ML18184A118: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:NRC FORM 591M PART 1 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY  
{{#Wiki_filter:NRC FORM 591M PART 1                                                                                         U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
COMMISSION  
(07-2012)
(07-2012)  
10CFR 2,201                 SAFETY INSPECTION REPORT AND COMPLIANCE INSPECTION
10CFR 2 , 201 SAFETY INSPECTION  
1. LICENSEE/LOCATION INSPECTED:                                                       2. NRG/REGIONAL OFFICE
REPORT AND COMPLIANCE  
JAN X-Ray Services d/b/a JANX                                                           Region III
INSPECTION  
8550 East Michigan A venue, Parma, MI 49269                                             U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
1. LICENSEE/LOCATION  
Location Inspected: Job Site in Grayling, MI                                           2443 Warrenville Road, Suite 210
INSPECTED:  
                                                                                        Lisle, IL 60532-4352
JAN X-Ray Services d/b/a JANX 8550 East Michigan A venue, Parma, MI 49269 Location Inspected:  
REPORT NUMBER(S)          2018001
Job Site in Grayling, MI REPORT NUMBER(S)
3. DOCKET NUMBER(S)                                                 4. LICENSE NUMBER(S)                               5. DATE(S) OF INSPECTION
2018001 2. NRG/REGIONAL
030-11772                                                         21-16560-01                                         June 19, 2018
OFFICE Region III U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
LICENSEE:
Commission
The inspection was an examination of the activities conducted under your license as they relate to radiation safety and to compliance with the Nuclear
2443 Warrenville  
Regulatory Commission (NRC) rules and regulations and the conditions of your license. The inspection consisted of selective examinations of
Road, Suite 210 Lisle, IL 60532-4352  
procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observations by the inspector. The inspection findings are as follows:
3. DOCKET NUMBER(S)  
  [Z]   1.     Based on the inspection findings, no violations were identified.
4. LICENSE NUMBER(S)  
  D    2.    Previous violation(s) closed.
5. DATE(S) OF INSPECTION  
  D    3.   The violations(s), specifically described to you by the inspector as non-cited violations, are not being cited because they were self-identified,
030-11772  
              non-repetitive, and corrective action was or is being taken, and the remaining criteria in the NRC Enforcement Policy, to exercise
21-16560-01  
              discretion, were satisfied.
June 19, 2018 LICENSEE:  
                            Non-cited violation(s) were discussed involving the following requirement(s):
The inspection  
  D    4.    During this inspection, certain of your activities, as described below and/or attached, were in violation of NRC requirements and are being
was an examination  
              cited in accordance with NRC Enforcement Policy. This form is a NOTICE OF VIOLATION, which may be subject to posting in accordance
of the activities  
              with 10CFR 19.11.
conducted  
              (Violations and Corrective Actions)
under your license as they relate to radiation  
                                                              Statement of Corrective Actions
safety and to compliance  
I hereby state that, within 30 days, the actions described by me to the Inspector will be taken to correct the violations identified. This statement of
with the Nuclear Regulatory  
corrective actions is made in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 2.201 (corrective steps already taken, corrective steps which will be taken,
Commission (NRC) rules and regulations  
date when full compliance will be achieved). I understand that no further written response to NRC will be required, unless specifically requested.
and the conditions  
          TITLE                               PRINTED NAME                                             SIGNATURE                                   DATE
of your license. The inspection  
LICENSEE'S
consisted  
REPRESENTATIVE
of selective  
NRC INSPECTOR           Ryan Craffey                                                                                                           06/26/2018
examinations  
BRANCH CHIEF             Aaron Mccraw                                                                                                           06/29/2018
of procedures  
NRG FORM 591M PART 1 (07-2012)
and representative  
 
records, interviews  
  NRC FORM 591M PART 3                                                                    U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
with personnel, and observations  
(07-2012)
by the inspector.  
10 CFR 2.201                                   Docket File Information
The inspection  
                      SAFETY INSPECTION REPORT AND COMPLIANCE INSPECTION
findings are as follows: [Z] 1. D 2. D 3. D 4. Based on the inspection  
1. LICENSEE/LOCATION INSPECTED:                                       2. NRG/REGIONAL OFFICE
findings, no violations  
  JAN X-Ray Services d/b/a JANX                                         Region III
were identified.  
  8550 East Michigan A venue, Parma, MI 49269                           U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Previous violation(s)  
  Location Inspected: Job Site in Grayling, MI                           2443 Warrenville Road, Suite 210
closed. The violations(s), specifically  
                                                                        Lisle, IL 60532-4352
described  
  REPORT NUMBER(S)       2018001
to you by the inspector  
3. DOCKET NUMBER(S)                               4. LICENSE NUMBER(S)                         5. DATE(S) OF INSPECTION
as non-cited  
030-11772                                        21-16560-01                                  June 19, 2018
violations, are not being cited because they were self-identified, non-repetitive, and corrective  
6. INSPECTION PROCEDURES USED                      7. INSPECTION FOCUS AREAS
action was or is being taken, and the remaining  
87121                                              FE 1-6
criteria in the NRC Enforcement  
                                          SUPPLEMENTAL INSPECTION INFORMATION
Policy, to exercise discretion, were satisfied.  
1. PROGRAM CODE(S)           2. PRIORITY         3. LICENSEE CONTACT                         4. TELEPHONE NUMBER
Non-cited  
03320                                              William Reeve - RSO                                   (517) 531-8210
violation(s)  
    D      Main Office Inspection                  Next Inspection Date:              No Change
were discussed  
    D      Field Office Inspection
involving  
    [{] Temporary Job Site Inspection Arauco Plant, West Four Mile Road, Grayling, MI
the following  
                                                      PROGRAM SCOPE
requirement(s):  
  This was an unannounced field inspection of a large non-destructive testing company authorized to use radioactive
During this inspection, certain of your activities, as described  
  material for industrial radiography at numerous field stations and at temporary jobsites throughout NRC jurisdiction.
below and/or attached, were in violation  
  The scope of this inspection was limited to observations of radiographic testing on the premises of a particleboard
of NRC requirements  
  manufacturing plant, currently under construction in Grayling, Michigan.
and are being cited in accordance  
  PERFORMANCE OBSERVATIONS
with NRC Enforcement  
  The inspector observed the conduct of radiographic operations by the licensee's crew at the plant construction site in
Policy. This form is a NOTICE OF VIOLATION, which may be subject to posting in accordance  
  Grayling. The crew routinely worked overnight at the site to minimize the potential for exposure to members of the
with 10CFR 19.11. (Violations  
  public, as the project was heavily staffed during the day. The inspector noted the satisfactory set-up and control of
and Corrective  
  various restricted area boundaries during these operations, as supported by independent and confirmatory surveys. The
Actions) Statement  
  inspector also noted adequate compliance with physical presence requirements for radiographic operations. Through
of Corrective  
  interviews, the inspector found that the radiographer and his assistant were knowledgeable of radiation protection
Actions I hereby state that, within 30 days, the actions described  
  principles, licensee procedures and regulatory requirements, and that their dosimetry and survey instruments were
by me to the Inspector  
  calibrated, operable, and properly utilized. The radiographic exposure device they utilized, a SPEC Model 150, was
will be taken to correct the violations  
  likewise in good condition and properly labeled.
identified.  
  While on the jobsite, the inspector reviewed the crew's shipping papers, utilization logs, and leak test documentation.
This statement  
  No violations ofNRC requirements were identified as a result of this inspection.
of corrective  
actions is made in accordance  
with the requirements  
of 10 CFR 2.201 (corrective  
steps already taken, corrective  
steps which will be taken, date when full compliance  
will be achieved).  
I understand  
that no further written response to NRC will be required, unless specifically  
requested.  
TITLE PRINTED NAME SIGNATURE  
DATE LICENSEE'S  
REPRESENTATIVE  
NRC INSPECTOR  
Ryan Craffey BRANCH CHIEF Aaron Mccraw NRG FORM 591M PART 1 (07-2012)  
06/26/2018
06/29/2018  
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY  
COMMISSION  
NRC FORM 591M PART 3 (07-2012)  
10 CFR 2.201 Docket File Information  
SAFETY INSPECTION  
REPORT AND COMPLIANCE  
INSPECTION  
1. LICENSEE/LOCATION  
INSPECTED:  
JAN X-Ray Services d/b/a JANX 8550 East Michigan A venue, Parma, MI 49269 Location Inspected:  
Job Site in Grayling, MI REPORT NUMBER(S)  
2018001 3. DOCKET NUMBER(S)  
030-11772
6. INSPECTION
PROCEDURES
USED 87121 2. NRG/REGIONAL
OFFICE 4. LICENSE NUMBER(S)  
21-16560-01
Region III U. S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission
2443 Warrenville
Road, Suite 210 Lisle, IL 60532-4352
5. DATE(S) OF INSPECTION  
June 19, 2018 7. INSPECTION  
FOCUS AREAS FE 1-6 SUPPLEMENTAL  
INSPECTION  
INFORMATION  
1. PROGRAM CODE(S) 03320 2. PRIORITY D Main Office Inspection
D Field Office Inspection
3. LICENSEE CONTACT William Reeve -RSO Next Inspection
Date: 4. TELEPHONE
NUMBER (517) 531-8210 No Change [{] Temporary  
Job Site Inspection  
Arauco Plant, West Four Mile Road, Grayling, MI PROGRAM SCOPE This was an unannounced  
field inspection  
of a large non-destructive  
testing company authorized  
to use radioactive  
material for industrial  
radiography  
at numerous field stations and at temporary  
jobsites throughout  
NRC jurisdiction.  
The scope of this inspection  
was limited to observations  
of radiographic  
testing on the premises of a particleboard  
manufacturing  
plant, currently  
under construction  
in Grayling, Michigan.  
PERFORMANCE  
OBSERVATIONS  
The inspector  
observed the conduct of radiographic  
operations  
by the licensee's  
crew at the plant construction  
site in Grayling.  
The crew routinely  
worked overnight  
at the site to minimize the potential  
for exposure to members of the public, as the project was heavily staffed during the day. The inspector  
noted the satisfactory  
set-up and control of various restricted  
area boundaries  
during these operations, as supported  
by independent  
and confirmatory  
surveys. The inspector  
also noted adequate compliance  
with physical presence requirements  
for radiographic  
operations.  
Through interviews, the inspector  
found that the radiographer  
and his assistant  
were knowledgeable  
of radiation  
protection  
principles, licensee procedures and regulatory  
requirements, and that their  
dosimetry  
and survey instruments  
were calibrated, operable, and properly utilized.  
The radiographic  
exposure device they utilized, a SPEC Model 150, was likewise in good condition  
and properly labeled. While on the jobsite, the inspector  
reviewed the crew's shipping papers, utilization  
logs, and leak test documentation.  
No violations  
ofNRC requirements  
were identified  
as a result of this inspection.  
NRG FORM 591M PART 3 (07-2012)
NRG FORM 591M PART 3 (07-2012)
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 21:17, 20 October 2019

Jan X-Ray Services D/B/A Janx - NRC Form 591 Part 1 & 3, Inspection Report 03011772/2018001 (DNMS)
ML18184A118
Person / Time
Site: 03011772
Issue date: 06/19/2018
From: Ryan Craffey
NRC/RGN-III
To: Reeve W
JAN X-ray Services, JANX
References
IR 2018001
Download: ML18184A118 (2)


See also: IR 07200201/1980001

Text

NRC FORM 591M PART 1 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

(07-2012)

10CFR 2,201 SAFETY INSPECTION REPORT AND COMPLIANCE INSPECTION

1. LICENSEE/LOCATION INSPECTED: 2. NRG/REGIONAL OFFICE

JAN X-Ray Services d/b/a JANX Region III

8550 East Michigan A venue, Parma, MI 49269 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Location Inspected: Job Site in Grayling, MI 2443 Warrenville Road, Suite 210

Lisle, IL 60532-4352

REPORT NUMBER(S) 2018001

3. DOCKET NUMBER(S) 4. LICENSE NUMBER(S) 5. DATE(S) OF INSPECTION

030-11772 21-16560-01 June 19, 2018

LICENSEE:

The inspection was an examination of the activities conducted under your license as they relate to radiation safety and to compliance with the Nuclear

Regulatory Commission (NRC) rules and regulations and the conditions of your license. The inspection consisted of selective examinations of

procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observations by the inspector. The inspection findings are as follows:

[Z] 1. Based on the inspection findings, no violations were identified.

D 2. Previous violation(s) closed.

D 3. The violations(s), specifically described to you by the inspector as non-cited violations, are not being cited because they were self-identified,

non-repetitive, and corrective action was or is being taken, and the remaining criteria in the NRC Enforcement Policy, to exercise

discretion, were satisfied.

Non-cited violation(s) were discussed involving the following requirement(s):

D 4. During this inspection, certain of your activities, as described below and/or attached, were in violation of NRC requirements and are being

cited in accordance with NRC Enforcement Policy. This form is a NOTICE OF VIOLATION, which may be subject to posting in accordance

with 10CFR 19.11.

(Violations and Corrective Actions)

Statement of Corrective Actions

I hereby state that, within 30 days, the actions described by me to the Inspector will be taken to correct the violations identified. This statement of

corrective actions is made in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 2.201 (corrective steps already taken, corrective steps which will be taken,

date when full compliance will be achieved). I understand that no further written response to NRC will be required, unless specifically requested.

TITLE PRINTED NAME SIGNATURE DATE

LICENSEE'S

REPRESENTATIVE

NRC INSPECTOR Ryan Craffey 06/26/2018

BRANCH CHIEF Aaron Mccraw 06/29/2018

NRG FORM 591M PART 1 (07-2012)

NRC FORM 591M PART 3 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

(07-2012)

10 CFR 2.201 Docket File Information

SAFETY INSPECTION REPORT AND COMPLIANCE INSPECTION

1. LICENSEE/LOCATION INSPECTED: 2. NRG/REGIONAL OFFICE

JAN X-Ray Services d/b/a JANX Region III

8550 East Michigan A venue, Parma, MI 49269 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Location Inspected: Job Site in Grayling, MI 2443 Warrenville Road, Suite 210

Lisle, IL 60532-4352

REPORT NUMBER(S) 2018001

3. DOCKET NUMBER(S) 4. LICENSE NUMBER(S) 5. DATE(S) OF INSPECTION

030-11772 21-16560-01 June 19, 2018

6. INSPECTION PROCEDURES USED 7. INSPECTION FOCUS AREAS

87121 FE 1-6

SUPPLEMENTAL INSPECTION INFORMATION

1. PROGRAM CODE(S) 2. PRIORITY 3. LICENSEE CONTACT 4. TELEPHONE NUMBER

03320 William Reeve - RSO (517) 531-8210

D Main Office Inspection Next Inspection Date: No Change

D Field Office Inspection

[{] Temporary Job Site Inspection Arauco Plant, West Four Mile Road, Grayling, MI

PROGRAM SCOPE

This was an unannounced field inspection of a large non-destructive testing company authorized to use radioactive

material for industrial radiography at numerous field stations and at temporary jobsites throughout NRC jurisdiction.

The scope of this inspection was limited to observations of radiographic testing on the premises of a particleboard

manufacturing plant, currently under construction in Grayling, Michigan.

PERFORMANCE OBSERVATIONS

The inspector observed the conduct of radiographic operations by the licensee's crew at the plant construction site in

Grayling. The crew routinely worked overnight at the site to minimize the potential for exposure to members of the

public, as the project was heavily staffed during the day. The inspector noted the satisfactory set-up and control of

various restricted area boundaries during these operations, as supported by independent and confirmatory surveys. The

inspector also noted adequate compliance with physical presence requirements for radiographic operations. Through

interviews, the inspector found that the radiographer and his assistant were knowledgeable of radiation protection

principles, licensee procedures and regulatory requirements, and that their dosimetry and survey instruments were

calibrated, operable, and properly utilized. The radiographic exposure device they utilized, a SPEC Model 150, was

likewise in good condition and properly labeled.

While on the jobsite, the inspector reviewed the crew's shipping papers, utilization logs, and leak test documentation.

No violations ofNRC requirements were identified as a result of this inspection.

NRG FORM 591M PART 3 (07-2012)