Information Notice 2009-04, Age-Related Constant Support Degradation: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 14: Line 14:
| page count = 4
| page count = 4
}}
}}
{{#Wiki_filter:ML090340754 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION WASHINGTON, DC 20555-0001 February 18, 2009 NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 2009-04: AGE-RELATED CONSTANT SUPPORT DEGRADATION
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES
 
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
 
OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION
 
WASHINGTON, DC 20555-0001 February 18, 2009 NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 2009-04:                   AGE-RELATED CONSTANT SUPPORT
 
DEGRADATION


==ADDRESSEES==
==ADDRESSEES==
All holders of operating licenses or construction permits for nuclear power reactors, except those who have permanently ceased operations and have certified that fuel has been permanently removed from the reactor vessel.
All holders of operating licenses or construction permits for nuclear power reactors, except
 
those who have permanently ceased operations and have certified that fuel has been
 
permanently removed from the reactor vessel.


==PURPOSE==
==PURPOSE==
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this information notice to alert addressees to a possible age-related degradation of mechanical constant supports that may adversely impact design stresses on piping systems. It is expected that recipients will review the information for applicability to their facilities and consider actions, as appropriate, to avoid
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this information notice to alert
 
addressees to a possible age-related degradation of mechanical constant supports that may
 
adversely impact design stresses on piping systems. It is expected that recipients will review
 
the information for applicability to their facilities and consider actions, as appropriate, to avoid
 
similar problems. However, suggestions contained in this information notice are not NRC


similar problems.  However, suggestions contained in this information notice are not NRC requirements; therefore, no specific action or written response is required.
requirements; therefore, no specific action or written response is required.


==DESCRIPTION OF CIRCUMSTANCES==
==DESCRIPTION OF CIRCUMSTANCES==
During the fourteenth refueling outage at the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 2, Arizona Public Service (the licensee) tested four safety-related constant supports as part of an investigation for failures on these components and associated beam attachments for these supports.  The testing performed by the licensee measured deviations in the supporting force of between 8.7 and 13.3 percent.  The allowable deviation of the supporting force, including
During the fourteenth refueling outage at the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 2, Arizona Public Service (the licensee) tested four safety-related constant supports as part of an


friction, specified in American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Section III, Division I, Subsection NF, is 6 percent.  The licensee and the vendor preliminarily concluded that deviations in the supporting force resulted from wear on the linkages and increased friction between the various moving parts and joints within the constant support.  The wear on the linkages may have been caused by cyclic loading or vibration, from the main steam lines.  The
investigation for failures on these components and associated beam attachments for these


measured vibrations on the main steam lines were below the analyzed values of displacement and velocity but were above the ASME OM-3 value of 0.5 inches per second.
supports. The testing performed by the licensee measured deviations in the supporting force of


The licensee conducted physical inspections and engineering evaluations to determine whether any structural damage to the main steam piping had occurred. It did not identify any main steam line piping operability concerns, although analyzed margins to ASME code allowable stresses were reduced. The licensee subsequently restored these constant supports and
between 8.7 and 13.3 percent. The allowable deviation of the supporting force, including


evaluated the effect on the steam generator nozzles with the measured deviations of supporting force to ensure that ASME code limits were not exceeded.
friction, specified in American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Section III, Division I,
Subsection NF, is 6 percent. The licensee and the vendor preliminarily concluded that
 
deviations in the supporting force resulted from wear on the linkages and increased friction
 
between the various moving parts and joints within the constant support. The wear on the
 
linkages may have been caused by cyclic loading or vibration, from the main steam lines. The
 
measured vibrations on the main steam lines were below the analyzed values of displacement
 
and velocity but were above the ASME OM-3 value of 0.5 inches per second.
 
The licensee conducted physical inspections and engineering evaluations to determine whether
 
any structural damage to the main steam piping had occurred. It did not identify any main
 
steam line piping operability concerns, although analyzed margins to ASME code allowable
 
stresses were reduced. The licensee subsequently restored these constant supports and
 
evaluated the effect on the steam generator nozzles with the measured deviations of supporting
 
force to ensure that ASME code limits were not exceeded.


==BACKGROUND==
==BACKGROUND==
Constant support hangers are designed to provide a substantially uniform supporting force for a
Constant support hangers are designed to provide a substantially uniform supporting force for a


piping system throughout its full range of pipe movement. This is accomplished through the use of a spring operating in conjunction with a lever, in such a way that the spring force times the distance to the main lever pivot is always equal to and opposite of the pipe load times its distance from the main pivot point (see illustration below). These constant support hangers have been used to limit nozzle loads on pipes that experience large thermal variations from cold
piping system throughout its full range of pipe movement. This is accomplished through the use
 
of a spring operating in conjunction with a lever, in such a way that the spring force times the
 
distance to the main lever pivot is always equal to and opposite of the pipe load times its
 
distance from the main pivot point (see illustration below). These constant support hangers
 
have been used to limit nozzle loads on pipes that experience large thermal variations from cold


conditions to normal operating conditions.
conditions to normal operating conditions.
Line 45: Line 96:
The licensee for Palo Verde does not routinely test these mechanical constant supports, and
The licensee for Palo Verde does not routinely test these mechanical constant supports, and


these supports are not part of any routine preventive maintenance program. The vendor, ITT-Grinnell (now Anvil), did not require any routine maintenance on these supports. The physical condition of the constant supports is visually examined as required by the ASME Section XI, Subsection IWF, which calls for inspecting a certain number of supports every outage. This required visual inspection does not determine whether these supports exceed ASME code allowable load deviation of 6 percent. Although there is no regulatory requirement to do so, licensees may wish to consider testing the constant supports (e.g., displacement testing while
these supports are not part of any routine preventive maintenance program. The vendor, ITT-
Grinnell (now Anvil), did not require any routine maintenance on these supports. The physical
 
condition of the constant supports is visually examined as required by the ASME Section XI,
Subsection IWF, which calls for inspecting a certain number of supports every outage. This
 
required visual inspection does not determine whether these supports exceed ASME code
 
allowable load deviation of 6 percent. Although there is no regulatory requirement to do so, licensees may wish to consider testing the constant supports (e.g., displacement testing while
 
measuring load) to identify constant supports that exceed the ASME code allowable load
 
deviation of 6 percent.
 
The licensee and the vendor have preliminarily determined that deviations in the supporting
 
force resulted from wear on the linkages and increased friction between the various moving


measuring load) to identify constant supports that exceed the ASME code allowable load deviation of 6 percent.
parts and joints within the constant support. This age-related degradation mechanism may


The licensee and the vendor have preliminarily determined that deviations in the supporting force resulted from wear on the linkages and increased friction between the various moving
affect the supporting force provided by constant supports and can adversely affect the analyzed


parts and joints within the constant support.  This age-related degradation mechanism may affect the supporting force provided by constant supports and can adversely affect the analyzed stresses of connected piping systems.
stresses of connected piping systems.


==CONTACT==
==CONTACT==
This information notice requires no specific action or written response. Please direct any
This information notice requires no specific action or written response. Please direct any
 
questions about this matter to the technical contacts listed below or the appropriate Office of


questions about this matter to the technical contacts listed below or the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.
Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.


/RA/
/RA/
Timothy J. McGinty, Director Division of Policy and Rulemaking Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
                                              Timothy J. McGinty, Director


Technical Contacts: Jim Melfi, Region IV Gerond George, Region IV 623-386-3638 817-276-6562 E-mail:  Jim.Melfi@nrc.gov E-mail:  Gerond.George@nrc.gov
Division of Policy and Rulemaking


Alexander Tsirigotis, NRR 301-415-2258 E-mail:  Alexander.Tsirigotis@nrc.gov
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation


Note: NRC generic communications may be found on the NRC public Web site, http://www.nrc.gov, under Electronic Reading Room/Document Collections.
Technical Contacts:    Jim Melfi, Region IV                  Gerond George, Region IV
 
623-386-3638                          817-276-6562 E-mail: Jim.Melfi@nrc.gov              E-mail: Gerond.George@nrc.gov
 
Alexander Tsirigotis, NRR
 
301-415-2258 E-mail: Alexander.Tsirigotis@nrc.gov
 
Note: NRC generic communications may be found on the NRC public Web site, http://www.nrc.gov, under Electronic Reading Room/Document Collections.


==CONTACT==
==CONTACT==
This information notice requires no specific action or written response. Please direct any
This information notice requires no specific action or written response. Please direct any
 
questions about this matter to the technical contacts listed below or the appropriate Office of
 
Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.
 
/RA/
                                              Timothy J. McGinty, Director
 
Division of Policy and Rulemaking
 
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
 
Technical Contacts:    Jim Melfi, Region IV                  Gerond George, Region IV
 
623-386-3638                          817-276-6562 E-mail: Jim.Melfi@nrc.gov              E-mail: Gerond.George@nrc.gov
 
Alexander Tsirigotis, NRR
 
301-415-2258 E-mail: Alexander.Tsirigotis@nrc.gov


questions about this matter to the technical contacts listed below or the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.
Note: NRC generic communications may be found on the NRC public Web site, http://www.nrc.gov, under Electronic Reading Room/Document Collections.


/RA/ 
Distribution: IN Reading File Albert Wong
Timothy J. McGinty, Director Division of Policy and Rulemaking Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation


Technical Contacts: Jim Melfi, Region IV Gerond George, Region IV 623-386-3638 817-276-6562 E-mail: Jim.Melfi@nrc.gov E-mail: Gerond.George@nrc.gov
ADAMS Accession Number: ML090340754 OFFICE    RIV:DRP          TECH EDITOR        EMCB:DE          BC:EMCB:DE      D:DE


Alexander Tsirigotis, NRR 301-415-2258 E-mail:  Alexander.Tsirigotis@nrc.gov
NAME      JMelfi            KAzariah-Kribbs    ATsirigotis      KManoly        PHiland


Note: NRC generic communications may be found on the NRC public Web site, http://www.nrc.gov, under Electronic Reading Room/Document Collections.
DATE      02/03/2009 email 02/11/2009 email  02/06/2009        02/12/2009      02/12/2009 OFFICE    BC:RER2          PGCB:DPR          PGCB:DPR          BC:PGCB        D:DPR


Distribution:  IN Reading File  Albert Wong
NAME      RAuluck          DBeaulieu          CHawes            MMurphy        TMcGinty


ADAMS Accession Number: ML090340754 OFFICE RIV:DRP TECH EDITOREMCB:DEBC:EMCB:DE D:DE NAME JMelfi KAzariah-Kribbs ATsirigotis KManoly PHiland DATE 02/03/2009 email 02/11/2009 email 02/06/2009 02/12/2009 02/12/2009 OFFICE BC:RER2 PGCB:DPR PGCB:DPRBC:PGCBD:DPR NAME RAuluck DBeaulieu CHawes MMurphy TMcGinty DATE 02/17/2009 02/17/2009 02/18/2009 02/18/2009 02/18/2009 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY}}
DATE     02/17/2009       02/17/2009         02/18/2009       02/18/2009     02/18/2009 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY}}


{{Information notice-Nav}}
{{Information notice-Nav}}

Latest revision as of 10:15, 14 November 2019

Age-Related Constant Support Degradation
ML090340754
Person / Time
Issue date: 02/18/2009
From: Mcginty T
Division of Policy and Rulemaking
To:
Beaulieu, D P, NRR/DPR, 415-3243
References
IN 2009-04
Download: ML090340754 (4)


UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION

WASHINGTON, DC 20555-0001 February 18, 2009 NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 2009-04: AGE-RELATED CONSTANT SUPPORT

DEGRADATION

ADDRESSEES

All holders of operating licenses or construction permits for nuclear power reactors, except

those who have permanently ceased operations and have certified that fuel has been

permanently removed from the reactor vessel.

PURPOSE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this information notice to alert

addressees to a possible age-related degradation of mechanical constant supports that may

adversely impact design stresses on piping systems. It is expected that recipients will review

the information for applicability to their facilities and consider actions, as appropriate, to avoid

similar problems. However, suggestions contained in this information notice are not NRC

requirements; therefore, no specific action or written response is required.

DESCRIPTION OF CIRCUMSTANCES

During the fourteenth refueling outage at the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 2, Arizona Public Service (the licensee) tested four safety-related constant supports as part of an

investigation for failures on these components and associated beam attachments for these

supports. The testing performed by the licensee measured deviations in the supporting force of

between 8.7 and 13.3 percent. The allowable deviation of the supporting force, including

friction, specified in American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)Section III, Division I,

Subsection NF, is 6 percent. The licensee and the vendor preliminarily concluded that

deviations in the supporting force resulted from wear on the linkages and increased friction

between the various moving parts and joints within the constant support. The wear on the

linkages may have been caused by cyclic loading or vibration, from the main steam lines. The

measured vibrations on the main steam lines were below the analyzed values of displacement

and velocity but were above the ASME OM-3 value of 0.5 inches per second.

The licensee conducted physical inspections and engineering evaluations to determine whether

any structural damage to the main steam piping had occurred. It did not identify any main

steam line piping operability concerns, although analyzed margins to ASME code allowable

stresses were reduced. The licensee subsequently restored these constant supports and

evaluated the effect on the steam generator nozzles with the measured deviations of supporting

force to ensure that ASME code limits were not exceeded.

BACKGROUND

Constant support hangers are designed to provide a substantially uniform supporting force for a

piping system throughout its full range of pipe movement. This is accomplished through the use

of a spring operating in conjunction with a lever, in such a way that the spring force times the

distance to the main lever pivot is always equal to and opposite of the pipe load times its

distance from the main pivot point (see illustration below). These constant support hangers

have been used to limit nozzle loads on pipes that experience large thermal variations from cold

conditions to normal operating conditions.

DISCUSSION

The licensee for Palo Verde does not routinely test these mechanical constant supports, and

these supports are not part of any routine preventive maintenance program. The vendor, ITT-

Grinnell (now Anvil), did not require any routine maintenance on these supports. The physical

condition of the constant supports is visually examined as required by the ASME Section XI,

Subsection IWF, which calls for inspecting a certain number of supports every outage. This

required visual inspection does not determine whether these supports exceed ASME code

allowable load deviation of 6 percent. Although there is no regulatory requirement to do so, licensees may wish to consider testing the constant supports (e.g., displacement testing while

measuring load) to identify constant supports that exceed the ASME code allowable load

deviation of 6 percent.

The licensee and the vendor have preliminarily determined that deviations in the supporting

force resulted from wear on the linkages and increased friction between the various moving

parts and joints within the constant support. This age-related degradation mechanism may

affect the supporting force provided by constant supports and can adversely affect the analyzed

stresses of connected piping systems.

CONTACT

This information notice requires no specific action or written response. Please direct any

questions about this matter to the technical contacts listed below or the appropriate Office of

Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.

/RA/

Timothy J. McGinty, Director

Division of Policy and Rulemaking

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Technical Contacts: Jim Melfi, Region IV Gerond George, Region IV

623-386-3638 817-276-6562 E-mail: Jim.Melfi@nrc.gov E-mail: Gerond.George@nrc.gov

Alexander Tsirigotis, NRR

301-415-2258 E-mail: Alexander.Tsirigotis@nrc.gov

Note: NRC generic communications may be found on the NRC public Web site, http://www.nrc.gov, under Electronic Reading Room/Document Collections.

CONTACT

This information notice requires no specific action or written response. Please direct any

questions about this matter to the technical contacts listed below or the appropriate Office of

Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.

/RA/

Timothy J. McGinty, Director

Division of Policy and Rulemaking

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Technical Contacts: Jim Melfi, Region IV Gerond George, Region IV

623-386-3638 817-276-6562 E-mail: Jim.Melfi@nrc.gov E-mail: Gerond.George@nrc.gov

Alexander Tsirigotis, NRR

301-415-2258 E-mail: Alexander.Tsirigotis@nrc.gov

Note: NRC generic communications may be found on the NRC public Web site, http://www.nrc.gov, under Electronic Reading Room/Document Collections.

Distribution: IN Reading File Albert Wong

ADAMS Accession Number: ML090340754 OFFICE RIV:DRP TECH EDITOR EMCB:DE BC:EMCB:DE D:DE

NAME JMelfi KAzariah-Kribbs ATsirigotis KManoly PHiland

DATE 02/03/2009 email 02/11/2009 email 02/06/2009 02/12/2009 02/12/2009 OFFICE BC:RER2 PGCB:DPR PGCB:DPR BC:PGCB D:DPR

NAME RAuluck DBeaulieu CHawes MMurphy TMcGinty

DATE 02/17/2009 02/17/2009 02/18/2009 02/18/2009 02/18/2009 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY