ML20207S533: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
StriderTol Bot insert
 
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:. . _ . . . _
{{#Wiki_filter:.
    -7   _
. _ . . . _
                                                                                                      gb :
-7
      .o
_
        I
gb :
                                                              MAR 2 31987                                               ,
.o
                  Docket No. 50-346'
I
                . Toledo Edison' Company                                                                               '
MAR 2 31987
                  ATTN: Mr. Joe Williams, Jr.
,
                                      Vice President-
Docket No. 50-346'
                                  ' Nuclear
. Toledo Edison' Company
                  Edison Plaza
'
                  300 Madison Avenue
ATTN: Mr. Joe Williams, Jr.
                Toledo, OH :43652_
Vice President-
                Gentlemen:
' Nuclear
                This refers to the routine team safety inspection conducted by Messrs.
Edison Plaza
              ~P.       Byron, D. Kosloff, R._ Cooper, A. DeAgazio, J. Isom, M. Johnson, L. Kanter.
300 Madison Avenue
                L.' Kelly, J. Smith, T. Stetka, L. Valenti, R. Westberg, L. Whitney, and
Toledo, OH :43652_
                P. Wohld of this office from December 1,1986, through January 31, 1987, of
Gentlemen:
                activities at Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station authorized by NRC' Operating
This refers to the routine team safety inspection conducted by Messrs.
                License No. NPF-3 and to the discussions of our findings with Mr. L. Storz
~P. Byron, D. Kosloff, R._ Cooper, A. DeAgazio, J. Isom, M. Johnson, L. Kanter.
                at the conclusion of the inspection.
L.' Kelly, J. Smith, T. Stetka, L. Valenti, R. Westberg, L. Whitney, and
                The enclosed copy of our inspection report identifies areas examined during
P. Wohld of this office from December 1,1986, through January 31, 1987, of
                the inspection. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of a selective
activities at Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station authorized by NRC' Operating
                examination of procedures and representative records, observations, and
License No. NPF-3 and to the discussions of our findings with Mr. L. Storz
                interviews with personnel.
at the conclusion of the inspection.
                During this inspection, certain of your activities appeared to be in violation
The enclosed copy of our inspection report identifies areas examined during
                of NRC requirements, as specified in the enclosed Notice. A written response
the inspection. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of a selective
                is required.- Although the safety significance of each violation in the
examination of procedures and representative records, observations, and
                                                -
interviews with personnel.
                                                                                            -
During this inspection, certain of your activities appeared to be in violation
                Notice may be minimal, we are concerned that when viewed collectively, they
of NRC requirements, as specified in the enclosed Notice. A written response
                represent a decrease in attention to detail and awareness of the status of
is required.- Although the safety significance of each violation in the
                plant equipment. Subsequent to the inspection, you requested a meeting to
-
                discuss your recent operating experience. During the meeting held on
-
              -February 27, 1987, you discussed a number of events and concerns, including
Notice may be minimal, we are concerned that when viewed collectively, they
              -those represented by the violations set'forth in the enclosure, and described
represent a decrease in attention to detail and awareness of the status of
                your corrective actions to minimize recurrence of these types of problems.
plant equipment. Subsequent to the inspection, you requested a meeting to
                We will closely monitor the effectiveness.of your corrective actions. Addi-
discuss your recent operating experience. During the meeting held on
                tional violations of this type could lead tc escalated enforcement.
-February 27, 1987, you discussed a number of events and concerns, including
                We are also concerned about an inadequate safety evaluation of a proposed
-those represented by the violations set'forth in the enclosure, and described
                deviation from the Course of Action (C0A) commitment regarding the lineup of
your corrective actions to minimize recurrence of these types of problems.
                the motor driven feedwater pump (MDFP) above 40% plant power (Paragraph 4 of
We will closely monitor the effectiveness.of your corrective actions. Addi-
                the inspection report). Your staff's verbal statement to NRR and to our
tional violations of this type could lead tc escalated enforcement.
                resident inspectors during the conference call on January 2,1987, indicated
We are also concerned about an inadequate safety evaluation of a proposed
deviation from the Course of Action (C0A) commitment regarding the lineup of
the motor driven feedwater pump (MDFP) above 40% plant power (Paragraph 4 of
the inspection report). Your staff's verbal statement to NRR and to our
resident inspectors during the conference call on January 2,1987, indicated
i
i
i
i
!                         G
!
G
Y
;
;
                                                                                                  )   Y
)
L                                                                                                 I (
L
I (
!
!
  .   .   , . . . , _ _ _ . , _ . - _ _ _ _ _ _               .._.-_,._.___.._ _ _ ._._ _ _ _ _ _
.
.
, . . . , _ _ _ . , _ . - _ _ _ _ _ _
.._.-_,._.___.._ _ _ ._._ _ _ _ _ _


                            _.
_.
  ..
..
        Toledo Edison Company                     2                 13 W
13 W
        that turning a switch in the control room was the only action required to
Toledo Edison Company
        initiate flow to the main feedwater system and avoid an unnecessary Steam
2
        and Feedwater Line Rupture Control System actuation. However, our resident
that turning a switch in the control room was the only action required to
        inspectors determined that a valve would also have to be manually closed
initiate flow to the main feedwater system and avoid an unnecessary Steam
        before starting the MDFP. This finding demonstrated that your review of
and Feedwater Line Rupture Control System actuation. However, our resident
        this matter was incomplete. Please-describe corrective actions you have
inspectors determined that a valve would also have to be manually closed
        planned or taken to assure such reviews are complete. In this regard, we
before starting the MDFP. This finding demonstrated that your review of
,
this matter was incomplete. Please-describe corrective actions you have
        also are concerned by your slowness in responding to our resident inspectors
planned or taken to assure such reviews are complete.
      original request to formally document your conversation with NRR on these
In this regard, we
      . changes.
also are concerned by your slowness in responding to our resident inspectors
        In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Consnission's reguiations, a copy of
,
      this letter, the enclosures, and your response to this letter.will be placed
original request to formally document your conversation with NRR on these
        in the NRC Public Document Room.
. changes.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Consnission's reguiations, a copy of
this letter, the enclosures, and your response to this letter.will be placed
in the NRC Public Document Room.
'
'
      We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.
We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.
                                                  Sincerely,
Sincerely,
                                                  ORIGINAL SIGNED BY C. E. NORELIUS
ORIGINAL SIGNED BY C. E. NORELIUS
                                                  Charles E. Norelius, Director
Charles E. Norelius, Director
                                                  Division'of Reactor Projects
Division'of Reactor Projects
      Enclosures:
Enclosures:
      1.   Notice of Violation
1.
      2.     Inspection Report
Notice of Violation
                No. 50-346/86032(DRP)
2.
      cc w/ enclosures:
Inspection Report
      L. Storz, Plant Manager
No. 50-346/86032(DRP)
      DCS/RSB (RIDS)
cc w/ enclosures:
      Licensing Fee Management Branch
L. Storz, Plant Manager
      Resident Inspector, RIII
DCS/RSB (RIDS)
      Harold W. Kohn, Ohio EPA
Licensing Fee Management Branch
      James W. Herris, State of Ohio
Resident Inspector, RIII
      Robert M. Quillin, Ohio
Harold W. Kohn, Ohio EPA
          Department of Health
James W. Herris, State of Ohio
      State of Ohio, Public
Robert M. Quillin, Ohio
          Utilities Commission
Department of Health
      RII                       R           RI         RIII
State of Ohio, Public
      Gul e opd/jp             DeFayette     ei)             us
Utilities Commission
            i %\                         S Of/7         3 p 31
RII
R
RI
RIII
Gul e opd/jp
DeFayette
ei)
us
i %\\
S Of/7
3 p 31
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 19:18, 6 December 2024

Forwards Safety Insp Rept 50-346/86-32 on 861201-870131 & Notice of Violation.Description of Actions Planned or Taken to Correct Inadequate Evaluation of Proposed Deviation from Commitment Re Motor Driven Feedwater Pump Requested
ML20207S533
Person / Time
Site: Davis Besse 
Issue date: 03/13/1987
From: Norelius C
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Williams J
TOLEDO EDISON CO.
Shared Package
ML20207S534 List:
References
NUDOCS 8703190640
Download: ML20207S533 (2)


See also: IR 05000346/1986032

Text

.

. _ . . . _

-7

_

gb :

.o

I

MAR 2 31987

,

Docket No. 50-346'

. Toledo Edison' Company

'

ATTN: Mr. Joe Williams, Jr.

Vice President-

' Nuclear

Edison Plaza

300 Madison Avenue

Toledo, OH :43652_

Gentlemen:

This refers to the routine team safety inspection conducted by Messrs.

~P. Byron, D. Kosloff, R._ Cooper, A. DeAgazio, J. Isom, M. Johnson, L. Kanter.

L.' Kelly, J. Smith, T. Stetka, L. Valenti, R. Westberg, L. Whitney, and

P. Wohld of this office from December 1,1986, through January 31, 1987, of

activities at Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station authorized by NRC' Operating

License No. NPF-3 and to the discussions of our findings with Mr. L. Storz

at the conclusion of the inspection.

The enclosed copy of our inspection report identifies areas examined during

the inspection. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of a selective

examination of procedures and representative records, observations, and

interviews with personnel.

During this inspection, certain of your activities appeared to be in violation

of NRC requirements, as specified in the enclosed Notice. A written response

is required.- Although the safety significance of each violation in the

-

-

Notice may be minimal, we are concerned that when viewed collectively, they

represent a decrease in attention to detail and awareness of the status of

plant equipment. Subsequent to the inspection, you requested a meeting to

discuss your recent operating experience. During the meeting held on

-February 27, 1987, you discussed a number of events and concerns, including

-those represented by the violations set'forth in the enclosure, and described

your corrective actions to minimize recurrence of these types of problems.

We will closely monitor the effectiveness.of your corrective actions. Addi-

tional violations of this type could lead tc escalated enforcement.

We are also concerned about an inadequate safety evaluation of a proposed

deviation from the Course of Action (C0A) commitment regarding the lineup of

the motor driven feedwater pump (MDFP) above 40% plant power (Paragraph 4 of

the inspection report). Your staff's verbal statement to NRR and to our

resident inspectors during the conference call on January 2,1987, indicated

i

i

!

G

Y

)

L

I (

!

.

.

, . . . , _ _ _ . , _ . - _ _ _ _ _ _

.._.-_,._.___.._ _ _ ._._ _ _ _ _ _

_.

..

13 W

Toledo Edison Company

2

that turning a switch in the control room was the only action required to

initiate flow to the main feedwater system and avoid an unnecessary Steam

and Feedwater Line Rupture Control System actuation. However, our resident

inspectors determined that a valve would also have to be manually closed

before starting the MDFP. This finding demonstrated that your review of

this matter was incomplete. Please-describe corrective actions you have

planned or taken to assure such reviews are complete.

In this regard, we

also are concerned by your slowness in responding to our resident inspectors

,

original request to formally document your conversation with NRR on these

. changes.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Consnission's reguiations, a copy of

this letter, the enclosures, and your response to this letter.will be placed

in the NRC Public Document Room.

'

We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.

Sincerely,

ORIGINAL SIGNED BY C. E. NORELIUS

Charles E. Norelius, Director

Division'of Reactor Projects

Enclosures:

1.

Notice of Violation

2.

Inspection Report

No. 50-346/86032(DRP)

cc w/ enclosures:

L. Storz, Plant Manager

DCS/RSB (RIDS)

Licensing Fee Management Branch

Resident Inspector, RIII

Harold W. Kohn, Ohio EPA

James W. Herris, State of Ohio

Robert M. Quillin, Ohio

Department of Health

State of Ohio, Public

Utilities Commission

RII

R

RI

RIII

Gul e opd/jp

DeFayette

ei)

us

i %\\

S Of/7

3 p 31