ML17128A393: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML17128A393 | | number = ML17128A393 | ||
| issue date = 05/08/2017 | | issue date = 05/08/2017 | ||
| title = LIC-109 Acceptance of Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 - License Amendment Request 278 - Risk-Informed Approach to Resolve Construction Truss Design Code Nonconformances - MF9532/33 | | title = NRR E-mail Capture - LIC-109 Acceptance of Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 - License Amendment Request 278 - Risk-Informed Approach to Resolve Construction Truss Design Code Nonconformances - MF9532/33 | ||
| author name = Chawla M | | author name = Chawla M | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIII | | author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIII | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: | {{#Wiki_filter:1 NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: | ||
Chawla, Mahesh Sent: | |||
Monday, May 08, 2017 2:22 PM To: | |||
michael.millen@nexteraenergy.com Cc: | |||
Catron, Steve (Steve.Catron@fpl.com); Christensen, Lori (Lori.Christensen@nexteraenergy.com) | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
LIC-109 Acceptance of Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 - License Amendment Request 278 - Risk-Informed Approach to Resolve Construction Truss Design Code Nonconformances - MF9532/33 | LIC-109 Acceptance of Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 - License Amendment Request 278 - Risk-Informed Approach to Resolve Construction Truss Design Code Nonconformances - MF9532/33 | ||
==Dear Mr. Millen:== | ==Dear Mr. Millen:== | ||
By {{letter dated|date=March 31, 2017|text=letter dated March 31, 2017}} (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) | |||
By letter dated March 31, 2017 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) | |||
Accession No. ML17090A511), NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC (NextEra) (the licensee) submitted a license amendment request (LAR) for Point Beach Nuclear Plant (PBNP), Units 1 and 2. The proposed LAR would document a risk-informed resolution strategy to resolve low risk, legacy design code nonconformances associated with construction trusses in the containment building of PBNP Units 1 and 2. The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this LAR. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | Accession No. ML17090A511), NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC (NextEra) (the licensee) submitted a license amendment request (LAR) for Point Beach Nuclear Plant (PBNP), Units 1 and 2. The proposed LAR would document a risk-informed resolution strategy to resolve low risk, legacy design code nonconformances associated with construction trusses in the containment building of PBNP Units 1 and 2. The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this LAR. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | ||
Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an amendment to the license (including the technical specifications) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations. | Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an amendment to the license (including the technical specifications) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations. | ||
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed LAR in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence. | The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed LAR in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence. | ||
Based on the information provided in your submittal and discussions during the pre-licensing meeting held on July 28, 2015 (see ADAMS Accession No. ML15215A050 for the meeting summary) and on October 18, 2016 (see ADAMS Accession No. ML16305A388 for the meeting summary), the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 1500 hours to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review by March 30, 2019. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager. | Based on the information provided in your submittal and discussions during the pre-licensing meeting held on July 28, 2015 (see ADAMS Accession No. ML15215A050 for the meeting summary) and on October 18, 2016 (see ADAMS Accession No. ML16305A388 for the meeting summary), the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 1500 hours to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review by March 30, 2019. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager. | ||
These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities. | These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities. | ||
If you have any questions, please contact me. | 2 If you have any questions, please contact me. | ||
Mahesh Chawla Project Manager Phone: 301-415-8371 Fax: 301-415-1222 mahesh.chawla@nrc.gov | Mahesh Chawla Project Manager Phone: 301-415-8371 Fax: 301-415-1222 mahesh.chawla@nrc.gov | ||
Hearing Identifier: | Hearing Identifier: | ||
NRR_PMDA Email Number: | |||
3500 Mail Envelope Properties (Mahesh.Chawla@nrc.gov20170508142200) | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
LIC-109 Acceptance of Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 - License Amendment Request 278 - Risk-Informed Approach to Resolve Construction Truss Design Code Nonconformances - MF9532/33 Sent Date: | LIC-109 Acceptance of Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 - License Amendment Request 278 - Risk-Informed Approach to Resolve Construction Truss Design Code Nonconformances - MF9532/33 Sent Date: | ||
5/8/2017 2:22:22 PM Received Date: | |||
5/8/2017 2:22:00 PM From: | |||
Chawla, Mahesh Created By: | |||
Mahesh.Chawla@nrc.gov Recipients: | |||
"Catron, Steve (Steve.Catron@fpl.com)" <Steve.Catron@fpl.com> | "Catron, Steve (Steve.Catron@fpl.com)" <Steve.Catron@fpl.com> | ||
Tracking Status: None "Christensen, Lori (Lori.Christensen@nexteraenergy.com)" <Lori.Christensen@nexteraenergy.com> | Tracking Status: None "Christensen, Lori (Lori.Christensen@nexteraenergy.com)" <Lori.Christensen@nexteraenergy.com> | ||
Tracking Status: None "michael.millen@nexteraenergy.com" <michael.millen@nexteraenergy.com> | Tracking Status: None "michael.millen@nexteraenergy.com" <michael.millen@nexteraenergy.com> | ||
Tracking Status: None Post Office: | Tracking Status: None Post Office: | ||
Files | Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 3577 5/8/2017 2:22:00 PM Options Priority: | ||
Standard Return Notification: | |||
No Reply Requested: | |||
No Sensitivity: | |||
Normal Expiration Date: | |||
Recipients Received:}} | Recipients Received:}} | ||
Latest revision as of 08:39, 9 January 2025
| ML17128A393 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Point Beach |
| Issue date: | 05/08/2017 |
| From: | Mahesh Chawla Plant Licensing Branch III |
| To: | Millen M Point Beach |
| References | |
| MF9533, MF9535 | |
| Download: ML17128A393 (3) | |
Text
1 NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:
Chawla, Mahesh Sent:
Monday, May 08, 2017 2:22 PM To:
michael.millen@nexteraenergy.com Cc:
Catron, Steve (Steve.Catron@fpl.com); Christensen, Lori (Lori.Christensen@nexteraenergy.com)
Subject:
LIC-109 Acceptance of Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 - License Amendment Request 278 - Risk-Informed Approach to Resolve Construction Truss Design Code Nonconformances - MF9532/33
Dear Mr. Millen:
By letter dated March 31, 2017 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS)
Accession No. ML17090A511), NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC (NextEra) (the licensee) submitted a license amendment request (LAR) for Point Beach Nuclear Plant (PBNP), Units 1 and 2. The proposed LAR would document a risk-informed resolution strategy to resolve low risk, legacy design code nonconformances associated with construction trusses in the containment building of PBNP Units 1 and 2. The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this LAR. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an amendment to the license (including the technical specifications) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed LAR in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
Based on the information provided in your submittal and discussions during the pre-licensing meeting held on July 28, 2015 (see ADAMS Accession No. ML15215A050 for the meeting summary) and on October 18, 2016 (see ADAMS Accession No. ML16305A388 for the meeting summary), the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 1500 hours0.0174 days <br />0.417 hours <br />0.00248 weeks <br />5.7075e-4 months <br /> to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review by March 30, 2019. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager.
These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities.
2 If you have any questions, please contact me.
Mahesh Chawla Project Manager Phone: 301-415-8371 Fax: 301-415-1222 mahesh.chawla@nrc.gov
Hearing Identifier:
NRR_PMDA Email Number:
3500 Mail Envelope Properties (Mahesh.Chawla@nrc.gov20170508142200)
Subject:
LIC-109 Acceptance of Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 - License Amendment Request 278 - Risk-Informed Approach to Resolve Construction Truss Design Code Nonconformances - MF9532/33 Sent Date:
5/8/2017 2:22:22 PM Received Date:
5/8/2017 2:22:00 PM From:
Chawla, Mahesh Created By:
Mahesh.Chawla@nrc.gov Recipients:
"Catron, Steve (Steve.Catron@fpl.com)" <Steve.Catron@fpl.com>
Tracking Status: None "Christensen, Lori (Lori.Christensen@nexteraenergy.com)" <Lori.Christensen@nexteraenergy.com>
Tracking Status: None "michael.millen@nexteraenergy.com" <michael.millen@nexteraenergy.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 3577 5/8/2017 2:22:00 PM Options Priority:
Standard Return Notification:
No Reply Requested:
No Sensitivity:
Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received: