ML18157A378: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) Created page by program invented by StriderTol |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) Created page by program invented by StriderTol |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:PUBLIC | {{#Wiki_filter:PUBLIC SUBMISSION As of: 6/5/18 12:53 PM Received: | ||
June 05, 2018 Status: Pending_Post Tracking No. | |||
1k2-93jq-txr5 Comments Due: | |||
June 05, 2018 | |||
Submission Type: | |||
WebDocket: NRC-2018-0017 Storing Spent Nuclear Fuel WasteComment On: | |||
NRC-2018-0017-0003 Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel Document: | |||
NRC-2018-0017-DRAFT-0055 Comment on FR Doc # 2018-05776 Submitter Information Name: Carmela Price Address: | |||
2401 Mariposa West Unit 1E Laguna Woods, CA, 92637 Email: etausk@comline.com General CommentI support the recommendations of the Citizens Oversight that a second layer of containment be required at San Onofre. A c ontainer wall of 5/8 inch thickness poses an unacceptable risk to the millions of pe ople in this area.Page 1 of 106/05/2018https://www.fdms.gov/ | |||
fdms/getcontent?object Id=090000648333e940&format=xml&showorig=false}} | |||
Revision as of 22:03, 28 June 2018
| ML18157A378 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 06/05/2018 |
| From: | Price C - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | NRC/SECY/RAS |
| SECY/RAS | |
| References | |
| 82FR12504 00052, NRC-2018-0017, PRM-72-8 | |
| Download: ML18157A378 (1) | |
Text
PUBLIC SUBMISSION As of: 6/5/18 12:53 PM Received:
June 05, 2018 Status: Pending_Post Tracking No.
1k2-93jq-txr5 Comments Due:
June 05, 2018
Submission Type:
WebDocket: NRC-2018-0017 Storing Spent Nuclear Fuel WasteComment On:
NRC-2018-0017-0003 Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel Document:
NRC-2018-0017-DRAFT-0055 Comment on FR Doc # 2018-05776 Submitter Information Name: Carmela Price Address:
2401 Mariposa West Unit 1E Laguna Woods, CA, 92637 Email: etausk@comline.com General CommentI support the recommendations of the Citizens Oversight that a second layer of containment be required at San Onofre. A c ontainer wall of 5/8 inch thickness poses an unacceptable risk to the millions of pe ople in this area.Page 1 of 106/05/2018https://www.fdms.gov/
fdms/getcontent?object Id=090000648333e940&format=xml&showorig=false