ML16349A147

Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 2 - Acceptance for Review - Request to Change the Completion Date of Cyber Security Plan Implementation Milestone 8 (CAC No. MF8846)

ML16349A147
Person / Time
Site:	Watts Bar
Issue date:	12/09/2016
From:	Schaaf R G Plant Licensing Branch II
To:	Gordon A D, Russell D Tennessee Valley Authority
Schaaf R G, 415-6020
References
CAC MF8846
Download: ML16349A147 (2)

Text

From:Schaaf, Robert To:Gordon Arent

Wells, Russell Douglas Cc

Saba, Farideh

Nadel, Jared

"Edmondson, Carla"

Dion, Jeanne

Subject:

Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Unit 2 - Acceptance for Review - Request to Change the Completion Date of Cyber Security Plan Implementation Milestone 8 (CAC No. MF8846)

Date:Friday, December 09, 2016 1:29:52 PM Gentlemen, By letter dated November 14, 2016 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML16320A161),

the Tennessee Valley Authority

submitted an amendment request for Watts Bar Nuclear Plant (WBN), Unit 2. Theproposed amendment would revise the WBN Unit 2 Cyber Security Plan (CSP)Implementation Schedule for Milestone 8 and update the Facility Operating License.

The purpose of this e-mail is to provide you with the results of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this submittal.

The acceptance review wasperformed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review isalso intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. The NRC staff has reviewed your submittal and concluded that it does provide technical

information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposedamendment in terms of regulatory requirements and protection of public health and safety and the environment.

Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review ascompared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues thatimpact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified

despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any furtherinformation needed to support the NRC staff's detailed technical review by separatecorrespondence.

Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 80 hours3.333 days <br />0.476 weeks <br />0.11 months <br /> to complete.

The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately 3 months, which is March2017. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that wouldcause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will becommunicated during routine interactions with the assigned project manager.

These estimates are based on the NRC staff's initial review of the application andthey could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities.

Additional delay may occur if thesubmittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry programinitiatives or pilot applications.

If you have any questions, please contact me at 301-415-6020. Regards,Robert G. Schaaf Robert G. Schaaf Senior Project Manager, Watts Bar/Bellefonte

---

Plant Licensing Branch II-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop O-8G9A Washington, DC 20555----------------------------------------------------------------

301-415-6020 (o)

Robert.Schaaf@nrc.gov