ML17340A854: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML17340A854
| number = ML17340A854
| issue date = 02/24/1981
| issue date = 02/24/1981
| title = Responds to NRC 810130 Ltr Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-250/80-36 & 50-251/80-34.Corrective Actions:Pipe Support Returned to Original Configuration & Insulation Reinstalled.No Proprietary Info
| title = Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-250/80-36 & 50-251/80-34.Corrective Actions:Pipe Support Returned to Original Configuration & Insulation Reinstalled.No Proprietary Info
| author name = UHRIG R E
| author name = Uhrig R
| author affiliation = FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
| author affiliation = FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
| addressee name = OREILLY J P
| addressee name = Oreilly J
| addressee affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
| addressee affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
| docket = 05000250, 05000251
| docket = 05000250, 05000251
Line 11: Line 11:
| contact person =  
| contact person =  
| document report number = L-81-63, NUDOCS 8103190294
| document report number = L-81-63, NUDOCS 8103190294
| title reference date = 01-30-1981
| package number = ML17340A853
| package number = ML17340A853
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC
| page count = 10
| page count = 10
}}
}}
See also: [[followed by::IR 05000250/1980036]]


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:il~~l,p-.3,-~~.;.
{{#Wiki_filter:il
.~';, fl,-.FLORIDA POWER 4 LIGHT COMPANY f.f:q gj'ebruary
~
24, 1981 L-81-63 Mr.James P.O'Reilly, Director, Region II Office of Inspection
~ l,p
and Enforcement
-.3,-~~.;.
U.S.Nuclear Regulatory
.~';, fl, -.
Commission
FLORIDA POWER 4 LIGHT COMPANY
101 Marietta Street, Sutie 3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Dear Mr.O'Reilly:
: f. f:qgj'ebruary 24, 1981 L-81-63 Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Director, Region II Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.
Re: Turkey Point Units 3&4 Docket Nos.50-250, 50-251 Ins ection Re ort Nos.80-36 and 80-34 Florida Power&Light Company has reviewed the subject inspection
S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 101 Marietta Street, Sutie 3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30303
reports and a response is attached.There is no proprietary
 
information
==Dear Mr.O'Reilly:==
in the report.Very truly yours, ViCe President" Advanced Systems'and
Re:
Technology" REU/PLP/ras
Turkey Point Units 3
Attachment
& 4 Docket Nos. 50-250, 50-251 Ins ection Re ort Nos.
cc: Harold F.Reis, Esquire PEOPLE..SERVING PEOPLE  
80-36 and 80-34 Florida Power
& Light Company has reviewed the subject inspection reports and a response is attached.
ATTACHMENT
There is no proprietary information in the report.
RE: Turkey Point Units 3 6 4 Docket Nos.50-250, 50-251 Ins ection Re ort Nos.80-36 and 80-34~F1nddn: Technical.
Very truly yours, ViCe President
Specification
" Advanced Systems'and Technology" REU/PLP/ras Attachment cc:
6.8.1 requires implementation
Harold F. Reis, Esquire PEOPLE..
of written procedures
SERVING PEOPLE
and administrative
 
policies that meet or exceed the requirements
ATTACHMENT RE:
and recommendations
Turkey Point Units 3
of Section 5.1 and 5.3 of ANSI 18.7-1972 and USNRC Regulatory
6 4
Guide 1.33.Procedure 0103.11 requires that following maintenance, safety related systems are restored to their normal condition.
Docket Nos. 50-250, 50-251 Ins ection Re ort Nos.
Contrary to the above, during facility tours of Units 3 and 4 this inspection
80-36 and 80-34
period, it was noted that maintenance
~F1nddn:
supervisors
Technical.
failed to implement existing procedures
Specification 6.8.1 requires implementation of written procedures and administrative policies that meet or exceed the requirements and recommendations of Section 5.1 and 5.3 of ANSI 18.7 1972 and USNRC Regulatory Guide 1.33.
to ensure complete restoration
Procedure 0103.11 requires that following maintenance, safety related systems are restored to their normal condition.
of safety related systems to normal operating condition following maintenance
Contrary to the above, during facility tours of Units 3 and 4 this inspection period, it was noted that maintenance supervisors failed to implement existing procedures to ensure complete restoration of safety related systems to normal operating condition following maintenance in that:
in that: The Mechanical
The Mechanical Supervisor on shift during the completion of maintenance on Unit 4
Supervisor
blender station failed to have the pipe support between manual isolation valve 4363 and flow control valve 4114A made up and the wooden wedges providing temporary support removed at conclusion of maintenance activity.
on shift during the completion
The Mechanical Supervisor on shift during the completion of maintenance on the Unit 3 Boron Injection Tank failed to have the insulation over the manway cover
of maintenance
~ properly replaced at the conclusion of the maintenance activity.
on Unit 4 blender station failed to have the pipe support between manual isolation valve 4363 and flow control valve 4114A made up and the wooden wedges providing temporary support removed at conclusion
4
of maintenance
~ *
activity.The Mechanical
, 3'.
Supervisor
Electrical Supervisors allowed the spray t'ight covers for all heat tracing
on shift during the completion
'hermostats.,to be left,off as a 'routine practice instead of properly positioned
of maintenance
. at'the conclusion of. maintenance activities.
on the Unit 3 Boron Injection Tank failed to have the insulation
I
over the manway cover~properly replaced at the conclusion
\\
of the maintenance
~Resense:',
activity.4~*, 3'.Electrical
(1-1)
Supervisors
FPL'oncurs with the'finding.
allowed the spray t'ight covers for all heat tracing'hermostats.,to
(1-2)
be left,off as a'routine practice instead of properly positioned
This particular pipe support was either -inadvertently omitted due to lack of follow-up or was still in the process of being repaired at the time this finding was noticed.
.at'the conclusion
This was found during the hanger and pipe support inspections and repairs pursuant to I and E Bulletin 79 02 which were in progress when Unit 4 was in cold shutdown condition for its annual overhaul/refueling.
of.maintenance
(1-3)
activities.
As corrective action, the pipe support in question was returned to its original configuration in December 1980.
I\~Res ense:', (1-1)FPL'oncurs
(1-4)
with the'finding.
As corrective action in order to avoid further problems, a procedure is being developed to control removal, reinstallation, and maintenance of hangers and pipe supports by plant maintenance forces in order to:
(1-2)This particular
a)
pipe support was either-inadvertently
Prevent recurrence of the same type of problem.,
omitted due to lack of follow-up or was still in the process of being repaired at the time this finding was noticed.This was found during the hanger and pipe support inspections
b)
and repairs pursuant to I and E Bulletin 79-79-02 which were in progress when Unit 4 was in cold shutdown condition for its annual overhaul/refueling.
~ Provide guidelines for returning hangers and/or'ipe.supports to their original configura'tion after their remov'al for maintenance s
(1-3)As corrective
 
action, the pipe support in question was returned to its original configuration
c)
in December 1980.(1-4)As corrective
Provide guidelines on the specifications for each type of bolt on each hangers (i.e.,
action in order to avoid further problems, a procedure is being developed to control removal, reinstallation, and maintenance
torqueing of bolts) 2.
of hangers and pipe supports by plant maintenance
(1-5), This procedure is now being formulated.
forces in order to: a)Prevent recurrence
It is being actively pursued and it is scheduled to be reviewed and approved by April 27, 1981.
of the same type of problem., b)~Provide guidelines
Full compliance will be achieved when't is approved.
for returning hangers and/or'ipe.supports to'their original configura'tion
(2-1)
after their remov'al for maintenance
FPL concurs with the finding.
s  
. (2-2)
(2-3)
c)Provide guidelines
The insulation on the Unit 3 Boron Injection Tank manway cover was not reinstalled after maintenance due to lack of follow-up.
on the specifications
As corrective action, the insulation on the manway cover in question was reinstalled prior to January 1981.
for each type of bolt on each hangers (i.e., torqueing of bolts)2.(1-5), This procedure is now being formulated.
(2-4)
It is being actively pursued and it is scheduled to be reviewed and approved by April 27, 1981.Full compliance
As 'corrective action to avoid further
will be achieved when't is approved.(2-1)FPL concurs with the finding..(2-2)(2-3)The insulation
: problems, we are taking the following steps:
on the Unit 3 Boron Injection Tank manway cover was not reinstalled
A specific crew will be designated to maintain each nuclear unit's primary systems.
after maintenance
The supervisor in charge of each crew will be responsible for compliance with applicable plant procedures (including AP 0103.11) and following up after'is crew completes each job.
due to lack of follow-up.
This responsibility will. be implemented by instructing personnel and dessiminating job descriptions.
As corrective
One of the two crews assigned to primary systems will be responsible for housekeeping.
action, the insulation
(2-5)
on the manway cover in question was reinstalled
Full compliance will be achieved no later than March 27, 1981.
prior to January 1981.(2-4)As'corrective
3.
action to avoid further problems, we are taking the following steps: A specific crew will be designated
(3-1)
to maintain each nuclear unit's primary systems.The supervisor
FPL concurs, with the finding.
in charge of each crew will be responsible
(3-2)
for compliance
The practice in the finding developed gradually following several
with applicable
'instances'f varying degrees of solidification in boric acid systems
plant procedures (including
~
AP 0103.11)and following up after'is crew completes each job.This responsibility
. requiring heat tracing.
will.be implemented
The Electrical Maintenance Department initiated
by instructing
: weekly checks'f'=each'eat
personnel and dessiminating
'tracing'irc'uit to.'verify.'proper circ'uit''
job descriptions.
operation.,
One of the two crews assigned to primary systems will be responsible
Many minor.adjustments and repairs were made as a result of these, checks.
for housekeeping.
, Most 'of these adjustments and repairs required access to the heat tracing thermostat boxes.
(2-5)Full compliance
The practice of not replacing the covers evolved due to the awareness that the cover being reinstalled would probably be removed again with a
will be achieved no later than March 27, 1981.3.(3-1)FPL concurs, with the finding.(3-2)The practice in the finding developed gradually following several'instances'f
week.
varying degrees of solidification
: Also, this practice allowed the shift operators to make minor thermostat adjustments.
in boric acid systems~.requiring heat tracing.The Electrical
to a
Maintenance
circuit during times when Electrical personnel were not available.
Department
0 (3-3)
initiated: weekly checks'f'=each'eat
In order to improve the reliability and performance of the heat tracing
'tracing'irc'uit
: circuits, the originally installed Chromalox type heat tracing circuits are being replaced with a much improved Chemelex type.
to.'verify.'proper
The replacement program is planned to continue until all heat tracing circuits are replaced.
circ'uit''
The new type of heat tracing has already proven to be more reliable and to require far less maintenance.
operation., Many minor.adjustments
Consequently, for the new circuits there is no need to'leave the covers off.
and repairs were made as a result of these, checks., Most'of these adjustments
 
and repairs required access to the heat tracing thermostat
r 0
boxes.The practice of not replacing the covers evolved due to the awareness that the cover being reinstalled
 
would probably be removed again with a week.Also, this practice allowed the shift operators to make minor thermostat
(3-4).Corrective action that will be taken; a)
adjustments.
Znstallation of covers which are now available.-
to a circuit during times when Electrical
b)
personnel were not available.
The installation of necessary replacement covers which have been ordered.
0 (3-3)In order to improve the reliability
c)
and performance
Meetings within the Electrical Department will be held to stress the importance of the re-installation of these qovers.
of the heat tracing circuits, the originally
d)
installed Chromalox type heat tracing circuits are being replaced with a much improved Chemelex type.The replacement
Preventive Maintenance Program plant work orders will be revised to include a specific step calling for installation of the covers following the work.
program is planned to continue until all heat tracing circuits are replaced.The new type of heat tracing has already proven to be more reliable and to require far less maintenance.
(3-5)
Consequently, for the new circuits there is no need to'leave the covers off.  
Full compliance is scheduled to be completed by May 15, 1981.
r0
 
(3-4).Corrective
)>
action that will be taken;a)Znstallation
a
of covers which are now available.-
~
b)The installation
STATE OF FLORIDA
of necessary replacement
)
covers which have been ordered.c)Meetings within the Electrical
)
Department
COlB'TY OF DADE
will be held to stress the importance
)
of the re-installation
ss
of these qovers.d)Preventive
~
Maintenance
heing irst duly sworn, deposes and says:
Program plant work orders will be revised to include a specific step calling for installation
That he is Executive Vice President 'fFlorida Power a
of the covers following the work.(3-5)Full compliance
Light Company, the licensee herein; That he has executed.
is scheduled to be completed by May 15, 1981.  
the foregoing document; that the state-ments made in this said document are true and correct to the best. of his knowledge, information, and bel'ef, and that he is authorized to execute the document.
on behalf of said, E. A. Adomat J
)>a~STATE OF FLORIDA))COlB'TY OF DADE)ss~heing irst duly sworn, deposes and says: That he is Executive Vice President'f Florida Power a Light Company, the licensee herein;That he has executed.the foregoing document;that the state-ments made in this said document are true and correct to the best.of his knowledge, information, and bel'ef, and that he is authorized
Subscribed and sworn'o h'efore me this ctay o+
to execute the document.on behalf of said, E.A.Adomat J Subscribed
z-. &AA.~~'-A~
and sworn'o h'efore me this ctay o+z-.&AA.~~'-A~
NOTARY ?UBLXC, S"ate of Florida and for the County of Dade, thtsry Pub:"ic, Steno Of Rari".s "t Lrgo Mv CcemM"n Exirea Oclober 30.
NOTARY?UBLXC, S"ate of Florida and for the County of Dade, thtsry Pub:"ic, Steno Of Rari".s"t Lrgo Mv CcemM"n Exirea Oclober 30.3KG3 My commission
3KG3 My commission exp'res:
exp'res:.".."-.".""'"rJ i','"vr."rd
.".."-."." " '"rJ i','"vr."rd 30ndivg Agency}}
30ndivg Agency
}}

Latest revision as of 12:42, 7 January 2025

Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-250/80-36 & 50-251/80-34.Corrective Actions:Pipe Support Returned to Original Configuration & Insulation Reinstalled.No Proprietary Info
ML17340A854
Person / Time
Site: Turkey Point  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 02/24/1981
From: Robert E. Uhrig
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To: James O'Reilly
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML17340A853 List:
References
L-81-63, NUDOCS 8103190294
Download: ML17340A854 (10)


Text

il

~

~ l,p

-.3,-~~.;.

.~';, fl, -.

FLORIDA POWER 4 LIGHT COMPANY

f. f:qgj'ebruary 24, 1981 L-81-63 Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Director, Region II Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.

S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 101 Marietta Street, Sutie 3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30303

Dear Mr.O'Reilly:

Re:

Turkey Point Units 3

& 4 Docket Nos. 50-250, 50-251 Ins ection Re ort Nos.

80-36 and 80-34 Florida Power

& Light Company has reviewed the subject inspection reports and a response is attached.

There is no proprietary information in the report.

Very truly yours, ViCe President

" Advanced Systems'and Technology" REU/PLP/ras Attachment cc:

Harold F. Reis, Esquire PEOPLE..

SERVING PEOPLE

ATTACHMENT RE:

Turkey Point Units 3

6 4

Docket Nos. 50-250, 50-251 Ins ection Re ort Nos.

80-36 and 80-34

~F1nddn:

Technical.

Specification 6.8.1 requires implementation of written procedures and administrative policies that meet or exceed the requirements and recommendations of Section 5.1 and 5.3 of ANSI 18.7 1972 and USNRC Regulatory Guide 1.33.

Procedure 0103.11 requires that following maintenance, safety related systems are restored to their normal condition.

Contrary to the above, during facility tours of Units 3 and 4 this inspection period, it was noted that maintenance supervisors failed to implement existing procedures to ensure complete restoration of safety related systems to normal operating condition following maintenance in that:

The Mechanical Supervisor on shift during the completion of maintenance on Unit 4

blender station failed to have the pipe support between manual isolation valve 4363 and flow control valve 4114A made up and the wooden wedges providing temporary support removed at conclusion of maintenance activity.

The Mechanical Supervisor on shift during the completion of maintenance on the Unit 3 Boron Injection Tank failed to have the insulation over the manway cover

~ properly replaced at the conclusion of the maintenance activity.

4

~ *

, 3'.

Electrical Supervisors allowed the spray t'ight covers for all heat tracing

'hermostats.,to be left,off as a 'routine practice instead of properly positioned

. at'the conclusion of. maintenance activities.

I

\\

~Resense:',

(1-1)

FPL'oncurs with the'finding.

(1-2)

This particular pipe support was either -inadvertently omitted due to lack of follow-up or was still in the process of being repaired at the time this finding was noticed.

This was found during the hanger and pipe support inspections and repairs pursuant to I and E Bulletin 79 02 which were in progress when Unit 4 was in cold shutdown condition for its annual overhaul/refueling.

(1-3)

As corrective action, the pipe support in question was returned to its original configuration in December 1980.

(1-4)

As corrective action in order to avoid further problems, a procedure is being developed to control removal, reinstallation, and maintenance of hangers and pipe supports by plant maintenance forces in order to:

a)

Prevent recurrence of the same type of problem.,

b)

~ Provide guidelines for returning hangers and/or'ipe.supports to their original configura'tion after their remov'al for maintenance s

c)

Provide guidelines on the specifications for each type of bolt on each hangers (i.e.,

torqueing of bolts) 2.

(1-5), This procedure is now being formulated.

It is being actively pursued and it is scheduled to be reviewed and approved by April 27, 1981.

Full compliance will be achieved when't is approved.

(2-1)

FPL concurs with the finding.

. (2-2)

(2-3)

The insulation on the Unit 3 Boron Injection Tank manway cover was not reinstalled after maintenance due to lack of follow-up.

As corrective action, the insulation on the manway cover in question was reinstalled prior to January 1981.

(2-4)

As 'corrective action to avoid further

problems, we are taking the following steps:

A specific crew will be designated to maintain each nuclear unit's primary systems.

The supervisor in charge of each crew will be responsible for compliance with applicable plant procedures (including AP 0103.11) and following up after'is crew completes each job.

This responsibility will. be implemented by instructing personnel and dessiminating job descriptions.

One of the two crews assigned to primary systems will be responsible for housekeeping.

(2-5)

Full compliance will be achieved no later than March 27, 1981.

3.

(3-1)

FPL concurs, with the finding.

(3-2)

The practice in the finding developed gradually following several

'instances'f varying degrees of solidification in boric acid systems

~

. requiring heat tracing.

The Electrical Maintenance Department initiated

weekly checks'f'=each'eat

'tracing'irc'uit to.'verify.'proper circ'uit

operation.,

Many minor.adjustments and repairs were made as a result of these, checks.

, Most 'of these adjustments and repairs required access to the heat tracing thermostat boxes.

The practice of not replacing the covers evolved due to the awareness that the cover being reinstalled would probably be removed again with a

week.

Also, this practice allowed the shift operators to make minor thermostat adjustments.

to a

circuit during times when Electrical personnel were not available.

0 (3-3)

In order to improve the reliability and performance of the heat tracing

circuits, the originally installed Chromalox type heat tracing circuits are being replaced with a much improved Chemelex type.

The replacement program is planned to continue until all heat tracing circuits are replaced.

The new type of heat tracing has already proven to be more reliable and to require far less maintenance.

Consequently, for the new circuits there is no need to'leave the covers off.

r 0

(3-4).Corrective action that will be taken; a)

Znstallation of covers which are now available.-

b)

The installation of necessary replacement covers which have been ordered.

c)

Meetings within the Electrical Department will be held to stress the importance of the re-installation of these qovers.

d)

Preventive Maintenance Program plant work orders will be revised to include a specific step calling for installation of the covers following the work.

(3-5)

Full compliance is scheduled to be completed by May 15, 1981.

)>

a

~

STATE OF FLORIDA

)

)

COlB'TY OF DADE

)

ss

~

heing irst duly sworn, deposes and says:

That he is Executive Vice President 'fFlorida Power a

Light Company, the licensee herein; That he has executed.

the foregoing document; that the state-ments made in this said document are true and correct to the best. of his knowledge, information, and bel'ef, and that he is authorized to execute the document.

on behalf of said, E. A. Adomat J

Subscribed and sworn'o h'efore me this ctay o+

z-. &AA.~~'-A~

NOTARY ?UBLXC, S"ate of Florida and for the County of Dade, thtsry Pub:"ic, Steno Of Rari".s "t Lrgo Mv CcemM"n Exirea Oclober 30.

3KG3 My commission exp'res:

.".."-."." " '"rJ i','"vr."rd 30ndivg Agency