ML15027A206: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:U n i t e d S t a t e s C o u r t o f A p p e a l s F O R T H E D I S T R I C T O F C O L U M B I A C I R C U I T____________N o. 1 4-1 2 2 5 S e p te m b e r T e r m , 2 0 1 4 NRC-50-352-LR NRC-79FR63 650 Fil ed O n: Januar y 27, 201 5 [1 5 3 4 2 6 6]Natur al Resou rce s De f ense Council, Pet itioner v.U.S. Nuc lear Reg ulator y Comm ission an d United Stat es of Am erica, Res pondent s------------------------------Exel on G ener ation Com pany, L LC, I nter venor O R D E R Upon consider ation of t he m otion f or leave to inter vene f iled by: Exel on G ener ation Com pany, L LC, it is ORDERED t hat the mo tion be g rant ed.Circuit Rules 28 (d) and 32(a)(2) g overn t he f ili ng of br ief s b y inter venors. A sched ule f or the f ili ng of br ief s wil l be est ablished b y f utur e or der. T hat orde r w ill aut om atically provide br ief ing only f or inter venors on t he s ide of r espond ents. Any inter venor(s) intending t o pa rt icipate in suppor t of pet itioner m ust so not if y the cour t, in w riting , w ithin 1 4 da ys of t he d ate of t his or der.Such notif ication mu st include a sta tem ent of t he iss ues to be r aised by the inter venor(s). T his notif ication w ill allow t ailoring of t he b rief ing sc hedule to provide t ime f or a br ief as int ervenor on the side o f pet itioner. Failure to subm it n otif ication could res ult in an inter venor b eing den ied leave to f ile a b rief.Int ervenors su ppor ting t he s am e pa rt y are rem inded t hat they mus t f ile a j oint brief or cer tif y to the cour t w hy a s epar ate brief is neces sar y. I nter venors' at tent ion is part icularly direct ed to D.C. Circ uit Handbook of Pr act ice an d I nter nal Pr ocedur es 38-3 9 (2013), w hich d escr ibes"una ccept able" g roun ds f or f ili ng se para te brief s. Failure to com ply with t his or der ma y resu lt in the impos ition o f sa nct ions. See D.C. Cir. Rule 38.FO R THE COURT:
{{#Wiki_filter:USCA Case #14-1225            Document #1534266                  Filed: 01/27/2015      Page 1 of 1 United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
M ark J. Lan g er, Cler k BY:/s/Amy Yac isin Deput y Clerk USCA Case #14-1225      Document #1534266            Filed: 01/27/2015      Page 1 of 1}}
____________
No. 14-1225                                                            September Term, 2014 NRC-50-352-LR NRC-79FR63650 Filed On: January 27, 2015 [1534266]
Natural Resources Defense Council, Petitioner v.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and United States of America, Respondents
------------------------------
Exelon Generation Company, LLC, Intervenor ORDER Upon consideration of the motion for leave to intervene filed by:
Exelon Generation Company, LLC, it is ORDERED that the motion be granted.
Circuit Rules 28(d) and 32(a)(2) govern the filing of briefs by intervenors. A schedule for the filing of briefs will be established by future order. That order will automatically provide briefing only for intervenors on the side of respondents. Any intervenor(s) intending to participate in support of petitioner must so notify the court, in writing, within 14 days of the date of this order.
Such notification must include a statement of the issues to be raised by the intervenor(s). This notification will allow tailoring of the briefing schedule to provide time for a brief as intervenor on the side of petitioner. Failure to submit notification could result in an intervenor being denied leave to file a brief.
Intervenors supporting the same party are reminded that they must file a joint brief or certify to the court why a separate brief is necessary. Intervenors' attention is particularly directed to D.C. Circuit Handbook of Practice and Internal Procedures 38-39 (2013), which describes "unacceptable" grounds for filing separate briefs. Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions. See D.C. Cir. Rule 38.
FOR THE COURT:
Mark J. Langer, Clerk BY:     /s/
Amy Yacisin Deputy Clerk}}

Revision as of 17:37, 31 October 2019

Court Order Granting Exelon Motion to Intervene - 1-27-15 - DC Cir 14-1225 - NRDC V NRC
ML15027A206
Person / Time
Site: Limerick Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 01/27/2015
From: Langer M, Yacisin A
US Federal Judiciary, US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
To:
NRC/OGC
Creedon. meghan
References
14-1225, 1534266, NRC-50-352-LR, NRC-79FR63650
Download: ML15027A206 (1)
v • d • e


Text

USCA Case #14-1225 Document #1534266 Filed: 01/27/2015 Page 1 of 1 United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 14-1225 September Term, 2014 NRC-50-352-LR NRC-79FR63650 Filed On: January 27, 2015 [1534266]

Natural Resources Defense Council, Petitioner v.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and United States of America, Respondents

Exelon Generation Company, LLC, Intervenor ORDER Upon consideration of the motion for leave to intervene filed by:

Exelon Generation Company, LLC, it is ORDERED that the motion be granted.

Circuit Rules 28(d) and 32(a)(2) govern the filing of briefs by intervenors. A schedule for the filing of briefs will be established by future order. That order will automatically provide briefing only for intervenors on the side of respondents. Any intervenor(s) intending to participate in support of petitioner must so notify the court, in writing, within 14 days of the date of this order.

Such notification must include a statement of the issues to be raised by the intervenor(s). This notification will allow tailoring of the briefing schedule to provide time for a brief as intervenor on the side of petitioner. Failure to submit notification could result in an intervenor being denied leave to file a brief.

Intervenors supporting the same party are reminded that they must file a joint brief or certify to the court why a separate brief is necessary. Intervenors' attention is particularly directed to D.C. Circuit Handbook of Practice and Internal Procedures 38-39 (2013), which describes "unacceptable" grounds for filing separate briefs. Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions. See D.C. Cir. Rule 38.

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk BY: /s/

Amy Yacisin Deputy Clerk

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML15027A206&oldid=2038693"