ML19317F186: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) Created page by program invented by StriderTol |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) Created page by program invented by StriderTol |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:. | {{#Wiki_filter:. | ||
e 4 | |||
g September 26, 1972 | g September 26, 1972 | ||
(~/ Seneca, South Carolina U.S. Atomic Energy Commission Washington, D.C. 20545 Attention: Deputy Director For Reactor Projects Director of Licensing Gentlemen The Benefit-Cost Comparison for the Oconee Nuclear Power Station in the Draft Detailed Statement on the En Man-rems / year /3 units Gaseous Discharge | (~/ Seneca, South Carolina U.S. Atomic Energy Commission Washington, D.C. 20545 Attention: Deputy Director For Reactor Projects Director of Licensing Gentlemen The Benefit-Cost Comparison for the Oconee Nuclear Power Station in the Draft Detailed Statement on the En Man-rems / year /3 units Gaseous Discharge 14 " " " "" | ||
14 " " " "" | |||
Liould 100 " " " "" | Liould 100 " " " "" | ||
Sofid Waste " 5 The Final Environmental Statement listed in the ing effect: | Sofid Waste " 5 The Final Environmental Statement listed in the ing effect: | ||
Gaseous Discharge 4 Man-rems / year | Gaseous Discharge 4 Man-rems / year | ||
" 6 Liquid The reduction in radiological discharge is impressive and Unfortu-I am obviously curious how this was accomplished, nately I could not find a reference regarding this fact inWould you b the Final Environmental Statement, inform me where the refer I would appreciate your assistance. | |||
" 6 Liquid The reduction in radiological discharge is impressive and Unfortu-I am obviously curious how this was accomplished, nately I could not find a reference regarding this fact inWould you b the Final Environmental Statement, inform me where the refer | |||
I would appreciate your assistance. | |||
Very truly yours, u da f ; sf & ' | Very truly yours, u da f ; sf & ' | ||
' Herbert Knohl Rt. 1 Box 282 Seneca, South Carolina 29678 | ' Herbert Knohl Rt. 1 Box 282 Seneca, South Carolina 29678 8 | ||
82080 jP2pcs i.< - >c;- sa- ai r3}} | |||
Revision as of 07:03, 1 February 2020
| ML19317F186 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee  |
| Issue date: | 11/07/1972 |
| From: | Knohl H AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| To: | US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19317F181 | List: |
| References | |
| 720926, NUDOCS 8001080900 | |
| Download: ML19317F186 (1) | |
Text
.
e 4
g September 26, 1972
(~/ Seneca, South Carolina U.S. Atomic Energy Commission Washington, D.C. 20545 Attention: Deputy Director For Reactor Projects Director of Licensing Gentlemen The Benefit-Cost Comparison for the Oconee Nuclear Power Station in the Draft Detailed Statement on the En Man-rems / year /3 units Gaseous Discharge 14 " " " ""
Liould 100 " " " ""
Sofid Waste " 5 The Final Environmental Statement listed in the ing effect:
Gaseous Discharge 4 Man-rems / year
" 6 Liquid The reduction in radiological discharge is impressive and Unfortu-I am obviously curious how this was accomplished, nately I could not find a reference regarding this fact inWould you b the Final Environmental Statement, inform me where the refer I would appreciate your assistance.
Very truly yours, u da f ; sf & '
' Herbert Knohl Rt. 1 Box 282 Seneca, South Carolina 29678 8
82080 jP2pcs i.< - >c;- sa- ai r3