ML110140849: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 01/14/2011
| issue date = 01/14/2011
| title = Acceptance Review Email, License Amendment Request to Add New Surveillance Requirement 3.3.8.6 to Technical Specification 3.3.8, Emergency Exhaust System (EES) Actuation Instrumentation
| title = Acceptance Review Email, License Amendment Request to Add New Surveillance Requirement 3.3.8.6 to Technical Specification 3.3.8, Emergency Exhaust System (EES) Actuation Instrumentation
| author name = Polickoski J T
| author name = Polickoski J
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIV
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIV
| addressee name = Elwood T B, Maglio S A
| addressee name = Elwood T, Maglio S
| addressee affiliation = Union Electric Co
| addressee affiliation = Union Electric Co
| docket = 05000483
| docket = 05000483
| license number = NPF-030
| license number = NPF-030
| contact person = Polickoski J T, NRR/DORL/LPL4, 415-5430
| contact person = Polickoski J, NRR/DORL/LPL4, 415-5430
| case reference number = TAC ME5173
| case reference number = TAC ME5173
| document type = Acceptance Review Letter, E-Mail
| document type = Acceptance Review Letter, E-Mail
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:From: Polickoski, James Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 4:28 PM To: Maglio, Scott A; Elwood, Thomas B Cc: Lent, Susan; Lingam, Siva; Thadani, Mohan; Markley, Michael; Burkhardt, Janet  
{{#Wiki_filter:From:
Polickoski, James Sent:
Friday, January 14, 2011 4:28 PM To:
Maglio, Scott A; Elwood, Thomas B Cc:
Lent, Susan; Lingam, Siva; Thadani, Mohan; Markley, Michael; Burkhardt, Janet  


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Line 24: Line 28:


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
CALLAWAY PLANT, UNIT 1 - RE: AMENDMENT TO ADD NEW SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENT (SR) 3.3.8.6 TO TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION (TS) 3.3.8, "EMERGENCY EXHAUST SYSTEM (EES) ACTUATION         INSTRUMENTATION." (TAC NO. ME5173)  
CALLAWAY PLANT, UNIT 1 - RE: AMENDMENT TO ADD NEW SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENT (SR) 3.3.8.6 TO TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION (TS) 3.3.8, "EMERGENCY EXHAUST SYSTEM (EES) ACTUATION INSTRUMENTATION." (TAC NO. ME5173)
 
By {{letter dated|date=December 10, 2010|text=letter dated December 10, 2010}}, (ADAMS Accession No. ML103470204), Union Electric Company (the licensee) submitted a license amendment for Callaway Plant, Unit 1 requesting the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs approval of an amendment to add new Surveillance Requirement (SR) 3.3.8.6 to Technical Specification (TS) 3.3.8, "Emergency Exhaust System (EES) Actuation Instrumentation."
By letter dated December 10, 2010, (ADAMS Accession No. ML103470204), Union Electric Company (the licensee) submitted a license amendment for Callaway Plant, Unit 1 requesting the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's approval of an amendment to add new Surveillance Requirement (SR) 3.3.8.6 to Technical Specification (TS) 3.3.8, "Emergency Exhaust System (EES) Actuation Instrumentation."
The purpose of this email is to provide the results of the NRC staffs acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The purpose of this email is to provide the results of the NRC staff's acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed license amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed for the NRC staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed license amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed for the NRC staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-5430 or email:
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-5430 or email:
james.polickoski@nrc.gov.
james.polickoski@nrc.gov.
Sincerely, James T. Polickoski Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch IV Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (301) 415-5430     james.polickoski@nrc.gov}}
Sincerely, James T. Polickoski Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch IV Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (301) 415-5430 james.polickoski@nrc.gov}}

Latest revision as of 00:28, 14 January 2025

Acceptance Review Email, License Amendment Request to Add New Surveillance Requirement 3.3.8.6 to Technical Specification 3.3.8, Emergency Exhaust System (EES) Actuation Instrumentation
ML110140849
Person / Time
Site: Callaway Ameren icon.png
Issue date: 01/14/2011
From: Polickoski J
Plant Licensing Branch IV
To: Elwood T, Maglio S
Union Electric Co
Polickoski J, NRR/DORL/LPL4, 415-5430
References
TAC ME5173
Download: ML110140849 (1)


Text

From:

Polickoski, James Sent:

Friday, January 14, 2011 4:28 PM To:

Maglio, Scott A; Elwood, Thomas B Cc:

Lent, Susan; Lingam, Siva; Thadani, Mohan; Markley, Michael; Burkhardt, Janet

Subject:

Acceptance Review for Amendment Request Dated 12/10/2010-ME5173 January 14, 2011

SUBJECT:

CALLAWAY PLANT, UNIT 1 - RE: AMENDMENT TO ADD NEW SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENT (SR) 3.3.8.6 TO TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION (TS) 3.3.8, "EMERGENCY EXHAUST SYSTEM (EES) ACTUATION INSTRUMENTATION." (TAC NO. ME5173)

By letter dated December 10, 2010, (ADAMS Accession No. ML103470204), Union Electric Company (the licensee) submitted a license amendment for Callaway Plant, Unit 1 requesting the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs approval of an amendment to add new Surveillance Requirement (SR) 3.3.8.6 to Technical Specification (TS) 3.3.8, "Emergency Exhaust System (EES) Actuation Instrumentation."

The purpose of this email is to provide the results of the NRC staffs acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed license amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed for the NRC staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence.

If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-5430 or email:

james.polickoski@nrc.gov.

Sincerely, James T. Polickoski Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch IV Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (301) 415-5430 james.polickoski@nrc.gov