ML13329A854: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:ENCLOSURE 2 VOLUME 4 SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 IMPROVED TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS CONVERSION  
{{#Wiki_filter:Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 1 of 38 ENCLOSURE 2 VOLUME 4 SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 IMPROVED TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS CONVERSION ITS CHAPTER 2.0 SAFETY LIMITS Revision 0 Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 1 of 38


ITS CHAPTER 2.0 SAFETY LIMITS  
Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 2 of 38 LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
: 1. ITS Chapter 2.0, Safety Limits Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 2 of 38
, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 3 of 38 ATTACHMENT 1 ITS Chapter 2.0, SAFETY LIMITS (SLs) , Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 3 of 38


Revision 0  
Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 4 of 38 Current Technical Specification (CTS) Markup and Discussion of Changes (DOCs)
Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 4 of 38


LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 5 of 38 A01 ITS                                                                                                              ITS Chapter 2.0 2.0 SAFETY LIMITS AND LIMITING SAFETY SYSTEM SETTINGS 2.1          2.1 SAFETY LIMITS REACTOR CORE 2.1.1        2.1.1 The combination of THERMAL POWER, pressurizer pressure, and the highest operating loop coolant temperature (Tavg) shall not exceed the limits shown in Figure 2.1-1 and the following SLs shall not be exceeded:.                                            in the COLR                    LA01 2.1.1.1 The departure from nucleate boiling ratio (DNBR) shall be maintained  1.132 for the BHTP correlation,  1.21 for the BWU-N correlation, and  1.21 for the BWCMV correlation.
: 1. ITS Chapter 2.0, Safety Limits
2.1.1.2 The maximum local fuel pin centerline temperature shall be maintained  4901°F, decreasing by 13.7°F per 10,000 MWD/MTU of burnup for COPERNIC applications, and 4642°F, decreasing by 58°F per 10,000 MWD/MTU of burnup for TACO3 applications.
Applicability APPLICABILITY: MODES 1 and 2.
ACTION:
2.2.1        If SL 2.1.1 is violated, restore compliance and be in HOT STANDBY within 1 hour.
REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM PRESSURE 2.1.2        2.1.2 The Reactor Coolant System pressure shall not exceed 2735 psig.
Applicability APPLICABILITY: MODES 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.
ACTION:
2.2.2.1      MODES 1 and 2 2.2.2.1              Whenever the Reactor Coolant System pressure has exceeded 2735 psig, be in HOT STANDBY with the Reactor Coolant System pressure within its limit within 1 hour.
2.2.2.2      MODES 3, 4 and 5 2.2.2.2              Whenever the Reactor Coolant System pressure has exceeded 2735 psig, reduce the Reactor Coolant System pressure to within its limit within 5 minutes.
September 26, 2012 SEQUOYAH - UNIT 1                                  2-1                            Amendment No. 41, 331 Page 1 of 6 Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 5 of 38


ATTACHMENT 1 ITS Chapter 2.0, SAFETY LIMITS (SLs)
Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 6 of 38 ITS                                                                                    ITS Chapter 2.0 Figure 2.1 1 Reaeter Cere Safety timit Feur teeps in Operatien UNACCEPTABLE OPERATION ACCEPTABLE OPERATION September 26,2012 SEQUOYAH - UNIT 1                      2-2                        Amendment No. 19, 331 Page 2 of 6 Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 6 of 38


Current Technical Specification (CTS) Markup and Discussion of Changes (DOCs)
Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 7 of 38 A01 ITS                                                                      ITS Chapter 2.0 This page deleted.
A01ITS ITS Chapter 2.0 2.0  SAFETY LIMITS AND LIMITING SAFETY SYSTEM SETTINGS
September 3, 1985 SEQUOYAH - UNIT 1                     2-3                    Amendment No. 41 Page 3 of 6 Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 7 of 38
 
===2.1 SAFETY===
LIMITS REACTOR CORE 2.1.1  The combination of THERMAL POWER, pressurizer pressure, and the highest  operating loop coolant temperature (Tavg) shall not exceed the limits shown in Figure 2.1
-1 and the following SLs shall not be exceeded:.
2.1.1.1 The departure from nucleate boiling ratio (DNBR) shall be maintained  1.132 for the BHTP correlation, 1.21 for the BWU-N correlation, and  1.21 for the BWCMV correlation.


Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 8 of 38 A01 ITS                                                                                                          ITS Chapter 2.0 2.0 SAFETY LIMITS AND LIMITING SAFETY SYSTEM SETTINGS 2.1          2.1 SAFETY LIMITS REACTOR CORE 2.1.1        2.1.1 The combination of THERMAL POWER, pressurizer pressure, and the highest operating loop coolant temperature (Tavg) shall not exceed the limits shown in Figure 2.1-1 and the following SLs shall not be exceeded:                                                  in the COLR                                  LA01 2.1.1.1 The departure from nucleate boiling ratio (DNBR) shall be maintained  1.132 for the BHTP correlation,  1.21 for the BWU-N correlation, and  1.21 for the BWCMV correlation.
2.1.1.2 The maximum local fuel pin centerline temperature shall be maintained  4901°F, decreasing by 13.7°F per 10,000 MWD/MTU of burnup for COPERNIC applications, and 4642°F, decreasing by 58°F per 10,000 MWD/MTU of burnup for TACO3 applications.
2.1.1.2 The maximum local fuel pin centerline temperature shall be maintained  4901°F, decreasing by 13.7°F per 10,000 MWD/MTU of burnup for COPERNIC applications, and 4642°F, decreasing by 58°F per 10,000 MWD/MTU of burnup for TACO3 applications.
APPLICABILITY
Applicability APPLICABILITY: MODES 1 and 2.
: MODES 1 and 2.
ACTION:
ACTION:
If SL 2.1.1 is violated, restore compliance and be in HOT STANDBY within 1 hour.  
2.2.1          If SL 2.1.1 is violated, restore compliance and be in HOT STANDBY within 1 hour.
 
REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM PRESSURE 2.1.2        2.1.2 The Reactor Coolant System pressure shall not exceed 2735 psig.
REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM PRESSURE
Applicability APPLICABILITY: MODES 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.
 
2.1.2  The Reactor Coolant System pressure shall not exceed 2735 psig. 
 
APPLICABILITY:  MODES 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. 
 
ACTION:    MODES 1 and 2 Whenever the Reactor Coolant System pressure has exceeded 2735 psig, be in HOT STANDBY with the Reactor Coolant System pressure within its limit within 1 hour.
 
MODES 3, 4 and 5
 
Whenever the Reactor Coolant System pressure has exceeded 2735 psig, reduce the Reactor Coolant System pressure to within its limit within 5 minutes.
 
September 26, 2012 SEQUOYAH - UNIT 1 2-1 Amendment No. 41, 331 2.1 2.1.1 Applicability 2.2.1 2.2.2.1 2.2.2.2 in the COLR LA01 Page 1 of 6 2.1.2 2.2.2.2 2.2.2.1 Applicabilit y
ITS Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 6 of 38ITS Chapter 2.0 September 26,2012Amendment No.
19, 331 Figure 2.1 1 Reaeter Cere Safety timit Feur teeps in Operatien SEQUOYAH - UNIT 1 2-2 UNACCEPTABLE OPERATION ACCEPTABLE OPERATION Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 6 of 38 Page 2 of 6 A01ITS ITS Chapter 2.0
 
This page deleted. 
 
September 3, 1985 SEQUOYAH - UNIT 1 2-3         Amendment No. 41 Page 3 of 6 A01ITS Chapter 2.0 ITS 2.0  SAFETY LIMITS AND LIMITING SAFETY SYSTEM SETTINGS
 
===2.1 SAFETY===
LIMITS REACTOR CORE
 
2.1.1  The combination of THERMAL POWER, pressurizer pressure, and the highest operating loop coolant temperature (Tavg) shall not exceed the limits shown in Figure 2.1
-1 and the following SLs shall not be exceeded:
 
2.1.1.1 The departure from nucleate boiling ratio (DNBR) shall be maintained  1.132 for the BHTP correlation,  1.21 for the BWU-N correlation, and  1.21 for the BWCMV correlation.
 
2.1.1.2 The maximum local fuel pin centerline temperature shall be maintained  4901°F, decreasing by 13.7°F per 10,000 MWD/MTU of burnup for COPERNIC applications, and  4642°F, decreasing by 58°F per 10,000 MWD/MTU of burnup for TACO3 applications.
APPLICABILITY:  MODES 1 and 2.
 
ACTION:  If SL 2.1.1 is violated, restore compliance and be in HOT STANDBY within 1 hour.
 
REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM PRESSURE
 
2.1.2  The Reactor Coolant System pressure shall not exceed 2735 psig.  
 
APPLICABILITY
: MODES 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.
ACTION:
ACTION:
MODES 1 and 2 Whenever the Reactor Coolant System pressure has exceeded 2735 psig, be in HOT STANDBY with the Reactor Coolant System pressure within its limit within 1 hour.  
2.2.2.1      MODES 1 and 2 2.2.2.1                Whenever the Reactor Coolant System pressure has exceeded 2735 psig, be in HOT STANDBY with the Reactor Coolant System pressure within its limit within 1 hour.
 
2.2.2.2      MODES 3, 4 and 5 Whenever the Reactor Coolant System pressure has exceeded 2735 psig, reduce the Reactor 2.2.2.2 Coolant System pressure to within its limit within 5 minutes.
MODES 3, 4 and 5  
SEQUOYAH - UNIT 2                                   2-1                                 September 26, 2012 Amendment No. 33, 324 Page 4 of 6 Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 8 of 38
 
Whenever the Reactor Coolant System pressure has exceeded 2735 psig, reduce the Reactor Coolant System pressure to within its limit within 5 minutes.  
 
SEQUOYAH - UNIT 2   2-1           September 26, 2012 Amendment No. 33, 324 2.1 2.1.1 Applicabilit y 2.2.1 2.1.2 2.2.2.1 2.2.2.1 2.2.2.2 2.2.2.2 in the COLR LA01 Page 4 of 6 Applicabilit y
ITS Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page I of 38 (D Figure 2.1 1 Reaeter Cere Safety timit Feur teeps in Operatien 6n 600 IL g-'o F I U'(J E 680 660 640 580 560 540 FRACTION OF RATED THERMAL POWER 2-2 September 26,2012 Amendment No. 21 ,324 LE UNACCEPTAB OPERATIOT\
\\\\24OO psia\2250 psia\\\\- 1985 psia\\\\.\\\\1775 psra\\\\-\ACCEPTABLE OPERATION\\SEQUOYAH - UNIT 2 Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page I of 38 Page 5 of 6 ITS Chapter 2.0 A01ITS Chapter 2.0 ITS   
 
This page deleted.
 
September 3, 1985 SEQUOYAH - UNIT 2    2-3            Amendment No. 33 Page 6 of 6 DISCUSSION OF CHANGES ITS CHAPTER 2.0, SAFETY LIMITS (SLs)
Sequoyah Unit 1 and Unit 2 Page 1 of 2 ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES A01 In the conversion of the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant (SQN) Current Technical Specifications (CTS) to the plant specific Improved Technical Specifications (ITS), certain changes (wording preferences, editorial changes, reformatting, revised numbering, etc.) are made to obtain consistency with NUREG-1431, Rev. 4.0, "Standard Technical Specifications - Westinghouse Plants" (ISTS) and additional Technical Specification Task Force (TSTF) travelers included in this
 
submittal.
 
These changes are designated as administrative changes and are acceptable because they do not result in technical changes to the CTS.
 
MORE RESTRICTIVE CHANGES None 
 
RELOCATED SPECIFICATIONS
 
None REMOVED DETAIL CHANGES
 
LA01 (Type 6 - Removal of Cycle - Specific Limits from the Technical Specifications to the Core Operating Limits Report)  CTS 2.1.1 requires the combination of THERMAL POWER, pressurizer pressure, and the highest operating loop coolant temperature (Tavg) not to exceed the limits shown in Figure 2.1-1. ITS 2.1.1 states the combination of THERMAL POWER, Reactor Coolant System (RCS) highest loop average temperature, and pressurizer pressure shall not exceed the limits specified in the COLR. This changes the CTS by moving limits that must be confirmed on a cycle specific bases to the COLR. The Reactor Core safety limits are retained in Technical Specification Chapter 2.0.
 
The removal of these cycle specific parameter limits from the Technical Specifications to the COLR and the retention of the limiting Safety Limits in the Technical Specifications is acceptable because the cycle specific limits are developed or utilized under NRC-approved methodologies that ensure the Safety Limits are met. The NRC documented in Generic Letter 88-16, "Removal of Cycle-Specific Parameter Limits From Technical Specifications," that this type of information is not necessary to be included in the Technical Specifications to provide adequate protection of public health and safety. The ITS still retains the Safety Limits. NRC-approved Topical Report WCAP-14483-A, "Generic Methodology for Expanded Core Operating Limits Report," determined that the specific values for these parameters may be relocated to the COLR provided the SLs continue to appear in the Technical Specifications. The methodologies used to develop the parameters in the COLR were approved by the NRC in accordance with Generic Letter 88-16. Additionally, this change is acceptable because the removed information will be adequately controlled in the COLR DISCUSSION OF CHANGES ITS CHAPTER 2.0, SAFETY LIMITS (SLs)
Sequoyah Unit 1 and Unit 2 Page 2 of 2 under the requirements provided in ITS 5.6.3, "Core Operating Limits Report."  ITS 5.6.3 ensures that the applicable limits of the safety analysis are met (e.g.,
fuel thermal mechanical limits, core thermal hydraulic limits, Emergency Core Cooling Systems limits, and nuclear limits such as SDM, transient analysis limits, and accident analysis limits). This change is designated as a less restrictive removal of detail change because information relating to cycle specific parameter limits is being removed from the Technical Specifications.
 
LESS RESTRICTIVE CHANGES None 
 
Improved Standard Technical Specifications (ISTS) Markup and Justification for Deviations (JFDs)
SLs 2.0    Westinghouse STS 2.0-1 Rev. 4.0  CTS 2SEQUOYAH UNIT 1 Amendment XXX
 
===2.0 SAFETY===
LIMITS (SLs)
 
2.1 SLs
 
====2.1.1 Reactor====
Core SLs
 
In MODES 1 and 2, the combination of THERMAL POWER, Reactor Coolant System (RCS) highest loop average temperature, and pressurizer pressure shall not exceed the limits specified in the COLR; and the following SLs shall not be
 
exceeded:
 
2.1.1.1 The departure from nucleate boiling ratio (DNBR) shall be maintained  [1.17 for the WRB
-1/WRB-2 DNB correlations].
2.1.1.2 The peak fuel centerline temperature shall be maintained
< [5080&deg;F, decreasing by 58&deg;F per 10,000 MWD/MTU of burnup]. 
 
====2.1.2 Reactor====
Coolant System Pressure SL
 
In MODES 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, the RCS pressure shall be maintained  [2735] psig. 2.2 SAFETY LIMIT VIOLATIONS
 
2.2.1 If SL 2.1.1 is violated, restore compliance and be in MODE 3 within 1 hour.
 
2.2.2 If SL 2.1.2 is violated:
2.2.2.1 In MODE 1 or 2, restore compliance and be in MODE 3 within 1 hour.
 
2.2.2.2 In MODE 3, 4, or 5, restore compliance within 5 minutes.
 
2.1.1, 2.1.1 Applicabilit y 2.1 2.1.2, 2.1.2 Applicabilit y 2.1.1 ACTION 2.1.2 ACTION  2.1.2 ACTION  2.1.2 ACTION  1 1 1maximum local fuel pin 22.1.1.1 2.1.1.2 INSERT 2 INSERT 1
 
====2.1.1 Insert====
Page 2.0-1 CTS INSERT 1  1.132 for the BHTP correlation,  1.21 for the BWU-N correlation, and  1.21 for the BWCMV correlation.
 
INSERT 2 
 
4901&deg;F, decreasing by 13.7&deg;F per 10,000 MWD/MTU of burnup for COPERNIC applications, and  4642&deg;F, decreasing by 58&deg;F per 10,000 MWD/MTU of burnup for TACO3 applications 1 1 SLs 2.0    Westinghouse STS 2.0-1 Rev. 4.0  CTS 2SEQUOYAH UNIT 2 Amendment XXX
 
===2.0 SAFETY===
LIMITS (SLs)
 
2.1 SLs
 
====2.1.1 Reactor====
Core SLs In MODES 1 and 2, the combination of THERMAL POWER, Reactor Coolant System (RCS) highest loop average temperature, and pressurizer pressure shall not exceed the limits specified in the COLR; and the following SLs shall not be


exceeded:
Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page                I of 38 ITS                                                (D                                      ITS Chapter 2.0 Figure 2.1 1 Reaeter Cere Safety timit Feur teeps in Operatien 680 UNACCEPTAB LE 660                                                      OPERATIOT\
2.1.1.1 The departure from nucleate boiling ratio (DNBR) shall be maintained [1.17 for the WRB
            \
-1/WRB-2 DNB correlations].
                      \            24OO psia
2.1.1.2 The peak fuel centerline temperature shall be maintained
            \                      \
< [5080&deg;F, decreasing by 58&deg;F per 10,000 MWD/MTU of burnup]. 
640            \            2250 psia  \
                                  \
            \
6n            \          - 1985 psia                \
IL g-'
o
                                  \            \.\\
F      \                                                  \
I                  \            1775 psra
                                                          \
U' (J
E  600                                                  \\            \
                                                \
580            ACCEPTABLE OPERATION
                                                                      \
560
                                                                                    \
540 FRACTION OF RATED THERMAL POWER September 26,2012 SEQUOYAH - UNIT 2                           2-2                            Amendment No. 21 ,324 Page 5 of 6 Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page                  I of 38


====2.1.2 Reactor====
Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 10 of 38 A01 ITS                                                                    ITS Chapter 2.0 This page deleted.
Coolant System Pressure SL
September 3, 1985 SEQUOYAH - UNIT 2                  2-3                      Amendment No. 33 Page 6 of 6 Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 10 of 38


In MODES 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, the RCS pressure shall be maintained  [2735] psig. 2.2 SAFETY LIMIT VIOLATIONS
Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 11 of 38 DISCUSSION OF CHANGES ITS CHAPTER 2.0, SAFETY LIMITS (SLs)
ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES A01  In the conversion of the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant (SQN) Current Technical Specifications (CTS) to the plant specific Improved Technical Specifications (ITS), certain changes (wording preferences, editorial changes, reformatting, revised numbering, etc.) are made to obtain consistency with NUREG-1431, Rev. 4.0, "Standard Technical Specifications - Westinghouse Plants" (ISTS) and additional Technical Specification Task Force (TSTF) travelers included in this submittal.
These changes are designated as administrative changes and are acceptable because they do not result in technical changes to the CTS.
MORE RESTRICTIVE CHANGES None RELOCATED SPECIFICATIONS None REMOVED DETAIL CHANGES LA01 (Type 6 - Removal of Cycle - Specific Limits from the Technical Specifications to the Core Operating Limits Report) CTS 2.1.1 requires the combination of THERMAL POWER, pressurizer pressure, and the highest operating loop coolant temperature (Tavg) not to exceed the limits shown in Figure 2.1-1. ITS 2.1.1 states the combination of THERMAL POWER, Reactor Coolant System (RCS) highest loop average temperature, and pressurizer pressure shall not exceed the limits specified in the COLR. This changes the CTS by moving limits that must be confirmed on a cycle specific bases to the COLR. The Reactor Core safety limits are retained in Technical Specification Chapter 2.0.
The removal of these cycle specific parameter limits from the Technical Specifications to the COLR and the retention of the limiting Safety Limits in the Technical Specifications is acceptable because the cycle specific limits are developed or utilized under NRC-approved methodologies that ensure the Safety Limits are met. The NRC documented in Generic Letter 88-16, "Removal of Cycle-Specific Parameter Limits From Technical Specifications," that this type of information is not necessary to be included in the Technical Specifications to provide adequate protection of public health and safety. The ITS still retains the Safety Limits. NRC-approved Topical Report WCAP-14483-A, "Generic Methodology for Expanded Core Operating Limits Report," determined that the specific values for these parameters may be relocated to the COLR provided the SLs continue to appear in the Technical Specifications. The methodologies used to develop the parameters in the COLR were approved by the NRC in accordance with Generic Letter 88-16. Additionally, this change is acceptable because the removed information will be adequately controlled in the COLR Sequoyah Unit 1 and Unit 2            Page 1 of 2 Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 11 of 38


2.2.1 If SL 2.1.1 is violated, restore compliance and be in MODE 3 within 1 hour.  
Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 12 of 38 DISCUSSION OF CHANGES ITS CHAPTER 2.0, SAFETY LIMITS (SLs) under the requirements provided in ITS 5.6.3, "Core Operating Limits Report."
ITS 5.6.3 ensures that the applicable limits of the safety analysis are met (e.g.,
fuel thermal mechanical limits, core thermal hydraulic limits, Emergency Core Cooling Systems limits, and nuclear limits such as SDM, transient analysis limits, and accident analysis limits). This change is designated as a less restrictive removal of detail change because information relating to cycle specific parameter limits is being removed from the Technical Specifications.
LESS RESTRICTIVE CHANGES None Sequoyah Unit 1 and Unit 2            Page 2 of 2 Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 12 of 38


2.2.2 If SL 2.1.2 is violated:
Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 13 of 38 Improved Standard Technical Specifications (ISTS) Markup and Justification for Deviations (JFDs)
2.2.2.1 In MODE 1 or 2, restore compliance and be in MODE 3 within 1 hour.
Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 13 of 38


2.2.2.2 In MODE 3, 4, or 5, restore compliance within 5 minutes.  
Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 14 of 38 CTS                                                                                                            SLs 2.0 2.0 SAFETY LIMITS (SLs) 2.1          2.1  SLs 2.1.1,            2.1.1    Reactor Core SLs 2.1.1 Applicability In MODES 1 and 2, the combination of THERMAL POWER, Reactor Coolant System (RCS) highest loop average temperature, and pressurizer pressure shall not exceed the limits specified in the COLR; and the following SLs shall not be exceeded:
2.1.1.1                    2.1.1.1      The departure from nucleate boiling ratio (DNBR) shall be maintained
[1.17 for the WRB-1/WRB-2 DNB correlations].              INSERT 1 1
maximum local fuel pin 2.1.1.2                    2.1.1.2      The peak fuel centerline temperature shall be maintained < [5080&deg;F,      2 1
decreasing by 58&deg;F per 10,000 MWD/MTU of burnup].
INSERT 2 2.1.2,            2.1.2    Reactor Coolant System Pressure SL 2.1.2 Applicability In MODES 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, the RCS pressure shall be maintained  [2735] psig.          1 2.2  SAFETY LIMIT VIOLATIONS 2.1.1              2.2.1    If SL 2.1.1 is violated, restore compliance and be in MODE 3 within 1 hour.
ACTION 2.1.2              2.2.2    If SL 2.1.2 is violated:
ACTION 2.1.2                      2.2.2.1      In MODE 1 or 2, restore compliance and be in MODE 3 within 1 hour.
ACTION 2.1.2                      2.2.2.2      In MODE 3, 4, or 5, restore compliance within 5 minutes.
ACTION SEQUOYAH UNIT 1                                                Amendment XXX Westinghouse STS                                2.0-1                                    Rev. 4.0    2 Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 14 of 38


2.1.1, 2.1.1 Applicabilit y 2.1 2.1.2, 2.1.2 Applicabilit y 2.1.1 ACTION 2.1.2 ACTION  2.1.2 ACTION 2.1.2 ACTION  1 1 1maximum local fuel pin 22.1.1.1 2.1.1.2 INSERT 2 INSERT 1
Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 15 of 38 CTS                                                                                          2.1.1 1
INSERT 1 1.132 for the BHTP correlation, 1.21 for the BWU-N correlation, and  1.21 for the BWCMV correlation.
1 INSERT 2 4901&deg;F, decreasing by 13.7&deg;F per 10,000 MWD/MTU of burnup for COPERNIC applications, and 4642&deg;F, decreasing by 58&deg;F per 10,000 MWD/MTU of burnup for TACO3 applications Insert Page 2.0-1 Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 15 of 38


====2.1.1 Insert====
CTS                                                                                                            SLs 2.0 2.0 SAFETY LIMITS (SLs) 2.1           2.1  SLs 2.1.1,            2.1.1   Reactor Core SLs 2.1.1 Applicability In MODES 1 and 2, the combination of THERMAL POWER, Reactor Coolant System (RCS) highest loop average temperature, and pressurizer pressure shall not exceed the limits specified in the COLR; and the following SLs shall not be exceeded:
Page 2.0-1 CTS INSERT 1   1.132 for the BHTP correlation, 1.21 for the BWU-N correlation, and  1.21 for the BWCMV correlation.  
2.1.1.1                    2.1.1.1      The departure from nucleate boiling ratio (DNBR) shall be maintained
[1.17 for the WRB-1/WRB-2 DNB correlations].              INSERT 1 1
maximum local fuel pin 2.1.1.2                    2.1.1.2      The peak fuel centerline temperature shall be maintained < [5080&deg;F,      2 1
decreasing by 58&deg;F per 10,000 MWD/MTU of burnup].
INSERT 2 2.1.2,            2.1.2    Reactor Coolant System Pressure SL 2.1.2 Applicability In MODES 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, the RCS pressure shall be maintained  [2735] psig.          1 2.2 SAFETY LIMIT VIOLATIONS 2.1.1              2.2.1    If SL 2.1.1 is violated, restore compliance and be in MODE 3 within 1 hour.
ACTION 2.1.2              2.2.2    If SL 2.1.2 is violated:
ACTION 2.1.2                      2.2.2.1      In MODE 1 or 2, restore compliance and be in MODE 3 within 1 hour.
ACTION 2.1.2                      2.2.2.2      In MODE 3, 4, or 5, restore compliance within 5 minutes.
ACTION SEQUOYAH UNIT 2                                                Amendment XXX Westinghouse STS                                2.0-1                                     Rev. 4.0    2


INSERT 2   
Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 17 of 38 CTS                                                                                          2.1.1 1
INSERT 1 1.132 for the BHTP correlation,  1.21 for the BWU-N correlation, and  1.21 for the BWCMV correlation.
1 INSERT 2 4901&deg;F, decreasing by 13.7&deg;F per 10,000 MWD/MTU of burnup for COPERNIC applications, and 4642&deg;F, decreasing by 58&deg;F per 10,000 MWD/MTU of burnup for TACO3 applications Insert Page 2.0-1 Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 17 of 38


4901&deg;F, decreasing by 13.7&deg;F per 10,000 MWD/MTU of burnup for COPERNIC applications, and  4642&deg;F, decreasing by 58&deg;F per 10,000 MWD/MTU of burnup for TACO3 applications 1 1 JUSTIFICATION FOR DEVIATIONS ITS CHAPTER 2.0, SAFETY LIMITS (SLs)
Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 18 of 38 JUSTIFICATION FOR DEVIATIONS ITS CHAPTER 2.0, SAFETY LIMITS (SLs)
Sequoyah Unit 1 and Unit 2 Page 1 of 1 1. The ISTS contains bracketed information and/or values that are generic to Westinghouse vintage plants. The brackets are removed and the proper plant specific information/value is inserted to reflect the current licensing basis.
: 1. The ISTS contains bracketed information and/or values that are generic to Westinghouse vintage plants. The brackets are removed and the proper plant specific information/value is inserted to reflect the current licensing basis.
: 2. Changes are made (additions, deletions, and/or changes) to the ISTS that reflect the plant specific nomenclature, number, reference, system description, analysis, or licensing basis description.
: 2. Changes are made (additions, deletions, and/or changes) to the ISTS that reflect the plant specific nomenclature, number, reference, system description, analysis, or licensing basis description.
Improved Standard Technical Specifications (ISTS) Bases Markup and Bases Justification for Deviations (JFDs)
Sequoyah Unit 1 and Unit 2             Page 1 of 1 Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 18 of 38
Reactor Core SLs B 2.1.1   Westinghouse STS B 2.1.1-1 Rev. 4.0 1Revision XXX SEQUOYAH UNIT 1 B 2.0  SAFETY LIMITS (SLs)
 
B 2.1.1  Reactor Core 
 
BASES BACKGROUND GDC 10 (Ref. 1) requires that specified acceptable fuel design limits are not exceeded during steady state operation, normal operational transients, and anticipated operational occurrences (AOOs). This is accomplished by having a departure from nucleate boiling (DNB) design basis, which corresponds to a 95% probability at a 95% confidence level (the 95/95 DNB criterion) that DNB will not occur and by requiring that


fuel centerline temperature stays below the melting temperature.
Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 19 of 38 Improved Standard Technical Specifications (ISTS) Bases Markup and Bases Justification for Deviations (JFDs)
The restrictions of this SL prevent overheating of the fuel and cladding, as well as possible cladding perforation, which would result in the release of fission products to the reactor coolant. Overheating of the fuel is prevented by maintaining the steady state peak linear heat rate (LHR) below the level at which fuel centerline melting occurs. Overheating of the fuel cladding is prevented by restricting fuel operation to within the nucleate boiling regime, where the heat transfer coefficient is large and the cladding surface temperature is slightly above the coolant saturation
Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 19 of 38


temperature.
Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 20 of 38 Reactor Core SLs B 2.1.1 B 2.0 SAFETY LIMITS (SLs)
Fuel centerline melting occurs when the local LHR, or power peaking, in a region of the fuel is high enough to cause the fuel centerline temperature to reach the melting point of the fuel. Expansion of the pellet upon centerline melting may cause the pellet to stress the cladding to the point of failure, allowing an uncontrolled release of activity to the reactor coolant. Operation above the boundary of the nucleate boiling regime could result in excessive cladding temperature because of the onset of DNB and the resultant sharp reduction in heat transfer coefficient. Inside the steam film, high cladding temperatures are reached, and a cladding water (zirconium water) reaction may take place. This chemical reaction results in oxidation of the fuel cladding to a structurally weaker form. This weaker form may lose its integrity, resulting in an uncontrolled release of activity to the reactor coolant.
B 2.1.1 Reactor Core BASES BACKGROUND              GDC 10 (Ref. 1) requires that specified acceptable fuel design limits are not exceeded during steady state operation, normal operational transients, and anticipated operational occurrences (AOOs). This is accomplished by having a departure from nucleate boiling (DNB) design basis, which corresponds to a 95% probability at a 95% confidence level (the 95/95 DNB criterion) that DNB will not occur and by requiring that fuel centerline temperature stays below the melting temperature.
The proper functioning of the Reactor Protection System (RPS) and steam generator safety valves prevents violation of the reactor core SLs. INSERT 1 INSERT 2 INSERT 3 1 1 1corresponding significant B 2.0 Insert Pages B 2.1.1-1a INSERT 1   (due to departure from nucleate boiling) and overheating of the fuel pellet (centerline fuel melt(CFM)), either of which could result in
INSERT 1 The restrictions of this SL prevent overheating of the fuel and cladding, as          1 well as possible cladding perforation, which would result in the release of fission products to the reactor coolant. Overheating of the fuel is prevented by maintaining the steady state peak linear heat rate (LHR) below the level at which fuel centerline melting occurs. Overheating of the fuel cladding is prevented by restricting fuel operation to within the nucleate boiling regime, where the heat transfer coefficient is large and the cladding surface temperature is slightly above the coolant saturation temperature.
 
Fuel centerline melting occurs when the local LHR, or power peaking, in a region of the fuel is high enough to cause the fuel centerline temperature to reach the melting point of the fuel. Expansion of the pellet upon centerline melting may cause the pellet to stress the cladding to the point of failure, allowing an uncontrolled release of activity to the reactor coolant.
INSERT 2  from the outer surface of the cladding to the reactor coolant water
corresponding significant Operation above the boundary of the nucleate boiling regime could result in excessive cladding temperature because of the onset of DNB and the resultant sharp reduction in heat transfer coefficient. Inside the steam             1 INSERT 2 film, high cladding temperatures are reached, and a cladding water (zirconium water) reaction may take place. This chemical reaction results in oxidation of the fuel cladding to a structurally weaker form. This weaker form may lose its integrity, resulting in an uncontrolled release of activity to the reactor coolant.                                           INSERT 3    1 The proper functioning of the Reactor Protection System (RPS) and steam generator safety valves prevents violation of the reactor core SLs.
 
SEQUOYAH UNIT 1                                                   Revision XXX Westinghouse STS                                B 2.1.1-1                                       Rev. 4.0      1 Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 20 of 38
INSERT 3 
 
DNB is not a directly measurable parameter during operation and therefore THERMAL POWER and Reactor Coolant Temperature and Pressure have been related to DNB. The DNB correlations have been developed to predict the DNB flux and the location of DNB for axially uniform and non-uniform heat flux distributions. The local DNB heat flux ratio, DNBR, defined as the ratio of the heat flux that would cause DNB at a particular core location to the local heat flux, is indicative of the margin to DNB.


Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 21 of 38 B 2.0 1
INSERT 1 (due to departure from nucleate boiling) and overheating of the fuel pellet (centerline fuel melt(CFM)), either of which could result in 1
INSERT 2 from the outer surface of the cladding to the reactor coolant water 1
INSERT 3 DNB is not a directly measurable parameter during operation and therefore THERMAL POWER and Reactor Coolant Temperature and Pressure have been related to DNB. The DNB correlations have been developed to predict the DNB flux and the location of DNB for axially uniform and non-uniform heat flux distributions. The local DNB heat flux ratio, DNBR, defined as the ratio of the heat flux that would cause DNB at a particular core location to the local heat flux, is indicative of the margin to DNB.
To meet the DNB Design Basis, a statistical core design (SCD) process has been used to develop an appropriate statistical DNBR design limit. Uncertainties in plant operating parameters, nuclear and thermal parameters, and fuel fabrication parameters are considered statistically such that there is at least a 95 percent probability at a 95 percent confidence level that the minimum DNBR for the limiting rod is greater than or equal to the DNBR limit. This DNBR uncertainty derived from the SCD analysis, combined with the applicable DNB critical heat flux correlation limit, establishes the statistical DNBR design limit which must be met in plant safety analysis using values of input parameters without adjustment for uncertainty.
To meet the DNB Design Basis, a statistical core design (SCD) process has been used to develop an appropriate statistical DNBR design limit. Uncertainties in plant operating parameters, nuclear and thermal parameters, and fuel fabrication parameters are considered statistically such that there is at least a 95 percent probability at a 95 percent confidence level that the minimum DNBR for the limiting rod is greater than or equal to the DNBR limit. This DNBR uncertainty derived from the SCD analysis, combined with the applicable DNB critical heat flux correlation limit, establishes the statistical DNBR design limit which must be met in plant safety analysis using values of input parameters without adjustment for uncertainty.
Operation above the maximum local linear heat generation rate for fuel melting could result in excessive fuel pellet temperature and cause melting of the fuel at its centerline. Fuel centerline melting occurs when the local LHR, or power peaking, in a region of the fuel is high enough to cause the fuel centerline temperature to reach the melting point of the fuel. Expansion of the pellet upon centerline melting may cause the pellet to stress the cladding to the point of failure, allowing an uncontrolled release of activity to the reactor coolant. The melting point of uranium dioxide varies slightly with burnup. As uranium is depleted and fission products produced, the net effect is a decrease in the melting point. Fuel centerline temperature is not a directly measurable parameter during operation. The maximum local fuel pin centerline temperature is maintained by limiting the local linear heat generation rate in the fuel. The local linear heat generation rate in the fuel is limited so that the maximum fuel centerline temperature will not exceed the value acceptance criteria in the safety analysis.
Operation above the maximum local linear heat generation rate for fuel melting could result in excessive fuel pellet temperature and cause melting of the fuel at its centerline. Fuel centerline melting occurs when the local LHR, or power peaking, in a region of the fuel is high enough to cause the fuel centerline temperature to reach the melting point of the fuel. Expansion of the pellet upon centerline melting may cause the pellet to stress the cladding to the point of failure, allowing an uncontrolled release of activity to the reactor coolant. The melting point of uranium dioxide varies slightly with burnup. As uranium is depleted and fission products produced, the net effect is a decrease in the melting point. Fuel centerline temperature is not a directly measurable parameter during operation. The maximum local fuel pin centerline temperature is maintained by limiting the local linear heat generation rate in the fuel. The local linear heat generation rate in the fuel is limited so that the maximum fuel centerline temperature will not exceed the value acceptance criteria in the safety analysis.
1 1 1 B 2.0 Insert Pages B 2.1.1-1b INSERT 3 (cont)
Insert Pages B 2.1.1-1a Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 21 of 38
The curves provided in the COLR show the loci of points of THERMAL POWER, Reactor Coolant System pressure and average temperature for which the minimum DNBR is no less than the safety analysis DNBR limit, or the average enthalpy at the vessel exit is equal to the enthalpy of saturated liquid.


These lines are bounding for all fuel types. The curves provided in the COLR are based upon enthalpy rise hot channel factors that result in acceptable DNBR performance of each fuel type. Acceptable DNBR performance is assured by operation within the DNB-based Limiting Safety  
Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 22 of 38 B 2.0 1
INSERT 3 (cont)
The curves provided in the COLR show the loci of points of THERMAL POWER, Reactor Coolant System pressure and average temperature for which the minimum DNBR is no less than the safety analysis DNBR limit, or the average enthalpy at the vessel exit is equal to the enthalpy of saturated liquid.
These lines are bounding for all fuel types. The curves provided in the COLR are based upon enthalpy rise hot channel factors that result in acceptable DNBR performance of each fuel type.
Acceptable DNBR performance is assured by operation within the DNB-based Limiting Safety Limit System Settings (Reactor Trip System trip limits). The plant trip set points are verified to be less than the limits defined by the safety limit lines provided in the COLR converted from power to delta-temperature and adjusted for uncertainty.
The limiting heat flux conditions for DNB are higher than those calculated for the range of all control rods fully withdrawn to the maximum allowable control rod insertion assuming the axial power imbalance or Delta-I (I) is within the limits of the f1 (Delta I) function of the Overtemperature Delta Temperature trip. When the axial power imbalance exceeds the tolerance (or deadband) of the f1(l) trip reset function, the Overtemperature Delta Temperature trip set point is reduced by the values in the COLR to provide protection required by the core safety limits.
Similarly, the limiting linear heat generation rate conditions for CFM are higher than those calculated for the range of all control rods from fully withdrawn to the maximum allowable control rod insertion assuming the axial power imbalance or Delta-I (I) is within the limits of the f2(I) function of the Overpower-Delta Temperature trip. When the axial power imbalance exceeds the tolerance (or deadband) of the f2(I) trip reset function, the Overpower-Delta Temperature trip set point is reduced by the values specified in the COLR to provide protection required by the core safety limits.
Insert Pages B 2.1.1-1b Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 22 of 38


Limit System Settings (Reactor Trip System trip limits). The plant trip set points are verified to be less than the limits defined by the safety limit lines provided in the COLR converted from power to delta-temperature and adjusted for uncertainty.
Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 23 of 38 Reactor Core SLs B 2.1.1 BASES APPLICABLE         The fuel cladding must not sustain damage as a result of normal SAFETY             operation and AOOs. The reactor core SLs are established to preclude ANALYSES           violation of the following fuel design criteria:
The limiting heat flux conditions for DNB are higher than those calculated for the range of all control rods fully withdrawn to the maximum allowable control rod insertion assuming the axial power imbalance or Delta-I (I) is within the limits of the f 1 (Delta I) function of the Overtemperature Delta Temperature trip. When the axial power imbalance exceeds the tolerance (or deadband) of the f 1 (l) trip reset function, the Overtemperature Delta Temperature trip set point is reduced by the values in the COLR to provide protection required by the core safety limits.  
 
Similarly, the limiting linear heat generation rate conditions for CFM are higher than those calculated for the range of all control rods from fully withdrawn to the maximum allowable control rod insertion assuming the axial power imbalance or Delta-I (I) is within the limits of the f 2 (I) function of the Overpower-Delta Temperature trip. When the axial power imbalance exceeds the tolerance (or deadband) of the f 2 (I) trip reset function, the Overpower-Delta Temperature trip set point is reduced by the values specified in the COLR to provide protection required by the core safety limits.
 
1 Reactor Core SLs B 2.1.1    Westinghouse STS B 2.1.1-2 Rev. 4.0  1Revision XXX SEQUOYAH UNIT 1 BASES  
 
APPLICABLE The fuel cladding must not sustain damage as a result of normal SAFETY   operation and AOOs. The reactor core SLs are established to preclude ANALYSES violation of the following fuel design criteria:
: a. There must be at least 95% probability at a 95% confidence level (the 95/95 DNB criterion) that the hot fuel rod in the core does not experience DNB and
: a. There must be at least 95% probability at a 95% confidence level (the 95/95 DNB criterion) that the hot fuel rod in the core does not experience DNB and
: b. The hot fuel pellet in the core must not experience centerline fuel melting. The Reactor Trip System setpoints (Ref. 2), in combination with all the LCOs, are designed to prevent any anticipated combination of transient conditions for Reactor Coolant System (RCS) temperature, pressure, RCS Flow, I, and THERMAL POWER level that would result in a departure from nucleate boiling ratio (DNBR) of less than the DNBR limit and preclude the existence of flow instabilities.  
: b. The hot fuel pellet in the core must not experience centerline fuel melting.
 
1 The Reactor Trip System setpoints (Ref. 2), in combination with all the LCOs, are designed to prevent any anticipated combination of transient conditions for Reactor Coolant System (RCS) temperature, pressure, RCS Flow, I, and THERMAL POWER level that would result in a departure from nucleate boiling ratio (DNBR) of less than the DNBR limit and preclude the existence of flow instabilities.
Automatic enforcement of these reactor core SLs is provided by the appropriate operation of the RPS and the steam generator safety valves.  
Automatic enforcement of these reactor core SLs is provided by the appropriate operation of the RPS and the steam generator safety valves.
 
The SLs represent a design requirement for establishing the RPS trip setpoints identified previously. LCO 3.4.1, "RCS Pressure, Temperature, and Flow Departure from Nucleate Boiling (DNB) Limits," or the assumed           U initial conditions of the safety analyses (as indicated in the FSAR, Ref. 2)       1 provide more restrictive limits to ensure that the SLs are not exceeded.
The SLs represent a design requirement for establishing the RPS trip setpoints identified previously. LCO 3.4.1, "RCS Pressure, Temperature, and Flow Departure from Nucleate Boiling (DNB) Limits," or the assumed initial conditions of the safety analyses (as indicated in the FSAR, Ref. 2) provide more restrictive limits to ensure that the SLs are not exceeded.  
SAFETY LIMITS       The figure provided in the COLR shows the loci of points of THERMAL POWER, RCS pressure, and average temperature for which the minimum DNBR is not less than the safety analyses limit, that fuel centerline temperature remains below melting, that the average enthalpy in the hot leg is less than or equal to the enthalpy of saturated liquid, or that the exit quality is within the limits defined by the DNBR correlation.
 
SAFETY LIMITS The figure provided in the COLR shows the loci of points of THERMAL POWER, RCS pressure, and average temperature for which the minimum DNBR is not less than the safety analyses limit, that fuel centerline temperature remains below melting, that the average enthalpy in the hot leg is less than or equal to the enthalpy of saturated liquid, or that the exit quality is within the limits defined by the DNBR correlation.
The reactor core SLs are established to preclude violation of the following fuel design criteria:
The reactor core SLs are established to preclude violation of the following fuel design criteria:
: a. There must be at least a 95% probability at a 95% confidence level (the 95/95 DNB criterion) that the hot fuel rod in the core does not experience DNB and
: a. There must be at least a 95% probability at a 95% confidence level (the 95/95 DNB criterion) that the hot fuel rod in the core does not experience DNB and
: b. There must be at least a 95% probability at a 95% confidence level that the hot fuel pellet in the core does not experience centerline fuel melting. U 1 1 Reactor Core SLs B 2.1.1    Westinghouse STS B 2.1.1-3 Rev. 4.0 1SEQUOYAH UNIT 1 Revision XXX BASES
: b. There must be at least a 95% probability at a 95% confidence level that the hot fuel pellet in the core does not experience centerline fuel melting.
 
SEQUOYAH UNIT 1                                               Revision XXX Westinghouse STS                             B 2.1.1-2                                      Rev. 4.0   1 Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 23 of 38
SAFETY LIMITS  (continued)


Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 24 of 38 Reactor Core SLs B 2.1.1 BASES SAFETY LIMITS (continued)
The reactor core SLs are used to define the various RPS functions such that the above criteria are satisfied during steady state operation, normal operational transients, and anticipated operational occurrences (AOOs).
The reactor core SLs are used to define the various RPS functions such that the above criteria are satisfied during steady state operation, normal operational transients, and anticipated operational occurrences (AOOs).
To ensure that the RPS precludes the violation of the above criteria, additional criteria are applied to the Overtemperature and Overpower T reactor trip functions. That is, it must be demonstrated that the average enthalpy in the hot leg is less than or equal to the saturation enthalpy and that the core exit quality is within the limits defined by the DNBR correlation. Appropriate functioning of the RPS ensures that for variations in the THERMAL POWER, RCS Pressure, RCS average temperature, RCS flow rate, and I that the reactor core SLs will be satisfied during steady state operation, normal operational transients, and AOOs.  
To ensure that the RPS precludes the violation of the above criteria, additional criteria are applied to the Overtemperature and Overpower T reactor trip functions. That is, it must be demonstrated that the average enthalpy in the hot leg is less than or equal to the saturation enthalpy and that the core exit quality is within the limits defined by the DNBR correlation. Appropriate functioning of the RPS ensures that for variations in the THERMAL POWER, RCS Pressure, RCS average temperature, RCS flow rate, and I that the reactor core SLs will be satisfied during steady state operation, normal operational transients, and AOOs.
 
APPLICABILITY       SL 2.1.1 only applies in MODES 1 and 2 because these are the only MODES in which the reactor is critical. Automatic protection functions are required to be OPERABLE during MODES 1 and 2 to ensure operation within the reactor core SLs. The steam generator safety valves or automatic protection actions serve to prevent RCS heatup to the reactor core SL conditions or to initiate a reactor trip function, which forces the unit into MODE 3. Setpoints for the reactor trip functions are specified in LCO 3.3.1, "Reactor Trip System (RTS) Instrumentation." In MODES 3, 4, 5, and 6, Applicability is not required since the reactor is not generating significant THERMAL POWER.
APPLICABILITY SL 2.1.1 only applies in MODES 1 and 2 because these are the only MODES in which the reactor is critical. Automatic protection functions are required to be OPERABLE during MODES 1 and 2 to ensure operation within the reactor core SLs. The steam generator safety valves or automatic protection actions serve to prevent RCS heatup to the reactor core SL conditions or to initiate a reactor trip function, which forces the unit into MODE 3. Setpoints for the reactor trip functions are specified in LCO 3.3.1, "Reactor Trip System (RTS) Instrumentation." In MODES 3, 4, 5, and 6, Applicability is not required since the reactor is not generating significant THERMAL POWER.
SAFETY LIMIT         The following SL violation responses are applicable to the reactor core VIOLATIONS           SLs. If SL 2.1.1 is violated, the requirement to go to MODE 3 places the unit in a MODE in which this SL is not applicable.
SAFETY LIMIT The following SL violation responses are applicable to the reactor core VIOLATIONS SLs. If SL 2.1.1 is violated, the requirement to go to MODE 3 places the unit in a MODE in which this SL is not applicable.
The allowed Completion Time of 1 hour recognizes the importance of bringing the unit to a MODE of operation where this SL is not applicable, and reduces the probability of fuel damage.
The allowed Completion Time of 1 hour recognizes the importance of bringing the unit to a MODE of operation where this SL is not applicable, and reduces the probability of fuel damage.  
REFERENCES           1. 10 CFR 50, Appendix A, GDC 10.
 
U
REFERENCES 1. 10 CFR 50, Appendix A, GDC 10.
: 2. FSAR, Section [7.2].                                                       1   2 SEQUOYAH UNIT 1                                                   Revision XXX Westinghouse STS                             B 2.1.1-3                                        Rev. 4.0   1 Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 24 of 38
: 2. FSAR, Section
[7.2]. U 1 2 RCS Pressure SL B 2.1.2    Westinghouse STS B 2.1.2-1 Rev. 4.0 1SEQUOYAH UNIT 1 Revision XXX B 2.0  SAFETY LIMITS (SLs)
 
B 2.1.2 Reactor Coolant System (RCS) Pressure SL 
 
BASES BACKGROUND The SL on RCS pressure protects the integrity of the RCS against overpressurization. In the event of fuel cladding failure, fission products are released into the reactor coolant. The RCS then serves as the primary barrier in preventing the release of fission products into the atmosphere. By establishing an upper limit on RCS pressure, the continued integrity of the RCS is ensured. According to 10 CFR 50, Appendix A, GDC 14, "Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary," and GDC 15, "Reactor Coolant System Design" (Ref. 1), the reactor pressure coolant boundary (RCPB) design conditions are not to be exceeded during normal operation and anticipated operational occurrences (AOOs). Also, in accordance with GDC 28, "Reac tivity Limits" (Ref. 1), reactivity accidents, including rod ejection, do not result in damage to the RCPB
 
greater than limited local yielding.
The design pressure of the RCS is 2500 psia. During normal operation and AOOs, RCS pressure is limited from exceeding the design pressure by more than 10%, in accordance with Section III of the ASME Code (Ref. 2). To ensure system integrity, all RCS components are hydrostatically tested at 125% of design pressure, according to the ASME Code requirements prior to initial operation when there is no fuel in the core. Following inception of unit operation, RCS components shall be pressure tested, in accordance with the requirements of ASME Code, Section XI (Ref. 3).


Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 25 of 38 RCS Pressure SL B 2.1.2 B 2.0 SAFETY LIMITS (SLs)
B 2.1.2 Reactor Coolant System (RCS) Pressure SL BASES BACKGROUND          The SL on RCS pressure protects the integrity of the RCS against overpressurization. In the event of fuel cladding failure, fission products are released into the reactor coolant. The RCS then serves as the primary barrier in preventing the release of fission products into the atmosphere. By establishing an upper limit on RCS pressure, the continued integrity of the RCS is ensured. According to 10 CFR 50, Appendix A, GDC 14, "Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary," and coolant GDC 15, "Reactor Coolant System Design" (Ref. 1), the reactor pressure coolant boundary (RCPB) design conditions are not to be exceeded                  3 during normal operation and anticipated operational occurrences (AOOs).
Also, in accordance with GDC 28, "Reactivity Limits" (Ref. 1), reactivity accidents, including rod ejection, do not result in damage to the RCPB greater than limited local yielding.
2485 psig 1
The design pressure of the RCS is 2500 psia. During normal operation and AOOs, RCS pressure is limited from exceeding the design pressure by more than 10%, in accordance with Section III of the ASME Code (Ref. 2). To ensure system integrity, all RCS components are hydrostatically tested at 125% of design pressure, according to the ASME Code requirements prior to initial operation when there is no fuel in the core. Following inception of unit operation, RCS components shall be pressure tested, in accordance with the requirements of ASME Code, Section XI (Ref. 3).
Overpressurization of the RCS could result in a breach of the RCPB. If such a breach occurs in conjunction with a fuel cladding failure, fission products could enter the containment atmosphere, raising concerns relative to limits on radioactive releases specified in 10 CFR 100, "Reactor Site Criteria" (Ref. 4).
Overpressurization of the RCS could result in a breach of the RCPB. If such a breach occurs in conjunction with a fuel cladding failure, fission products could enter the containment atmosphere, raising concerns relative to limits on radioactive releases specified in 10 CFR 100, "Reactor Site Criteria" (Ref. 4).
APPLICABLE The RCS pressurizer safety valves, the main steam safety valves SAFETY (MSSVs), and the reactor high pressure trip have settings established ANALYSES to ensure that the RCS pressure SL will not be exceeded.   
APPLICABLE           The RCS pressurizer safety valves, the main steam safety valves SAFETY               (MSSVs), and the reactor high pressure trip have settings established ANALYSES             to ensure that the RCS pressure SL will not be exceeded.
The RCS pressurizer safety valves are sized to prevent system pressure from exceeding the design pressure by more than 10%, as specified in Section III of the ASME Code for Nuclear Power Plant Components (Ref. 2). The transient that establishes the required relief capacity, and hence valve size requirements and lift settings, is a complete loss of SEQUOYAH UNIT 1                                                Revision XXX Westinghouse STS                            B 2.1.2-1                                      Rev. 4.0 1 Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 25 of 38


The RCS pressurizer safety valves are sized to prevent system pressure from exceeding the design pressure by more than 10%, as specified in Section III of the ASME Code for Nuclear Power Plant Components (Ref. 2). The transient that establishes the required relief capacity, and hence valve size requirements and lift settings, is a complete loss of coolant2485 psig 3 1 RCS Pressure SL B 2.1.2   Westinghouse STS B 2.1.2-2 Rev. 4.0  1SEQUOYAH UNIT 1 Revision XXX BASES  
Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 26 of 38 RCS Pressure SL B 2.1.2 BASES APPLICABLE SAFETY ANALYSES (continued) external load without a direct reactor trip. During the transient, no control actions are assumed, except that the safety valves on the secondary plant are assumed to open when the steam pressure reaches the secondary plant safety valve settings, and nominal feedwater supply is maintained.
 
APPLICABLE SAFETY ANALYSES (continued)  
 
external load without a direct reactor trip. During the transient, no control actions are assumed, except that the safety valves on the secondary plant are assumed to open when the steam pressure reaches the  
 
secondary plant safety valve settings, and nominal feedwater supply is  
 
maintained.
The Reactor Trip System setpoints (Ref. 5), together with the settings of the MSSVs, provide pressure protection for normal operation and AOOs.
The Reactor Trip System setpoints (Ref. 5), together with the settings of the MSSVs, provide pressure protection for normal operation and AOOs.
The reactor high pressure trip setpoint is specifically set to provide protection against overpressurization (Ref. 5). The safety analyses for both the high pressure trip and the RCS pressurizer safety valves are performed using conservative assumptions relative to pressure control devices. More specifically, no credit is taken for operation of any of the following:
The reactor high pressure trip setpoint is specifically set to provide protection against overpressurization (Ref. 5). The safety analyses for both the high pressure trip and the RCS pressurizer safety valves are performed using conservative assumptions relative to pressure control devices.
: a. Pressurizer power operated relief valves (PORVs)
More specifically, no credit is taken for operation of any of the following:
,
: a. Pressurizer power operated relief valves (PORVs),
: b. Steam line relief valve,
                                                                              ;                  4
: c. Steam Dump System
: b. Steam line relief valve, b                                                                      4
d. Reactor Control System
: c. Steam Dump System, c                                                                          5
e. Pressurizer Level Control System
: d. Reactor Control System, 4
, or
d
: f. Pressurizer spray valve.
: e. Pressurizer Level Control System, or                                     4 e
SAFETY LIMITS The maximum transient pressure allowed in the RCS pressure vessel under the ASME Code, Section III, is 110% of design pressure. The maximum transient pressure allowed in the RCS piping, valves, and fittings under
: f. Pressurizer spray valve.                                                 4 SAFETY LIMITS       The maximum transient pressure allowed in the RCS pressure vessel under the ASME Code, Section III, is 110% of design pressure. The maximum transient pressure allowed in the RCS piping, valves, and fittings under [USAS, Section B31.1 (Ref. 6)] is 120% of design pressure.       2 The most limiting of these two allowances is the 110% of design pressure; therefore, the SL on maximum allowable RCS pressure is 2735 psig.
[USAS, Section B31.1 (Ref. 6)
SEQUOYAH UNIT 1                                             Revision XXX Westinghouse STS                           B 2.1.2-2                                    Rev. 4.0   1 Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 26 of 38
] is 120% of design pressure. The most limiting of these two allowances is the 110% of design pressure; therefore, the SL on maximum allowable RCS pressure is 2735 psig.
 
2 b c d e 4 4 4 4 4; ; 5 RCS Pressure SL B 2.1.2    Westinghouse STS B 2.1.2-3 Rev. 4.0 1SEQUOYAH UNIT 1 Revision XXX BASES
 
APPLICABILITY SL 2.1.2 applies in MODES 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 because this SL could be approached or exceeded in these MODES due to overpressurization events. The SL is not applicable in MODE 6 because the reactor vessel head closure bolts are not fully tightened, making it unlikely that the RCS can be pressurized. 


SAFETY LIMIT If the RCS pressure SL is violated when the reactor is in MODE 1 VIOLATIONS or 2, the requirement is to restore compliance and be in MODE 3 within 1 hour. Exceeding the RCS pressure SL may cause immediate RCS failure and create a potential for radioactive releases in excess of 10 CFR 100, "Reactor Site Criteria," limits (Ref. 4).
Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 27 of 38 RCS Pressure SL B 2.1.2 BASES APPLICABILITY      SL 2.1.2 applies in MODES 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 because this SL could be approached or exceeded in these MODES due to overpressurization events. The SL is not applicable in MODE 6 because the reactor vessel head closure bolts are not fully tightened, making it unlikely that the RCS can be pressurized.
SAFETY LIMIT       If the RCS pressure SL is violated when the reactor is in MODE 1 VIOLATIONS         or 2, the requirement is to restore compliance and be in MODE 3 within 1 hour.
Exceeding the RCS pressure SL may cause immediate RCS failure and create a potential for radioactive releases in excess of 10 CFR 100, "Reactor Site Criteria," limits (Ref. 4).
The allowable Completion Time of 1 hour recognizes the importance of reducing power level to a MODE of operation where the potential for challenges to safety systems is minimized.
The allowable Completion Time of 1 hour recognizes the importance of reducing power level to a MODE of operation where the potential for challenges to safety systems is minimized.
If the RCS pressure SL is exceeded in MODE 3, 4, or 5, RCS pressure must be restored to within the SL value within 5 minutes. Exceeding the RCS pressure SL in MODE 3, 4, or 5 is more severe than exceeding this SL in MODE 1 or 2, since the reactor vessel temperature may be lower and the vessel material, consequently, less ductile. As such, pressure must be reduced to less than the SL within 5 minutes. The action does not require reducing MODES, since this would require reducing temperature, which would compound the problem by adding thermal gradient stresses to the existing pressure stress.  
If the RCS pressure SL is exceeded in MODE 3, 4, or 5, RCS pressure must be restored to within the SL value within 5 minutes. Exceeding the RCS pressure SL in MODE 3, 4, or 5 is more severe than exceeding this SL in MODE 1 or 2, since the reactor vessel temperature may be lower and the vessel material, consequently, less ductile. As such, pressure must be reduced to less than the SL within 5 minutes. The action does not require reducing MODES, since this would require reducing temperature, which would compound the problem by adding thermal gradient stresses to the existing pressure stress.
 
REFERENCES         1. 10 CFR 50, Appendix A, GDC 14, GDC 15, and GDC 28.
REFERENCES 1. 10 CFR 50, Appendix A, GDC 14, GDC 15, and GDC 28.
: 2. ASME, Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section III, Article NB-7000.                                                           1
: 2. ASME, Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section III, Article NB-7000.
                                              , 1971
: 3. ASME, Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section XI, Article IWX-5000.
: 3. ASME, Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section XI, Article IWX-5000.
: 4. 10 CFR 100.
: 4. 10 CFR 100.
: 5. FSAR, Section
U
[7.2].
: 5. FSAR, Section [7.2].                                                     1 2
: 6. USAS B31.1, Standard Code for Pressure Piping, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1967.
: 6. USAS B31.1, Standard Code for Pressure Piping, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1967.
2, 1971 U 1 1 Reactor Core SLs B 2.1.1    Westinghouse STS B 2.1.1-1 Rev. 4.0 1Revision XXX SEQUOYAH UNIT 2 B 2.0  SAFETY LIMITS (SLs)
SEQUOYAH UNIT 1                                             Revision XXX Westinghouse STS                           B 2.1.2-3                                      Rev. 4.0   1 Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 27 of 38
 
B 2.1.1  Reactor Core 
 
BASES BACKGROUND GDC 10 (Ref. 1) requires that specified acceptable fuel design limits are not exceeded during steady state operation, normal operational transients, and anticipated operational occurrences (AOOs). This is accomplished by having a departure from nucleate boiling (DNB) design basis, which corresponds to a 95% probability at a 95% confidence level (the 95/95 DNB criterion) that DNB will not occur and by requiring that
 
fuel centerline temperature stays below the melting temperature.
The restrictions of this SL prevent overheating of the fuel and cladding, as well as possible cladding perforation, which would result in the release of fission products to the reactor coolant. Overheating of the fuel is prevented by maintaining the steady state peak linear heat rate (LHR) below the level at which fuel centerline melting occurs. Overheating of the fuel cladding is prevented by restricting fuel operation to within the nucleate boiling regime, where the heat transfer coefficient is large and the cladding surface temperature is slightly above the coolant saturation
 
temperature.
Fuel centerline melting occurs when the local LHR, or power peaking, in a region of the fuel is high enough to cause the fuel centerline temperature to reach the melting point of the fuel. Expansion of the pellet upon centerline melting may cause the pellet to stress the cladding to the point of failure, allowing an uncontrolled release of activity to the reactor coolant. Operation above the boundary of the nucleate boiling regime could result in excessive cladding temperature because of the onset of DNB and the resultant sharp reduction in heat transfer coefficient. Inside the steam film, high cladding temperatures are reached, and a cladding water (zirconium water) reaction may take place. This chemical reaction results in oxidation of the fuel cladding to a structurally weaker form. This weaker form may lose its integrity, resulting in an uncontrolled release of activity to the reactor coolant.
The proper functioning of the Reactor Protection System (RPS) and steam generator safety valves prevents violation of the reactor core SLs. INSERT 1 INSERT 2 INSERT 3 1 1 1corresponding significant B 2.0 Insert Pages B 2.1.1-1a INSERT 1  (due to departure from nucleate boiling) and overheating of the fuel pellet (centerline fuel melt(CFM)), either of which could result in


INSERT 2   from the outer surface of the cladding to the reactor coolant water
Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 28 of 38 Reactor Core SLs B 2.1.1 B 2.0 SAFETY LIMITS (SLs)
 
B 2.1.1 Reactor Core BASES BACKGROUND              GDC 10 (Ref. 1) requires that specified acceptable fuel design limits are not exceeded during steady state operation, normal operational transients, and anticipated operational occurrences (AOOs). This is accomplished by having a departure from nucleate boiling (DNB) design basis, which corresponds to a 95% probability at a 95% confidence level (the 95/95 DNB criterion) that DNB will not occur and by requiring that fuel centerline temperature stays below the melting temperature.
INSERT 3 
INSERT 1 The restrictions of this SL prevent overheating of the fuel and cladding, as          1 well as possible cladding perforation, which would result in the release of fission products to the reactor coolant. Overheating of the fuel is prevented by maintaining the steady state peak linear heat rate (LHR) below the level at which fuel centerline melting occurs. Overheating of the fuel cladding is prevented by restricting fuel operation to within the nucleate boiling regime, where the heat transfer coefficient is large and the cladding surface temperature is slightly above the coolant saturation temperature.
 
Fuel centerline melting occurs when the local LHR, or power peaking, in a region of the fuel is high enough to cause the fuel centerline temperature to reach the melting point of the fuel. Expansion of the pellet upon centerline melting may cause the pellet to stress the cladding to the point of failure, allowing an uncontrolled release of activity to the reactor coolant.
DNB is not a directly measurable parameter during operation and therefore THERMAL POWER and Reactor Coolant Temperature and Pressure have been related to DNB. The DNB correlations have been developed to predict the DNB flux and the location of DNB for axially uniform and non-uniform heat flux distributions. The local DNB heat flux ratio, DNBR, defined as the ratio of the heat flux that would cause DNB at a particular core location to the local heat flux, is indicative of the margin to DNB.  
corresponding significant Operation above the boundary of the nucleate boiling regime could result in excessive cladding temperature because of the onset of DNB and the resultant sharp reduction in heat transfer coefficient. Inside the steam              1 INSERT 2 film, high cladding temperatures are reached, and a cladding water (zirconium water) reaction may take place. This chemical reaction results in oxidation of the fuel cladding to a structurally weaker form. This weaker form may lose its integrity, resulting in an uncontrolled release of activity to the reactor coolant.                                          INSERT 3    1 The proper functioning of the Reactor Protection System (RPS) and steam generator safety valves prevents violation of the reactor core SLs.
SEQUOYAH UNIT 2                                                  Revision XXX Westinghouse STS                                B 2.1.1-1                                      Rev. 4.0      1 Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 28 of 38


Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 29 of 38 B 2.0 1
INSERT 1 (due to departure from nucleate boiling) and overheating of the fuel pellet (centerline fuel melt(CFM)), either of which could result in 1
INSERT 2 from the outer surface of the cladding to the reactor coolant water 1
INSERT 3 DNB is not a directly measurable parameter during operation and therefore THERMAL POWER and Reactor Coolant Temperature and Pressure have been related to DNB. The DNB correlations have been developed to predict the DNB flux and the location of DNB for axially uniform and non-uniform heat flux distributions. The local DNB heat flux ratio, DNBR, defined as the ratio of the heat flux that would cause DNB at a particular core location to the local heat flux, is indicative of the margin to DNB.
To meet the DNB Design Basis, a statistical core design (SCD) process has been used to develop an appropriate statistical DNBR design limit. Uncertainties in plant operating parameters, nuclear and thermal parameters, and fuel fabrication parameters are considered statistically such that there is at least a 95 percent probability at a 95 percent confidence level that the minimum DNBR for the limiting rod is greater than or equal to the DNBR limit. This DNBR uncertainty derived from the SCD analysis, combined with the applicable DNB critical heat flux correlation limit, establishes the statistical DNBR design limit which must be met in plant safety analysis using values of input parameters without adjustment for uncertainty.
To meet the DNB Design Basis, a statistical core design (SCD) process has been used to develop an appropriate statistical DNBR design limit. Uncertainties in plant operating parameters, nuclear and thermal parameters, and fuel fabrication parameters are considered statistically such that there is at least a 95 percent probability at a 95 percent confidence level that the minimum DNBR for the limiting rod is greater than or equal to the DNBR limit. This DNBR uncertainty derived from the SCD analysis, combined with the applicable DNB critical heat flux correlation limit, establishes the statistical DNBR design limit which must be met in plant safety analysis using values of input parameters without adjustment for uncertainty.
Operation above the maximum local linear heat generation rate for fuel melting could result in excessive fuel pellet temperature and cause melting of the fuel at its centerline. Fuel centerline melting occurs when the local LHR, or power peaking, in a region of the fuel is high enough to cause the fuel centerline temperature to reach the melting point of the fuel. Expansion of the pellet upon centerline melting may cause the pellet to stress the cladding to the point of failure, allowing an uncontrolled release of activity to the reactor coolant. The melting point of uranium dioxide varies slightly with burnup. As uranium is depleted and fission products produced, the net effect is a decrease in the melting point. Fuel centerline temperature is not a directly measurable parameter during operation. The maximum local fuel pin centerline temperature is maintained by limiting the local linear heat generation rate in the fuel. The local linear heat generation rate in the fuel is limited so that the maximum fuel centerline temperature will not exceed the value acceptance criteria in the safety analysis.
Operation above the maximum local linear heat generation rate for fuel melting could result in excessive fuel pellet temperature and cause melting of the fuel at its centerline. Fuel centerline melting occurs when the local LHR, or power peaking, in a region of the fuel is high enough to cause the fuel centerline temperature to reach the melting point of the fuel. Expansion of the pellet upon centerline melting may cause the pellet to stress the cladding to the point of failure, allowing an uncontrolled release of activity to the reactor coolant. The melting point of uranium dioxide varies slightly with burnup. As uranium is depleted and fission products produced, the net effect is a decrease in the melting point. Fuel centerline temperature is not a directly measurable parameter during operation. The maximum local fuel pin centerline temperature is maintained by limiting the local linear heat generation rate in the fuel. The local linear heat generation rate in the fuel is limited so that the maximum fuel centerline temperature will not exceed the value acceptance criteria in the safety analysis.
1 1 1 B 2.0 Insert Pages B 2.1.1-1b INSERT 3 (cont)
Insert Pages B 2.1.1-1a Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 29 of 38
The curves provided in the COLR show the loci of points of THERMAL POWER, Reactor Coolant System pressure and average temperature for which the minimum DNBR is no less than the safety analysis DNBR limit, or the average enthalpy at the vessel exit is equal to the enthalpy of saturated liquid.


These lines are bounding for all fuel types. The curves provided in the COLR are based upon enthalpy rise hot channel factors that result in acceptable DNBR performance of each fuel type. Acceptable DNBR performance is assured by operation within the DNB-based Limiting Safety  
Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 30 of 38 B 2.0 1
INSERT 3 (cont)
The curves provided in the COLR show the loci of points of THERMAL POWER, Reactor Coolant System pressure and average temperature for which the minimum DNBR is no less than the safety analysis DNBR limit, or the average enthalpy at the vessel exit is equal to the enthalpy of saturated liquid.
These lines are bounding for all fuel types. The curves provided in the COLR are based upon enthalpy rise hot channel factors that result in acceptable DNBR performance of each fuel type.
Acceptable DNBR performance is assured by operation within the DNB-based Limiting Safety Limit System Settings (Reactor Trip System trip limits). The plant trip set points are verified to be less than the limits defined by the safety limit lines provided in the COLR converted from power to delta-temperature and adjusted for uncertainty.
The limiting heat flux conditions for DNB are higher than those calculated for the range of all control rods fully withdrawn to the maximum allowable control rod insertion assuming the axial power imbalance or Delta-I (I) is within the limits of the f1 (Delta I) function of the Overtemperature Delta Temperature trip. When the axial power imbalance exceeds the tolerance (or deadband) of the f1(l) trip reset function, the Overtemperature Delta Temperature trip set point is reduced by the values in the COLR to provide protection required by the core safety limits.
Similarly, the limiting linear heat generation rate conditions for CFM are higher than those calculated for the range of all control rods from fully withdrawn to the maximum allowable control rod insertion assuming the axial power imbalance or Delta-I (I) is within the limits of the f2(I) function of the Overpower-Delta Temperature trip. When the axial power imbalance exceeds the tolerance (or deadband) of the f2(I) trip reset function, the Overpower-Delta Temperature trip set point is reduced by the values specified in the COLR to provide protection required by the core safety limits.
Insert Pages B 2.1.1-1b Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 30 of 38


Limit System Settings (Reactor Trip System trip limits). The plant trip set points are verified to be less than the limits defined by the safety limit lines provided in the COLR converted from power to delta-temperature and adjusted for uncertainty.
Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 31 of 38 Reactor Core SLs B 2.1.1 BASES APPLICABLE         The fuel cladding must not sustain damage as a result of normal SAFETY             operation and AOOs. The reactor core SLs are established to preclude ANALYSES           violation of the following fuel design criteria:
The limiting heat flux conditions for DNB are higher than those calculated for the range of all control rods fully withdrawn to the maximum allowable control rod insertion assuming the axial power imbalance or Delta-I (I) is within the limits of the f 1 (Delta I) function of the Overtemperature Delta Temperature trip. When the axial power imbalance exceeds the tolerance (or deadband) of the f 1 (l) trip reset function, the Overtemperature Delta Temperature trip set point is reduced by the values in the COLR to provide protection required by the core safety limits.  
 
Similarly, the limiting linear heat generation rate conditions for CFM are higher than those calculated for the range of all control rods from fully withdrawn to the maximum allowable control rod insertion assuming the axial power imbalance or Delta-I (I) is within the limits of the f 2 (I) function of the Overpower-Delta Temperature trip. When the axial power imbalance exceeds the tolerance (or deadband) of the f 2 (I) trip reset function, the Overpower-Delta Temperature trip set point is reduced by the values specified in the COLR to provide protection required by the core safety limits.
 
1 Reactor Core SLs B 2.1.1   Westinghouse STS B 2.1.1-2 Rev. 4.0  1Revision XXX SEQUOYAH UNIT 2 BASES  
 
APPLICABLE The fuel cladding must not sustain damage as a result of normal SAFETY   operation and AOOs. The reactor core SLs are established to preclude ANALYSES violation of the following fuel design criteria:
: a. There must be at least 95% probability at a 95% confidence level (the 95/95 DNB criterion) that the hot fuel rod in the core does not experience DNB and
: a. There must be at least 95% probability at a 95% confidence level (the 95/95 DNB criterion) that the hot fuel rod in the core does not experience DNB and
: b. The hot fuel pellet in the core must not experience centerline fuel melting. The Reactor Trip System setpoints (Ref. 2), in combination with all the LCOs, are designed to prevent any anticipated combination of transient conditions for Reactor Coolant System (RCS) temperature, pressure, RCS Flow, I, and THERMAL POWER level that would result in a departure from nucleate boiling ratio (DNBR) of less than the DNBR limit and preclude the existence of flow instabilities.  
: b. The hot fuel pellet in the core must not experience centerline fuel melting.
 
1 The Reactor Trip System setpoints (Ref. 2), in combination with all the LCOs, are designed to prevent any anticipated combination of transient conditions for Reactor Coolant System (RCS) temperature, pressure, RCS Flow, I, and THERMAL POWER level that would result in a departure from nucleate boiling ratio (DNBR) of less than the DNBR limit and preclude the existence of flow instabilities.
Automatic enforcement of these reactor core SLs is provided by the appropriate operation of the RPS and the steam generator safety valves.  
Automatic enforcement of these reactor core SLs is provided by the appropriate operation of the RPS and the steam generator safety valves.
 
The SLs represent a design requirement for establishing the RPS trip setpoints identified previously. LCO 3.4.1, "RCS Pressure, Temperature, and Flow Departure from Nucleate Boiling (DNB) Limits," or the assumed           U initial conditions of the safety analyses (as indicated in the FSAR, Ref. 2)       1 provide more restrictive limits to ensure that the SLs are not exceeded.
The SLs represent a design requirement for establishing the RPS trip setpoints identified previously. LCO 3.4.1, "RCS Pressure, Temperature, and Flow Departure from Nucleate Boiling (DNB) Limits," or the assumed initial conditions of the safety analyses (as indicated in the FSAR, Ref. 2) provide more restrictive limits to ensure that the SLs are not exceeded.  
SAFETY LIMITS       The figure provided in the COLR shows the loci of points of THERMAL POWER, RCS pressure, and average temperature for which the minimum DNBR is not less than the safety analyses limit, that fuel centerline temperature remains below melting, that the average enthalpy in the hot leg is less than or equal to the enthalpy of saturated liquid, or that the exit quality is within the limits defined by the DNBR correlation.
 
SAFETY LIMITS The figure provided in the COLR shows the loci of points of THERMAL POWER, RCS pressure, and average temperature for which the minimum DNBR is not less than the safety analyses limit, that fuel centerline temperature remains below melting, that the average enthalpy in the hot leg is less than or equal to the enthalpy of saturated liquid, or that the exit quality is within the limits defined by the DNBR correlation.
The reactor core SLs are established to preclude violation of the following fuel design criteria:
The reactor core SLs are established to preclude violation of the following fuel design criteria:
: a. There must be at least a 95% probability at a 95% confidence level (the 95/95 DNB criterion) that the hot fuel rod in the core does not experience DNB and
: a. There must be at least a 95% probability at a 95% confidence level (the 95/95 DNB criterion) that the hot fuel rod in the core does not experience DNB and
: b. There must be at least a 95% probability at a 95% confidence level that the hot fuel pellet in the core does not experience centerline fuel melting. U 1 1 Reactor Core SLs B 2.1.1    Westinghouse STS B 2.1.1-3 Rev. 4.0 1SEQUOYAH UNIT 2 Revision XXX BASES
: b. There must be at least a 95% probability at a 95% confidence level that the hot fuel pellet in the core does not experience centerline fuel melting.
 
SEQUOYAH UNIT 2                                               Revision XXX Westinghouse STS                             B 2.1.1-2                                      Rev. 4.0   1 Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 31 of 38
SAFETY LIMITS  (continued)


Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 32 of 38 Reactor Core SLs B 2.1.1 BASES SAFETY LIMITS (continued)
The reactor core SLs are used to define the various RPS functions such that the above criteria are satisfied during steady state operation, normal operational transients, and anticipated operational occurrences (AOOs).
The reactor core SLs are used to define the various RPS functions such that the above criteria are satisfied during steady state operation, normal operational transients, and anticipated operational occurrences (AOOs).
To ensure that the RPS precludes the violation of the above criteria, additional criteria are applied to the Overtemperature and Overpower T reactor trip functions. That is, it must be demonstrated that the average enthalpy in the hot leg is less than or equal to the saturation enthalpy and that the core exit quality is within the limits defined by the DNBR correlation. Appropriate functioning of the RPS ensures that for variations in the THERMAL POWER, RCS Pressure, RCS average temperature, RCS flow rate, and I that the reactor core SLs will be satisfied during steady state operation, normal operational transients, and AOOs.  
To ensure that the RPS precludes the violation of the above criteria, additional criteria are applied to the Overtemperature and Overpower T reactor trip functions. That is, it must be demonstrated that the average enthalpy in the hot leg is less than or equal to the saturation enthalpy and that the core exit quality is within the limits defined by the DNBR correlation. Appropriate functioning of the RPS ensures that for variations in the THERMAL POWER, RCS Pressure, RCS average temperature, RCS flow rate, and I that the reactor core SLs will be satisfied during steady state operation, normal operational transients, and AOOs.
 
APPLICABILITY       SL 2.1.1 only applies in MODES 1 and 2 because these are the only MODES in which the reactor is critical. Automatic protection functions are required to be OPERABLE during MODES 1 and 2 to ensure operation within the reactor core SLs. The steam generator safety valves or automatic protection actions serve to prevent RCS heatup to the reactor core SL conditions or to initiate a reactor trip function, which forces the unit into MODE 3. Setpoints for the reactor trip functions are specified in LCO 3.3.1, "Reactor Trip System (RTS) Instrumentation." In MODES 3, 4, 5, and 6, Applicability is not required since the reactor is not generating significant THERMAL POWER.
APPLICABILITY SL 2.1.1 only applies in MODES 1 and 2 because these are the only MODES in which the reactor is critical. Automatic protection functions are required to be OPERABLE during MODES 1 and 2 to ensure operation within the reactor core SLs. The steam generator safety valves or automatic protection actions serve to prevent RCS heatup to the reactor core SL conditions or to initiate a reactor trip function, which forces the unit into MODE 3. Setpoints for the reactor trip functions are specified in LCO 3.3.1, "Reactor Trip System (RTS) Instrumentation." In MODES 3, 4, 5, and 6, Applicability is not required since the reactor is not generating significant THERMAL POWER.
SAFETY LIMIT         The following SL violation responses are applicable to the reactor core VIOLATIONS           SLs. If SL 2.1.1 is violated, the requirement to go to MODE 3 places the unit in a MODE in which this SL is not applicable.
SAFETY LIMIT The following SL violation responses are applicable to the reactor core VIOLATIONS SLs. If SL 2.1.1 is violated, the requirement to go to MODE 3 places the unit in a MODE in which this SL is not applicable.
The allowed Completion Time of 1 hour recognizes the importance of bringing the unit to a MODE of operation where this SL is not applicable, and reduces the probability of fuel damage.
The allowed Completion Time of 1 hour recognizes the importance of bringing the unit to a MODE of operation where this SL is not applicable, and reduces the probability of fuel damage.  
REFERENCES           1. 10 CFR 50, Appendix A, GDC 10.
 
U
REFERENCES 1. 10 CFR 50, Appendix A, GDC 10.
: 2. FSAR, Section [7.2].                                                       1   2 SEQUOYAH UNIT 2                                                   Revision XXX Westinghouse STS                             B 2.1.1-3                                        Rev. 4.0   1 Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 32 of 38
: 2. FSAR, Section
[7.2]. U 1 2 RCS Pressure SL B 2.1.2    Westinghouse STS B 2.1.2-1 Rev. 4.0 1SEQUOYAH UNIT 2 Revision XXX B 2.0  SAFETY LIMITS (SLs)
 
B 2.1.2 Reactor Coolant System (RCS) Pressure SL 
 
BASES BACKGROUND The SL on RCS pressure protects the integrity of the RCS against overpressurization. In the event of fuel cladding failure, fission products are released into the reactor coolant. The RCS then serves as the primary barrier in preventing the release of fission products into the atmosphere. By establishing an upper limit on RCS pressure, the continued integrity of the RCS is ensured. According to 10 CFR 50, Appendix A, GDC 14, "Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary," and GDC 15, "Reactor Coolant System Design" (Ref. 1), the reactor pressure coolant boundary (RCPB) design conditions are not to be exceeded during normal operation and anticipated operational occurrences (AOOs). Also, in accordance with GDC 28, "Reac tivity Limits" (Ref. 1), reactivity accidents, including rod ejection, do not result in damage to the RCPB
 
greater than limited local yielding.
The design pressure of the RCS is 2500 psia. During normal operation and AOOs, RCS pressure is limited from exceeding the design pressure by more than 10%, in accordance with Section III of the ASME Code (Ref. 2). To ensure system integrity, all RCS components are hydrostatically tested at 125% of design pressure, according to the ASME Code requirements prior to initial operation when there is no fuel in the core. Following inception of unit operation, RCS components shall be pressure tested, in accordance with the requirements of ASME Code, Section XI (Ref. 3).


Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 33 of 38 RCS Pressure SL B 2.1.2 B 2.0 SAFETY LIMITS (SLs)
B 2.1.2 Reactor Coolant System (RCS) Pressure SL BASES BACKGROUND          The SL on RCS pressure protects the integrity of the RCS against overpressurization. In the event of fuel cladding failure, fission products are released into the reactor coolant. The RCS then serves as the primary barrier in preventing the release of fission products into the atmosphere. By establishing an upper limit on RCS pressure, the continued integrity of the RCS is ensured. According to 10 CFR 50, Appendix A, GDC 14, "Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary," and coolant GDC 15, "Reactor Coolant System Design" (Ref. 1), the reactor pressure coolant boundary (RCPB) design conditions are not to be exceeded                  3 during normal operation and anticipated operational occurrences (AOOs).
Also, in accordance with GDC 28, "Reactivity Limits" (Ref. 1), reactivity accidents, including rod ejection, do not result in damage to the RCPB greater than limited local yielding.
2485 psig 1
The design pressure of the RCS is 2500 psia. During normal operation and AOOs, RCS pressure is limited from exceeding the design pressure by more than 10%, in accordance with Section III of the ASME Code (Ref. 2). To ensure system integrity, all RCS components are hydrostatically tested at 125% of design pressure, according to the ASME Code requirements prior to initial operation when there is no fuel in the core. Following inception of unit operation, RCS components shall be pressure tested, in accordance with the requirements of ASME Code, Section XI (Ref. 3).
Overpressurization of the RCS could result in a breach of the RCPB. If such a breach occurs in conjunction with a fuel cladding failure, fission products could enter the containment atmosphere, raising concerns relative to limits on radioactive releases specified in 10 CFR 100, "Reactor Site Criteria" (Ref. 4).
Overpressurization of the RCS could result in a breach of the RCPB. If such a breach occurs in conjunction with a fuel cladding failure, fission products could enter the containment atmosphere, raising concerns relative to limits on radioactive releases specified in 10 CFR 100, "Reactor Site Criteria" (Ref. 4).
APPLICABLE The RCS pressurizer safety valves, the main steam safety valves SAFETY (MSSVs), and the reactor high pressure trip have settings established ANALYSES to ensure that the RCS pressure SL will not be exceeded.   
APPLICABLE           The RCS pressurizer safety valves, the main steam safety valves SAFETY               (MSSVs), and the reactor high pressure trip have settings established ANALYSES             to ensure that the RCS pressure SL will not be exceeded.
The RCS pressurizer safety valves are sized to prevent system pressure from exceeding the design pressure by more than 10%, as specified in Section III of the ASME Code for Nuclear Power Plant Components (Ref. 2). The transient that establishes the required relief capacity, and hence valve size requirements and lift settings, is a complete loss of SEQUOYAH UNIT 2                                                Revision XXX Westinghouse STS                            B 2.1.2-1                                      Rev. 4.0 1 Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 33 of 38


The RCS pressurizer safety valves are sized to prevent system pressure from exceeding the design pressure by more than 10%, as specified in Section III of the ASME Code for Nuclear Power Plant Components (Ref. 2). The transient that establishes the required relief capacity, and hence valve size requirements and lift settings, is a complete loss of coolant2485 psig 3 1 RCS Pressure SL B 2.1.2   Westinghouse STS B 2.1.2-2 Rev. 4.0  1SEQUOYAH UNIT 2 Revision XXX BASES  
Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 34 of 38 RCS Pressure SL B 2.1.2 BASES APPLICABLE SAFETY ANALYSES (continued) external load without a direct reactor trip. During the transient, no control actions are assumed, except that the safety valves on the secondary plant are assumed to open when the steam pressure reaches the secondary plant safety valve settings, and nominal feedwater supply is maintained.
 
APPLICABLE SAFETY ANALYSES (continued)  
 
external load without a direct reactor trip. During the transient, no control actions are assumed, except that the safety valves on the secondary plant are assumed to open when the steam pressure reaches the  
 
secondary plant safety valve settings, and nominal feedwater supply is  
 
maintained.
The Reactor Trip System setpoints (Ref. 5), together with the settings of the MSSVs, provide pressure protection for normal operation and AOOs.
The Reactor Trip System setpoints (Ref. 5), together with the settings of the MSSVs, provide pressure protection for normal operation and AOOs.
The reactor high pressure trip setpoint is specifically set to provide protection against overpressurization (Ref. 5). The safety analyses for both the high pressure trip and the RCS pressurizer safety valves are performed using conservative assumptions relative to pressure control devices. More specifically, no credit is taken for operation of any of the following:
The reactor high pressure trip setpoint is specifically set to provide protection against overpressurization (Ref. 5). The safety analyses for both the high pressure trip and the RCS pressurizer safety valves are performed using conservative assumptions relative to pressure control devices.
: a. Pressurizer power operated relief valves (PORVs)
More specifically, no credit is taken for operation of any of the following:
,
: a. Pressurizer power operated relief valves (PORVs),
: b. Steam line relief valve,
                                                                              ;                  4
: c. Steam Dump System
: b. Steam line relief valve, b                                                                      4
d. Reactor Control System
: c. Steam Dump System, c                                                                          5
e. Pressurizer Level Control System
: d. Reactor Control System, 4
, or
d
: f. Pressurizer spray valve.
: e. Pressurizer Level Control System, or                                     4 e
SAFETY LIMITS The maximum transient pressure allowed in the RCS pressure vessel under the ASME Code, Section III, is 110% of design pressure. The maximum transient pressure allowed in the RCS piping, valves, and fittings under
: f. Pressurizer spray valve.                                                 4 SAFETY LIMITS       The maximum transient pressure allowed in the RCS pressure vessel under the ASME Code, Section III, is 110% of design pressure. The maximum transient pressure allowed in the RCS piping, valves, and fittings under [USAS, Section B31.1 (Ref. 6)] is 120% of design pressure.       2 The most limiting of these two allowances is the 110% of design pressure; therefore, the SL on maximum allowable RCS pressure is 2735 psig.
[USAS, Section B31.1 (Ref. 6)
SEQUOYAH UNIT 2                                             Revision XXX Westinghouse STS                           B 2.1.2-2                                    Rev. 4.0   1 Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 34 of 38
] is 120% of design pressure. The most limiting of these two allowances is the 110% of design pressure; therefore, the SL on maximum allowable RCS pressure is 2735 psig.
 
2 b c d e 4 4 4 4 4; ; 5 RCS Pressure SL B 2.1.2    Westinghouse STS B 2.1.2-3 Rev. 4.0 1SEQUOYAH UNIT 2 Revision XXX BASES
 
APPLICABILITY SL 2.1.2 applies in MODES 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 because this SL could be approached or exceeded in these MODES due to overpressurization events. The SL is not applicable in MODE 6 because the reactor vessel head closure bolts are not fully tightened, making it unlikely that the RCS can be pressurized. 


SAFETY LIMIT If the RCS pressure SL is violated when the reactor is in MODE 1 VIOLATIONS or 2, the requirement is to restore compliance and be in MODE 3 within 1 hour. Exceeding the RCS pressure SL may cause immediate RCS failure and create a potential for radioactive releases in excess of 10 CFR 100, "Reactor Site Criteria," limits (Ref. 4).
Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 35 of 38 RCS Pressure SL B 2.1.2 BASES APPLICABILITY      SL 2.1.2 applies in MODES 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 because this SL could be approached or exceeded in these MODES due to overpressurization events. The SL is not applicable in MODE 6 because the reactor vessel head closure bolts are not fully tightened, making it unlikely that the RCS can be pressurized.
SAFETY LIMIT       If the RCS pressure SL is violated when the reactor is in MODE 1 VIOLATIONS         or 2, the requirement is to restore compliance and be in MODE 3 within 1 hour.
Exceeding the RCS pressure SL may cause immediate RCS failure and create a potential for radioactive releases in excess of 10 CFR 100, "Reactor Site Criteria," limits (Ref. 4).
The allowable Completion Time of 1 hour recognizes the importance of reducing power level to a MODE of operation where the potential for challenges to safety systems is minimized.
The allowable Completion Time of 1 hour recognizes the importance of reducing power level to a MODE of operation where the potential for challenges to safety systems is minimized.
If the RCS pressure SL is exceeded in MODE 3, 4, or 5, RCS pressure must be restored to within the SL value within 5 minutes. Exceeding the RCS pressure SL in MODE 3, 4, or 5 is more severe than exceeding this SL in MODE 1 or 2, since the reactor vessel temperature may be lower and the vessel material, consequently, less ductile. As such, pressure must be reduced to less than the SL within 5 minutes. The action does not require reducing MODES, since this would require reducing temperature, which would compound the problem by adding thermal gradient stresses to the existing pressure stress.  
If the RCS pressure SL is exceeded in MODE 3, 4, or 5, RCS pressure must be restored to within the SL value within 5 minutes. Exceeding the RCS pressure SL in MODE 3, 4, or 5 is more severe than exceeding this SL in MODE 1 or 2, since the reactor vessel temperature may be lower and the vessel material, consequently, less ductile. As such, pressure must be reduced to less than the SL within 5 minutes. The action does not require reducing MODES, since this would require reducing temperature, which would compound the problem by adding thermal gradient stresses to the existing pressure stress.
 
REFERENCES         1. 10 CFR 50, Appendix A, GDC 14, GDC 15, and GDC 28.
REFERENCES 1. 10 CFR 50, Appendix A, GDC 14, GDC 15, and GDC 28.
: 2. ASME, Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section III, Article NB-7000.                                                           1
: 2. ASME, Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section III, Article NB-7000.
                                              , 1971
: 3. ASME, Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section XI, Article IWX-5000.
: 3. ASME, Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section XI, Article IWX-5000.
: 4. 10 CFR 100.
: 4. 10 CFR 100.
: 5. FSAR, Section
U
[7.2].
: 5. FSAR, Section [7.2].                                                     1 2
: 6. USAS B31.1, Standard Code for Pressure Piping, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1967.
: 6. USAS B31.1, Standard Code for Pressure Piping, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1967.
2, 1971 U 1 1 JUSTIFICATION FOR DEVIATIONS ITS CHAPTER 2.0 BASES, SAFETY LIMITS (SLs)
SEQUOYAH UNIT 2                                             Revision XXX Westinghouse STS                          B 2.1.2-3                                      Rev. 4.0  1 Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 35 of 38
Sequoyah Unit 1 and Unit 2 Page 1 of 1 1. Changes are made (additions, deletions, and/or changes) to the ISTS Bases that reflect the plant specific nomenclature, number, reference, system description, analysis, or licensing basis description.
 
Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 36 of 38 JUSTIFICATION FOR DEVIATIONS ITS CHAPTER 2.0 BASES, SAFETY LIMITS (SLs)
: 1. Changes are made (additions, deletions, and/or changes) to the ISTS Bases that reflect the plant specific nomenclature, number, reference, system description, analysis, or licensing basis description.
: 2. The ISTS contains bracketed information and/or values that are generic to Westinghouse vintage plants. The brackets are removed and the proper plant specific information/value is inserted to reflect the current licensing basis.
: 2. The ISTS contains bracketed information and/or values that are generic to Westinghouse vintage plants. The brackets are removed and the proper plant specific information/value is inserted to reflect the current licensing basis.
: 3. Typographical/grammatical error corrected.
: 3. Typographical/grammatical error corrected.
: 4. The steam line relief valves are removed from the list of items that have no credit taken for operation. The steam line safety valves are credited with protecting the Reactor Coolant System and the steam generators against overpressure for all load losses. Additionally, the subsequent items have been renumbered.
: 4. The steam line relief valves are removed from the list of items that have no credit taken for operation. The steam line safety valves are credited with protecting the Reactor Coolant System and the steam generators against overpressure for all load losses. Additionally, the subsequent items have been renumbered.
: 5. The punctuation corrections have been made consistent with the Writer's Guide for the Improved Standard Technical Specifications, NEI 01-03, Section 5.1.3.
: 5. The punctuation corrections have been made consistent with the Writer's Guide for the Improved Standard Technical Specifications, NEI 01-03, Section 5.1.3.
Specific No Significant Haza rds Considerations (NSHCs)  
Sequoyah Unit 1 and Unit 2              Page 1 of 1 Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 36 of 38
 
Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 37 of 38 Specific No Significant Hazards Considerations (NSHCs)
Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 37 of 38


DETERMINATION OF NO SIGNIFICANT HAZARDS CONSIDERATIONS ITS CHAPTER 2.0, SAFETY LIMITS (SLs)
Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 38 of 38 DETERMINATION OF NO SIGNIFICANT HAZARDS CONSIDERATIONS ITS CHAPTER 2.0, SAFETY LIMITS (SLs)
Sequoyah Unit 1 and 2 Page 1 of 1 There are no specific No Significant Hazards Considerations for this Specification.}}
There are no specific No Significant Hazards Considerations for this Specification.
Sequoyah Unit 1 and 2                  Page 1 of 1 Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 38 of 38}}

Latest revision as of 17:14, 25 February 2020

Enclosure 2 - Volume 4 - Improved Technical Specifications Conversion, ITS Chapter 2.0, Safety Limits, Revision 0
ML13329A854
Person / Time
Site: Sequoyah  Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 11/22/2013
From:
Tennessee Valley Authority
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML13329A881 List:
References
NUREG-1431, Rev 4
Download: ML13329A854 (38)


Text

Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 1 of 38 ENCLOSURE 2 VOLUME 4 SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 IMPROVED TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS CONVERSION ITS CHAPTER 2.0 SAFETY LIMITS Revision 0 Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 1 of 38

Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 2 of 38 LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

1. ITS Chapter 2.0, Safety Limits Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 2 of 38

, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 3 of 38 ATTACHMENT 1 ITS Chapter 2.0, SAFETY LIMITS (SLs) , Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 3 of 38

Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 4 of 38 Current Technical Specification (CTS) Markup and Discussion of Changes (DOCs)

Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 4 of 38

Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 5 of 38 A01 ITS ITS Chapter 2.0 2.0 SAFETY LIMITS AND LIMITING SAFETY SYSTEM SETTINGS 2.1 2.1 SAFETY LIMITS REACTOR CORE 2.1.1 2.1.1 The combination of THERMAL POWER, pressurizer pressure, and the highest operating loop coolant temperature (Tavg) shall not exceed the limits shown in Figure 2.1-1 and the following SLs shall not be exceeded:. in the COLR LA01 2.1.1.1 The departure from nucleate boiling ratio (DNBR) shall be maintained 1.132 for the BHTP correlation, 1.21 for the BWU-N correlation, and 1.21 for the BWCMV correlation.

2.1.1.2 The maximum local fuel pin centerline temperature shall be maintained 4901°F, decreasing by 13.7°F per 10,000 MWD/MTU of burnup for COPERNIC applications, and 4642°F, decreasing by 58°F per 10,000 MWD/MTU of burnup for TACO3 applications.

Applicability APPLICABILITY: MODES 1 and 2.

ACTION:

2.2.1 If SL 2.1.1 is violated, restore compliance and be in HOT STANDBY within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br />.

REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM PRESSURE 2.1.2 2.1.2 The Reactor Coolant System pressure shall not exceed 2735 psig.

Applicability APPLICABILITY: MODES 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.

ACTION:

2.2.2.1 MODES 1 and 2 2.2.2.1 Whenever the Reactor Coolant System pressure has exceeded 2735 psig, be in HOT STANDBY with the Reactor Coolant System pressure within its limit within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br />.

2.2.2.2 MODES 3, 4 and 5 2.2.2.2 Whenever the Reactor Coolant System pressure has exceeded 2735 psig, reduce the Reactor Coolant System pressure to within its limit within 5 minutes.

September 26, 2012 SEQUOYAH - UNIT 1 2-1 Amendment No. 41, 331 Page 1 of 6 Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 5 of 38

Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 6 of 38 ITS ITS Chapter 2.0 Figure 2.1 1 Reaeter Cere Safety timit Feur teeps in Operatien UNACCEPTABLE OPERATION ACCEPTABLE OPERATION September 26,2012 SEQUOYAH - UNIT 1 2-2 Amendment No. 19, 331 Page 2 of 6 Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 6 of 38

Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 7 of 38 A01 ITS ITS Chapter 2.0 This page deleted.

September 3, 1985 SEQUOYAH - UNIT 1 2-3 Amendment No. 41 Page 3 of 6 Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 7 of 38

Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 8 of 38 A01 ITS ITS Chapter 2.0 2.0 SAFETY LIMITS AND LIMITING SAFETY SYSTEM SETTINGS 2.1 2.1 SAFETY LIMITS REACTOR CORE 2.1.1 2.1.1 The combination of THERMAL POWER, pressurizer pressure, and the highest operating loop coolant temperature (Tavg) shall not exceed the limits shown in Figure 2.1-1 and the following SLs shall not be exceeded: in the COLR LA01 2.1.1.1 The departure from nucleate boiling ratio (DNBR) shall be maintained 1.132 for the BHTP correlation, 1.21 for the BWU-N correlation, and 1.21 for the BWCMV correlation.

2.1.1.2 The maximum local fuel pin centerline temperature shall be maintained 4901°F, decreasing by 13.7°F per 10,000 MWD/MTU of burnup for COPERNIC applications, and 4642°F, decreasing by 58°F per 10,000 MWD/MTU of burnup for TACO3 applications.

Applicability APPLICABILITY: MODES 1 and 2.

ACTION:

2.2.1 If SL 2.1.1 is violated, restore compliance and be in HOT STANDBY within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br />.

REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM PRESSURE 2.1.2 2.1.2 The Reactor Coolant System pressure shall not exceed 2735 psig.

Applicability APPLICABILITY: MODES 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.

ACTION:

2.2.2.1 MODES 1 and 2 2.2.2.1 Whenever the Reactor Coolant System pressure has exceeded 2735 psig, be in HOT STANDBY with the Reactor Coolant System pressure within its limit within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br />.

2.2.2.2 MODES 3, 4 and 5 Whenever the Reactor Coolant System pressure has exceeded 2735 psig, reduce the Reactor 2.2.2.2 Coolant System pressure to within its limit within 5 minutes.

SEQUOYAH - UNIT 2 2-1 September 26, 2012 Amendment No. 33, 324 Page 4 of 6 Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 8 of 38

Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page I of 38 ITS (D ITS Chapter 2.0 Figure 2.1 1 Reaeter Cere Safety timit Feur teeps in Operatien 680 UNACCEPTAB LE 660 OPERATIOT\

\

\ 24OO psia

\ \

640 \ 2250 psia \

\

\

6n \ - 1985 psia \

IL g-'

o

\ \.\\

F \ \

I \ 1775 psra

\

U' (J

E 600 \\ \

\

580 ACCEPTABLE OPERATION

\

560

\

540 FRACTION OF RATED THERMAL POWER September 26,2012 SEQUOYAH - UNIT 2 2-2 Amendment No. 21 ,324 Page 5 of 6 Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page I of 38

Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 10 of 38 A01 ITS ITS Chapter 2.0 This page deleted.

September 3, 1985 SEQUOYAH - UNIT 2 2-3 Amendment No. 33 Page 6 of 6 Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 10 of 38

Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 11 of 38 DISCUSSION OF CHANGES ITS CHAPTER 2.0, SAFETY LIMITS (SLs)

ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES A01 In the conversion of the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant (SQN) Current Technical Specifications (CTS) to the plant specific Improved Technical Specifications (ITS), certain changes (wording preferences, editorial changes, reformatting, revised numbering, etc.) are made to obtain consistency with NUREG-1431, Rev. 4.0, "Standard Technical Specifications - Westinghouse Plants" (ISTS) and additional Technical Specification Task Force (TSTF) travelers included in this submittal.

These changes are designated as administrative changes and are acceptable because they do not result in technical changes to the CTS.

MORE RESTRICTIVE CHANGES None RELOCATED SPECIFICATIONS None REMOVED DETAIL CHANGES LA01 (Type 6 - Removal of Cycle - Specific Limits from the Technical Specifications to the Core Operating Limits Report) CTS 2.1.1 requires the combination of THERMAL POWER, pressurizer pressure, and the highest operating loop coolant temperature (Tavg) not to exceed the limits shown in Figure 2.1-1. ITS 2.1.1 states the combination of THERMAL POWER, Reactor Coolant System (RCS) highest loop average temperature, and pressurizer pressure shall not exceed the limits specified in the COLR. This changes the CTS by moving limits that must be confirmed on a cycle specific bases to the COLR. The Reactor Core safety limits are retained in Technical Specification Chapter 2.0.

The removal of these cycle specific parameter limits from the Technical Specifications to the COLR and the retention of the limiting Safety Limits in the Technical Specifications is acceptable because the cycle specific limits are developed or utilized under NRC-approved methodologies that ensure the Safety Limits are met. The NRC documented in Generic Letter 88-16, "Removal of Cycle-Specific Parameter Limits From Technical Specifications," that this type of information is not necessary to be included in the Technical Specifications to provide adequate protection of public health and safety. The ITS still retains the Safety Limits. NRC-approved Topical Report WCAP-14483-A, "Generic Methodology for Expanded Core Operating Limits Report," determined that the specific values for these parameters may be relocated to the COLR provided the SLs continue to appear in the Technical Specifications. The methodologies used to develop the parameters in the COLR were approved by the NRC in accordance with Generic Letter 88-16. Additionally, this change is acceptable because the removed information will be adequately controlled in the COLR Sequoyah Unit 1 and Unit 2 Page 1 of 2 Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 11 of 38

Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 12 of 38 DISCUSSION OF CHANGES ITS CHAPTER 2.0, SAFETY LIMITS (SLs) under the requirements provided in ITS 5.6.3, "Core Operating Limits Report."

ITS 5.6.3 ensures that the applicable limits of the safety analysis are met (e.g.,

fuel thermal mechanical limits, core thermal hydraulic limits, Emergency Core Cooling Systems limits, and nuclear limits such as SDM, transient analysis limits, and accident analysis limits). This change is designated as a less restrictive removal of detail change because information relating to cycle specific parameter limits is being removed from the Technical Specifications.

LESS RESTRICTIVE CHANGES None Sequoyah Unit 1 and Unit 2 Page 2 of 2 Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 12 of 38

Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 13 of 38 Improved Standard Technical Specifications (ISTS) Markup and Justification for Deviations (JFDs)

Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 13 of 38

Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 14 of 38 CTS SLs 2.0 2.0 SAFETY LIMITS (SLs) 2.1 2.1 SLs 2.1.1, 2.1.1 Reactor Core SLs 2.1.1 Applicability In MODES 1 and 2, the combination of THERMAL POWER, Reactor Coolant System (RCS) highest loop average temperature, and pressurizer pressure shall not exceed the limits specified in the COLR; and the following SLs shall not be exceeded:

2.1.1.1 2.1.1.1 The departure from nucleate boiling ratio (DNBR) shall be maintained

[1.17 for the WRB-1/WRB-2 DNB correlations]. INSERT 1 1

maximum local fuel pin 2.1.1.2 2.1.1.2 The peak fuel centerline temperature shall be maintained < [5080°F, 2 1

decreasing by 58°F per 10,000 MWD/MTU of burnup].

INSERT 2 2.1.2, 2.1.2 Reactor Coolant System Pressure SL 2.1.2 Applicability In MODES 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, the RCS pressure shall be maintained [2735] psig. 1 2.2 SAFETY LIMIT VIOLATIONS 2.1.1 2.2.1 If SL 2.1.1 is violated, restore compliance and be in MODE 3 within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br />.

ACTION 2.1.2 2.2.2 If SL 2.1.2 is violated:

ACTION 2.1.2 2.2.2.1 In MODE 1 or 2, restore compliance and be in MODE 3 within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br />.

ACTION 2.1.2 2.2.2.2 In MODE 3, 4, or 5, restore compliance within 5 minutes.

ACTION SEQUOYAH UNIT 1 Amendment XXX Westinghouse STS 2.0-1 Rev. 4.0 2 Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 14 of 38

Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 15 of 38 CTS 2.1.1 1

INSERT 1 1.132 for the BHTP correlation, 1.21 for the BWU-N correlation, and 1.21 for the BWCMV correlation.

1 INSERT 2 4901°F, decreasing by 13.7°F per 10,000 MWD/MTU of burnup for COPERNIC applications, and 4642°F, decreasing by 58°F per 10,000 MWD/MTU of burnup for TACO3 applications Insert Page 2.0-1 Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 15 of 38

CTS SLs 2.0 2.0 SAFETY LIMITS (SLs) 2.1 2.1 SLs 2.1.1, 2.1.1 Reactor Core SLs 2.1.1 Applicability In MODES 1 and 2, the combination of THERMAL POWER, Reactor Coolant System (RCS) highest loop average temperature, and pressurizer pressure shall not exceed the limits specified in the COLR; and the following SLs shall not be exceeded:

2.1.1.1 2.1.1.1 The departure from nucleate boiling ratio (DNBR) shall be maintained

[1.17 for the WRB-1/WRB-2 DNB correlations]. INSERT 1 1

maximum local fuel pin 2.1.1.2 2.1.1.2 The peak fuel centerline temperature shall be maintained < [5080°F, 2 1

decreasing by 58°F per 10,000 MWD/MTU of burnup].

INSERT 2 2.1.2, 2.1.2 Reactor Coolant System Pressure SL 2.1.2 Applicability In MODES 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, the RCS pressure shall be maintained [2735] psig. 1 2.2 SAFETY LIMIT VIOLATIONS 2.1.1 2.2.1 If SL 2.1.1 is violated, restore compliance and be in MODE 3 within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br />.

ACTION 2.1.2 2.2.2 If SL 2.1.2 is violated:

ACTION 2.1.2 2.2.2.1 In MODE 1 or 2, restore compliance and be in MODE 3 within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br />.

ACTION 2.1.2 2.2.2.2 In MODE 3, 4, or 5, restore compliance within 5 minutes.

ACTION SEQUOYAH UNIT 2 Amendment XXX Westinghouse STS 2.0-1 Rev. 4.0 2

Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 17 of 38 CTS 2.1.1 1

INSERT 1 1.132 for the BHTP correlation, 1.21 for the BWU-N correlation, and 1.21 for the BWCMV correlation.

1 INSERT 2 4901°F, decreasing by 13.7°F per 10,000 MWD/MTU of burnup for COPERNIC applications, and 4642°F, decreasing by 58°F per 10,000 MWD/MTU of burnup for TACO3 applications Insert Page 2.0-1 Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 17 of 38

Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 18 of 38 JUSTIFICATION FOR DEVIATIONS ITS CHAPTER 2.0, SAFETY LIMITS (SLs)

1. The ISTS contains bracketed information and/or values that are generic to Westinghouse vintage plants. The brackets are removed and the proper plant specific information/value is inserted to reflect the current licensing basis.
2. Changes are made (additions, deletions, and/or changes) to the ISTS that reflect the plant specific nomenclature, number, reference, system description, analysis, or licensing basis description.

Sequoyah Unit 1 and Unit 2 Page 1 of 1 Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 18 of 38

Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 19 of 38 Improved Standard Technical Specifications (ISTS) Bases Markup and Bases Justification for Deviations (JFDs)

Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 19 of 38

Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 20 of 38 Reactor Core SLs B 2.1.1 B 2.0 SAFETY LIMITS (SLs)

B 2.1.1 Reactor Core BASES BACKGROUND GDC 10 (Ref. 1) requires that specified acceptable fuel design limits are not exceeded during steady state operation, normal operational transients, and anticipated operational occurrences (AOOs). This is accomplished by having a departure from nucleate boiling (DNB) design basis, which corresponds to a 95% probability at a 95% confidence level (the 95/95 DNB criterion) that DNB will not occur and by requiring that fuel centerline temperature stays below the melting temperature.

INSERT 1 The restrictions of this SL prevent overheating of the fuel and cladding, as 1 well as possible cladding perforation, which would result in the release of fission products to the reactor coolant. Overheating of the fuel is prevented by maintaining the steady state peak linear heat rate (LHR) below the level at which fuel centerline melting occurs. Overheating of the fuel cladding is prevented by restricting fuel operation to within the nucleate boiling regime, where the heat transfer coefficient is large and the cladding surface temperature is slightly above the coolant saturation temperature.

Fuel centerline melting occurs when the local LHR, or power peaking, in a region of the fuel is high enough to cause the fuel centerline temperature to reach the melting point of the fuel. Expansion of the pellet upon centerline melting may cause the pellet to stress the cladding to the point of failure, allowing an uncontrolled release of activity to the reactor coolant.

corresponding significant Operation above the boundary of the nucleate boiling regime could result in excessive cladding temperature because of the onset of DNB and the resultant sharp reduction in heat transfer coefficient. Inside the steam 1 INSERT 2 film, high cladding temperatures are reached, and a cladding water (zirconium water) reaction may take place. This chemical reaction results in oxidation of the fuel cladding to a structurally weaker form. This weaker form may lose its integrity, resulting in an uncontrolled release of activity to the reactor coolant. INSERT 3 1 The proper functioning of the Reactor Protection System (RPS) and steam generator safety valves prevents violation of the reactor core SLs.

SEQUOYAH UNIT 1 Revision XXX Westinghouse STS B 2.1.1-1 Rev. 4.0 1 Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 20 of 38

Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 21 of 38 B 2.0 1

INSERT 1 (due to departure from nucleate boiling) and overheating of the fuel pellet (centerline fuel melt(CFM)), either of which could result in 1

INSERT 2 from the outer surface of the cladding to the reactor coolant water 1

INSERT 3 DNB is not a directly measurable parameter during operation and therefore THERMAL POWER and Reactor Coolant Temperature and Pressure have been related to DNB. The DNB correlations have been developed to predict the DNB flux and the location of DNB for axially uniform and non-uniform heat flux distributions. The local DNB heat flux ratio, DNBR, defined as the ratio of the heat flux that would cause DNB at a particular core location to the local heat flux, is indicative of the margin to DNB.

To meet the DNB Design Basis, a statistical core design (SCD) process has been used to develop an appropriate statistical DNBR design limit. Uncertainties in plant operating parameters, nuclear and thermal parameters, and fuel fabrication parameters are considered statistically such that there is at least a 95 percent probability at a 95 percent confidence level that the minimum DNBR for the limiting rod is greater than or equal to the DNBR limit. This DNBR uncertainty derived from the SCD analysis, combined with the applicable DNB critical heat flux correlation limit, establishes the statistical DNBR design limit which must be met in plant safety analysis using values of input parameters without adjustment for uncertainty.

Operation above the maximum local linear heat generation rate for fuel melting could result in excessive fuel pellet temperature and cause melting of the fuel at its centerline. Fuel centerline melting occurs when the local LHR, or power peaking, in a region of the fuel is high enough to cause the fuel centerline temperature to reach the melting point of the fuel. Expansion of the pellet upon centerline melting may cause the pellet to stress the cladding to the point of failure, allowing an uncontrolled release of activity to the reactor coolant. The melting point of uranium dioxide varies slightly with burnup. As uranium is depleted and fission products produced, the net effect is a decrease in the melting point. Fuel centerline temperature is not a directly measurable parameter during operation. The maximum local fuel pin centerline temperature is maintained by limiting the local linear heat generation rate in the fuel. The local linear heat generation rate in the fuel is limited so that the maximum fuel centerline temperature will not exceed the value acceptance criteria in the safety analysis.

Insert Pages B 2.1.1-1a Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 21 of 38

Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 22 of 38 B 2.0 1

INSERT 3 (cont)

The curves provided in the COLR show the loci of points of THERMAL POWER, Reactor Coolant System pressure and average temperature for which the minimum DNBR is no less than the safety analysis DNBR limit, or the average enthalpy at the vessel exit is equal to the enthalpy of saturated liquid.

These lines are bounding for all fuel types. The curves provided in the COLR are based upon enthalpy rise hot channel factors that result in acceptable DNBR performance of each fuel type.

Acceptable DNBR performance is assured by operation within the DNB-based Limiting Safety Limit System Settings (Reactor Trip System trip limits). The plant trip set points are verified to be less than the limits defined by the safety limit lines provided in the COLR converted from power to delta-temperature and adjusted for uncertainty.

The limiting heat flux conditions for DNB are higher than those calculated for the range of all control rods fully withdrawn to the maximum allowable control rod insertion assuming the axial power imbalance or Delta-I (I) is within the limits of the f1 (Delta I) function of the Overtemperature Delta Temperature trip. When the axial power imbalance exceeds the tolerance (or deadband) of the f1(l) trip reset function, the Overtemperature Delta Temperature trip set point is reduced by the values in the COLR to provide protection required by the core safety limits.

Similarly, the limiting linear heat generation rate conditions for CFM are higher than those calculated for the range of all control rods from fully withdrawn to the maximum allowable control rod insertion assuming the axial power imbalance or Delta-I (I) is within the limits of the f2(I) function of the Overpower-Delta Temperature trip. When the axial power imbalance exceeds the tolerance (or deadband) of the f2(I) trip reset function, the Overpower-Delta Temperature trip set point is reduced by the values specified in the COLR to provide protection required by the core safety limits.

Insert Pages B 2.1.1-1b Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 22 of 38

Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 23 of 38 Reactor Core SLs B 2.1.1 BASES APPLICABLE The fuel cladding must not sustain damage as a result of normal SAFETY operation and AOOs. The reactor core SLs are established to preclude ANALYSES violation of the following fuel design criteria:

a. There must be at least 95% probability at a 95% confidence level (the 95/95 DNB criterion) that the hot fuel rod in the core does not experience DNB and
b. The hot fuel pellet in the core must not experience centerline fuel melting.

1 The Reactor Trip System setpoints (Ref. 2), in combination with all the LCOs, are designed to prevent any anticipated combination of transient conditions for Reactor Coolant System (RCS) temperature, pressure, RCS Flow, I, and THERMAL POWER level that would result in a departure from nucleate boiling ratio (DNBR) of less than the DNBR limit and preclude the existence of flow instabilities.

Automatic enforcement of these reactor core SLs is provided by the appropriate operation of the RPS and the steam generator safety valves.

The SLs represent a design requirement for establishing the RPS trip setpoints identified previously. LCO 3.4.1, "RCS Pressure, Temperature, and Flow Departure from Nucleate Boiling (DNB) Limits," or the assumed U initial conditions of the safety analyses (as indicated in the FSAR, Ref. 2) 1 provide more restrictive limits to ensure that the SLs are not exceeded.

SAFETY LIMITS The figure provided in the COLR shows the loci of points of THERMAL POWER, RCS pressure, and average temperature for which the minimum DNBR is not less than the safety analyses limit, that fuel centerline temperature remains below melting, that the average enthalpy in the hot leg is less than or equal to the enthalpy of saturated liquid, or that the exit quality is within the limits defined by the DNBR correlation.

The reactor core SLs are established to preclude violation of the following fuel design criteria:

a. There must be at least a 95% probability at a 95% confidence level (the 95/95 DNB criterion) that the hot fuel rod in the core does not experience DNB and
b. There must be at least a 95% probability at a 95% confidence level that the hot fuel pellet in the core does not experience centerline fuel melting.

SEQUOYAH UNIT 1 Revision XXX Westinghouse STS B 2.1.1-2 Rev. 4.0 1 Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 23 of 38

Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 24 of 38 Reactor Core SLs B 2.1.1 BASES SAFETY LIMITS (continued)

The reactor core SLs are used to define the various RPS functions such that the above criteria are satisfied during steady state operation, normal operational transients, and anticipated operational occurrences (AOOs).

To ensure that the RPS precludes the violation of the above criteria, additional criteria are applied to the Overtemperature and Overpower T reactor trip functions. That is, it must be demonstrated that the average enthalpy in the hot leg is less than or equal to the saturation enthalpy and that the core exit quality is within the limits defined by the DNBR correlation. Appropriate functioning of the RPS ensures that for variations in the THERMAL POWER, RCS Pressure, RCS average temperature, RCS flow rate, and I that the reactor core SLs will be satisfied during steady state operation, normal operational transients, and AOOs.

APPLICABILITY SL 2.1.1 only applies in MODES 1 and 2 because these are the only MODES in which the reactor is critical. Automatic protection functions are required to be OPERABLE during MODES 1 and 2 to ensure operation within the reactor core SLs. The steam generator safety valves or automatic protection actions serve to prevent RCS heatup to the reactor core SL conditions or to initiate a reactor trip function, which forces the unit into MODE 3. Setpoints for the reactor trip functions are specified in LCO 3.3.1, "Reactor Trip System (RTS) Instrumentation." In MODES 3, 4, 5, and 6, Applicability is not required since the reactor is not generating significant THERMAL POWER.

SAFETY LIMIT The following SL violation responses are applicable to the reactor core VIOLATIONS SLs. If SL 2.1.1 is violated, the requirement to go to MODE 3 places the unit in a MODE in which this SL is not applicable.

The allowed Completion Time of 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> recognizes the importance of bringing the unit to a MODE of operation where this SL is not applicable, and reduces the probability of fuel damage.

REFERENCES 1. 10 CFR 50, Appendix A, GDC 10.

U

2. FSAR, Section [7.2]. 1 2 SEQUOYAH UNIT 1 Revision XXX Westinghouse STS B 2.1.1-3 Rev. 4.0 1 Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 24 of 38

Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 25 of 38 RCS Pressure SL B 2.1.2 B 2.0 SAFETY LIMITS (SLs)

B 2.1.2 Reactor Coolant System (RCS) Pressure SL BASES BACKGROUND The SL on RCS pressure protects the integrity of the RCS against overpressurization. In the event of fuel cladding failure, fission products are released into the reactor coolant. The RCS then serves as the primary barrier in preventing the release of fission products into the atmosphere. By establishing an upper limit on RCS pressure, the continued integrity of the RCS is ensured. According to 10 CFR 50, Appendix A, GDC 14, "Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary," and coolant GDC 15, "Reactor Coolant System Design" (Ref. 1), the reactor pressure coolant boundary (RCPB) design conditions are not to be exceeded 3 during normal operation and anticipated operational occurrences (AOOs).

Also, in accordance with GDC 28, "Reactivity Limits" (Ref. 1), reactivity accidents, including rod ejection, do not result in damage to the RCPB greater than limited local yielding.

2485 psig 1

The design pressure of the RCS is 2500 psia. During normal operation and AOOs, RCS pressure is limited from exceeding the design pressure by more than 10%, in accordance with Section III of the ASME Code (Ref. 2). To ensure system integrity, all RCS components are hydrostatically tested at 125% of design pressure, according to the ASME Code requirements prior to initial operation when there is no fuel in the core. Following inception of unit operation, RCS components shall be pressure tested, in accordance with the requirements of ASME Code,Section XI (Ref. 3).

Overpressurization of the RCS could result in a breach of the RCPB. If such a breach occurs in conjunction with a fuel cladding failure, fission products could enter the containment atmosphere, raising concerns relative to limits on radioactive releases specified in 10 CFR 100, "Reactor Site Criteria" (Ref. 4).

APPLICABLE The RCS pressurizer safety valves, the main steam safety valves SAFETY (MSSVs), and the reactor high pressure trip have settings established ANALYSES to ensure that the RCS pressure SL will not be exceeded.

The RCS pressurizer safety valves are sized to prevent system pressure from exceeding the design pressure by more than 10%, as specified in Section III of the ASME Code for Nuclear Power Plant Components (Ref. 2). The transient that establishes the required relief capacity, and hence valve size requirements and lift settings, is a complete loss of SEQUOYAH UNIT 1 Revision XXX Westinghouse STS B 2.1.2-1 Rev. 4.0 1 Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 25 of 38

Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 26 of 38 RCS Pressure SL B 2.1.2 BASES APPLICABLE SAFETY ANALYSES (continued) external load without a direct reactor trip. During the transient, no control actions are assumed, except that the safety valves on the secondary plant are assumed to open when the steam pressure reaches the secondary plant safety valve settings, and nominal feedwater supply is maintained.

The Reactor Trip System setpoints (Ref. 5), together with the settings of the MSSVs, provide pressure protection for normal operation and AOOs.

The reactor high pressure trip setpoint is specifically set to provide protection against overpressurization (Ref. 5). The safety analyses for both the high pressure trip and the RCS pressurizer safety valves are performed using conservative assumptions relative to pressure control devices.

More specifically, no credit is taken for operation of any of the following:

a. Pressurizer power operated relief valves (PORVs),
4
b. Steam line relief valve, b 4
c. Steam Dump System, c 5
d. Reactor Control System, 4

d

e. Pressurizer Level Control System, or 4 e
f. Pressurizer spray valve. 4 SAFETY LIMITS The maximum transient pressure allowed in the RCS pressure vessel under the ASME Code,Section III, is 110% of design pressure. The maximum transient pressure allowed in the RCS piping, valves, and fittings under [USAS, Section B31.1 (Ref. 6)] is 120% of design pressure. 2 The most limiting of these two allowances is the 110% of design pressure; therefore, the SL on maximum allowable RCS pressure is 2735 psig.

SEQUOYAH UNIT 1 Revision XXX Westinghouse STS B 2.1.2-2 Rev. 4.0 1 Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 26 of 38

Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 27 of 38 RCS Pressure SL B 2.1.2 BASES APPLICABILITY SL 2.1.2 applies in MODES 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 because this SL could be approached or exceeded in these MODES due to overpressurization events. The SL is not applicable in MODE 6 because the reactor vessel head closure bolts are not fully tightened, making it unlikely that the RCS can be pressurized.

SAFETY LIMIT If the RCS pressure SL is violated when the reactor is in MODE 1 VIOLATIONS or 2, the requirement is to restore compliance and be in MODE 3 within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br />.

Exceeding the RCS pressure SL may cause immediate RCS failure and create a potential for radioactive releases in excess of 10 CFR 100, "Reactor Site Criteria," limits (Ref. 4).

The allowable Completion Time of 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> recognizes the importance of reducing power level to a MODE of operation where the potential for challenges to safety systems is minimized.

If the RCS pressure SL is exceeded in MODE 3, 4, or 5, RCS pressure must be restored to within the SL value within 5 minutes. Exceeding the RCS pressure SL in MODE 3, 4, or 5 is more severe than exceeding this SL in MODE 1 or 2, since the reactor vessel temperature may be lower and the vessel material, consequently, less ductile. As such, pressure must be reduced to less than the SL within 5 minutes. The action does not require reducing MODES, since this would require reducing temperature, which would compound the problem by adding thermal gradient stresses to the existing pressure stress.

REFERENCES 1. 10 CFR 50, Appendix A, GDC 14, GDC 15, and GDC 28.

2. ASME, Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code,Section III, Article NB-7000. 1

, 1971

3. ASME, Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code,Section XI, Article IWX-5000.
4. 10 CFR 100.

U

5. FSAR, Section [7.2]. 1 2
6. USAS B31.1, Standard Code for Pressure Piping, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1967.

SEQUOYAH UNIT 1 Revision XXX Westinghouse STS B 2.1.2-3 Rev. 4.0 1 Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 27 of 38

Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 28 of 38 Reactor Core SLs B 2.1.1 B 2.0 SAFETY LIMITS (SLs)

B 2.1.1 Reactor Core BASES BACKGROUND GDC 10 (Ref. 1) requires that specified acceptable fuel design limits are not exceeded during steady state operation, normal operational transients, and anticipated operational occurrences (AOOs). This is accomplished by having a departure from nucleate boiling (DNB) design basis, which corresponds to a 95% probability at a 95% confidence level (the 95/95 DNB criterion) that DNB will not occur and by requiring that fuel centerline temperature stays below the melting temperature.

INSERT 1 The restrictions of this SL prevent overheating of the fuel and cladding, as 1 well as possible cladding perforation, which would result in the release of fission products to the reactor coolant. Overheating of the fuel is prevented by maintaining the steady state peak linear heat rate (LHR) below the level at which fuel centerline melting occurs. Overheating of the fuel cladding is prevented by restricting fuel operation to within the nucleate boiling regime, where the heat transfer coefficient is large and the cladding surface temperature is slightly above the coolant saturation temperature.

Fuel centerline melting occurs when the local LHR, or power peaking, in a region of the fuel is high enough to cause the fuel centerline temperature to reach the melting point of the fuel. Expansion of the pellet upon centerline melting may cause the pellet to stress the cladding to the point of failure, allowing an uncontrolled release of activity to the reactor coolant.

corresponding significant Operation above the boundary of the nucleate boiling regime could result in excessive cladding temperature because of the onset of DNB and the resultant sharp reduction in heat transfer coefficient. Inside the steam 1 INSERT 2 film, high cladding temperatures are reached, and a cladding water (zirconium water) reaction may take place. This chemical reaction results in oxidation of the fuel cladding to a structurally weaker form. This weaker form may lose its integrity, resulting in an uncontrolled release of activity to the reactor coolant. INSERT 3 1 The proper functioning of the Reactor Protection System (RPS) and steam generator safety valves prevents violation of the reactor core SLs.

SEQUOYAH UNIT 2 Revision XXX Westinghouse STS B 2.1.1-1 Rev. 4.0 1 Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 28 of 38

Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 29 of 38 B 2.0 1

INSERT 1 (due to departure from nucleate boiling) and overheating of the fuel pellet (centerline fuel melt(CFM)), either of which could result in 1

INSERT 2 from the outer surface of the cladding to the reactor coolant water 1

INSERT 3 DNB is not a directly measurable parameter during operation and therefore THERMAL POWER and Reactor Coolant Temperature and Pressure have been related to DNB. The DNB correlations have been developed to predict the DNB flux and the location of DNB for axially uniform and non-uniform heat flux distributions. The local DNB heat flux ratio, DNBR, defined as the ratio of the heat flux that would cause DNB at a particular core location to the local heat flux, is indicative of the margin to DNB.

To meet the DNB Design Basis, a statistical core design (SCD) process has been used to develop an appropriate statistical DNBR design limit. Uncertainties in plant operating parameters, nuclear and thermal parameters, and fuel fabrication parameters are considered statistically such that there is at least a 95 percent probability at a 95 percent confidence level that the minimum DNBR for the limiting rod is greater than or equal to the DNBR limit. This DNBR uncertainty derived from the SCD analysis, combined with the applicable DNB critical heat flux correlation limit, establishes the statistical DNBR design limit which must be met in plant safety analysis using values of input parameters without adjustment for uncertainty.

Operation above the maximum local linear heat generation rate for fuel melting could result in excessive fuel pellet temperature and cause melting of the fuel at its centerline. Fuel centerline melting occurs when the local LHR, or power peaking, in a region of the fuel is high enough to cause the fuel centerline temperature to reach the melting point of the fuel. Expansion of the pellet upon centerline melting may cause the pellet to stress the cladding to the point of failure, allowing an uncontrolled release of activity to the reactor coolant. The melting point of uranium dioxide varies slightly with burnup. As uranium is depleted and fission products produced, the net effect is a decrease in the melting point. Fuel centerline temperature is not a directly measurable parameter during operation. The maximum local fuel pin centerline temperature is maintained by limiting the local linear heat generation rate in the fuel. The local linear heat generation rate in the fuel is limited so that the maximum fuel centerline temperature will not exceed the value acceptance criteria in the safety analysis.

Insert Pages B 2.1.1-1a Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 29 of 38

Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 30 of 38 B 2.0 1

INSERT 3 (cont)

The curves provided in the COLR show the loci of points of THERMAL POWER, Reactor Coolant System pressure and average temperature for which the minimum DNBR is no less than the safety analysis DNBR limit, or the average enthalpy at the vessel exit is equal to the enthalpy of saturated liquid.

These lines are bounding for all fuel types. The curves provided in the COLR are based upon enthalpy rise hot channel factors that result in acceptable DNBR performance of each fuel type.

Acceptable DNBR performance is assured by operation within the DNB-based Limiting Safety Limit System Settings (Reactor Trip System trip limits). The plant trip set points are verified to be less than the limits defined by the safety limit lines provided in the COLR converted from power to delta-temperature and adjusted for uncertainty.

The limiting heat flux conditions for DNB are higher than those calculated for the range of all control rods fully withdrawn to the maximum allowable control rod insertion assuming the axial power imbalance or Delta-I (I) is within the limits of the f1 (Delta I) function of the Overtemperature Delta Temperature trip. When the axial power imbalance exceeds the tolerance (or deadband) of the f1(l) trip reset function, the Overtemperature Delta Temperature trip set point is reduced by the values in the COLR to provide protection required by the core safety limits.

Similarly, the limiting linear heat generation rate conditions for CFM are higher than those calculated for the range of all control rods from fully withdrawn to the maximum allowable control rod insertion assuming the axial power imbalance or Delta-I (I) is within the limits of the f2(I) function of the Overpower-Delta Temperature trip. When the axial power imbalance exceeds the tolerance (or deadband) of the f2(I) trip reset function, the Overpower-Delta Temperature trip set point is reduced by the values specified in the COLR to provide protection required by the core safety limits.

Insert Pages B 2.1.1-1b Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 30 of 38

Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 31 of 38 Reactor Core SLs B 2.1.1 BASES APPLICABLE The fuel cladding must not sustain damage as a result of normal SAFETY operation and AOOs. The reactor core SLs are established to preclude ANALYSES violation of the following fuel design criteria:

a. There must be at least 95% probability at a 95% confidence level (the 95/95 DNB criterion) that the hot fuel rod in the core does not experience DNB and
b. The hot fuel pellet in the core must not experience centerline fuel melting.

1 The Reactor Trip System setpoints (Ref. 2), in combination with all the LCOs, are designed to prevent any anticipated combination of transient conditions for Reactor Coolant System (RCS) temperature, pressure, RCS Flow, I, and THERMAL POWER level that would result in a departure from nucleate boiling ratio (DNBR) of less than the DNBR limit and preclude the existence of flow instabilities.

Automatic enforcement of these reactor core SLs is provided by the appropriate operation of the RPS and the steam generator safety valves.

The SLs represent a design requirement for establishing the RPS trip setpoints identified previously. LCO 3.4.1, "RCS Pressure, Temperature, and Flow Departure from Nucleate Boiling (DNB) Limits," or the assumed U initial conditions of the safety analyses (as indicated in the FSAR, Ref. 2) 1 provide more restrictive limits to ensure that the SLs are not exceeded.

SAFETY LIMITS The figure provided in the COLR shows the loci of points of THERMAL POWER, RCS pressure, and average temperature for which the minimum DNBR is not less than the safety analyses limit, that fuel centerline temperature remains below melting, that the average enthalpy in the hot leg is less than or equal to the enthalpy of saturated liquid, or that the exit quality is within the limits defined by the DNBR correlation.

The reactor core SLs are established to preclude violation of the following fuel design criteria:

a. There must be at least a 95% probability at a 95% confidence level (the 95/95 DNB criterion) that the hot fuel rod in the core does not experience DNB and
b. There must be at least a 95% probability at a 95% confidence level that the hot fuel pellet in the core does not experience centerline fuel melting.

SEQUOYAH UNIT 2 Revision XXX Westinghouse STS B 2.1.1-2 Rev. 4.0 1 Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 31 of 38

Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 32 of 38 Reactor Core SLs B 2.1.1 BASES SAFETY LIMITS (continued)

The reactor core SLs are used to define the various RPS functions such that the above criteria are satisfied during steady state operation, normal operational transients, and anticipated operational occurrences (AOOs).

To ensure that the RPS precludes the violation of the above criteria, additional criteria are applied to the Overtemperature and Overpower T reactor trip functions. That is, it must be demonstrated that the average enthalpy in the hot leg is less than or equal to the saturation enthalpy and that the core exit quality is within the limits defined by the DNBR correlation. Appropriate functioning of the RPS ensures that for variations in the THERMAL POWER, RCS Pressure, RCS average temperature, RCS flow rate, and I that the reactor core SLs will be satisfied during steady state operation, normal operational transients, and AOOs.

APPLICABILITY SL 2.1.1 only applies in MODES 1 and 2 because these are the only MODES in which the reactor is critical. Automatic protection functions are required to be OPERABLE during MODES 1 and 2 to ensure operation within the reactor core SLs. The steam generator safety valves or automatic protection actions serve to prevent RCS heatup to the reactor core SL conditions or to initiate a reactor trip function, which forces the unit into MODE 3. Setpoints for the reactor trip functions are specified in LCO 3.3.1, "Reactor Trip System (RTS) Instrumentation." In MODES 3, 4, 5, and 6, Applicability is not required since the reactor is not generating significant THERMAL POWER.

SAFETY LIMIT The following SL violation responses are applicable to the reactor core VIOLATIONS SLs. If SL 2.1.1 is violated, the requirement to go to MODE 3 places the unit in a MODE in which this SL is not applicable.

The allowed Completion Time of 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> recognizes the importance of bringing the unit to a MODE of operation where this SL is not applicable, and reduces the probability of fuel damage.

REFERENCES 1. 10 CFR 50, Appendix A, GDC 10.

U

2. FSAR, Section [7.2]. 1 2 SEQUOYAH UNIT 2 Revision XXX Westinghouse STS B 2.1.1-3 Rev. 4.0 1 Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 32 of 38

Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 33 of 38 RCS Pressure SL B 2.1.2 B 2.0 SAFETY LIMITS (SLs)

B 2.1.2 Reactor Coolant System (RCS) Pressure SL BASES BACKGROUND The SL on RCS pressure protects the integrity of the RCS against overpressurization. In the event of fuel cladding failure, fission products are released into the reactor coolant. The RCS then serves as the primary barrier in preventing the release of fission products into the atmosphere. By establishing an upper limit on RCS pressure, the continued integrity of the RCS is ensured. According to 10 CFR 50, Appendix A, GDC 14, "Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary," and coolant GDC 15, "Reactor Coolant System Design" (Ref. 1), the reactor pressure coolant boundary (RCPB) design conditions are not to be exceeded 3 during normal operation and anticipated operational occurrences (AOOs).

Also, in accordance with GDC 28, "Reactivity Limits" (Ref. 1), reactivity accidents, including rod ejection, do not result in damage to the RCPB greater than limited local yielding.

2485 psig 1

The design pressure of the RCS is 2500 psia. During normal operation and AOOs, RCS pressure is limited from exceeding the design pressure by more than 10%, in accordance with Section III of the ASME Code (Ref. 2). To ensure system integrity, all RCS components are hydrostatically tested at 125% of design pressure, according to the ASME Code requirements prior to initial operation when there is no fuel in the core. Following inception of unit operation, RCS components shall be pressure tested, in accordance with the requirements of ASME Code,Section XI (Ref. 3).

Overpressurization of the RCS could result in a breach of the RCPB. If such a breach occurs in conjunction with a fuel cladding failure, fission products could enter the containment atmosphere, raising concerns relative to limits on radioactive releases specified in 10 CFR 100, "Reactor Site Criteria" (Ref. 4).

APPLICABLE The RCS pressurizer safety valves, the main steam safety valves SAFETY (MSSVs), and the reactor high pressure trip have settings established ANALYSES to ensure that the RCS pressure SL will not be exceeded.

The RCS pressurizer safety valves are sized to prevent system pressure from exceeding the design pressure by more than 10%, as specified in Section III of the ASME Code for Nuclear Power Plant Components (Ref. 2). The transient that establishes the required relief capacity, and hence valve size requirements and lift settings, is a complete loss of SEQUOYAH UNIT 2 Revision XXX Westinghouse STS B 2.1.2-1 Rev. 4.0 1 Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 33 of 38

Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 34 of 38 RCS Pressure SL B 2.1.2 BASES APPLICABLE SAFETY ANALYSES (continued) external load without a direct reactor trip. During the transient, no control actions are assumed, except that the safety valves on the secondary plant are assumed to open when the steam pressure reaches the secondary plant safety valve settings, and nominal feedwater supply is maintained.

The Reactor Trip System setpoints (Ref. 5), together with the settings of the MSSVs, provide pressure protection for normal operation and AOOs.

The reactor high pressure trip setpoint is specifically set to provide protection against overpressurization (Ref. 5). The safety analyses for both the high pressure trip and the RCS pressurizer safety valves are performed using conservative assumptions relative to pressure control devices.

More specifically, no credit is taken for operation of any of the following:

a. Pressurizer power operated relief valves (PORVs),
4
b. Steam line relief valve, b 4
c. Steam Dump System, c 5
d. Reactor Control System, 4

d

e. Pressurizer Level Control System, or 4 e
f. Pressurizer spray valve. 4 SAFETY LIMITS The maximum transient pressure allowed in the RCS pressure vessel under the ASME Code,Section III, is 110% of design pressure. The maximum transient pressure allowed in the RCS piping, valves, and fittings under [USAS, Section B31.1 (Ref. 6)] is 120% of design pressure. 2 The most limiting of these two allowances is the 110% of design pressure; therefore, the SL on maximum allowable RCS pressure is 2735 psig.

SEQUOYAH UNIT 2 Revision XXX Westinghouse STS B 2.1.2-2 Rev. 4.0 1 Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 34 of 38

Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 35 of 38 RCS Pressure SL B 2.1.2 BASES APPLICABILITY SL 2.1.2 applies in MODES 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 because this SL could be approached or exceeded in these MODES due to overpressurization events. The SL is not applicable in MODE 6 because the reactor vessel head closure bolts are not fully tightened, making it unlikely that the RCS can be pressurized.

SAFETY LIMIT If the RCS pressure SL is violated when the reactor is in MODE 1 VIOLATIONS or 2, the requirement is to restore compliance and be in MODE 3 within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br />.

Exceeding the RCS pressure SL may cause immediate RCS failure and create a potential for radioactive releases in excess of 10 CFR 100, "Reactor Site Criteria," limits (Ref. 4).

The allowable Completion Time of 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> recognizes the importance of reducing power level to a MODE of operation where the potential for challenges to safety systems is minimized.

If the RCS pressure SL is exceeded in MODE 3, 4, or 5, RCS pressure must be restored to within the SL value within 5 minutes. Exceeding the RCS pressure SL in MODE 3, 4, or 5 is more severe than exceeding this SL in MODE 1 or 2, since the reactor vessel temperature may be lower and the vessel material, consequently, less ductile. As such, pressure must be reduced to less than the SL within 5 minutes. The action does not require reducing MODES, since this would require reducing temperature, which would compound the problem by adding thermal gradient stresses to the existing pressure stress.

REFERENCES 1. 10 CFR 50, Appendix A, GDC 14, GDC 15, and GDC 28.

2. ASME, Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code,Section III, Article NB-7000. 1

, 1971

3. ASME, Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code,Section XI, Article IWX-5000.
4. 10 CFR 100.

U

5. FSAR, Section [7.2]. 1 2
6. USAS B31.1, Standard Code for Pressure Piping, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1967.

SEQUOYAH UNIT 2 Revision XXX Westinghouse STS B 2.1.2-3 Rev. 4.0 1 Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 35 of 38

Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 36 of 38 JUSTIFICATION FOR DEVIATIONS ITS CHAPTER 2.0 BASES, SAFETY LIMITS (SLs)

1. Changes are made (additions, deletions, and/or changes) to the ISTS Bases that reflect the plant specific nomenclature, number, reference, system description, analysis, or licensing basis description.
2. The ISTS contains bracketed information and/or values that are generic to Westinghouse vintage plants. The brackets are removed and the proper plant specific information/value is inserted to reflect the current licensing basis.
3. Typographical/grammatical error corrected.
4. The steam line relief valves are removed from the list of items that have no credit taken for operation. The steam line safety valves are credited with protecting the Reactor Coolant System and the steam generators against overpressure for all load losses. Additionally, the subsequent items have been renumbered.
5. The punctuation corrections have been made consistent with the Writer's Guide for the Improved Standard Technical Specifications, NEI 01-03, Section 5.1.3.

Sequoyah Unit 1 and Unit 2 Page 1 of 1 Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 36 of 38

Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 37 of 38 Specific No Significant Hazards Considerations (NSHCs)

Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 37 of 38

Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 38 of 38 DETERMINATION OF NO SIGNIFICANT HAZARDS CONSIDERATIONS ITS CHAPTER 2.0, SAFETY LIMITS (SLs)

There are no specific No Significant Hazards Considerations for this Specification.

Sequoyah Unit 1 and 2 Page 1 of 1 Enclosure 2, Volume 4, Rev. 0, Page 38 of 38