ML20207S533: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot insert |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot change |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:. . _ . . . _ | {{#Wiki_filter:. | ||
. _ . . . _ | |||
-7 | |||
_ | |||
gb : | |||
.o | |||
I | |||
MAR 2 31987 | |||
, | |||
Docket No. 50-346' | |||
. Toledo Edison' Company | |||
' | |||
ATTN: Mr. Joe Williams, Jr. | |||
Vice President- | |||
' Nuclear | |||
Edison Plaza | |||
300 Madison Avenue | |||
Toledo, OH :43652_ | |||
Gentlemen: | |||
This refers to the routine team safety inspection conducted by Messrs. | |||
~P. Byron, D. Kosloff, R._ Cooper, A. DeAgazio, J. Isom, M. Johnson, L. Kanter. | |||
L.' Kelly, J. Smith, T. Stetka, L. Valenti, R. Westberg, L. Whitney, and | |||
P. Wohld of this office from December 1,1986, through January 31, 1987, of | |||
activities at Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station authorized by NRC' Operating | |||
License No. NPF-3 and to the discussions of our findings with Mr. L. Storz | |||
at the conclusion of the inspection. | |||
The enclosed copy of our inspection report identifies areas examined during | |||
the inspection. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of a selective | |||
examination of procedures and representative records, observations, and | |||
interviews with personnel. | |||
During this inspection, certain of your activities appeared to be in violation | |||
of NRC requirements, as specified in the enclosed Notice. A written response | |||
is required.- Although the safety significance of each violation in the | |||
- | |||
- | |||
Notice may be minimal, we are concerned that when viewed collectively, they | |||
represent a decrease in attention to detail and awareness of the status of | |||
plant equipment. Subsequent to the inspection, you requested a meeting to | |||
discuss your recent operating experience. During the meeting held on | |||
-February 27, 1987, you discussed a number of events and concerns, including | |||
-those represented by the violations set'forth in the enclosure, and described | |||
your corrective actions to minimize recurrence of these types of problems. | |||
We will closely monitor the effectiveness.of your corrective actions. Addi- | |||
tional violations of this type could lead tc escalated enforcement. | |||
We are also concerned about an inadequate safety evaluation of a proposed | |||
deviation from the Course of Action (C0A) commitment regarding the lineup of | |||
the motor driven feedwater pump (MDFP) above 40% plant power (Paragraph 4 of | |||
the inspection report). Your staff's verbal statement to NRR and to our | |||
resident inspectors during the conference call on January 2,1987, indicated | |||
i | i | ||
i | i | ||
! | ! | ||
G | |||
Y | |||
; | ; | ||
) | |||
L | L | ||
I ( | |||
! | ! | ||
. | |||
. | |||
, . . . , _ _ _ . , _ . - _ _ _ _ _ _ | |||
.._.-_,._.___.._ _ _ ._._ _ _ _ _ _ | |||
_. | |||
.. | |||
13 W | |||
Toledo Edison Company | |||
2 | |||
that turning a switch in the control room was the only action required to | |||
initiate flow to the main feedwater system and avoid an unnecessary Steam | |||
and Feedwater Line Rupture Control System actuation. However, our resident | |||
inspectors determined that a valve would also have to be manually closed | |||
before starting the MDFP. This finding demonstrated that your review of | |||
this matter was incomplete. Please-describe corrective actions you have | |||
planned or taken to assure such reviews are complete. | |||
In this regard, we | |||
also are concerned by your slowness in responding to our resident inspectors | |||
, | |||
original request to formally document your conversation with NRR on these | |||
. changes. | |||
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Consnission's reguiations, a copy of | |||
this letter, the enclosures, and your response to this letter.will be placed | |||
in the NRC Public Document Room. | |||
' | ' | ||
We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection. | |||
Sincerely, | |||
ORIGINAL SIGNED BY C. E. NORELIUS | |||
Charles E. Norelius, Director | |||
Division'of Reactor Projects | |||
Enclosures: | |||
1. | |||
Notice of Violation | |||
2. | |||
Inspection Report | |||
No. 50-346/86032(DRP) | |||
cc w/ enclosures: | |||
L. Storz, Plant Manager | |||
DCS/RSB (RIDS) | |||
Licensing Fee Management Branch | |||
Resident Inspector, RIII | |||
Harold W. Kohn, Ohio EPA | |||
James W. Herris, State of Ohio | |||
Robert M. Quillin, Ohio | |||
Department of Health | |||
State of Ohio, Public | |||
Utilities Commission | |||
RII | |||
R | |||
RI | |||
RIII | |||
Gul e opd/jp | |||
DeFayette | |||
ei) | |||
us | |||
i %\\ | |||
S Of/7 | |||
3 p 31 | |||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 19:18, 6 December 2024
| ML20207S533 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Davis Besse |
| Issue date: | 03/13/1987 |
| From: | Norelius C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Williams J TOLEDO EDISON CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20207S534 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8703190640 | |
| Download: ML20207S533 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000346/1986032
Text
.
. _ . . . _
-7
_
gb :
.o
I
MAR 2 31987
,
Docket No. 50-346'
. Toledo Edison' Company
'
ATTN: Mr. Joe Williams, Jr.
Vice President-
' Nuclear
Edison Plaza
300 Madison Avenue
Toledo, OH :43652_
Gentlemen:
This refers to the routine team safety inspection conducted by Messrs.
~P. Byron, D. Kosloff, R._ Cooper, A. DeAgazio, J. Isom, M. Johnson, L. Kanter.
L.' Kelly, J. Smith, T. Stetka, L. Valenti, R. Westberg, L. Whitney, and
P. Wohld of this office from December 1,1986, through January 31, 1987, of
activities at Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station authorized by NRC' Operating
License No. NPF-3 and to the discussions of our findings with Mr. L. Storz
at the conclusion of the inspection.
The enclosed copy of our inspection report identifies areas examined during
the inspection. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of a selective
examination of procedures and representative records, observations, and
interviews with personnel.
During this inspection, certain of your activities appeared to be in violation
of NRC requirements, as specified in the enclosed Notice. A written response
is required.- Although the safety significance of each violation in the
-
-
Notice may be minimal, we are concerned that when viewed collectively, they
represent a decrease in attention to detail and awareness of the status of
plant equipment. Subsequent to the inspection, you requested a meeting to
discuss your recent operating experience. During the meeting held on
-February 27, 1987, you discussed a number of events and concerns, including
-those represented by the violations set'forth in the enclosure, and described
your corrective actions to minimize recurrence of these types of problems.
We will closely monitor the effectiveness.of your corrective actions. Addi-
tional violations of this type could lead tc escalated enforcement.
We are also concerned about an inadequate safety evaluation of a proposed
deviation from the Course of Action (C0A) commitment regarding the lineup of
the motor driven feedwater pump (MDFP) above 40% plant power (Paragraph 4 of
the inspection report). Your staff's verbal statement to NRR and to our
resident inspectors during the conference call on January 2,1987, indicated
i
i
!
G
Y
)
L
I (
!
.
.
, . . . , _ _ _ . , _ . - _ _ _ _ _ _
.._.-_,._.___.._ _ _ ._._ _ _ _ _ _
_.
..
13 W
Toledo Edison Company
2
that turning a switch in the control room was the only action required to
initiate flow to the main feedwater system and avoid an unnecessary Steam
and Feedwater Line Rupture Control System actuation. However, our resident
inspectors determined that a valve would also have to be manually closed
before starting the MDFP. This finding demonstrated that your review of
this matter was incomplete. Please-describe corrective actions you have
planned or taken to assure such reviews are complete.
In this regard, we
also are concerned by your slowness in responding to our resident inspectors
,
original request to formally document your conversation with NRR on these
. changes.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Consnission's reguiations, a copy of
this letter, the enclosures, and your response to this letter.will be placed
in the NRC Public Document Room.
'
We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.
Sincerely,
ORIGINAL SIGNED BY C. E. NORELIUS
Charles E. Norelius, Director
Division'of Reactor Projects
Enclosures:
1.
2.
Inspection Report
No. 50-346/86032(DRP)
cc w/ enclosures:
L. Storz, Plant Manager
DCS/RSB (RIDS)
Licensing Fee Management Branch
Resident Inspector, RIII
James W. Herris, State of Ohio
Robert M. Quillin, Ohio
Department of Health
State of Ohio, Public
Utilities Commission
RII
R
RI
RIII
Gul e opd/jp
DeFayette
ei)
us
i %\\
S Of/7
3 p 31