associated fees, and   !
;
conducted these activities as described in 10 CFR 150.20.    !
materials contained in oortable moisture density gauges to measure i  properties of construction materials or soils. The use of byproduct -
i The inspection established that, at the time you performed the work in   l question, you did not appear to be aware of the need to either obtain a  :
,  materials was conducted at temporary job sites throughout the State of
s)ecific license under 10 CFR 30.3 or in lieu thereof, to file a Form-241 with  !
 
tie NRC. The inspection also determined that you assumed that because you  ;
Florida including areas of exclusive Federal jurisdictio :
hold a State of Florida license, you could conduct moisture density activities  '
$
L anywhere in the State of Florida including on military installations or in areas of exclusive Federal jurisdiction within the State. You did state.   ;
J j
; however, that you had recently received information from the State of Florida  ;
.
; regarding the requirements for filing for reciprocity with the NRC. and since  .
l
that time. Tri-State Testing has not performed activities at any military  !
 
installations.       '
.. .- - - _ . - . __ .
        ;
*
o
,
,
REPORT DETAILS 01. Manaaement Oversiaht (87100)
Normally, the failure to obtain an NRC license or the failure to file an   l l NRC Form-241 to notify the NRC of activities being conducted within its  i j jurisdiction would be considered for escalated enforcement action which could  I i '
10 CFR 30.3 requires, in relevant part, that no person shall possess or use byproduct material except as authorized by a specific or general license issued by the NR CFR 150.20(a) provides, in part, that any person who holds a specific license from an Agreement State is grante an NRC general license to conduct the same activity in non Agreement States subject to the provisions of 10 CFR 150.20(b).
include the. issuance of a civil penalty in accordance with the " General  i Statement of Policy and Procedures for NRC Enforcement Actions" (Enforcement  t
-
Policy). NUREG-1600. However, after consultation with the Director. Office of -
!
Enforcement,theNRCisexercisingenforcementdiscretionandisnottgking  ;
    "
961217o455 96121o    r I [b
        '
PDR STPRG ESOF ST,        pj
  .  .


10 CFR 150.20(b)(1) requires, in part, that any person engagir.g in activities in non-Agreement States shall, at least 3 days before engaging in each such activity, file 4 copies of NRC Form 241, " Report of Proposed Activities in Non Agreement States " with the Regional Administrator of the appropriate NRC regional offic On August 5, 1996, the inspector reviewed the conduct of activities involving the use of byproduct material at Eglin Air Force Base (EAFB),
Florida with cognizant Air Force representatives. From discussions with Air Force representatives for activities that involved moisture density testing, the inspector determined that Tri-State Testing (TST) had conducted moisture density testing at EAFB in past years. However, Air Force representatives were not able to confirm the exact dates TST utilized the portable moisture density gauges (PMDGs). Also, the inspector was unable to verify TST's use of PMDGs due to the volume of i documents available for review. For those records sampled, the inspector was not able to determine if TST had conducted activities using PMDG On November 5, 1996, the inspector conducted an onsite ins >ection of TST ,
to determine if TST had conducted activities requiring an iRC license at l EAFB, Florida. The inspector discussed those activities with TST l representatives and reviewed those TST records available at the time of j the onsite inspection. From those discussions and reviews, the  '
inspector independently verified that TST had used a PMDG for moisture density testing purposes at EAFB, Florida. TST representatives stated that the PMDG had been used over the last five years at EAFB, Florid During that five year period TFT used the PMDG for a >eriod of one and a half years, averaging two times a month. However, t1e inspector was not able to determine the exact dates of use for those and other activities in past years. Activities conducted under TST's State of Florida radioactive materials license did not require them to maintain a utilization log. During discussions with the ins)ector, TST representatives could not recall the exact dates aut only an estimate of when the PMDGs had been used at EAFB. TST representatives stated that they were under the assumption that they had a State of Florida radioactive materials license which allowed them to conduct moisture density activities at temporary job sites in the State of Florida including EAFB. TST representatives stated that they did recall l
_ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ __ _ _ _ .. _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ._ _ _ _ _ - _ _
i
i
: - '
.
l
l
      !
  .
  .
' reveiving within the last month information from the State of Florida i
,
l Tri-State Testing  I l


regarding the requirement for filing for reciprocity with the NR l However, prior to receipt of the State of Florida information. TST  !
any enforcement action in this matter, in accordance with Section VII.B.6 of i the Enforcement Policy. The NRC is exercising enforcement discretion ba:ed on i the circumstances described above and in the subject inspection re) ort.
;
representatives were not aware of the requirement for filing for reciprocity with the NRC. TST representatives informed the innector  !
that since receipt of the State of Florida information. TST had not 3


conducted activities at EAFB or other military installations. Although i the ins tor could not independently verify the exact dates of use of i'
including our conclusions that you did not intentionally fail to o)tain the proper license and that Tri-State Testing did not understand the regulatory recuirements pertaining to the use of licensed materials in areas of exclusive Feceral jurisdiction within an Agreement State until the recent notification ,
*
from the State of Florida. In reaching this decision, the NRC also considered the efforts taken by Tri-State Testing personnel to become familiar with applicable NRC requirements, your honesty in admitting that such work was ;
TST's P s at EAFB, the inspector concluded, based on discussions with TST representatives, that TST had not filed for reciprocity to conduct i licensed activities at EAFB, Florida, areas of exclusive Federal  '
performed, and the fact that Tri-State Testing was not made aware by EAFB -
jurisdictio Failure of the licensee to file for reciprocity for l
contracting personnel of the existence of areas of exclusive Federal jurisdiction on the base.
. licensed activities conducted in areas of exclusive Federal jurisdiction !
was identified as an apparent _ violation of 10 CFR 3 :
'
0 Oraanization and Scooe of the Licensee Proaram (87100)  ,
!    Through discussions with cognizant licensee representatives, the
!    inspector determined that TST was licensed by the State of Florida to ,
possess and use radioactive materials contained in PMDGs for measuring '
t properties of construction materials or soils. Through those
'
    . discussions and from a review of records, the inspector determined that '
TST possessed and used four PMDGs that contained millicurie quantities i    of cesium 137 and americium 241. Also, the inspector determined that ;
three individuals were trained to use the PMDGs. TST representatives  ;
stated that company activities primarily involved soil testing. TST  !
i
'
used the PMDGs at temporary job sites located throughout the State of Florida including areas of exclusive Federal jurisdiction.


<
Although the NRC is exercising enforcement discretion based on the circumstances identified during the inspection, you are advised that future failures to seek appropriate authorization to perform activities in areas where the NRC maintains jurisdiction may result in significant enforcement action. We would expect that, in the future. Tri-State Testing would obtain written assessments from. or document assessments by. Federal authorities as to whether a pro)osed work site is in an area of exclusive Federal jurisdiction. A3sent such documentation showing that Federal authorities assessed the work site as not being in an area of exclusive Federal jurisdiction, significant enforcement action may be taken for failure to seek .
j      EXIT MEETING SUMMARY l  An exit meeting was held with TST representatives on November 5, 1996. The i  overall findings from the inspection, including the apparent violation, were i  discussed. No dissenting commerts were received from TST, and TST did not
the required authorization to perform licensed activities in areas of ;
<
exclusive Federal jurisdiction.
specify any information reviewed during the inspection as proprietary in nature.


>
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice." a copy of this letter and any reply you may choose to provide will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room. l Should you have any questions regarding this inspection, please contact Mr. Charles Hosey at (404) 331-5614.
;
LIST OF PERSONS CONTACTED Licensee Art Pettis, President
:
Cindy Pettis, Secretary i
INSPECTION PROCEDURE USED


;   IP 87100: Licensed Materials Program i
Sincerely
;
Original Signed by Stewart D. Ebneter
      '
Stewart D. Ebneter Regional Administrator Docket No.- 150-00009 Florida License No. 1988-1    ;
cc: State of Florida l
i


j
_ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ . _ . . _ _ _ ._
_ _. _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . . . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _
i i ,-
I(  ,
          .,. .[;
$
$
;         ,
,Trf-StateTesting i            i i l' ".ribut'
1  o i:        i 4 '          '
' We tan BKoeling, bECY CA
; JTaylor,,ED0 i HTh son DEDS i set ou$er,RI!
ne          :
            '
'
: CP eriello, NMSS          '
I DC 1, NMS$          '
i i
LC ndler, 0GC JGoldberg,OGC
', Enf>rcement Coordinators
! R I, RI!!. RIV i EHafden, OPA s H8e!), O!G i GCa uto, 0!
i
: EJo dan AE00 l JLi berm,an, OE          {
1 DE:          ,-
j NMarpish, File OE (BSummers)(2 Letterhead) (Also be E-Mail)      i j CEV ns, RI!          i
 
bur c          t i CHo e, RII Rll l WLo ,y, RII          ,
, KC1 rk, RI!
RTr anowski, RI!
            '
i i A8ol nd, RI!          '
i i
t
: PUBLl1C          , !
l NUD0'CS          !
a            l i ,
            '
l
l
-
            ,
        !
 
1 l            l
            '


._ . . . _ . . . - . _ . . - _ - _ . _ _ . . _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . . . _ _ _ . _
'.
          !
l i            !
          .
;
I
I i
! '
f I
l
!           i 4  .          I
; .          ,
  '
;            !
j OE M RA:RII # 0:0E N
,
,
  ,
l#4 amish SEbneter JLiebe$a'n l 12/ 3 /96  12/ 3 /96 12/ 3 /96
          ,
'.
i          1
sw sc
          ;
    --
!      3 i
ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED    1 t
OPENED
          !
l 96 001 VIO FAILURE TO OBTAIN A LICENSE TO POSSESS AND USE RADI0 ACTIVE MATERIAL
          !
          ;
l
l
          !
!
l          i l         ;
Doc Name: G:\0ECASES\96473REV.NN         t l           !
t
            '
 
            .
i
j            !
!          l l
  '
!
i           l
l l
!            !
l          ,
l           !
!         )
'
l          l l          ,
q  ,  . --    ' .
!          i l
            ; i . . .,
t i
        !  '
,
_ _
(
    , .,
!
       , ,,.
t i
        $ ;'s, ***END***
I l
      ....4.--
e d
_
'l N
l l-. . . _ -  -
       ,,_ , _ . . _ _ _ - - _ _ - . .
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 04:19, 26 October 2020

Discusses Insp Rept 15000009/96-15 on 961105 & Violation Re Failure to Obtain General or Specific NRC License as Required by 10CFR30.3.No NRC Enforcement Action Will Be Taken
ML20149M598
Person / Time
Site: 15000009, 015000009
Issue date: 12/10/1996
From: Ebneter S
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To: Pettis A
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
References
EA-96-473, NUDOCS 9612170455
Download: ML20149M598 (3)


Text

_ _ _ _ _ .. _ _ _ _ _ .- _ . _ .. . _ _ _ _ ____ ___ _

i

!

..

[

'

i

!

!

!

December 10. 1996  !

EA 96-473 Tri-State Testing l ATTN: Mr. Art Pettis r President l P. O. Box 477 i Cottondale. Florida 32431-0477 l SUBJECT: EXERCISE OF ENFORCEMENT DISCRETION (NRC INSPECTION REPORT NO. 150-00009/96-15)  !

i

Dear Mr. Pettis:

l This refers to the s)ecial, unannounced inspection conducted by this office-on  :

November 5. 1996. T1e results of this inspection were provided to you in our  !

letter dated November 26. 1996. At that time you were informed that the  ;

inspection had identified one apparent violation, the failure to obtain a l general or specific NRC license, as required by 10 CFR 30.3. prior to using i portable nuclear gauges containing byproduct material. Specifically, on numerous occasions during the period 1991 through the date of the onsite ,

inspection, you used portable nuclear gauges at Eglin Air Force Base (EAFB), -

Florida, in areas where the NRC maintains jurisdiction for regulating the use  ;

of byproduct material without an NRC license. You were informed at that time l that the apparent violation was under consideration for enforcement.  ;

Although the requirements of 10 CFR 30.3 apply to work performed in areas of l exclusive Federal jurisdiction in Agreement States, we note that as an  !

alternative to obtaining an NRC license as permitted by NRC practice. Tri- l l

'

State Testing could have filed an NRC Form-241. paid the associated fees, and  !

conducted these activities as described in 10 CFR 150.20.  !

i The inspection established that, at the time you performed the work in l question, you did not appear to be aware of the need to either obtain a  :

s)ecific license under 10 CFR 30.3 or in lieu thereof, to file a Form-241 with  !

tie NRC. The inspection also determined that you assumed that because you  ;

hold a State of Florida license, you could conduct moisture density activities '

L anywhere in the State of Florida including on military installations or in areas of exclusive Federal jurisdiction within the State. You did state.  ;

however, that you had recently received information from the State of Florida  ;
regarding the requirements for filing for reciprocity with the NRC. and since .

that time. Tri-State Testing has not performed activities at any military  !

installations. '

o

,

Normally, the failure to obtain an NRC license or the failure to file an l l NRC Form-241 to notify the NRC of activities being conducted within its i j jurisdiction would be considered for escalated enforcement action which could I i '

include the. issuance of a civil penalty in accordance with the " General i Statement of Policy and Procedures for NRC Enforcement Actions" (Enforcement t

-

Policy). NUREG-1600. However, after consultation with the Director. Office of -

!

Enforcement,theNRCisexercisingenforcementdiscretionandisnottgking  ;

"

961217o455 96121o r I [b

'

PDR STPRG ESOF ST, pj

. .

i

.

l

!

.

,

l Tri-State Testing 2 I l

any enforcement action in this matter, in accordance with Section VII.B.6 of i the Enforcement Policy. The NRC is exercising enforcement discretion ba:ed on i the circumstances described above and in the subject inspection re) ort.

including our conclusions that you did not intentionally fail to o)tain the proper license and that Tri-State Testing did not understand the regulatory recuirements pertaining to the use of licensed materials in areas of exclusive Feceral jurisdiction within an Agreement State until the recent notification ,

from the State of Florida. In reaching this decision, the NRC also considered the efforts taken by Tri-State Testing personnel to become familiar with applicable NRC requirements, your honesty in admitting that such work was ;

performed, and the fact that Tri-State Testing was not made aware by EAFB -

contracting personnel of the existence of areas of exclusive Federal jurisdiction on the base.

Although the NRC is exercising enforcement discretion based on the circumstances identified during the inspection, you are advised that future failures to seek appropriate authorization to perform activities in areas where the NRC maintains jurisdiction may result in significant enforcement action. We would expect that, in the future. Tri-State Testing would obtain written assessments from. or document assessments by. Federal authorities as to whether a pro)osed work site is in an area of exclusive Federal jurisdiction. A3sent such documentation showing that Federal authorities assessed the work site as not being in an area of exclusive Federal jurisdiction, significant enforcement action may be taken for failure to seek .

the required authorization to perform licensed activities in areas of ;

exclusive Federal jurisdiction.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice." a copy of this letter and any reply you may choose to provide will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room. l Should you have any questions regarding this inspection, please contact Mr. Charles Hosey at (404) 331-5614.

Sincerely

.  ;

Original Signed by Stewart D. Ebneter

'

Stewart D. Ebneter Regional Administrator Docket No.- 150-00009 Florida License No. 1988-1  ;

cc: State of Florida l

i

_ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ . _ . . _ _ _ ._

_ _. _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . . . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _

i i ,-

I( ,

.,. .[;

$

,Trf-StateTesting i i i l' ".ribut'

1 o i: i 4 ' '

' We tan BKoeling, bECY CA

JTaylor,,ED0 i HTh son DEDS i set ou$er,RI!

ne  :

'

'

CP eriello, NMSS '

I DC 1, NMS$ '

i i

LC ndler, 0GC JGoldberg,OGC

', Enf>rcement Coordinators

! R I, RI!!. RIV i EHafden, OPA s H8e!), O!G i GCa uto, 0!

i

EJo dan AE00 l JLi berm,an, OE {

1 DE: ,-

j NMarpish, File OE (BSummers)(2 Letterhead) (Also be E-Mail) i j CEV ns, RI! i

bur c t i CHo e, RII Rll l WLo ,y, RII ,

, KC1 rk, RI!

RTr anowski, RI!

'

i i A8ol nd, RI! '

i i

t

PUBLl1C , !

l NUD0'CS  !

a l i ,

'

l

,

1 l l

'

'.

l i  !

I i

f I

! i 4 . I

'

!

j OE M RA:RII # 0:0E N

,

l#4 amish SEbneter JLiebe$a'n l 12/ 3 /96 12/ 3 /96 12/ 3 /96

'.

sw sc

--

l

!

Doc Name: G:\0ECASES\96473REV.NN t l  !

'

.

j  !

'

i l

!  !

l  !

'

q , . -- ' .

i . . .,

! '

_ _

, .,

, ,,.

$  ;'s, ***END***

....4.~ --

_