ML20237D766: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot insert |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot change |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML20237D766 | | number = ML20237D766 | ||
| issue date = 12/22/1987 | | issue date = 12/22/1987 | ||
| title = Responds to | | title = Responds to to TE Murley Re Effects of Postulated Dc Power Failure on ECCS Performance for Plants.Compliance W/Requirements of 10CFR50.46 & App K Cannot Be Concluded. Operation of Units During 60-day Period Acceptable | ||
| author name = Holahan G | | author name = Holahan G | ||
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION (NRR) | | author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION (NRR) | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| contact person = | | contact person = | ||
| document report number = NUDOCS 8712240172 | | document report number = NUDOCS 8712240172 | ||
| title reference date = 12-22-1987 | |||
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, NRC TO UTILITY, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE | | document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, NRC TO UTILITY, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE | ||
| page count = 12 | | page count = 12 | ||
| Line 16: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:_. | {{#Wiki_filter:_. | ||
o December 22, 1987 | o December 22, 1987 | ||
Docket Nos. 50-254, 265, | ) | ||
Docket Nos. 50-254, 265, Distribution: | |||
j 237, 249 | |||
~ Docket. H le ACRS(10) | |||
NRC & Local PDRs Plant File PDIII-2 r/f JPartlow GHolahan EJordan LLuther OGC-Beth. | |||
TRoss Mr. L. D. Butterfield, Jr. | TRoss Mr. L. D. Butterfield, Jr. | ||
Nuclear Licensing Manager | Nuclear Licensing Manager Commonwealth Edison Company P.O. Box 767 Chicago, Illinois 60690 | ||
==Dear Mr. Butterfield:== | ==Dear Mr. Butterfield:== | ||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
QUAD CITIES STATION UNITS 1 AND 2, DRESDEN STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 EFFECT OF POSTULATED DC POWER FAILURE | QUAD CITIES STATION UNITS 1 AND 2, DRESDEN STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 EFFECT OF POSTULATED DC POWER FAILURE | ||
==References:== | ==References:== | ||
1. | |||
R. F. Janecek letter to T. A. Ippolito dated June 12, 1980 2. | |||
T. A. Ippolito letter to D. L. Peoples dated April 25, 1980 This letter is in response to your {{letter dated|date=December 22, 1987|text=December 22, 1987 letter}} to T. E. Murley on the subject of the effects of a postulated DC power failure on ECCS performance for Quad Cities Stations Units 1 and 2 and Dresden Station Units 2 and 3. | |||
The staff has reviewed your description of the issue; your understanding of the licensing assumptions involved in demonstrating compliance with 10 CFR 50.46 and 10 CFR 50 Appendix K; your safety analysis addressing Quad Cities Unit I startup and continued safe operation of Quad Cities Unit 2 and Dresden Units 2 and 3; and your commitment to resolve this issue within 60 days either by justification for not considering failures of the DC power supply or by proposing plant modifications and an implementation schedule which would assure accepteble ECCS performance following a LOCA plus loss of offsite power and a DC power supply failure. | The staff has reviewed your description of the issue; your understanding of the licensing assumptions involved in demonstrating compliance with 10 CFR 50.46 and 10 CFR 50 Appendix K; your safety analysis addressing Quad Cities Unit I startup and continued safe operation of Quad Cities Unit 2 and Dresden Units 2 and 3; and your commitment to resolve this issue within 60 days either by justification for not considering failures of the DC power supply or by proposing plant modifications and an implementation schedule which would assure accepteble ECCS performance following a LOCA plus loss of offsite power and a DC power supply failure. | ||
On the basis of information currently available including information in references 1 and 2, we cannot conclude at this time that the Quad Cities Units 1 and 2 and Dresden Units 2 and 3 are in compliance with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.46 and 10 CFR 50 Appendix K. In addition, we have reviewed your safety analysis for continued operation for 60 days and agree that the low probability of the accident in question and the compensatory measures taken provide adequate B71224017207122Q DR ADOCK 0500 | On the basis of information currently available including information in references 1 and 2, we cannot conclude at this time that the Quad Cities Units 1 and 2 and Dresden Units 2 and 3 are in compliance with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.46 and 10 CFR 50 Appendix K. | ||
In addition, we have reviewed your safety analysis for continued operation for 60 days and agree that the low probability of the accident in question and the compensatory measures taken provide adequate B71224017207122Q DR ADOCK 0500 | |||
e | e L. D. Butterfield, Jr.. projections to assure that tnere is no undue risk to the public health and safety during this period. | ||
L. D. Butterfield, Jr.. | In light of these findings, we conclude that | ||
? operation of the units in question is acceptable and that any consideration of enforcement action (should a condition of non-compliance be concluded) will be waived by the NRC during this 60 day period. | |||
l | Upon review of the additional l | ||
l information or plans you provide during these 60 days, we will take the appropriate measures (e.g., temporary exemption if needed) to assure the long term resolution i | |||
of this issue, Gary M. Holahan, Assistant Director for Regions III and V Division of Reactor Projects l | |||
Office of 94 clear Reactor Regulation l | |||
l. | |||
CENTRAL FILE DISTRIBUTION PD3/2 FILE I | |||
'1 | |||
-TROSS L1 h | |||
DMULLER | |||
' ~ | ' ~ | ||
DCRUTCHFIELD- | \\ | ||
DCRUTCHFIELD-GHOLAHAN m | |||
GHOLAHAN | D3/ | ||
D3/ | D I P | ||
I> | II D TROSS:mk DM ER GHOLAHAN CNORELIUS 12/2%/87 12/9 M87 12/2t/87-12/zt/87 M $ SB I> | ||
7 ,. | FROSA WQDGES 9 | ||
a | F1.M L/87 12/~ /87 is, ii | ||
.g ;. | |||
i | s 7,. | ||
a a | |||
lt L | |||
i g' | |||
b.i. | |||
3 l | 3 l | ||
vi | vi | ||
11r. L. D. Butterfield, Jr. | 11r. L. D. Butterfield, Jr. | ||
Mr. Stephen E. Shelton Vice President Iowa-Illinois Gas and Electric Company P.O. Box 4350 Davenport, Iowa 52808 Mr. Michael Miller Isham, Lincoln & Beale Three First National Plaza | Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station Commonwealth Edison Company Units 1 and 2 cc: | ||
Suite 5200 | Mr. Stephen E. Shelton Vice President Iowa-Illinois Gas and Electric Company P.O. Box 4350 Davenport, Iowa 52808 Mr. Michael Miller Isham, Lincoln & Beale Three First National Plaza Suite 5200 Chicago, Illinois 60602 Mr. Richard Bax Station Manager i | ||
Chicago, Illinois 60602 Mr. Richard Bax Station Manager i | Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station. | ||
Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station . | l 22710 206th Avenue North l' | ||
l | Cordova Illinois 61242 Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 22712 206th Avenue North Cordova, Illinois 61242 Chairman Rock Island County Board of Supervisors 1504 3rd Avenue Rock. Island County Office B1dg. | ||
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 22712 206th Avenue North Cordova, Illinois 61242 Chairman Rock Island County Board of Supervisors 1504 3rd Avenue Rock. Island County Office B1dg. | Rock Island, Illinois 61201 Mr. Michael C. Parker, Chief Division of Engineering Illinois Department of Nuclear Safety 1035 Outer Park Drive Springfield, Illinois 62704 I | ||
Rock Island, Illinois 61201 Mr. Michael C. Parker, Chief Division of Engineering Illinois Department of Nuclear Safety 1035 Outer Park Drive Springfield, Illinois 62704 | Regional Administrator, Region III U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 l | ||
l | |||
,. f a December 22, 1987 Docket Nos. 50-254, 265, Distribution: | |||
237, 249 | 237, 249 Docket File ACRS(10) i NRC & Local PDRs Plant File PDIII-2 r/f JPartlow GHolahan EJordan LLuther OGC-Beth. | ||
TRoss Mr. L. D. Butterfield,-Jr. | TRoss Mr. L. D. Butterfield,-Jr. | ||
Nuclear Licensing Manager | Nuclear Licensing Manager Commonwealth Edison Company P.O. Box 767 Chicago, Illinois 60690 | ||
Commonwealth Edison Company P.O. Box 767 Chicago, Illinois 60690 | |||
==Dear Mr. Butterfield:== | ==Dear Mr. Butterfield:== | ||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
QUAD CITIES STATION UNITS 1 AND 2, DRESDEN STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 EFFECT OF POSTULATED DC POWER FAILURE | QUAD CITIES STATION UNITS 1 AND 2, DRESDEN STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 EFFECT OF POSTULATED DC POWER FAILURE | ||
==References:== | ==References:== | ||
1. | |||
R. F. Janecek letter to T. A. Ippolito dated June 12, 1980 2. | |||
The staff has reviewed your description of the issue; your understanding of the licensing assumptions involved in demonstrating compliance with 10 CFR 50.46 and 10 CFR 50 Appendix K; your safety analysis addressing Quad Cities Unit I startup and continued safe operation of Quad Cities Unit 2 and Dresden Units 2 and 3; and your commitment to resolve this issue within 60 days either by | T. A. Ippolito letter to D. L. Peoples dated April 25, 1980 This letter is in response to your {{letter dated|date=December 22, 1987|text=December 22, 1987 letter}} to T. E. Murley on l | ||
plant modifications and an implementation schedule which would assure acceptable ECCS performance following a LOCA plus loss of offsite power and a DC power supply failure. | the subject of the effects of a postulated DC power failure on ECCS performance for Quad Cities Stations Units 1 and 2 and Dresden Station Units 2 and 3. | ||
On the basis of information currently available including information in references 1 and 2, we cannot conclude at this time that the Quad Cities Units 1 and 2 and Dresden Units 2 and 3 are in compliance with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.46 and 10 CFR 50 Appendix K. In addition, we have reviewed your safety analysis for continued operation for 60 days and agree that the low probability of the accident in question and the compensatory measures taken provide adequate | The staff has reviewed your description of the issue; your understanding of the licensing assumptions involved in demonstrating compliance with 10 CFR 50.46 and 10 CFR 50 Appendix K; your safety analysis addressing Quad Cities Unit I startup and continued safe operation of Quad Cities Unit 2 and Dresden Units 2 and 3; and your commitment to resolve this issue within 60 days either by l | ||
justification for not considering failures of the DC power supply or by proposing plant modifications and an implementation schedule which would assure acceptable ECCS performance following a LOCA plus loss of offsite power and a DC power supply failure. | |||
On the basis of information currently available including information in references 1 and 2, we cannot conclude at this time that the Quad Cities Units 1 and 2 and Dresden Units 2 and 3 are in compliance with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.46 and 10 CFR 50 Appendix K. | |||
In addition, we have reviewed your safety analysis for continued operation for 60 days and agree that the low probability of the accident in question and the compensatory measures taken provide adequate | |||
a r | l a | ||
r | |||
L. D. 8utterfield, Jr. | -4 j | ||
Gary M. Holahan, Assistant Director for Regions III and V Division of Reactor Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation DISTRIBUTION CENTRAL FILE PD3/2 FILE TROSS DMULLER DCRUTCHFIELD GHOLAHAN D/ | L. D. 8utterfield, Jr. projections to assure that there is no undue risk to the public health and safety during this period. | ||
In light of these findings, we conclude that operation of the units in question is acceptable and that any consideration of enforcement action (should a condition of non-compliance be concluded) will be waived by the NRC during this 60 day period. | |||
Upon review of the additional information or plans you provide during these 60 days, we will take the appropriate measures (e.g., temporary exemption if needed) to assure the long term resolution of this issue. | |||
Gary M. Holahan, Assistant Director for Regions III and V Division of Reactor Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation DISTRIBUTION CENTRAL FILE PD3/2 FILE TROSS DMULLER DCRUTCHFIELD GHOLAHAN D/ | |||
D: | |||
M I D TROSS:mk DML) | |||
GHOLAHAN CNORELIUS 12/22/87 12/#/87 12/21187 12/2t/87 M | |||
B FROSA WHODGES 12hu/87 12 A /87 I | |||
l I | l I | ||
( | ( | ||
i i | i i | ||
] | |||
g | g | ||
. Hr. (.. D. Butterfield, Jr. - | |||
L | Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station Connonwealth Edison Company Units 1 and 2 l | ||
Iowa-Illinois Gas'and Electric Company | cc: | ||
L | |||
'Mr. Stephen E. Shelton l-Vice President. | |||
Iowa-Illinois Gas'and Electric Company P.O. Box 4350-Davenport, Iowa. 52808 Mr. Michael Miller Isham, Lincoln & Beale Three First National Plaza Suite 5200 Chicago, Illinois. 60602 Mr. Richard Bax Station Manager Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station 22710 206th Avenue North Cordova, Illinois 61242 Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 22712 206th Avenue North Cordova, Illinois -61242 Chairman Rock Island County Board of Supervisors 1504 3rd Avenue Rock Island County Office Bldg. | |||
Rock Island, Illinois 61201 Mr. Michael C. Parker, Chief Division of Engineering Illinois Department of Nuclear Safety 1035 Outer Park Drive Springfield, Illinois 62704 Regional Administrator, Region III U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Connission 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 l | Rock Island, Illinois 61201 Mr. Michael C. Parker, Chief Division of Engineering Illinois Department of Nuclear Safety 1035 Outer Park Drive Springfield, Illinois 62704 Regional Administrator, Region III U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Connission 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 l | ||
i i | i i | ||
._--____A | |||
{ | { | ||
Docket Nos. 50-254, 265, | December 22, 1987 i | ||
237, 249 | Docket Nos. 50-254, 265, Distribution: | ||
NRC & Local PDRs | 237, 249 Docket File ACRS(10) | ||
TRoss Mr. L. D. Butterfield, Jr. | NRC & Local PDRs Plant File PDIII-2 r/f JPartlow GHolahan EJordsn LLuther 0GC-Beth. | ||
Nuclear Licensing Manager Commonwealth Edison Company P.O. Box 767 Chicago, Illinois 60690 | TRoss i | ||
Mr. L. D. Butterfield, Jr. | |||
i Nuclear Licensing Manager Commonwealth Edison Company P.O. Box 767 Chicago, Illinois 60690 | |||
==Dear Mr. Butterfield:== | ==Dear Mr. Butterfield:== | ||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
QUAD CITIES STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 DRESDEN STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 EFFECT OF POSTULATED DC POWER FAILURE | QUAD CITIES STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 DRESDEN STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 EFFECT OF POSTULATED DC POWER FAILURE | ||
==References:== | ==References:== | ||
1. | |||
R. F. Janecek letter to T. A. Ippolito dated June 12, 1980 2. | |||
The staff has reviewed your description of the issue; your understanding of the licensing assumptions involved in demonstrating compliance with 10 CFR 50.46 and 10 CFR 50 Appendix K; your safety analysis addressing Quad Cities Unit I startup and continued safe operation of Quad Cities Unit 2 and Dresden Units 2 and 3; and your commitment to resolve this issue within 60 days either by justification for not considering failures of the DC power supply or by proposing plant modifications and an implementation schedule which would assure acceptable | T. A. Ippolito letter to D. L. Peoples dated April 25, 1980 This letter is in response to your December. 22, 1987 letter to T. E. Murley on the subject of the effects of a postulated DC power failure on ECCS performance for Quad Cities Stations Units 1 and 2 and Dresden Station Units 2 and 3. | ||
ECCS performance following a LOCA plus loss of offsite power and a DC power supply failure. | The staff has reviewed your description of the issue; your understanding of the licensing assumptions involved in demonstrating compliance with 10 CFR 50.46 and 10 CFR 50 Appendix K; your safety analysis addressing Quad Cities Unit I startup and continued safe operation of Quad Cities Unit 2 and Dresden Units 2 and 3; and your commitment to resolve this issue within 60 days either by justification for not considering failures of the DC power supply or by proposing plant modifications and an implementation schedule which would assure acceptable ECCS performance following a LOCA plus loss of offsite power and a DC power supply failure. | ||
On the basis of information currently available including information in references 1 and 2, we cannot conclude at this time that the Quad Cities Units 1 and 2 and Dresden Units 2 and 3 are in compliance with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.46 and 10 CFR 50 Appendix K. In addition, we have reviewed your safety analysis | On the basis of information currently available including information in references 1 and 2, we cannot conclude at this time that the Quad Cities Units 1 and 2 and Dresden Units 2 and 3 are in compliance with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.46 f | ||
m . | and 10 CFR 50 Appendix K. | ||
In addition, we have reviewed your safety analysis a | |||
for continued operation for 60 days and agree that the low probability of the accident in question and the compensatory measures taken provide adequate i | |||
i m. | |||
. . . . , s. | ...., s. | ||
safety during this period. In light of these findings, we conclude that operation of the units in question is acceptable and that any consideration of enforcement action (should a condition of non-compliance be concluded) will be waived by the NRC during this 60 day period. Upon review of the additional information or plans you provide during these 60 days, we will take the appropriate measures (e.g., temporary exemption if needed) to assure the long term resolution of this issue. | 4 L. D. Butterfield, Jr. projections to assure that there is no undue risk to the public health and safety during this period. | ||
In light of these findings, we conclude that operation of the units in question is acceptable and that any consideration of enforcement action (should a condition of non-compliance be concluded) will be waived by the NRC during this 60 day period. | |||
Upon review of the additional information or plans you provide during these 60 days, we will take the appropriate measures (e.g., temporary exemption if needed) to assure the long term resolution of this issue. | |||
/3 Gary M. Holahan, Assistant Director for Regions III and V Division of Reactor Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation DISTRIBUTION CENTRAL FILE PD3/2 FILE TROSS DMULLER DCRUTCHFIELD GHOLAHAN D3/ | |||
PD: | |||
II D TROSS:mk | |||
-DM GHOLAHAN CNORELIUS 12/).2/87 12/*J/87. | |||
12/21/87 12/zt/87 AB B | |||
e FROSA WH0DGES 12ht /87 12 % /87 l | |||
ll.-_--.- | |||
14A 'i | 14A 'i | ||
-] | |||
l 14r. L. D. Butterfield, Jr. | l 14r. L. D. Butterfield, Jr. | ||
l | |||
-Commonwealth Edison Company Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station - | |||
Units 1 and 2 cc:- | Units 1 and 2 cc:- | ||
Mr. Stephen E. Shelton Vice President . | Mr. Stephen E. Shelton Vice President. | ||
-Iowa-Illinois Gas and Electric Company P.O. Box 4350 Davenport, Iowa 52808 Mr. Michael Miller Isham,. Lincoln & Beale Three First National Plaza Suite 5200-Chicago, Illinois 60602 Mr. Richard Bax Station Manager Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station 22710 206th Avenue North Cordova, Illinois 61242 Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 22712 206th Avenue North | |||
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 22712 206th Avenue North | -Cordova, Illinois :61242 Chairman-Rock Island County Board | ||
. of Supervisors 1504 3rd Avenue Rock Island County Office Bldg. | |||
Rock Island, Illinois 61201 Mr. Michael C. Parker, Chief Division'of Engineering Illinois Department of Nuclear Safety 1035 Outer Park Drive Springfield, Illinois 62704 Regional Administrator, Region III U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 | Rock Island, Illinois 61201 Mr. Michael C. Parker, Chief Division'of Engineering Illinois Department of Nuclear Safety 1035 Outer Park Drive Springfield, Illinois 62704 Regional Administrator, Region III U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 | ||
,. m | |||
~ | |||
*,.s December 22, 1987 Docket Nos. 50-254, 265, Distribution: | |||
237, 249 | 237, 249 Docket Fiie ACRS (10) | ||
NRC & Local PDRs | NRC & Local PDRs Plant File PDIII-2 r/f JPartlow GHolahan EJordan LLuther 0GC-Beth. | ||
TRoss Mr. L. D. Butterfield, Jr. | TRoss Mr. L. D. Butterfield, Jr. | ||
Nuclear Licensing Manager Commonwealth Edison Company P.O. Box 767 Chicago, Illinois 60690 | Nuclear Licensing Manager Commonwealth Edison Company P.O. Box 767 Chicago, Illinois 60690 | ||
==Dear Mr. Butterfield:== | ==Dear Mr. Butterfield:== | ||
b | b | ||
| Line 154: | Line 187: | ||
==References:== | ==References:== | ||
1. | |||
R. F. Janecek letter to T. A. Ippolito dated June 12, 1980 2. | |||
T. A. Ippolito letter to D. L. Peoples dated April 25, 1980 This letter is in response to your {{letter dated|date=December 22, 1987|text=December 22, 1987 letter}} to T. E. Murley on the subject of the effects of a postulated DC power failure on ECCS performance for Quad Cities Stations Units 1 and 2 and Dresden Station Units 2 and 3. | |||
The staff has reviewed your description of the issue; your understanding of the licensing assumptions involved in demonstrating compliance with 10 CFR 50.46 and 10 CFR 50 Appendix K; your safety analysis addressing Quad Cities Unit 1 startup and continued safe operation of Quad Cities Unit 2 and Dresden Units 2 and 3; and your commitment to resolve this issue within 60 days either by justification for not considering failures of the DC power supply or by proposing plant modifications and an implementation schedule which would assure acceptable ECCS performance following a LOCA plus loss of offsite power and a DC power supply failure. | The staff has reviewed your description of the issue; your understanding of the licensing assumptions involved in demonstrating compliance with 10 CFR 50.46 and 10 CFR 50 Appendix K; your safety analysis addressing Quad Cities Unit 1 startup and continued safe operation of Quad Cities Unit 2 and Dresden Units 2 and 3; and your commitment to resolve this issue within 60 days either by justification for not considering failures of the DC power supply or by proposing plant modifications and an implementation schedule which would assure acceptable ECCS performance following a LOCA plus loss of offsite power and a DC power supply failure. | ||
On the basis of information currently available including information in references 1 and 2, we cannot conclude at this time that the Quad Cities Units 1 and 2 and Dresden Units 2 and 3 are in compliance with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.46 and 10 CFR 50 Appendix K. In addition, we have reviewed your safety analysis for continued operation for 60 days and agree that the low probability of the accident in question and the compensatory measures taken provide adequate | On the basis of information currently available including information in references 1 and 2, we cannot conclude at this time that the Quad Cities Units 1 and 2 and Dresden Units 2 and 3 are in compliance with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.46 and 10 CFR 50 Appendix K. | ||
In addition, we have reviewed your safety analysis for continued operation for 60 days and agree that the low probability of the accident in question and the compensatory measures taken provide adequate | |||
L. D. Butterfield, Jr. | L. D. Butterfield, Jr. l l | ||
projections to assure that there is no undue risk to the public health and safety during this period. In light of these findings, we conclude that operation of the units in question is acceptable and.that any consideration of enforcement action (should a condition of non-compliance be concluded) will be waived by the NRC during this 60 day period. Upon review of the. additional information or plans you provide during these 60 days, we will take the appropriate measures (e.g., temporary exemption if needed) to assure the long term resolution of this issue. | projections to assure that there is no undue risk to the public health and safety during this period. | ||
In light of these findings, we conclude that operation of the units in question is acceptable and.that any consideration of enforcement action (should a condition of non-compliance be concluded) will be waived by the NRC during this 60 day period. | |||
Upon review of the. additional information or plans you provide during these 60 days, we will take the appropriate measures (e.g., temporary exemption if needed) to assure the long term resolution of this issue. | |||
Gary M. Holahan, Assistant Director for Regions III and V Division of Reactor Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation | Gary M. Holahan, Assistant Director for Regions III and V Division of Reactor Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation | ||
-DISTRIBUTION CENTRAL FILE PD3/2 FILE TROSS DMULLER DCRUTCHFIELD D | |||
TROSS DMULLER DCRUTCHFIELD D | D: | ||
{ | |||
I D TROSS:mk | |||
.DM GHOLAHAN CNORELIUS 12/).3/87 12/+3/87 12/2t/87 12/2t/87 M | |||
B FR05A WH0DGES 12ht./87 12/~/87 1 | |||
Nr. L. D. Butterfield, Jr. | Nr. L. D. Butterfield, Jr. | ||
Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station Commonwealth Edison Company Units 1 and 2 cc: | |||
Mr. Stephen E. Shelton Vice President Iowa-Illinois Gas and Electric Company P.O. Box 4350 Davenport, Iowa 52808 Mr. Michael Miller Isham, Lincoln & Beale Three First National Plaza Suite 5200 Chicago, Illinois 60602 Mr. Richard Bax Station Manager Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station 22710 206th Avenue North Cordova, Illinois 61242 Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 22712 206th Avenue North Cordova,' Illinois 61242 Chairman Rock Island County Board of Supervisors 1504 3rd Avenue Rock Island County Office Bldg. | Mr. Stephen E. Shelton Vice President Iowa-Illinois Gas and Electric Company P.O. Box 4350 Davenport, Iowa 52808 Mr. Michael Miller Isham, Lincoln & Beale Three First National Plaza Suite 5200 Chicago, Illinois 60602 Mr. Richard Bax Station Manager Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station 22710 206th Avenue North Cordova, Illinois 61242 Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 22712 206th Avenue North Cordova,' Illinois 61242 Chairman Rock Island County Board of Supervisors 1504 3rd Avenue Rock Island County Office Bldg. | ||
Rock Island, Illinois 61201 Mr. Michael C. Parker, Chief Division of Engineering Illinois Department of Nuclear Safety 1035 Outer Park Drive Springfield, Illinois 62704 Regional Administrator, Region III U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 | Rock Island, Illinois 61201 Mr. Michael C. Parker, Chief Division of Engineering Illinois Department of Nuclear Safety 1035 Outer Park Drive Springfield, Illinois 62704 Regional Administrator, Region III U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 | ||
._e}} | |||
Latest revision as of 07:55, 2 December 2024
| ML20237D766 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Dresden, Quad Cities, 05000000 |
| Issue date: | 12/22/1987 |
| From: | Holahan G Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Butterfield L COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8712240172 | |
| Download: ML20237D766 (12) | |
Text
_.
o December 22, 1987
)
Docket Nos. 50-254, 265, Distribution:
j 237, 249
~ Docket. H le ACRS(10)
NRC & Local PDRs Plant File PDIII-2 r/f JPartlow GHolahan EJordan LLuther OGC-Beth.
TRoss Mr. L. D. Butterfield, Jr.
Nuclear Licensing Manager Commonwealth Edison Company P.O. Box 767 Chicago, Illinois 60690
Dear Mr. Butterfield:
SUBJECT:
QUAD CITIES STATION UNITS 1 AND 2, DRESDEN STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 EFFECT OF POSTULATED DC POWER FAILURE
References:
1.
R. F. Janecek letter to T. A. Ippolito dated June 12, 1980 2.
T. A. Ippolito letter to D. L. Peoples dated April 25, 1980 This letter is in response to your December 22, 1987 letter to T. E. Murley on the subject of the effects of a postulated DC power failure on ECCS performance for Quad Cities Stations Units 1 and 2 and Dresden Station Units 2 and 3.
The staff has reviewed your description of the issue; your understanding of the licensing assumptions involved in demonstrating compliance with 10 CFR 50.46 and 10 CFR 50 Appendix K; your safety analysis addressing Quad Cities Unit I startup and continued safe operation of Quad Cities Unit 2 and Dresden Units 2 and 3; and your commitment to resolve this issue within 60 days either by justification for not considering failures of the DC power supply or by proposing plant modifications and an implementation schedule which would assure accepteble ECCS performance following a LOCA plus loss of offsite power and a DC power supply failure.
On the basis of information currently available including information in references 1 and 2, we cannot conclude at this time that the Quad Cities Units 1 and 2 and Dresden Units 2 and 3 are in compliance with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.46 and 10 CFR 50 Appendix K.
In addition, we have reviewed your safety analysis for continued operation for 60 days and agree that the low probability of the accident in question and the compensatory measures taken provide adequate B71224017207122Q DR ADOCK 0500
e L. D. Butterfield, Jr.. projections to assure that tnere is no undue risk to the public health and safety during this period.
In light of these findings, we conclude that
? operation of the units in question is acceptable and that any consideration of enforcement action (should a condition of non-compliance be concluded) will be waived by the NRC during this 60 day period.
Upon review of the additional l
l information or plans you provide during these 60 days, we will take the appropriate measures (e.g., temporary exemption if needed) to assure the long term resolution i
of this issue, Gary M. Holahan, Assistant Director for Regions III and V Division of Reactor Projects l
Office of 94 clear Reactor Regulation l
l.
CENTRAL FILE DISTRIBUTION PD3/2 FILE I
'1
-TROSS L1 h
DMULLER
' ~
\\
DCRUTCHFIELD-GHOLAHAN m
D3/
D I P
II D TROSS:mk DM ER GHOLAHAN CNORELIUS 12/2%/87 12/9 M87 12/2t/87-12/zt/87 M $ SB I>
FROSA WQDGES 9
F1.M L/87 12/~ /87 is, ii
.g ;.
s 7,.
a a
lt L
i g'
b.i.
3 l
vi
11r. L. D. Butterfield, Jr.
Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station Commonwealth Edison Company Units 1 and 2 cc:
Mr. Stephen E. Shelton Vice President Iowa-Illinois Gas and Electric Company P.O. Box 4350 Davenport, Iowa 52808 Mr. Michael Miller Isham, Lincoln & Beale Three First National Plaza Suite 5200 Chicago, Illinois 60602 Mr. Richard Bax Station Manager i
Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station.
l 22710 206th Avenue North l'
Cordova Illinois 61242 Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 22712 206th Avenue North Cordova, Illinois 61242 Chairman Rock Island County Board of Supervisors 1504 3rd Avenue Rock. Island County Office B1dg.
Rock Island, Illinois 61201 Mr. Michael C. Parker, Chief Division of Engineering Illinois Department of Nuclear Safety 1035 Outer Park Drive Springfield, Illinois 62704 I
Regional Administrator, Region III U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 l
l
,. f a December 22, 1987 Docket Nos. 50-254, 265, Distribution:
237, 249 Docket File ACRS(10) i NRC & Local PDRs Plant File PDIII-2 r/f JPartlow GHolahan EJordan LLuther OGC-Beth.
TRoss Mr. L. D. Butterfield,-Jr.
Nuclear Licensing Manager Commonwealth Edison Company P.O. Box 767 Chicago, Illinois 60690
Dear Mr. Butterfield:
SUBJECT:
QUAD CITIES STATION UNITS 1 AND 2, DRESDEN STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 EFFECT OF POSTULATED DC POWER FAILURE
References:
1.
R. F. Janecek letter to T. A. Ippolito dated June 12, 1980 2.
T. A. Ippolito letter to D. L. Peoples dated April 25, 1980 This letter is in response to your December 22, 1987 letter to T. E. Murley on l
the subject of the effects of a postulated DC power failure on ECCS performance for Quad Cities Stations Units 1 and 2 and Dresden Station Units 2 and 3.
The staff has reviewed your description of the issue; your understanding of the licensing assumptions involved in demonstrating compliance with 10 CFR 50.46 and 10 CFR 50 Appendix K; your safety analysis addressing Quad Cities Unit I startup and continued safe operation of Quad Cities Unit 2 and Dresden Units 2 and 3; and your commitment to resolve this issue within 60 days either by l
justification for not considering failures of the DC power supply or by proposing plant modifications and an implementation schedule which would assure acceptable ECCS performance following a LOCA plus loss of offsite power and a DC power supply failure.
On the basis of information currently available including information in references 1 and 2, we cannot conclude at this time that the Quad Cities Units 1 and 2 and Dresden Units 2 and 3 are in compliance with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.46 and 10 CFR 50 Appendix K.
In addition, we have reviewed your safety analysis for continued operation for 60 days and agree that the low probability of the accident in question and the compensatory measures taken provide adequate
l a
r
-4 j
L. D. 8utterfield, Jr. projections to assure that there is no undue risk to the public health and safety during this period.
In light of these findings, we conclude that operation of the units in question is acceptable and that any consideration of enforcement action (should a condition of non-compliance be concluded) will be waived by the NRC during this 60 day period.
Upon review of the additional information or plans you provide during these 60 days, we will take the appropriate measures (e.g., temporary exemption if needed) to assure the long term resolution of this issue.
Gary M. Holahan, Assistant Director for Regions III and V Division of Reactor Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation DISTRIBUTION CENTRAL FILE PD3/2 FILE TROSS DMULLER DCRUTCHFIELD GHOLAHAN D/
D:
M I D TROSS:mk DML)
GHOLAHAN CNORELIUS 12/22/87 12/#/87 12/21187 12/2t/87 M
B FROSA WHODGES 12hu/87 12 A /87 I
l I
(
i i
]
g
. Hr. (.. D. Butterfield, Jr. -
Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station Connonwealth Edison Company Units 1 and 2 l
cc:
L
'Mr. Stephen E. Shelton l-Vice President.
Iowa-Illinois Gas'and Electric Company P.O. Box 4350-Davenport, Iowa. 52808 Mr. Michael Miller Isham, Lincoln & Beale Three First National Plaza Suite 5200 Chicago, Illinois. 60602 Mr. Richard Bax Station Manager Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station 22710 206th Avenue North Cordova, Illinois 61242 Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 22712 206th Avenue North Cordova, Illinois -61242 Chairman Rock Island County Board of Supervisors 1504 3rd Avenue Rock Island County Office Bldg.
Rock Island, Illinois 61201 Mr. Michael C. Parker, Chief Division of Engineering Illinois Department of Nuclear Safety 1035 Outer Park Drive Springfield, Illinois 62704 Regional Administrator, Region III U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Connission 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 l
i i
._--____A
{
December 22, 1987 i
Docket Nos. 50-254, 265, Distribution:
237, 249 Docket File ACRS(10)
NRC & Local PDRs Plant File PDIII-2 r/f JPartlow GHolahan EJordsn LLuther 0GC-Beth.
TRoss i
Mr. L. D. Butterfield, Jr.
i Nuclear Licensing Manager Commonwealth Edison Company P.O. Box 767 Chicago, Illinois 60690
Dear Mr. Butterfield:
SUBJECT:
QUAD CITIES STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 DRESDEN STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 EFFECT OF POSTULATED DC POWER FAILURE
References:
1.
R. F. Janecek letter to T. A. Ippolito dated June 12, 1980 2.
T. A. Ippolito letter to D. L. Peoples dated April 25, 1980 This letter is in response to your December. 22, 1987 letter to T. E. Murley on the subject of the effects of a postulated DC power failure on ECCS performance for Quad Cities Stations Units 1 and 2 and Dresden Station Units 2 and 3.
The staff has reviewed your description of the issue; your understanding of the licensing assumptions involved in demonstrating compliance with 10 CFR 50.46 and 10 CFR 50 Appendix K; your safety analysis addressing Quad Cities Unit I startup and continued safe operation of Quad Cities Unit 2 and Dresden Units 2 and 3; and your commitment to resolve this issue within 60 days either by justification for not considering failures of the DC power supply or by proposing plant modifications and an implementation schedule which would assure acceptable ECCS performance following a LOCA plus loss of offsite power and a DC power supply failure.
On the basis of information currently available including information in references 1 and 2, we cannot conclude at this time that the Quad Cities Units 1 and 2 and Dresden Units 2 and 3 are in compliance with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.46 f
and 10 CFR 50 Appendix K.
In addition, we have reviewed your safety analysis a
for continued operation for 60 days and agree that the low probability of the accident in question and the compensatory measures taken provide adequate i
i m.
...., s.
4 L. D. Butterfield, Jr. projections to assure that there is no undue risk to the public health and safety during this period.
In light of these findings, we conclude that operation of the units in question is acceptable and that any consideration of enforcement action (should a condition of non-compliance be concluded) will be waived by the NRC during this 60 day period.
Upon review of the additional information or plans you provide during these 60 days, we will take the appropriate measures (e.g., temporary exemption if needed) to assure the long term resolution of this issue.
/3 Gary M. Holahan, Assistant Director for Regions III and V Division of Reactor Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation DISTRIBUTION CENTRAL FILE PD3/2 FILE TROSS DMULLER DCRUTCHFIELD GHOLAHAN D3/
PD:
II D TROSS:mk
-DM GHOLAHAN CNORELIUS 12/).2/87 12/*J/87.
12/21/87 12/zt/87 AB B
e FROSA WH0DGES 12ht /87 12 % /87 l
ll.-_--.-
14A 'i
-]
l 14r. L. D. Butterfield, Jr.
l
-Commonwealth Edison Company Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station -
Units 1 and 2 cc:-
Mr. Stephen E. Shelton Vice President.
-Iowa-Illinois Gas and Electric Company P.O. Box 4350 Davenport, Iowa 52808 Mr. Michael Miller Isham,. Lincoln & Beale Three First National Plaza Suite 5200-Chicago, Illinois 60602 Mr. Richard Bax Station Manager Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station 22710 206th Avenue North Cordova, Illinois 61242 Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 22712 206th Avenue North
-Cordova, Illinois :61242 Chairman-Rock Island County Board
. of Supervisors 1504 3rd Avenue Rock Island County Office Bldg.
Rock Island, Illinois 61201 Mr. Michael C. Parker, Chief Division'of Engineering Illinois Department of Nuclear Safety 1035 Outer Park Drive Springfield, Illinois 62704 Regional Administrator, Region III U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137
,. m
~
- ,.s December 22, 1987 Docket Nos. 50-254, 265, Distribution:
237, 249 Docket Fiie ACRS (10)
NRC & Local PDRs Plant File PDIII-2 r/f JPartlow GHolahan EJordan LLuther 0GC-Beth.
TRoss Mr. L. D. Butterfield, Jr.
Nuclear Licensing Manager Commonwealth Edison Company P.O. Box 767 Chicago, Illinois 60690
Dear Mr. Butterfield:
b
SUBJECT:
QUAD CITIES STATION UNITS 1 AND 2, DRESDEN STATION UNIls 2 AND 3 EFFECT OF POSTULATED DC POWER FAILURE
References:
1.
R. F. Janecek letter to T. A. Ippolito dated June 12, 1980 2.
T. A. Ippolito letter to D. L. Peoples dated April 25, 1980 This letter is in response to your December 22, 1987 letter to T. E. Murley on the subject of the effects of a postulated DC power failure on ECCS performance for Quad Cities Stations Units 1 and 2 and Dresden Station Units 2 and 3.
The staff has reviewed your description of the issue; your understanding of the licensing assumptions involved in demonstrating compliance with 10 CFR 50.46 and 10 CFR 50 Appendix K; your safety analysis addressing Quad Cities Unit 1 startup and continued safe operation of Quad Cities Unit 2 and Dresden Units 2 and 3; and your commitment to resolve this issue within 60 days either by justification for not considering failures of the DC power supply or by proposing plant modifications and an implementation schedule which would assure acceptable ECCS performance following a LOCA plus loss of offsite power and a DC power supply failure.
On the basis of information currently available including information in references 1 and 2, we cannot conclude at this time that the Quad Cities Units 1 and 2 and Dresden Units 2 and 3 are in compliance with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.46 and 10 CFR 50 Appendix K.
In addition, we have reviewed your safety analysis for continued operation for 60 days and agree that the low probability of the accident in question and the compensatory measures taken provide adequate
L. D. Butterfield, Jr. l l
projections to assure that there is no undue risk to the public health and safety during this period.
In light of these findings, we conclude that operation of the units in question is acceptable and.that any consideration of enforcement action (should a condition of non-compliance be concluded) will be waived by the NRC during this 60 day period.
Upon review of the. additional information or plans you provide during these 60 days, we will take the appropriate measures (e.g., temporary exemption if needed) to assure the long term resolution of this issue.
Gary M. Holahan, Assistant Director for Regions III and V Division of Reactor Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
-DISTRIBUTION CENTRAL FILE PD3/2 FILE TROSS DMULLER DCRUTCHFIELD D
D:
{
I D TROSS:mk
.DM GHOLAHAN CNORELIUS 12/).3/87 12/+3/87 12/2t/87 12/2t/87 M
B FR05A WH0DGES 12ht./87 12/~/87 1
Nr. L. D. Butterfield, Jr.
Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station Commonwealth Edison Company Units 1 and 2 cc:
Mr. Stephen E. Shelton Vice President Iowa-Illinois Gas and Electric Company P.O. Box 4350 Davenport, Iowa 52808 Mr. Michael Miller Isham, Lincoln & Beale Three First National Plaza Suite 5200 Chicago, Illinois 60602 Mr. Richard Bax Station Manager Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station 22710 206th Avenue North Cordova, Illinois 61242 Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 22712 206th Avenue North Cordova,' Illinois 61242 Chairman Rock Island County Board of Supervisors 1504 3rd Avenue Rock Island County Office Bldg.
Rock Island, Illinois 61201 Mr. Michael C. Parker, Chief Division of Engineering Illinois Department of Nuclear Safety 1035 Outer Park Drive Springfield, Illinois 62704 Regional Administrator, Region III U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137
._e