ML16125A014: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:1 NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Klett, Audrey Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 5:04 PM To:'Mitch.Guth@fpl.com' Cc:'Hanek, Olga' (Olga.Hanek@fpl.com)
{{#Wiki_filter:NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:                             Klett, Audrey Sent:                             Tuesday, May 03, 2016 5:04 PM To:                               'Mitch.Guth@fpl.com' Cc:                               'Hanek, Olga' (Olga.Hanek@fpl.com)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
NRC LIC-109 Acceptance Review Results fo r Turkey Point 3 & 4 License Amendment Request No. 242 (CAC Nos. MF7557 and MF7558)
NRC LIC-109 Acceptance Review Results for Turkey Point 3 & 4 License Amendment Request No. 242 (CAC Nos. MF7557 and MF7558)
Hi Mitch,
Hi Mitch, By application dated April 4, 2016 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No.
 
ML16110A266), Florida Power & Light Company (the licensee) requested license amendments for Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 3 and 4. The NRC performed an acceptance review of the application to determine if the scope and depth of technical information is sufficient for the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review also intends to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
By application dated April 4, 2016 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML16110A266), Florida Power & Light Company (the licensee) requested license amendments for Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 3 and 4. The NRC performed an acceptance review of the application to determine if the scope and depth of technical information is sufficient for the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review also intends to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff concluded that the licensees submittal provides technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which the NRC staff identifies issues that affect its ability to complete the detailed technical review despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If the NRC staff needs additional information, it will notify the licensee by separate correspondence.
The NRC staff concluded that the licensee's submittal provides technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed te chnical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be in stances in which the NRC staff identifies issues that affect its ability to complete the detailed technical review despite completion of an adequate acceptance  
 
review. If the NRC staff needs additional information, it will notify the licensee by separate correspondence.  
 
If you have any questions, please call me at (301) 415-0489.
If you have any questions, please call me at (301) 415-0489.
Audrey Klett  
Audrey Klett Project Manager NRR/DORL/LPLII-2 301-415-0489 1
 
Project Manager NRR/DORL/LPLII-2  


301-415-0489
Hearing Identifier:     NRR_PMDA Email Number:           2818 Mail Envelope Properties       (Audrey.Klett@nrc.gov20160503170300)
 
Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 2818   Mail Envelope Properties   (Audrey.Klett@nrc.gov20160503170300)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
NRC LIC-109 Acceptance Review Results for Turkey Point 3 & 4 License Amendment Request No. 242 (CAC Nos. MF7557 and MF7558) Sent Date:   5/3/2016 5:03:30 PM Received Date: 5/3/2016 5:03:00 PM From:   Klett, Audrey Created By:   Audrey.Klett@nrc.gov Recipients:     "'Hanek, Olga' (Olga.Hanek@fpl.com)" <Olga.Hanek@fpl.com> Tracking Status: None
NRC LIC-109 Acceptance Review Results for Turkey Point 3 & 4 License Amendment Request No. 242 (CAC Nos. MF7557 and MF7558)
"'Mitch.Guth@fpl.com'" <Mitch.Guth@fpl.com> Tracking Status: None Post Office:     Files     Size     Date & Time MESSAGE   1560     5/3/2016 5:03:00 PM
Sent Date:             5/3/2016 5:03:30 PM Received Date:         5/3/2016 5:03:00 PM From:                   Klett, Audrey Created By:             Audrey.Klett@nrc.gov Recipients:
"'Hanek, Olga' (Olga.Hanek@fpl.com)" <Olga.Hanek@fpl.com>
Tracking Status: None
"'Mitch.Guth@fpl.com'" <Mitch.Guth@fpl.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
Files                           Size                   Date & Time MESSAGE                         1560                   5/3/2016 5:03:00 PM Options Priority:                        Standard Return Notification:            No Reply Requested:                No Sensitivity:                    Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received:


Options  Priority:    Standard  Return Notification:    No  Reply Requested:    No  Sensitivity:    Normal  Expiration Date:      Recipients Received:
NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:                             Klett, Audrey Sent:                             Tuesday, May 03, 2016 5:04 PM To:                               'Mitch.Guth@fpl.com' Cc:                               'Hanek, Olga' (Olga.Hanek@fpl.com)
1 NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Klett, Audrey Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 5:04 PM To:'Mitch.Guth@fpl.com' Cc:'Hanek, Olga' (Olga.Hanek@fpl.com)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
NRC LIC-109 Acceptance Review Results fo r Turkey Point 3 & 4 License Amendment Request No. 242 (CAC Nos. MF7557 and MF7558)
NRC LIC-109 Acceptance Review Results for Turkey Point 3 & 4 License Amendment Request No. 242 (CAC Nos. MF7557 and MF7558)
Hi Mitch,
Hi Mitch, By application dated April 4, 2016 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No.
 
ML16110A266), Florida Power & Light Company (the licensee) requested license amendments for Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 3 and 4. The NRC performed an acceptance review of the application to determine if the scope and depth of technical information is sufficient for the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review also intends to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
By application dated April 4, 2016 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML16110A266), Florida Power & Light Company (the licensee) requested license amendments for Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 3 and 4. The NRC performed an acceptance review of the application to determine if the scope and depth of technical information is sufficient for the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review also intends to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff concluded that the licensees submittal provides technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which the NRC staff identifies issues that affect its ability to complete the detailed technical review despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If the NRC staff needs additional information, it will notify the licensee by separate correspondence.
The NRC staff concluded that the licensee's submittal provides technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed te chnical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be in stances in which the NRC staff identifies issues that affect its ability to complete the detailed technical review despite completion of an adequate acceptance  
 
review. If the NRC staff needs additional information, it will notify the licensee by separate correspondence.  
 
If you have any questions, please call me at (301) 415-0489.
If you have any questions, please call me at (301) 415-0489.
Audrey Klett  
Audrey Klett Project Manager NRR/DORL/LPLII-2 301-415-0489 1


Project Manager NRR/DORL/LPLII-2
Hearing Identifier:     NRR_PMDA Email Number:           2818 Mail Envelope Properties       (Audrey.Klett@nrc.gov20160503170300)
 
301-415-0489
 
Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 2818   Mail Envelope Properties   (Audrey.Klett@nrc.gov20160503170300)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
NRC LIC-109 Acceptance Review Results for Turkey Point 3 & 4 License Amendment Request No. 242 (CAC Nos. MF7557 and MF7558) Sent Date:   5/3/2016 5:03:30 PM Received Date: 5/3/2016 5:03:00 PM From:   Klett, Audrey Created By:   Audrey.Klett@nrc.gov Recipients:     "'Hanek, Olga' (Olga.Hanek@fpl.com)" <Olga.Hanek@fpl.com> Tracking Status: None
NRC LIC-109 Acceptance Review Results for Turkey Point 3 & 4 License Amendment Request No. 242 (CAC Nos. MF7557 and MF7558)
"'Mitch.Guth@fpl.com'" <Mitch.Guth@fpl.com> Tracking Status: None Post Office:     Files     Size     Date & Time MESSAGE   1560     5/3/2016 5:03:00 PM
Sent Date:             5/3/2016 5:03:30 PM Received Date:         5/3/2016 5:03:00 PM From:                   Klett, Audrey Created By:             Audrey.Klett@nrc.gov Recipients:
 
"'Hanek, Olga' (Olga.Hanek@fpl.com)" <Olga.Hanek@fpl.com>
Options Priority:     Standard   Return Notification:   No   Reply Requested:   No   Sensitivity:     Normal Expiration Date:     Recipients Received:}}
Tracking Status: None
"'Mitch.Guth@fpl.com'" <Mitch.Guth@fpl.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
Files                           Size                   Date & Time MESSAGE                         1560                   5/3/2016 5:03:00 PM Options Priority:                       Standard Return Notification:             No Reply Requested:                 No Sensitivity:                     Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received:}}

Revision as of 20:46, 30 October 2019

NRC LIC-109 Acceptance Review Results for Turkey Point 3 & 4 License Amendment Request No. 242 (CAC Nos. MF7557 and MF7558)
ML16125A014
Person / Time
Site: Monticello Xcel Energy icon.png
Issue date: 05/03/2016
From: Audrey Klett
Plant Licensing Branch II
To: Hanek O
Florida Power & Light Co
References
MF7557, MF7558
Download: ML16125A014 (2)


Text

NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Klett, Audrey Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 5:04 PM To: 'Mitch.Guth@fpl.com' Cc: 'Hanek, Olga' (Olga.Hanek@fpl.com)

Subject:

NRC LIC-109 Acceptance Review Results for Turkey Point 3 & 4 License Amendment Request No. 242 (CAC Nos. MF7557 and MF7558)

Hi Mitch, By application dated April 4, 2016 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No.

ML16110A266), Florida Power & Light Company (the licensee) requested license amendments for Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 3 and 4. The NRC performed an acceptance review of the application to determine if the scope and depth of technical information is sufficient for the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review also intends to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff concluded that the licensees submittal provides technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which the NRC staff identifies issues that affect its ability to complete the detailed technical review despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If the NRC staff needs additional information, it will notify the licensee by separate correspondence.

If you have any questions, please call me at (301) 415-0489.

Audrey Klett Project Manager NRR/DORL/LPLII-2 301-415-0489 1

Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 2818 Mail Envelope Properties (Audrey.Klett@nrc.gov20160503170300)

Subject:

NRC LIC-109 Acceptance Review Results for Turkey Point 3 & 4 License Amendment Request No. 242 (CAC Nos. MF7557 and MF7558)

Sent Date: 5/3/2016 5:03:30 PM Received Date: 5/3/2016 5:03:00 PM From: Klett, Audrey Created By: Audrey.Klett@nrc.gov Recipients:

"'Hanek, Olga' (Olga.Hanek@fpl.com)" <Olga.Hanek@fpl.com>

Tracking Status: None

"'Mitch.Guth@fpl.com'" <Mitch.Guth@fpl.com>

Tracking Status: None Post Office:

Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1560 5/3/2016 5:03:00 PM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received:

NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Klett, Audrey Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 5:04 PM To: 'Mitch.Guth@fpl.com' Cc: 'Hanek, Olga' (Olga.Hanek@fpl.com)

Subject:

NRC LIC-109 Acceptance Review Results for Turkey Point 3 & 4 License Amendment Request No. 242 (CAC Nos. MF7557 and MF7558)

Hi Mitch, By application dated April 4, 2016 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No.

ML16110A266), Florida Power & Light Company (the licensee) requested license amendments for Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 3 and 4. The NRC performed an acceptance review of the application to determine if the scope and depth of technical information is sufficient for the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review also intends to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff concluded that the licensees submittal provides technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which the NRC staff identifies issues that affect its ability to complete the detailed technical review despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If the NRC staff needs additional information, it will notify the licensee by separate correspondence.

If you have any questions, please call me at (301) 415-0489.

Audrey Klett Project Manager NRR/DORL/LPLII-2 301-415-0489 1

Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 2818 Mail Envelope Properties (Audrey.Klett@nrc.gov20160503170300)

Subject:

NRC LIC-109 Acceptance Review Results for Turkey Point 3 & 4 License Amendment Request No. 242 (CAC Nos. MF7557 and MF7558)

Sent Date: 5/3/2016 5:03:30 PM Received Date: 5/3/2016 5:03:00 PM From: Klett, Audrey Created By: Audrey.Klett@nrc.gov Recipients:

"'Hanek, Olga' (Olga.Hanek@fpl.com)" <Olga.Hanek@fpl.com>

Tracking Status: None

"'Mitch.Guth@fpl.com'" <Mitch.Guth@fpl.com>

Tracking Status: None Post Office:

Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1560 5/3/2016 5:03:00 PM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received: