NRC Generic Letter 1986-17: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 10/17/1986
| issue date = 10/17/1986
| title = NRC Generic Letter 1986-017: Availability of NUREG-1169, Technical Findings Related to Generic Issue C-8; Boiling Water Reactor Main Steam Isolation Valve Leakage & Leakage Treatment Methods
| title = NRC Generic Letter 1986-017: Availability of NUREG-1169, Technical Findings Related to Generic Issue C-8; Boiling Water Reactor Main Steam Isolation Valve Leakage & Leakage Treatment Methods
| author name = Bernero R M
| author name = Bernero R
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 14: Line 14:
| page count = 5
| page count = 5
}}
}}
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATESNUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIONWASHINGTON, D. C. 20555OCTi?18TO ALL LICENSEES OF BOILING WATER REACTORS AND APPLICANTSGentlemen:
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES
                          NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
                                    WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 OCTi?18 TO ALL LICENSEES OF BOILING WATER REACTORS AND APPLICANTS
    Gentlemen:
    SUBJECT:  AVAILABILITY OF NUREG-1169, "TECHNICAL FINDINGS RELATED TO
              GENERIC ISSUE C-8; BOILING WATER REACTOR MAIN STEAM ISOLATION
              VALVE LEAKAGE AND LEAKAGE TREATMENT METHODS" (Generic Letter 86-17)
    This letter is to inform you that NUREG-1169, "Technical Findings Related to Generic Issue C-8; Boiling Water Reactor Main Steam Isolation Valve Leakage and Leakage Treatment Methods", was published in June, 1986. This NUREG
    presents the results of the NRC staff and contractor efforts to assess Generic Issue C-8, "MSIV Leakage and LCS Failures". This issue deals with the difficulty of some main steam isolation valves (MSIVs) in Boiling Water Reactors (BWRs) to meet Technical Specification leakage rate limits (which are typically 11.5 SCFH at a 25 psig test pressure) and with the need for leakage control systems. The leakage rates are based on a large loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA), a specified design basis source term from the core (TID 14844),
  the worst single active failure, and no credit for any non-seismic Category I
  equipment, components, and structures. To ensure acceptable performance guidelines for engineered safety features, leakage control systems (LCS) have been installed on most BWRs to direct any leakage past MSIVs during the design basis LOCA to an area served by the Standby Gas Treatment System (SGTS). If the leakage rate past an MSIV significantly exceeds the Technical Specification value, the LCS may not be effective because of limitations in its design.


SUBJECT: AVAILABILITY OF NUREG-1169, "TECHNICAL FINDINGS RELATED TOGENERIC ISSUE C-8; BOILING WATER REACTOR MAIN STEAM ISOLATIONVALVE LEAKAGE AND LEAKAGE TREATMENT METHODS" (Generic Letter 86-17)This letter is to inform you that NUREG-1169, "Technical Findings Related toGeneric Issue C-8; Boiling Water Reactor Main Steam Isolation Valve Leakageand Leakage Treatment Methods", was published in June, 1986. This NUREGpresents the results of the NRC staff and contractor efforts to assess GenericIssue C-8, "MSIV Leakage and LCS Failures". This issue deals with thedifficulty of some main steam isolation valves (MSIVs) in Boiling WaterReactors (BWRs) to meet Technical Specification leakage rate limits (which aretypically 11.5 SCFH at a 25 psig test pressure) and with the need for leakagecontrol systems. The leakage rates are based on a large loss-of-coolantaccident (LOCA), a specified design basis source term from the core (TID 14844),the worst single active failure, and no credit for any non-seismic Category Iequipment, components, and structures. To ensure acceptable performanceguidelines for engineered safety features, leakage control systems (LCS) havebeen installed on most BWRs to direct any leakage past MSIVs during the designbasis LOCA to an area served by the Standby Gas Treatment System (SGTS). Ifthe leakage rate past an MSIV significantly exceeds the Technical Specificationvalue, the LCS may not be effective because of limitations in its design.As a result of these concerns, the staff prioritized the MSIV leakage and LCSfailures as a high priority Generic Issue in January 1983. Independently, theBWR Owners Group (BWROG) formed the MSIV Leakage Control Committee todetermine the cause of high leakage rates associated with many of the MSIVs,and to develop recommendations for reducing the leakage rates. The BWROG-: Committee completed its effort and provided recommendations and comments tothe staff in February, 1984 and April, 1986.In evaluating MSIV leakage with respect to offsite'doses following a LOCA, thetechnical evaluation of this Generic Issue has used realistic assumptionsconcerning the equipment, facilities and site characteristics available tomitigate the effects of a LOCA. The specific elements of the effort were:° To evaluate the BWROG recommendations associated with reducing leakagepast the MSIVs and assess the effectiveness of the recommendations asimplemented by licensees.o To evaluate the existing safety-related LCS comparing it's effectivenesswith that of other methods of handling the leakage likely to beavailable following a LOCA.A4, DOT 1 7 1986o To perform a probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) to evaluate thereliability and relative risks associated with the different methods ofmitigating the effects of a LOCA.° To evaluate the use of alternate equipment to mitigate the effects of aLOCA, and potential changes in allowable MSIV leakage rates.o To identify areas in current licensing guidance (the Regulations, the* Standard Review Plan, the Regulatory Guides, and the TechnicalSpecifications) that are related to MSIVs and LCSs that will beconsidered in the second, or regulatory assessment, phase of resolution.of the generic issue.A safety-related LCS was evaluated by comparing it's effectiveness with othermethods of handling leakage that could be available following a LOCA. Severalways to treat leakage which make.-use of the holdup volume and surfaces of themain steam lines (MSL) and condenser and fission product attenuation elsewhere,were considered. A PRA considering the reliability and relative risks associatedwith the different-methods of mitigating the effects of a LOCA was performed.The overall risks from the accident sequences in which MSYV leakage could be asignificant factor were found to be low without an LCS, and alternate fissionproduct handling techniques were shown to produce significant potential dosereductions.NUREG-1169 represents technical findings associated with Generic Issue C-8 andthe staff expects it tlobe used in the regulatory resolution of the issue. Thelatter is anticipated to be complete in another year in coordination withongoing generic activities relating to accident source terms, to overallcontainment leak rate and leak rate testing considerations.Neither this letter nor NUREG-1169 constitute a change in the existing genericstaff positions or allowable MSIV leakage rates, nor the specifications forMSIV leakage control systems. Therefore, no action is being requested ofapplicants or licensees. The information contained in NUREG-1169, however,including the recommendations of the BWROG, may be useful guidance for somelicensees contemplating plant specific change requests related to this issuepending final generic resolution.NUREG-1169 may be purchased by calling (202) 275-2060 or (202) 275-2171 or bywriting to the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office,Post Office Box Number 37082, Washington, D. C. 20013, or the NationalTechnical Information Service, Department of Commerce, 5258 Port Royal Road,Springfield, Virginia 2216 GOT 17 a-3 -This letter is provided for information only. It does not contain any newrequirements or guidance for licensees of boiling water reactors. Actionsbased on the contents provided herein are voluntary and no reply to the NRC isrequired.
As a result of these concerns, the staff prioritized the MSIV leakage and LCS
  failures as a high priority Generic Issue in January 1983. Independently, the BWR Owners Group (BWROG) formed the MSIV Leakage Control Committee to determine the cause of high leakage rates associated with many of the MSIVs, and to develop recommendations for reducing the leakage rates. The BWROG
-: Committee completed its effort and provided recommendations and comments to the staff in February, 1984 and April, 1986.


Sincerely,Acb~ertXb rRobert M. Bernero, DirectorDivision of BWR LicensingOffice of Nuclear Reactor RegulationOFC : PSB:DBL PSB:DBL AW A:R .BWRye .b--------:------------ --- N f --:- ----- -----NAME :JRidgely:ye : iman :G nas : TSpeis : RBerero ::E ------------ ------/ ------------8------------ ---------DATE :IV/lv/86 :10 3 /86 :{V/ L/6 :f//6 :fr 8OFFICIAL RECORD COPY LIST L. RECENTLY ISSUED GENERIC LTERSGenericLetter No.SubjectDate ofIssuanceGL 86-16 WESTINGHOUSE ECCS EVALUATIONMODELS10/22/86Issued ToALLPRESSURIZEDWATER REACTORAPPLICANTS ANDLICENSEES6L 86-156L 86-14INFORMATION RELATING TOCOMPLIANCE WITH 10 CFR 50.49,"EQ OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENTIMPORTANT TO SAFETY"OPERATOR LICENSINGEXAMINATIONS09/22/8608/20/86ALL LICENSEESAND HOLDERS OFAN APPLICATIONFOR ANOPERATINGLICENSEALL POWERREACTORLICENSEES ANDAPPLICANTSGL 66-13 POTENTIAL INCONSISTENCYBETWEEN PLANT SAFETY ANALYSESAND TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONSOL 86-12 CRITERIA FOR UNIQUE  
In evaluating MSIV leakage with respect to offsite'doses following a LOCA, the technical evaluation of this Generic Issue has used realistic assumptions concerning the equipment, facilities and site characteristics available to mitigate the effects of a LOCA. The specific elements of the effort were:
        ° To evaluate the BWROG recommendations associated with reducing leakage past the MSIVs and assess the effectiveness of the recommendations as implemented by licensees.
 
o To evaluate the existing safety-related LCS comparing it's effectiveness with that of other methods of handling the leakage likely to be available following a LOCA.
 
A4,
 
DOT 1 7 1986 o To perform a probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) to evaluate the reliability and relative risks associated with the different methods of mitigating the effects of a LOCA.
 
° To evaluate the use of alternate equipment to mitigate the effects of a LOCA, and potential changes in allowable MSIV leakage rates.
 
o To identify areas in current licensing guidance (the Regulations, the
 
* Standard Review Plan, the Regulatory Guides, and the Technical Specifications) that are related to MSIVs and LCSs that will be considered inthe second, or regulatory assessment, phase of resolution.
 
of the generic issue.
 
A safety-related LCS was evaluated by comparing it's effectiveness with other methods of handling leakage that could be available following a LOCA. Several ways to treat leakage which make.-use of the holdup volume and surfaces of the main steam lines (MSL) and condenser and fission product attenuation elsewhere, were considered. A PRA considering the reliability and relative risks associated with the different-methods of mitigating the effects of a LOCA was performed.
 
The overall risks from the accident sequences inwhich MSYV leakage could be a significant factor were found to be low without an LCS, and alternate fission product handling techniques were shown to produce significant potential dose reductions.
 
NUREG-1169 represents technical findings associated with Generic Issue C-8 and the staff expects it tlobe used in the regulatory resolution of the issue. The latter is anticipated to be complete inanother year incoordination with ongoing generic activities relating to accident source terms, to overall containment leak rate and leak rate testing considerations.
 
Neither this letter nor NUREG-1169 constitute a change inthe existing generic staff positions or allowable MSIV leakage rates, nor the specifications for MSIV leakage control systems. Therefore, no action is being requested of applicants or licensees. The information contained in NUREG-1169, however, including the recommendations of the BWROG, may be useful guidance for some licensees contemplating plant specific change requests related to this issue pending final generic resolution.
 
NUREG-1169 may be purchased by calling (202) 275-2060 or (202) 275-2171 or by writing to the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Post Office Box Number 37082, Washington, D. C. 20013, or the National Technical Information Service, Department of Commerce, 5258 Port Royal Road, Springfield, Virginia 22161.                                                    I
 
GOT 17a
                                                                -3- This letter is provided for information only. It does not contain any new requirements or guidance for licensees of boiling water reactors. Actions based on the contents provided herein are voluntary and no reply to the NRC is required.
 
Sincerely, Acb~ertXb     r Robert M. Bernero, Director Division of BWR Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation OFC  : PSB:DBL       PSB:DBL       A:R
                                    AW                                        .BWR
                    ye  .               b--------:------------               ---     N f --:- ----- -----
NAME :JRidgely:ye :       iman   :G       nas             : TSpeis       : RBerero         ::
    E ------------
DATE :IV/lv/86    :10 3 /86
                            ------
                            /
                                  :{V/  L/6    8------------   ------------
                                                            :f//6          :fr        8
                                                                                                      ---------
          OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
 
LIST L. RECENTLY ISSUED GENERIC L  TERS
Generic                                      Date of Letter No. Subject                          Issuance    Issued To GL  86-16 WESTINGHOUSE ECCS EVALUATION    10/22/86   ALL
            MODELS                                      PRESSURIZED
                                                          WATER REACTOR
                                                          APPLICANTS AND
                                                          LICENSEES
6L  86-15  INFORMATION RELATING TO        09/22/86    ALL LICENSEES
            COMPLIANCE WITH 10 CFR 50.49,               AND HOLDERS OF
            "EQ OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT                  AN APPLICATION
            IMPORTANT TO SAFETY"                         FOR AN
                                                          OPERATING
                                                          LICENSE
6L  86-14  OPERATOR LICENSING              08/20/86    ALL POWER
            EXAMINATIONS                                REACTOR
                                                          LICENSEES AND
                                                          APPLICANTS
GL  66-13   POTENTIAL INCONSISTENCY        07/23/86    ALL POWER
            BETWEEN PLANT SAFETY ANALYSES                REACTOR
            AND TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS                LICENSEES WITH
                                                          CE AND B&W
                                                          PRESSURIZED
                                                          WATER REACTORS
OL  86-12   CRITERIA FOR UNIQUE  


==PURPOSE==
==PURPOSE==
EXEMPTION FROM CONVERSION FROMTHE USE OF HEU FUEL07/23/8607/03/66ALL POWERREACTORLICENSEES WITHCE AND B&WPRESSURIZEDWATER REACTORSALL NON-POWERREACTORLICENSEESAUTHORIZED TOUSE HEU FUELGL 66-116L 66-10DISTRIBUTION OF PRODUCTSIRRADIATED IN RESEARCHREACTORSIMPLEMENTATION OF FIREPROTECTION REQUIREMENTS06/25/8604/28/86ALL NON- POWERREACTORLICENSEESALL POWERREACTORLICENSEE ANDAPPLICANTS6L 86-09 TECHNICAL RESOLUTION OFGENERIC ISSUE NO. B-59(N-1) LOOP OPERATION IN BWRSAND PWRSGL 86-08 AVAILABILITY OF SUPPLEMENT 4TO NUREG-0933, "APRIORITIZATION OF GENERICSAFETY ISSUES"GL B6-07 TRANSMITTAL OF NUREG-1190REGARDING THE SAN ONOFRE UNIT1 LOSS OF POWER AND WATERHAMMER EVENT03/31/8603/25/8603/20/86ALL BWR ANDPWR LICENSEESAND APPLICANTSALL LICENSEES,APPLICANTS ANDCONSTRUCTIONPERMIT HOLDERSALL LICENSEESAND APPLICANTS iCT I7 c-3 -This letter is provided for information only. It does not contain any newrequirements or guidance for licensees of boiling water reactors. Actionsbased on the contents provided herein are voluntary and no reply to the NRC isrequired.
07/03/66    ALL NON-POWER
            EXEMPTION FROM CONVERSION FROM                REACTOR
            THE USE OF HEU FUEL                          LICENSEES
                                                        AUTHORIZED TO
                                                          USE HEU FUEL
GL  66-11  DISTRIBUTION OF PRODUCTS        06/25/86    ALL NON- POWER
            IRRADIATED IN RESEARCH                      REACTOR
            REACTORS                                    LICENSEES
6L  66-10  IMPLEMENTATION OF FIRE          04/28/86    ALL POWER
            PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS                      REACTOR
                                                        LICENSEE AND
                                                        APPLICANTS
6L  86-09 TECHNICAL RESOLUTION OF        03/31/86    ALL BWR AND
            GENERIC ISSUE NO. B-59                       PWR LICENSEES
            (N-1) LOOP OPERATION IN BWRS                AND APPLICANTS
            AND PWRS
GL  86-08   AVAILABILITY OF SUPPLEMENT 4    03/25/86    ALL LICENSEES,
            TO NUREG-0933, "A                            APPLICANTS AND
            PRIORITIZATION OF GENERIC                    CONSTRUCTION
            SAFETY ISSUES"                               PERMIT HOLDERS
GL B6-07   TRANSMITTAL OF NUREG-1190      03/20/86    ALL LICENSEES
            REGARDING THE SAN ONOFRE UNIT                AND APPLICANTS
            1 LOSS OF POWER AND WATER
            HAMMER EVENT
 
iCT I7 c
                                                      - 3 -
          This letter is provided for information only. It does not contain any new requirements or guidance for licensees of boiling water reactors. Actions based on the contents provided herein are voluntary and no reply to the NRC is required.


Sincerely,Robert M. Bernero, DirectorDivision of BWR LicensingOffice of Nuclear Reactor RegulationOFC : PSB:DBL PSB:DBL :KA WR D:SRO Ae D:BWR--- --- -- -- --- --X----- :- -- -- -- -: -- ----:NAME :JRidgely:ye : iman :G nas : TSpeis : RBer ero :DATE :01S1t/86 :1IG3 /86 :10/ /86 :10/ /86 :19/rI /86OFFICIAL RECORD COPY}}
Sincerely, Robert M. Bernero, Director Division of BWR Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation OFC  : PSB:DBL       PSB:DBL         Ae WR
                                  :KA               D:SRO             D:BWR
          ---
          -               --   --     X-----     :-  -- --   -- -:   --   ----   : -- - -- - -
NAME :JRidgely:ye :       iman   :G       nas   : TSpeis           : RBer ero     :
DATE :01S1t/86     :1IG3 /86       :10/       /86 :10/       /86     :19/rI /86 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY}}


{{GL-Nav}}
{{GL-Nav}}

Latest revision as of 03:48, 24 November 2019

NRC Generic Letter 1986-017: Availability of NUREG-1169, Technical Findings Related to Generic Issue C-8; Boiling Water Reactor Main Steam Isolation Valve Leakage & Leakage Treatment Methods
ML031150302
Person / Time
Issue date: 10/17/1986
From: Bernero R
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
References
GL-86-017, NUDOCS 8610230062
Download: ML031150302 (5)


UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 OCTi?18 TO ALL LICENSEES OF BOILING WATER REACTORS AND APPLICANTS

Gentlemen:

SUBJECT: AVAILABILITY OF NUREG-1169, "TECHNICAL FINDINGS RELATED TO

GENERIC ISSUE C-8; BOILING WATER REACTOR MAIN STEAM ISOLATION

VALVE LEAKAGE AND LEAKAGE TREATMENT METHODS" (Generic Letter 86-17)

This letter is to inform you that NUREG-1169, "Technical Findings Related to Generic Issue C-8; Boiling Water Reactor Main Steam Isolation Valve Leakage and Leakage Treatment Methods", was published in June, 1986. This NUREG

presents the results of the NRC staff and contractor efforts to assess Generic Issue C-8, "MSIV Leakage and LCS Failures". This issue deals with the difficulty of some main steam isolation valves (MSIVs) in Boiling Water Reactors (BWRs) to meet Technical Specification leakage rate limits (which are typically 11.5 SCFH at a 25 psig test pressure) and with the need for leakage control systems. The leakage rates are based on a large loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA), a specified design basis source term from the core (TID 14844),

the worst single active failure, and no credit for any non-seismic Category I

equipment, components, and structures. To ensure acceptable performance guidelines for engineered safety features, leakage control systems (LCS) have been installed on most BWRs to direct any leakage past MSIVs during the design basis LOCA to an area served by the Standby Gas Treatment System (SGTS). If the leakage rate past an MSIV significantly exceeds the Technical Specification value, the LCS may not be effective because of limitations in its design.

As a result of these concerns, the staff prioritized the MSIV leakage and LCS

failures as a high priority Generic Issue in January 1983. Independently, the BWR Owners Group (BWROG) formed the MSIV Leakage Control Committee to determine the cause of high leakage rates associated with many of the MSIVs, and to develop recommendations for reducing the leakage rates. The BWROG

-: Committee completed its effort and provided recommendations and comments to the staff in February, 1984 and April, 1986.

In evaluating MSIV leakage with respect to offsite'doses following a LOCA, the technical evaluation of this Generic Issue has used realistic assumptions concerning the equipment, facilities and site characteristics available to mitigate the effects of a LOCA. The specific elements of the effort were:

° To evaluate the BWROG recommendations associated with reducing leakage past the MSIVs and assess the effectiveness of the recommendations as implemented by licensees.

o To evaluate the existing safety-related LCS comparing it's effectiveness with that of other methods of handling the leakage likely to be available following a LOCA.

A4,

DOT 1 7 1986 o To perform a probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) to evaluate the reliability and relative risks associated with the different methods of mitigating the effects of a LOCA.

° To evaluate the use of alternate equipment to mitigate the effects of a LOCA, and potential changes in allowable MSIV leakage rates.

o To identify areas in current licensing guidance (the Regulations, the

  • Standard Review Plan, the Regulatory Guides, and the Technical Specifications) that are related to MSIVs and LCSs that will be considered inthe second, or regulatory assessment, phase of resolution.

of the generic issue.

A safety-related LCS was evaluated by comparing it's effectiveness with other methods of handling leakage that could be available following a LOCA. Several ways to treat leakage which make.-use of the holdup volume and surfaces of the main steam lines (MSL) and condenser and fission product attenuation elsewhere, were considered. A PRA considering the reliability and relative risks associated with the different-methods of mitigating the effects of a LOCA was performed.

The overall risks from the accident sequences inwhich MSYV leakage could be a significant factor were found to be low without an LCS, and alternate fission product handling techniques were shown to produce significant potential dose reductions.

NUREG-1169 represents technical findings associated with Generic Issue C-8 and the staff expects it tlobe used in the regulatory resolution of the issue. The latter is anticipated to be complete inanother year incoordination with ongoing generic activities relating to accident source terms, to overall containment leak rate and leak rate testing considerations.

Neither this letter nor NUREG-1169 constitute a change inthe existing generic staff positions or allowable MSIV leakage rates, nor the specifications for MSIV leakage control systems. Therefore, no action is being requested of applicants or licensees. The information contained in NUREG-1169, however, including the recommendations of the BWROG, may be useful guidance for some licensees contemplating plant specific change requests related to this issue pending final generic resolution.

NUREG-1169 may be purchased by calling (202) 275-2060 or (202) 275-2171 or by writing to the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Post Office Box Number 37082, Washington, D. C. 20013, or the National Technical Information Service, Department of Commerce, 5258 Port Royal Road, Springfield, Virginia 22161. I

GOT 17a

-3- This letter is provided for information only. It does not contain any new requirements or guidance for licensees of boiling water reactors. Actions based on the contents provided herein are voluntary and no reply to the NRC is required.

Sincerely, Acb~ertXb r Robert M. Bernero, Director Division of BWR Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation OFC  : PSB:DBL PSB:DBL A:R

AW .BWR

ye . b--------:------------ --- N f --:- ----- -----

NAME :JRidgely:ye : iman :G nas  : TSpeis  : RBerero  ::

E ------------

DATE :IV/lv/86 :10 3 /86


/

{V/ L/6 8------------ ------------
f//6 :fr 8

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

LIST L. RECENTLY ISSUED GENERIC L TERS

Generic Date of Letter No. Subject Issuance Issued To GL 86-16 WESTINGHOUSE ECCS EVALUATION 10/22/86 ALL

MODELS PRESSURIZED

WATER REACTOR

APPLICANTS AND

LICENSEES

6L 86-15 INFORMATION RELATING TO 09/22/86 ALL LICENSEES

COMPLIANCE WITH 10 CFR 50.49, AND HOLDERS OF

"EQ OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT AN APPLICATION

IMPORTANT TO SAFETY" FOR AN

OPERATING

LICENSE

6L 86-14 OPERATOR LICENSING 08/20/86 ALL POWER

EXAMINATIONS REACTOR

LICENSEES AND

APPLICANTS

GL 66-13 POTENTIAL INCONSISTENCY 07/23/86 ALL POWER

BETWEEN PLANT SAFETY ANALYSES REACTOR

AND TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS LICENSEES WITH

CE AND B&W

PRESSURIZED

WATER REACTORS

OL 86-12 CRITERIA FOR UNIQUE

PURPOSE

07/03/66 ALL NON-POWER

EXEMPTION FROM CONVERSION FROM REACTOR

THE USE OF HEU FUEL LICENSEES

AUTHORIZED TO

USE HEU FUEL

GL 66-11 DISTRIBUTION OF PRODUCTS 06/25/86 ALL NON- POWER

IRRADIATED IN RESEARCH REACTOR

REACTORS LICENSEES

6L 66-10 IMPLEMENTATION OF FIRE 04/28/86 ALL POWER

PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS REACTOR

LICENSEE AND

APPLICANTS

6L 86-09 TECHNICAL RESOLUTION OF 03/31/86 ALL BWR AND

GENERIC ISSUE NO. B-59 PWR LICENSEES

(N-1) LOOP OPERATION IN BWRS AND APPLICANTS

AND PWRS

GL 86-08 AVAILABILITY OF SUPPLEMENT 4 03/25/86 ALL LICENSEES,

TO NUREG-0933, "A APPLICANTS AND

PRIORITIZATION OF GENERIC CONSTRUCTION

SAFETY ISSUES" PERMIT HOLDERS

GL B6-07 TRANSMITTAL OF NUREG-1190 03/20/86 ALL LICENSEES

REGARDING THE SAN ONOFRE UNIT AND APPLICANTS

1 LOSS OF POWER AND WATER

HAMMER EVENT

iCT I7 c

- 3 -

This letter is provided for information only. It does not contain any new requirements or guidance for licensees of boiling water reactors. Actions based on the contents provided herein are voluntary and no reply to the NRC is required.

Sincerely, Robert M. Bernero, Director Division of BWR Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation OFC  : PSB:DBL PSB:DBL Ae WR

KA D:SRO D:BWR

---

- -- -- X-----  :- -- -- -- -: -- ----  : -- - -- - -

NAME :JRidgely:ye : iman :G nas  : TSpeis  : RBer ero  :

DATE :01S1t/86 :1IG3 /86 :10/ /86 :10/ /86 :19/rI /86 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

Template:GL-Nav