ML15027A206: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:USCA Case #14-1225 Document #1534266 Filed: 01/27/2015 Page 1 of 1 United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT | {{#Wiki_filter:USCA Case #14-1225 Document #1534266 Filed: 01/27/2015 Page 1 of 1 United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT No. 14-1225 September Term, 2014 NRC-50-352-LR NRC-79FR63650 Filed On: January 27, 2015 [1534266] | ||
No. 14-1225 September Term, 2014 NRC-50-352-LR NRC-79FR63650 Filed On: January 27, 2015 [1534266] | |||
Natural Resources Defense Council, Petitioner v. | Natural Resources Defense Council, Petitioner v. | ||
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and United States of America, Respondents | U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and United States of America, Respondents Exelon Generation Company, LLC, Intervenor ORDER Upon consideration of the motion for leave to intervene filed by: | ||
Exelon Generation Company, LLC, Intervenor ORDER Upon consideration of the motion for leave to intervene filed by: | |||
Exelon Generation Company, LLC, it is ORDERED that the motion be granted. | Exelon Generation Company, LLC, it is ORDERED that the motion be granted. | ||
Circuit Rules 28(d) and 32(a)(2) govern the filing of briefs by intervenors. A schedule for the filing of briefs will be established by future order. That order will automatically provide briefing only for intervenors on the side of respondents. Any intervenor(s) intending to participate in support of petitioner must so notify the court, in writing, within 14 days of the date of this order. | Circuit Rules 28(d) and 32(a)(2) govern the filing of briefs by intervenors. A schedule for the filing of briefs will be established by future order. That order will automatically provide briefing only for intervenors on the side of respondents. Any intervenor(s) intending to participate in support of petitioner must so notify the court, in writing, within 14 days of the date of this order. | ||
Latest revision as of 16:01, 5 February 2020
| ML15027A206 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Limerick  |
| Issue date: | 01/27/2015 |
| From: | Langer M, Yacisin A US Federal Judiciary, US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit |
| To: | NRC/OGC |
| Creedon. meghan | |
| References | |
| 14-1225, 1534266, NRC-50-352-LR, NRC-79FR63650 | |
| Download: ML15027A206 (1) | |
Text
USCA Case #14-1225 Document #1534266 Filed: 01/27/2015 Page 1 of 1 United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT No. 14-1225 September Term, 2014 NRC-50-352-LR NRC-79FR63650 Filed On: January 27, 2015 [1534266]
Natural Resources Defense Council, Petitioner v.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and United States of America, Respondents Exelon Generation Company, LLC, Intervenor ORDER Upon consideration of the motion for leave to intervene filed by:
Exelon Generation Company, LLC, it is ORDERED that the motion be granted.
Circuit Rules 28(d) and 32(a)(2) govern the filing of briefs by intervenors. A schedule for the filing of briefs will be established by future order. That order will automatically provide briefing only for intervenors on the side of respondents. Any intervenor(s) intending to participate in support of petitioner must so notify the court, in writing, within 14 days of the date of this order.
Such notification must include a statement of the issues to be raised by the intervenor(s). This notification will allow tailoring of the briefing schedule to provide time for a brief as intervenor on the side of petitioner. Failure to submit notification could result in an intervenor being denied leave to file a brief.
Intervenors supporting the same party are reminded that they must file a joint brief or certify to the court why a separate brief is necessary. Intervenors' attention is particularly directed to D.C. Circuit Handbook of Practice and Internal Procedures 38-39 (2013), which describes "unacceptable" grounds for filing separate briefs. Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions. See D.C. Cir. Rule 38.
FOR THE COURT:
Mark J. Langer, Clerk BY: /s/
Amy Yacisin Deputy Clerk