ML110250136: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION I 475 ALLENDALE ROAD KING OF PRUSSIA. PA 19406.1415 January 25, 2011 EA-10-196 Mr. Paul Freeman Site Vice President Seabrook Nuclear Power Plant NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC.c/o Mr. Michael O'Keefe P.O. Box 300 Seabrook, NH 03874 | {{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION I 475 ALLENDALE ROAD KING OF PRUSSIA. PA 19406.1415 January 25, 2011 EA-10-196 Mr. Paul Freeman Site Vice President Seabrook Nuclear Power Plant NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC. | ||
c/o Mr. Michael O'Keefe P.O. Box 300 Seabrook, NH 03874 | |||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
| Line 24: | Line 25: | ||
==Dear Mr. Freeman:== | ==Dear Mr. Freeman:== | ||
On January 11,2011, the NIC issued you a letter documenting the results of an investigation conducted by the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC's) Office of Investigations (Ol)at Seabrook Station (Seabrook). | |||
The purpose of the investigation was to determine whether a contract employee working for TSSD Services Inc. (TSSD), at Seabrook, deliberately failed to report an arrest in accordance with the Seabrook Physical Security Plan (PSP) requirements. | On January 11,2011, the NIC issued you a letter documenting the results of an investigation conducted by the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC's) Office of Investigations (Ol) at Seabrook Station (Seabrook). The purpose of the investigation was to determine whether a contract employee working for TSSD Services Inc. (TSSD), at Seabrook, deliberately failed to report an arrest in accordance with the Seabrook Physical Security Plan (PSP) requirements. | ||
The Janua ry 11 , 2011 ,letter stated that the contract employee deliberately failed to report an arrest during his employment for TSSD at Seabrook when, in fact, the employee did report the arrest, although he failed to do so until approximately four months after it occurred. | The Janua ry 11 , 2011 ,letter stated that the contract employee deliberately failed to report an arrest during his employment for TSSD at Seabrook when, in fact, the employee did report the arrest, although he failed to do so until approximately four months after it occurred. As indicated in our January 11,2011, letter, the NRC concluded that the contract employee deliberately violated NRC requirements and Seabrook's operating license and PSP by not reporting the arrest in a timely manner. A Seabrook PSP implementing procedure, Al-014, Rev. 4, "Arrest Reporting," required immediate notification of any legal action such as an arrest, criminal charges, criminal convictions or proceedings to Seabrook Nuclear Security. | ||
As indicated in our January 11,2011, letter, the NRC concluded that the contract employee deliberately violated NRC requirements and Seabrook's operating license and PSP by not reporting the arrest in a timely manner. A Seabrook PSP implementing procedure, Al-014, Rev. 4, "Arrest Reporting," required immediate notification of any legal action such as an arrest, criminal charges, criminal convictions or proceedings to Seabrook Nuclear Security.Please replace the first page of the January 11,2011, letter with the enclosed corrected copy of that page. We apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused you. Should you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Mr. Arthur Burritt, Chief Division of Reactor Projects Branch 3, NRC Region l, at 610-337-5069. | Please replace the first page of the January 11,2011, letter with the enclosed corrected copy of that page. We apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused you. Should you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Mr. Arthur Burritt, Chief Division of Reactor Projects Branch 3, NRC Region l, at 610-337-5069. | ||
P. Freeman 2 ln accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRC's document system (ADAMS) accessible from the NRC Web site at http: //www. n rc. oov/read | |||
htm L Sincerely, I Division of Reactor Projects NRC Region I Docket No. 50-443 License No. NPF-86 | P. Freeman 2 ln accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRC's document system (ADAMS) accessible from the NRC Web site at http: //www. n rc. oov/read nq-rm/adams. htm L i | ||
Sincerely, I | |||
Division of Reactor Projects NRC Region I Docket No. 50-443 License No. NPF-86 | |||
==Enclosure:== | ==Enclosure:== | ||
As stated cc: Distribution via ListServ P. Freeman ln accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRC's document system (ADAMS) accessible from the NRC Web site at http: //www. n rc. q ovlre a d | As stated cc: Distribution via ListServ | ||
P. Freeman ln accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRC's document system (ADAMS) accessible from the NRC Web site at http: //www. n rc. q ovlre a d n o-rm/a d a m s. htm l. | |||
i Sincerely, | |||
/RA/ | |||
James W. Clifford, Acting Director Division of Reactor Projects NRC Region I Docket No. 50-443 License No. NPF-86 | |||
==Enclosure:== | ==Enclosure:== | ||
As stated cc: Distribution via ListServ SUNSI Review Complete: MMM (Reviewer's lnitials) MLl10250136 DOC NAME:S:\Entallg\Enforcement\Proposed-Actions\Regionl\EA-10-196 Conected Copy SB Anest report.docx After declaring this document "An Official Agency Record" it will be released to the Public. | |||
To receive a copy of this document, indicate in box: "C" = Copy w/o attachmenUenclosure 'E' = Copy dattachmenUenclosure "N' = No copy | |||
)FFICE RI/ORA RI/DRP RUORA RI/ORA OE iAME M McLauqhlin/ MMM' A BurritUALB* ( Farrarl KLF* D Holody/ DJH. D Furst via email** | |||
)ATE 01t20t1'l 01t21t1'l 01t21tl'l 01124t11 0'U24t11 | |||
)FFICE RUDRP | |||
{AME J Clifford/JW0 | |||
)ATE 01124t1'l | |||
. See previous sheet for concurren@ OFFICIAL RECORD COPY ** concurred via email | |||
ENCLOSURE UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMM ISSION REGION I 475 ALLENDALE ROAD KJNG OF PRTJSSIA, PENNSYLVANIA I9406-I4I5 January 11,2011 EA-10-196 Mr. Paul Freeman Site Vice President Seabrook Nuclear Power Plant NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC. | |||
c/o Mr. Michael O'Keefe P.O. Box 300 Seabrook, NH 03874 | |||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
| Line 47: | Line 60: | ||
==Dear Mr. Freeman:== | ==Dear Mr. Freeman:== | ||
This letter refers to the investigation by the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC)Office of lnvestigations (Ol) completed on September 22,2010, at Seabrook Station (Seabrook). | |||
The purpose of the investigation was to determine whether a contract employee working for TSSD Services Inc. (TSSD), at Seabrook, deliberately failed to report an arrest in accordance with the Seabrook Physical Security Plan requirements. | This letter refers to the investigation by the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC) | ||
As a result of the investigation, the NRC confirmed that the contract employee, who had unescorted access to vital areas of the plant, deliberately failed to report an arrest during his employment for TSSD at Seabrook until approximately four months after it occurred. | Office of lnvestigations (Ol) completed on September 22,2010, at Seabrook Station (Seabrook). The purpose of the investigation was to determine whether a contract employee working for TSSD Services Inc. (TSSD), at Seabrook, deliberately failed to report an arrest in accordance with the Seabrook Physical Security Plan requirements. | ||
The contra-ct employee's actions caused NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC (NextEra) to be in violation of License Condition 2.Eof the Seabrook operating license, Section 9.1 of the Seabrook Station physical Security Plan (SSPSP), and SSPSP implementing procedure Al-014, Rev. 4, "Arrest Reporting." Specifically, the contract employee was required to make immediate notification of any legaiaction such as an arrest, criminal charges, criminal convictions or proceedings to Seabrook Nuclear Security that may have impact upon the trustworthiness or reliability of the individual. | As a result of the investigation, the NRC confirmed that the contract employee, who had unescorted access to vital areas of the plant, deliberately failed to report an arrest during his employment for TSSD at Seabrook until approximately four months after it occurred. The contra-ct employee's actions caused NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC (NextEra) to be in violation of License Condition 2.Eof the Seabrook operating license, Section 9.1 of the Seabrook Station physical Security Plan (SSPSP), and SSPSP implementing procedure Al-014, Rev. 4, "Arrest Reporting." Specifically, the contract employee was required to make immediate notification of any legaiaction such as an arrest, criminal charges, criminal convictions or proceedings to Seabrook Nuclear Security that may have impact upon the trustworthiness or reliability of the individual. The NRC determined that the contract employee's failure to timely report the arrest that may have had an impact on his trustworthiness or reliability caused Seabrook to be in violation of its SecuritY Plan. | ||
The NRC determined that the contract employee's failure to timely report the arrest that may have had an impact on his trustworthiness or reliability caused Seabrook to be in violation of its SecuritY Plan.Since the actions of the contractor were deliberate, he violated the NRC's deliberate misconduct rule (10 CFR 50.5) that prohibits employees from engaging in deliberate misconduct that would cause a licensee to be in violation of NRC requirements' Because you are responsible for the actions of your employees, and because the violation involved willful aspects, the violation was evaluated under the NRC's traditional enforcement process as set forth in the NRC Enforcement Policy. The NRC determined that the violation was similar to Enforcement Policy violation example 6.11 .c.7 , "(a) reviewing official relies on a deliberate falsification of information to make an unescorted access (UA) or unescorted access authorization (UAA) determination," in that it involves the continuation of UAA based on a deliberate failure to provide information that could impact UAA. Although this type of violation would normally be assessed at Severity Level (SL) lll, the NRC considered that the individual was not a licensee official or supervisor, and therefore, the regulatory significance of the}} | Since the actions of the contractor were deliberate, he violated the NRC's deliberate misconduct rule (10 CFR 50.5) that prohibits employees from engaging in deliberate misconduct that would cause a licensee to be in violation of NRC requirements' Because you are responsible for the actions of your employees, and because the violation involved willful aspects, the violation was evaluated under the NRC's traditional enforcement process as set forth in the NRC Enforcement Policy. The NRC determined that the violation was similar to Enforcement Policy violation example 6.11 .c.7 , "(a) reviewing official relies on a deliberate falsification of information to make an unescorted access (UA) or unescorted access authorization (UAA) determination," in that it involves the continuation of UAA based on a deliberate failure to provide information that could impact UAA. Although this type of violation would normally be assessed at Severity Level (SL) lll, the NRC considered that the individual was not a licensee official or supervisor, and therefore, the regulatory significance of the}} | ||
Latest revision as of 04:16, 13 November 2019
| ML110250136 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05000433 |
| Issue date: | 01/25/2011 |
| From: | Clifford J Division Reactor Projects I |
| To: | Freeman P NextEra Energy Seabrook |
| BURRITT AL | |
| References | |
| EA-10-196, OIR-1-2010-030 | |
| Download: ML110250136 (5) | |
Text
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION I 475 ALLENDALE ROAD KING OF PRUSSIA. PA 19406.1415 January 25, 2011 EA-10-196 Mr. Paul Freeman Site Vice President Seabrook Nuclear Power Plant NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC.
c/o Mr. Michael O'Keefe P.O. Box 300 Seabrook, NH 03874
SUBJECT:
CORRECTION TO NRC LETTER DATED JANUARY 11, 2011, RE NRC INVESTIGATION REPORT NO. 1-2010-O3O
Dear Mr. Freeman:
On January 11,2011, the NIC issued you a letter documenting the results of an investigation conducted by the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC's) Office of Investigations (Ol) at Seabrook Station (Seabrook). The purpose of the investigation was to determine whether a contract employee working for TSSD Services Inc. (TSSD), at Seabrook, deliberately failed to report an arrest in accordance with the Seabrook Physical Security Plan (PSP) requirements.
The Janua ry 11 , 2011 ,letter stated that the contract employee deliberately failed to report an arrest during his employment for TSSD at Seabrook when, in fact, the employee did report the arrest, although he failed to do so until approximately four months after it occurred. As indicated in our January 11,2011, letter, the NRC concluded that the contract employee deliberately violated NRC requirements and Seabrook's operating license and PSP by not reporting the arrest in a timely manner. A Seabrook PSP implementing procedure, Al-014, Rev. 4, "Arrest Reporting," required immediate notification of any legal action such as an arrest, criminal charges, criminal convictions or proceedings to Seabrook Nuclear Security.
Please replace the first page of the January 11,2011, letter with the enclosed corrected copy of that page. We apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused you. Should you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Mr. Arthur Burritt, Chief Division of Reactor Projects Branch 3, NRC Region l, at 610-337-5069.
P. Freeman 2 ln accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRC's document system (ADAMS) accessible from the NRC Web site at http: //www. n rc. oov/read nq-rm/adams. htm L i
Sincerely, I
Division of Reactor Projects NRC Region I Docket No. 50-443 License No. NPF-86
Enclosure:
As stated cc: Distribution via ListServ
P. Freeman ln accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRC's document system (ADAMS) accessible from the NRC Web site at http: //www. n rc. q ovlre a d n o-rm/a d a m s. htm l.
i Sincerely,
/RA/
James W. Clifford, Acting Director Division of Reactor Projects NRC Region I Docket No. 50-443 License No. NPF-86
Enclosure:
As stated cc: Distribution via ListServ SUNSI Review Complete: MMM (Reviewer's lnitials) MLl10250136 DOC NAME:S:\Entallg\Enforcement\Proposed-Actions\Regionl\EA-10-196 Conected Copy SB Anest report.docx After declaring this document "An Official Agency Record" it will be released to the Public.
To receive a copy of this document, indicate in box: "C" = Copy w/o attachmenUenclosure 'E' = Copy dattachmenUenclosure "N' = No copy
)FFICE RI/ORA RI/DRP RUORA RI/ORA OE iAME M McLauqhlin/ MMM' A BurritUALB* ( Farrarl KLF* D Holody/ DJH. D Furst via email**
)ATE 01t20t1'l 01t21t1'l 01t21tl'l 01124t11 0'U24t11
)FFICE RUDRP
{AME J Clifford/JW0
)ATE 01124t1'l
. See previous sheet for concurren@ OFFICIAL RECORD COPY ** concurred via email
ENCLOSURE UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMM ISSION REGION I 475 ALLENDALE ROAD KJNG OF PRTJSSIA, PENNSYLVANIA I9406-I4I5 January 11,2011 EA-10-196 Mr. Paul Freeman Site Vice President Seabrook Nuclear Power Plant NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC.
c/o Mr. Michael O'Keefe P.O. Box 300 Seabrook, NH 03874
SUBJECT:
NRC INVESTIGATION REPORT NO. 1-2010-030
Dear Mr. Freeman:
This letter refers to the investigation by the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC)
Office of lnvestigations (Ol) completed on September 22,2010, at Seabrook Station (Seabrook). The purpose of the investigation was to determine whether a contract employee working for TSSD Services Inc. (TSSD), at Seabrook, deliberately failed to report an arrest in accordance with the Seabrook Physical Security Plan requirements.
As a result of the investigation, the NRC confirmed that the contract employee, who had unescorted access to vital areas of the plant, deliberately failed to report an arrest during his employment for TSSD at Seabrook until approximately four months after it occurred. The contra-ct employee's actions caused NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC (NextEra) to be in violation of License Condition 2.Eof the Seabrook operating license, Section 9.1 of the Seabrook Station physical Security Plan (SSPSP), and SSPSP implementing procedure Al-014, Rev. 4, "Arrest Reporting." Specifically, the contract employee was required to make immediate notification of any legaiaction such as an arrest, criminal charges, criminal convictions or proceedings to Seabrook Nuclear Security that may have impact upon the trustworthiness or reliability of the individual. The NRC determined that the contract employee's failure to timely report the arrest that may have had an impact on his trustworthiness or reliability caused Seabrook to be in violation of its SecuritY Plan.
Since the actions of the contractor were deliberate, he violated the NRC's deliberate misconduct rule (10 CFR 50.5) that prohibits employees from engaging in deliberate misconduct that would cause a licensee to be in violation of NRC requirements' Because you are responsible for the actions of your employees, and because the violation involved willful aspects, the violation was evaluated under the NRC's traditional enforcement process as set forth in the NRC Enforcement Policy. The NRC determined that the violation was similar to Enforcement Policy violation example 6.11 .c.7 , "(a) reviewing official relies on a deliberate falsification of information to make an unescorted access (UA) or unescorted access authorization (UAA) determination," in that it involves the continuation of UAA based on a deliberate failure to provide information that could impact UAA. Although this type of violation would normally be assessed at Severity Level (SL) lll, the NRC considered that the individual was not a licensee official or supervisor, and therefore, the regulatory significance of the