ML12363A107

Yankee Rowe Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Decommissioning Study Plan

ML12363A107
Person / Time
Site:	Yankee Rowe
Issue date:	12/31/2012
From:	Knight Cost Engineering Services
To:	Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, Yankee Atomic Electric Co
Shared Package
ML123630169	List: ML12363A106 ML12363A107
References
BYR 2012-043
Download: ML12363A107 (24)

Text

Decommissioning Study of the Yankee Rowe Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Prepared for Yankee Atomic Power Company Knight Cost Engineering Services, LLC December, 2012 Knight Cost Engineering Services, LLC KCES 2012-900, Rev. 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION

............................................................................................

3 2.0

SUMMARY

...................................................................................

4 3.0 DECOMMISSIONING COST ESTIMATING METHODOLOGIES................7

4.0 ASSUMPTIONS

..............................................................................

8 5.0 SCHEDULES

...............................................................................

10 6.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT

................................................................

12 6.1 UTILITY STAFF .......................................................................................

12 6.2 DECOMMISSIONING GENERAL CONTRACTOR

............................................

12 6.3 SECURITY ................................................

.............................

13

7.0 REFERENCES

..............................................................................

14 APPENDIX A ......................................................................................

15 Page 2 of 15 Knight Cost Engineering Services, LLC KCES 2012-900, Rev. 0

1.0 INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study is to identify the costs associated with the decommissioning of the Yankee Rowe (YR) Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI). This estimate includes only the structures, systems and land within the NRC licensed area. The YR ISFSI is located in the South East portion of the former reactor site. The NAC-MPC fuel storage and transport canister system chosen by YR is licensed by the NRC for both storage and transportation.

There are 16 dry storage casks on the 50 by 180-foot, three-foot-thick concrete pad at the YR ISFSI. Fifteen of the casks contain the 533 spent fuel assemblies and one cask stores sections of the reactor vessel internals that are classified as Greater Than Class C (GTCC) waste. Each vertical concrete cask has a three and a half-inch steel liner surrounded by 21 inches of reinforced concrete.

The entire dry storage process -- procuring materials, fabricating the fuel containers, constructing the storage facility and transferring spent fuel was completed in June 2003.Page 3 of 15 Knight Cost Engineering Services, LLC KCES 2012-900, Rev. 0 2.0

SUMMARY

Decommissioning is the safe removal of a facility or site from service and the reduction of radioactivity to a level that permits either the release of the property for unrestricted use and NRC license termination; or a restricted release of the property and NRC license termination.

This estimate includes all costs incurred to release the property for unrestricted use.On June 17, 2011, the NRC published a final rule amending its regulations to improve decommissioning planning.

The rule will become effective on December 17, 2012 and requires compliance by March 31, 2013. This rule will require licensees to report additional details in their decommissioning cost estimate.

To assist in the implementation of the new rule, the NRC issued NUREG-1757, "Consolidated Decommissioning Guidance, Financial Assurance, Recordkeeping and Timeliness." NUREG-1 757 does not apply to licensees under I OCFR Part 50 nor does it eliminate the need to follow Regulatory Guide 1.202 or NUREG-1713.

It does provide additional information to support the development of the cost estimate.

This cost estimate was prepared in accordance with the guidelines provided in RG 1.202 and NUREG-1713.

In addition, it does take into account the guidelines identified in NUREG-1757.

NUREG-1757 specifies that a contingency of 25% is to be included in the estimate.

This estimate takes exception to this contingency level for two reasons. First, the estimate is conservative in that the entire storage pad, concrete overpacks and overpack liners are assumed to be disposed of as potentially contaminated.

Second, the YR site has recently been successfully decommissioned.

Many of the key personnel involved in that project remain at the YR ISFSI.The lessons learned from that project will be incorporated in the YR ISFSI decommissioning.

For this reason it is felt that a 10% contingency is adequate to cover unknown and unplanned occurrences.

The total cost including contingency is $9.8 million, $8.5 million for radiological removal and$1.3 million for non-radiological removal. Table 2-1 provides a summary of costs. Cost details are provided in Appendix A TABLE 2-1

SUMMARY

OF COSTS Non-Radiological radiological Total Cost Removal $ Removal $Grand Total Building $9,848,120

$8,510,833

$1,337,287 Tax on General Contractor

$0 $0 so General Contractor with contingency

$6,033,61.2 S5,214,301

$819,311 Page 4 of 15 Knight Cost Engineering Services, LLC KCES 2012-900, Rev. 0 Site Costs with contingency

$3,814,508

$3,296,532

$517,976 General. Contractor

$5,485,102

$4,740,274

$744,828 Site Costs $3,467,735

$2,996,847

$470,888 YR ISFSI S8,952,837

$7,737,121

$1,215,716 PERIOD DEPENDENT COSTS $5,814,531

$5,024,970

$789,562 1.1 YR Site Costs $3,467,735

$2,996,847

$470,888 1.1.1 Project Management

$1,222,720

1.1.2 Security

Staff $889,014 1.1.3 Fees $325,000 $280,868 $44,132 1.1.4 Insurance

$631,000 $545,316 $85,684 1.1.5 Legal $200,000 $172,842 $27,158 I.1.6 Property Taxes $200,000 $172,842 $27,158 1.2 General Contractor

$2,346,796

$2,028,122

$318,674 1.2.1 Decommissioning General Contractor

$1,209,290

1.2.2 Waste

Packaging Crew $512,621 1.2.3 Equipment

& Materials

$624,885 ACTIVITIES

$3,138,305

$2,712,151

$426,154 1.3 Project Engineering

$21,108 $18,242 $2,866 1.3.1 Procedure Development and Review -Offsite $10,554 Preparation of QA and Safety Documents-

1.3.2 Offsite

(in parallel with 1.2.1) $10,554 Site Mobilization and General Employee 1.4 Training (GET) $106,669 $92,184 $14,485 1.4.1 Site Mobilization

$27,198 1.4.2 General Employee Training $71,738 1.4.3 Site Specific Training $7,733 1.5 Site Preparation

-Performed by Staff $14,404 $12,448 $1,956 1.5.1 Initial Site Survey 1.5.2 Setup work areas 1.5.3 Decontamination Readiness Review 1.6 Disconnect all utilities to work areas. $7,202 $6,224 $978 1.6.1 Electrical

$3,601 1.6.2 Ventilation

$1,800 1.6.3 Piping $1,800 1.7 Removal inside security fence $2,596,684

$2,535,505

$61,179 1.7.1 Remove Guard Posts $3,305 $3,305 1.7.2 Instrument Enclosure

$8,375 $0 $8,375 1.7.3 Remove VCCs $1,208,823

$1,208,823

$0 1.7.3.1 Exterior Concrete $612,010 $0 $0 1.7.3.2 Steel liner $596,812 1.7.4 Remove Concrete Pad $1,326,683

$1,326,683

1.7.5 Remove

Fence and Towers $39,399 $39,399 1.7.6 Remove Light Towers $10,100 $10,100 1.8 Removal outside security fence $334,315 $334,315 Page 5 of 15 Knight Cost Engineering Services, LLC KCES 2012-900, Rev. 0 1.8.1 Remove Nuisance Fence $70,485 $70.485 1.8.2 Retaining Wall $46,334 $46,334 Conduit and wire -Instrument Enclosure to 1.8.3 Utility Pole $23,208 $23,208 1.8.4 Remove road inside licensed area $190,915 $190,915 1.8.5 Remove vehicle barriers $3,373 $3,373 1.8.10 Miscellaneous Final Site Survey Structure gone -By DGC 1.9 Staff $25,000 $21,605 $3,395 1.9.1 Prepare Final Status Survey Plan 1.9.2 Soil Sampling I *9.3 Direct Survey 1.9.4 Sampling Analysis 1.9.5 Prepare Final Status Survey Report 1.1 Orise Site Release Confirmation 1.11 Outside areas $2,904 $2,904 1.11.1 Backfill, grade and seed $2,904 $2,904 1.12 Demolition Crew Demobilization

$19,465 $16,822 $2,643 1.13 Final Project Report -Offsite $10,554 $9,121 $1,433 Page 6 of 15 Knight Cost Engineering Services, LLC KCES 2012-900, Rev. 0 3.0 DECOMMISSIONING COST ESTIMATING APPROACH Two types of costs were determined in this estimate:

activity costs and level of effort costs. The activity costs were developed utilizing a unit cost factor approach.

Site material quantities for concrete, steel and equipment where developed from site specific drawings.

Productivity factors were applied to these quantities to determine activity durations.

Labor crews were developed and applied to the material quantities to determine labor costs and person-hours.

The activity durations were used to develop a project schedule.The level of effort costs such as equipment rental and the General Contractor (GC) staff were developed based on the project schedule duration.

A rental equipment file was developed for the construction effort. The GC staff is assumed to be on-site for the duration of the project. The Oversight staff cost is another level of effort cost that is included in the cost estimate.Bulk removal of the storage pad and concrete storage casks is assumed to be performed using an excavator with a hydraulic hammer attachment.

The steel liner will be segmented utilizing torch cutters. All of this waste will be trucked off-site for processing.

This leads to a large disposal volume; however, at a lower rate for bulk processing than for direct burial. In addition, there will be far less characterization and iterative decontamination.

Clean structures will be demolished using mechanical means and disposed of at a local landfill.In addition to the removal labor there is a dedicated waste packaging crew included in this estimate.

This crew will consolidate, package and prepare containers for transportation.

The waste packaging is estimated to remain on site for the duration of the project. This crew consists of 2 laborers; I Health Physics Technician; 1 Equipment Operator and 1 Foreman.Page 7 of 15 Knight Cost Engineering Services, LLC KCES 2012-900, Rev. 0 4.0 ASSUMPTIONS Following is a list of assumptions developed by KCES in completing this study. These assumptions are based on the most current decommissioning methodologies and site-specific considerations.

1. Component quantities were developed from actual plant listings.2. Concrete volumes were developed from plant drawings.3. The oversight staff is assumed to be the similar size and configuration as it is currently.

4. The oversight staff positions and costs were supplied by the Company and represent July, 2012 salary and benefit data.5. Subcontractor base labor rates and fringe benefits were taken directly from the 2012 R. S. Means Heavy Construction Cost Data and adjusted to Massachusetts based on the City Cost Indexes for Pittsfield, MA.6. Activity labor costs do not include any allowance for delays between activities, nor is there any cost allowance for craft labor retained on-site while waiting for work to become available.

7. All skilled laborers will be supplied locally and hired by the Decommissioning General Contractor (DGC).8. The cost for Utility personnel assisting the DGC to develop decommissioning activity specifications is included in the Utility Staff costs.9. The separate DGC staff salaries, including overhead and profit, were determined by KCES.10. Transportation costs are based on actual mileage from YR to Memphis, TN processing facility utilized in the estimate.11. The ISFSI Concrete Pad, VCC exterior concrete and VCC liner steel are assumed to be Class A waste. This waste will be disposed of at the Studsvik processing facility in Tennessee.

A disposal rate of $0.1.3 per pound has been used in this estimate and is based on information provided by Studsvik.12. The following buildings are disposed of as Clean waste in local landfill.

A disposal rate of $91.80 per ton has been used in this estimate and is based on information provided in the 2012 R. S. Means Building Construction Cost Data.Guard Posts Instrument Enclosure Page 8 of 15 Knight Cost Engineering Services, LLC KCES 2012-900, Rev. 0 Security Fence Light Towers Nuisance Fence Retaining Wall Conduit and wire -Instrument Enclosure to Utility Pole Road inside licensed area Vehicle barrier 13. All costs used in these calculations were current on July, 2012.14. The costs of all required safety analyses and safety measures for the protection of the general public, the environment, and decommissioning workers are included in the cost estimates.

15. It is assumed that all MPCs containing both spent fuel and GTCC will have been removed from site prior to the start of decommissioning.

16. Property taxes are included in the estimate at the current cost of $200,000 per year.17. Fees are included in the estimate at the current cost of $325,000 per year.18. Insurance costs are included in the estimate at the current cost of $631,000 per year.19. Legal costs are included in the estimate at the current cost of $200,000 per year.20. The decommissioning will be performed under the current regulations.

21. Removal of the pad and concrete overpacks will be performed in Tyvek coveralls.

Productivity rates have been adjusted to account for this.22. No subsurface material is assumed to require remediation regarding radionuclides.

This assumption is justified because: 1) the ISFSI area was confirmed to be clean of radiological contaminants prior to the construction of the ISFSI; 2) the ISFSI area will be maintained clean of loose radiological contaminants during the storage period; 3) the irradiated fuel and GTCC waste are stored in sealed canisters;

4) nuclear activation of the VCCs, VCCs liners, and ISFSI pad are anticipated; the activation products will remain fixed during the storage period; and 5) if contamination of subsurface material occurs during decommissioning activities, the contamination is expected to remain below the decommissioning criteria of 25 millirem per year Total Effective Dose Equivalent.

Page 9 of 15 Knight Cost Engineering Services, LLC KCES 2012-900, Rev. 0 5.0 SCHEDULE A scenario-specific schedule has been developed for estimate.Activity durations were determined based on the unit cost factor approach.

Plant material inventory quantities were developed from site specific material.

Unit rates for cost, man hours and schedule hours were applied to the material quantities.

From this calculation the removal or decontamination cost, total man hours and total schedule hours were determined for an activity.The schedule hours are then entered into the schedule to determine project duration.

Two work crews are assumed for the concrete pad and concrete overpacks.

All other work was assumed to be performed by one crew. Work outside of the security fence will be performed in parallel with the work inside the fence. The total project duration is 6.96 months.Figure 5-1 provides the detailed decommissioning schedule.Page 10 of 15 Knight Cost Engineering Services, LLC KCES 2012-900, Rev. 0 Figure 5-1 Project Schedule ID iTask Name.Project EngIneering 3 i Procedure Development and Review -Offsite-4 Preparation of OA and Safety Documents

-offsita-6 1 --.............

l ... .... ..............5 ! Site Mobiiiation and General Eomployee Training (GET)-.616-i Site Mobilization 7 General Employee Training 6- 1 Site Specific Training 9 Site Preparation

-Performed by Staff.d Initial Site Survey 11 ' Setup work areas 12 Decontamination Readiness Review 13 Discennect ail utilities to work areas.-1"4 Electrical

.15 Ventilation 16 i Piping 17 Removal Iialda Soeuirty Fence 18 i Remove Guard Poots 19-" Remove Instrument 0 Remove VCCs Extletrir Concrete.Steel liner 23 Remove Concrete Padc 24 Remove Fence and Towers 25 Remove Light Towers 26 i Removal Ottilde Security Pence 27 Remove Nuisance Fence 2 8 Remove Retaining Wall 29 Remove Conduit and Wire 30 Remove road inside licensed area 3" Remove vehicle barrier 32 Final Site Sarvey Structure gone -By DGC Staff 33 Prepare Final Status Survey Plan 34 Soil Sampling..3 Direct Survey.36 Sampling Analysls 37 1 Prepare Final Status Survey Report 38 avse Site Release Confirmation-I Outidle areas 40 BacktItl, grade and seed 41--] Demoitilon Craw Oemobllioallon

.42 -"I Final Project Report -Offite.i Duration l Start...........

...... --' -i -5 days: Thu i2/14 5 days: Thu V,2114 9 danys Thu 1V9114 3 days Thu 119114 5 days Tue 1114(14 I day Tue t121114 4 days Wed 1122/14 2 days Wed 1/221i4 1 day Fri 1/24/14 1 day Mon 1V27114 2 days.. Tue 1128114 1 day Tue 1128114 0.5 days Wed 1/29/14 G.5 days Wed 1129114 90.13 days Thu 1130114 0.59 days: Thu 1130/14 1.24 days Thu 1130114 49.22 days Fri 1131114 12.55 days Fri 1131/14 3M.67 days Wed 2119Mt'27.21 days Fri 4111/14 9.41 days Tue 5120/14 2.46 days Mon 612/14 39.79 days Thu 1130114 17.21 days Thu 1130/14 5.14 days Mon 2124)14 6.44 days Mon 313114 10.33 days Tue 3111/14 0.67 days Wed 3126/14 23 days Thu G15/14 5 days T I hu 6/5/14 5 days Thu W-12/14 3 days Thu 6119/14 5 days Tue 6(24/14 5 days" Tue 7/1/14 0days" Toe 7/8/14, 5.93 days Tue 7/8114& 6.93 days ..T.ue a78114 2 days Wed 7116/14 10 days Fri 7/18/14: Finish i Dec Wed 118/14 Wed I1//14 Wad 11/114 1 Tue 1121/14 Mon 1/13/14 Mon 1120/14 'Tue 1121114 Mon 112714 Thu 1/23/14 Fri 1124/14 Mon 1/27/14 W"us 1128114 Tue 1/28/14, Wed 1/28/14 Wed 1129/14 1 The 615114 Thu 1/30114 FrP 1/31114 Fri 4/11114 1 Wed 2/19/14 Fo 4/11i/14 Tue 5120114 Mon 6/2/14 Thu 6/5114 Wed 3128114 Mon 2/24/14 Mon 3/3/14 Tue 3/11/14 Wed 3/26114 Wed 3/26/14 1 Tue 718114,1 Thu 6/I2/14 Tue 6/24/14 Tue 71/ 14 Tue 7'18/14Te714 Wed 7116114 i*Wed 71'16/U4 Fri 7/18/114 Fri 811114 1 1 st Quarter i2nd Quarter l 3rd Quarter.. u... ...... ....... .. ...... T ....... .. ... -,,J6 Aug.4 i;~.It.Liii F.. .. ...1.1 Page 11 of 15 Knight Cost Engineering Services, LLC KCES 2012-900, Rev. 0 6.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT There are three components to project management during decommissioning, Oversight Staff (staff), Decommissioning General Contractor Staff (DGC) and Security.

The person levels for each are identified below.6.1 OVERSIGHT STAFF The staff size is currently at a level of 18 and is assumed to be maintained at this level and at a similar configuration during the decommissioning.

In addition, one final status survey resource will be added and one licensing person will be added to assist in the decommissioning.

The staff will provide DGC oversight as well as maintain license compliance.

Table 7-1 provides a summary of this staff.TABLE 6-1 OVERSIGHT STAFF Staff Number President 1 Cask Relicensing Project Manager 1 Workers Concerns Manager 1.Business Manager I ISFSI Manager 2 ISFSI QA Manager 1 Director Government Relations 1 General iCounsel I Business Administrator I Treasurer I Accountant 1 Benefits Manager I IT Services I ISFSI Operations Specialist 2 Program Manager 1 ISFSI Administrator I Licensing Engineer 1 Security Manager 1 20 6.2 DECOMMISSIONING GENERAL CONTRACTOR The DGC will be responsible for all of the physical work. The staff will oversee the work crews., schedule work and supply HP support. The DGC will be responsible for finishing the project on time and on budget. Table 7-2 provides a summary of the DGC staff.Page 12 of 15 Knight Cost Engineering Services, LLC KCES 2012-900, Rev. 0 TABLE 6-2 DOC STAFF 2012 Person Base Position Salary Level Project Superintendent

$148,000 1.00 QA Auditor/Inspector

$70,000 1.00 Health & Safety Supervisor

$117,000 1.00 Packaging/Shipping Specialist

$70,000 1.00 Cost Control Accountant

$55,000 1.00 Scheduler II $60,000 1.00 Demolition Specialist

$86,000 1,00 Industrial Safety $86,000 1.00 Engineering Supervisor

$117,000 1.00 Project Supervisor

$79,000 1.00 Decontamination Tech $55,000 2.00 Instrumentation Tech $55,000 1.00 Tool Crib Attendant

$43,000 1.00 14.00 6.3 SECURITY Once spent fuel has been removed from the site the security force will be significantly reduced.This estimate assumes a force of 13 guards and one manager. This will allow a security person level of 5 guards during work time and two guards all other times. The guard force was assumed to consist of various levels of guards and the rate used has been adjusted accordingly.

Page 13 of 15 Knight Cost Engineering Services, LLC KCES 2012-900, Rev. 0 7.0 References

1. R.S. Means, Inc, Building Construction Cost Data, Kingston, Massachusetts, 2012.2. Regulatory Guide 1.202, "Standard Format and Content of Decommissioning Cost Estimates for Nuclear Power Reactors" 3. NUREG- 1713, "Standard Review Plan for Decommissioning Cost Estimates for Nuclear Power Reactors" 4. NUREG-1757, "Consolidated Decommissioning Guidance, Financial Assurance, Recordkeeping and Timeliness" Page. 14 of 15 Knight Cost Engineering Services, LLC KCES 2012-900, Rev. 0 APPENDIX A Page 15 of 15 lJ001,12010 400 3AA.0*0 W-.40 720 M ý 00 20

• 7i04000 4 12. 74.2Oa 204760 pl~o 4.0.VaM44 0<4".2 M02. 9I4,wO0 Ooo.441 Y .*00.W 4 7*004 0240020 2A.07.4 0.70 .14..4 411WOMAN2420 1103t.11 0200%00-W104060 4.o.001200.40atm so SO 2$W0.41 62*6000 20.14*12 S'A*,x R=Aad2 3 103W50 a.*otoa 11,11tW7 005120 Coot's a 00060 003004 00106.20 stiboo 01,123*2 so S0=2O0 02111.736 4620200 a.6120*7 20 1000*0 so w0 a ml..00102 04.7031 SMSSW2 2046170 04*0247 1020,1 6,04of l.1

• 2 10 6-1,010*0ww 00 2100 MI.202l 104 010 -I 000.0 ...0.dm2 4.190414 222000000%I01l-I WTI0.2.1 20.7.0 $314.0 1120110 56.0 1 M7 s0% '20,1 17200 001*t4 00.1 20.c 00.0 10,20.70 MAY0 In?7, '040% S32.016 tart I 0002 0IN.0 I =10% 12420.0 9,0114 0020~ t20007 t0.o020 atom tO20lO 1 wes 00o71 oo.n0, 02,20A t'20.21t SK.0 tU. 020.20 200,00 205,~ 1 HIM2 0IN0 0220 -RAT '051 0.00 14I.1 0SAY =A` 62% 062111K) 'M07 0 MAT "201 0`m.2% MAN02 Ifl I a I o, 007 022%mnn *7 02040 207 is oooo ar 6612 02, mos 01 0$a 00 0OT% 006*1 Ila. St 0I4O Mon. %,2` 4 A.m I0M20 I S0<22,m2 VWS*04 SIS.MA own.00 03."folad 40,604 020I 202% 07,"Is 2nd 1.14 O-o.oý072040-2 2.G0 006 seal 120100 022.20 204.00 #iM10.00 aO.2"20 SM20= MO2.62 14402-I-0 OW314 00116 1,200M &,MAO2 207.02 SM ON, 1072*20 20100 S1200.200, 00001 000 N- 1200000 W fthod".202 Po0.o40200a T-oo UMC.0020-.l 000 072 W00402000 P004200002 24.10 04. to1 tg040 260.12000146, 2714 Roo, CI20404.4 462760 0,I, 0400020'14027 ~ 0270 MAN20 s144*0 1.o.0" SM4,0 06070 wars MAN00 I004.I I'll.0 ;a13 0I 20 I 0n *2 0.20 976460 045.70 020.20 SUP" 0 00440 0000 0200 000.20% 174,12 0.0MI:0 SU0.2 0207 0202% %"Am0 06.117 W301.1 l2171 W02040 "a"o OI lo W0.4 000.70 I00m02 172= 0.2007$'.20034 14.11419 I-SOON*2 612m,4020674607 27,14 -?24 ý71-3 1 1 W000.2 MIT 0I% 600 0.I00A," Ulm+o Ivan mo'lO Iy SMA4 I m,7I Sm2.00 107,0 0MA00 002.7 010tAM U01917 ,.0400 W4.60$;.3 33£2 S 'IN0 STAN2 3403230 0033~-~'OOpmo.3oo.l.oo.J 3k~0030~04~.*04 403733290~ma~

03-3307-00 01 -I 3m, 03 -3.- -05 10 43 Will0`1V3 31#9 91359 0 a 1*07041 403 5lf$739 5332 WAN9 IWO4 m30" 5330320 1 M( w29 I 10309 134.1 1 u XMI 1"A 3 0160,50 WAN~I "As3 134.NO 910 0to s3m03 a23 I $2,M7 53.4 34,51230 3m003 330.4010 303 -4.. ýDow-.TIM39#40*2 Ii3ýVa a.", -10404235 W'dI 3.0 33 039 41s 13M3 O 3343 31901 03 03 .,3 3 0o 630 030 30t 21 023 2'3431 273 332 3 9 51 003M.014 --.02 33 MW10 21.7 "034 A4?w0 a3 u + +, yt o m ",i lllvoJ s a l;~l o m .1" 1l 42+.s+ sIOM4 sVM4.333 w..,sO.4oo.m,.323a..012 535323914534 52i 0314 7+07 0014 41*03 40 5. 004 320 030303$MM'Vil 3523 030m145 7#13~ 00 3o2 0733 0 3 244o 2.004 20 7032l 310 Ulm31 MM92 u4l3 03039 1303 00., 0 43.3 3 37003 330033314 3 332.s*0.,Ss.oa.

331*0*433033 3-3 73.1931070.3 3 53930m0309o53.3 3 0.14 040o3134532 0 050000 13 7153140032 090301403.333534 035.4 14533 .40 0395 342 00332103902 0425435 093 3 03m~w.03 3 3234s104s0.9, 3 #00303030~

30190*43100934 7 0964333 00103540 I 419390200 3 *300,..19302.1*m 2 0533330090*

33310505333037000 3 055320444.0433 2 lmsO. 0007 73433 0 35333 0 3190"loioo C- +m,, o0.0 M#90 I3ll04 'a. 84,14 00 404 45 Wl0l 3 4 $1444,2+'140M U.11m0990 SILO foaI 033 00 93323 D.W N703 03104 1449 539,53 t 00 33 Will 3,3 43.3..302 10 was053329321 1034- T9 50 esrdt W- VIA",

YOVMM RIa 66410 D Cost Fafr, DIMA6S 1,41 SWO 4dft o. aft 6.04.0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a 00 04 71.01 440 I 404 0t'.. *4 606 1.6 00..4foý 0*40. S-16. W464. 0. 74 20 0. 4.. 1 4 lW a 4i 0 0 6 0 .alS0.M0l OL.0 r., a- W.A.. D4.2140 lb.Y14LWO Xd40* YA404 Y.0*1 2.0*0*0 X00*1* *.1 C.4 CI Q. ii4 * .I00.Q A-ds00 *40 SWO 27 046040 4,4400 46096~d 4ll l"4 o 13AKU 7.90 4 4 046 ZI 04.60.4* 4.043761 I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n a*a~ 4 0 0200 093 .4 SMA106 U1=3212 l IA 17* IN0 1 VIM32 ntT'm'I S 004 7114*411.P4.44,.

1.0.1 0004 04. 441 I 4.063" 6 80.4 WAm WasP.404W

..VW -I 04041010a..*4 mmo mOmS O wm 70406..0ww I CW3*1 mm.4 SON i0m,*0*.I SWISS, 1 00 am WM',s6.d 4 On..k" No6 "m VAS, 4k 06404 Sin 0412w.00 sbo-dw 2 COW0S so4w SlIZ3 27 sla66ad 144l46666 163+0 .606 1466*14,40, 010.664 $10.40 $,A"6 0.4..0,M0.

140,.144 4.0404.0.00.

123 0.n404.4007.mn.6.4.o I) 10.14.1.041364..t...1*mn.

143 7*Il 666764 0436 ~44404a I I 7.166. 10.14 004.6.96 I am7 B B O am I Do 40M 166 I.N6 1.66 I Ia A.6 as 8.00 s 4m 24 oam 4 410 411 0 4.71 73 0 66 04 6.40041.66 1.4045so SO 01= PAW "4,41l"MI 53AM0$I-4 SIAM SIA $I"0.0 17.6 6 6 9. 6 6 7044 07406 477 a WS. Slnw S1S SAM so0 62wea 0 M I 0 0 2.1TI AO-.o 77.0 6.1 44.0014L-6 1441 0 4ft. 6 .mt 7067, sF4. Lb 66404* -.-N.666~U 066R 060 nom 0m "All9 IN66 2w4 1 .6 0,0 4,00 0404 01.., ~ ~ ~ ~ Sa 00=0076 0m 666 60N.76 6 4 ma a.0 I Vi1 t4026606.610306.1.0*

l~*0.o.,1s.,.4.c.614a~.*.

0 4?1 427.40 0,4t III." So 4 A O 71.41 01640. .Sa 714.4* 006 61 641644144, R0041 7 .14 3*4. *4. 4 .nf II 061.404.76 4.a.. S6.~ iA K196M US30 SA 1 .6 4 1264 0INS70 I144 0400 4.601, 411 1 2640 6.6444'm6 2 I'm6 14211 36 Um0 64.010 06.210 I SA0ID *6 174 6..n. 4146..1731 6.366m01,o.04.

-66406. 05 1 +4010*0n '-s Tr-tsO. 70M.-0 .$ Tml 0.. .640 ,6 .. , .0.., 073403 4.44 0 661 166 266s0 S,406 46.0a4 ON 404.0 066N low0 6.4666401~

~ 2614 74. W.7 66OSW64 a6064

• 706.0 4..1o~.4...1.

66 1403. , 136.066 Mw.66 16.0 '630 m 647.0 *4 96 10,451 foll1o1 64 40 S1i.l8 1.40+0 014010,4 9611r.0 66 064*14m 130 463 .44.o6011402...0.14*4

• 7.90.60ko440..1*n06I0.cc4.0 1.732 WU- Wsl to I W id ý ý Tlll s4 ok. I Im TW1L $N0 0m 0 420 son 640036 am 052.31~e 6"Mi $246"A U.l~.+ 70 .,.1 SSW .A 6e7 166 6I 6.96 4.140 2T.12 6 oo oo 0 .o 1.1fo1 o4 M6% +/-121 a, 0.4 I , I 1.11,032 2306" SO ST 4 9666S 66410A 0lm u = 1 426444 044231 MWA12 SO1W&A VA.4 R41.0ve 44 .7-M I .41 .0317 S316.6 S1.166.44 SO S`JM.W 61=463+ 600o 35 1"-1 S4MAO 040el3 m.6666% 0 6A4 4 .17316 4.00150A 6To-06% 667 113 MIN 20 76 ,4 Cbo.37 110 N N.100"~~*640 06*4460.wMIASm .Is A4IS 1. 7119 =7 430 44 6.44146666 11144.0..dI

• 4 4 wmO*4444.6t.1,6.4*00 0 14.0.o..M:$1.12M S 614 13 0341, MI 7400 (700 tol 02.04 0700.00 40, Ijod (.7. 1.00 A000~400.00 7.00 l...0060.6470

.000 0040 40. 0o. W~o Wa 4.0 Co~0 .00.. We W.0 o. e 00 0*000 71004000 Co.0 720.4020*1 704.* P.01.0, Maki- Qa4kof wifto.3,O Xd-6 X3OhM 0000.70 740O0.( 7600017 allamadd, 7*000 n. rd0 0. C0Q Vh (60s~ 714 ..0~h 0*1070 Fa,, a..* 700400. 1.00000. l0.0.0 ft 0*W-,. W0Pt0070.-0434.~ 0. -74. 00002 wal 7000020 00 M Radial 6.0. Lat--70, ..70001 ""W Ohs 0013 is 0.0..0,.oat Os. 40,. 7.O 00.00 0*In.a-. i*s70*Ohs 004400 10 407.0 W0040 46.an 0.0 4000.07 MAX)4 a00000 00 0.0 is4, 6 1, 000 00 10.04-ft-00000 ft 04 coos 012000 7o~0.m00.4 00 ,is., .4 0,10 F05 000f70 000 hsom*ONRA 00400. r." am000.4 3 0.00 00.?a- fi74 '0,*"?0 O00 Unit3 401.1407 'jade 0'A 0040 0034 am 0 00 i 1 In ,00 Ill. 1. 0 00 00 iSO 03 0o00 0 .M0 o41 103,41700"0 "0. Inlj 1121 03? 01200,o0 U00.60,04) amn d .m adn ?a.RLF 22MM 1. 0* 03e7 2IT12 NIm- M Z 1 WI 0110 1.2" _,O te. I ill SA 21112 RSt 31 " 3,ntt 30213 2M 1,mN im a sld in da amo i 00340 00 M20 salad Mainto 7.07*.1 07 13 71a IIAoo l A 3,6 'AD¢A 100 1.00 0. San o.oo 012.1 a 4M iJ0 0.00 0040 0034 A,. 70ws l t0*lan" adn ft00 212050S 74am0,41 Omw, T,,s7.03 ad. 04.00011ý 24 01. 0 60 .0 a- IS.0.230% 00 01.0, 0N 0401, 0 003 0 0 0 0 14 0 O S4tl *,lq 0 00 a ad0.7 $0 0 00 %%,4"4 00 00 000.0 000. ad7100,0740 070400 034)7S smO." WS 446 0734 w3 w.7070.0477 4403 V7 a0 070 020 "06 7 ad 00000 204" 00 000.000 SM140 so 00734 $46,334 I7 u 04sm ON.I~faU00 A0040.0. ..04,60t., 0,h.000000000000070000007 I So0 0.00o001*34020, .0.14*10005W.0300010000000*044400074 o 001.04o I .0 072074.700700 0 L, soJ 130 4 07. A0D2 soO 2 00 51.9210 0077 04 S an3 a$,A B a in RAF7 490 WWo~4.O AN00.0. 7.0ft 70070, .0,0..27.010. Am l7o003 .0034% 2s.a0 11704 17.00.00 -3000% 140 0 s4eine4 si03 00. 96 o~oo so~o so,¢ sooo N 0005 74 ,0 0034i 0704.20l 02Mlm 707700 In'CA wild0 ad 5030.7%0 S01020$1MAIS 420 0.360 IVAII an, Ul.m0 uAn 007 o 2034 00.04*I IM 277.0s003 30272..04.

hoo.0000o,00U0bh

.0.0007400010.004,.2 ,Aid ldiý10.3 007*00,0 7020*047.00*

S 3 4m-.24 k'a 0o0 7004 In 743 0 0th 000,o0 0 0000s*000 0700 001.0 w020 teal Sloe Aelowod Moalt INcA.. 45.4 tOo..,o.J2.*

74o2.4 tMO, lAoo. 5001200 tON... tt*. W*. tt..o. CO5.A*. .50W... 001200 tO...loW LI.o0S$7.eO OSANe,, Ileoy~ tlalm. ~2(A5 WWYoUi00 Y*aAOO SiM-lofl CA..ofl TM-S TM-SOT *4.5,57 SiosCos Toe 00,4 COIl 152 PS.57W451*.SoaiS*wI

'0 n~ S in S StO00tiMI itO 4oOI*..M-2 seWos o..M-.o U ..n 1 2 0. 54243434 itO 0'5.WRtiOO$25*0W00 flf.otoeojto..o.AW.I.O.,$*

I0 so i.5t Qin....Iii., e04 4 A 57,42 IN 41.42 em om Om 0m 0 m to ON mom 5 52 55 34 U $2 W447.4 SZg04%2ý0 m0.001 fUmmrm f l s l i0+.Wm o, a ' iXU 2 a a 4142 WOS an 415. V M.S 44404.426i*w bt t2StSt ýt. tt.s,44434.A.,0.4 hAWK, .1 m0 7.2 elW .a$2 wi 811*43434~I 434* 2 3t4.WA2ON2$A13123 4 0010 I 4.SW T.*M 2 ~r Wm e 45UPA45.M-.4M NO43 Wl.029-+i*44M-

• 7o 5 1 *WPm4eW~alm ol WOO WN PaWOl .ot$4.Wore 3487.2 ~OmOttM-Mzt Wore 54.#..d4.t.02*..Wa VA VAVP&Ald 4U4M-gm m m1.as+-sm WLN 41724 W. w43 Sis 4,7. m on. Il o emi~o b In$MI 34S4.44 U=m &MN$"AN5W 5W =J7 54.3,7 Sý.,I.- "AW 51.200 BYR 2012-043 ENCLOSURE 2 CERTIFICATION OF FINANCIAL ASSURANCE December 2012 CERTIFICATION OF FINANCIAL ASSURANCE NRC Licensee: Yankee Atomic Electric Company Yankee Rowe Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation NRC License No. DPR-3 (NRC Docket Nos.50-029 and 72-31)49 Yankee Road Rowe, MA 01367 Issued to: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Certification:

I hereby certify that Yankee Atomic Electric Company (YAEC) is the licensee for the Yankee Rowe Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (Yankee Rowe ISFSI) and that 1, the undersigned, am authorized to provide this Certification of Financial Assurance with respect to the radiological decommissioning of the Yankee Rowe ISFSI.During the operation of this ISFSI, spent nuclear fuel and Greater than Class C waste will be stored at the Yankee Rowe ISFSI in storage casks licensed under 10 CFR 72. Pursuant to contracts with the Department of Energy the spent fuel and associated casks will ultimately be removed from the ISFSI location, and YAEC will dispose of other radiological waste in accordance with NRC regulations, at which time the Yankee Rowe ISFSI will be decommissioned in accordance with NRC regulations.

I further certify that financial assurance in an amount sufficient to fund Yankee Rowe ISFSI radiological decommissioning at the time of such decommissioning has been provided, pursuant to 10 CFR 72.30, as described in the letter to which this Certification is attached.

That radiological decommissioning funding assurance is premised on a site-specific decommissioning cost estimate and funding methodology described therein, in the amount of: Yankee Rowe ISFSI $ 8.5 million (inclusive of contingency)

Carla M. Pizzella Yankee Atomic Electric Compa Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer Phone (860) 267-6426 x304 Corporate Seal Date \I& \'/ k BYR 2012-043 ENCLOSURE 3 TOTAL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE YANKEE ROWE ISFSI, INCLUDING COST ESTIMATE FOR MANAGING IRRADIATED FUEL AND GTCC WASTE December 2012 Yankee Atomic Electric Company Irradiated Fuel & GTCC Waste Management and ISFSI Decom Estimate Represented in 2013 Dollars Data FERC Summarv Sum of 2013 Sum of 2014 Sum of 2015 Sum of 2016 Sum of 2017 Sum of 2018 Sum of 2019 Sum of 2020 Sum of 2021 Sum of 2022 i. --Contingency Insurance Labor -Non-Manual Labor -Security Materials

& Supplies Miscellaneous Outside Services -A&G Outside Services -Fuel Loading Outside Services -ISFSI OP's Outside Services -Legal Outside Services -NON-RAD D&D of ISFSI Outside Services -RAD D&D of ISFSI Property Taxes Regulatory Fees Utilities$357,690 $343,148 $353,128 $375,690 $375,315 $325,315 $727,380 $747,630 $0 $514,798$431,000 $537,667 $431,000 $431,000 $431,000 $431,000 $431,000 $431,000 $0 $1,054,000

$1,600,750

$1,600,750

$1,600,750

$1,600,750

$1,600,750

$1,600,750

$1,600,750

$1,620,750

$0 $1,024,750

$2,380,000

$2,380,000

$2,380,000

$2,380,000

$2,380,000

$2,380,000

$2,380,000

$2,380,000

$0 $0$75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $0 $20,000$80,950 $80,950 $80,950 $80,950 $80,950 $80,950 $80,950 $80,950 $0 $38,700$528,100 $720,600 $776,850 $1,478,100

$1,470,600

$470,600 $478,100 $470,600 $0 $577,530$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $260,000 $700,000 $0 $0$438,000 $548,000 $548,000 $548,000 $548,000 $548,000 $548,000 $548,000 $0 $75,000$900,000 $200,000 $450,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $700,000 $450,000 $0 $1,600,000

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,370,719

$0$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,723,604

$0$260,000 $260,000 $260,000 $260,000 $260,000 $260,000 $260,000 $260,000 $0 $100,000$390,000 $390,000 $390,000 $390,000 $390,000 $390,000 $390,000 $390,000 $0 $598,000$70000 $70000 $70.000 $70000 $70000 $70.000 $70.000 $70.000 $0 $60000 2013-2022$4,120,094

$4,608,667

$13,850,750

$19,040,000

$620,000$686,300$6,971,080

$960,000$4,349,000

$4,900,000

$1,370,719

$8,723,604

$2,180,000

$3,718,000

$620,000$76,718,214 Grand Total$7,511,490

$7,206,115

$7,415,678

$7,889,490

$7,881,615

$6,831,615

$8,001,180

$8,223,930

$10,094,323

$5,662,778 Note 1: The cost of management of irradiated fuel and GTCC waste is calculated as follows:$76,718,214 Grand Total from Above ($1,370,719)

Non-Rad D&D ISFSI ( Rad D&D ISFSI$66,623,891 Management of Irradiated Fuel and GTCC Waste Note 2: The cost of RAD and NON-RAD D&D of the ISFSI in 2013 dollars as provided in the column labeled "Sum of 2021" is derived by escalating the value of the cost estimates provided in Enclosure 1 by 2.5%.