ML103560320: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:NEI 05-10 [Revision 3] March 2010 Security Frequently Asked Questions Process
{{#Wiki_filter:NEI 05-10 [Revision 3]
Security Frequently Asked Questions Process March 2010


[THIS PAGE IS LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY]
[THIS PAGE IS LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY]
Nuclear Energy Institute, 1776 I Street N. W., Suite 400, Washington D.C. (202.739.8000)  
NEI 05-10 [Revision 3]
 
Nuclear Energy Institute Security Frequently Asked Questions Process March 2010 Nuclear Energy Institute, 1776 I Street N. W., Suite 400, Washington D.C. (202.739.8000)
NEI 05-10 [Revision 3] Nuclear Energy InstituteSecurity Frequently Asked Questions Process March 2010 


[THIS PAGE IS LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY]
[THIS PAGE IS LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY]
 
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS NEI wishes to acknowledge the efforts of the NEI Security Frequently Asked Questions Task Force members, as well as industry and U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission contributors involved in developing this document.
Nuclear Energy Institute, 1776 I Street N. W., Suite 400, Washington D.C. (202.739.8000) ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS NEI wishes to acknowledge the efforts of the NEI Security Frequently Asked Questions Task Force members, as well as industry and U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission contributors involved in developing this document.
NOTICE Neither NEI, nor any of its employees, members, supporting organizations, contractors, or consultants make any warranty, expressed or implied, or assume any legal responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of, or assume any liability for damages resulting from any use of, any information apparatus, methods, or process disclosed in this report or that such may not infringe privately owned rights.
 
Nuclear Energy Institute, 1776 I Street N. W., Suite 400, Washington D.C. (202.739.8000)
NOTICE Neither NEI, nor any of its employees, members, supporting organizations, contractors, or consultants make any warranty, expressed or implied, or assume any legal responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of, or assume any liability for damages resulting from any use of, any information apparatus, methods, or process disclosed in this report or that such may not infringe privately owned rights.


[THIS PAGE IS LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY]
[THIS PAGE IS LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY]
NEI 05-10 (Revision 3) March 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 1 2 SFAQ CRITERIA ........................................................................................................................... 1 3 MAKEUP OF SECURITY QUESTION PANELS ..................................................................
NEI 05-10 (Revision 3)
33 3 2 2 4 REGULATORY PROCESS INTERFACE .............................................................................
March 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1   INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 1             Field Code Changed 2   SFAQ CRITERIA ........................................................................................................................... 1           Field Code Changed 3   MAKEUP OF SECURITY QUESTION PANELS .................................................................. 33322                                            Field Code Changed 4   REGULATORY PROCESS INTERFACE ............................................................................. 33322                                      Field Code Changed 5   SFAQ DOCUMENTATION AND SAFEGUARDS CONSIDERATIONS .............................. 33322                                                                  Field Code Changed 6   SFAQ LOG AND STATUS TRACKING ............................................................................... 44433                                    Field Code Changed 7   CONSENSUS AND APPROVAL AND APPEALS .............................................................. 44433                                                Field Code Changed 8   WITHDRAWAL, TRANSMITTAL, AND MODIFICATION .................................................. 44433                                                    Field Code Changed 9   SFAQ IMPLEMENTATION ................................................................................................. 66633                            Field Code Changed 10 PROCESS OUTLINE ........................................................................................................... 66644                      Field Code Changed 1011 ................................................................................................................... PROCESS FLOWCHART                 1010977 Field Code Changed 1112 ........................................................................................................................................ SFAQ FORM   11111088 Field Code Changed
33 3 2 2 5 SFAQ DOCUMENTATION AND SAFEGUARDS CONSIDERATIONS ..............................
33 3 2 2 6 SFAQ LOG AND STATUS TRACKING ...............................................................................
44 4 3 3 7 CONSENSUS AND APPROVAL AND APPEALS ..............................................................
44 4 3 3 8 WITHDRAWAL, TRANSMITTAL, AND MODIFICATION ..................................................
44 4 3 3 9 SFAQ IMPLEMENTATION .................................................................................................
66 6 3 3 10 PROCESS OUTLINE ...........................................................................................................
66 6 4 4 10 11 ................................................................................................................... PROCESS FLOWCHART 1010 9 7 7 11 12 ..............................................................................................................................
.......... SFAQ FORM 1111 10 8 8        Field Code ChangedField Code ChangedField Code ChangedField Code ChangedField Code ChangedField Code ChangedField Code ChangedField Code ChangedField Code ChangedField Code ChangedField Code ChangedField Code Changed NEI 05-10 (Revision 3) March 2010 Formatted: Right 


NEI 05-10 (Revision 3) Formatted: Right March 2010
[THIS PAGE IS LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY]
[THIS PAGE IS LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY]
NEI 05-10 (Revision 3) March 2010 1  SECURITY FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS PROCESS 1 INTRODUCTION The purpose of the Security Frequently Asked Question (SFAQ) process is to provide an organized forum for licensees and the NRC to resolve generic questions concerning the implementation of security requirements in a collaborative and coordinated context. This process is intended to support the resolution of licensees' questions in a timely and effective manner and support the NRC's exercising of its regulatory responsibility in the most efficient and direct manner possible.


NEI 05-10 (Revision 3)
March 2010 SECURITY FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS PROCESS 1 INTRODUCTION The purpose of the Security Frequently Asked Question (SFAQ) process is to provide an organized forum for licensees and the NRC to resolve generic questions concerning the implementation of security requirements in a collaborative and coordinated context. This process is intended to support the resolution of licensees questions in a timely and effective manner and support the NRCs exercising of its regulatory responsibility in the most efficient and direct manner possible.
It is clear that thisThe SFAQ process cannot be used to change any regulatory requirements promulgated through rules or orders. ItsThe intent of this process is to clarify existing guidance and to assist in addressing implementation questions related to security programs under 10 CFR Part 73.
It is clear that thisThe SFAQ process cannot be used to change any regulatory requirements promulgated through rules or orders. ItsThe intent of this process is to clarify existing guidance and to assist in addressing implementation questions related to security programs under 10 CFR Part 73.
2 SFAQ CRITERIA ToFor a question to be considered as anunder the SFAQ , a process, the question must be generic (i.e., have the potential to affect more than one plant without consideration or evaluation of site specific information). Potential SFAQs could include questions where the regulatory guidance may not be sufficiently clear , absent,licensees or where consistency in applicationthe NRC believe there would be a benefit both the NRC and licensees.
2 SFAQ CRITERIA ToFor a question to be considered as anunder the SFAQ, a process, the question must be generic (i.e., have the potential to affect more than one plant without consideration or evaluation of site specific information). Potential SFAQs could include questions where the regulatory guidance may not be sufficiently clear, absent,licensees or where consistency in applicationthe NRC believe there would be a benefit both the NRC and licensees.
for providing additional clarification of a requirement. In order to determine whether a question should be considered as anunder the SFAQ process, the initiating panel (industry or NRC) shall apply the following criteria:
for providing additional clarification of a requirement. In order to determine whether a question should be considered as anunder the SFAQ process, the initiating panel (industry or NRC) shall apply the following criteria:
: 1. The question must be sufficiently generic. (Does it affect more than one plant without consideration or evaluation of site specific information?)
: 1. The question must be sufficiently generic. (Does it affect more than one plant without consideration or evaluation of site specific information?)
: 2. The question does not involve unresolved inspection issues
: 2. The question does not involve unresolved inspection issues, enforcement actions, allegations, or other situations covered by existing regulatory processes. The SFAQ process may be used to disseminate information regarding resolved inspection issues, enforcement actions, allegations, or other situations covered by existing regulatory processes.
, enforcement actions, allegations, or other situations covered by existing regulatory processes. The SFAQ process may be used to disseminate information regarding resolved inspection issues, enforcement actions, allegations, or other situations covered by existing regulatory processes.
: 3. The resolution of the question should facilitate consistent implementation of industry or NRC security guidance.
: 3. The resolution of the question should facilitate consistent implementation of industry or NRC security guidance. If all the criteria are met, then an SFAQ isa question may be appropriate for resolution utilizing the SFAQ process. A bias toward initially screening in and discussing a question is appropriate for cases where conformance with the above criteria is unclear.
If all the criteria are met, then an SFAQ isa question may be appropriate for resolution utilizing the SFAQ process.
A bias toward initially screening in and discussing a question is appropriate for cases where conformance with the above criteria is unclear.
1


NEI 05-10 (Revision 3) March 2010 2 Formatted: RightIn those cases where it is not clear that a question meets all of the above criteria, the initiating panel should include the question in the SFAQ process for independent initial screening by each panel (Industry and NRC). and resolution by the Joint Panel (industry and NRC)
NEI 05-10 (Revision 3) Formatted: Right March 2010 In those cases where it is not clear that a question meets all of the above criteria, the initiating panel should include the question in the SFAQ process for independent initial screening by each panel (Industry and NRC). and resolution by the Joint Panel (industry and NRC).
.
2
NEI 05-10 (Revision 3) March 2010 3 3 MAKEUP OF SECURITY QUESTION PANELS The Industry Security Question Panel (hereafter referred to as the Industry Panel) will consist of representatives from the commercial nuclear power industry and at least one NEI representative. The Industry Panel members shall consist of management personnel experienced in security matters and represent the commercial nuclear industry. 
 
NEI senior management shall designate an NEI representative who will function as the Industry Panel Chair. The Industry Panel Chair will also arrange meetings and provide administrative support for the communication and transmittal of SFAQ status and resolution.
 
The licensee originating an SFAQ may be invited to provide a representative to present and describe the SFAQ at the meetings where the SFAQ is discussed.
 
NRC management will designate a corresponding review panel (hereafter referred to as the NRC Panel) and the NRC Panel Chairman.


NEI 05-10 (Revision 3)
March 2010 3 MAKEUP OF SECURITY QUESTION PANELS The Industry Security Question Panel (hereafter referred to as the Industry Panel) will consist of representatives from the commercial nuclear power industry and at least one NEI representative.
The Industry Panel members shall consist of management personnel experienced in security matters and represent the commercial nuclear industry.
NEI senior management shall designate an NEI representative who will function as the Industry Panel Chair. The Industry Panel Chair will also arrange meetings and provide administrative support for the communication and transmittal of SFAQ status and resolution.
The licensee originating an SFAQ may be invited to provide a representative to present and describe the SFAQ at the meetings where the SFAQ is discussed.
NRC management will designate a corresponding review panel (hereafter referred to as the NRC Panel) and the NRC Panel Chairman.
Within this document, the collective group of the Industry Panel and NRC Panel shall be referred to as the Joint Panel.
Within this document, the collective group of the Industry Panel and NRC Panel shall be referred to as the Joint Panel.
4 REGULATORY PROCESS INTERFACE The SFAQ process is intended to provide clear answers to generic questions that could affect industry implementation of security requirements. Frequently, generic questions are identified through the NRC Inspection and Enforcement process. It is important that the respective roles of each process be maintained. For the specific licensee(s) for which unresolved inspection issues or violations are involved, the inspection and enforcement process (including the licensee's option to appeal the NRC's decision) will take precedence and should proceed independently of the resolution of any related SFAQ. The SFAQ process must focus on a the generic question and avoid site-specific factors that might distort the understanding of the resolution.
4 REGULATORY PROCESS INTERFACE The SFAQ process is intended to provide clear answers to generic questions that could affect industry implementation of security requirements. Frequently, generic questions are identified through the NRC Inspection and Enforcement process. It is important that the respective roles of each process be maintained. For the specific licensee(s) for which unresolved inspection issues or violations are involved, the inspection and enforcement process (including the licensees option to appeal the NRCs decision) will take precedence and should proceed independently of the resolution of any related SFAQ. The SFAQ process must focus on a the generic question and avoid site-specific factors that might distort the understanding of the resolution.
5 SFAQ DOCUMENTATION AND SAFEGUARDS CONSIDERATIONS Many of the questions dealing with nuclear power plant security may involve Safeguards Information (SGI). Any person allowed access to SFAQs containing SGI must have an established "need to know" for the information and meet the requirements of 10 CFR 73.21. Any SGI material associated with the SFAQ must be stored, transmitted and distributed in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 73.21 and other applicable NRC requirements.
5 SFAQ DOCUMENTATION AND SAFEGUARDS CONSIDERATIONS Many of the questions dealing with nuclear power plant security may involve Safeguards Information (SGI). Any person allowed access to SFAQs containing SGI must have an established need to know for the information and meet the requirements of 10 CFR 73.21.
Non-SGI questions and related material will be handled in accordance with NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2005-26, "Control Of Sensitive Unclassified Non-Safeguards Information Related To Nuclear Power Reactors
Any SGI material associated with the SFAQ must be stored, transmitted and distributed in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 73.21 and other applicable NRC requirements.
, ," and with 10 CFR 2.390 - Exempt from "Public Disclosure
Non-SGI questions and related material will be handled in accordance with NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2005-26, Control Of Sensitive Unclassified Non-Safeguards Information Related To Nuclear Power Reactors,, and with 10 CFR 2.390 - Exempt from Public Disclosure,Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding, as applicable.
,Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding," as applicable.
Any SGI material associated with the SFAQ must be stored, transmitted and distributed according to 10 CFR 73.21 requirements.
Any SGI material associated with the SFAQ must be stored, transmitted and distributed according to 10 CFR 73.21 requirements.
3


NEI 05-10 (Revision 3) March 2010 4 Formatted: Right 6 SFAQ LOG AND STATUS TRACKING In order to facilitate efficient tracking, review, and closure of SFAQs, the Industry Panel Chair will maintain a non-Safeguards log of all SFAQs (SGI and non-SGI). SFAQs generated by the NRC Panel will be provided to the Industry Panel Chairman to be logged and tracked. The non-SGI log will show basic information such as unique tracking number, date initiated, initiator, and current status. This log will be available to each Panel Chairman and updated on a periodic basis.
NEI 05-10 (Revision 3) Formatted: Right March 2010 6 SFAQ LOG AND STATUS TRACKING In order to facilitate efficient tracking, review, and closure of SFAQs, the Industry Panel Chair will maintain a non-Safeguards log of all SFAQs (SGI and non-SGI). SFAQs generated by the NRC Panel will be provided to the Industry Panel Chairman to be logged and tracked. The non-SGI log will show basic information such as unique tracking number, date initiated, initiator, and current status. This log will be available to each Panel Chairman and updated on a periodic basis.
Both Panel Chairs will maintain a file of in-process and completed SFAQs.  
Both Panel Chairs will maintain a file of in-process and completed SFAQs.
7 CONSENSUS AND APPROVAL AND APPEALS Members of the Industry Panel and the NRC Panel will form a Joint Panel and work together to attain Separately, each panel will meet and examine the questions (SFAQs) that have been accepted for consideration, developing a response that is documented on the form. Then, the two panels will meet, on an as needed base. The objective of the meeting is to share and/or present each panels views of SFAQs submitted. The objective of the Joint Panel is to facilitate the timely, clear resolution of SFAQs. The joint panel will work together to reach a mutual understanding of the issue for the NRC to reach a resolution of the SFAQ. to arrive at a consensus resolution of the SFAQ for NRC consideration. When the panels agree on an SFAQ, it is provided to the Final approval of SFAQ answers are the responsibility of the NRC Deputy Director - Division of Nuclear Security. The Joint Panel will strive to provide a draft answer acceptable to both Panels. Policy (DSP) for final approval. Where agreementconsensusmutual understandingthe panels do not agree, cannot be reached, the Panels (Industry and/or NRC) each        Formatted: Not Highlight panel may submit alternative answers and comments regarding other options under consideration          Formatted: Not Highlight with written rationale for final approval. This information shall be provided to the NRC              Formatted: Not Highlight Director - DSP- Division of Nuclear Security and with copies provided to both Panelspanels.
Upon reaching a decision between alternate proposed SFAQ responses, the NRC Director - -
DSPDivision of Nuclear Security will provide a response notingback to both panels setting forth the rationale for rejecting the unacceptedchosen option to both Panels..
When mutual understanding consensus can notcannot be reached between If the industry                  Formatted: Not Highlight disagrees with the decision of the and the NRCNRC-Director-DSP, the industry has the right to          Formatted: Not Highlight appeal the decision as outlined in section 10, step 5.                                                Formatted: Not Highlight 8 WITHDRAWAL, TRANSMITTAL, AND MODIFICATION An SFAQ may be withdrawn by the initiating Panel at any time prior to final disposition.
Once an SFAQ response/solution has been approved by NRC it is distributed by NEI and the NRC using approved means. In addition, the NEI representative will update the SFAQ Log.
Formatted: Normal 4


7 CONSENSUS AND APPROVAL AND APPEALS Members of the Industry Panel and the NRC Panel will form a Joint Panel and work together to attain Separately, each panel will meet and examine the questions (SFAQs) that have been accepted for consideration, developing a response that is documented on the form. Then, the two panels will meet, on an as needed base. The objective of the meeting is to share and/or present each panel's views of SFAQs submitted. The objective of the Joint Panel is to facilitate the timely, clear resolution of SFAQs. The joint panel will work together to reach a mutual understanding of the issue for the NRC to reach a resolution of the SFAQ.
NEI 05-10 (Revision 3)
to arrive at a consensus resolution of the SFAQ for NRC consideration. When the panels agree on an SFAQ, it is provided to the Final approval of SFAQ answers are the responsibility of the NRC Deputy Director - Division of Nuclear Security. The Joint Panel will strive to provide a draft answer acceptable to both Panels. Policy (DSP) for final approval
March 2010 In the event that any approved SFAQ resolution is subsequently determined to require revision, the revised SFAQ must be reprocessed.
. Where agreementconsensusmutual understandingthe panels do not agree,  cannot be reached, the Panels (Industry and/or NRC) each panel may submit alternative answers and comments regarding other options under consideration with written rationale for final approval. This information shall be provided to the NRC Director - DSP- Division of Nuclear Security and with copies provided to both Panelspanels. Upon reaching a decision between alternate proposed SFAQ responses, the NRC Director - - DSPDivision of Nuclear Security  will provide a response notingback to both panels setting forth the rationale for rejecting the unacceptedchosen option to both Panels.
5
. When mutual understanding consensus can notcannot be reached between If the industry disagrees with the decision of the and t he NRCNRC-Director-DSP, the industry has the right to appeal the decision as outlined in section 10, step 5.
8 WITHDRAWAL, TRANSMITTAL, AND MODIFICATION An SFAQ may be withdrawn by the initiating Panel at any time prior to final disposition.


Once an SFAQ response/solution has been approved by NRC it is distributed by NEI and the NRC using approved means. In addition, the NEI representative will update the SFAQ Log.
NEI 05-10 (Revision 3) Formatted: Right March 2010 9 SFAQ IMPLEMENTATION SFAQs that involve generic changes to the NEI 03-12 template language should be revised               Formatted: Normal immediately through the licensees security plans if required to demonstrate compliance with NRC regulations. SFAQs that affect the site specific information provided as bracketed text within NEI 03-12 should be changed through the licensees security plans as necessary. Utilities should make any necessary changes to their Security Plan, (PSP), Training and Qualification Plan and(T&Q), Contingency Plan (SCP), and Cyber Security Plan (CSP) consistent with the implementation date agreed upon by the industry and NRC. The NRC will be notified of the changes in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.54(p).
Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted: Normal NEI 05-10 (Revision 3) March 2010 5 In the event that any approved SFAQ resolution is subsequently determined to require revision, the revised SFAQ must be reprocessed.
The following statement should be considered in the accepted SFAQs that affect NEI 03-12 black text: Licensees submitting their security plans using the NRC endorsed NEI 03-12 revision [#] template should revise the endorsed text in section [] of the [PSP, T&Q, SCP as appropriate] by [provide direction on text to be revised, replaced, inserted, and when it should be revisedetc]. ].
NEI 05-10 (Revision 3) March 2010 6 Formatted: Right 9 SFAQ IMPLEMENTATION SFAQs that involve generic changes to the NEI 03-12 template language should be revised immediately through the licensee's security plans if required to demonstrate compliance with NRC regulations. SFAQs that affect the site specific information provided as bracketed text within NEI 03-12 should be changed through the licensee's security plans as necessary.
The change to the NRC endorsed NEI 03-12 revision [#] language should be listed on the Table of Deviations from NEI 03-12 rev.revision [#] Text which has been provided by NEI to accompany each plan submittal. The justification that should be provided on the table is Language revised in accordance with SFAQ # [09-##].[##-##].
Utilities should make any necessary changes to their Security Plan
10 PROCESS OUTLINE In addition to the following SFAQ process description, a flow chart of this process is provided as .
, (PSP), Training and Qualification Plan and(T&Q), Contingency Plan (SCP), and Cyber Security Plan (CSP) consistent with the implementation date agreed upon by the industry and NRC.
Identification and Question Development (Step 1)
The NRC will be notified of the changes in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.54(p).  
Industry or NRC personnel will send potential SFAQs arising from internal reviews, industry operating experience, NRC inspections, or other sources, to the Industry Panel Chair. Use of the SFAQ form (Attachment 2) is encouraged. The proposed SFAQ should provide appropriate references from regulatory or industry documents. The history, operating conditions and description of security features may be relevant and should be included as supporting documentation. The submittal should include a proposed answer where possible. The NRC will establish a similar process governed by their internal procedures. Initiators should check the SFAQ log to prevent redundancy with existing questions. It is imperative that facts and supporting documentation are complete and accurate in all material respects.
 
Joint Panel Screening (Step 2)
The following statement should be considered in the accepted SFAQs that affect NEI 03-12 black text: "Licensees submitting their security plans using the NRC endorsed NEI 03-12 revision [#] template should revise the endorsed text in section [-] of the [PSP, T&Q, SCP as appropriate] by [provide direction on text to be revised, replaced, inserted, and when it should be revisedetc
The Joint PanelBoth panels separately shall conduct an initial screening of proposed SFAQs to determine whether they meet the criteria of Section 2. In the event that a question does not meet those criteria, or where it duplicates questions addressed in existing SFAQs or other questions undergoing screening, the appropriate Panel Chair shall notify the originator that the question will not be resolved through the SFAQ process. For cases which are screened as meeting criteria for an SFAQ, a brief description shall be provided to the Industry Panel Chairman who shall assign an SFAQ number and enter it in the SFAQ Log.
]. ]". The change to the NRC endorsed NEI 03-12 revision [#] language should be listed on the "Table of Deviations from NEI 03-12 rev.revision [#] Text" which has been provided by NEI to accompany each plan submittal. The justification that should be provided on the table is "Language revised in accordance with SFAQ # [09-##]".[##-##]". 10 PROCESS OUTLINE In addition to the following SFAQ process description, a flow chart of this process is provided as Attachment 1. Identification and Question Development (Step 1) Industry or NRC personnel will send potential SFAQs arising from internal reviews, industry operating experience, NRC inspections, or other sources, to the Industry Panel Chair. Use of the SFAQ form (Attachment 2) is encouraged. The proposed SFAQ should provide appropriate references from regulatory or industry documents. The history, operating conditions and description of security features may be relevant and should be included as supporting documentation. The submittal should include a proposed answer where possible. The NRC will establish a similar process governed by their internal procedures. Initiators should check the SFAQ log to prevent redundancy with existing questions. It is imperative that facts and supporting documentation are complete and accurate in all material respects. Joint Panel Screening (Step 2) The Joint PanelBoth panels separately shall conduct an initial screening of proposed SFAQs to determine whether they meet the criteria of Section 2. In the event that a question does not meet those criteria, or where it duplicates questions addressed in existing SFAQs or other questions undergoing screening, the appropriate Panel Chair shall notify the originator that the question will not be resolved through the SFAQ process. For cases which are screened as meeting criteria for an SFAQ, a brief description shall be provided to the Industry Panel Chairman who shall assign an SFAQ number and enter it in the SFAQ Log.
6
Formatted: Normal NEI 05-10 (Revision 3) March 2010 7
NEI 05-10 (Revision 3) March 2010 8 Formatted: RightInternally Develop a Proposed Response (Step 3) Once a question is accepted by each panelthe Joint P panel s as an SFAQ, the Joint Panel shall assign an individual from the initiating Panel will be assigned to further develop the proposed final response if necessary. This shall will include consideration of proposals by the initiator. The proposed final response should be internally discussed within the initiating Panel. After this internal consideration, the SFAQ
, including the proposed final response
, shall will be submitted via the appropriate Panel Chair to the counterpart Panel. This effort should be done two weeks prior to the meeting unless the frequency of meetings requires compression of that interval. Joint Panel Interaction and Review (Step 4) The Joint Panel(s) will meet periodically to discuss SFAQs. Items for the agenda shall will be agreed upon by the Panel Chairs and should include as many pending SFAQs thatas can be accommodated. New SFAQs on the agenda should be presented by the initiating Panel. While the draft should already have been distributed, this presentation provides an opportunity to ask clarifying questions. Candid exchange is encouraged to facilitate consideration of all pertinent aspects by all parties. In cases involving a question that is in need of prompt resolution, the Joint Panel(s) may immediately reach a mutual understanding of the SFAQaccelerate the processing of the SFAQ.
with general consensus on the answer and where prompt resolution is needed, the Joint Panel may reach immediate consensus and the SFAQ could be directly recommended for approval
, but Tthis must be identified to both Chairs sufficiently in advance to permit appropriate internal review. After internal review subsequent to this initial presentation, written revisions or alternative resolutions should be developed with rationale provided. These should be provided to both panels via their Chairs at least one week in advance of the subsequent Joint Panel meeting. At the second meeting regarding a specific SFAQ, the Joint Panel(s) should discuss present the proposed final resolution(s). If mutual understandingagreement cannot is not be reached, both Panels should attain a clear understanding of the outstanding points of agreement and disagreement in order to hat modifyied or clarify their panel's proposed resolution s for subsequent discussionreviewcan be developed
. by each panel
. One or both panels should agree to take action to provide a revised proposed final resolution at the next meeting. Appeal (if necessary) (Step 5)
If mutual understandingconsensus cannot be reached after the second joint the panel(s) dopanels do not agree at the second meeting, each panel shall send its proposed resolution of the SFAQ shall be referred to the NRC Deputy Director - DSPfor Reactor Security  for a decision.
Resolution options from both Panels shall be provided in such instances. Communication prior to  Each panel (industry and NRC) has the opportunity to comment on the others proposed resolution before presentation to the Deputy Director shall include opportunity to document comments on proposals from the other Panel.
. Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted: Not Highlight NEI 05-10 (Revision 3) March 2010 9 After approvalthe decision by the NRC Deputy Director - DSPfor Reactor Security , a copy of the approved SFAQ response/solution shall be returned to the IndustryJoint Panel(s) Chair. The IndustryJoint Panels separately Chair shallwill review the documentSFAQ response to check that its content is consistent with the ir Industry Panel's understanding of the SFAQ's finalproposed resolution
.. submitted to the NRC
. The industry, as represented by the NEI Chief Nuclear Officer, may appeal decisions of the Deputy Director - DSPfor Reactor Security  to NRC management (Director of the Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response) within one month. The decision of the Director of the Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response is the NRC's final resolution and position of the SFAQ. The NRC should attempt to resolve the industry's appeal within one month of its receipt. The SFAQ will not be issued until the appeal has been resolved. Dissemination (Step 6)
Once an SFAQ response/solution has been approved by the NRC, it is distributed by NEI using any approved means. In addition, the NEI representative will update the SFAQ Log. Since SFAQ responses/solutions are clarifications of guidance, they can be effective immediately. If implementation timing guidance is appropriate, those should be arranged between the Panel Chairs and communicated concurrently with dissemination of the SFAQ answer. Prior to issuance, the proposed solution text of the SFAQ worksheet will be deleted to assure a clear understanding of the final response.
Formatted: Outline numbered + Level: 1 +Numbering Style: 1, 2, 3, - + Start at: 1 +Alignment: Left + Aligned at:  0" + Tab after:
0.3" + Indent at:  0.3" NEI 05-10 (Revision 3) March 2010 10 Formatted: Right 10 11 PROCESS FLOWCHART


NEI 05-10 (Revision 3) March 2010 11 11 12 SFAQ FORM SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION OR EXEMPT FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE IN ACCORDANCE WITH 10 CFR 2.390 (WHEN COMPLETED) OR SECURITY RELATED INFORMATION - WITHHOLD UNDER 10 CFR §2.390 (WHEN COMPLETED)
NEI 05-10 (Revision 3)
SFAQ YY-XX Title Security Frequently Asked Questions (SFAQ) Request Form SFAQ Number:__________
March 2010 7
(Requestor to Complete) Licensee:      Date Submitted:Licensee Contact:        Phone:  E-mail:  NRC Contact:        Phone:        E-mail:
Potentially relevant existing SFAQ numbers:        This question involves: (check all that apply)    Design Basis , Force-on-Force , Training , Access , Security Plan , Cyber , Other  Question, including background description and applicable reference(s): Proposed Solution:        Additional pages attached?  Yes N o (NEI to complete) Request #
Date entered By:
SFAQ Evaluation and Resolution Section Form Revision 3, 03/10 SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION OR EXEMPT FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE IN ACCORDANCE WITH 10 CFR 2.390 (WHEN COMPLETED) OR SECURITY RELATED INFORMATION - WITHHOLD UNDER 10 CFR §2.390 (WHEN COMPLETED)


NEI 05-10 (Revision 3) March 2010 12 Formatted: RightSAFEGUARDS INFORMATION OR EXEMPT FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE IN ACCORDANCE WITH 10 CFR 2.390 (WHEN COMPLETED) OR SECURITY RELATED INFORMATION - WITHHOLD UNDER 10 CFR §2.390 (WHEN COMPLETED)
NEI 05-10 (Revision 3) Formatted: Right March 2010 Internally Develop a Proposed Response (Step 3)
Security Frequently Asked Questions (SFAQ) Request Form SFAQ Number:__________ 
Once a question is accepted by each panelthe Joint Ppanels as an SFAQ, the Joint Panel shall assign an individual from the initiating Panel will be assigned to further develop the proposed final response if necessary. This shall will include consideration of proposals by the initiator.
The proposed final response should be internally discussed within the initiating Panel. After this internal consideration, the SFAQ, including the proposed final response, shall will be submitted via the appropriate Panel Chair to the counterpart Panel. This effort should be done two weeks prior to the meeting unless the frequency of meetings requires compression of that interval.
Joint Panel Interaction and Review (Step 4)
The Joint Panel(s) will meet periodically to discuss SFAQs. Items for the agenda shall will be agreed upon by the Panel Chairs and should include as many pending SFAQs thatas can be accommodated.
New SFAQs on the agenda should be presented by the initiating Panel. While the draft should already have been distributed, this presentation provides an opportunity to ask clarifying questions. Candid exchange is encouraged to facilitate consideration of all pertinent aspects by all parties.
In cases involving a question that is in need of prompt resolution, the Joint Panel(s) may              Formatted: Not Highlight immediately reach a mutual understanding of the SFAQaccelerate the processing of the SFAQ.              Formatted: Not Highlight with general consensus on the answer and where prompt resolution is needed, the Joint Panel            Formatted: Not Highlight may reach immediate consensus and the SFAQ could be directly recommended for approval, but Tthis must be identified to both Chairs sufficiently in advance to permit appropriate internal review.
After internal review subsequent to this initial presentation, written revisions or alternative resolutions should be developed with rationale provided. These should be provided to both panels via their Chairs at least one week in advance of the subsequent Joint Panel meeting.
At the second meeting regarding a specific SFAQ, the Joint Panel(s) should discuss present the          Formatted: Not Highlight proposed final resolution(s). If mutual understandingagreement cannot is not be reached, both          Formatted: Not Highlight Panels should attain a clear understanding of the outstanding points of agreement and                  Formatted: Not Highlight disagreement in order to hat modifyied or clarify their panels proposed resolutions for subsequent discussionreviewcan be developed. by each panel. One or both panels should agree            Formatted: Not Highlight to take action to provide a revised proposed final resolution at the next meeting.                      Formatted: Not Highlight Appeal (if necessary) (Step 5)
If mutual understandingconsensus cannot be reached after the second joint the panel(s) dopanels        Formatted: Not Highlight do not agree at the second meeting, each panel shall send its proposed resolution of the SFAQ           Formatted: Not Highlight shall be referred to the NRC Deputy Director - DSPfor Reactor Security for a decision.                  Formatted: Not Highlight Resolution options from both Panels shall be provided in such instances. Communication prior to Each panel (industry and NRC) has the opportunity to comment on the others proposed resolution before presentation to the Deputy Director shall include opportunity to document comments on proposals from the other Panel..
8


Resolution of SFAQ (NRC Security Question Panel Chairman) Approved by:
NEI 05-10 (Revision 3)
Date:       (Industry Security Question Panel Chairman) Approved by:      
March 2010 After approvalthe decision by the NRC Deputy Director - DSPfor Reactor Security, a copy of the approved SFAQ response/solution shall be returned to the IndustryJoint Panel(s) Chair. The IndustryJoint Panels separately Chair shallwill review the documentSFAQ response to check that its content is consistent with their Industry Panels understanding of the SFAQs finalproposed resolution.. submitted to the NRC.
The industry, as represented by the NEI Chief Nuclear Officer, may appeal decisions of the Deputy Director - DSPfor Reactor Security to NRC management (Director of the Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response) within one month. The decision of the Director of the Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response is the NRCs final resolution and position of the SFAQ. The NRC should attempt to resolve the industrys appeal within one month of its receipt. The SFAQ will not be issued until the appeal has been resolved.
Dissemination (Step 6)
Once an SFAQ response/solution has been approved by the NRC, it is distributed by NEI using any approved means. In addition, the NEI representative will update the SFAQ Log. Since SFAQ responses/solutions are clarifications of guidance, they can be effective immediately. If implementation timing guidance is appropriate, those should be arranged between the Panel Chairs and communicated concurrently with dissemination of the SFAQ answer. Prior to issuance, the proposed solution text of the SFAQ worksheet will be deleted to assure a clear understanding of the final response.
Formatted: Outline numbered + Level: 1 +
Numbering Style: 1, 2, 3, + Start at: 1 +
Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0" + Tab after:
0.3" + Indent at: 0.3" 9


Date:      
NEI 05-10 (Revision 3) Formatted: Right March 2010 1011 PROCESS FLOWCHART 10


SFAQ closed in tracking system and SFAQ database updated: Date: Form Revision 3, 03/10  
NEI 05-10 (Revision 3)
March 2010 1112 SFAQ FORM SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION OR EXEMPT FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE IN ACCORDANCE WITH 10 CFR 2.390 (WHEN COMPLETED)
OR SECURITY RELATED INFORMATION - WITHHOLD UNDER 10 CFR §2.390 (WHEN COMPLETED)
SFAQ YY-XX Title Security Frequently Asked Questions (SFAQ) Request Form SFAQ Number:__________
(Requestor to Complete)
Licensee:                                                  Date Submitted:
Licensee Contact:                              Phone:                E-mail:
NRC Contact:                                    Phone:                E-mail:
Potentially relevant existing SFAQ numbers:
This question involves:        Design Basis , Force-on-Force , Training    ,
(check all that apply)          Access , Security Plan , Cyber , Other Question, including background description and applicable reference(s):
Proposed Solution:
Additional pages attached? Yes        No (NEI to complete)
Request #                        Date entered                  By:
SFAQ Evaluation and Resolution Section Form Revision 3, 03/10 SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION OR EXEMPT FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE IN ACCORDANCE WITH 10 CFR 2.390 (WHEN COMPLETED)
OR SECURITY RELATED INFORMATION - WITHHOLD UNDER 10 CFR §2.390 (WHEN COMPLETED) 11


SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION OR EXEMPT FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE IN ACCORDANCE WITH 10 CFR 2.390 (WHEN COMPLETED) OR SECURITY RELATED INFORMATION - WITHHOLD UNDER 10 CFR §2.390 (WHEN COMPLETED) Issue presented at Joint NRC/NEI Security Question Panel: Date     Resolution Requires a Document(s) Revision:   Yes No Document(s):}}
NEI 05-10 (Revision 3) Formatted: Right March 2010 SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION OR EXEMPT FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE IN ACCORDANCE WITH 10 CFR 2.390 (WHEN COMPLETED)
OR SECURITY RELATED INFORMATION - WITHHOLD UNDER 10 CFR §2.390 (WHEN COMPLETED)
Security Frequently Asked Questions (SFAQ) Request Form SFAQ Number:__________
Issue presented at Joint NRC/NEI Security Question Panel: Date Resolution of SFAQ Resolution Requires a Document(s) Revision: Yes       No   Document(s):
(NRC Security Question Panel Chairman)
Approved by:                                    Date:
(Industry Security Question Panel Chairman)
Approved by:                                    Date:
SFAQ closed in tracking system and SFAQ database updated: Date:
Form Revision 3, 03/10 SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION OR EXEMPT FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE IN ACCORDANCE WITH 10 CFR 2.390 (WHEN COMPLETED)
OR SECURITY RELATED INFORMATION - WITHHOLD UNDER 10 CFR §2.390 (WHEN COMPLETED) 12}}

Revision as of 05:16, 13 November 2019

Enclosure - NRC Comments on NEI 05-10 Security Frequently Asked Questions Process, Rev 3
ML103560320
Person / Time
Site: Nuclear Energy Institute
Issue date: 07/19/2011
From: Michael Layton
Division of Security Policy
To: Earls C
Nuclear Energy Institute
Roundtree, Amy - NSIR/DSP/RSRLB
Shared Package
ML103560357 List:
References
NSIR 10-1005, NEI 05-10, Rev 3
Download: ML103560320 (20)


Text

NEI 05-10 [Revision 3]

Security Frequently Asked Questions Process March 2010

[THIS PAGE IS LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY]

NEI 05-10 [Revision 3]

Nuclear Energy Institute Security Frequently Asked Questions Process March 2010 Nuclear Energy Institute, 1776 I Street N. W., Suite 400, Washington D.C. (202.739.8000)

[THIS PAGE IS LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY]

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS NEI wishes to acknowledge the efforts of the NEI Security Frequently Asked Questions Task Force members, as well as industry and U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission contributors involved in developing this document.

NOTICE Neither NEI, nor any of its employees, members, supporting organizations, contractors, or consultants make any warranty, expressed or implied, or assume any legal responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of, or assume any liability for damages resulting from any use of, any information apparatus, methods, or process disclosed in this report or that such may not infringe privately owned rights.

Nuclear Energy Institute, 1776 I Street N. W., Suite 400, Washington D.C. (202.739.8000)

[THIS PAGE IS LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY]

NEI 05-10 (Revision 3)

March 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 1 Field Code Changed 2 SFAQ CRITERIA ........................................................................................................................... 1 Field Code Changed 3 MAKEUP OF SECURITY QUESTION PANELS .................................................................. 33322 Field Code Changed 4 REGULATORY PROCESS INTERFACE ............................................................................. 33322 Field Code Changed 5 SFAQ DOCUMENTATION AND SAFEGUARDS CONSIDERATIONS .............................. 33322 Field Code Changed 6 SFAQ LOG AND STATUS TRACKING ............................................................................... 44433 Field Code Changed 7 CONSENSUS AND APPROVAL AND APPEALS .............................................................. 44433 Field Code Changed 8 WITHDRAWAL, TRANSMITTAL, AND MODIFICATION .................................................. 44433 Field Code Changed 9 SFAQ IMPLEMENTATION ................................................................................................. 66633 Field Code Changed 10 PROCESS OUTLINE ........................................................................................................... 66644 Field Code Changed 1011 ................................................................................................................... PROCESS FLOWCHART 1010977 Field Code Changed 1112 ........................................................................................................................................ SFAQ FORM 11111088 Field Code Changed

NEI 05-10 (Revision 3) Formatted: Right March 2010

[THIS PAGE IS LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY]

NEI 05-10 (Revision 3)

March 2010 SECURITY FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS PROCESS 1 INTRODUCTION The purpose of the Security Frequently Asked Question (SFAQ) process is to provide an organized forum for licensees and the NRC to resolve generic questions concerning the implementation of security requirements in a collaborative and coordinated context. This process is intended to support the resolution of licensees questions in a timely and effective manner and support the NRCs exercising of its regulatory responsibility in the most efficient and direct manner possible.

It is clear that thisThe SFAQ process cannot be used to change any regulatory requirements promulgated through rules or orders. ItsThe intent of this process is to clarify existing guidance and to assist in addressing implementation questions related to security programs under 10 CFR Part 73.

2 SFAQ CRITERIA ToFor a question to be considered as anunder the SFAQ, a process, the question must be generic (i.e., have the potential to affect more than one plant without consideration or evaluation of site specific information). Potential SFAQs could include questions where the regulatory guidance may not be sufficiently clear, absent,licensees or where consistency in applicationthe NRC believe there would be a benefit both the NRC and licensees.

for providing additional clarification of a requirement. In order to determine whether a question should be considered as anunder the SFAQ process, the initiating panel (industry or NRC) shall apply the following criteria:

1. The question must be sufficiently generic. (Does it affect more than one plant without consideration or evaluation of site specific information?)
2. The question does not involve unresolved inspection issues, enforcement actions, allegations, or other situations covered by existing regulatory processes. The SFAQ process may be used to disseminate information regarding resolved inspection issues, enforcement actions, allegations, or other situations covered by existing regulatory processes.
3. The resolution of the question should facilitate consistent implementation of industry or NRC security guidance.

If all the criteria are met, then an SFAQ isa question may be appropriate for resolution utilizing the SFAQ process.

A bias toward initially screening in and discussing a question is appropriate for cases where conformance with the above criteria is unclear.

1

NEI 05-10 (Revision 3) Formatted: Right March 2010 In those cases where it is not clear that a question meets all of the above criteria, the initiating panel should include the question in the SFAQ process for independent initial screening by each panel (Industry and NRC). and resolution by the Joint Panel (industry and NRC).

2

NEI 05-10 (Revision 3)

March 2010 3 MAKEUP OF SECURITY QUESTION PANELS The Industry Security Question Panel (hereafter referred to as the Industry Panel) will consist of representatives from the commercial nuclear power industry and at least one NEI representative.

The Industry Panel members shall consist of management personnel experienced in security matters and represent the commercial nuclear industry.

NEI senior management shall designate an NEI representative who will function as the Industry Panel Chair. The Industry Panel Chair will also arrange meetings and provide administrative support for the communication and transmittal of SFAQ status and resolution.

The licensee originating an SFAQ may be invited to provide a representative to present and describe the SFAQ at the meetings where the SFAQ is discussed.

NRC management will designate a corresponding review panel (hereafter referred to as the NRC Panel) and the NRC Panel Chairman.

Within this document, the collective group of the Industry Panel and NRC Panel shall be referred to as the Joint Panel.

4 REGULATORY PROCESS INTERFACE The SFAQ process is intended to provide clear answers to generic questions that could affect industry implementation of security requirements. Frequently, generic questions are identified through the NRC Inspection and Enforcement process. It is important that the respective roles of each process be maintained. For the specific licensee(s) for which unresolved inspection issues or violations are involved, the inspection and enforcement process (including the licensees option to appeal the NRCs decision) will take precedence and should proceed independently of the resolution of any related SFAQ. The SFAQ process must focus on a the generic question and avoid site-specific factors that might distort the understanding of the resolution.

5 SFAQ DOCUMENTATION AND SAFEGUARDS CONSIDERATIONS Many of the questions dealing with nuclear power plant security may involve Safeguards Information (SGI). Any person allowed access to SFAQs containing SGI must have an established need to know for the information and meet the requirements of 10 CFR 73.21.

Any SGI material associated with the SFAQ must be stored, transmitted and distributed in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 73.21 and other applicable NRC requirements.

Non-SGI questions and related material will be handled in accordance with NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2005-26, Control Of Sensitive Unclassified Non-Safeguards Information Related To Nuclear Power Reactors,, and with 10 CFR 2.390 - Exempt from Public Disclosure,Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding, as applicable.

Any SGI material associated with the SFAQ must be stored, transmitted and distributed according to 10 CFR 73.21 requirements.

3

NEI 05-10 (Revision 3) Formatted: Right March 2010 6 SFAQ LOG AND STATUS TRACKING In order to facilitate efficient tracking, review, and closure of SFAQs, the Industry Panel Chair will maintain a non-Safeguards log of all SFAQs (SGI and non-SGI). SFAQs generated by the NRC Panel will be provided to the Industry Panel Chairman to be logged and tracked. The non-SGI log will show basic information such as unique tracking number, date initiated, initiator, and current status. This log will be available to each Panel Chairman and updated on a periodic basis.

Both Panel Chairs will maintain a file of in-process and completed SFAQs.

7 CONSENSUS AND APPROVAL AND APPEALS Members of the Industry Panel and the NRC Panel will form a Joint Panel and work together to attain Separately, each panel will meet and examine the questions (SFAQs) that have been accepted for consideration, developing a response that is documented on the form. Then, the two panels will meet, on an as needed base. The objective of the meeting is to share and/or present each panels views of SFAQs submitted. The objective of the Joint Panel is to facilitate the timely, clear resolution of SFAQs. The joint panel will work together to reach a mutual understanding of the issue for the NRC to reach a resolution of the SFAQ. to arrive at a consensus resolution of the SFAQ for NRC consideration. When the panels agree on an SFAQ, it is provided to the Final approval of SFAQ answers are the responsibility of the NRC Deputy Director - Division of Nuclear Security. The Joint Panel will strive to provide a draft answer acceptable to both Panels. Policy (DSP) for final approval. Where agreementconsensusmutual understandingthe panels do not agree, cannot be reached, the Panels (Industry and/or NRC) each Formatted: Not Highlight panel may submit alternative answers and comments regarding other options under consideration Formatted: Not Highlight with written rationale for final approval. This information shall be provided to the NRC Formatted: Not Highlight Director - DSP- Division of Nuclear Security and with copies provided to both Panelspanels.

Upon reaching a decision between alternate proposed SFAQ responses, the NRC Director - -

DSPDivision of Nuclear Security will provide a response notingback to both panels setting forth the rationale for rejecting the unacceptedchosen option to both Panels..

When mutual understanding consensus can notcannot be reached between If the industry Formatted: Not Highlight disagrees with the decision of the and the NRCNRC-Director-DSP, the industry has the right to Formatted: Not Highlight appeal the decision as outlined in section 10, step 5. Formatted: Not Highlight 8 WITHDRAWAL, TRANSMITTAL, AND MODIFICATION An SFAQ may be withdrawn by the initiating Panel at any time prior to final disposition.

Once an SFAQ response/solution has been approved by NRC it is distributed by NEI and the NRC using approved means. In addition, the NEI representative will update the SFAQ Log.

Formatted: Normal 4

NEI 05-10 (Revision 3)

March 2010 In the event that any approved SFAQ resolution is subsequently determined to require revision, the revised SFAQ must be reprocessed.

5

NEI 05-10 (Revision 3) Formatted: Right March 2010 9 SFAQ IMPLEMENTATION SFAQs that involve generic changes to the NEI 03-12 template language should be revised Formatted: Normal immediately through the licensees security plans if required to demonstrate compliance with NRC regulations. SFAQs that affect the site specific information provided as bracketed text within NEI 03-12 should be changed through the licensees security plans as necessary. Utilities should make any necessary changes to their Security Plan, (PSP), Training and Qualification Plan and(T&Q), Contingency Plan (SCP), and Cyber Security Plan (CSP) consistent with the implementation date agreed upon by the industry and NRC. The NRC will be notified of the changes in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.54(p).

The following statement should be considered in the accepted SFAQs that affect NEI 03-12 black text: Licensees submitting their security plans using the NRC endorsed NEI 03-12 revision [#] template should revise the endorsed text in section [] of the [PSP, T&Q, SCP as appropriate] by [provide direction on text to be revised, replaced, inserted, and when it should be revisedetc]. ].

The change to the NRC endorsed NEI 03-12 revision [#] language should be listed on the Table of Deviations from NEI 03-12 rev.revision [#] Text which has been provided by NEI to accompany each plan submittal. The justification that should be provided on the table is Language revised in accordance with SFAQ # [09-##].[##-##].

10 PROCESS OUTLINE In addition to the following SFAQ process description, a flow chart of this process is provided as .

Identification and Question Development (Step 1)

Industry or NRC personnel will send potential SFAQs arising from internal reviews, industry operating experience, NRC inspections, or other sources, to the Industry Panel Chair. Use of the SFAQ form (Attachment 2) is encouraged. The proposed SFAQ should provide appropriate references from regulatory or industry documents. The history, operating conditions and description of security features may be relevant and should be included as supporting documentation. The submittal should include a proposed answer where possible. The NRC will establish a similar process governed by their internal procedures. Initiators should check the SFAQ log to prevent redundancy with existing questions. It is imperative that facts and supporting documentation are complete and accurate in all material respects.

Joint Panel Screening (Step 2)

The Joint PanelBoth panels separately shall conduct an initial screening of proposed SFAQs to determine whether they meet the criteria of Section 2. In the event that a question does not meet those criteria, or where it duplicates questions addressed in existing SFAQs or other questions undergoing screening, the appropriate Panel Chair shall notify the originator that the question will not be resolved through the SFAQ process. For cases which are screened as meeting criteria for an SFAQ, a brief description shall be provided to the Industry Panel Chairman who shall assign an SFAQ number and enter it in the SFAQ Log.

6

NEI 05-10 (Revision 3)

March 2010 7

NEI 05-10 (Revision 3) Formatted: Right March 2010 Internally Develop a Proposed Response (Step 3)

Once a question is accepted by each panelthe Joint Ppanels as an SFAQ, the Joint Panel shall assign an individual from the initiating Panel will be assigned to further develop the proposed final response if necessary. This shall will include consideration of proposals by the initiator.

The proposed final response should be internally discussed within the initiating Panel. After this internal consideration, the SFAQ, including the proposed final response, shall will be submitted via the appropriate Panel Chair to the counterpart Panel. This effort should be done two weeks prior to the meeting unless the frequency of meetings requires compression of that interval.

Joint Panel Interaction and Review (Step 4)

The Joint Panel(s) will meet periodically to discuss SFAQs. Items for the agenda shall will be agreed upon by the Panel Chairs and should include as many pending SFAQs thatas can be accommodated.

New SFAQs on the agenda should be presented by the initiating Panel. While the draft should already have been distributed, this presentation provides an opportunity to ask clarifying questions. Candid exchange is encouraged to facilitate consideration of all pertinent aspects by all parties.

In cases involving a question that is in need of prompt resolution, the Joint Panel(s) may Formatted: Not Highlight immediately reach a mutual understanding of the SFAQaccelerate the processing of the SFAQ. Formatted: Not Highlight with general consensus on the answer and where prompt resolution is needed, the Joint Panel Formatted: Not Highlight may reach immediate consensus and the SFAQ could be directly recommended for approval, but Tthis must be identified to both Chairs sufficiently in advance to permit appropriate internal review.

After internal review subsequent to this initial presentation, written revisions or alternative resolutions should be developed with rationale provided. These should be provided to both panels via their Chairs at least one week in advance of the subsequent Joint Panel meeting.

At the second meeting regarding a specific SFAQ, the Joint Panel(s) should discuss present the Formatted: Not Highlight proposed final resolution(s). If mutual understandingagreement cannot is not be reached, both Formatted: Not Highlight Panels should attain a clear understanding of the outstanding points of agreement and Formatted: Not Highlight disagreement in order to hat modifyied or clarify their panels proposed resolutions for subsequent discussionreviewcan be developed. by each panel. One or both panels should agree Formatted: Not Highlight to take action to provide a revised proposed final resolution at the next meeting. Formatted: Not Highlight Appeal (if necessary) (Step 5)

If mutual understandingconsensus cannot be reached after the second joint the panel(s) dopanels Formatted: Not Highlight do not agree at the second meeting, each panel shall send its proposed resolution of the SFAQ Formatted: Not Highlight shall be referred to the NRC Deputy Director - DSPfor Reactor Security for a decision. Formatted: Not Highlight Resolution options from both Panels shall be provided in such instances. Communication prior to Each panel (industry and NRC) has the opportunity to comment on the others proposed resolution before presentation to the Deputy Director shall include opportunity to document comments on proposals from the other Panel..

8

NEI 05-10 (Revision 3)

March 2010 After approvalthe decision by the NRC Deputy Director - DSPfor Reactor Security, a copy of the approved SFAQ response/solution shall be returned to the IndustryJoint Panel(s) Chair. The IndustryJoint Panels separately Chair shallwill review the documentSFAQ response to check that its content is consistent with their Industry Panels understanding of the SFAQs finalproposed resolution.. submitted to the NRC.

The industry, as represented by the NEI Chief Nuclear Officer, may appeal decisions of the Deputy Director - DSPfor Reactor Security to NRC management (Director of the Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response) within one month. The decision of the Director of the Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response is the NRCs final resolution and position of the SFAQ. The NRC should attempt to resolve the industrys appeal within one month of its receipt. The SFAQ will not be issued until the appeal has been resolved.

Dissemination (Step 6)

Once an SFAQ response/solution has been approved by the NRC, it is distributed by NEI using any approved means. In addition, the NEI representative will update the SFAQ Log. Since SFAQ responses/solutions are clarifications of guidance, they can be effective immediately. If implementation timing guidance is appropriate, those should be arranged between the Panel Chairs and communicated concurrently with dissemination of the SFAQ answer. Prior to issuance, the proposed solution text of the SFAQ worksheet will be deleted to assure a clear understanding of the final response.

Formatted: Outline numbered + Level: 1 +

Numbering Style: 1, 2, 3, + Start at: 1 +

Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0" + Tab after:

0.3" + Indent at: 0.3" 9

NEI 05-10 (Revision 3) Formatted: Right March 2010 1011 PROCESS FLOWCHART 10

NEI 05-10 (Revision 3)

March 2010 1112 SFAQ FORM SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION OR EXEMPT FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE IN ACCORDANCE WITH 10 CFR 2.390 (WHEN COMPLETED)

OR SECURITY RELATED INFORMATION - WITHHOLD UNDER 10 CFR §2.390 (WHEN COMPLETED)

SFAQ YY-XX Title Security Frequently Asked Questions (SFAQ) Request Form SFAQ Number:__________

(Requestor to Complete)

Licensee: Date Submitted:

Licensee Contact: Phone: E-mail:

NRC Contact: Phone: E-mail:

Potentially relevant existing SFAQ numbers:

This question involves: Design Basis , Force-on-Force , Training ,

(check all that apply) Access , Security Plan , Cyber , Other Question, including background description and applicable reference(s):

Proposed Solution:

Additional pages attached? Yes No (NEI to complete)

Request # Date entered By:

SFAQ Evaluation and Resolution Section Form Revision 3, 03/10 SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION OR EXEMPT FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE IN ACCORDANCE WITH 10 CFR 2.390 (WHEN COMPLETED)

OR SECURITY RELATED INFORMATION - WITHHOLD UNDER 10 CFR §2.390 (WHEN COMPLETED) 11

NEI 05-10 (Revision 3) Formatted: Right March 2010 SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION OR EXEMPT FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE IN ACCORDANCE WITH 10 CFR 2.390 (WHEN COMPLETED)

OR SECURITY RELATED INFORMATION - WITHHOLD UNDER 10 CFR §2.390 (WHEN COMPLETED)

Security Frequently Asked Questions (SFAQ) Request Form SFAQ Number:__________

Issue presented at Joint NRC/NEI Security Question Panel: Date Resolution of SFAQ Resolution Requires a Document(s) Revision: Yes No Document(s):

(NRC Security Question Panel Chairman)

Approved by: Date:

(Industry Security Question Panel Chairman)

Approved by: Date:

SFAQ closed in tracking system and SFAQ database updated: Date:

Form Revision 3, 03/10 SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION OR EXEMPT FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE IN ACCORDANCE WITH 10 CFR 2.390 (WHEN COMPLETED)

OR SECURITY RELATED INFORMATION - WITHHOLD UNDER 10 CFR §2.390 (WHEN COMPLETED) 12