ML17150A062: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:CASE NO: 2017-0137 A DATE REC'D: 03/07/2017 SPECIALIST: Argent From: DeSalvo. Andrew RELATED CASE: 2017-0365 To: Cc: Sub_ject: Date: Attachments: Andrew DeSalvo (b) (6) March 7, 2017 FOIA Resource; Ament, Nina Sengupta, Abhtiit: Han@y, CatheriJ.Je [E:xtemal_Sender] APPEAL. Fw: FOrNPA-2017*-()365 Final Respon..:;e; HEAT SINK PERFORMANCE DOCUMENT REQUEST Tuesday, March 07, 2017 1:17:13 PM Ana! Resoonse.odf Freedom oflnfonnation, Privacy & Infommtion Collections Branch Customer Service Division. Office of the Chieflnform.ation Officer Mail Stop: T-5F09 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Conunission Washington. D.C. 20555-0001 FOLA..Resource@nrc.gov Ph: 301-415-7169 Fax: 301-415-5130 STJBJECT: APPEAL Fw: FOIAIPA-2017-0365 Final Response; HEAT SINK PERFORMA.i"'JCE DOCl!TulliNT REQUEST To whom it may concem: I wish to APPEAL the attached NRC's final response to yom* FOL.<\. request, FOIA/P A-2017-00365. The custodiam; of the HEAT SINK PERFORMANCE DOCUN1ENT REQUEST records (DESCRIPTION: see . enclosure, below) are, as follows: Regi01ml Admniistrator: Catherine Haney ''Haney Cathetine" <Catherine.Haney@ru*c.gov> US NRC Region 2 Marquis One Tower 245 Peachtree Center Avenue, Suite 1200 Atlanta, GA 30303Atlanta Inspector Contact lnfonnation: Abhijit Sengupta Reactor Inspector F:ngineering Branch 3 Division of Reactor Safety 404-997-44304 Abh.ijit.Sengupta@nrc.gov Mailing Address: US NRC Region 2 Attn: Abhijit Sengupta Marquis One Tower 245 Peachtree Center Avenue, Suite 1200 Atlanta. GA 30303Atlanta Yours sincerely. AN'DREW DeSAL VO . (b} (6}   
{{#Wiki_filter:CASE NO: 2017-0137 A DATE REC'D: 03/07/2017 SPECIALIST:
(b) (6) 1 Attachments 46KB PDF Final Response.pdf 46KB enclosure HEAT SINK PERFORMANCE DOCUMENT REQUEST Site: Turkey Point Nuclear Plant Docket Nos.: 50-250, 50-251 Inspection Dates: November 28 -December 2, 2016 Entrance Meeting: November 28, 2016 Inspection Procedures: IP 71111.07, "Heat Sink Performance," dated 07/06/2010 Inspectors: Abhijit Sengupta, Reactor Inspector (Lead Inspector) A. Information Requested for the In-Office Preparation Week Please provide the information requested in this section to the NRC Region II Office in care of the lead inspector by October 28, 2016, in order to facilitate the selection of specific items that will be reviewed during the onsite inspection week. The information can be provided in hard copy or electronic format; however, electronic format is preferred, either by digital data storage device (e.g. compact disk), or web-based document management system. If you have any questions regarding this information request, please call the lead inspector as soon as possible. Al Heat Exchangers and Service Water Equipment a) List of heat exchangers (HXs) or equipment cooled by service water (SW) directly or indirectly
Argent From: DeSalvo.
Andrew RELATED CASE: 2017-0365 To: Cc: Sub_ject:
Date: Attachments:
Andrew DeSalvo (b) (6) March 7, 2017 FOIA Resource; Ament, Nina Sengupta, Abhtiit:
Han@y, CatheriJ.Je  
[E:xtemal_Sender]
APPEAL. Fw: FOrNPA-2017*-()365 Final Respon..:;e; HEAT SINK PERFORMANCE DOCUMENT REQUEST Tuesday, March 07, 2017 1:17:13 PM Ana! Resoonse.odf Freedom oflnfonnation, Privacy & Infommtion Collections Branch Customer Service Division.
Office of the Chieflnform.ation Officer Mail Stop: T-5F09 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Conunission Washington.
D.C. 20555-0001 FOLA..Resource@nrc.gov Ph: 301-415-7169 Fax: 301-415-5130 STJBJECT:
APPEAL Fw: FOIAIPA-2017-0365 Final Response; HEAT SINK PERFORMA.i"'JCE DOCl!TulliNT REQUEST To whom it may concem: I wish to APPEAL the attached NRC's final response to yom* FOL.<\. request, FOIA/P A-2017-00365.
The custodiam; of the HEAT SINK PERFORMANCE DOCUN1ENT REQUEST records (DESCRIPTION:
see . enclosure, below) are, as follows:
Regi01ml Admniistrator:
Catherine Haney ''Haney Cathetine"  
<Catherine.Haney@ru*c.gov>
US NRC Region 2 Marquis One Tower 245 Peachtree Center Avenue, Suite 1200 Atlanta, GA 30303Atlanta Inspector Contact lnfonnation:
Abhijit Sengupta Reactor Inspector F:ngineering Branch 3 Division of Reactor Safety 404-997-44304 Abh.ijit.Sengupta@nrc.gov Mailing Address:
US NRC Region 2 Attn: Abhijit Sengupta Marquis One Tower 245 Peachtree Center Avenue, Suite 1200 Atlanta.
GA 30303Atlanta Yours sincerely.
AN'DREW DeSAL VO . (b} (6}   
(b) (6) 1 Attachments 46KB PDF Final Response.pdf 46KB enclosure HEAT SINK PERFORMANCE DOCUMENT REQUEST Site: Turkey Point Nuclear Plant Docket Nos.: 50-250, 50-251 Inspection Dates: November 28 -December 2, 2016 Entrance Meeting:
November 28, 2016 Inspection Procedures:
IP 71111.07, "Heat Sink Performance,"
dated 07/06/2010 Inspectors:
Abhijit Sengupta, Reactor Inspector (Lead Inspector)
A. Information Requested for the In-Office Preparation Week Please provide the information requested in this section to the NRC Region II Office in care of the lead inspector by October 28, 2016, in order to facilitate the selection of specific items that will be reviewed during the onsite inspection week. The information can be provided in hard copy or electronic format; however, electronic format is preferred, either by digital data storage device (e.g. compact disk), or web-based document management system. If you have any questions regarding this information  
: request, please call the lead inspector as soon as possible.
Al Heat Exchangers and Service Water Equipment a) List of heat exchangers (HXs) or equipment cooled by service water (SW) directly or indirectly
* Include the risk ranking from the site specific risk assessment for each listed HX
* Include the risk ranking from the site specific risk assessment for each listed HX
* Detail whether any cleaning or inspection activities are planned during the proposed onsite inspection period for any of the listed HXs. *For HXs di_rectly cooled by SW, provide the testing, inspection, maintenance, and monitoring of biotic fouling and macrofouling program documents b) Detail the HX performance inspection methods for HXs that are inspected/cleaned c) Response to Generic Letter 89-13 including any regulatory commitments made d) Design Basis documents associated with the SW system e) Design Basis documents associated with the Ultimate Heat Sink (UHS) f) SW system flow g) Recent Health Reports associated with the SW System and systems that are cooled by SW 2 h) List of SW system related corrective action documents (with a brief description) which have a Root Cause Analysis or an elevated severity level in the last three years i) Recent Operating Experience Events (2013-2016) j) List of applicable Codes and Industry Guidelines k) List of findings in the heat sink/heat exchanger performance area for the last 3 years 1) .List of redundant or infrequently used HXs m) Chemistry Program for safety-related HXs. n) Detail whether the UHS is above ground encapsulated by embankments, weirs or excavated side slopes; underwater weir or excavation; or forced draft cooling tower or spray pond o) Provide a list of buried or inaccessible piping and the piping test program, inspection or monitoring program p) List of safety-related and non-safety related valve interfaces B. Information to be provided on-site to the inspector at the entrance meeting (November 28, 2016): B.1 Heat Exchangers and Service Water Equipment The inspector will select two to four heat exchangers and/or heat sink samples as required by the inspection procedure during the in-office preparation. The following items will be requested when the selections are made: a) Updated list of System Engineers b) List of any thru-wall leaks including completed or planned corrective actions and structural evaluations c) Provide a copy of the corrective actions and supporting documentation d) For the HXs that have Visual and/or Eddy Current Testing performed, provide a copy of the examination records, examiner qualification records, and associated corrective action documents e) Heat transfer calculations f) Evaluations for the potential of water hammer g) Documentation for controls and operational limits for excessive flow induced vibrations h) Periodic flow test results at/or near maximum design flow 3 i) For an UHS that is encapsulated by embankments, weirs of excavated side slopes provide: (1) third party dam inspection results, and (2) documentation showing that there is sufficient reservoir capacity j) For an UHS that is an underwater weir or excavation provide documentation showing:
* Detail whether any cleaning or inspection activities are planned during the proposed onsite inspection period for any of the listed HXs. *For HXs di_rectly cooled by SW, provide the testing, inspection, maintenance, and monitoring of biotic fouling and macrofouling program documents b) Detail the HX performance inspection methods for HXs that are inspected/cleaned c) Response to Generic Letter 89-13 including any regulatory commitments made d) Design Basis documents associated with the SW system e) Design Basis documents associated with the Ultimate Heat Sink (UHS) f) SW system flow g) Recent Health Reports associated with the SW System and systems that are cooled by SW 2 h) List of SW system related corrective action documents (with a brief description) which have a Root Cause Analysis or an elevated severity level in the last three years i) Recent Operating Experience Events (2013-2016) j) List of applicable Codes and Industry Guidelines k) List of findings in the heat sink/heat exchanger performance area for the last 3 years 1) .List of redundant or infrequently used HXs m) Chemistry Program for safety-related HXs. n) Detail whether the UHS is above ground encapsulated by embankments, weirs or excavated side slopes; underwater weir or excavation; or forced draft cooling tower or spray pond o) Provide a list of buried or inaccessible piping and the piping test program, inspection or monitoring program p) List of safety-related and non-safety related valve interfaces B. Information to be provided on-site to the inspector at the entrance meeting (November 28, 2016): B.1 Heat Exchangers and Service Water Equipment The inspector will select two to four heat exchangers and/or heat sink samples as required by the inspection procedure during the in-office preparation.
The following items will be requested when the selections are made: a) Updated list of System Engineers b) List of any thru-wall leaks including completed or planned corrective actions and structural evaluations c) Provide a copy of the corrective actions and supporting documentation d) For the HXs that have Visual and/or Eddy Current Testing performed, provide a copy of the examination  
: records, examiner qualification  
: records, and associated corrective action documents e) Heat transfer calculations f) Evaluations for the potential of water hammer g) Documentation for controls and operational limits for excessive flow induced vibrations h) Periodic flow test results at/or near maximum design flow 3 i) For an UHS that is encapsulated by embankments, weirs of excavated side slopes provide:  
(1) third party dam inspection  
: results, and (2) documentation showing that there is sufficient reservoir capacity j) For an UHS that is an underwater weir or excavation provide documentation showing:
* Periodic monitoring and trending of sediment build-up
* Periodic monitoring and trending of sediment build-up
* Sufficient reservoir capacity
* Sufficient reservoir capacity
* Considerations for adjacent non-seismic and/or non-safety related structures of possible degradation or blocking of safety-related flow paths due to severe weather or seismic events *Performance monitoring of heat transfer capabilities
* Considerations for adjacent non-seismic and/or non-safety related structures of possible degradation or blocking of safety-related flow paths due to severe weather or seismic events *Performance monitoring of heat transfer capabilities
* Performance monitoring of UHS structural integrity
* Performance monitoring of UHS structural integrity
* SW flow balance test results Inspector Contact Information: Abhijit Sengupta Reactor Inspector Engineering Branch 3 Division of Reactor Safety 404-997-44304 Abhij it. Sengupta@nrc.gov Mailing Address: US NRC Region 2 Attn: Abhijit Sengupta Marquis One Tower 245 Peachtree Center Avenue, Suite 1200 Atlanta, GA 30303Atlanta copyright 2017 Andrew DeSalvo Ownership and Intellectual Property: The OWNER and cited sources retain all right, title, and interest in and to all of the copyrights, database rights, patent rights, trademarks, trade secrets, and all other propriety right in the CONTENT. No rights are granted to the CONTENT. Any right, title or interest arising in any compilation or derivative work created using any CONTENT shall not entitle the RECIPIENT to use any CONTENT. The RECIPIENT does not acquire any copyright ownership or equivalent rights in, or to, any CONTENT or any other property of the OWNER or sources of CONTENT. Confidentiality Statement:
* SW flow balance test results Inspector Contact Information:
This electronic message, and any attachment, contains privileged and confidential information from Andrew J. DeSalvo, intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended RECIPIENT, immediately and permanently delete the message and any attachment from your system. Disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents.ofthis message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify promptly by telephone at (b) (6) or by email reply. ---On Tue, 3/7 /17, Admin, Admin <foia resource@nrc.gov> wrote: > From: Admin, Admin <foia.resource@nrc.gov> >
Abhijit Sengupta Reactor Inspector Engineering Branch 3 Division of Reactor Safety 404-997-44304 Abhij it. Sengupta@nrc.gov Mailing Address:
US NRC Region 2 Attn: Abhijit Sengupta Marquis One Tower 245 Peachtree Center Avenue, Suite 1200 Atlanta, GA 30303Atlanta copyright 2017 Andrew DeSalvo Ownership and Intellectual Property:
The OWNER and cited sources retain all right, title, and interest in and to all of the copyrights, database rights, patent rights, trademarks, trade secrets, and all other propriety right in the CONTENT.
No rights are granted to the CONTENT.
Any right, title or interest arising in any compilation or derivative work created using any CONTENT shall not entitle the RECIPIENT to use any CONTENT.
The RECIPIENT does not acquire any copyright ownership or equivalent rights in, or to, any CONTENT or any other property of the OWNER or sources of CONTENT.
Confidentiality Statement:
This electronic  
: message, and any attachment, contains privileged and confidential information from Andrew J. DeSalvo, intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended RECIPIENT, immediately and permanently delete the message and any attachment from your system. Disclosure,  
: copying, distribution, or use of the contents.ofthis message is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this email in error, please notify promptly by telephone at (b) (6) or by email reply. ---On Tue, 3/7 /17, Admin, Admin <foia resource@nrc.gov>
wrote: > From: Admin, Admin <foia.resource@nrc.gov>  
>


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
FOIA/PA-2017-0365 Final Response >To: (b) (6) > Cc: Nina.Argent@nrc.gov >Date: Tuesday, March 7, 2017, '12:55 PM >  
 
FOIA/PA-2017-0365 Final Response  
>To: (b) (6) > Cc: Nina.Argent@nrc.gov  
>Date: Tuesday, March 7, 2017, '12:55 PM >  


==Dear Mr. DeSalvo:==
==Dear Mr. DeSalvo:==
>Please find attached NRC's final response to your FOIA >request, FOIA/PA-2017-00365. > Please take a moment to help us improve our FOIA processes, > and let us know what your experience has been. Just click >on this embedded link: http*/Jwww nrc goy/readjng-011/foja/foja-user-survey html. > Once you have completed the survey, just click the > "SUBMIT" button and your survey response will be > returned to us. > > > >Thank you, > Freedom of Information, Privacy & Information Collections >Branch > >Customer Service Division, Office of the Chieflnformation >Officer > >Mail Stop: T-5F09 > >U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission > >Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 > FOIA.Resource@nrc.gov >Ph: 301-415-7169 Fax: 301-415-5130}}
 
>Please find attached NRC's final response to your FOIA >request, FOIA/PA-2017-00365.  
> Please take a moment to help us improve our FOIA processes,  
> and let us know what your experience has been. Just click >on this embedded link: http*/Jwww nrc goy/readjng-011/foja/foja-user-survey html. > Once you have completed the survey, just click the > "SUBMIT" button and your survey response will be > returned to us. > > > >Thank you, > Freedom of Information, Privacy & Information Collections  
>Branch > >Customer Service Division, Office of the Chieflnformation  
>Officer  
> >Mail Stop: T-5F09 > >U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  
> >Washington, D.C. 20555-0001  
> FOIA.Resource@nrc.gov  
>Ph: 301-415-7169 Fax: 301-415-5130}}

Revision as of 20:03, 29 June 2018

FOIA/PA-2017-0137A - Appeal Letter Regarding the Agency'S No Records Response Related to FOIA/PA-2017-0365
ML17150A062
Person / Time
Site: Turkey Point  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 03/07/2017
From: DeSalvo A
- No Known Affiliation
To: Argent N
NRC/OCIO
References
FOIA/PA-2017-0137A, FOIA/PA-2017-0365
Download: ML17150A062 (4)
v • d • e


Text

CASE NO: 2017-0137 A DATE REC'D: 03/07/2017 SPECIALIST:

Argent From: DeSalvo.

Andrew RELATED CASE: 2017-0365 To: Cc: Sub_ject:

Date: Attachments:

Andrew DeSalvo (b) (6) March 7, 2017 FOIA Resource; Ament, Nina Sengupta, Abhtiit:

Han@y, CatheriJ.Je

[E:xtemal_Sender]

APPEAL. Fw: FOrNPA-2017*-()365 Final Respon..:;e; HEAT SINK PERFORMANCE DOCUMENT REQUEST Tuesday, March 07, 2017 1:17:13 PM Ana! Resoonse.odf Freedom oflnfonnation, Privacy & Infommtion Collections Branch Customer Service Division.

Office of the Chieflnform.ation Officer Mail Stop: T-5F09 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Conunission Washington.

D.C. 20555-0001 FOLA..Resource@nrc.gov Ph: 301-415-7169 Fax: 301-415-5130 STJBJECT:

APPEAL Fw: FOIAIPA-2017-0365 Final Response; HEAT SINK PERFORMA.i"'JCE DOCl!TulliNT REQUEST To whom it may concem: I wish to APPEAL the attached NRC's final response to yom* FOL.<\. request, FOIA/P A-2017-00365.

The custodiam; of the HEAT SINK PERFORMANCE DOCUN1ENT REQUEST records (DESCRIPTION:

see . enclosure, below) are, as follows:

Regi01ml Admniistrator:

Catherine Haney Haney Cathetine"

<Catherine.Haney@ru*c.gov>

US NRC Region 2 Marquis One Tower 245 Peachtree Center Avenue, Suite 1200 Atlanta, GA 30303Atlanta Inspector Contact lnfonnation:

Abhijit Sengupta Reactor Inspector F:ngineering Branch 3 Division of Reactor Safety 404-997-44304 Abh.ijit.Sengupta@nrc.gov Mailing Address:

US NRC Region 2 Attn: Abhijit Sengupta Marquis One Tower 245 Peachtree Center Avenue, Suite 1200 Atlanta.

GA 30303Atlanta Yours sincerely.

AN'DREW DeSAL VO . (b} (6}

(b) (6) 1 Attachments 46KB PDF Final Response.pdf 46KB enclosure HEAT SINK PERFORMANCE DOCUMENT REQUEST Site: Turkey Point Nuclear Plant Docket Nos.: 50-250, 50-251 Inspection Dates: November 28 -December 2, 2016 Entrance Meeting:

November 28, 2016 Inspection Procedures:

IP 71111.07, "Heat Sink Performance,"

dated 07/06/2010 Inspectors:

Abhijit Sengupta, Reactor Inspector (Lead Inspector)

A. Information Requested for the In-Office Preparation Week Please provide the information requested in this section to the NRC Region II Office in care of the lead inspector by October 28, 2016, in order to facilitate the selection of specific items that will be reviewed during the onsite inspection week. The information can be provided in hard copy or electronic format; however, electronic format is preferred, either by digital data storage device (e.g. compact disk), or web-based document management system. If you have any questions regarding this information

request, please call the lead inspector as soon as possible.

Al Heat Exchangers and Service Water Equipment a) List of heat exchangers (HXs) or equipment cooled by service water (SW) directly or indirectly

  • Include the risk ranking from the site specific risk assessment for each listed HX
  • Detail whether any cleaning or inspection activities are planned during the proposed onsite inspection period for any of the listed HXs. *For HXs di_rectly cooled by SW, provide the testing, inspection, maintenance, and monitoring of biotic fouling and macrofouling program documents b) Detail the HX performance inspection methods for HXs that are inspected/cleaned c) Response to Generic Letter 89-13 including any regulatory commitments made d) Design Basis documents associated with the SW system e) Design Basis documents associated with the Ultimate Heat Sink (UHS) f) SW system flow g) Recent Health Reports associated with the SW System and systems that are cooled by SW 2 h) List of SW system related corrective action documents (with a brief description) which have a Root Cause Analysis or an elevated severity level in the last three years i) Recent Operating Experience Events (2013-2016) j) List of applicable Codes and Industry Guidelines k) List of findings in the heat sink/heat exchanger performance area for the last 3 years 1) .List of redundant or infrequently used HXs m) Chemistry Program for safety-related HXs. n) Detail whether the UHS is above ground encapsulated by embankments, weirs or excavated side slopes; underwater weir or excavation; or forced draft cooling tower or spray pond o) Provide a list of buried or inaccessible piping and the piping test program, inspection or monitoring program p) List of safety-related and non-safety related valve interfaces B. Information to be provided on-site to the inspector at the entrance meeting (November 28, 2016): B.1 Heat Exchangers and Service Water Equipment The inspector will select two to four heat exchangers and/or heat sink samples as required by the inspection procedure during the in-office preparation.

The following items will be requested when the selections are made: a) Updated list of System Engineers b) List of any thru-wall leaks including completed or planned corrective actions and structural evaluations c) Provide a copy of the corrective actions and supporting documentation d) For the HXs that have Visual and/or Eddy Current Testing performed, provide a copy of the examination

records, examiner qualification
records, and associated corrective action documents e) Heat transfer calculations f) Evaluations for the potential of water hammer g) Documentation for controls and operational limits for excessive flow induced vibrations h) Periodic flow test results at/or near maximum design flow 3 i) For an UHS that is encapsulated by embankments, weirs of excavated side slopes provide:

(1) third party dam inspection

results, and (2) documentation showing that there is sufficient reservoir capacity j) For an UHS that is an underwater weir or excavation provide documentation showing:
  • Periodic monitoring and trending of sediment build-up
  • Sufficient reservoir capacity
  • Considerations for adjacent non-seismic and/or non-safety related structures of possible degradation or blocking of safety-related flow paths due to severe weather or seismic events *Performance monitoring of heat transfer capabilities
  • Performance monitoring of UHS structural integrity
  • SW flow balance test results Inspector Contact Information:

Abhijit Sengupta Reactor Inspector Engineering Branch 3 Division of Reactor Safety 404-997-44304 Abhij it. Sengupta@nrc.gov Mailing Address:

US NRC Region 2 Attn: Abhijit Sengupta Marquis One Tower 245 Peachtree Center Avenue, Suite 1200 Atlanta, GA 30303Atlanta copyright 2017 Andrew DeSalvo Ownership and Intellectual Property:

The OWNER and cited sources retain all right, title, and interest in and to all of the copyrights, database rights, patent rights, trademarks, trade secrets, and all other propriety right in the CONTENT.

No rights are granted to the CONTENT.

Any right, title or interest arising in any compilation or derivative work created using any CONTENT shall not entitle the RECIPIENT to use any CONTENT.

The RECIPIENT does not acquire any copyright ownership or equivalent rights in, or to, any CONTENT or any other property of the OWNER or sources of CONTENT.

Confidentiality Statement:

This electronic

message, and any attachment, contains privileged and confidential information from Andrew J. DeSalvo, intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended RECIPIENT, immediately and permanently delete the message and any attachment from your system. Disclosure,
copying, distribution, or use of the contents.ofthis message is strictly prohibited.

If you have received this email in error, please notify promptly by telephone at (b) (6) or by email reply. ---On Tue, 3/7 /17, Admin, Admin <foia resource@nrc.gov>

wrote: > From: Admin, Admin <foia.resource@nrc.gov>

>

Subject:

FOIA/PA-2017-0365 Final Response

>To: (b) (6) > Cc: Nina.Argent@nrc.gov

>Date: Tuesday, March 7, 2017, '12:55 PM >

Dear Mr. DeSalvo:

>Please find attached NRC's final response to your FOIA >request, FOIA/PA-2017-00365.

> Please take a moment to help us improve our FOIA processes,

> and let us know what your experience has been. Just click >on this embedded link: http*/Jwww nrc goy/readjng-011/foja/foja-user-survey html. > Once you have completed the survey, just click the > "SUBMIT" button and your survey response will be > returned to us. > > > >Thank you, > Freedom of Information, Privacy & Information Collections

>Branch > >Customer Service Division, Office of the Chieflnformation

>Officer

> >Mail Stop: T-5F09 > >U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

> >Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

> FOIA.Resource@nrc.gov

>Ph: 301-415-7169 Fax: 301-415-5130

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML17150A062&oldid=752324"