ML062720120: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page by program invented by StriderTol
 
StriderTol Bot change
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 09/29/2006
| issue date = 09/29/2006
| title = Management Directive 8.3 Evaluation for Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station (PV 06-19)
| title = Management Directive 8.3 Evaluation for Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station (PV 06-19)
| author name = Werner G E
| author name = Werner G
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-IV/DRP/RPB-B
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-IV/DRP/RPB-B
| addressee name = Mallett B S
| addressee name = Mallett B
| addressee affiliation = NRC/RGN-IV/ORA
| addressee affiliation = NRC/RGN-IV/ORA
| docket = 05000530
| docket = 05000530
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:-1-PLA NT Palo Verde Nuc lear Generating S tation EVE NT DA TE September 22, 20 06 RESPONSIBLE BRANCH CHIEF Troy Pruett - Greg Werner Acting EVA LUA TI ON DA TE September 26, 20 06 BRI EF DES CRI PTI ON OF THE SI GNI FI CA NT OP ERA TI ONA L E VEN T OR D EGRA DED CONDI TI ON On July 25 , 2006, Unit 3, Train A, EDG failed to dev elop output voltage duri ng a surveil lance test. Th e lic ensee's root cause determ ined plast ic de bris p otenti ally prev ented auxi liary contacts from properly functioning resul ting in shorti ng out the generator fiel d during startup preventing a proper field flash. Two repla cement relay s obtained from the licensee warehouse exhibite d the same degrade d condition. A third rel ay was satisfactorily tested and installed.
{{#Wiki_filter: PLANT Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station EVENT DATE September 22, 2006 RESPONSIBLE BRANCH CHIEF Troy Pruett - Greg Werner Acting EVALUATION DATE September 26, 2006 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SIGNIFICANT OPERATIONAL EVENT OR DEGRADED CONDITION On July 25, 2006, Unit 3, Train A, EDG failed to develop output voltage during a surveillance test. The licensee's root cause determined plastic debris potentially prevented auxiliary contacts from properly functioning resulting in shorting out the generator field during startup preventing a proper field flash. Two replacement relays obtained from the licensee warehouse exhibited the same degraded condition. A third relay was satisfactorily tested and installed. The diesel was subsequently tested and declared operable on July 26, 2006.
The diesel was subse quently tested and decla red operable on July 26, 2006.
On September 22, 2006, Unit 3, Train A, EDG failed to develop output voltage during a surveillance test. The licensee determined the same auxiliary contact resulting in the previous failures was faulty. The licensee identified that this failure was attributed to a bent metal actuator arm that is used to actuate the auxiliary contacts associated with the field shorting circuit. Additionally, the licensee determined that this bent metal actuator arm exists in all six EDG's at the facility. Based on previous failures identified in July it appears this bent arm is the underlying root cause for the field shorting auxiliary contacts failure to operate reliably and this condition is transportable to all operating EDG's at the facility. During original plant construction a vendor representative straighten out the K1 relay arms.
On Se ptem ber 2 2, 20 06, U nit 3, Tra in A , ED G fai led to d eve lop outp ut v olta ge du ring a surveill ance test. The l icensee dete rmined the same auxili ary contact re sulting in th e previous failures wa s faulty. The l icensee id entified that thi s failure w as attributed to a bent metal actuator arm that is used to actuate the auxiliary contacts associated with the field shorti ng circ uit. A dditi onall y, the lice nsee d etermi ned th at thi s bent metal actuat or arm e xist s in all s ix EDG's a t the facility. Based on previous failures iden tified in Jul y it appe ars this bent arm is the un derly ing roo t cause for the field shorti ng aux ilia ry co ntacts failur e to op erate reliably and this co ndition i s transportable to all op erating EDG's at the facility.
However, the spares in the warehouse still had bent arms.
During origin al pl ant co nstruct ion a vend or repr esenta tive strai ghten o ut the K1 rel ay ar ms. Howe ver, t he spa res in the w arehou se sti ll ha d bent arms. Origina lly , the K 1 rela y had a spa re set of conta cts. The vend or had bent t he tw o spar e contactor arms back si nce they w ere not to be used. The li censee then d ecided to us e the contacts to short out the generator fiel d when th e diesel was secure
Originally, the K1 relay had a spare set of contacts. The vendor had bent the two spare contactor arms back since they were not to be used. The licensee then decided to use the contacts to short out the generator field when the diesel was secured. During original plant construction, the licensee wired the contacts to short out the generator field. However, when the diesel was started for routine testing, the contacts inadvertently operated to short out the generator field. This prevented the generator from developing an output voltage.
: d. During ori ginal plant construction, the licensee wired the contacts to sho rt out the generator fie ld. How ever, wh en the diesel was started for routine testing, the contacts ina dvertently operated to sh ort out the generat or fiel d. Thi s prev ented the gen erator from dev elopi ng an o utput v oltage. Follow ing the July 2006 failure, the license e replaced th e K1 relay with w arehouse spare s at that time. These a re the relay s that failed o n September 22, 2006. An N RC inspecto r looked at the remaining spare.
Following the July 2006 failure, the licensee replaced the K1 relay with warehouse spares at that time. These are the relays that failed on September 22, 2006. An NRC inspector looked at the remaining spare. The spare contact arms on those relays were also bent back. This calls into question the reliability and operabilty of the six EDGs for the three Palo Verde units.
The spare contact arms on tho se relays were also bent back. This call s into questi on the reli abil ity a nd ope rabil ty of th e six EDGs fo r the th ree Pa lo Ve rde un its. This could a lso affect the reli ability and operabi lity of any other relay s that this v endor supplied to the nuc lear indus try. Y/N DETERMIN ISTIC CRITE RIA    N a. Involv ed operations that exceeded , or were not in, the de sign basis of the facility Remarks-       Y b. Involv ed a major d eficiency in design, con struction, or ope ration having potential generic safety implications Remarks-The defective sp are relays could affect operabi lty of all the Palo V erde Emergency Die sel Generators.
This could also affect the reliability and operability of any other relays that this vendor supplied to the nuclear industry.
N c. Led to a significant loss o f integrity of the fuel, primary coolant press ure boundary , or primary containment bou ndary o f a nuclear rea ctor - significant loss applies to each bounda ry Remarks-     N d. Led to the loss o f a saf ety functi on or multiple failure s in sy stems u sed to mitigate an actual event Remarks-     Y e. Involv ed possible a dverse ge neric implications Remarks-This could a ffect Emergency Diesel Generators at othe r nuclear pow er plant s    N f. Involv ed significant un expected sy stem interactions Remarks-     Y g. Involv ed repetitive failures or ev ents involv ing safety-related equipment or deficiencies in operations Remarks-There w as a l east o ne oth er fail ure w ith th e same sympto ms in 2 006.     N h. Involv ed questions or concerns pertaining to lice nsee operation al performance Remarks-     N x. Inv olved one o r more of the radiolo gical o r mater ials cr iterion prov ided in MD 8.3 guidance Remarks-ENCLOSURE 1 CONDITIONAL RISK A SSESSMENT IF IT IS DET ERMINE D TH AT A RISK AN AL YSIS I S NOT REQUI RED - ENTE R NA BELOW AND CONTINUE T O THE DECISION BASIS BLOCK RISK ANA LYSIS BY-D. Passehl DA TE-September 26, 20 06 Brief d escrip tion fo r the b asis o f the a ssess ment: The risk analy st's review considered the impact of the U nit 3 "A" ED G inoperable. Because the EDG failed in a simil ar fashion on Ju ly 25, 20 06, the risk anal yst performed a co ndition risk as sessme nt assu ming a d uratio n of 59 days (7/25 - 9/22/2006). The r isk a nal yst use d the Pal o Ve rde 1 , 2 & 3 Re vis ion 3P S PAR Mo del Lev el 1 , Ch ange 3.21, c reated Octobe r 2005. NRC E valu ation (Cond ition Asses sment): The foll owi ng basi c eve nt wa s set to "True" (alw ays fai led):  EPS-D GN-FS-D GA (Di esel Generat or A Fa ils t o Start)Settin g this b asic e vent to "True" appro priate ly a djusts the co mmon ca use fai lure t o start probability for the other EDGs as well.
Y/N DETERMINISTIC CRITERIA N
NRC R esult: CCDP = 7.4 x 10-5/yr x (59/36 5) = 1.2 x 10-5 The thre shold for ini tiati ng a spe cial insp ectio n is C CDP o f >1E-6. THE ESTIMATED CONDITIONAL CORE DAMAGE FREQUENCY (CCD P) IS 1.2 x 10-5 WHICH PLA CES THE R ISK IN TH E RANG E OF A Special INSPECTION PROCEDURE
: a. Involved operations that exceeded, or were not in, the design basis of the facility Remarks-Y
.
: b. Involved a major deficiency in design, construction, or operation having potential generic safety implications Remarks-The defective spare relays could affect operabilty of all the Palo Verde Emergency Diesel Generators.
ENCLOSURE 1 RESPONSE DECISION AN D BASIS USING THE AB OVE IN FORMA TION A ND OT HER K EY EL EMENT S OF CO NSIDE RA TION AS A PPROP RIA TE, D OCUMEN T T HE RE SPONS E DEC ISION T O THE EVEN T OR CONDIT ION, A ND T HE BA SIS FOR THA T DE CISION Response to the event or condition Conduct a spe cial insp ection at Pa lo Verde to ascertain the extent of the relay failu res and desi gn problems.
N
BASIS FOR THE RE SPONSE Based on the CCDP eval uatio n, MD 8.3 cr iteri a, and poten tial for die sel fai lures due to generic relay failures, a spe cial insp ection is w arranted to determi ne the significa nce and exten t of cond ition. COMPLETED BY Francis L. Bru sh /R A/DATE September 28, 2006 BRANCH CHIEF REVIEW Greg Werner
: c. Led to a significant loss of integrity of the fuel, primary coolant pressure boundary, or primary containment boundary of a nuclear reactor - significant loss applies to each boundary Remarks-N
/R A/DATE September 28, 2006 DIVISI ON DIR ECTO R APP RO VAL Anton (Tony) Vegel for /R A/DATE September 28, 2006 September 29, 20 06 MEMOR ANDUM TO:  Bruce S. M allett, Region al Admini strator FROM: Greg Werner, Ac ting Ch ief, Pro ject Br anch B ,  /R A/         
: d. Led to the loss of a safety function or multiple failures in systems used to mitigate an actual event Remarks-Y
: e. Involved possible adverse generic implications Remarks-This could affect Emergency Diesel Generators at other nuclear power plants N
: f. Involved significant unexpected system interactions Remarks-Y
: g. Involved repetitive failures or events involving safety-related equipment or deficiencies in operations Remarks-There was a least one other failure with the same symptoms in 2006.
N
: h. Involved questions or concerns pertaining to licensee operational performance Remarks-N
: x. Involved one or more of the radiological or materials criterion provided in MD 8.3 guidance Remarks-


Di visi on Rea ctor Pr ojects SUB JEC T: MAN AGEM ENT DIR ECTIVE 8.3 EV ALUATI ON FOR PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION (PV 06-19)Pursuant to Re gional Office Poli cy Guide 0 801, "Documenti ng Management Directive 8.3 Reactiv e Team Inspection Decision s," the enclose d table prov ides the Management Di rective 8.3 evaluati on for determining tha t a special inspection will be conducted at the Palo Verde Nucle ar Generating Stati on, Unit 3, for the failure of Emergency Diesel Generat or 3A t o dev elop an out put v oltage whe n start ed for a surv eill ance t est.
ENCLOSURE 1 CONDITIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT IF IT IS DETERMINED THAT A RISK ANALYSIS IS NOT REQUIRED - ENTER NA BELOW AND CONTINUE TO THE DECISION BASIS BLOCK RISK ANALYSIS BY-D. Passehl DATE-September 26, 2006 Brief description for the basis of the assessment:
The risk analyst's review considered the impact of the Unit 3 "A" EDG inoperable. Because the EDG failed in a similar fashion on July 25, 2006, the risk analyst performed a condition risk assessment assuming a duration of 59 days (7/25 - 9/22/2006).
The risk analyst used the Palo Verde 1, 2 & 3 Revision 3P SPAR Model Level 1, Change 3.21, created October 2005.
NRC Evaluation (Condition Assessment):
The following basic event was set to "True" (always failed):
EPS-DGN-FS-DGA (Diesel Generator A Fails to Start)
Setting this basic event to True appropriately adjusts the common cause failure to start probability for the other EDGs as well.
NRC Result:
CCDP = 7.4 x 10-5/yr x (59/365) = 1.2 x 10-5 The threshold for initiating a special inspection is CCDP of >1E-6.
THE ESTIMATED CONDITIONAL CORE DAMAGE FREQUENCY (CCDP) IS 1.2 x 10-5 WHICH PLACES THE RISK IN THE RANGE OF A Special INSPECTION PROCEDURE.
 
ENCLOSURE 1 RESPONSE DECISION AND BASIS USING THE ABOVE INFORMATION AND OTHER KEY ELEMENTS OF CONSIDERATION AS APPROPRIATE, DOCUMENT THE RESPONSE DECISION TO THE EVENT OR CONDITION, AND THE BASIS FOR THAT DECISION Response to the event or condition Conduct a special inspection at Palo Verde to ascertain the extent of the relay failures and design problems.
BASIS FOR THE RESPONSE Based on the CCDP evaluation, MD 8.3 criteria, and potential for diesel failures due to generic relay failures, a special inspection is warranted to determine the significance and extent of condition.
COMPLETED BY Francis L. Brush /RA/
DATE September 28, 2006 BRANCH CHIEF REVIEW Greg Werner /RA/
DATE September 28, 2006 DIVISION DIRECTOR APPROVAL Anton (Tony) Vegel for /RA/
DATE September 28, 2006
 
September 29, 2006 MEMORANDUM TO: Bruce S. Mallett, Regional Administrator FROM:
Greg Werner, Acting Chief, Project Branch B, /RA/
Division Reactor Projects
 
==SUBJECT:==
MANAGEMENT DIRECTIVE 8.3 EVALUATION FOR PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION (PV 06-19)
Pursuant to Regional Office Policy Guide 0801, "Documenting Management Directive 8.3 Reactive Team Inspection Decisions," the enclosed table provides the Management Directive 8.3 evaluation for determining that a special inspection will be conducted at the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 3, for the failure of Emergency Diesel Generator 3A to develop an output voltage when started for a surveillance test.


==Enclosure:==
==Enclosure:==
MD 8.3 Decision Documentation Form cc w/Enclosure via e-mail:
T. Gwynn, DRA A. Howell, D/DRP D. Chamberlain, D/DRS M. Herrera, DRMA G. Warnick, SRI P. Benvenuto, RI J. Melfi, RI M. Fields, NRR


MD 8.3 Dec isio n Docu mentati on For m cc w/Enclosure via e-mail:
Bruce S. Mallett SUNSI Review Completed: _FLB__ ADAMS: X Yes G No Initials: __FLB_
T. Gwynn, DRA A. Howell, D/DRP D. Chamberlain, D/DRS M. Her rer a, DRMA G. W arnick, SRI P. Benvenuto, RI J. Melfi, RI M. Fields, NRR Bruce S. Ma llett-2-SUNSI Review Completed: _FLB_
G Publicly Available X Non-Publicly Available G Sensitive G Non-Sensitive R:\\_MD 8.3 Decisions\\2006\\PV-06-019.wpd ML062720120 RIV:SPE:DRP\\D AC:DRP/B SRA:DRS D:DRS D:DRP FLBrush;mjs GEWerner DPassehl DDChamberlain ATHowell
_ADAM S: X Yes G No Initials: __
/RA/
FLB_ G   Publi cly Av ailable      X Non-Publi cly Av ailable      G   Sensitive G   Non-Sensit ive R:\_MD 8.3 Decision s\2006\PV-06-019.wpd           M L062720120 RIV:SP E:DRP\D AC:DR P/B SRA:DRS D:DRS D:DRP FLBrus h;mjs GEWerner DPassehl DDChamberlain ATHowell/RA//RA//RA/RCaniano for AVegel   for 9/28/06 9/28/06 9/28/06 9/29/06 9/29/06 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY T=Telephone E=E-mai l        F=Fax}}
/RA/
/RA/
RCaniano for AVegel for 9/28/06 9/28/06 9/28/06 9/29/06 9/29/06 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY T=Telephone E=E-mail F=Fax}}

Latest revision as of 06:22, 15 January 2025

Management Directive 8.3 Evaluation for Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station (PV 06-19)
ML062720120
Person / Time
Site: Palo Verde 
Issue date: 09/29/2006
From: Greg Werner
NRC/RGN-IV/DRP/RPB-B
To: Mallett B
Region 4 Administrator
References
Management Directive 8.3
Download: ML062720120 (6)


Text

PLANT Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station EVENT DATE September 22, 2006 RESPONSIBLE BRANCH CHIEF Troy Pruett - Greg Werner Acting EVALUATION DATE September 26, 2006 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SIGNIFICANT OPERATIONAL EVENT OR DEGRADED CONDITION On July 25, 2006, Unit 3, Train A, EDG failed to develop output voltage during a surveillance test. The licensee's root cause determined plastic debris potentially prevented auxiliary contacts from properly functioning resulting in shorting out the generator field during startup preventing a proper field flash. Two replacement relays obtained from the licensee warehouse exhibited the same degraded condition. A third relay was satisfactorily tested and installed. The diesel was subsequently tested and declared operable on July 26, 2006.

On September 22, 2006, Unit 3, Train A, EDG failed to develop output voltage during a surveillance test. The licensee determined the same auxiliary contact resulting in the previous failures was faulty. The licensee identified that this failure was attributed to a bent metal actuator arm that is used to actuate the auxiliary contacts associated with the field shorting circuit. Additionally, the licensee determined that this bent metal actuator arm exists in all six EDG's at the facility. Based on previous failures identified in July it appears this bent arm is the underlying root cause for the field shorting auxiliary contacts failure to operate reliably and this condition is transportable to all operating EDG's at the facility. During original plant construction a vendor representative straighten out the K1 relay arms.

However, the spares in the warehouse still had bent arms.

Originally, the K1 relay had a spare set of contacts. The vendor had bent the two spare contactor arms back since they were not to be used. The licensee then decided to use the contacts to short out the generator field when the diesel was secured. During original plant construction, the licensee wired the contacts to short out the generator field. However, when the diesel was started for routine testing, the contacts inadvertently operated to short out the generator field. This prevented the generator from developing an output voltage.

Following the July 2006 failure, the licensee replaced the K1 relay with warehouse spares at that time. These are the relays that failed on September 22, 2006. An NRC inspector looked at the remaining spare. The spare contact arms on those relays were also bent back. This calls into question the reliability and operabilty of the six EDGs for the three Palo Verde units.

This could also affect the reliability and operability of any other relays that this vendor supplied to the nuclear industry.

Y/N DETERMINISTIC CRITERIA N

a. Involved operations that exceeded, or were not in, the design basis of the facility Remarks-Y
b. Involved a major deficiency in design, construction, or operation having potential generic safety implications Remarks-The defective spare relays could affect operabilty of all the Palo Verde Emergency Diesel Generators.

N

c. Led to a significant loss of integrity of the fuel, primary coolant pressure boundary, or primary containment boundary of a nuclear reactor - significant loss applies to each boundary Remarks-N
d. Led to the loss of a safety function or multiple failures in systems used to mitigate an actual event Remarks-Y
e. Involved possible adverse generic implications Remarks-This could affect Emergency Diesel Generators at other nuclear power plants N
f. Involved significant unexpected system interactions Remarks-Y
g. Involved repetitive failures or events involving safety-related equipment or deficiencies in operations Remarks-There was a least one other failure with the same symptoms in 2006.

N

h. Involved questions or concerns pertaining to licensee operational performance Remarks-N
x. Involved one or more of the radiological or materials criterion provided in MD 8.3 guidance Remarks-

ENCLOSURE 1 CONDITIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT IF IT IS DETERMINED THAT A RISK ANALYSIS IS NOT REQUIRED - ENTER NA BELOW AND CONTINUE TO THE DECISION BASIS BLOCK RISK ANALYSIS BY-D. Passehl DATE-September 26, 2006 Brief description for the basis of the assessment:

The risk analyst's review considered the impact of the Unit 3 "A" EDG inoperable. Because the EDG failed in a similar fashion on July 25, 2006, the risk analyst performed a condition risk assessment assuming a duration of 59 days (7/25 - 9/22/2006).

The risk analyst used the Palo Verde 1, 2 & 3 Revision 3P SPAR Model Level 1, Change 3.21, created October 2005.

NRC Evaluation (Condition Assessment):

The following basic event was set to "True" (always failed):

EPS-DGN-FS-DGA (Diesel Generator A Fails to Start)

Setting this basic event to True appropriately adjusts the common cause failure to start probability for the other EDGs as well.

NRC Result:

CCDP = 7.4 x 10-5/yr x (59/365) = 1.2 x 10-5 The threshold for initiating a special inspection is CCDP of >1E-6.

THE ESTIMATED CONDITIONAL CORE DAMAGE FREQUENCY (CCDP) IS 1.2 x 10-5 WHICH PLACES THE RISK IN THE RANGE OF A Special INSPECTION PROCEDURE.

ENCLOSURE 1 RESPONSE DECISION AND BASIS USING THE ABOVE INFORMATION AND OTHER KEY ELEMENTS OF CONSIDERATION AS APPROPRIATE, DOCUMENT THE RESPONSE DECISION TO THE EVENT OR CONDITION, AND THE BASIS FOR THAT DECISION Response to the event or condition Conduct a special inspection at Palo Verde to ascertain the extent of the relay failures and design problems.

BASIS FOR THE RESPONSE Based on the CCDP evaluation, MD 8.3 criteria, and potential for diesel failures due to generic relay failures, a special inspection is warranted to determine the significance and extent of condition.

COMPLETED BY Francis L. Brush /RA/

DATE September 28, 2006 BRANCH CHIEF REVIEW Greg Werner /RA/

DATE September 28, 2006 DIVISION DIRECTOR APPROVAL Anton (Tony) Vegel for /RA/

DATE September 28, 2006

September 29, 2006 MEMORANDUM TO: Bruce S. Mallett, Regional Administrator FROM:

Greg Werner, Acting Chief, Project Branch B, /RA/

Division Reactor Projects

SUBJECT:

MANAGEMENT DIRECTIVE 8.3 EVALUATION FOR PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION (PV 06-19)

Pursuant to Regional Office Policy Guide 0801, "Documenting Management Directive 8.3 Reactive Team Inspection Decisions," the enclosed table provides the Management Directive 8.3 evaluation for determining that a special inspection will be conducted at the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 3, for the failure of Emergency Diesel Generator 3A to develop an output voltage when started for a surveillance test.

Enclosure:

MD 8.3 Decision Documentation Form cc w/Enclosure via e-mail:

T. Gwynn, DRA A. Howell, D/DRP D. Chamberlain, D/DRS M. Herrera, DRMA G. Warnick, SRI P. Benvenuto, RI J. Melfi, RI M. Fields, NRR

Bruce S. Mallett SUNSI Review Completed: _FLB__ ADAMS: X Yes G No Initials: __FLB_

G Publicly Available X Non-Publicly Available G Sensitive G Non-Sensitive R:\\_MD 8.3 Decisions\\2006\\PV-06-019.wpd ML062720120 RIV:SPE:DRP\\D AC:DRP/B SRA:DRS D:DRS D:DRP FLBrush;mjs GEWerner DPassehl DDChamberlain ATHowell

/RA/

/RA/

/RA/

RCaniano for AVegel for 9/28/06 9/28/06 9/28/06 9/29/06 9/29/06 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY T=Telephone E=E-mail F=Fax