ML19317F186

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Requests Info Re Difference Between Radiological Discharge in Des & Fes
ML19317F186
Person / Time
Site: Oconee 
Issue date: 11/07/1972
From: Knohl H
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
Shared Package
ML19317F181 List:
References
720926, NUDOCS 8001080900
Download: ML19317F186 (1)


Text

.

e 4

g September 26, 1972 Seneca, South Carolina

(~/

U.S. Atomic Energy Commission Washington, D.C.

20545 Deputy Director For Reactor Projects Attention: Director of Licensing Gentlemen The Benefit-Cost Comparison for the Oconee Nuclear Power Station in the Draft Detailed Statement on the E Gaseous Discharge 14 Man-rems / year /3 units 100 Liould Sofid Waste "

5 The Final Environmental Statement listed in the ing effect:

Gaseous Discharge 4 Man-rems / year 6

Liquid The reduction in radiological discharge is impressive and Unfortu-I am obviously curious how this was accomplished, nately I could not find a reference regarding this fact inWould you b the Final Environmental Statement, inform me where the refe I would appreciate your assistance.

Very truly yours, u da f ; sf & '

' Herbert Knohl Rt. 1 Box 282 Seneca, South Carolina 29678 8 82080 jP2pcs i.< - >c;- sa-ai r3