|
|
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
| Line 3: |
Line 3: |
| | issue date = 01/27/2015 | | | issue date = 01/27/2015 |
| | title = Court Order Granting Exelon Motion to Intervene - 1-27-15 - DC Cir 14-1225 - NRDC V NRC | | | title = Court Order Granting Exelon Motion to Intervene - 1-27-15 - DC Cir 14-1225 - NRDC V NRC |
| | author name = Langer M J, Yacisin A | | | author name = Langer M, Yacisin A |
| | author affiliation = US Federal Judiciary, US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit | | | author affiliation = US Federal Judiciary, US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit |
| | addressee name = | | | addressee name = |
| Line 16: |
Line 16: |
|
| |
|
| =Text= | | =Text= |
| {{#Wiki_filter:United States Court of AppealsFOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT____________No. 14-1225September Term, 2014NRC-50-352-LRNRC-79FR63650Filed On: January 27, 2015 [1534266]Natural Resources Defense Council, Petitionerv.U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission andUnited States of America, Respondents------------------------------Exelon Generation Company, LLC, IntervenorO R D E RUpon consideration of the motion for leave to intervene filed by:Exelon Generation Company, LLC,it is ORDERED that the motion be granted.Circuit Rules 28(d) and 32(a)(2) govern the filing of briefs by intervenors. A schedule forthe filing of briefs will be established by future order. That order will automatically provide briefingonly for intervenors on the side of respondents. Any intervenor(s) intending to participate insupport of petitioner must so notify the court, in writing, within 14 days of the date of this order.Such notification must include a statement of the issues to be raised by the intervenor(s). Thisnotification will allow tailoring of the briefing schedule to provide time for a brief as intervenor onthe side of petitioner. Failure to submit notification could result in an intervenor being denied leaveto file a brief.Intervenors supporting the same party are reminded that they must file a joint brief orcertify to the court why a separate brief is necessary. Intervenors' attention is particularly directedto D.C. Circuit Handbook of Practice and Internal Procedures 38-39 (2013), which describes"unacceptable" grounds for filing separate briefs. Failure to comply with this order may result inthe imposition of sanctions. See D.C. Cir. Rule 38.FOR THE COURT:Mark J. Langer, ClerkBY:/s/Amy YacisinDeputy ClerkUSCA Case #14-1225 Document #1534266 Filed: 01/27/2015 Page 1 of 1}} | | {{#Wiki_filter:USCA Case #14-1225 Document #1534266 Filed: 01/27/2015 Page 1 of 1 United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT No. 14-1225 September Term, 2014 NRC-50-352-LR NRC-79FR63650 Filed On: January 27, 2015 [1534266] |
| | Natural Resources Defense Council, Petitioner v. |
| | U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and United States of America, Respondents Exelon Generation Company, LLC, Intervenor ORDER Upon consideration of the motion for leave to intervene filed by: |
| | Exelon Generation Company, LLC, it is ORDERED that the motion be granted. |
| | Circuit Rules 28(d) and 32(a)(2) govern the filing of briefs by intervenors. A schedule for the filing of briefs will be established by future order. That order will automatically provide briefing only for intervenors on the side of respondents. Any intervenor(s) intending to participate in support of petitioner must so notify the court, in writing, within 14 days of the date of this order. |
| | Such notification must include a statement of the issues to be raised by the intervenor(s). This notification will allow tailoring of the briefing schedule to provide time for a brief as intervenor on the side of petitioner. Failure to submit notification could result in an intervenor being denied leave to file a brief. |
| | Intervenors supporting the same party are reminded that they must file a joint brief or certify to the court why a separate brief is necessary. Intervenors' attention is particularly directed to D.C. Circuit Handbook of Practice and Internal Procedures 38-39 (2013), which describes "unacceptable" grounds for filing separate briefs. Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions. See D.C. Cir. Rule 38. |
| | FOR THE COURT: |
| | Mark J. Langer, Clerk BY: /s/ |
| | Amy Yacisin Deputy Clerk}} |
|
|---|
Category:Legal-Order
MONTHYEARML22045A4782022-02-14014 February 2022
Commission Memorandum and Order (CLI-22-01)
ML21280A3622021-10-0707 October 2021
Order (Granting Joint Motion for the Issuance of a Third Amendment to the Protective Order)
ML21187A2852021-07-0606 July 2021
Order (Granting Combined Motions to Extend Deadlines to Answer Hearing Requests)
ML21180A4212021-06-29029 June 2021
Order (Providing Second Amended Protective Order and Establishing Hearing Request Deadline for the State of Illinois)
ML21173A2992021-06-22022 June 2021
Order (Stay of Hearing Request Deadline for the State of Illinois)
ML21168A3302021-06-17017 June 2021
Exhibit B - Order
ML21165A1242021-06-14014 June 2021
Order (Granting Extension of Time for the Environmental Law and Policy Center, and State of Illinois)
ML21168A3292021-06-0909 June 2021
Exhibit a - Order
ML21160A2312021-06-0909 June 2021
Order (Granting Joint Motion to Amend Protective Order)
ML21144A1252021-05-24024 May 2021
Order (Granting Motion to Extend Hearing Requests Deadline)
ML21139A3252021-05-19019 May 2021
(Corrected) Order (Granting Joint Motion for Entry of a Protective Order)
ML21137A3142021-05-17017 May 2021
Order (Granting Joint Motion for Entry of a Protective Order)
ML15217A6162015-07-21021 July 2015
Clerk Order Setting Oral Argument Date
ML15027A2062015-01-27027 January 2015
Court Order Granting Exelon Motion to Intervene - 1-27-15 - DC Cir 14-1225 - NRDC V NRC
ML14338A3172014-12-0404 December 2014
Notice and Order (Scheduling Oral Argument), in the Matter of Diablo Canyon, Units 1 and 2
ML14238A2152014-08-26026 August 2014
Commission Memorandum and Order (CLI-14-08)
ML14174B2052014-06-23023 June 2014
Notice of Official Site Visit of Commissioner William C. Ostendorff on June 24, 2014 at Limerick Station
ML13322B2572013-11-18018 November 2013
Order Denying Exelon'S Petition for Certification of Waste Confidence-Related Question to the Commission
ML13317B2252013-11-13013 November 2013
Order (Suspending Answers from Parties)
ML13304B4172013-10-31031 October 2013
Memorandum and Order (CLI-13-07)
ML13290A4662013-10-17017 October 2013
Notice of the Secretary Lifting Suspension of Adjudicatory Activity in the Matter of Limerick, Units 1 and 2
ML13283A1122013-10-10010 October 2013
Notice of the Secretary Regarding Agency Shutdown
ML13218A2972013-08-0606 August 2013
Memorandum (Clarifying the Board'S July 12, 2013 Order)
ML13193A0502013-07-12012 July 2013
Memorandum and Order (Ruling on Resubmission of Contentions)
ML13057A8222013-02-26026 February 2013
Order of the Secretary Granting Motion Requesting Briefing and Establishing Briefing Schedule
ML13037A4772013-02-0606 February 2013
Order (Denying Petition for Waiver of 10 C.F.R. 51.53(c)(3)(ii)(L) and Referring This Decision to the Commission) - LBP-13-01
ML12332A2592012-11-27027 November 2012
Order - Establishing Deadlines for Response to NRDC Waiver Petition
ML12297A1032012-10-23023 October 2012
Commission Memorandum and Order (CLI-12-19) Reversing the Board'S Decision Granting Nrdc'S Intervention Petition
ML12248A1952012-09-0404 September 2012
Revised Scheduling Order in the Matter of Limerick, Units 1 and 2
ML12235A2652012-08-22022 August 2012
Notice - (Advising Parties of Amendments to 10 C.F.R. Part 2)
ML12221A2772012-08-0808 August 2012
Order (Suspending Procedural Date Related to Proposed Waste Confidence Contention)
ML12220A1002012-08-0707 August 2012
Commission Memorandum and Order (CLI-12-16) to Suspend Final Licensing Decisions, to Grant the Requests in Part and Deny the Requests in Part
ML12128A2952012-05-0707 May 2012
Initial Scheduling Order
ML12124A1892012-05-0303 May 2012
Notice of Hearing
ML12107A1402012-04-16016 April 2012
Notice and Order (Setting Telephonic Initial Scheduling Conference)
ML12095A2392012-04-0404 April 2012
Memorandum and Order LBP-12-08 (Ruling on Petition to Intervene and Request for Hearing)
ML12073A2442012-03-13013 March 2012
Order (Adopting Proposed Transcript Corrections)
ML12031A2062012-01-31031 January 2012
Notice and Order (Scheduling Oral Argument)
ML11356A1222011-12-22022 December 2011
Order (Granting Motion for Extension of Time)
ML11349A4332011-12-15015 December 2011
Establishment of Atomic Safety and Licensing Board
ML11348A2592011-12-14014 December 2011
Referral Memorandum of the Secretary Request for Hearing with Respect to Renewal of Facility Operating License for an Additional 20 Year Period, Exelon Generation Company, LLC, Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 and 2
ML11290A2332011-10-17017 October 2011
Order Granting NRDC an Ext. of 30 Days to File a Petition to Intervene Regarding License Renewal of Limerick, Units 1 and 2
2022-02-14
[Table view] |
Text
USCA Case #14-1225 Document #1534266 Filed: 01/27/2015 Page 1 of 1 United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT No. 14-1225 September Term, 2014 NRC-50-352-LR NRC-79FR63650 Filed On: January 27, 2015 [1534266]
Natural Resources Defense Council, Petitioner v.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and United States of America, Respondents Exelon Generation Company, LLC, Intervenor ORDER Upon consideration of the motion for leave to intervene filed by:
Exelon Generation Company, LLC, it is ORDERED that the motion be granted.
Circuit Rules 28(d) and 32(a)(2) govern the filing of briefs by intervenors. A schedule for the filing of briefs will be established by future order. That order will automatically provide briefing only for intervenors on the side of respondents. Any intervenor(s) intending to participate in support of petitioner must so notify the court, in writing, within 14 days of the date of this order.
Such notification must include a statement of the issues to be raised by the intervenor(s). This notification will allow tailoring of the briefing schedule to provide time for a brief as intervenor on the side of petitioner. Failure to submit notification could result in an intervenor being denied leave to file a brief.
Intervenors supporting the same party are reminded that they must file a joint brief or certify to the court why a separate brief is necessary. Intervenors' attention is particularly directed to D.C. Circuit Handbook of Practice and Internal Procedures 38-39 (2013), which describes "unacceptable" grounds for filing separate briefs. Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions. See D.C. Cir. Rule 38.
FOR THE COURT:
Mark J. Langer, Clerk BY: /s/
Amy Yacisin Deputy Clerk
