ML18334A121

Minutes: Oklahoma Impep MRB Meeting, November 20, 2018

ML18334A121
Person / Time
Issue date:	11/30/2018
From:	NRC/NMSS/DMSST/ASPB
To:
Johnson R
References
Download: ML18334A121 (4)

Text

MINUTES: MANAGEMENT REVIEW BOARD MEETING MINUTES OF OKLAHOMA NOVEMBER 20, 2018 The attendees were as follows:

In person at U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Headquarters in Rockville, Maryland:

Daniel Dorman, MRB Chair, OEDO Paul Michalak, NMSS Scott Moore, MRB Member, NMSS Duncan White, NMSS Tison Campbell, MRB Member, OGC John Miller, Team Member, Region I Kevin Williams, NMSS Jennifer Scro, OGC Mike Broderick, OK By Skype:

David Lew, MRB Member, Region I Michelle Beardsley, NMSS James Trapp, Region I Daichi Saitio, Region I By telephone:

Steve Harrison, MRB Member, VA, OAS Robert Johnson, NMSS Bryan Parker, Team Leader, Region III Michelle Brewer, OK Lizette Roldán-Otero, Team Member, NMSS Keisha Cornelius, OK Jackie Cook, Team Member, RIV Jennifer McAllister, OK Brandon Juran, Team Member, MN Libby McCaskill, OK Troy Pruett, Region IV Kevin Sampson, OK Christina England, OGC

1. Convention: Mr. Duncan White convened the meeting at approximately 1:00 p.m. (ET).

He noted that this Management Review Board (MRB) meeting was open to the public.

Introductions of the attendees were conducted.

2. Oklahoma IMPEP Review: Mr. Bryan Parker, Team Leader, led the presentation for the results of the Oklahoma IMPEP review to the MRB. He summarized the review and the teams findings for the indicators reviewed. The on-site review was conducted by a team composed of technical staff members from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and the State of Minnesota during the period of September 24-28, 2018. A draft report was issued to Oklahoma for factual comment on October 17, 2018. Mr. Parker reported that the team found Oklahomas performance satisfactory for all indicators reviewed.

3. Performance Indicators:

a. Dr. Lizette Roldán-Otero reviewed and presented the non-common performance indicator, Compatibility Requirements. Her presentation corresponded to Section 4.1 of the proposed final IMPEP report. The MRB, the team, and Oklahoma representatives discussed the States regulation adoption process, including the timeliness of adopting regulations.

Oklahoma MRB Meeting Minutes Page 2 The team found Oklahomas performance with respect to this indicator to be satisfactory and the MRB agreed.

b. Mr. Parker reviewed and presented the common performance indicator, Technical Staffing and Training. His presentation corresponded to Section 3.1 of the proposed final IMPEP report. The MRB, the team, and Oklahoma representatives briefly discussed the status of technical staffing and training during the review period and the impact of vacancies on the Agreement State Program.

The team found Oklahomas performance with respect to this indicator to be satisfactory and the MRB agreed.

c. Mr. John Miller reviewed and presented the common performance indicator, Status of Materials Inspection Program. His presentation corresponded to Section 3.2 of the proposed final IMPEP report. The MRB, the team, and Oklahoma representatives discussed timeliness of inspection documentation, and factors that may have contributed to delinquent inspection documentation during the review period. Also discussed, was the teams recommendation that Oklahoma develop a strategy to improve the timeliness of inspection documentation and assure that future inspection documentation is issued within 30 days.

The team found Oklahomas performance with respect to this indicator to be satisfactory and the MRB agreed. The MRB also agreed with the teams recommendation.

d. Mr. Miller also reviewed and presented the common performance indicator, Technical Quality of Inspections. His presentation corresponded to Section 3.3 of the proposed final IMPEP report. The MRB, the team, and Oklahoma representatives discussed the technical quality of Oklahomas inspection program and the lack of any significant issues with technical quality.

The team found Oklahomas performance with respect to this indicator to be satisfactory and the MRB agreed.

e. Ms. Jackie Cook reviewed and presented the common performance indicator, Technical Quality of Licensing Actions. Her presentation corresponded to Section 3.4 of the proposed final IMPEP report. The MRB, the team, and Oklahoma representatives discussed the technical quality of the programs licensing actions and the Programs adoption of a peer review process to help ensure future renewals appropriately document inspection and enforcement history.

The team found Oklahomas performance with respect to this indicator to be satisfactory and the MRB agreed.

Oklahoma MRB Meeting Minutes Page 3

f. Mr. Brandon Juran reviewed and presented the common performance indicator, Technical Quality of Incident and Allegation Activities. His presentation corresponded to Section 3.5 of the proposed final IMPEP report. The MRB, the team, and Oklahoma representatives discussed the effectiveness of the Programs Incident and Allegation Activities, and the lack of any significant issues with the Programs Incident and Allegation Activities. Also discussed, was the teams recommendation to close the 2014 IMPEP recommendation to provide additional staff training to ensure consistent, timely, and accurate reporting and follow-up of incidents.

The team found Oklahomas performance with respect to this indicator to be satisfactory and the MRB agreed. The MRB also agreed with the teams recommendation to close the 2014 IMPEP recommendation.

4. MRB Consultation/Comments on Issuance of Report: The team recommended, and the MRB agreed, that the Oklahoma Agreement State Program be found adequate to protect public health and safety and compatible with the NRC's program. Since this was the second consecutive review in which Oklahoma was found satisfactory for all performance indicators, the team recommended, and the MRB agreed, that the next IMPEP review take place in approximately 5 years with a periodic meeting in approximately 2.5 years. The final report may be found in the ADAMS using the Accession Number ML18331A351.

5. Precedents/Lessons Learned: None

6. Comments from Members of the Public. None

7. Adjournment. The meeting was adjourned at approximately 2:10 p.m. (ET)

SUMMARY

OF NOVEMBER 20, 2018, OKLAHOMA MRB MEETING ML18334A121 OFFICE MSST/ASPB MSST/ASPB NAME KMeyer RJohnson DATE 11/30/18 11/30/18 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY