ML19079A281: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
| author name =  
| author name =  
| author affiliation = Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI)
| author affiliation = Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI)
| addressee name = Holahan T K
| addressee name = Holahan T
| addressee affiliation = NRC/NMSS
| addressee affiliation = NRC/NMSS
| docket = PROJ0689
| docket = PROJ0689
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Summary of Recommended Changes to Regulatory Guides 1.226 and 1.228 to Support Issuance of Final Mitigation of Beyond Design Basis Events Rule Page 1 of 2 NEI 06-12, "B.5.b Phase 2 & 3 Submittal Guideline" This document should be endorsed in its entirety as an acceptable method to meet the requirements of 10 CFR 50.155(b)(2
{{#Wiki_filter:Summary of Recommended Changes to Regulatory Guides 1.226 and 1.228 to Support Issuance of Final Mitigation of Beyond Design Basis Events Rule NEI 06-12, B.5.b Phase 2 & 3 Submittal Guideline
). NEI 12-01, "Guideline for Assessing Beyond Design Basis Accident Response Staffing and Communications Capabilities
* This document should be endorsed in its entirety as an acceptable method to meet the requirements of 10 CFR 50.155(b)(2).
"  The endorsement should make clear that the requirements of 10 CFR 50.155(f) do not apply to a change to communications equipment not directly related to implementation of mitigation strategies for beyond
NEI 12-01, Guideline for Assessing Beyond Design Basis Accident Response Staffing and Communications Capabilities
-design-basis external events (e.g., equipment used to make offsite notifications)
* The endorsement should make clear that the requirements of 10 CFR 50.155(f) do not apply to a change to communications equipment not directly related to implementation of mitigation strategies for beyond-design-basis external events (e.g., equipment used to make offsite notifications).
. The following paragraph was struck from the rule statements of consideration; however, it was not directly related to rule compliance
* The following paragraph was struck from the rule statements of consideration; however, it was not directly related to rule compliance. Rather, it was included to address important operating experience from inspections conducted in accordance with Temporary Instruction (TI) 2515/191, Inspection of the Implementation of Mitigation Strategies and Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation Orders and Emergency Preparedness Communication/Staffing/Multi-Unit Dose Assessment Plans.
. Rather, it was included to address important operating experience from inspections conducted in accordance with Temporary Instruction (TI) 2515/191, "Inspection of the Implementation of Mitigation Strategies and Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation Orders and Emergency Preparedness Communication/Staffing/Multi
To maintain uniform understanding of offsite notification timing requirements going forward, wording similar to this paragraph should be included in the appropriate regulatory guide.
-Unit Dose Assessment Plans
Therefore, any communication capability enhancement made by a licensee in response to the assessment did not need to meet the design capabilities for the communications system required by 10 CFR part 50, appendix E or testing frequencies described for primary and backup onsite and offsite communications systems. Any enhanced communications system, equipment, or power supply implemented as a result of the § 50.54(f) assessment was not necessary to meet the requirement to notify offsite emergency response organizations within 15 minutes of an emergency declaration or to meet the monthly communications testing requirement for contiguous State/local governments within the plume exposure pathway emergency planning zone.
." To maintain uniform understanding of offsite notification timing requirements going forward, wording similar to this paragraph should be included in the appropriate regulatory guide.
NEI 12-06, Diverse and Flexible Coping Strategies (FLEX) Implementation Guide
"Therefore, any communication capability enhancement made by a licensee in response to the assessment did not need to meet the design capabilities for the communications system required by 10 CFR part 50, appendix E or testing frequencies described for primary and backup onsite and offsite communications systems. Any enhanced communications system, equipment, or power supply implemented as a result of the § 50.54(f) assessment was not necessary to meet the requirement to notify offsite emergency response organizations within 15 minutes of an emergency declaration or to meet the monthly communications testing requirement for contiguous State/local governments within the plume exposure pathway emergency planning zone.
* Any references to severe accident management/severe accident management guidelines and NEI 14-01, Emergency Response Procedures and Guidelines for Beyond Design Basis Events and Severe Accidents, should not be endorsed. Further, the endorsement wording should indicate that severe accident management guidelines are developed and maintained in accordance with licensee commitments. 1 1
" NEI 12-06, "Diverse and Flexible Coping Strategies (FLEX) Implementation Guide
See NEI 12-06 Revision 4, Sections 1.3 and 11.4 Page 1 of 2
"  Any references to severe accident management/severe accident management guidelines and NEI 14-01, "Emergency Response Procedures and Guidelines for Beyond Design Basis Events and Severe Accidents," should not be endorsed. Further, the endorsement wording should indicate that severe accident management guidelines are developed and maintained in accordance with licensee commitments.
1                                        


1 See NEI 12
Summary of Recommended Changes to Regulatory Guides 1.226 and 1.228 to Support Issuance of Final Mitigation of Beyond Design Basis Events Rule
-06 Revision 4, Sections 1.3 and 11.4
* The endorsement wording should be clear that licensee use of the Systematic Approach to Training (SAT) process is not necessary to meet the requirement of 10 CFR 50.155(d); it may or may not be used. 2
 
* The endorsement wording should be clear that licensee implementation of drills and exercises is not necessary to meet the requirement of 10 CFR 50.155(d); they may or may not be conducted. 3 NEI 13-06, Enhancements to Emergency Response Capabilities for Beyond Design Basis Events and Severe Accidents
Summary of Recommended Changes to Regulatory Guides 1.226 and 1.228 to Support Issuance of Final Mitigation of Beyond Design Basis Events Rule Page 2 of 2  The endorsement wording should be clear that licensee use of the Systematic Approach to Training (SAT) process is not necessary to meet the requirement of 10 CFR 50.155(d); it may or may not be used.2 The endorsement wording should be clear that licensee implementation of drills and exercises is not necessary to meet the requirement of 10 CFR 50.155(d); they may or may not be conducted.
* Section 2, Multi-Unit Dose Assessment, should not be endorsed.
3 NEI 13-06, "Enhancements to Emergency Response Capabilities for Beyond Design Basis Events and Severe Accidents"  Section 2, "Multi-Unit Dose Assessment," should not be endorsed.
* The endorsement wording should be clear that licensee use of the SAT process is not necessary to meet the requirement of 10 CFR 50.155(d); it may or may not be used.
The endorsement wording should be clear that licensee use of the SAT process is not necessary to meet the requirement of 10 CFR 50.155(d); it may or may not be used
* There should be no endorsement of the training guidance related to qualifications.
. There should be no endorsement of the training guidance related to "qualifications
* There should be no endorsement of the training guidance related to the Ultimate Decision-Maker, nor its single reference in Appendix A.
."  There should be no endorsement of the training guidance related to the "Ultimate Decision
* Section 4, EP Facilities and Equipment, should not be endorsed.
-Maker," nor its single reference in Appendix A.
* The endorsement wording should be clear that licensee implementation of drills and exercises is not necessary to meet the requirement of 10 CFR 50.155(d); they may or may not be conducted.
Section 4, "EP Facilities and Equipment," should not be endorsed.
* The endorsement wording should state that the guidance for conducting drills and exercises involving Extensive Damage Mitigation Guidelines (EDMGs) may or may not be used to meet the
The endorsement wording should be clear that licensee implementation of drills and exercises is not necessary to meet the requirement of 10 CFR 50.155(d); they may or may not be conducted.
          § 50.54(hh)(2) exercise requirement in 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Section IV.F.2.j, at the licensees discretion.
The endorsement wording should state that the guidance for conducting drills and exercises involving Extensive Damage Mitigation Guidelines (EDMGs) may or may not be used to meet the   "§ 50.54(hh)(2)
NEI 14-01, Emergency Response Procedures and Guidelines for Beyond Design Basis Events and Severe Accidents
" exercise requirement in 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Section IV.F.2.j , at the licensee's discretion.
* This document should not be endorsed as its contents are outside the scope of the rule.
NEI 14-01, "Emergency Response Procedures and Guidelines for Beyond Design Basis Events and Severe Accidents"  This document should not be endorsed as its contents are outside the scope of the rule.
2 See NEI 12-06 Revision 4, Sections 1.3 and 11.4 3
 
See NEI 12-06 Revision 4, Sections 11.4.3 and 11.6 Page 2 of 2}}
2 See NEI 12
-06 Revision 4, Sections 1.3 and 11.4 3 See NEI 12
-06 Revision 4, Sections 11.4.3 and 11.6}}

Latest revision as of 22:43, 19 October 2019

02-28-19_Summary of Recommended Changes to Regulatory Guides 1.226 and 1.228 to Support Issuance of Final Mitigation of Beyond Design Basis Events Rule
ML19079A281
Person / Time
Site: Nuclear Energy Institute
Issue date: 02/28/2019
From:
Nuclear Energy Institute
To: Holahan T
Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards
Theresa Clark 415-4140
References
Download: ML19079A281 (2)
v • d • e


Text

Summary of Recommended Changes to Regulatory Guides 1.226 and 1.228 to Support Issuance of Final Mitigation of Beyond Design Basis Events Rule NEI 06-12, B.5.b Phase 2 & 3 Submittal Guideline

  • This document should be endorsed in its entirety as an acceptable method to meet the requirements of 10 CFR 50.155(b)(2).

NEI 12-01, Guideline for Assessing Beyond Design Basis Accident Response Staffing and Communications Capabilities

  • The endorsement should make clear that the requirements of 10 CFR 50.155(f) do not apply to a change to communications equipment not directly related to implementation of mitigation strategies for beyond-design-basis external events (e.g., equipment used to make offsite notifications).
  • The following paragraph was struck from the rule statements of consideration; however, it was not directly related to rule compliance. Rather, it was included to address important operating experience from inspections conducted in accordance with Temporary Instruction (TI) 2515/191, Inspection of the Implementation of Mitigation Strategies and Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation Orders and Emergency Preparedness Communication/Staffing/Multi-Unit Dose Assessment Plans.

To maintain uniform understanding of offsite notification timing requirements going forward, wording similar to this paragraph should be included in the appropriate regulatory guide.

Therefore, any communication capability enhancement made by a licensee in response to the assessment did not need to meet the design capabilities for the communications system required by 10 CFR part 50, appendix E or testing frequencies described for primary and backup onsite and offsite communications systems. Any enhanced communications system, equipment, or power supply implemented as a result of the § 50.54(f) assessment was not necessary to meet the requirement to notify offsite emergency response organizations within 15 minutes of an emergency declaration or to meet the monthly communications testing requirement for contiguous State/local governments within the plume exposure pathway emergency planning zone.

NEI 12-06, Diverse and Flexible Coping Strategies (FLEX) Implementation Guide

  • Any references to severe accident management/severe accident management guidelines and NEI 14-01, Emergency Response Procedures and Guidelines for Beyond Design Basis Events and Severe Accidents, should not be endorsed. Further, the endorsement wording should indicate that severe accident management guidelines are developed and maintained in accordance with licensee commitments. 1 1

See NEI 12-06 Revision 4, Sections 1.3 and 11.4 Page 1 of 2

Summary of Recommended Changes to Regulatory Guides 1.226 and 1.228 to Support Issuance of Final Mitigation of Beyond Design Basis Events Rule

  • The endorsement wording should be clear that licensee use of the Systematic Approach to Training (SAT) process is not necessary to meet the requirement of 10 CFR 50.155(d); it may or may not be used. 2
  • The endorsement wording should be clear that licensee implementation of drills and exercises is not necessary to meet the requirement of 10 CFR 50.155(d); they may or may not be conducted. 3 NEI 13-06, Enhancements to Emergency Response Capabilities for Beyond Design Basis Events and Severe Accidents
  • Section 2, Multi-Unit Dose Assessment, should not be endorsed.
  • The endorsement wording should be clear that licensee use of the SAT process is not necessary to meet the requirement of 10 CFR 50.155(d); it may or may not be used.
  • There should be no endorsement of the training guidance related to qualifications.
  • There should be no endorsement of the training guidance related to the Ultimate Decision-Maker, nor its single reference in Appendix A.
  • Section 4, EP Facilities and Equipment, should not be endorsed.
  • The endorsement wording should be clear that licensee implementation of drills and exercises is not necessary to meet the requirement of 10 CFR 50.155(d); they may or may not be conducted.
  • The endorsement wording should state that the guidance for conducting drills and exercises involving Extensive Damage Mitigation Guidelines (EDMGs) may or may not be used to meet the

§ 50.54(hh)(2) exercise requirement in 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Section IV.F.2.j, at the licensees discretion.

NEI 14-01, Emergency Response Procedures and Guidelines for Beyond Design Basis Events and Severe Accidents

  • This document should not be endorsed as its contents are outside the scope of the rule.

2 See NEI 12-06 Revision 4, Sections 1.3 and 11.4 3

See NEI 12-06 Revision 4, Sections 11.4.3 and 11.6 Page 2 of 2

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML19079A281&oldid=1911835"