NRC Generic Letter 1982-17: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 14: Line 14:
| page count = 3
| page count = 3
}}
}}
{{#Wiki_filter:I OCT 01 198 TO ALL LICENSEES  
{{#Wiki_filter:I
ANM APPLICANiTS  
                                                                                                                              OCT 01 198 TO ALL LICENSEES ANM APPLICANiTS FOR OPERATINiG P(AlER REACTORS
FOR OPERATINiG  
            AiO 1OOLJERS OF CONSTRUCTION PERHITS FOR POWER REACTORS
P(AlER REACTORS AiO 1OOLJERS OF CONSTRUCTION  
            Gentlenen:
PERHITS FOR POWER REACTORS Gentlenen:
            SUBJECT:       INCOWI'SISTENCY BETWEEN REQUIREft.NTS OF 10 CFR 50.54(t)
SUBJECT: INCOWI'SISTENCY  
                            AND) STAiIDARU TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION4S FOR PERFORIMING
BETWEEN REQUIREft.NTS  
                            AUDITS OF EIERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PisOGRA.1S
OF 10 CFR 50.54(t)AND) STAiIDARU  
                            (Generic Letter No. 82-17)
TECHNICAL  
            Section 50.54(t) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations requires that each nuclear power reactor licensee provide for an independent review of its einergency preparedness program at least every 12 months.
SPECIFICATION4S  
 
FOR PERFORIMING
It has comie to our attention that the Standard Technical Specifications in use by a number of licensees and some existing plant-specific Technical Specifications require that this independent audit be carried out every 24 months.
AUDITS OF EIERGENCY  
 
PREPAREDNESS  
All licensees are required to neet the requiremnents of 10 CFR 50.54(t),
PisOGRA.1S (Generic Letter No. 82-17)Section 50.54(t) of Title 10 of the Code that each nuclear power reactor licensee of its einergency preparedness program at of Federal Regulations requires provide for an independent review least every 12 months.It has comie to our attention that the Standard Technical Specifications in use by a number of licensees and some existing plant-specific Technical Specifications require that this independent audit be carried out every 24 months.All licensees are required to neet the requiremnents of 10 CFR 50.54(t), notwithstanding any provision that nay have been in their Technical Specifications prior to the issuance of 10 CFR 3u.54(t) or that have been added since its issuance.Accordingly, you are requested to assure that your provisions for carrying out an independent audit of your energnecy preparedness program is in accordance with 1U CFR 50.54(t).  
            notwithstanding any provision that nay have been in their Technical Specifications prior to the issuance of 10 CFR 3u.54(t) or that have been added since its issuance.
If your Technical Specifications contain a provision that is less frequent than the regulations, you should request the staff to modify your technical specifications to conform to the rule.Because this Technical Specification is clarifying and made at the request of the Coizission, you are not required to remit a license fee for the change.This request has been approved by 01tB Clearance Nuvnber 3150-0011, wihich expires April 3J, 1985.oxtoLX(tJ.'
 
&L; Jl-9 8210040068
Accordingly, you are requested to assure that your provisions for carrying out an independent audit of your energnecy preparedness program is in accordance with 1U CFR 50.54(t). If your Technical Specifications contain a provision that is less frequent than the regulations, you should request the staff to modify your technical specifications to conform to the rule.
*SEE PREVIOUS TISSUES FOR CONCURRENCE
 
Powtr Sirereflbhi signedby'DarrellG
Because this Technical Specification is clarifying and made at the request of the Coizission, you are not required to remit a license fee for the change.
Q- 1enhut Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing g -....OFFICEO SURNAME b DATE DL: ORb #5 ' OELD*....9 7/.................8
 
?.A/?? ..QnQ.x.S. .0.l.. v ..t.e~........
This request has been approved by 01tB Clearance Nuvnber 3150-0011, wihich expires April 3J, 1985.
DL: ORB #5* LFMB*......................  
 
...... ...........
Sirereflbhi signedby
I... .........DCrutchfi .l 9/10/82 9/16/82........................  
                                                                                                'DarrellG        Q- 1enhut oxtoLX(tJ.'            &L;                 Jl-9 Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing
.............  
                  8210040068
..................
            *SEE PREVIOUS TISSUES FOR CONCURRENCE
DL: AD/SA*........................
            g        -.
ENW 19.r.sl .......9/23/82........................
                        Powtr                                                                                       . . .
I DL:... .............
            DL: ORb #5 ' OELD*                                 DL: ORB #5*
gl. e n hul .......r.............
                                                                ......................   LFMB*                            DL: AD/SA* IDL: .............
I_ _I1 NRC FORM 318 (10-80) NRCM 0240 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY USGPO: 1981-335-960  
                                                                                          ........... I... ......... ........................ ...
TO ALL LICENSEE OF OPERATING  
                                                                                      ......
POWER REACTORS Gentlemen:
    OFFICEO
SUBJECT: INCONSISTENCY  
  SURNAME b  ....                 9 7/.................8      DCrutchfi                .l                              ENW 19.r.sl ....... gl. en hul .....
BETWEEN REQUIREMENTS  
              ?.A/??  QnQ.x.S.
OF lO CFR 50.54(t)AND STANDARD TECNNICAL  
 
SPECIFICATIONS  
..   .0.l..
FOR PERFORMING
                                  v          t.e~........
AUDITS OF EMERGENCY  
                                              ..               9/10/82                    9/16/82                          9/23/82 DATE                                                      ........................   ............. ..........................................   ..r.............
PREPAREDNESS  
                                                                                                                        _ _
PROGRAMS (Generic Letter No. 82- )Section 50.54(t) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations requires that each nuclear power reactor licensee provide for an independent review of its emergency preparedness prograi at least every 12 months.It has come to our attention that the Standard Technical Specifications in use by a number of licensees and some existing plant-specific Technical Specifications require that this Inde-pendent audit be carried out every 24 months.All licensees are required to meet the requirements of 10 CFR 50.54(t), notwithstanding any provision that may have been in their Technical Specification prior to the issuance of 10 CFR 50.54(t) or that have been added since its issuance.Accordingly, you are requested to assure that your provisions for carrying out an Independent audit of your emergency prepared-ness program is in accordance with 10 CFR 50.54(t).  
NRC FORM 318 (10-80) NRCM 0240                               I OFFICIAL                   RECORD COPY
If your Technical Specifications contain a provision that Is less !frequent than the regulations, you should request the staff to modify your technical specifications to conform to the rule.8ecause this Technical Specification is clarifying and made at the request of the Commission, you are not required to remit a license fee for the change.Sincerely, Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing*SEE PREVIOUS TISSUE FOR CONCURRENCE
                                                                                                                                                    I1 USGPO: 1981-335-960
___ DL: ORB #5 OELD* Dg#5 MB D D/SA DL: DIR OFFICE~ .. ...................  
 
... .........  
TO ALL LICENSEE OF OPERATING POWER REACTORS
....... ... t ki-----r----tt-*--s r-----......  
                      Gentlemen:
.. ........................  
                      SUBJECT:     INCONSISTENCY BETWEEN REQUIREMENTS OF lO CFR 50.54(t)
........................
                                    AND STANDARD TECNNICAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR PERFORMING
SURNAME P.Q ..Qnn.Q.;Uj.I  
                                    AUDITS OF EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PROGRAMS
.Qm .ff atA.........P
                                    (Generic Letter No. 82- )
.DC FMi r ia DEisenhut DA T E ..l2 9./7..8.2  
                      Section 50.54(t) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations requires that each nuclear power reactor licensee provide for an independent review of its emergency preparedness prograi at least every 12 months.
... ..... ....2 ..L82 8 2 / /82 J....DAC F_.._......  
 
.....R..FA.. ... Y .... ...... .. ... ....NRC FORMG 318 (10-80) NRCM 0240 O FFICIA L RECUOR D C OPY USGPO: 1981-335-ME  
It has come to our attention that the Standard Technical Specifications in use by a number of licensees and some existing plant-specific Technical Specifications require that this Inde- pendent audit be carried out every 24 months.
TO'ALL LICENSEE OF OPERATING  
 
POWER REACTORS Gentlemen:
All licensees are required to meet the requirements of 10 CFR
SUBJECT: INCONSISTENCY  
                      50.54(t), notwithstanding any provision that may have been in their Technical Specification prior to the issuance of 10 CFR
BETWEEN REQUIREMIENTS  
                      50.54(t) or that have been added since its issuance.
OF 10 CFR 50.54(t)AND STANDARD TECHNICAL  
 
SPECIFICATIONS  
Accordingly, you are requested to assure that your provisions for carrying out an Independent audit of your emergency prepared- ness program is in accordance with 10 CFR 50.54(t). If your Technical Specifications contain a provision that Is less !
FOR PERFORMING
                      frequent than the regulations, you should request the staff to modify your technical specifications to conform to the rule.
AUDITS OF EMERGENCY  
 
PREPAREDNESS  
8ecause this Technical Specification is clarifying and made at the request of the Commission, you are not required to remit a license fee for the change.
PROGRAMS (Generic Letter No. 82- )Section 50.54(t) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations requires that each nuclear power reactor licensee provide for q an independent review of at least every 12 months.It has come to our attention that the Standard Technical Specifications in use by a number of licensees and some existing plant-specific Technical Specifications require that this inde-pendent audit be carried out every 24 months.All licensees are required to meet the requirements of 10 CFR 50.54(t), nof iithstanding any provision that may have been in.their Technical Specification prior to the issuance of 10 CFR 50.54(t) or that have been added since its issuance.Accordingly, you are requested to assure that your provisions for carrying out an independent audit of your emergency prepared-ness program is in accordance with 10 CFR 50.54(t).  
 
If your Technical Specifications contain a provision that is lessAthan-QQ6i-e regulations, you should request the staff to modify your D A technical specifications to the rule. ;t5 Because this Technical Specificato°
Sincerely, Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing
of the Conmission, you -qfibtred to remit a license fee for the charge.a{ (AI Sincerely, Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing ,_ ,,_- ,§l .,I r OFFICEDL:  
              *SEE PREVIOUS TISSUE FOR CONCURRENCE
DL: ORB #5 FMB DL: A/AD/SA DL: DIR..............  
    ___       DL: ORB #5           OELD*                   Dg#5         MB               D         D/SA .. DL:     DIR
.........t. .. ........................  
                                                                                                                      r-----......
....... .................  
                                                                                                            ........................   ........................
... ...... *...............  
    OFFICE~ .. ................... ...   ......... ....... ... t              ki-----r----tt-*--s SURNAME
.....................  
      DAT E
........................
      DAC
SURNAMEO ..B.¶Onn/.;..  
              P.Q .. Qnn.Q.;Uj.I
...2. _ ...f1 ....TlJ8........8.2.....  
                  ..l2
T 11.8.2 ..... O.n8hu.2 ........................
                            .
DATEt ..... .17/8 1..... ...!. ...../. /*n .... ../.~.../ ... ./ .................
            F_.._...... R..FA..
NRC FORM 318 (10-80) NRCM 0240 O FFICIA L R EC O RD C OPY.USGPO: 1981l 3960}}
                                  Qm.ff atA.........PDC
                                    9./7..8.2
                                                          .....
                                                                  .
                                                                    2 FMir
                                                                                            ... Y
                                                                                                    82 ia
                                                                                                    ....
                                                                                                            DEisenhut
                                                                                                            .../ /82 ..... . ... . .L82
                                                                                                            . .....                 ..
                                                                                                                                        J....
                                                                                                                                          ...       ....
NRC FORMG 318 (10-80) NRCM 0240                             O FFICIA L RECUOR D C OPY                                                     USGPO: 1981-335-ME
 
TO'ALL LICENSEE OF OPERATING POWER REACTORS
                      Gentlemen:
                      SUBJECT:         INCONSISTENCY BETWEEN REQUIREMIENTS OF 10 CFR 50.54(t)
                                        AND STANDARD TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR PERFORMING
                                        AUDITS OF EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PROGRAMS
                                        (Generic Letter No. 82- )
                      Section 50.54(t) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations requires that each nuclear power reactor licensee provide for                                                                         q an independent review of at least every 12 months.
 
It has come to our attention that the Standard Technical Specifications in use by a number of licensees and some existing plant-specific Technical Specifications require that this inde- pendent audit be carried out every 24 months.
 
All licensees are required to meet the requirements of 10 CFR
                      50.54(t), nof iithstanding any provision that may have been in
                      .their Technical Specification prior to the issuance of 10 CFR
                      50.54(t) or that have been added since its issuance.
 
Accordingly, you are requested to assure that your provisions for carrying out an independent audit of your emergency prepared- ness program is in accordance with 10 CFR 50.54(t). If your Technical Specifications contain a provision that is lessAthan
              -QQ6i-e         regulations, you should request the staff to modify your                                                                 D   A
                      technical specifications to                                         the rule.                                     ;t5 Because this Technical Specificato°
                                          of the Conmission, you                                           -qfibtred         to remit a license fee for the charge.
 
Sincerely, Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing a{                (AI
      ,_                     ,,_- ,§l       .           ,I                     r OFFICEDL:.............. ......... t.               .. DL:        ORB #5 .......
                                                            ........................ FMB ................. ......... A/AD/SA
                                                                                                            DL:                        DL: DIR
                                                                                                                      *............... ..................... ........................
  SURNAMEO   ..B.¶Onn/.;..                       ...2...
                                                      . _                  f1       ....                             11.8.2 ..... O.n8hu.2 ........................
                                                                                                            TlJ8........8.2.....
                                                                                                            T
      DATEt                     .....     .17/8         1........ !.             ..... /. /*n .... .. /.~.../                 ...       .       / .................
NRC FORM 318 (10-80) NRCM 0240                                 O FFICIA L R EC O RD C OPY                                                                     .USGPO:     1981l 3960}}


{{GL-Nav}}
{{GL-Nav}}

Latest revision as of 03:17, 24 November 2019

NRC Generic Letter 1982-017: Inconsistency Between Requirements of 10 CFR 50.54(t) and Standard Technical Specifications for Performing Audits of Emergency Preparedness Programs
ML031080321
Person / Time
Site: Beaver Valley, Millstone, Hatch, Monticello, Calvert Cliffs, Dresden, Davis Besse, Peach Bottom, Browns Ferry, Salem, Oconee, Mcguire, Nine Mile Point, Palisades, Palo Verde, Perry, Indian Point, Fermi, Kewaunee, Catawba, Harris, Wolf Creek, Saint Lucie, Point Beach, Oyster Creek, Watts Bar, Grand Gulf, Cooper, Sequoyah, Byron, Pilgrim, Arkansas Nuclear, Braidwood, Susquehanna, Summer, Prairie Island, Columbia, Seabrook, Brunswick, Surry, Limerick, North Anna, Turkey Point, River Bend, Vermont Yankee, Crystal River, Haddam Neck, Ginna, Diablo Canyon, Callaway, Vogtle, Waterford, Duane Arnold, Farley, Robinson, Clinton, South Texas, San Onofre, Cook, Yankee Rowe, Maine Yankee, Quad Cities, Humboldt Bay, La Crosse, Big Rock Point, Rancho Seco, Zion, Midland, Bellefonte, Fort Calhoun, FitzPatrick, McGuire, LaSalle, 05000514, 05000000, 05000515, Zimmer, Fort Saint Vrain, Washington Public Power Supply System, Shoreham, Satsop, Trojan, Bailly, Atlantic Nuclear Power Plant, Perkins, Cherokee, Marble Hill, Hartsville, Phipps Bend, Yellow Creek, Crane
Issue date: 10/11/1982
From: Eisenhut D
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
References
GL-82-017, NUDOCS 8210040068
Download: ML031080321 (3)


I

OCT 01 198 TO ALL LICENSEES ANM APPLICANiTS FOR OPERATINiG P(AlER REACTORS

AiO 1OOLJERS OF CONSTRUCTION PERHITS FOR POWER REACTORS

Gentlenen:

SUBJECT: INCOWI'SISTENCY BETWEEN REQUIREft.NTS OF 10 CFR 50.54(t)

AND) STAiIDARU TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION4S FOR PERFORIMING

AUDITS OF EIERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PisOGRA.1S

(Generic Letter No. 82-17)

Section 50.54(t) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations requires that each nuclear power reactor licensee provide for an independent review of its einergency preparedness program at least every 12 months.

It has comie to our attention that the Standard Technical Specifications in use by a number of licensees and some existing plant-specific Technical Specifications require that this independent audit be carried out every 24 months.

All licensees are required to neet the requiremnents of 10 CFR 50.54(t),

notwithstanding any provision that nay have been in their Technical Specifications prior to the issuance of 10 CFR 3u.54(t) or that have been added since its issuance.

Accordingly, you are requested to assure that your provisions for carrying out an independent audit of your energnecy preparedness program is in accordance with 1U CFR 50.54(t). If your Technical Specifications contain a provision that is less frequent than the regulations, you should request the staff to modify your technical specifications to conform to the rule.

Because this Technical Specification is clarifying and made at the request of the Coizission, you are not required to remit a license fee for the change.

This request has been approved by 01tB Clearance Nuvnber 3150-0011, wihich expires April 3J, 1985.

Sirereflbhi signedby

'DarrellG Q- 1enhut oxtoLX(tJ.' &L; Jl-9 Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing

8210040068

  • SEE PREVIOUS TISSUES FOR CONCURRENCE

g -.

Powtr . . .

DL: ORb #5 ' OELD* DL: ORB #5*

...................... LFMB* DL: AD/SA* IDL: .............

........... I... ......... ........................ ...

......

OFFICEO

SURNAME b .... 9 7/.................8 DCrutchfi .l ENW 19.r.sl ....... gl. en hul .....

?.A/?? QnQ.x.S.

.. .0.l..

v t.e~........

.. 9/10/82 9/16/82 9/23/82 DATE ........................ ............. .......................................... ..r.............

_ _

NRC FORM 318 (10-80) NRCM 0240 I OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

I1 USGPO: 1981-335-960

TO ALL LICENSEE OF OPERATING POWER REACTORS

Gentlemen:

SUBJECT: INCONSISTENCY BETWEEN REQUIREMENTS OF lO CFR 50.54(t)

AND STANDARD TECNNICAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR PERFORMING

AUDITS OF EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PROGRAMS

(Generic Letter No. 82- )

Section 50.54(t) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations requires that each nuclear power reactor licensee provide for an independent review of its emergency preparedness prograi at least every 12 months.

It has come to our attention that the Standard Technical Specifications in use by a number of licensees and some existing plant-specific Technical Specifications require that this Inde- pendent audit be carried out every 24 months.

All licensees are required to meet the requirements of 10 CFR

50.54(t), notwithstanding any provision that may have been in their Technical Specification prior to the issuance of 10 CFR

50.54(t) or that have been added since its issuance.

Accordingly, you are requested to assure that your provisions for carrying out an Independent audit of your emergency prepared- ness program is in accordance with 10 CFR 50.54(t). If your Technical Specifications contain a provision that Is less !

frequent than the regulations, you should request the staff to modify your technical specifications to conform to the rule.

8ecause this Technical Specification is clarifying and made at the request of the Commission, you are not required to remit a license fee for the change.

Sincerely, Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing

  • SEE PREVIOUS TISSUE FOR CONCURRENCE

___ DL: ORB #5 OELD* Dg#5 MB D D/SA .. DL: DIR

r-----......

........................ ........................

OFFICE~ .. ................... ... ......... ....... ... t ki-----r----tt-*--s SURNAME

DAT E

DAC

P.Q .. Qnn.Q.;Uj.I

..l2

.

F_.._...... R..FA..

Qm.ff atA.........PDC

9./7..8.2

.....

.

2 FMir

... Y

82 ia

....

DEisenhut

.../ /82 ..... . ... . .L82

. ..... ..

J....

... ....

NRC FORMG 318 (10-80) NRCM 0240 O FFICIA L RECUOR D C OPY USGPO: 1981-335-ME

TO'ALL LICENSEE OF OPERATING POWER REACTORS

Gentlemen:

SUBJECT: INCONSISTENCY BETWEEN REQUIREMIENTS OF 10 CFR 50.54(t)

AND STANDARD TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR PERFORMING

AUDITS OF EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PROGRAMS

(Generic Letter No. 82- )

Section 50.54(t) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations requires that each nuclear power reactor licensee provide for q an independent review of at least every 12 months.

It has come to our attention that the Standard Technical Specifications in use by a number of licensees and some existing plant-specific Technical Specifications require that this inde- pendent audit be carried out every 24 months.

All licensees are required to meet the requirements of 10 CFR

50.54(t), nof iithstanding any provision that may have been in

.their Technical Specification prior to the issuance of 10 CFR

50.54(t) or that have been added since its issuance.

Accordingly, you are requested to assure that your provisions for carrying out an independent audit of your emergency prepared- ness program is in accordance with 10 CFR 50.54(t). If your Technical Specifications contain a provision that is lessAthan

-QQ6i-e regulations, you should request the staff to modify your D A

technical specifications to the rule. ;t5 Because this Technical Specificato°

of the Conmission, you -qfibtred to remit a license fee for the charge.

Sincerely, Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing a{ (AI

,_ ,,_- ,§l . ,I r OFFICEDL:.............. ......... t. .. DL: ORB #5 .......

........................ FMB ................. ......... A/AD/SA

DL: DL: DIR

  • ............... ..................... ........................

SURNAMEO ..B.¶Onn/.;.. ...2...

. _ f1 .... 11.8.2 ..... O.n8hu.2 ........................

TlJ8........8.2.....

T

DATEt ..... .17/8 1........ !. ..... /. /*n .... .. /.~.../ ... . / .................

NRC FORM 318 (10-80) NRCM 0240 O FFICIA L R EC O RD C OPY .USGPO: 1981l 3960

Template:GL-Nav