ML18184A118: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:NRC FORM 591M PART 1 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY | {{#Wiki_filter:NRC FORM 591M PART 1 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION | ||
COMMISSION | (07-2012) | ||
(07-2012) | 10CFR 2,201 SAFETY INSPECTION REPORT AND COMPLIANCE INSPECTION | ||
10CFR 2 , 201 SAFETY INSPECTION | 1. LICENSEE/LOCATION INSPECTED: 2. NRG/REGIONAL OFFICE | ||
REPORT AND COMPLIANCE | JAN X-Ray Services d/b/a JANX Region III | ||
INSPECTION | 8550 East Michigan A venue, Parma, MI 49269 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission | ||
1. LICENSEE/LOCATION | Location Inspected: Job Site in Grayling, MI 2443 Warrenville Road, Suite 210 | ||
INSPECTED: | Lisle, IL 60532-4352 | ||
JAN X-Ray Services d/b/a JANX 8550 East Michigan A venue, Parma, MI 49269 Location Inspected: | REPORT NUMBER(S) 2018001 | ||
Job Site in Grayling, MI | 3. DOCKET NUMBER(S) 4. LICENSE NUMBER(S) 5. DATE(S) OF INSPECTION | ||
030-11772 21-16560-01 June 19, 2018 | |||
LICENSEE: | |||
The inspection was an examination of the activities conducted under your license as they relate to radiation safety and to compliance with the Nuclear | |||
2443 Warrenville | Regulatory Commission (NRC) rules and regulations and the conditions of your license. The inspection consisted of selective examinations of | ||
Road, Suite 210 Lisle, IL 60532-4352 | procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observations by the inspector. The inspection findings are as follows: | ||
3. DOCKET NUMBER(S) | [Z] 1. Based on the inspection findings, no violations were identified. | ||
4. LICENSE NUMBER(S) | D 2. Previous violation(s) closed. | ||
5. DATE(S) OF INSPECTION | D 3. The violations(s), specifically described to you by the inspector as non-cited violations, are not being cited because they were self-identified, | ||
030-11772 | non-repetitive, and corrective action was or is being taken, and the remaining criteria in the NRC Enforcement Policy, to exercise | ||
21-16560-01 | discretion, were satisfied. | ||
June 19, 2018 LICENSEE: | Non-cited violation(s) were discussed involving the following requirement(s): | ||
The inspection | D 4. During this inspection, certain of your activities, as described below and/or attached, were in violation of NRC requirements and are being | ||
was an examination | cited in accordance with NRC Enforcement Policy. This form is a NOTICE OF VIOLATION, which may be subject to posting in accordance | ||
of the activities | with 10CFR 19.11. | ||
conducted | (Violations and Corrective Actions) | ||
under your license as they relate to radiation | Statement of Corrective Actions | ||
safety and to compliance | I hereby state that, within 30 days, the actions described by me to the Inspector will be taken to correct the violations identified. This statement of | ||
with the Nuclear Regulatory | corrective actions is made in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 2.201 (corrective steps already taken, corrective steps which will be taken, | ||
Commission (NRC) rules and regulations | date when full compliance will be achieved). I understand that no further written response to NRC will be required, unless specifically requested. | ||
and the conditions | TITLE PRINTED NAME SIGNATURE DATE | ||
of your license. The inspection | LICENSEE'S | ||
consisted | REPRESENTATIVE | ||
of selective | NRC INSPECTOR Ryan Craffey 06/26/2018 | ||
examinations | BRANCH CHIEF Aaron Mccraw 06/29/2018 | ||
NRG FORM 591M PART 1 (07-2012) | |||
and representative | |||
records, interviews | NRC FORM 591M PART 3 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION | ||
with personnel, and observations | (07-2012) | ||
by the inspector. | 10 CFR 2.201 Docket File Information | ||
The inspection | SAFETY INSPECTION REPORT AND COMPLIANCE INSPECTION | ||
findings are as follows: [Z] 1. | 1. LICENSEE/LOCATION INSPECTED: 2. NRG/REGIONAL OFFICE | ||
findings, no violations | JAN X-Ray Services d/b/a JANX Region III | ||
were identified. | 8550 East Michigan A venue, Parma, MI 49269 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission | ||
Previous violation(s) | Location Inspected: Job Site in Grayling, MI 2443 Warrenville Road, Suite 210 | ||
Lisle, IL 60532-4352 | |||
described | REPORT NUMBER(S) 2018001 | ||
to you by the inspector | 3. DOCKET NUMBER(S) 4. LICENSE NUMBER(S) 5. DATE(S) OF INSPECTION | ||
as non-cited | 030-11772 21-16560-01 June 19, 2018 | ||
violations, are not being cited because they were self-identified, non-repetitive, and corrective | 6. INSPECTION PROCEDURES USED 7. INSPECTION FOCUS AREAS | ||
action was or is being taken, and the remaining | 87121 FE 1-6 | ||
criteria in the NRC Enforcement | SUPPLEMENTAL INSPECTION INFORMATION | ||
Policy, to exercise discretion, were satisfied. | 1. PROGRAM CODE(S) 2. PRIORITY 3. LICENSEE CONTACT 4. TELEPHONE NUMBER | ||
Non-cited | 03320 William Reeve - RSO (517) 531-8210 | ||
violation(s) | D Main Office Inspection Next Inspection Date: No Change | ||
were discussed | D Field Office Inspection | ||
involving | [{] Temporary Job Site Inspection Arauco Plant, West Four Mile Road, Grayling, MI | ||
the following | PROGRAM SCOPE | ||
requirement(s): | This was an unannounced field inspection of a large non-destructive testing company authorized to use radioactive | ||
During this inspection, certain of your activities, as described | material for industrial radiography at numerous field stations and at temporary jobsites throughout NRC jurisdiction. | ||
below and/or attached, were in violation | The scope of this inspection was limited to observations of radiographic testing on the premises of a particleboard | ||
of NRC requirements | manufacturing plant, currently under construction in Grayling, Michigan. | ||
and are being cited in accordance | PERFORMANCE OBSERVATIONS | ||
with NRC Enforcement | The inspector observed the conduct of radiographic operations by the licensee's crew at the plant construction site in | ||
Policy. This form is a NOTICE OF VIOLATION, which may be subject to posting in accordance | Grayling. The crew routinely worked overnight at the site to minimize the potential for exposure to members of the | ||
with 10CFR 19.11. (Violations | public, as the project was heavily staffed during the day. The inspector noted the satisfactory set-up and control of | ||
and Corrective | various restricted area boundaries during these operations, as supported by independent and confirmatory surveys. The | ||
Actions) Statement | inspector also noted adequate compliance with physical presence requirements for radiographic operations. Through | ||
of Corrective | interviews, the inspector found that the radiographer and his assistant were knowledgeable of radiation protection | ||
principles, licensee procedures and regulatory requirements, and that their dosimetry and survey instruments were | |||
by me to the Inspector | calibrated, operable, and properly utilized. The radiographic exposure device they utilized, a SPEC Model 150, was | ||
will be taken to correct the violations | likewise in good condition and properly labeled. | ||
identified. | While on the jobsite, the inspector reviewed the crew's shipping papers, utilization logs, and leak test documentation. | ||
This statement | No violations ofNRC requirements were identified as a result of this inspection. | ||
actions is made in accordance | |||
with the requirements | |||
of 10 CFR 2.201 (corrective | |||
steps already taken, corrective | |||
steps which will be taken, date when full compliance | |||
will be achieved). | |||
I understand | |||
that no further written response to NRC will be required, unless specifically | |||
requested. | |||
TITLE PRINTED NAME SIGNATURE | |||
REPRESENTATIVE | |||
NRC INSPECTOR | |||
Ryan Craffey BRANCH CHIEF Aaron Mccraw NRG FORM 591M PART 1 (07-2012) | |||
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY | |||
COMMISSION | |||
10 CFR 2.201 Docket File Information | |||
SAFETY INSPECTION | |||
REPORT AND COMPLIANCE | |||
INSPECTION | |||
1. LICENSEE/LOCATION | |||
INSPECTED: | |||
JAN X-Ray Services d/b/a JANX 8550 East Michigan A venue, Parma, MI 49269 Location Inspected: | |||
Job Site in Grayling, MI REPORT NUMBER(S) | |||
5. DATE(S) OF INSPECTION | |||
June 19, 2018 7. INSPECTION | |||
FOCUS AREAS FE 1-6 SUPPLEMENTAL | |||
INSPECTION | |||
INFORMATION | |||
1. PROGRAM CODE(S) | |||
3. LICENSEE CONTACT William Reeve -RSO | |||
Job Site Inspection | |||
Arauco Plant, West Four Mile Road, Grayling, MI PROGRAM SCOPE This was an unannounced | |||
field inspection | |||
of a large non-destructive | |||
testing company authorized | |||
to use radioactive | |||
material for industrial | |||
radiography | |||
at numerous field stations and at temporary | |||
jobsites throughout | |||
NRC jurisdiction. | |||
The scope of this inspection | |||
was limited to observations | |||
of radiographic | |||
testing on the premises of a particleboard | |||
manufacturing | |||
plant, currently | |||
under construction | |||
in Grayling, Michigan. | |||
PERFORMANCE | |||
OBSERVATIONS | |||
The inspector | |||
observed the conduct of radiographic | |||
operations | |||
by the licensee's | |||
crew at the plant construction | |||
site in Grayling. | |||
The crew routinely | |||
worked overnight | |||
at the site to minimize the potential | |||
for exposure to members of the public, as the project was heavily staffed during the day. The inspector | |||
noted the satisfactory | |||
set-up and control of various restricted | |||
area boundaries | |||
during these operations, as supported | |||
by independent | |||
and confirmatory | |||
surveys. The inspector | |||
also noted adequate compliance | |||
with physical presence requirements | |||
for radiographic | |||
operations. | |||
found that the radiographer | |||
and his assistant | |||
were knowledgeable | |||
of radiation | |||
protection | |||
principles, licensee procedures and regulatory | |||
requirements, and that their | |||
dosimetry | |||
and survey instruments | |||
The radiographic | |||
exposure device they utilized, a SPEC Model 150, was likewise in good condition | |||
and properly labeled. While on the jobsite, the inspector | |||
reviewed the crew's shipping papers, utilization | |||
logs, and leak test documentation. | |||
No violations | |||
ofNRC requirements | |||
were identified | |||
as a result of this inspection. | |||
NRG FORM 591M PART 3 (07-2012) | NRG FORM 591M PART 3 (07-2012) | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 21:17, 20 October 2019
ML18184A118 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | 03011772 |
Issue date: | 06/19/2018 |
From: | Ryan Craffey NRC/RGN-III |
To: | Reeve W JAN X-ray Services, JANX |
References | |
IR 2018001 | |
Download: ML18184A118 (2) | |
See also: IR 07200201/1980001
Text
NRC FORM 591M PART 1 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
(07-2012)
10CFR 2,201 SAFETY INSPECTION REPORT AND COMPLIANCE INSPECTION
1. LICENSEE/LOCATION INSPECTED: 2. NRG/REGIONAL OFFICE
JAN X-Ray Services d/b/a JANX Region III
8550 East Michigan A venue, Parma, MI 49269 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Location Inspected: Job Site in Grayling, MI 2443 Warrenville Road, Suite 210
Lisle, IL 60532-4352
REPORT NUMBER(S) 2018001
3. DOCKET NUMBER(S) 4. LICENSE NUMBER(S) 5. DATE(S) OF INSPECTION
030-11772 21-16560-01 June 19, 2018
LICENSEE:
The inspection was an examination of the activities conducted under your license as they relate to radiation safety and to compliance with the Nuclear
Regulatory Commission (NRC) rules and regulations and the conditions of your license. The inspection consisted of selective examinations of
procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observations by the inspector. The inspection findings are as follows:
[Z] 1. Based on the inspection findings, no violations were identified.
D 2. Previous violation(s) closed.
D 3. The violations(s), specifically described to you by the inspector as non-cited violations, are not being cited because they were self-identified,
non-repetitive, and corrective action was or is being taken, and the remaining criteria in the NRC Enforcement Policy, to exercise
discretion, were satisfied.
Non-cited violation(s) were discussed involving the following requirement(s):
D 4. During this inspection, certain of your activities, as described below and/or attached, were in violation of NRC requirements and are being
cited in accordance with NRC Enforcement Policy. This form is a NOTICE OF VIOLATION, which may be subject to posting in accordance
with 10CFR 19.11.
(Violations and Corrective Actions)
Statement of Corrective Actions
I hereby state that, within 30 days, the actions described by me to the Inspector will be taken to correct the violations identified. This statement of
corrective actions is made in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 2.201 (corrective steps already taken, corrective steps which will be taken,
date when full compliance will be achieved). I understand that no further written response to NRC will be required, unless specifically requested.
TITLE PRINTED NAME SIGNATURE DATE
LICENSEE'S
REPRESENTATIVE
NRC INSPECTOR Ryan Craffey 06/26/2018
BRANCH CHIEF Aaron Mccraw 06/29/2018
NRG FORM 591M PART 1 (07-2012)
NRC FORM 591M PART 3 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
(07-2012)
10 CFR 2.201 Docket File Information
SAFETY INSPECTION REPORT AND COMPLIANCE INSPECTION
1. LICENSEE/LOCATION INSPECTED: 2. NRG/REGIONAL OFFICE
JAN X-Ray Services d/b/a JANX Region III
8550 East Michigan A venue, Parma, MI 49269 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Location Inspected: Job Site in Grayling, MI 2443 Warrenville Road, Suite 210
Lisle, IL 60532-4352
REPORT NUMBER(S) 2018001
3. DOCKET NUMBER(S) 4. LICENSE NUMBER(S) 5. DATE(S) OF INSPECTION
030-11772 21-16560-01 June 19, 2018
6. INSPECTION PROCEDURES USED 7. INSPECTION FOCUS AREAS
87121 FE 1-6
SUPPLEMENTAL INSPECTION INFORMATION
1. PROGRAM CODE(S) 2. PRIORITY 3. LICENSEE CONTACT 4. TELEPHONE NUMBER
03320 William Reeve - RSO (517) 531-8210
D Main Office Inspection Next Inspection Date: No Change
D Field Office Inspection
[{] Temporary Job Site Inspection Arauco Plant, West Four Mile Road, Grayling, MI
PROGRAM SCOPE
This was an unannounced field inspection of a large non-destructive testing company authorized to use radioactive
material for industrial radiography at numerous field stations and at temporary jobsites throughout NRC jurisdiction.
The scope of this inspection was limited to observations of radiographic testing on the premises of a particleboard
manufacturing plant, currently under construction in Grayling, Michigan.
PERFORMANCE OBSERVATIONS
The inspector observed the conduct of radiographic operations by the licensee's crew at the plant construction site in
Grayling. The crew routinely worked overnight at the site to minimize the potential for exposure to members of the
public, as the project was heavily staffed during the day. The inspector noted the satisfactory set-up and control of
various restricted area boundaries during these operations, as supported by independent and confirmatory surveys. The
inspector also noted adequate compliance with physical presence requirements for radiographic operations. Through
interviews, the inspector found that the radiographer and his assistant were knowledgeable of radiation protection
principles, licensee procedures and regulatory requirements, and that their dosimetry and survey instruments were
calibrated, operable, and properly utilized. The radiographic exposure device they utilized, a SPEC Model 150, was
likewise in good condition and properly labeled.
While on the jobsite, the inspector reviewed the crew's shipping papers, utilization logs, and leak test documentation.
No violations ofNRC requirements were identified as a result of this inspection.
NRG FORM 591M PART 3 (07-2012)