ML19093A891: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) Created page by program invented by StriderTol |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) Created page by program invented by StriderTol |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:}} | {{#Wiki_filter:Operability Initiative Public Meeting NRC Staff Feedback Related To NEI 2/15/19 Presentation Jane Marshall Deputy Director, Division of Safety Systems Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation April 3, 2019 | ||
Purpose & Agenda | |||
* Provide feedback on the topics presented by NEI during the Feb 15 public meeting related to ASME Code & Operability | |||
* Agenda | |||
- 12:00 - 12:15 Opening Comments/Intros | |||
- 12:15 - 02:00 NRC Presentation | |||
- 02:00 - 02:30 NRC/Industry Discussion | |||
- 02:30 - 02:45 Stakeholder Participation | |||
- 02:45 - 03:00 Actions Documented/Closing Remarks | |||
Determination Of Operability Is Separate From Code Compliance | |||
* Difference between Specified Safety Function (SSF) definitions used in draft NEI 18-03 and NRC Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 0326 leads to differing views | |||
* NEI 18-03 does not include structural integrity as part of the SSF definition | |||
* NRC Generic Letter (GL) 90-05 governs, therefore operational leakage and structural integrity issues apply to Operability, regardless of how discovered | |||
Use Of Any Technically Acceptable Method | |||
* Staff needs clarification regarding any technically acceptable method | |||
* NRC is not clear that any technically acceptable method is applicable in all cases (Section XI) | |||
* NRC suggesting a tabletop discussion using complex examples to achieve mutual understanding | |||
* Seeking input from NRC Office of General Counsel (OGC) to ensure clear understanding of past and current regulatory positions | |||
NRC Approval Of Alternate Methods Used | |||
* NRC position directly related to previous slide | |||
* Seeking input from OGC to ensure clear understanding of past and current regulatory positions | |||
Restoration Of Compliance | |||
* Staff agrees that restoration of compliance falls within the Corrective Action Program (CAP) | |||
- Regarding time requirements, licensees should plan and implement according to risk significance and ensure the requirements of IWA-4160 are met before returning systems to service that are not compliant with Section XI requirements. | |||
Principles Were Used In The Following Sections: | |||
* A.5 Piping and Piping Support Requirements | |||
* A.6 Structural Requirements | |||
* A.7 Technical Specification Operability vs. | |||
ASME OM Code Criteria | |||
* A.10 Flaw Evaluation | |||
A.5 - Piping & Piping Support | |||
* Staff agrees that the Operability Determination (OD) process is the licensees responsibility | |||
* Inspector will utilize IMC 0326, Section C.11 | |||
* Changes to IMC 0326 Section C.11 to incorporate updated guidance | |||
* Inspectors will continue to review the completeness and appropriateness of licensee operability determinations | |||
A.6 - Structural Requirements | |||
* Staff agrees that the OD process is the licensees responsibility | |||
* Staff reiterates that NRC is always speaking to the IMC 0326 definition of SSF | |||
* Licensees are expected to document and justify, consistent with any regulatory requirements, any standard or any value that deviates from the Current Licensing Basis (CLB) | |||
A.7 - TS Operability vs. OM Code | |||
* Staff disagrees with industrys position taken because Technical Specification (TS) incorporate In-Service Testing (IST) requirements | |||
* TS have Surveillance Requirements (SR) and criteria that state that a licensee must comply with the IST program specifications | |||
* The requirements of OM Code Sections ISTB-6200 and ISTC-5153 are to be followed for IST failures | |||
A.10 - Flaw Evaluation | |||
* Staff agrees that Operability SHALL be assessed when American Society Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Class 1, 2, or 3 components do not meet ASME or construction Code acceptance standards (this includes wall thinning) | |||
* Staff agrees that operational leakage in ASME Class 1, 2, or 3 components are a deficient/non-conforming condition and that Reactor Coolant System (RCS) leakage is covered by TS | |||
Future Endeavors | |||
* Future Engagement | |||
- Public call to occur following input from OGC to ensure clear understanding of past and current regulatory positions | |||
- Tabletop exercises using complex examples provided by both industry and NRC staff (May timeframe at NRC HQ) | |||
- Public meeting to discuss open items/deltas and respective documents (June timeframe - Location TBD) | |||
* Staff preparing revisions to IMC 0326 | |||
- Final draft revision prepared - Sept 2019 | |||
- Staff to schedule public meeting to solicit external stakeholder feedback | |||
- Final revision issued - Oct 2019 | |||
Discussion | |||
* Clarification questions from industry? | |||
* Comments from industry? | |||
* Open Discussion | |||
* Action items, if any, documented}} | |||
Revision as of 22:03, 19 October 2019
| ML19093A891 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 04/03/2019 |
| From: | John Marshall Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Wilkins L, NRR/DLP, 415-1377 | |
| References | |
| Download: ML19093A891 (13) | |
Text
Operability Initiative Public Meeting NRC Staff Feedback Related To NEI 2/15/19 Presentation Jane Marshall Deputy Director, Division of Safety Systems Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation April 3, 2019
Purpose & Agenda
- Provide feedback on the topics presented by NEI during the Feb 15 public meeting related to ASME Code & Operability
- Agenda
- 12:00 - 12:15 Opening Comments/Intros
- 12:15 - 02:00 NRC Presentation
- 02:00 - 02:30 NRC/Industry Discussion
- 02:30 - 02:45 Stakeholder Participation
- 02:45 - 03:00 Actions Documented/Closing Remarks
Determination Of Operability Is Separate From Code Compliance
- Difference between Specified Safety Function (SSF) definitions used in draft NEI 18-03 and NRC Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 0326 leads to differing views
- NEI 18-03 does not include structural integrity as part of the SSF definition
- NRC Generic Letter (GL) 90-05 governs, therefore operational leakage and structural integrity issues apply to Operability, regardless of how discovered
Use Of Any Technically Acceptable Method
- Staff needs clarification regarding any technically acceptable method
- NRC is not clear that any technically acceptable method is applicable in all cases (Section XI)
- NRC suggesting a tabletop discussion using complex examples to achieve mutual understanding
- Seeking input from NRC Office of General Counsel (OGC) to ensure clear understanding of past and current regulatory positions
NRC Approval Of Alternate Methods Used
- NRC position directly related to previous slide
- Seeking input from OGC to ensure clear understanding of past and current regulatory positions
Restoration Of Compliance
- Staff agrees that restoration of compliance falls within the Corrective Action Program (CAP)
- Regarding time requirements, licensees should plan and implement according to risk significance and ensure the requirements of IWA-4160 are met before returning systems to service that are not compliant with Section XI requirements.
Principles Were Used In The Following Sections:
- A.5 Piping and Piping Support Requirements
- A.6 Structural Requirements
- A.7 Technical Specification Operability vs.
- A.10 Flaw Evaluation
A.5 - Piping & Piping Support
- Staff agrees that the Operability Determination (OD) process is the licensees responsibility
- Inspector will utilize IMC 0326, Section C.11
- Changes to IMC 0326 Section C.11 to incorporate updated guidance
- Inspectors will continue to review the completeness and appropriateness of licensee operability determinations
A.6 - Structural Requirements
- Staff agrees that the OD process is the licensees responsibility
- Staff reiterates that NRC is always speaking to the IMC 0326 definition of SSF
- Licensees are expected to document and justify, consistent with any regulatory requirements, any standard or any value that deviates from the Current Licensing Basis (CLB)
A.7 - TS Operability vs. OM Code
- Staff disagrees with industrys position taken because Technical Specification (TS) incorporate In-Service Testing (IST) requirements
- TS have Surveillance Requirements (SR) and criteria that state that a licensee must comply with the IST program specifications
A.10 - Flaw Evaluation
- Staff agrees that Operability SHALL be assessed when American Society Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Class 1, 2, or 3 components do not meet ASME or construction Code acceptance standards (this includes wall thinning)
- Staff agrees that operational leakage in ASME Class 1, 2, or 3 components are a deficient/non-conforming condition and that Reactor Coolant System (RCS) leakage is covered by TS
Future Endeavors
- Future Engagement
- Public call to occur following input from OGC to ensure clear understanding of past and current regulatory positions
- Tabletop exercises using complex examples provided by both industry and NRC staff (May timeframe at NRC HQ)
- Public meeting to discuss open items/deltas and respective documents (June timeframe - Location TBD)
- Staff preparing revisions to IMC 0326
- Final draft revision prepared - Sept 2019
- Staff to schedule public meeting to solicit external stakeholder feedback
- Final revision issued - Oct 2019
Discussion
- Clarification questions from industry?
- Comments from industry?
- Open Discussion
- Action items, if any, documented