ML20203L897: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
#REDIRECT [[IR 05000361/1997015]]
{{Adams
| number = ML20203L897
| issue date = 03/04/1998
| title = Ack Receipt of 971024 & s Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-361/97-15 & 50-362/97-15 on 970630-0703
| author name = Howell A
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
| addressee name = Ray H
| addressee affiliation = SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO.
| docket = 05000361, 05000362
| license number =
| contact person =
| document report number = 50-361-97-15, 50-362-97-15, EA-97-414, NUDOCS 9803060289
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
| page count = 3
}}
See also: [[see also::IR 05000361/1997015]]
 
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:_ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
[p* **%go.
UNITI:3 STATE.S
y
',t,-
' ,;
NUCLE AR REGULATORY COMMISSION
*
si
g
ntcoora iv
O, M
g
0l1 AVAP4 PL A!A OthvE SUITE 400
q
[
Af 4LifJC TOf 4 1 E * AS N/)11.an64
5
"o
.....
March 4, 1998
EA 97-414
Harold B. Ray, Executive Vice President
Southem Califomia Edison Co.
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station
P.O. Box 128
San Clemente, Califomia 92674-0128
SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO NRC INSPECTION REPORT 50-361/9715; 50-362/9715
Dear Mr. Ray:
,
Thank you for your letters of October 24,1997, and January 30,1998, in response to
our letter and Notice of Violation of September 10,1997, and letter of January 15,1998,
concerning the failure to adequately evaluate the appropriateness of the performance of
prev 6ntive maintenance prior to placing the Unit 3 reactor coolant system under a 10 CFR
50.65(a)(2) category. We have reviewed your reply and find it responsive to the concems raised
in our Notice of Violation. We will review the implementation of your corrective actions during a
future inspection to determine that full compliance has been achieved and will be :naintained.
Sincerely,
p
e
D
rthur f&
Howell 111, Direc or
Division of Reactor Safety
Docket Nos.: 50-361;50-362
License Nos.: NPF 10; NPF e5
cc:
Chairman, Board of Supervisors
County of San Diego
1600 Pacific Highway, Room 335
San Diego, California 92101 --
I
9003060289 9s03o4
b
PDR
ADOCK 05000361
0
PDR
 
.- - ._- . _ - .. .-. .. - ...- ..
- - - - ..-
i
.
-
.
Southem Califomia Edison Co.
3-
,
i
Mr. Truman Bums %4r. Robert Kinosien
Califomia Public Utilities Commission
505 Van Ness, Rm 4102
San Francisco, Califomia 94102
 
. _ __- _
*
.
Southem Califomia Edison Co.
-4-
.
E Mail oport to T. Frye (TJF)
E Mell report to D. Lange (DJL)
E Mail repoti to NRR Event Tracking System (IPAS)
E-Mail report to Document Control Desk (DOCDESK)
bec to DCD (IE01)
bec distrib. by RIV:
Regional Administrator
Resident Inspector
DRS Director
DRS Deputy Director
DRP Director
DRS PSB
Branch Chief (DRP/F, WCFO)
MIS System
Senior Project inspector (DRP/F, WCFO)
RIV File
Branch Chief (DRP/TSS)
i
l
WCFO File
,
DOCUMENT NAME: R:\\_SO23\\SO715ak2.lB
To receive copy of document, Indicate in box:"C" = Copy wthout enclosures *E" = Copy wlth enclosures "N" = No copy
RIV:TA:DRS
sg
D:DRE][)(
IBames/imb ME) ATHowdtf
02W98
02$98
'
__
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
.
 
*
e
Southern California Edison Co.
-4
.
E Mail report to T. Frye (TJF) -
E Mail report to D. Lange (DJL)
E. Mail report to NRR Event Tracking System (IPAS)
E Mail report to Document Control Desk (DOCDESK)
bec to DCD (IE01)
bec distrib, by RIV:
Regional Administrator
Resident inspector
DRS Director
DRS Deputy Director
DRP Director
DRS PSB
Branch Chief (DRP/F, WCFO)
MIS System
Senior Project 1,1spector (DRP/F, WCFO)
RIV File
Branch Chief (DRP/TSS)
WCFO File
DOCUMENT NAME: R:\\ SO23\\SO715ak2.lB
To receive copy of document, Indicate in boa: *C" = Copy without enclosures "E" = Copy with enclosures "N" = No copy
RIV:TA:DRS
sg
D;DRJ91[)(
IBarnes/Imb 6/2)! ' Now#
02W98
l02fj98
'
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
..
..
.
 
-
.- -
- -
- - - -
.
.. ga o,mmu,-
.
7l d EDISON
=
An (D/$0V IV7s AA47 TON 4L Company
January 30,1998
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
~
>
Document Control Desk
pg
4
,
,
Washington, D.C. 20555
t
Gentlemen:
_. 2
'
_ . _ _
Subject:
Docket Nos. 50-361 and 50 362
Reply to a Notice of Violation
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3
References: (1) Lette,', Mr. A. T. Howall 111 (USNRC) to Mr. Harold B. Ray (f 3E),
dated September 10,1997
(2) Letter, Mr. Harold B. Ray (SCE) to Mr. E. W. Merschoff (USNRC),
dated October 24,1997
(3) Letter, Mr. E. W. Merschoff (USNRC) to Mr. Harold B. Ray (SCE),
dated January 15,1998
Reference 1 transmitted the results of NRC Inspection Report No. 50 361/97-15 and
50-362/97-15, conducted June 30 through July 3,1997, at the San Onofre Nuclear
Generating Station, Units 2 and 3. The enclosure to Reference 1 also transmitted a
Notice of Violation (9715-01). This violation involved the failure to adequately evaluate
the appropriateness of the performance of preventive maintenance prior to placing the
Unit 3 reactor coolant system (RCS) under a 10 CFR 50.65(a)(2) category.
Reference 2 transmitted SCE's original response to the Notice of Violation. In that
response it was stated that SCE believes no violation of the Maintenance Rule
occurred. Notwithstanding this conclusion, in accordance with your guidance in
Reference 3, we are providing the following response to bring the issue to closure. As
noted in References 2 and 3, the reason for the violation was that the failure history
screening performed as part of the Maintenance Rule implementation prior to July 10,
1996, did not include a review of construction work orders (CWOs). Thus, SCE's
decision to place the RCS under 10 CFR 50.65(a)(2) was based on incomplete data.
As corrective actions SCE has: 1) completed a review of CWOs implemented sinca
July 1993 and determined that this was an isolated occurrence; 2) changed the
Maintenance Rule monthly review process to include CWO's; 3) placed the reactor
coolant systems of both units in Category (a)(1) as a result of occurrence- 1 RCS
P.O,Ikn 128
San Clemente. CA 92674-0128
714 168 1480
_
m , , . ,_
,
JSozosp= n sm
_
_
_
 
_ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ -
- - .
.
. , .
.
Document Control Desk
2-
January 30,1998
pret sure boundary leakage, including nozzle leakage; and 4) revised the Alloy 600
prog'am plan,90022," Susceptibility of Reactor Coolant System Alloy 600 Nozzles to
Primary Water Stress Corrosion Cracking and Replacement Program," to implement a
strategy to replace penetrations over time. As noted in Reference 3, we plan to
complete allinstrument nozzle repairs by the end of the Cycle 10 refueling outages.
No further corrective actions are planned, and the date of full compliance was July 23,
1997, when the Unit 3 RCS was placed in Category (a)(1).
If you have any further questions, please contact me.
.
Sincerely,
S&E. k
'
"\\
Dwight E. Nunn
cc:
E. W. Merschoff, Regional Administrator, NRC Region IV
K. E. Perkins, Director, Walnut Creek Field Office, NRC Region IV
M. B. Fields, NRC Project Manager, San Onofre Units 2 and 3
J. A. Sloan, NRC Senior Resident in:pector, San Onofre Units 2 and 3
l
<
-
}}

Latest revision as of 00:10, 24 May 2025

Ack Receipt of 971024 & s Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-361/97-15 & 50-362/97-15 on 970630-0703
ML20203L897
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre  Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 03/04/1998
From: Howell A
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To: Ray H
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO.
References
50-361-97-15, 50-362-97-15, EA-97-414, NUDOCS 9803060289
Download: ML20203L897 (3)


See also: IR 05000361/1997015

Text

_ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

[p* **%go.

UNITI:3 STATE.S

y

',t,-

' ,;

NUCLE AR REGULATORY COMMISSION

si

g

ntcoora iv

O, M

g

0l1 AVAP4 PL A!A OthvE SUITE 400

q

[

Af 4LifJC TOf 4 1 E * AS N/)11.an64

5

"o

.....

March 4, 1998

EA 97-414

Harold B. Ray, Executive Vice President

Southem Califomia Edison Co.

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station

P.O. Box 128

San Clemente, Califomia 92674-0128

SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO NRC INSPECTION REPORT 50-361/9715; 50-362/9715

Dear Mr. Ray:

,

Thank you for your letters of October 24,1997, and January 30,1998, in response to

our letter and Notice of Violation of September 10,1997, and letter of January 15,1998,

concerning the failure to adequately evaluate the appropriateness of the performance of

prev 6ntive maintenance prior to placing the Unit 3 reactor coolant system under a 10 CFR 50.65(a)(2) category. We have reviewed your reply and find it responsive to the concems raised

in our Notice of Violation. We will review the implementation of your corrective actions during a

future inspection to determine that full compliance has been achieved and will be :naintained.

Sincerely,

p

e

D

rthur f&

Howell 111, Direc or

Division of Reactor Safety

Docket Nos.: 50-361;50-362

License Nos.: NPF 10; NPF e5

cc:

Chairman, Board of Supervisors

County of San Diego

1600 Pacific Highway, Room 335

San Diego, California 92101 --

I

9003060289 9s03o4

b

PDR

ADOCK 05000361

0

PDR

.- - ._- . _ - .. .-. .. - ...- ..

- - - - ..-

i

.

-

.

Southem Califomia Edison Co.

3-

,

i

Mr. Truman Bums %4r. Robert Kinosien

Califomia Public Utilities Commission

505 Van Ness, Rm 4102

San Francisco, Califomia 94102

. _ __- _

.

Southem Califomia Edison Co.

-4-

.

E Mail oport to T. Frye (TJF)

E Mell report to D. Lange (DJL)

E Mail repoti to NRR Event Tracking System (IPAS)

E-Mail report to Document Control Desk (DOCDESK)

bec to DCD (IE01)

bec distrib. by RIV:

Regional Administrator

Resident Inspector

DRS Director

DRS Deputy Director

DRP Director

DRS PSB

Branch Chief (DRP/F, WCFO)

MIS System

Senior Project inspector (DRP/F, WCFO)

RIV File

Branch Chief (DRP/TSS)

i

l

WCFO File

,

DOCUMENT NAME: R:\\_SO23\\SO715ak2.lB

To receive copy of document, Indicate in box:"C" = Copy wthout enclosures *E" = Copy wlth enclosures "N" = No copy

RIV:TA:DRS

sg

D:DRE][)(

IBames/imb ME) ATHowdtf

02W98

02$98

'

__

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

.

e

Southern California Edison Co.

-4

.

E Mail report to T. Frye (TJF) -

E Mail report to D. Lange (DJL)

E. Mail report to NRR Event Tracking System (IPAS)

E Mail report to Document Control Desk (DOCDESK)

bec to DCD (IE01)

bec distrib, by RIV:

Regional Administrator

Resident inspector

DRS Director

DRS Deputy Director

DRP Director

DRS PSB

Branch Chief (DRP/F, WCFO)

MIS System

Senior Project 1,1spector (DRP/F, WCFO)

RIV File

Branch Chief (DRP/TSS)

WCFO File

DOCUMENT NAME: R:\\ SO23\\SO715ak2.lB

To receive copy of document, Indicate in boa: *C" = Copy without enclosures "E" = Copy with enclosures "N" = No copy

RIV:TA:DRS

sg

D;DRJ91[)(

IBarnes/Imb 6/2)! ' Now#

02W98

l02fj98

'

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

..

..

.

-

.- -

- -

- - - -

.

.. ga o,mmu,-

.

7l d EDISON

=

An (D/$0V IV7s AA47 TON 4L Company

January 30,1998

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

~

>

Document Control Desk

pg

4

,

,

Washington, D.C. 20555

t

Gentlemen:

_. 2

'

_ . _ _

Subject:

Docket Nos. 50-361 and 50 362

Reply to a Notice of Violation

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3

References: (1) Lette,', Mr. A. T. Howall 111 (USNRC) to Mr. Harold B. Ray (f 3E),

dated September 10,1997

(2) Letter, Mr. Harold B. Ray (SCE) to Mr. E. W. Merschoff (USNRC),

dated October 24,1997

(3) Letter, Mr. E. W. Merschoff (USNRC) to Mr. Harold B. Ray (SCE),

dated January 15,1998

Reference 1 transmitted the results of NRC Inspection Report No. 50 361/97-15 and

50-362/97-15, conducted June 30 through July 3,1997, at the San Onofre Nuclear

Generating Station, Units 2 and 3. The enclosure to Reference 1 also transmitted a

Notice of Violation (9715-01). This violation involved the failure to adequately evaluate

the appropriateness of the performance of preventive maintenance prior to placing the

Unit 3 reactor coolant system (RCS) under a 10 CFR 50.65(a)(2) category.

Reference 2 transmitted SCE's original response to the Notice of Violation. In that

response it was stated that SCE believes no violation of the Maintenance Rule

occurred. Notwithstanding this conclusion, in accordance with your guidance in

Reference 3, we are providing the following response to bring the issue to closure. As

noted in References 2 and 3, the reason for the violation was that the failure history

screening performed as part of the Maintenance Rule implementation prior to July 10,

1996, did not include a review of construction work orders (CWOs). Thus, SCE's

decision to place the RCS under 10 CFR 50.65(a)(2) was based on incomplete data.

As corrective actions SCE has: 1) completed a review of CWOs implemented sinca

July 1993 and determined that this was an isolated occurrence; 2) changed the

Maintenance Rule monthly review process to include CWO's; 3) placed the reactor

coolant systems of both units in Category (a)(1) as a result of occurrence- 1 RCS

P.O,Ikn 128

San Clemente. CA 92674-0128

714 168 1480

_

m , , . ,_

,

JSozosp= n sm

_

_

_

_ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ -

- - .

.

. , .

.

Document Control Desk

2-

January 30,1998

pret sure boundary leakage, including nozzle leakage; and 4) revised the Alloy 600

prog'am plan,90022," Susceptibility of Reactor Coolant System Alloy 600 Nozzles to

Primary Water Stress Corrosion Cracking and Replacement Program," to implement a

strategy to replace penetrations over time. As noted in Reference 3, we plan to

complete allinstrument nozzle repairs by the end of the Cycle 10 refueling outages.

No further corrective actions are planned, and the date of full compliance was July 23,

1997, when the Unit 3 RCS was placed in Category (a)(1).

If you have any further questions, please contact me.

.

Sincerely,

S&E. k

'

"\\

Dwight E. Nunn

cc:

E. W. Merschoff, Regional Administrator, NRC Region IV

K. E. Perkins, Director, Walnut Creek Field Office, NRC Region IV

M. B. Fields, NRC Project Manager, San Onofre Units 2 and 3

J. A. Sloan, NRC Senior Resident in:pector, San Onofre Units 2 and 3

l

<

-