ML13357A294: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 15: Line 15:
| page count = 53
| page count = 53
}}
}}
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:STATE OF NEW YORK OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL  ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN
DIVISION OF SOCIAL JUSTICE ATTORNEY GENERAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION BUREAU THE  CAPITOL, ALBANY, N.Y. 12224-0341 PHONE (518) 473-3105  FAX (518) 473- 2534  WWW.AG.NY.GOV December 23, 2013 Lawrence G. McDade, Chair Richard E. Wardwell
Michael F. Kennedy Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop - T-3 F23
Two White Flint North
11545 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738 Re: Indian Point Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 2 and Unit 3 Docket Nos. 50-247-LR/50-286-LR; ASLBP No. 07-858-03-LR-BD01
==Dear Administrative Judges:==
From time to time, Entergy has informed the Atomic Safety Licensing Board about Entergy's position concerning certain coastal zone management issues. 
The State provides the Board and the parties with copies of two recent decisions by the New York State Supreme Court for Albany County wherein the court denied two petitions that Entergy filed pursuant to New York State Civil Practice Law and Rules Article 78 against the New York State Department of State concerning coastal zone issues. The two rulings are:
: 1. Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 2, LLC, et al. v. New York State Department of State, et al., Index No. 5450-12 (Albany County), Decision Order and Judgment dated November 20, 2012;
: 2. Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., et al v. New York State Department of State, et al, Index No. 1535-13 (Albany County), Decision Order and Judgment dated December 13, 2013.
Respectfully submitted,
Signed (electronically) by John J. Sipos Assistant Attorney General cc: All individuals, parties, or NRC offices on the Service List Decision and Order/Judgment w ith Notice of Entry November 20, 2013 In the Matter of the Application of Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 2, LLC, and Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 3, LLC v. New York State Department of State, et al.
Supreme Court, Albany County Index No. 5450
-12 RJI No. 01 ST4009 (Justice Michael C. Lynch, Presiding)
Decision and Order/Judgment w ith Notice of Entry December 13, 2013 In the Matter of the Application of Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., et al.
: v. New York State Department of State, et al.
Supreme Court, Albany County Index No.
1535-13 RJI No. 01 ST4421 (Justice Michael C. Lynch, Presiding)}}

Revision as of 10:04, 3 July 2018

NYS Letter Re Coastal Zone Rulings and Attachments
ML13357A294
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 12/23/2013
From: Sipos J J
State of NY, Office of the Attorney General
To: Kennedy M F, McDade L G, Wardwell R E
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
SECY RAS
Shared Package
ML13357A290 List:
References
50-247-LR, 50-286-LR, ASLBP 07-858-03-LR-BD01, RAS 25433
Download: ML13357A294 (53)


Text

STATE OF NEW YORK OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN

DIVISION OF SOCIAL JUSTICE ATTORNEY GENERAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION BUREAU THE CAPITOL, ALBANY, N.Y. 12224-0341 PHONE (518) 473-3105 FAX (518) 473- 2534 WWW.AG.NY.GOV December 23, 2013 Lawrence G. McDade, Chair Richard E. Wardwell

Michael F. Kennedy Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop - T-3 F23

Two White Flint North

11545 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738 Re: Indian Point Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 2 and Unit 3 Docket Nos. 50-247-LR/50-286-LR; ASLBP No. 07-858-03-LR-BD01

Dear Administrative Judges:

From time to time, Entergy has informed the Atomic Safety Licensing Board about Entergy's position concerning certain coastal zone management issues.

The State provides the Board and the parties with copies of two recent decisions by the New York State Supreme Court for Albany County wherein the court denied two petitions that Entergy filed pursuant to New York State Civil Practice Law and Rules Article 78 against the New York State Department of State concerning coastal zone issues. The two rulings are:

1. Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 2, LLC, et al. v. New York State Department of State, et al., Index No. 5450-12 (Albany County), Decision Order and Judgment dated November 20, 2012;
2. Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., et al v. New York State Department of State, et al, Index No. 1535-13 (Albany County), Decision Order and Judgment dated December 13, 2013.

Respectfully submitted,

Signed (electronically) by John J. Sipos Assistant Attorney General cc: All individuals, parties, or NRC offices on the Service List Decision and Order/Judgment w ith Notice of Entry November 20, 2013 In the Matter of the Application of Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 2, LLC, and Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 3, LLC v. New York State Department of State, et al.

Supreme Court, Albany County Index No. 5450

-12 RJI No. 01 ST4009 (Justice Michael C. Lynch, Presiding)

Decision and Order/Judgment w ith Notice of Entry December 13, 2013 In the Matter of the Application of Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., et al.

v. New York State Department of State, et al.

Supreme Court, Albany County Index No.

1535-13 RJI No. 01 ST4421 (Justice Michael C. Lynch, Presiding)