NRC Generic Letter 1982-17: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 10/11/1982
| issue date = 10/11/1982
| title = NRC Generic Letter 1982-017: Inconsistency Between Requirements of 10 CFR 50.54(t) and Standard Technical Specifications for Performing Audits of Emergency Preparedness Programs
| title = NRC Generic Letter 1982-017: Inconsistency Between Requirements of 10 CFR 50.54(t) and Standard Technical Specifications for Performing Audits of Emergency Preparedness Programs
| author name = Eisenhut D G
| author name = Eisenhut D
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  

Revision as of 05:22, 14 July 2019

NRC Generic Letter 1982-017: Inconsistency Between Requirements of 10 CFR 50.54(t) and Standard Technical Specifications for Performing Audits of Emergency Preparedness Programs
ML031080321
Person / Time
Site: Beaver Valley, Millstone, Hatch, Monticello, Calvert Cliffs, Dresden, Davis Besse, Peach Bottom, Browns Ferry, Salem, Oconee, Mcguire, Nine Mile Point, Palisades, Palo Verde, Perry, Indian Point, Fermi, Kewaunee, Catawba, Harris, Wolf Creek, Saint Lucie, Point Beach, Oyster Creek, Watts Bar, Grand Gulf, Cooper, Sequoyah, Byron, Pilgrim, Arkansas Nuclear, Braidwood, Susquehanna, Summer, Prairie Island, Columbia, Seabrook, Brunswick, Surry, Limerick, North Anna, Turkey Point, River Bend, Vermont Yankee, Crystal River, Haddam Neck, Ginna, Diablo Canyon, Callaway, Vogtle, Waterford, Duane Arnold, Farley, Robinson, Clinton, South Texas, San Onofre, Cook, Yankee Rowe, Maine Yankee, Quad Cities, Humboldt Bay, La Crosse, Big Rock Point, Rancho Seco, Zion, Midland, Bellefonte, Fort Calhoun, FitzPatrick, McGuire, LaSalle, 05000514, 05000000, 05000515, Zimmer, Fort Saint Vrain, Washington Public Power Supply System, Shoreham, Satsop, Trojan, Bailly, Atlantic Nuclear Power Plant, Perkins, Cherokee, Marble Hill, Hartsville, Phipps Bend, Yellow Creek, Crane
Issue date: 10/11/1982
From: Eisenhut D
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
References
GL-82-017, NUDOCS 8210040068
Download: ML031080321 (3)


I OCT 01 198 TO ALL LICENSEES

ANM APPLICANiTS

FOR OPERATINiG

P(AlER REACTORS AiO 1OOLJERS OF CONSTRUCTION

PERHITS FOR POWER REACTORS Gentlenen:

SUBJECT: INCOWI'SISTENCY

BETWEEN REQUIREft.NTS

OF 10 CFR 50.54(t)AND) STAiIDARU

TECHNICAL

SPECIFICATION4S

FOR PERFORIMING

AUDITS OF EIERGENCY

PREPAREDNESS

PisOGRA.1S (Generic Letter No. 82-17)Section 50.54(t) of Title 10 of the Code that each nuclear power reactor licensee of its einergency preparedness program at of Federal Regulations requires provide for an independent review least every 12 months.It has comie to our attention that the Standard Technical Specifications in use by a number of licensees and some existing plant-specific Technical Specifications require that this independent audit be carried out every 24 months.All licensees are required to neet the requiremnents of 10 CFR 50.54(t), notwithstanding any provision that nay have been in their Technical Specifications prior to the issuance of 10 CFR 3u.54(t) or that have been added since its issuance.Accordingly, you are requested to assure that your provisions for carrying out an independent audit of your energnecy preparedness program is in accordance with 1U CFR 50.54(t).

If your Technical Specifications contain a provision that is less frequent than the regulations, you should request the staff to modify your technical specifications to conform to the rule.Because this Technical Specification is clarifying and made at the request of the Coizission, you are not required to remit a license fee for the change.This request has been approved by 01tB Clearance Nuvnber 3150-0011, wihich expires April 3J, 1985.oxtoLX(tJ.'

&L; Jl-9 8210040068

  • SEE PREVIOUS TISSUES FOR CONCURRENCE

Powtr Sirereflbhi signedby'DarrellG

Q- 1enhut Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing g -....OFFICEO SURNAME b DATE DL: ORb #5 ' OELD*....9 7/.................8

?.A/?? ..QnQ.x.S. .0.l.. v ..t.e~........

DL: ORB #5* LFMB*......................

...... ...........

I... .........DCrutchfi .l 9/10/82 9/16/82........................

.............

..................

DL: AD/SA*........................

ENW 19.r.sl .......9/23/82........................

I DL:... .............

gl. e n hul .......r.............

I_ _I1 NRC FORM 318 (10-80) NRCM 0240 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY USGPO: 1981-335-960

TO ALL LICENSEE OF OPERATING

POWER REACTORS Gentlemen:

SUBJECT: INCONSISTENCY

BETWEEN REQUIREMENTS

OF lO CFR 50.54(t)AND STANDARD TECNNICAL

SPECIFICATIONS

FOR PERFORMING

AUDITS OF EMERGENCY

PREPAREDNESS

PROGRAMS (Generic Letter No. 82- )Section 50.54(t) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations requires that each nuclear power reactor licensee provide for an independent review of its emergency preparedness prograi at least every 12 months.It has come to our attention that the Standard Technical Specifications in use by a number of licensees and some existing plant-specific Technical Specifications require that this Inde-pendent audit be carried out every 24 months.All licensees are required to meet the requirements of 10 CFR 50.54(t), notwithstanding any provision that may have been in their Technical Specification prior to the issuance of 10 CFR 50.54(t) or that have been added since its issuance.Accordingly, you are requested to assure that your provisions for carrying out an Independent audit of your emergency prepared-ness program is in accordance with 10 CFR 50.54(t).

If your Technical Specifications contain a provision that Is less !frequent than the regulations, you should request the staff to modify your technical specifications to conform to the rule.8ecause this Technical Specification is clarifying and made at the request of the Commission, you are not required to remit a license fee for the change.Sincerely, Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing*SEE PREVIOUS TISSUE FOR CONCURRENCE

___ DL: ORB #5 OELD* Dg#5 MB D D/SA DL: DIR OFFICE~ .. ...................

... .........

....... ... t ki-----r----tt-*--s r-----......

.. ........................

........................

SURNAME P.Q ..Qnn.Q.;Uj.I

.Qm .ff atA.........P

.DC FMi r ia DEisenhut DA T E ..l2 9./7..8.2

... ..... ....2 ..L82 8 2 / /82 J....DAC F_.._......

.....R..FA.. ... Y .... ...... .. ... ....NRC FORMG 318 (10-80) NRCM 0240 O FFICIA L RECUOR D C OPY USGPO: 1981-335-ME

TO'ALL LICENSEE OF OPERATING

POWER REACTORS Gentlemen:

SUBJECT: INCONSISTENCY

BETWEEN REQUIREMIENTS

OF 10 CFR 50.54(t)AND STANDARD TECHNICAL

SPECIFICATIONS

FOR PERFORMING

AUDITS OF EMERGENCY

PREPAREDNESS

PROGRAMS (Generic Letter No. 82- )Section 50.54(t) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations requires that each nuclear power reactor licensee provide for q an independent review of at least every 12 months.It has come to our attention that the Standard Technical Specifications in use by a number of licensees and some existing plant-specific Technical Specifications require that this inde-pendent audit be carried out every 24 months.All licensees are required to meet the requirements of 10 CFR 50.54(t), nof iithstanding any provision that may have been in.their Technical Specification prior to the issuance of 10 CFR 50.54(t) or that have been added since its issuance.Accordingly, you are requested to assure that your provisions for carrying out an independent audit of your emergency prepared-ness program is in accordance with 10 CFR 50.54(t).

If your Technical Specifications contain a provision that is lessAthan-QQ6i-e regulations, you should request the staff to modify your D A technical specifications to the rule. ;t5 Because this Technical Specificato°

of the Conmission, you -qfibtred to remit a license fee for the charge.a{ (AI Sincerely, Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing ,_ ,,_- ,§l .,I r OFFICEDL:

DL: ORB #5 FMB DL: A/AD/SA DL: DIR..............

.........t. .. ........................

....... .................

... ...... *...............

.....................

........................

SURNAMEO ..B.¶Onn/.;..

...2. _ ...f1 ....TlJ8........8.2.....

T 11.8.2 ..... O.n8hu.2 ........................

DATEt ..... .17/8 1..... ...!. ...../. /*n .... ../.~.../ ... ./ .................

NRC FORM 318 (10-80) NRCM 0240 O FFICIA L R EC O RD C OPY.USGPO: 1981l 3960

Template:GL-Nav