ML12188A745: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 14: Line 14:
| page count = 8
| page count = 8
}}
}}
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:July 6, 2012 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD
In the Matter of    )
      )
ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.  ) Docket Nos. 50-247-LR/286-LR
      )
(Indian Point Nuclear Generating    )
Units 2 and 3)    )
NRC STAFF'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME  FOR THE FILING OF TESTIMONY, EXHIBITS AND STATEMENTS OF POSITION ON CONTENTION NYS-38/RK-TC-5 Pursuant to 10 C.F.R. § 2.323(c), the NRC Staff ("Staff") hereby requests an extension of time until August 20, 2012, for the filing of testimony, exhibits and statements of position on
Contention NYS-38/RK-TC-5 in this proceeding by the Staff. As discussed below, the Staff has
discussed this motion with Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. ("Entergy" or "Applicant"), the State
of New York ("New York") and Riverkeeper, Inc. ("Riverkeeper") (collectively, "Intervenors");
none of those parties oppose the Staff's motion. In support of this Motion, the Staff states as
follows: 1. In accordance with the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board's ("Board") previous Scheduling Orders in this proceeding, New York and Riverkeeper filed their direct testimony, exhibits and statements of position for Contention NYS-38/RK-TC-5 on June 19 and 20, 2012. 2. As stated in the Board's "Order (Denying NRC Staff's Motion for Partial Reconsideration and State of New York/Riverkeeper's Cross-Motion to NRC Staff's Motion for
Reconsideration)" ("Scheduling Order") of April 23, 2012, the Staff and Entergy are required to
file their testimony, exhibits, and statements of position in filings that set out both their direct and
rebuttal cases.
Id. at 7. Under the current schedule, the Staff's and Applicant's testimony, exhibits and statements of position on NYS-38/RK-TC-5 are now due to be filed on or before
July 19, 2012.
See Order of May 16, 2012, at 1. Based on the current schedule, New York's and Riverkeeper's rebuttal testimony, statements of position, and exhibits are due ten days later, on July 30, 2012. Scheduling Order at 7. 3. The Intervenors' testimony, exhibits, and statements of position on NYS-38/RK-TC-5, filed on June 19 and 20, 2012, address a multitude of issues related to the 3 parts of their
contention including: the steam generator divider plate, metal fatigue, and WESTEMS TM. Specifically, the Intervenors' filings consist of 872 pages including the statement of position, pre-
filed testimony, and exhibits. The breadth and volu me of the Intervenors' testimony, exhibits and statements of position have caused the Staff to conclude that it will require an extension of
time to enable it to complete its review of the Intervenor's filings and file its direct and rebuttal
testimony, exhibits, and statements of position on this contention. 4. In addition, the Staff is engaged in an intensive and time-consuming review of the numerous and extensive evidentiary submissions that the Intervenors filed in the past ten days.
Specifically, on June 28, 2012, the Intervenors f iled rebuttal testimony on Contentions NYS-5 (buried piping and tanks), NYS-6/7 (low and medium voltage cables), and Clearwater-EC3A (environmental justice). On June 29, 2012, the Intervenors completed their rebuttal filings on
NYS-8 (transformers), NYS-17B (property va lues), NYS-37 (no action alternative), and Riverkeeper-TC2 (flow accelerated corrosion). On July 2, 2012, the Intervenors completed
additional rebuttal filings on NYS-12C (SAMA decontamination and cleanup costs), NYS-16B (SAMA population estimates), and NYS-26B/ Riverkeeper-TC1B (metal fatigue). The Staff's
witnesses for NYS-38/RK-TC-5, NYS-26B/ Riverkeeper-TC1B, and Riverkeeper-TC2
substantially overlap. The Staff's witnesses' ability to prepare testimony responsive to the Intervenors' initial filings on Contention NYS-38/RK-TC-5, while simultaneously reviewing their
rebuttal testimony on Contentions NYS-26B/ Riverkeeper-TC1B, NYS-26B/ Riverkeeper-TC1B, and Riverkeeper-TC2 for motions in limine, is limited, and precludes them from being able to address all of these matters simultaneously. 
: 5. In addition, some of the Staff's witnesses assigned to this contention were severely impacted by the recent thunderstorm that resulted in substantial power outages
throughout the Washington, D.C., metro region. One witness lost both power and water to his
home for five days, limiting his ability to work on this matter. 6. In view of the breadth and volume of the Intervenors' filings, which the Staff is required to address in its rebuttal testimony - as well as the need to review Intervenor's rebuttal
testimony and prepare any necessary motions in limine , and the severe disruptions to power and water from the recent storm, the Staff has determined that it requires a 30-day extension of
time, until August 20, 2012, for the filing of its testimony, exhibits, and statements of position on
Contention NYS-38/RK-TC-5. 7. In accordance with 10 C.F.R. § 2.323(b), Staff Counsel has contacted Counsel for New York, Riverkeeper, Clearwater, and Entergy.
Counsel for Entergy stated that Entergy does not object to the Staff's requested extension and requests that, for the sake of efficiency
and uniformity, a single date be established for the filing of both the Staff's and Entergy's
testimony, exhibits, and statements of position on NYS-38/RK-TC-5; the Staff does not oppose
that request. Counsel for New York and Riverkeeper stated that they do not oppose the Staff's
request and are amenable to a common date being established for both the Staff's and
Applicant's filings. Counsel for Clearwater did not participate in the consultation. 8. The Staff is aware that this proceeding commenced more than four years ago, and that the Board has expressed interest in progressing to hearing without unnecessary delay
(e.g., Tr. 1096-97). The Staff respectfully submits, however, that the instant request for an extension of time is not unreasonable under the circumstances, and will not cause hardship for
any party or substantial delay in the proceeding.
This extension of time would not affect the hearing on Track 1 contentions (scheduled to commence on October 15, 2012), which do not
include NYS-38/RK-TC-5.
WHEREFORE, the Staff respectfully requests that the Staff and Applicant be afforded an extension of time, until August 20, 2012, in which to file their written testimony, exhibits, and
statements of position in this proceeding.
Signed Electronically by Brian G. Harris Counsel for NRC Staff
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Office of the General Counsel
Mail Stop - O-15D21
Washington, DC  20555
Telephone:  (301) 415-1392
E-mail: brian.harris@nrc.gov
Dated at Rockville, Maryland
this 6th day of July 2012
CERTIFICATION OF COUNSEL
Pursuant to 10 C.F.R. § 2.323(b), the undersigned attorney hereby certifies that he has made a sincere effort to contact the other parties to this proceeding (Entergy, New York, Clearwater, and Riverkeeper), to resolve the issues raised in this Motion, and that his efforts to
resolve this issue have been successful. Clearwater took no part in these discussions.
Respectfully submitted,
Signed Electronically by Brian G. Harris Counsel for NRC Staff
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Office of the General Counsel
Mail Stop - O-15D21
Washington, DC  20555
Telephone:  (301) 415-1392
E-mail: brian.harris@nrc.gov
Dated at Rockville, Maryland
this 6th day of July 2012 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD
In the Matter of    )
      )
ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC. )  Docket Nos. 50-247/286-LR ) (Indian Point Nuclear Generating  ) Units 2 and 3)    )
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing "NRC STAFF'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR THE FILING OF TESTIMONY, EXHIBITS AND STATEMENTS OF
POSITION ON CONTENTION NYS-38/RK-TC-5," dated July 6, 2012, in the above-captioned
proceeding have been served on the following by Electronic Information Exchange this 6 th day of July, 2012.
Lawrence G. McDade, Chair
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
Mail Stop - T-3 F23
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Washington, D.C. 20555-0001
E-mail: Lawrence.McDade@nrc.gov Office of Commission Appellate Adjudication
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Mail Stop: O-16G4
Washington, DC 20555-0001
E-mail: OCAAMAIL.resource@nrc.gov Dr. Richard E. Wardwell
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
Mail Stop - T-3 F23
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Washington, D.C. 20555-0001
E-mail: Richard.Wardwell@nrc.gov Office of the Secretary Attn: Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff
Mail Stop: O-16G4
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Washington, DC 20555-0001
E-mail: Hearing.Docket@nrc.gov Dr. Michael F. Kennedy
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
Mail Stop T-3 F23
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Washington, DC 20555-0001
E-mail: Michael.Kennedy@nrc.gov Josh Kirstein, Esq.
Anne Siarnacki, Esq. 
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
Mail Stop - T-3  F23
U. S, Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Washington, D.C. 20555-0001
E-mail: Josh.Kirstein@nrc.gov E-mail: Anne.Siarnacki@nrc.gov
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Mail Stop: T-3 F23
Washington, DC 20555-0001
Melissa-Jean Rotini, Esq.
Assistant County Attorney 
Office of Robert F. Meehan, Esq.
Westchester County Attorney 
148 Martine Avenue, 6th Floor 
White Plains, NY 10601
E-mail: MJR1@westchestergov.com Kathryn M. Sutton, Esq.
Paul M. Bessette, Esq.
Jonathan Rund, Esq.
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP
1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20004
E-mail: ksutton@morganlewis.com E-mail: pbessette@morganlewis.com E-mail: jrund@morganlewis.com John J. Sipos, Esq.
Charlie Donaldson, Esq.
Assistants Attorney General
New York State Department of Law
Environmental Protection Bureau
The Capitol
Albany, NY 12224
E-mail: John.Sipos@ag.ny.gov Martin J. O'Neill, Esq.
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP
1000 Louisiana Street, Suite 4000 Houston, TX  77002 E-mail: martin.o'neill@morganlewis.com
Elise N. Zoli, Esq.
Goodwin Procter, LLP
Exchange Place
53 State Street 
Boston, MA 02109
E-mail: ezoli@goodwinprocter.com
Janice A. Dean, Esq.
Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General 
of the State of New York
120 Broadway, 25 th Floor New York, NY  10271
E-mail:  Janice.Dean@ag.ny.gov
Joan Leary Matthews, Esq.
Senior Attorney for Special Projects
New York State Department of
Environmental Conservation
Office of the General Counsel
625 Broadway, 14 th Floor Albany, NY 12233-1500
E-mail: jlmatthe@gw.dec.state.ny.us William C. Dennis, Esq.
Assistant General Counsel
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
440 Hamilton Avenue
White Plains, NY 10601
E-mail: wdennis@entergy.com John Louis Parker, Esq.
Office of General Counsel, Region 3
New York State Department of
Environmental Conservation
21 South Putt Corners Road
New Paltz, NY  12561-1620
E-mail:  jlparker@gw.dec.state.ny.us Daniel E. O'Neill, Mayor James Seirmarco, M.S.
Village of Buchanan
Municipal Building
Buchanan, NY 10511-1298 E-mail: vob@bestweb.net E-mail: smurray@villageofbuchanan.com Manna Jo Greene Karla Raimundi
Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, Inc.
724 Wolcott Avenue
Beacon, NY 12508
E-mail: mannajo@clearwater.org E-mail: karla@clearwater.org
Robert Snook, Esq.
Office of the Attorney General
State of Connecticut
55 Elm Street
P.O. Box 120
Hartford, CT  06141-0120
E-mail: robert.snook@ct.gov Daniel Riesel, Esq.
Thomas F. Wood, Esq.
Victoria Shiah, Esq.
Sive, Paget & Riesel, P.C.
460 Park Avenue
New York, NY  10022 E-mail:  driesel@sprlaw.com E-mail: vshiah@sprlaw.com Phillip Musegaas, Esq.
Deborah Brancato, Esq.
Riverkeeper, Inc.
20 Secor Road
Ossining, NY  10562
E-mail: phillip@riverkeeper.org E-mail: dbrancato@riverkeeper.org Michael J. Delaney, Esq.
Director, Energy Regulatory Affairs
New York City Department of Environmental
Protection
59-17 Junction Boulevard
Flushing, NY 11373 
E-mail: mdelaney@dep.nyc.gov
Signed Electronically by Brian G. Harris Counsel for NRC Staff
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Office of the General Counsel
Mail Stop - O-15D21
Washington, DC  20555
Telephone:  (301) 415-1392
E-mail: brian.harris@nrc.gov}}

Revision as of 00:14, 2 August 2018

NRC Staff'S Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time for the Filing of Tetsimony, Exhibts and Statements of Position on Contention NYS-38/RK-TC-5
ML12188A745
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 07/06/2012
From: Harris B G
NRC/OGC
To:
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
SECY RAS
References
RAS 22926, 50-247-LR, 50-286-LR, ASLBP 07-858-03-LR-BD01, NYS-38/RK-TC-5
Download: ML12188A745 (8)
v • d • e


Text

July 6, 2012 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD

In the Matter of )

)

ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC. ) Docket Nos. 50-247-LR/286-LR

)

(Indian Point Nuclear Generating )

Units 2 and 3) )

NRC STAFF'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR THE FILING OF TESTIMONY, EXHIBITS AND STATEMENTS OF POSITION ON CONTENTION NYS-38/RK-TC-5 Pursuant to 10 C.F.R. § 2.323(c), the NRC Staff ("Staff") hereby requests an extension of time until August 20, 2012, for the filing of testimony, exhibits and statements of position on

Contention NYS-38/RK-TC-5 in this proceeding by the Staff. As discussed below, the Staff has

discussed this motion with Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. ("Entergy" or "Applicant"), the State

of New York ("New York") and Riverkeeper, Inc. ("Riverkeeper") (collectively, "Intervenors");

none of those parties oppose the Staff's motion. In support of this Motion, the Staff states as

follows: 1. In accordance with the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board's ("Board") previous Scheduling Orders in this proceeding, New York and Riverkeeper filed their direct testimony, exhibits and statements of position for Contention NYS-38/RK-TC-5 on June 19 and 20, 2012. 2. As stated in the Board's "Order (Denying NRC Staff's Motion for Partial Reconsideration and State of New York/Riverkeeper's Cross-Motion to NRC Staff's Motion for

Reconsideration)" ("Scheduling Order") of April 23, 2012, the Staff and Entergy are required to

file their testimony, exhibits, and statements of position in filings that set out both their direct and

rebuttal cases.

Id. at 7. Under the current schedule, the Staff's and Applicant's testimony, exhibits and statements of position on NYS-38/RK-TC-5 are now due to be filed on or before

July 19, 2012.

See Order of May 16, 2012, at 1. Based on the current schedule, New York's and Riverkeeper's rebuttal testimony, statements of position, and exhibits are due ten days later, on July 30, 2012. Scheduling Order at 7. 3. The Intervenors' testimony, exhibits, and statements of position on NYS-38/RK-TC-5, filed on June 19 and 20, 2012, address a multitude of issues related to the 3 parts of their

contention including: the steam generator divider plate, metal fatigue, and WESTEMS TM. Specifically, the Intervenors' filings consist of 872 pages including the statement of position, pre-

filed testimony, and exhibits. The breadth and volu me of the Intervenors' testimony, exhibits and statements of position have caused the Staff to conclude that it will require an extension of

time to enable it to complete its review of the Intervenor's filings and file its direct and rebuttal

testimony, exhibits, and statements of position on this contention. 4. In addition, the Staff is engaged in an intensive and time-consuming review of the numerous and extensive evidentiary submissions that the Intervenors filed in the past ten days.

Specifically, on June 28, 2012, the Intervenors f iled rebuttal testimony on Contentions NYS-5 (buried piping and tanks), NYS-6/7 (low and medium voltage cables), and Clearwater-EC3A (environmental justice). On June 29, 2012, the Intervenors completed their rebuttal filings on

NYS-8 (transformers), NYS-17B (property va lues), NYS-37 (no action alternative), and Riverkeeper-TC2 (flow accelerated corrosion). On July 2, 2012, the Intervenors completed

additional rebuttal filings on NYS-12C (SAMA decontamination and cleanup costs), NYS-16B (SAMA population estimates), and NYS-26B/ Riverkeeper-TC1B (metal fatigue). The Staff's

witnesses for NYS-38/RK-TC-5, NYS-26B/ Riverkeeper-TC1B, and Riverkeeper-TC2

substantially overlap. The Staff's witnesses' ability to prepare testimony responsive to the Intervenors' initial filings on Contention NYS-38/RK-TC-5, while simultaneously reviewing their

rebuttal testimony on Contentions NYS-26B/ Riverkeeper-TC1B, NYS-26B/ Riverkeeper-TC1B, and Riverkeeper-TC2 for motions in limine, is limited, and precludes them from being able to address all of these matters simultaneously.

5. In addition, some of the Staff's witnesses assigned to this contention were severely impacted by the recent thunderstorm that resulted in substantial power outages

throughout the Washington, D.C., metro region. One witness lost both power and water to his

home for five days, limiting his ability to work on this matter. 6. In view of the breadth and volume of the Intervenors' filings, which the Staff is required to address in its rebuttal testimony - as well as the need to review Intervenor's rebuttal

testimony and prepare any necessary motions in limine , and the severe disruptions to power and water from the recent storm, the Staff has determined that it requires a 30-day extension of

time, until August 20, 2012, for the filing of its testimony, exhibits, and statements of position on

Contention NYS-38/RK-TC-5. 7. In accordance with 10 C.F.R. § 2.323(b), Staff Counsel has contacted Counsel for New York, Riverkeeper, Clearwater, and Entergy.

Counsel for Entergy stated that Entergy does not object to the Staff's requested extension and requests that, for the sake of efficiency

and uniformity, a single date be established for the filing of both the Staff's and Entergy's

testimony, exhibits, and statements of position on NYS-38/RK-TC-5; the Staff does not oppose

that request. Counsel for New York and Riverkeeper stated that they do not oppose the Staff's

request and are amenable to a common date being established for both the Staff's and

Applicant's filings. Counsel for Clearwater did not participate in the consultation. 8. The Staff is aware that this proceeding commenced more than four years ago, and that the Board has expressed interest in progressing to hearing without unnecessary delay

(e.g., Tr. 1096-97). The Staff respectfully submits, however, that the instant request for an extension of time is not unreasonable under the circumstances, and will not cause hardship for

any party or substantial delay in the proceeding.

This extension of time would not affect the hearing on Track 1 contentions (scheduled to commence on October 15, 2012), which do not

include NYS-38/RK-TC-5.

WHEREFORE, the Staff respectfully requests that the Staff and Applicant be afforded an extension of time, until August 20, 2012, in which to file their written testimony, exhibits, and

statements of position in this proceeding.

Signed Electronically by Brian G. Harris Counsel for NRC Staff

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of the General Counsel

Mail Stop - O-15D21

Washington, DC 20555

Telephone: (301) 415-1392

E-mail: brian.harris@nrc.gov

Dated at Rockville, Maryland

this 6th day of July 2012

CERTIFICATION OF COUNSEL

Pursuant to 10 C.F.R. § 2.323(b), the undersigned attorney hereby certifies that he has made a sincere effort to contact the other parties to this proceeding (Entergy, New York, Clearwater, and Riverkeeper), to resolve the issues raised in this Motion, and that his efforts to

resolve this issue have been successful. Clearwater took no part in these discussions.

Respectfully submitted,

Signed Electronically by Brian G. Harris Counsel for NRC Staff

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of the General Counsel

Mail Stop - O-15D21

Washington, DC 20555

Telephone: (301) 415-1392

E-mail: brian.harris@nrc.gov

Dated at Rockville, Maryland

this 6th day of July 2012 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD

In the Matter of )

)

ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC. ) Docket Nos. 50-247/286-LR ) (Indian Point Nuclear Generating ) Units 2 and 3) )

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing "NRC STAFF'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR THE FILING OF TESTIMONY, EXHIBITS AND STATEMENTS OF

POSITION ON CONTENTION NYS-38/RK-TC-5," dated July 6, 2012, in the above-captioned

proceeding have been served on the following by Electronic Information Exchange this 6 th day of July, 2012.

Lawrence G. McDade, Chair

Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel

Mail Stop - T-3 F23

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: Lawrence.McDade@nrc.gov Office of Commission Appellate Adjudication

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Mail Stop: O-16G4

Washington, DC 20555-0001

E-mail: OCAAMAIL.resource@nrc.gov Dr. Richard E. Wardwell

Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel

Mail Stop - T-3 F23

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: Richard.Wardwell@nrc.gov Office of the Secretary Attn: Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff

Mail Stop: O-16G4

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Washington, DC 20555-0001

E-mail: Hearing.Docket@nrc.gov Dr. Michael F. Kennedy

Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel

Mail Stop T-3 F23

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Washington, DC 20555-0001

E-mail: Michael.Kennedy@nrc.gov Josh Kirstein, Esq.

Anne Siarnacki, Esq.

Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel

Mail Stop - T-3 F23

U. S, Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: Josh.Kirstein@nrc.gov E-mail: Anne.Siarnacki@nrc.gov

Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Mail Stop: T-3 F23

Washington, DC 20555-0001

Melissa-Jean Rotini, Esq.

Assistant County Attorney

Office of Robert F. Meehan, Esq.

Westchester County Attorney

148 Martine Avenue, 6th Floor

White Plains, NY 10601

E-mail: MJR1@westchestergov.com Kathryn M. Sutton, Esq.

Paul M. Bessette, Esq.

Jonathan Rund, Esq.

Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP

1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, D.C. 20004

E-mail: ksutton@morganlewis.com E-mail: pbessette@morganlewis.com E-mail: jrund@morganlewis.com John J. Sipos, Esq.

Charlie Donaldson, Esq.

Assistants Attorney General

New York State Department of Law

Environmental Protection Bureau

The Capitol

Albany, NY 12224

E-mail: John.Sipos@ag.ny.gov Martin J. O'Neill, Esq.

Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP

1000 Louisiana Street, Suite 4000 Houston, TX 77002 E-mail: martin.o'neill@morganlewis.com

Elise N. Zoli, Esq.

Goodwin Procter, LLP

Exchange Place

53 State Street

Boston, MA 02109

E-mail: ezoli@goodwinprocter.com

Janice A. Dean, Esq.

Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General

of the State of New York

120 Broadway, 25 th Floor New York, NY 10271

E-mail: Janice.Dean@ag.ny.gov

Joan Leary Matthews, Esq.

Senior Attorney for Special Projects

New York State Department of

Environmental Conservation

Office of the General Counsel

625 Broadway, 14 th Floor Albany, NY 12233-1500

E-mail: jlmatthe@gw.dec.state.ny.us William C. Dennis, Esq.

Assistant General Counsel

Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

440 Hamilton Avenue

White Plains, NY 10601

E-mail: wdennis@entergy.com John Louis Parker, Esq.

Office of General Counsel, Region 3

New York State Department of

Environmental Conservation

21 South Putt Corners Road

New Paltz, NY 12561-1620

E-mail: jlparker@gw.dec.state.ny.us Daniel E. O'Neill, Mayor James Seirmarco, M.S.

Village of Buchanan

Municipal Building

Buchanan, NY 10511-1298 E-mail: vob@bestweb.net E-mail: smurray@villageofbuchanan.com Manna Jo Greene Karla Raimundi

Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, Inc.

724 Wolcott Avenue

Beacon, NY 12508

E-mail: mannajo@clearwater.org E-mail: karla@clearwater.org

Robert Snook, Esq.

Office of the Attorney General

State of Connecticut

55 Elm Street

P.O. Box 120

Hartford, CT 06141-0120

E-mail: robert.snook@ct.gov Daniel Riesel, Esq.

Thomas F. Wood, Esq.

Victoria Shiah, Esq.

Sive, Paget & Riesel, P.C.

460 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10022 E-mail: driesel@sprlaw.com E-mail: vshiah@sprlaw.com Phillip Musegaas, Esq.

Deborah Brancato, Esq.

Riverkeeper, Inc.

20 Secor Road

Ossining, NY 10562

E-mail: phillip@riverkeeper.org E-mail: dbrancato@riverkeeper.org Michael J. Delaney, Esq.

Director, Energy Regulatory Affairs

New York City Department of Environmental

Protection

59-17 Junction Boulevard

Flushing, NY 11373

E-mail: mdelaney@dep.nyc.gov

Signed Electronically by Brian G. Harris Counsel for NRC Staff

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of the General Counsel

Mail Stop - O-15D21

Washington, DC 20555

Telephone: (301) 415-1392

E-mail: brian.harris@nrc.gov

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML12188A745&oldid=934159"