ML18025B121: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:NorthwestMedical IsotopesConstruction Permit Application Review*Mandatory Hearing (Overview Panel)*January 23, 2018 Panelists*Michele Evans-Deputy Director for Reactor Safety Programs and Mission Support, NRR*MaryJane Ross-Lee-Deputy Director, NRR/DLP*Joseph Donoghue-Deputy Director, NRR/DMLR*Brian Smith-Deputy Director, NMSS/FCSE2 99Mo Overview*99Mo decays to 99mTc-Effective diagnosis-Minimal exposure*50,000 procedures daily*No domestically-produced supply3 Establishing a Domestic Supply of 99Mo*NRC supports U.S. policy objectives to establish domestic 99Mo production*First construction permit for domestic 99Mo production issued to SHINE Medical Technologies in 2016*Northwest Medical Isotopes would produce 99Mo by processing irradiated low enriched uranium targets4 Conducting the NWMI Review*Review of NWMI application  supported by procedural efficiencies and previous licensing experience-Two-part application submission-Document templates-Permit condition supporting quality assurance implementation*Staff and contractors spent ~12,000 hours reviewing NWMI application 5 Authorizing Construction*NWMI seeks authorization to construct 10 CFR Part 50 production facility*Staff review based on preliminary design and analysis of facility-Design details may be left for operating license application-Target fabrication activities to be considered under a 10 CFR Part 70 application6 Conducting the Safety Review7EnvironmentalReviewACRS ReviewMandatory HearingApplication Submitted to NRCCommission Decision on PermitSafetyReview Tailoring Review Methodology*Review accommodated unique aspects of the NWMI application*Staff adapted existing guidance for research reactors, production facilities, and fuel cycle facilities*Review focused on whether there was reasonable assurance that the final design would conform to design bases8 Additional Information*In response to staff requests, NWMI provided additional information*In some cases, permit conditions were necessary to support findings*Regulatory commitments track items for resolution in Final Safety Analysis Report9 EnvironmentalRequirements*National Environmental PolicyAct-Informs Federal decision making-Publicdisclosure*NRC environmentalregulations in      10 CFR Part 51-NRC regulations implementing the National Environmental Policy Act10 Environmental ReviewProcessEnvironmentalSiteAuditDraft  Environmental  Impact  StatementScoping*Comment  Period**Opportunity  for Public  InvolvementFinal  Environmental  Impact  StatementEnvironmentalReportRequestforAdditionalInformation11 Proposed Discovery RidgeSite12*Agriculturalland*Previouslydisturbed*No surface water features*No threatened or endangeredspecies*No historical or culturalresources Statutory and Regulatory Basis for Construction Permit Issuance*Commission authorized to issue permits by Atomic Energy Act, Section 103*Applicable requirements in                  10 CFR Parts 20, 50, and 51*Performance requirements in              10 CFR Part 70 also considered13 Construction Permit Findings*Preliminary facility design described*Further technical or design information may be left for FSAR*Ongoing research and development identified*Facility can be constructed and operated without undue risk14 Construction Permit Considerations*Construction will not endanger public health and safety*NWMI is technically and financially qualified*Environmental requirements have been satisfied15 Introducing the Review Panels16PanelNumberDiscussion TopicsEvaluationAreasSafety Panel 1Licensing ConsiderationsSafetyEvaluation ReportChapters1, 4, and 12Safety Panel 2Accident Analysis MethodologySafety Evaluation ReportChapter13Environmental Panel*Final EnvironmentalImpact Statement Process*Scope and Connected Actions*Analysis of AlternativesFinal Environmental Impact Statement Acronyms*NRR -Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation*DLP -Division of Licensing Projects*DMLR-Division of Materials and License Renewal*NMSS-Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards*FCSE-Division of Fuel Cycle Safety, Safeguards, and Environmental Review17 Acronyms*99Mo-molybdenum-99*99mTc-technetium-99m*NRC-U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission*NWMI-Northwest Medical Isotopes*CFR-Code of Federal Regulations*ACRS-Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards*FSAR-final safety analysis report18}}
{{#Wiki_filter:Northwest Medical IsotopesConstruction Permit Application Review*Mandatory Hearing (Overview Panel)
*January 23, 2018 Panelists
*Michele Evans
-Deputy Director for Reactor Safety Programs and Mission Support, NRR
*MaryJane Ross
-Lee-Deputy Director, NRR/DLP
*Joseph Donoghue
-Deputy Director, NRR/DMLR
*Brian Smith
-Deputy Director, NMSS/FCSE 2
99Mo Overview
*99Mo decays to 99mTc-Effective diagnosis
-Minimal exposure
*50,000 procedures daily
*No domestically
-produced supply3 Establishing a Domestic Supply of 99Mo*NRC supports U.S. policy objectives to establish domestic 99Mo production
*First construction permit for domestic 99Mo production issued to SHINE Medical Technologies in 2016
*Northwest Medical Isotopes would produce 99Mo by processing irradiated low enriched uranium targets 4
Conducting the NWMI Review
*Review of NWMI application  supported by procedural efficiencies and previous licensing experience
-Two-part application submission
-Document templates
-Permit condition supporting quality assurance implementation
*Staff and contractors spent ~12,000 hours reviewing NWMI application 5
Authorizing Construction
*NWMI seeks authorization to construct 10 CFR Part 50 production facility*Staff review based on preliminary design and analysis of facility
-Design details may be left for operating license application
-Target fabrication activities to be considered under a 10 CFR Part 70 application 6
Conducting the Safety Review 7Environmental ReviewACRS ReviewMandatory HearingApplication Submitted to NRCCommission Decision on PermitSafetyReview Tailoring Review Methodology
*Review accommodated unique aspects of the NWMI application
*Staff adapted existing guidance for research reactors, production facilities, and fuel cycle facilities
*Review focused on whether there was reasonable assurance that the final design would conform to design bases 8
Additional Information
*In response to staff requests, NWMI provided additional information
*In some cases, permit conditions were necessary to support findings
*Regulatory commitments track items for resolution in Final Safety Analysis Report9 Environmental Requirements
*National Environmental PolicyAct-Informs Federal decision making-Publicdisclosure
*NRC environmentalregulations in      10 CFR Part 51
-NRC regulations implementing the National Environmental Policy Act 10 Environmental ReviewProcessEnvironmentalSiteAuditDraft  Environmental  Impact  StatementScoping*Comment  Period**Opportunity  for Public  InvolvementFinal  Environmental  Impact  Statement EnvironmentalReportRequestforAdditional Information11 Proposed Discovery Ridge Site12*Agriculturalland*Previouslydisturbed
*No surface water features*No threatened or endangeredspecies*No historical or culturalresources Statutory and Regulatory Basis for Construction Permit Issuance
*Commission authorized to issue permits by Atomic Energy Act, Section 103
*Applicable requirements in                  10 CFR Parts 20, 50, and 51
*Performance requirements in              10 CFR Part 70 also considered 13 Construction Permit Findings
*Preliminary facility design described
*Further technical or design information may be left for FSAR
*Ongoing research and development identified
*Facility can be constructed and operated without undue risk 14 Construction Permit Considerations
*Construction will not endanger public health and safety
*NWMI is technically and financially qualified
*Environmental requirements have been satisfied 15 Introducing the Review Panels 16PanelNumberDiscussion Topics Evaluation AreasSafety Panel 1Licensing ConsiderationsSafetyEvaluation ReportChapters1, 4, and 12Safety Panel 2Accident Analysis MethodologySafety Evaluation ReportChapter13Environmental Panel
*Final EnvironmentalImpact Statement Process*Scope and Connected Actions
*Analysis of AlternativesFinal Environmental Impact Statement Acronyms*NRR -Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
*DLP -Division of Licensing Projects
*DMLR-Division of Materials and License Renewal
*NMSS-Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards
*FCSE-Division of Fuel Cycle Safety, Safeguards, and Environmental Review17 Acronyms*99Mo-molybdenum
-99*99mTc-technetium
-99m*NRC-U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
*NWMI-Northwest Medical Isotopes
*CFR-Code of Federal Regulations
*ACRS-Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards
*FSAR-final safety analysis report 18}}

Revision as of 04:59, 29 June 2018

Official Exhibit - NRC-010-MA-CM01 - Staff Presentation Slides - Overview (Jan. 16, 2018)
ML18025B121
Person / Time
Site: Northwest Medical Isotopes
Issue date: 01/16/2018
From:
NRC/OGC
To:
NRC/OCM
SECY RAS
References
50-609-CP, Construction Permit Mndtry Hrg, RAS 54173
Download: ML18025B121 (18)


Text

Northwest Medical IsotopesConstruction Permit Application Review*Mandatory Hearing (Overview Panel)

  • January 23, 2018 Panelists
  • Michele Evans

-Deputy Director for Reactor Safety Programs and Mission Support, NRR

  • MaryJane Ross

-Lee-Deputy Director, NRR/DLP

  • Joseph Donoghue

-Deputy Director, NRR/DMLR

  • Brian Smith

-Deputy Director, NMSS/FCSE 2

99Mo Overview

-Minimal exposure

  • 50,000 procedures daily
  • No domestically

-produced supply3 Establishing a Domestic Supply of 99Mo*NRC supports U.S. policy objectives to establish domestic 99Mo production

  • First construction permit for domestic 99Mo production issued to SHINE Medical Technologies in 2016
  • Northwest Medical Isotopes would produce 99Mo by processing irradiated low enriched uranium targets 4

Conducting the NWMI Review

  • Review of NWMI application supported by procedural efficiencies and previous licensing experience

-Two-part application submission

-Document templates

-Permit condition supporting quality assurance implementation

  • Staff and contractors spent ~12,000 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> reviewing NWMI application 5

Authorizing Construction

  • NWMI seeks authorization to construct 10 CFR Part 50 production facility*Staff review based on preliminary design and analysis of facility

-Design details may be left for operating license application

-Target fabrication activities to be considered under a 10 CFR Part 70 application 6

Conducting the Safety Review 7Environmental ReviewACRS ReviewMandatory HearingApplication Submitted to NRCCommission Decision on PermitSafetyReview Tailoring Review Methodology

  • Review accommodated unique aspects of the NWMI application
  • Staff adapted existing guidance for research reactors, production facilities, and fuel cycle facilities
  • Review focused on whether there was reasonable assurance that the final design would conform to design bases 8

Additional Information

  • In response to staff requests, NWMI provided additional information
  • In some cases, permit conditions were necessary to support findings
  • Regulatory commitments track items for resolution in Final Safety Analysis Report9 Environmental Requirements
  • National Environmental PolicyAct-Informs Federal decision making-Publicdisclosure

-NRC regulations implementing the National Environmental Policy Act 10 Environmental ReviewProcessEnvironmentalSiteAuditDraft Environmental Impact StatementScoping*Comment Period**Opportunity for Public InvolvementFinal Environmental Impact Statement EnvironmentalReportRequestforAdditional Information11 Proposed Discovery Ridge Site12*Agriculturalland*Previouslydisturbed

  • No surface water features*No threatened or endangeredspecies*No historical or culturalresources Statutory and Regulatory Basis for Construction Permit Issuance
  • Commission authorized to issue permits by Atomic Energy Act, Section 103
  • Performance requirements in 10 CFR Part 70 also considered 13 Construction Permit Findings
  • Preliminary facility design described
  • Further technical or design information may be left for FSAR
  • Ongoing research and development identified
  • Facility can be constructed and operated without undue risk 14 Construction Permit Considerations
  • Construction will not endanger public health and safety
  • NWMI is technically and financially qualified
  • Environmental requirements have been satisfied 15 Introducing the Review Panels 16PanelNumberDiscussion Topics Evaluation AreasSafety Panel 1Licensing ConsiderationsSafetyEvaluation ReportChapters1, 4, and 12Safety Panel 2Accident Analysis MethodologySafety Evaluation ReportChapter13Environmental Panel
  • Final EnvironmentalImpact Statement Process*Scope and Connected Actions
  • Analysis of AlternativesFinal Environmental Impact Statement Acronyms*NRR -Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
  • DLP -Division of Licensing Projects
  • NMSS-Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards
  • FCSE-Division of Fuel Cycle Safety, Safeguards, and Environmental Review17 Acronyms*99Mo-molybdenum

-99*99mTc-technetium

-99m*NRC-U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

  • NWMI-Northwest Medical Isotopes
  • CFR-Code of Federal Regulations
  • ACRS-Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards
  • FSAR-final safety analysis report 18