NRC Generic Letter 1987-03: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| issue date = 02/27/1987 | | issue date = 02/27/1987 | ||
| title = NRC Generic Letter 1987-003: Verification of Seismic Adequacy of Mechanical and Electrical Equipment in Operating Reactors, Unresolved Safety Issue (USI) A-46 | | title = NRC Generic Letter 1987-003: Verification of Seismic Adequacy of Mechanical and Electrical Equipment in Operating Reactors, Unresolved Safety Issue (USI) A-46 | ||
| author name = Denton H | | author name = Denton H | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR | | author affiliation = NRC/NRR | ||
| addressee name = | | addressee name = | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| page count = 6 | | page count = 6 | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED | {{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES | ||
.r ._ _, | NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION | ||
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 | |||
'FEB 2 7 1987 TO: -All Licensees, Applicants and Holders of Operating Licenses Not Required to be Reviewed for Seismic Adequacy of Equipment Under the Provisions of USI A-46, "Seismic -Qualification of Equipment:in Operating Plants" | |||
GENTLEMEN:-' | |||
SUBJECT: VERIFICATION OF SEISMIC ADEQUACY OF MECHANICAL AND | |||
ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT IN OPERATING REACTORS, UNRESOLVED | |||
SAFETY ISSUE (USI) A-46 (Generic Letter 87-03) | |||
As a result of the technical resolution of USI A-46, "9Seismic Qualification of Equipment in Operating Plants," the NRC has concluded that the seismic adequacy of certain equipment in those operating nuclear power plants which have not previously been reviewed to current licensing requirements for seismic qualification must be reviewed to seismic criteria defined in the USI A-46 technical resolution. The USI A-46 developed procedures make use of earthquake experience data supplemented by test data to verify the seismic capability of equipment below specified earthquake motion bounds. In the staff's K | |||
Judgment, this approach is the most reasonable and cost-effective means of ensuring that tWe purpose df GeneraT DesignCriteFTon-7 (10 Cr Part Du- - | |||
Appendix A) is met for these plants. | |||
Because affected plants are being asked to carry out this evaluation against criteria not used to establish the design basis of the facility, this resolution is a backfit under 10 CFR 50.109. The backfit analysis and -t findings may be found in the USI A-46 Regulatory Analysis (NUREG 1211) at pp. 31. | |||
We have documented evidence in staff SERs that your plant either has been, I | |||
or is required to be, reviewed to current licensing requirements for Seismic Qualification of Equipment (i.e., SRP-3.10, IEEE-344/75 and Regulatory Guide 1.100) and therefore you are inot required to respond to this letter or to perform the plant reviews described in the enclosures. | |||
The information developed in resolving USI A-46 is described in the enclosures to this letter and is being provided to you for information only. | |||
We would also like to call to your attention several recent incidents reported in Licensee Event Reports (LERs) which involved inadequate or missing anchorage. | |||
Between late March 1986 and May 1986, three LERs were received that documented inadequate seismic anchorage of electrical equipment in operating nuclear power plants. The initial case was at the Davis-Besse 1 plant (LER 86-011) | |||
where cabinet doors on Cyberex Class 1E equipment for essential instrument 120 | |||
aLTI5 | |||
, 870C | |||
CARtD | |||
of ao:o oc'53 | |||
p0 | |||
-2- YAC power were found to lack the required door bolts. The second LER concerned emergency diesel generator switchgear cabinets at the Cooper plant that were not fastened to embedded channels beneath the cabinets (LER 86-009). The third deficiency was found at the Dresden 2 and 3 plants, where it was determined that the control room control panels did not have positive anchorage to the floor (LER 86-009). In each instance, the deficiency had existed since plant construction and was the-result of Installation errors, since the design drawings had specified seismic anchorage.. As a consequence of these events, a review was initiated by the NRC Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data (AEOD). This review included an LER search which revealed four other instances of inadequate seismic anchorage or support of safety | |||
1 related electrical equipment plus other related seismic inadequacies. | |||
I | |||
We are enclosing the regulatory a'naysis (NURE& 1211) and the USI A-46 technical findings (NUREG1030) for your information. The generic letter, which was issued to each nuclear plant that is required to perform seismic adequacy reviews under the provisions of USI A-46, is included as Appendix A | |||
to NUREG-1211; | |||
Sincerely, A | |||
T | |||
.. , I | |||
L II | |||
Harold R. Denton, Di Office ul ear_2R RegulationI | |||
Enclosures: | |||
L NUREG 1211; | |||
2. NUREG 1030 | |||
. I -. . i. | |||
cc: Service List':i k ,.I | |||
I | |||
I | |||
I . | |||
. I | |||
. r. | |||
_ _, A | |||
LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED GENERIC LETTERS ' i " | |||
Generic Date of Letter No. Subject I ssuance Issued To GL 87-02 - VERIFICATION OF SEISMIC 02/19/87 ALL HOLDERS OF | |||
: | |||
ADEQUACY OF MECHANICAL AND OPERATING | |||
', ,I | |||
ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT IN LICENSES NOT | |||
OPERATING REACTORS CUSI A-46) REVIEWED TO | |||
CURRENT | |||
LICENSING | |||
CRITERIA ON | |||
4A ' | |||
SEISMIC | |||
QUALIFICATION | |||
OF EQUIPMENT | |||
GL 87-01 PUBLIC AVAILABILITY OF THE NRC 01/08/87 ALL POWER | |||
OPERATOR LICENSING EXAMINATION REACTOR | |||
QUESTION BANK LICENSEES AND | |||
APPLICANTS FOR | |||
AN OPERATING | |||
LICENSE | |||
GL 86-17 AVAILABILITY OF NUREG-11699 1017/m6 ALL LICENSEES - 4- | |||
"TECHNICAL FINDINGS RELATED TO OF BOILING . | |||
GENERIC ISSUE C-B WATER REACTORS : -,. | |||
BWR MSIC LEAKAGE AND LEAKAGE I-' | |||
CONTROL SYSTEM | |||
GL 86-16 WESTINGHOUSE ECCS EVALUATION 10/22/e6 ALL | |||
MODELS PRESSURIZED | |||
WATER REACTOR | |||
APPLICANTS AND | |||
LICENSEES | |||
GL 66-15 INFORMATION RELATING TO ALL LICENSEES. | |||
COMPLIANCE WITH 10 CFR 50.49, AND HOLDERS OF | |||
"EQ OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT AN APPLICATION | |||
IMPORTANI TO SAFETY" FOR AN | |||
OPERATING | |||
LICENSE * | |||
GL 86-14 OPERATOR LICENSING 08/20/86 ALL POWER -- F | |||
EXAMINATIONS REACTOR | |||
LICENSEES AND- | |||
APPLICANTS | |||
GL 86-13 POTENTIAL INCONSISTENCY 07/23/86 ALL POWER | |||
BETWEEN PLANT SAFETY ANALYSES REACTOR | |||
AND TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS LICENSEES WITH | |||
CE AND B&W | |||
PRESSURIZED | |||
WATER REACTORS | |||
6L 86-12 CRITERIA FOR UNIQUE | |||
==PURPOSE== | ==PURPOSE== | ||
EXEMPTION FROM CONVERSION | 07/03/e6 ALL NON-POWER | ||
VAC power were found to lack the required door bolts. The second LER | EXEMPTION FROM CONVERSION FROM REACTOR | ||
The second LER concerned emergency diesel generator switchgear cabinets | THE USE OF HEU FUEL LICENSEES | ||
S | AUTHORIZED TO | ||
}} | USE HEU FUEL | ||
VAC power were found to lack the required door bolts. The second LER concerned emergency diesel generator switchgear cabinets at the Cooper plant that were not fastened to embedded channels beneath the cabinets (LER 86-009). The third deficiency was found at the Dresden 2 and 3 plants, where it was determined that the control room control panels did not have positive anchorage to the floor (LER 86-009). In each Instance, the deficiency had existed since plant construction and was the result of installation errors, since the design drawings had specified seismic anchorage. As a consequence of these events, a review was initiated by the NRC Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data (AEOD). This review included an LER search which revealed four other instances of inadequate seismic anchorage or support of safety related electrical equipment plus other related seismic inadequacies. | |||
We are enclosing the regulatory analysis (NUREG 1211) and the USI A-46 technical findings (NUREG 1030) for your information. The generic letter, which was issued to each nuclear plant that is required to perform seismic adequacy reviews under the provisions of USI A-46, is included as Appendix A | |||
to NUREG-1211. | |||
Sincerely, Harol R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Enclosures: | |||
1. NUREG 1211 | |||
2. NUREG 1030 | |||
cc: Service List Distribution: | |||
Central File DSRO Chron File K | |||
EIB Reading File 8703060307 H. Denton R. Vollmer A | |||
F. Hebdon S. Rubin T. Speis B. Sheron R. Bosnak N. Anderson T. Y. Chang | |||
(* see previous concurrence) | |||
OFC :EIB:DSR0,*> EIB:DSRO :EIB:DSRO :DD:DSRO :D:DSRO :DDfiRR | |||
NAMIE :*TChang/vt :*NAnderson/ :*RBosnak :*BSheron :*TSpeis :R er DATE 3/6 /87 :3/ /87 :3/ /87 :3/ /87 :3/ /87 --- - 87 * | |||
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY | |||
The second LER concerned emergency diesel generator switchgear cabinets at the Cooper plant that were not fastened to embedded channels beneath the cabinets (LER 86-009). The third deficiency was found at the Dresden 2 and 3 plants, where It was determined that the control room control panels did not have positive anchorage to the floor (LER 86-009). In each instance, the deficiency had existed since plant construction and was the result of installation errors, since the design drawings had specified seismic anchorage. As a consequence of these events, a review was initiated by the NRC Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data (AEOD). This review included an LER search which revealed four other instances of inadequate seismic anchorage or support of safety related electrical equipment plus other related seismic inadequacies. This information is documented in AEOD report "Seismic Anchors for Electrical and Control Panels" (AEOD/E611). | |||
We are enclosing the generic letter which was issued to each nuclear plant that is required to perform seismic adequacy reviews under the provisions of USI A-46, the regulatory analysis (NUREG 1211) and the USI A-46 Technical Findings (NUREG 1030) for your information. | |||
Sincerely, Orifinal Signed 8hy richard H.Vollmer Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Enclosures: | |||
1. Generic Letter | |||
2. NUREG 1211 | |||
3. NUREG 1030 | |||
cc: Service List Distribution: | |||
Central Fi S. Rubin DSRO Chron File T. Speis EIB Reading File B. Sheron H. Denton R. Bosnak R. Vollmer N. Anderson F. Hebdon T. Y. Chang | |||
(* see previous concurrence) | |||
OFC :EIB:DSRO :EIB:DSRO :DD:DSRO :D:DSRO :DD:WRRI zD: | |||
------------ | |||
___:------------: ------------ :- :----i:------ ------_____ | |||
NAME :NAnderson/dw* RBosnak* :BSheron* :TSpeis* :RYV r :HD~tit n : | |||
_____ __ _________ ________ ___ _. -------- :-- ----------- | |||
DATE :2/ /87 :2/ /87 :2/ /87 :2/ /87 :2t /87 :2/2(/87 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY | |||
y S - aS | |||
- -I | |||
VAC power were found to lack the required door bolts. The second LER concerned emergency diesel generator switchgear cabinets at the Cooper plant that were not fastened to embedded channels beneath the cabinets (LER 86-009). The third deficiency was found at the Dresden 2 and 3 plants, where it was determined that the control room control panels did not have positive anchorage to the floor (LER 86-009). In each instance, the deficiency had existed since plant construction and was the result of installation errors, since the design drawings had specified seismic anchorage. As a consequence of these events, a review was initiated by the NRC Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data (AEOD). This review included an LER search which revealed four other instances of inadequate seismic anchorage or support of safety related electrical equipment plus other related seismic inadequacies. | |||
We are enclosing the generic letter which was issued to each nuclear plant that is required to perform seismic adequacy reviews under the provisions of USI A-46, the regulatory analysis (NUREG 1211) and the USI A-46 Technical Findings (NUREG 1030) for your information. | |||
Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Enclosures: | |||
1. Generic Letter | |||
2. NUREG 1211 | |||
3. NUREG 1030 | |||
cc: Service List Distribution: | |||
Central File DSRO Chron File EIB Reading File H. Denton R. Vollmer F. Hebdon S. Rubin T. Speis B. Sheron R. Bosnak N. Anderson T. Y. Chang OFC :EIB:DSRO :EIB:DSi DD: :D: D :DD:NRR :D:NRR | |||
- - - - ------ ----- ----------- | |||
NAME :NAnders / w RBosn -:B eron : peis :RVollmer :HDenton | |||
____ ------- | |||
_______ --- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ------------ ----- | |||
DATE :2/#3 /87 :2//Ig7 | |||
& :2/L187 1 2/l 87 :2/ /87 :2/ /87 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY}} | |||
{{GL-Nav}} | {{GL-Nav}} | ||
Latest revision as of 02:57, 24 November 2019
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
'FEB 2 7 1987 TO: -All Licensees, Applicants and Holders of Operating Licenses Not Required to be Reviewed for Seismic Adequacy of Equipment Under the Provisions of USI A-46, "Seismic -Qualification of Equipment:in Operating Plants"
GENTLEMEN:-'
SUBJECT: VERIFICATION OF SEISMIC ADEQUACY OF MECHANICAL AND
ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT IN OPERATING REACTORS, UNRESOLVED
SAFETY ISSUE (USI) A-46 (Generic Letter 87-03)
As a result of the technical resolution of USI A-46, "9Seismic Qualification of Equipment in Operating Plants," the NRC has concluded that the seismic adequacy of certain equipment in those operating nuclear power plants which have not previously been reviewed to current licensing requirements for seismic qualification must be reviewed to seismic criteria defined in the USI A-46 technical resolution. The USI A-46 developed procedures make use of earthquake experience data supplemented by test data to verify the seismic capability of equipment below specified earthquake motion bounds. In the staff's K
Judgment, this approach is the most reasonable and cost-effective means of ensuring that tWe purpose df GeneraT DesignCriteFTon-7 (10 Cr Part Du- -
Appendix A) is met for these plants.
Because affected plants are being asked to carry out this evaluation against criteria not used to establish the design basis of the facility, this resolution is a backfit under 10 CFR 50.109. The backfit analysis and -t findings may be found in the USI A-46 Regulatory Analysis (NUREG 1211) at pp. 31.
We have documented evidence in staff SERs that your plant either has been, I
or is required to be, reviewed to current licensing requirements for Seismic Qualification of Equipment (i.e., SRP-3.10, IEEE-344/75 and Regulatory Guide 1.100) and therefore you are inot required to respond to this letter or to perform the plant reviews described in the enclosures.
The information developed in resolving USI A-46 is described in the enclosures to this letter and is being provided to you for information only.
We would also like to call to your attention several recent incidents reported in Licensee Event Reports (LERs) which involved inadequate or missing anchorage.
Between late March 1986 and May 1986, three LERs were received that documented inadequate seismic anchorage of electrical equipment in operating nuclear power plants. The initial case was at the Davis-Besse 1 plant (LER 86-011)
where cabinet doors on Cyberex Class 1E equipment for essential instrument 120
aLTI5
, 870C
CARtD
of ao:o oc'53
p0
-2- YAC power were found to lack the required door bolts. The second LER concerned emergency diesel generator switchgear cabinets at the Cooper plant that were not fastened to embedded channels beneath the cabinets (LER 86-009). The third deficiency was found at the Dresden 2 and 3 plants, where it was determined that the control room control panels did not have positive anchorage to the floor (LER 86-009). In each instance, the deficiency had existed since plant construction and was the-result of Installation errors, since the design drawings had specified seismic anchorage.. As a consequence of these events, a review was initiated by the NRC Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data (AEOD). This review included an LER search which revealed four other instances of inadequate seismic anchorage or support of safety
1 related electrical equipment plus other related seismic inadequacies.
I
We are enclosing the regulatory a'naysis (NURE& 1211) and the USI A-46 technical findings (NUREG1030) for your information. The generic letter, which was issued to each nuclear plant that is required to perform seismic adequacy reviews under the provisions of USI A-46, is included as Appendix A
to NUREG-1211;
Sincerely, A
T
.. , I
L II
Harold R. Denton, Di Office ul ear_2R RegulationI
Enclosures:
L NUREG 1211;
2. NUREG 1030
. I -. . i.
cc: Service List':i k ,.I
I
I
I .
. I
. r.
_ _, A
LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED GENERIC LETTERS ' i "
Generic Date of Letter No. Subject I ssuance Issued To GL 87-02 - VERIFICATION OF SEISMIC 02/19/87 ALL HOLDERS OF
ADEQUACY OF MECHANICAL AND OPERATING
', ,I
ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT IN LICENSES NOT
OPERATING REACTORS CUSI A-46) REVIEWED TO
CURRENT
LICENSING
CRITERIA ON
4A '
SEISMIC
QUALIFICATION
OF EQUIPMENT
GL 87-01 PUBLIC AVAILABILITY OF THE NRC 01/08/87 ALL POWER
OPERATOR LICENSING EXAMINATION REACTOR
QUESTION BANK LICENSEES AND
APPLICANTS FOR
AN OPERATING
LICENSE
GL 86-17 AVAILABILITY OF NUREG-11699 1017/m6 ALL LICENSEES - 4-
"TECHNICAL FINDINGS RELATED TO OF BOILING .
GENERIC ISSUE C-B WATER REACTORS : -,.
BWR MSIC LEAKAGE AND LEAKAGE I-'
CONTROL SYSTEM
GL 86-16 WESTINGHOUSE ECCS EVALUATION 10/22/e6 ALL
MODELS PRESSURIZED
WATER REACTOR
APPLICANTS AND
LICENSEES
GL 66-15 INFORMATION RELATING TO ALL LICENSEES.
COMPLIANCE WITH 10 CFR 50.49, AND HOLDERS OF
"EQ OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT AN APPLICATION
IMPORTANI TO SAFETY" FOR AN
OPERATING
LICENSE *
GL 86-14 OPERATOR LICENSING 08/20/86 ALL POWER -- F
EXAMINATIONS REACTOR
LICENSEES AND-
APPLICANTS
GL 86-13 POTENTIAL INCONSISTENCY 07/23/86 ALL POWER
BETWEEN PLANT SAFETY ANALYSES REACTOR
AND TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS LICENSEES WITH
PRESSURIZED
WATER REACTORS
6L 86-12 CRITERIA FOR UNIQUE
PURPOSE
07/03/e6 ALL NON-POWER
EXEMPTION FROM CONVERSION FROM REACTOR
THE USE OF HEU FUEL LICENSEES
AUTHORIZED TO
USE HEU FUEL
VAC power were found to lack the required door bolts. The second LER concerned emergency diesel generator switchgear cabinets at the Cooper plant that were not fastened to embedded channels beneath the cabinets (LER 86-009). The third deficiency was found at the Dresden 2 and 3 plants, where it was determined that the control room control panels did not have positive anchorage to the floor (LER 86-009). In each Instance, the deficiency had existed since plant construction and was the result of installation errors, since the design drawings had specified seismic anchorage. As a consequence of these events, a review was initiated by the NRC Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data (AEOD). This review included an LER search which revealed four other instances of inadequate seismic anchorage or support of safety related electrical equipment plus other related seismic inadequacies.
We are enclosing the regulatory analysis (NUREG 1211) and the USI A-46 technical findings (NUREG 1030) for your information. The generic letter, which was issued to each nuclear plant that is required to perform seismic adequacy reviews under the provisions of USI A-46, is included as Appendix A
to NUREG-1211.
Sincerely, Harol R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Enclosures:
1. NUREG 1211
2. NUREG 1030
cc: Service List Distribution:
Central File DSRO Chron File K
EIB Reading File 8703060307 H. Denton R. Vollmer A
F. Hebdon S. Rubin T. Speis B. Sheron R. Bosnak N. Anderson T. Y. Chang
(* see previous concurrence)
OFC :EIB:DSR0,*> EIB:DSRO :EIB:DSRO :DD:DSRO :D:DSRO :DDfiRR
NAMIE :*TChang/vt :*NAnderson/ :*RBosnak :*BSheron :*TSpeis :R er DATE 3/6 /87 :3/ /87 :3/ /87 :3/ /87 :3/ /87 --- - 87 *
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
The second LER concerned emergency diesel generator switchgear cabinets at the Cooper plant that were not fastened to embedded channels beneath the cabinets (LER 86-009). The third deficiency was found at the Dresden 2 and 3 plants, where It was determined that the control room control panels did not have positive anchorage to the floor (LER 86-009). In each instance, the deficiency had existed since plant construction and was the result of installation errors, since the design drawings had specified seismic anchorage. As a consequence of these events, a review was initiated by the NRC Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data (AEOD). This review included an LER search which revealed four other instances of inadequate seismic anchorage or support of safety related electrical equipment plus other related seismic inadequacies. This information is documented in AEOD report "Seismic Anchors for Electrical and Control Panels" (AEOD/E611).
We are enclosing the generic letter which was issued to each nuclear plant that is required to perform seismic adequacy reviews under the provisions of USI A-46, the regulatory analysis (NUREG 1211) and the USI A-46 Technical Findings (NUREG 1030) for your information.
Sincerely, Orifinal Signed 8hy richard H.Vollmer Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Enclosures:
1. Generic Letter
2. NUREG 1211
3. NUREG 1030
cc: Service List Distribution:
Central Fi S. Rubin DSRO Chron File T. Speis EIB Reading File B. Sheron H. Denton R. Bosnak R. Vollmer N. Anderson F. Hebdon T. Y. Chang
(* see previous concurrence)
OFC :EIB:DSRO :EIB:DSRO :DD:DSRO :D:DSRO :DD:WRRI zD:
___:------------: ------------ :- :----i:------ ------_____
NAME :NAnderson/dw* RBosnak* :BSheron* :TSpeis* :RYV r :HD~tit n :
_____ __ _________ ________ ___ _. -------- :-- -----------
DATE :2/ /87 :2/ /87 :2/ /87 :2/ /87 :2t /87 :2/2(/87 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
y S - aS
- -I
VAC power were found to lack the required door bolts. The second LER concerned emergency diesel generator switchgear cabinets at the Cooper plant that were not fastened to embedded channels beneath the cabinets (LER 86-009). The third deficiency was found at the Dresden 2 and 3 plants, where it was determined that the control room control panels did not have positive anchorage to the floor (LER 86-009). In each instance, the deficiency had existed since plant construction and was the result of installation errors, since the design drawings had specified seismic anchorage. As a consequence of these events, a review was initiated by the NRC Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data (AEOD). This review included an LER search which revealed four other instances of inadequate seismic anchorage or support of safety related electrical equipment plus other related seismic inadequacies.
We are enclosing the generic letter which was issued to each nuclear plant that is required to perform seismic adequacy reviews under the provisions of USI A-46, the regulatory analysis (NUREG 1211) and the USI A-46 Technical Findings (NUREG 1030) for your information.
Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Enclosures:
1. Generic Letter
2. NUREG 1211
3. NUREG 1030
cc: Service List Distribution:
Central File DSRO Chron File EIB Reading File H. Denton R. Vollmer F. Hebdon S. Rubin T. Speis B. Sheron R. Bosnak N. Anderson T. Y. Chang OFC :EIB:DSRO :EIB:DSi DD: :D: D :DD:NRR :D:NRR
- - - - ------ ----- -----------
NAME :NAnders / w RBosn -:B eron : peis :RVollmer :HDenton
____ -------
_______ --- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ------------ -----
DATE :2/#3 /87 :2//Ig7
& :2/L187 1 2/l 87 :2/ /87 :2/ /87 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY