|
|
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
| Line 3: |
Line 3: |
| | issue date = 01/31/2013 | | | issue date = 01/31/2013 |
| | title = Fourth Ten-Year Inservice Inspection Plan, Request for Relief No. 12-ON-001 | | | title = Fourth Ten-Year Inservice Inspection Plan, Request for Relief No. 12-ON-001 |
| | author name = Gillespie T P | | | author name = Gillespie T |
| | author affiliation = Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC | | | author affiliation = Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC |
| | addressee name = | | | addressee name = |
| Line 15: |
Line 15: |
|
| |
|
| =Text= | | =Text= |
| {{#Wiki_filter:Duke T. PRESTON GILLESPIE, JR.Duke Vice President PoEnergy Oconee Nuclear Station Duke Energy ONO0 VP / 7800 Rochester Hwy.January 31, 2013 Seneca, SC 29672 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 864-873-4478 Document Control Desk 864-873-4208 fax T. Gillespie@duke-energy. | | {{#Wiki_filter:}} |
| corn Washington, DC 20555
| |
| | |
| ==Subject:==
| |
| Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC Oconee Nuclear Station Unit 1 Docket No. 50-269 Fourth Ten-Year Inservice Inspection Plan Request for Relief No. 12-ON-001 Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(5)(iii), attached is a Request for Relief from the requirement to examine 100% of the volume specified by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (ASME Code), Section Xl, Rules for Inservice Inspection of Nuclear Power Plant Components, 1998 Edition with 2000 Addenda (as modified by Code Case N-460).The attached Request for Relief 127ON-001 is to allow Duke Energy to take credit for the enclosed Table 1 list of limited ultrasonic examinations on welds associated with various systems and components during Unit 1 EOC26 refueling outage. The ultrasonic examination coverage of the subject Unit 1 welds did not meet the 90% examination requirements of Code Case N-460. The obtainable volume coverage for weld examination is indicated on Attachment A of the relief request. Achievement of greater examination coverage for these welds is impractical due to piping/valve geometry and interferences.
| |
| Therefore, Duke Energy requests that the NRC grant relief as authorized under 10 CFR 50.55(g)(6)(i).
| |
| This submittal document contains no regulatory commitments.
| |
| If there are any questions or further information is needed you may contact Corey Gray at (864)-873-6325.
| |
| Sincerely, T. Preston Gillespie Jr., Site Vice President
| |
| | |
| ==Enclosure:==
| |
| | |
| Oconee Nuclear Station -Unit 1 Relief Request 12-ON-001 www.duke-energy.
| |
| corn U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission January 31, 2013 Page 2 Xc w/att: Victor Mcree Region II Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Marquis One Tower 245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200 Atlanta, GA 30303-1257 John Boska Project Manager (by electronic mail only)U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 11555 Rockville Pike Mail Stop O-8G9A Rockville, MD 20852-2746 Xc w/o attachment NRC Senior Resident Inspector Oconee Nuclear Station Susan Jenkins Section Manager Division of Waste Management Bureau of Land and Waste Management SC Dept. of Health & Environment Control 2600 Bull St.Columbia, SC 29201 Enclosure Oconee Nuclear Station -Unit 1 Relief Request 12-ON-001 Oconee Relief Request 12-ON-001 1.0 Scope of Relief Request Relief is requested pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(5)(iii) for welds listed in Table 1.These welds were required to be examined in accordance with Inservice Inspection Plans for the following Units.Oconee Nuclear Station -Unit 1 Fourth 10-Year Inservice Inspection Interval Interval Start Date: January 01, 2004 Table 1 Relief Oconee Examinati Weld ID Item/Summary Examination Request Unit on Number Number Data Section Number Performed Number (Refueling Outa qe)2.0 1 1EOC26 1-PZR-WP26-3 O1.B3.110.0011 See Attachment A Pages 1-10 3.0 1 1EOC26 1-PZR-WP26-7 O1.B3.110.0012 See Attachment A Pages 11-20 4.0 1 1 EOC26 1-PIB1-9 O1..B9.11.0029 See Attachment A Pages 21-32 5.0 1 1 EOC26 1-PDBl-1 O1..B9.11.0072 See Attachment A Pages 33-44 6.0 1 1EOC26 lLP-128-80 O1.C5.11.0029 See Attachment A Pages 45-51 7.0 1 1EOC26 1LP-209-17 O1.C5.11.0084 See Attachment A Pages 52-57 8.0 1 1 EOC26 1 LP-209-18 O1.C5.11.0085 See Attachment A Pages 58-63 9.0 1 1 EOC26 1HP-192-15 O1.C5.21.0006 See Attachment A Pages 64-72 10.0 1 1 EOC26 1-51A-01-91A O1.C5.21.0024 See Attachment A Pages 73-78 Page 1 of 55 Oconee Relief Request 12-ON-001 11.0 1 1 EOC26 1 HP-324-118B 01.C5.21.0041 See Attachment A Pages 79-84 12.0 1 1 EOC26 1-51A-02-34B 01.C5.21.0053 See Attachment A Pages 85-91 13.0 1 1EOC26 1HP-193-12 O1.C5.21.0057 See Attachment A Pages 92-98 14.0 1 1 EOC26 1-51A-01-103A O1.C5.21.0066 See Attachment A Pages 99-106 15.0 1 1 EOC26 1 LPS-563-14 O1.C5.51.0050 See Attachment A Pages 107-115 16.0 1 1 EOC26 1 LPS-702-50 O1.C5.51.0053 See Attachment A Pages 116-124 17.0 1 1 EOC26 WJ-32 PSI See Attachment A Pages 125-133 18.0 1 1EOC26 WJ-33 PSI See Attachment A Pages 134-144 19.0 1 1 EOC26 WJ-35 PSI See Attachment A Pages 145-153 20.0 1 1 EOC26 WJ-36 PSI See Attachment A Pages 154-162 Duke Energy procedures require ASME Code, Section XI examinations that do not meet the requirements of Code Case N-460 to be marked "reject" for tracking purposes, regardless of whether indications were noted. Therefore, the limited exams in 12-ON-001 without indications were marked "reject".Page 2 of 55 Oconee Relief Request 12-ON-001 2.0 Weld #1-PZR-WP26-3 2.1. ASME Code Component(s)
| |
| Affected Unit 1 Pressurizer Heater Belt Shell to Sampling Nozzle Weld #1-PZR-WP26-3, Summary Number 01 .B3.110.0011 and ASME Code Class 1.2.2. Applicable Code Edition and Addenda ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section XI, 1998 Edition through the 2000 Addenda.2.3. Applicable Code Requirement IWB-2500, Table IWB-2500-1, Examination Category B-D, Item Number B3.1 10 Fig. IWB-2500-7 (a), 100% Volume Coverage of Examination Volume A-B-C-D-E-F-G-H-I.
| |
| 2.4. Impracticality of Compliance Component configuration:
| |
| * Surface 1: Shell -Carbon steel* Surface 2: Sampling nozzle -Carbon steel* Diameter:
| |
| 5.750 in.* Thickness:
| |
| 6.187 in.This component was scanned manually with conventional methods. Scanning requirements are described in ASME Section V, Article 4, T-441.1.2(a),T-441.1.3, T-441.1.4, T-441.1.5 and T-441.1.6.
| |
| These requirements describe and are specific to scanning components in two axial and two circumferential directions.
| |
| This component was scanned to the extent possible to meet these requirements.
| |
| The aggregate coverage that was obtained is described and calculated from the following:
| |
| * Weld coverage using 450& 600 shear waves for axial scans (S1, S2), and 450 & 600 shear waves for circumferential scans (CW, CCW) obtained 15.4% coverage.* Base material coverage using 450& 600 shear wave for axial scans (51)and 450& 600 shear waves for circumferential scans (CW, CCW) obtained 54.8% coverage.* 00 scan coverage obtained 33.8% coverage.* The aggregate coverage was calculated to be (15.4% + 54.8% + 33.8%)/3 = 34.7%.The impracticality was caused by the weld taper configuration of the sampling nozzle to the shell that does not allow meaningful interrogation from Surface 2, the sampling nozzle side. In order to scan all of the required volume for this weld, the shell to sampling nozzle weld would have to be redesigned or replaced to allow scanning from both sides of the weld, which is impractical.
| |
| Page 3 of 55 Oconee Relief Request 12-ON-001 The Oconee Inservice Inspection Plan allows the use of Code Case N-460, which requires greater than 90% volumetric coverage.
| |
| The achieved coverage did not meet the acceptance criteria of this Code Case.This relief request is specific to examination volume coverage limitations only. All other Code requirements were satisfied.
| |
| No indications were recorded during this examination.
| |
| The reject box on the UT Calibration/Examination sheet is marked for internal tracking of the coverage limitation only.2.5. Proposed Alternative and Basis for Use No substitution alternative for this weld is available which would provide better coverage.
| |
| Radiography (RT) is not a desired option because RT is limited in the ability to detect service induced flaws. Use of other manual or automated UT techniques, whether conventional or phased array, were considered, but would not increase coverage due to the limitation created by the component configuration.
| |
| The use of any other UT technique available would incur the same physical scanning limitations.
| |
| 2.6. Duration of Proposed Alternative This request is for the duration of the fourth inservice inspection interval, currently scheduled to end on July 15, 2014.2.7. Justification for Granting Relief Ultrasonic examination of the weld for the item number 01 .B3.110.0011 was conducted using personnel, equipment, and procedures qualified in accordance with ASME Section XI, 1998 Edition with the 2000 Addenda.The system leakage test performed each refueling outage in accordance with Table IWB-2500-1, Examination Category B-P requires a VT-2 visual examination to detect evidence of leakage. This test and VT-2 examination provides additional assurance of pressure boundary integrity.
| |
| In addition to the above Code required examinations (volumetric and pressure test), Reactor Building Normal Sump monitoring and other leakage detection systems provide additional assurance that, in the event that leakage did occur through this weld, it would be detected and proper action taken.Duke Energy has examined the weld to the maximum extent possible utilizing approved examination techniques and equipment.
| |
| Based on the acceptable results for the coverage completed by the volumetric examination, the pressure testing (VT-2) examinations required by Section XI, and the leakage monitoring, it is Duke Energy's position that the combination of examinations provides a reasonable assurance of quality and safety.Page 4 of 55 Oconee Relief Request 12-ON-001 2.8. References Duke Energy Relief Request 04-ON-005 was approved by the NRC during the last inspection interval.
| |
| The previous approved SE is documented in Accession Number ML050340377, TAC No.MC4527 dated March 8, 2005.Page 5 of 55 Oconee Relief Request 12-ON-001 3.0 Weld #1-PZR-WP26-7 3.1. ASME Code Component(s)
| |
| Affected Unit 1 Pressurizer Heater Belt Shell to Sampling Nozzle Weld #1-PZR-WP26-7, Summary Number 01 .B3.110.0012, and ASME Code Class 1.3.2. Applicable Code Edition and Addenda ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section XI, 1998 Edition through the 2000 Addenda.3.3. Applicable Code Requirement IWB-2500, Table IWB-2500-1, Examination Category B-D, Item Number B3.110 Fig. IWB-2500-7 (a), 100% Volume Coverage of Examination Volume A-B-C-D-E-F-G-H-I.
| |
| 3.4. Impracticality of Compliance Component configuration:
| |
| * Surface 1: Shell -Carbon steel* Surface 2: Sampling nozzle -Carbon steel* Diameter:
| |
| 5.750 in.* Thickness:
| |
| 6.187 in.This component was scanned manually with conventional methods. Scanning requirements are described in ASME Section V, Article 4, T-441.1.2(a), T-441.1.3, T-441.1.4, T-441.1.5 and T-441.1.6.
| |
| These requirements describe and are specific to scanning components in two axial and two circumferential directions.
| |
| This component was scanned to the extent possible to meet these requirements.
| |
| The aggregate coverage that was obtained is described and calculated from the following:
| |
| Weld coverage using 450& 600 shear waves for axial scans (S1, S2), and 450 & 600 shear waves for circumferential scans (CW, CCW) obtained 15.4% coverage.Base material coverage using 450& 600 shear wave for axial scans (S1)and 450& 600 shear waves for circumferential scans (CW, CCW) obtained 54.8% coverage.* 00 scan coverage obtained 33.8% coverage.* The aggregate coverage was calculated to be (15.4% + 54.8% + 33.8%)/3 = 34.7%.The impracticality was caused by the weld taper configuration of the sampling nozzle to the shell that does not allow meaningful interrogation from Surface 2, the sampling nozzle side. In order to scan all of the required volume for this weld, the shell to sampling nozzle weld would have to be redesigned or replaced to allow scanning from both sides of the weld, which is impractical.
| |
| Page 6 of 55 Oconee Relief Request 12-ON-001 The Oconee Inservice Inspection Plan allows the use of Code Case N-460, which requires greater than 90% volumetric coverage.
| |
| The achieved coverage did not meet the acceptance criteria of this Code Case.This relief request is specific to examination volume coverage limitations only. All other Code requirements were satisfied.
| |
| No indications were recorded during this examination.
| |
| The reject box on the UT Calibration/Examination sheet is marked for internal tracking of the coverage limitation only.3.5. Proposed Alternative and Basis for Use No substitution alternative for this weld is available which would provide better coverage.
| |
| Radiography (RT) is not a desired option because RT is limited in the ability to detect service induced flaws. Use of other manual or automated UT techniques, whether conventional or phased array, were considered, but would not increase coverage due to the limitation created by the component configuration.
| |
| The use of any other UT technique available would incur the same physical scanning limitations.
| |
| 3.6. Duration of Proposed Alternative This request is for the duration of the fourth inservice inspection interval, currently scheduled to end on July 15, 2014.3.7. Justification for Granting Relief Ultrasonic examination of the weld for the item number 01 .B3.110.00012 was conducted using personnel, equipment, and procedures qualified in accordance with ASME Section XI, 1998 Edition with the 2000 Addenda.The system leakage test performed each refueling outage in accordance with Table IWB-2500-1, Examination Category B-P requires a VT-2 visual examination to detect evidence of leakage. This test and VT-2 examination provides additional assurance of pressure boundary integrity.
| |
| In addition to the above Code required examinations (volumetric and pressure test), Reactor Building Normal Sump monitoring and other leakage detection systems provide additional assurance that, in the event that leakage did occur through this weld, it would be detected and proper action taken.Duke Energy has examined the weld to the maximum extent possible utilizing approved examination techniques and equipment.
| |
| Based on the acceptable results for the coverage completed by the volumetric examination, the pressure testing (VT-2) examinations required by Section XI, and the leakage monitoring, it is Duke Energy's position that the combination of examinations provides a reasonable assurance of quality and safety.Page 7 of 55 Oconee Relief Request 12-ON-001 3.8. References Duke Energy Relief Request 04-ON-005 was approved by the NRC during the last inspection interval.
| |
| The previous approved SE is documented in Accession Number ML050340377, TAC No.MC4527 dated March 8, 2005.Page 8 of 55 Oconee Relief Request 12-ON-001 4.0 Weld #1-PIB1-9 4.1. ASME Code Component(s)
| |
| Affected Unit 1 Reactor Coolant Pump 1 B1 Casing Nozzle to Safe-End Piping Weld, Weld #1-PIB1-9, Summary Number 01 .B9.11.0029 and ASME Code Class 1.4.2. Applicable Code Edition and Addenda ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section XI, 1998 Edition through the 2000 Addenda.4.3. Applicable Code Requirement IWB-2500, Table IWB-2500-1, Examination Category B-J, Item Number B9.11 Figure IWB-2500-8 (c), 100% Volume Coverage of Examination Volume C-D-E-F.4.4. Impracticality of Compliance Component configuration:
| |
| * Surface 1: Cast Stainless Steel Nozzle" Surface 2: Forged Stainless Steel Safe End* NPS: 36.5 in.* Thickness:
| |
| 2.330 in.This component was scanned manually with conventional methods. Scanning requirements are described in 10 CFR 50.55a(b)(2)(xv)(A)(1).
| |
| These requirements describe and are specific to scanning components in two axial and two circumferential directions.
| |
| This component was scanned to the extent possible to meet these requirements.
| |
| The aggregate coverage that was obtained is described and calculated from the following:
| |
| * 600 shear waves obtained 0% coverage in one axial direction (S1 -nozzle)* 600 shear waves obtained 50% coverage in one axial direction (S2 -safe end)* 450 shear waves obtained 50% coverage in one circumferential direction (CW).* 450 shear waves obtained 50% coverage in one circumferential direction (CCW).* The aggregate coverage was calculated to be (0% + 50% + 50% + 50%)/4 = 37.5%.In addition, best effort supplemental scanning was performed using 600 and 700 refracted longitudinal waves from the S2 pump casing side for interrogation of the upper 2/3 area within the cast material.Page 9 of 55 Oconee Relief Request 12-ON-001 Best effort supplemental scanning was also performed using 600 refracted longitudinal waves for interrogation of the lower 1/3 nozzle far side of the weld from the S1 safe-end side, but is not qualified to be calculated into the above claimed coverage.
| |
| The supplemental refracted longitudinal scan was only used for interrogation in the axial direction per procedural direction.
| |
| Supplemental scanning is not performed in the circumferential direction.
| |
| The impracticality was caused by the nozzle taper configuration and cast stainless steel material which cannot be effectively interrogated by ultrasound.
| |
| There are currently no examination techniques that have been qualified for cast stainless steel through Appendix VIII for cast stainless steel. Therefore, coverage could not be obtained by scanning from the nozzle side. In order to scan all of the required volume for this weld, the nozzle would have to be redesigned and replaced, which is impractical.
| |
| The Oconee Inservice Inspection Plan allows the use of Code Case N-460, which requires greater than 90% volumetric coverage.
| |
| Therefore, the available coverage will not meet the acceptance criteria of this Code Case.This relief request is specific to examination volume coverage limitations only. All other Code requirements were satisfied.
| |
| No indications were recorded during this examination.
| |
| The reject box on each UT Calibration/Examination sheet is marked for internal tracking of the coverage limitation only.4.5 Proposed Alternative and Basis for Use This weld was examined using procedures, equipment and personnel qualified in accordance with ASME Section XI, Appendix VIII. Radiography (RT) is not a desired option because RT is limited in the ability to detect service induced flaws and has not been qualified through performance demonstration.
| |
| Use of other manual or automated UT techniques, whether conventional or phased array, qualified under ASME Section XI, Appendix VIII would not increase coverage due to the limitation created by the cast stainless material.
| |
| The use of any other UT technique available would incur the same physical scanning limitations.
| |
| 4.6. Duration of Proposed Alternative This request is for the duration of the fourth inservice inspection interval, currently scheduled to end on July 15, 2014.4.7. Justification for Granting Relief Ultrasonic examination of the weld for the item number O1.B9.11.0029 was conducted using personnel, equipment, and procedures qualified in accordance with ASME Section XI, 1998 Edition with the 2000 Addenda.The system leakage test performed each refueling outage in accordance with Table IWB-2500-1, Examination Category B-P requires a VT-2 visual examination to detect evidence of leakage. This test and VT-2 examination provides additional assurance of pressure boundary integrity.
| |
| Page 10 of 55 Oconee Relief Request 12-ON-001 In addition to the above Code required examinations (volumetric and pressure test), Reactor Building Normal Sump monitoring and other leakage detection systems provide additional assurance that, in the event that leakage did occur through this weld, it would be detected and proper action taken.Duke Energy has examined the weld to the maximum extent possible utilizing approved examination techniques and equipment.
| |
| Based on the acceptable results for the coverage completed by the volumetric examination, the pressure testing (VT-2) examinations required by Section XI, and the leakage monitoring, it is Duke Energy's position that the combination of examinations provides a reasonable assurance of quality and safety.4.8 References None Page 11 of 55 Oconee Relief Request 12-ON-001 5.0 Weld #1-PDBI-1 5.1. ASME Code Component(s)
| |
| Affected Unit 1 Reactor Coolant Pump 1 B1 Casing Nozzle to Safe-End Weld, Weld #1-PDBI-1, Summary Number O1..B9.11.0072 and ASME Code Class 1.5.2. Applicable Code Edition and Addenda ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section XI, 1998 Edition through the 2000 Addenda.5.3. Applicable Code Requirement IWB-2500, Table IWB-2500-1, Examination Category B-J, Item Number B9.11 Figure IWB-2500-8 (c), 100% Volume Coverage of Examination Volume C-D-E-F.5.4. Impracticality of Compliance Component configuration:
| |
| * Surface 1: Forged Stainless Steel Safe End* Surface 2: Cast Stainless Steel Nozzle* NPS: 33.5 in.* Thickness:
| |
| 2.330 in.This component was scanned manually with conventional methods. Scanning requirements are described in 10 CFR 50.55a(b)(2)(xv)(A)(1).
| |
| These requirements describe and are specific to scanning components in two axial and two circumferential directions.
| |
| This component was scanned to the extent possible to meet these requirements.
| |
| The aggregate coverage that was obtained is described and calculated from the following:
| |
| 600 shear waves obtained 50% coverage in one axial direction (51 -safe end)* 600 shear waves obtained 0% coverage in one axial direction (S2 -nozzle)* 450 shear waves obtained 50% coverage in one circumferential direction (CW).* 450 shear waves obtained 50% coverage in one circumferential direction (CCW).* The aggregate coverage was calculated to be (50% + 0% + 50% + 50%)/4 = 37.5%.In addition, best effort supplemental scanning was performed using 600 and 700 refracted longitudinal waves from the S2 pump casing side for interrogation of the upper 2/3 area within the cast material.Page 12 of 55 Oconee Relief Request 12-ON-001 Best effort supplemental scanning was also performed using 600 refracted longitudinal waves for interrogation of the lower 1/3 nozzle on the far side of the weld from the S1 safe-end side, but is not qualified to be calculated into the above claimed coverage.
| |
| The supplemental refracted longitudinal scan was only used for interrogation in the axial direction per procedural direction.
| |
| Supplemental scanning is not performed in the circumferential direction.
| |
| The impracticality was caused by the nozzle taper configuration due to cast stainless steel material which cannot be effectively interrogated by ultrasound.
| |
| There are currently no examination techniques that have been qualified through Appendix VIII for cast stainless steels. Therefore, coverage could not be obtained by scanning from the nozzle side. In order to scan all of the required volume for this weld, the nozzle would have to be redesigned and replaced, which is impractical.
| |
| The Oconee Inservice Inspection Plan allows the use of Code Case N-460, which requires greater than 90% volumetric coverage.
| |
| Therefore, the available coverage will not meet the acceptance criteria of this Code Case.This relief request is specific to examination volume coverage limitations only. All other Code requirements were satisfied.
| |
| No indications were recorded during this examination.
| |
| The reject box on each UT Calibration/Examination sheet is marked for internal tracking of the coverage limitation only.5.5. Proposed Alternative and Basis for Use This weld was examined using procedures, equipment and personnel qualified in accordance with ASME Section XI, Appendix VIII. Radiography (RT) is not a desired option because RT is limited in the ability to detect service induced flaws and has not been qualified through performance demonstration.
| |
| Use of other manual or automated UT techniques, whether conventional or phased array, qualified under ASME Section XI, Appendix VIII would not increase coverage due to the limitation created by the cast stainless material.
| |
| The use of any other UT technique available would incur the same physical scanning limitations.
| |
| 5.6. Duration of Proposed Alternative This request is for the duration of the fourth inservice inspection interval, currently scheduled to end on July 15, 2014.5.7. Justification for Granting Relief Ultrasonic examination of the weld for the item number 01 .B9.111.0072 was conducted using personnel, equipment, and procedures qualified in accordance with ASME Section XI, 1998 Edition with the 2000 Addenda.The system leakage test performed each refueling outage in accordance with Table IWB-2500-1, Examination Category B-P requires a VT-2 visual examination to detect evidence of leakage. This test and VT-2 examination provides additional assurance of pressure boundary integrity.
| |
| Page 13 of 55 Oconee Relief Request 12-ON-001 In addition to the above Code required examinations (volumetric and pressure test), Reactor Building Normal Sump monitoring and other leakage detection systems provide additional assurance that, in the event that leakage did occur through this weld, it would be detected and proper action taken.Duke Energy has examined the weld to the maximum extent possible utilizing approved examination techniques and equipment.
| |
| Based on the acceptable results for the coverage completed by the volumetric examination, the pressure testing (VT-2) examinations required by Section XI, and the leakage monitoring, it is Duke Energy's position that the combination of examinations provides a reasonable assurance of quality and safety.5.8 References None Page 14 of 55 Oconee Relief Request 12-ON-001 6.0 Weld #1LP-128-80 6.1. ASME Code Component(s)
| |
| Affected Unit 1 Reducer to Valve 1 LP-1 8 Weld, Weld #1 LP-1 28-80, Summary Number O1.C5.11.0029 and ASME Code Class 2.6.2. Applicable Code Edition and Addenda ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section XI, 1998 Edition through the 2000 Addenda.6.3. Applicable Code Requirement IWC-2500, Table IWC-2500-1, Examination Category C-F-I, Item Number C5.11 Figure IWC-2500-7(a), 100% Volume Coverage of Examination Volume C-D-E-F.6.4. Impracticality of Compliance Component configuration:
| |
| * Surface 1: Forged Stainless Steel Reducer* Surface 2: Cast Stainless Steel Valve* Diameter:
| |
| 12.0 in.* Thickness:
| |
| 1.168 in.This component was scanned manually with conventional methods. Scanning requirements are described in 10 CFR 50.55a(b)(2)(xv)(A)(1).
| |
| These requirements describe and are specific to scanning components in two axial and two circumferential directions.
| |
| This component was scanned to the extent possible to meet these requirements.
| |
| The aggregate coverage that was obtained is described and calculated from the following:
| |
| 0 600 shear waves obtained 50% coverage in one axial direction (51 -reducer)* 600 shear waves obtained 0% coverage in one axial direction (S2 -valve)* 450 shear waves obtained 50% coverage in one axial direction (S3 -CW)* 450 shear waves obtained 50% coverage in one axial direction (S4 -CCW)a The aggregate coverage was calculated to be (50% + 0 + 50% + 50%)/4 = 37.5%.Best effort supplemental scanning was also performed using 600 refracted longitudinal waves for interrogation of the lower 1/3 valve far side of the weld from the S1 reducer side, but is not qualified to be calculated into the above claimed coverage.
| |
| The supplemental refracted longitudinal scan was only used for interrogation in the axial direction per procedural direction.
| |
| Supplemental scanning is not performed in the circumferential direction.
| |
| Page 15 of 55 Oconee Relief Request 12-ON-001 The impracticality was caused by the cast stainless steel material which cannot be effectively interrogated by ultrasound.
| |
| There are currently no examination techniques that have been qualified through Appendix VIII for cast stainless steels. Therefore, coverage could not be obtained by scanning from the valve side. In order to scan all of the required volume for this weld, the valve would have to be redesigned and replaced, which is impractical.
| |
| The Oconee Inservice Inspection Plan allows the use of Code Case N-460, which requires greater than 90% volumetric coverage.
| |
| Therefore, the available coverage will not meet the acceptance criteria of this Code Case.This relief request is specific to examination volume coverage limitations only. All other Code requirements were satisfied.
| |
| No indications were recorded during this examination.
| |
| The reject box on each UT Calibration/Examination sheet is marked for internal tracking of the coverage limitation only.6.5. Proposed Alternative and Basis for Use This weld was examined using procedures, equipment and personnel qualified in accordance with ASME Section XI, Appendix VIII. Radiography (RT) is not a desired option because RT is limited in the ability to detect service induced flaws and has not been qualified through performance demonstration.
| |
| Use of other manual or automated UT techniques, whether conventional or phased array, qualified under ASME Section XI, Appendix VIII would not increase coverage due to the limitation created by the cast stainless material.
| |
| The use of any other UT technique available would incur the same physical scanning limitations.
| |
| 6.6. Duration of Proposed Alternative This request is for the duration of the fourth inservice inspection interval, currently scheduled to end on July 15, 2014.6.7. Justification for Granting Relief Ultrasonic examination of the weld for the item number O1 .C5.11.0029 was conducted using personnel, equipment, and procedures qualified in accordance with ASME Section XI, 1998 Edition with the 2000 Addenda.The system leakage test performed each inspection period in accordance with Table IWC-2500-1, Examination Category C-H requires a VT-2 visual examination to detect evidence of leakage. This test and VT-2 examination provides additional assurance of pressure boundary integrity.
| |
| In addition to the above Code required examinations (volumetric and pressure test), visual observations performed during operator rounds provide additional assurance that in the event leakage did occur through this weld, it would be detected and proper action taken.Duke Energy has examined the weld to the maximum extent possible utilizing approved examination techniques and equipment.
| |
| Based on the acceptable Page 16 of 55 Oconee Relief Request 12-ON-001 results for the coverage completed by the volumetric examination, the pressure testing (VT-2) examinations required by Section XI, and the continuing periodic leakage inspections, it is Duke Energy's position that the combination of examinations provides a reasonable assurance of quality and safety.6.8 References None Page 17 of 55 Oconee Relief Request 12-ON-001 7.0 Weld #1 LP-209-17 7.1. ASME Code Component(s)
| |
| Affected Unit 1 Pipe to Flow Restrictor Weld, Weld #1 LP-209-17, Summary Number O1 .C5.11.0084 and ASME Code Class 2.7.2. Applicable Code Edition and Addenda ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section XI, 1998 Edition through the 2000 Addenda.7.3. Applicable Code Requirement IWC-2500, Table IWC-2500-1, Examination Category C-F-i, Item Number C5.11 Figure IWC-2500-7(a), 100% Volume Coverage of Examination Volume C-D-E-F.7.4. Impracticality of Compliance Component configuration:
| |
| * Surface 1: Forged Stainless Pipe* Surface 2: Cast Stainless Flow Restrictor
| |
| * Diameter:
| |
| 10.0 in.* Thickness:
| |
| 1.0 in.This component was scanned manually with conventional methods. Scanning requirements are described in 10 CFR 50.55a(b)(2)(xv)(A)(1).
| |
| These requirements describe and are specific to scanning components in two axial and two circumferential directions.
| |
| This component was scanned to the extent possible to meet these requirements.
| |
| The aggregate coverage that was obtained is described and calculated from the following:
| |
| * 600 shear waves obtained 50% coverage in one axial direction (S1 -pipe)* 600 shear waves obtained 0% coverage in one axial direction (S2 -flow restrictor)
| |
| * 450 shear waves obtained 50% coverage in one axial direction (S3 -CW)* 450 shear waves obtained 50% coverage in one axial direction (S4 -CCW)The aggregate coverage was calculated to be (50% + 0 + 50% + 50%)/4 = 37.5%.Best effort supplemental scanning was also performed using 600 refracted longitudinal waves for interrogation of the lower 1/3 flow restrictor far side of the weld from the S1 pipe side, but is not qualified to be calculated into the above claimed coverage.
| |
| The supplemental refracted longitudinal scan was only used for interrogation in the axial direction per procedural direction.
| |
| Supplemental scanning is not performed in the circumferential direction.
| |
| Page 18 of 55 Oconee Relief Request 12-ON-001 The impracticality was caused by the cast stainless steel material which cannot be effectively interrogated by ultrasound.
| |
| There are currently no examination techniques that have been qualified through Appendix VIII for cast stainless steel. Therefore, coverage could not be obtained by scanning from the flow restrictor side. In order to scan all of the required volume for this weld, the valve would have to be redesigned and replaced, which is impractical.
| |
| The Oconee Inservice Inspection Plan allows the use of Code Case N-460, which requires greater than 90% volumetric coverage.
| |
| Therefore, the available coverage will not meet the acceptance criteria of this Code Case.This relief request is specific to examination volume coverage limitations only. All other Code requirements were satisfied.
| |
| No indications were recorded during this examination.
| |
| The reject box on each UT Calibration/Examination sheet is marked for internal tracking of the coverage limitation only.7.5. Proposed Alternative and Basis for Use This weld was examined using procedures, equipment and personnel qualified in accordance with ASME Section Xl, Appendix VIII. Radiography (RT) is not a desired option because RT is limited in the ability to detect service induced flaws and has not been qualified through performance demonstration.
| |
| Use of other manual or automated UT techniques, whether conventional or phased array, qualified under ASME Section XI, Appendix VIII would not increase coverage due to the limitation created by the cast stainless material.
| |
| The use of any other UT technique available would incur the same physical scanning limitations.
| |
| 7.6. Duration of Proposed Alternative This request is for the duration of the fourth inservice inspection interval, currently scheduled to end on July 15, 2014.7.7. Justification for Granting Relief Ultrasonic examination of the weld for the item number O1.C5.11.0084 was conducted using personnel, equipment, and procedures qualified in accordance with ASME Section XI, 1998 Edition with the 2000 Addenda.The system leakage test performed each inspection period in accordance with Table IWC-2500-1, Examination Category C-H requires a VT-2 visual examination to detect evidence of leakage. This test and VT-2 examination provides additional assurance of pressure boundary integrity.
| |
| In addition to the above Code required examinations (volumetric and pressure test), Reactor Building Normal Sump monitoring and other leakage detection systems provide additional assurance that, in the event that leakage did occur through this weld, it would be detected and proper action taken.Duke Energy has examined the weld to the maximum extent possible utilizing approved examination techniques and equipment.
| |
| Based on the acceptable Page 19 of 55 Oconee Relief Request 12-ON-001 results for the coverage completed by the volumetric examination, the pressure testing (VT-2) examinations required by Section XI, and the leakage monitoring, it is Duke Energy's position that the combination of examinations provides a reasonable assurance of quality and safety.7.8 References None Page 20 of 55 Oconee Relief Request 12-ON-001 8.0 Weld #1LP-209-18 8.1. ASME Code Component(s)
| |
| Affected Unit 1 Pipe to Flow Restrictor Piping Weld, Weld #1 LP-209-18, Summary Number 01 .C5.11.0085 and ASME Code Class 2.8.2. Applicable Code Edition and Addenda ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section Xl, 1998 Edition through the 2000 Addenda.8.3. Applicable Code Requirement IWC-2500, Table IWC-2500-1, Examination Category C-F-i, Item Number C5.11 Figure IWC-2500-7(a), 100% Volume Coverage of Examination Volume C-D-E-F.8.4. Impracticality of Compliance Component configuration:
| |
| * Surface 1: Cast Stainless Flow Restrictor
| |
| * Surface 2: Forged Stainless Pipe* Diameter:
| |
| 10.0 in.* Thickness:
| |
| 1.0 in.This component was scanned manually with conventional methods. Scanning requirements are described in 10 CFR 50.55a(b)(2)(xv)(A)(1).
| |
| These requirements describe and are specific to scanning components in two axial and two circumferential directions.
| |
| This component was scanned to the extent possible to meet these requirements.
| |
| The aggregate coverage that was obtained is described and calculated from the following:
| |
| 600 shear waves obtained 0% coverage in one axial direction (S 1 -flow restrictor)
| |
| * 600 shear waves obtained 50% coverage in one axial direction (S2 -pipe)* 450 shear waves obtained 50% coverage in one axial direction (S3 -CW)* 450 shear waves obtained 50% coverage in one axial direction (S4 -CCW)The aggregate coverage was calculated to be (0% + 50 + 50% + 50%)/4 = 37.5%.Best effort supplemental scanning was also performed using 600 refracted longitudinal waves for interrogation of the lower 1/3 flow restrictor far side of the weld from the 51 pipe side, but is not qualified to be calculated into the above claimed coverage.
| |
| The supplemental refracted longitudinal scan was only used for interrogation in the axial direction per procedural direction.
| |
| Supplemental scanning is not performed in the circumferential direction.
| |
| Page 21 of 55 Oconee Relief Request 12-ON-001 The impracticality was caused by the cast stainless steel material which cannot be effectively interrogated by ultrasound.
| |
| There are currently no examination techniques that have been qualified through Appendix VIII for cast stainless steel. Therefore, coverage could not be obtained by scanning from the flow restrictor side. In order to scan all of the required volume for this weld, the valve would have to be redesigned and replaced, which is impractical.
| |
| The Oconee Inservice Inspection Plan allows the use of Code Case N-460, which requires greater than 90% volumetric coverage.
| |
| Therefore, the available coverage will not meet the acceptance criteria of this Code Case.This relief request is specific to examination volume coverage limitations only. All other Code requirements were satisfied.
| |
| No indications were recorded during this examination.
| |
| The reject box on each UT Calibration/Examination sheet is marked for internal tracking of the coverage limitation only.8.5. Proposed Alternative and Basis for Use This weld was examined using procedures, equipment and personnel qualified in accordance with ASME Section XI, Appendix VIII. Radiography (RT) is not a desired option because RT is limited in the ability to detect service induced flaws and has not been qualified through performance demonstration.
| |
| Use of other manual or automated UT techniques, whether conventional or phased array, qualified under ASME Section XI, Appendix VIII would not increase coverage due to the limitation created by the cast stainless material.
| |
| The use of any other UT technique available would incur the same physical scanning limitations.
| |
| 8.6. Duration of Proposed Alternative This request is for the duration of the fourth inservice inspection interval, currently scheduled to end on July 15, 2014.8.7. Justification for Granting Relief Ultrasonic examination of the weld for the item number O1 .C5.11.0085 was conducted using personnel, equipment, and procedures qualified in accordance with ASME Section XI, 1998 Edition with the 2000 Addenda.The system leakage test performed each inspection period in accordance with Table IWC-2500-1, Examination Category C-H requires a VT-2 visual examination to detect evidence of leakage. This test and VT-2 examination provides additional assurance of pressure boundary integrity.
| |
| In addition to the above Code required examinations (volumetric and pressure test), Reactor Building Normal Sump monitoring and other leakage detection systems provide additional assurance that, in the event that leakage did occur through this weld, it would be detected and proper action taken.Duke Energy has examined the weld to the maximum extent possible utilizing approved examination techniques and equipment.
| |
| Based on the acceptable results for the coverage completed by the volumetric examination, the pressure Page 22 of 55 Oconee Relief Request 12-ON-001 testing (VT-2) examinations required by Section XI, and the leakage monitoring, it is Duke Energy's position that the combination of examinations provides a reasonable assurance of quality and safety.8.8 References None Page 23 of 55 Oconee Relief Request 12-ON-001 9.0 Weld #1 HP-192-15 9.1. ASME Code Component(s)
| |
| Affected Unit 1 Flange Orifice to Pipe Weld, Weld #1 HP-1 92-15, Summary Number O1 .C5.21.0006 and ASME Code Class 2.9.2. Applicable Code Edition and Addenda ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section XI, 1998 Edition through the 2000 Addenda.9.3. Applicable Code Requirement IWC-2500, Table IWC-2500-1, Examination Category C-F-i, Item Number C5.21 Figure IWC-2500-7(a), 100% Volume Coverage of Examination Volume C-D-E-F.9.4. Impracticality of Compliance Component configuration:
| |
| * Surface 1: Forged Stainless Steel Flange* Surface 2: Forged Stainless Steel Pipe* Diameter:
| |
| 4.0 in.* Thickness:
| |
| 0.531 in.This component was scanned manually with conventional methods. Scanning requirements are described in 10 CFR 50.55a(b)(2)(xv)(A)(1).
| |
| These requirements describe and are specific to scanning components in two axial and two circumferential directions.
| |
| This component was scanned to the extent possible to meet these requirements.
| |
| The aggregate coverage that was obtained is described and calculated from the following:
| |
| 600 shear waves obtained 0% coverage in one axial direction (S1 -flange)* 600 shear waves obtained 50% coverage in one axial direction (S2 -pipe)* 450 shear waves obtained 50% coverage in one axial direction (S3 -CW)* 450 shear waves obtained 50% coverage in one axial direction (S4 -CCW)The aggregate coverage was calculated to be (0% + 50 + 50% + 50%)/4 = 37.5%.Best effort supplemental scanning was also performed using 700 refracted longitudinal waves for interrogation of the lower 1/3 flange far side of the weld from the S1 pipe side, but is not qualified to be calculated into the above claimed coverage.
| |
| The supplemental refracted longitudinal scan was only used for interrogation in the axial direction per procedural direction.
| |
| Supplemental scanning is not performed in the circumferential direction.
| |
| Page 24 of 55 Oconee Relief Request 12-ON-001 The impracticality was caused by the tapered configuration of the flange, which did not allow access to the full volume of the weld. Therefore coverage could not be obtained by scanning from the flange side. In order to scan all of the required volume for this weld, the flange would have to be redesigned and replaced, which is impractical.
| |
| The Oconee Inservice Inspection Plan allows the use of Code Case N-460, which requires greater than 90% volumetric coverage.
| |
| Therefore, the available coverage will not meet the acceptance criteria of this Code Case.This relief request is specific to examination volume coverage limitations only. All other Code requirements were satisfied.
| |
| The indication detected during the examination was the result of component geometry and was not associated with flaws in the component weld. The indication was acceptable without further evaluation.
| |
| The indication was dispositioned using procedure guidance on probe skewing, use of higher angles and indication plotting.
| |
| The reject box on each UT Calibration/Examination sheet is marked for internal tracking of the coverage limitation only.9.5. Proposed Alternative and Basis for Use This weld was examined using procedures, equipment and personnel qualified in accordance with ASME Section XI, Appendix VIII. Radiography (RT) is not a desired option because RT is limited in the ability to detect service induced flaws and has not been qualified through performance demonstration.
| |
| Use of other manual or automated UT techniques, whether conventional or phased array, qualified under ASME Section Xl, Appendix VIII would not increase coverage due to the limitation created by the component configuration.
| |
| The use of any other UT technique available would incur the same physical scanning limitations.
| |
| 9.6. Duration of Proposed Alternative This request is for the duration of the fourth inservice inspection interval, currently scheduled to end on July 15, 2014.9.7. Justification for Granting Relief Ultrasonic examination of the weld for the item number O1 .C5.21.0006 was conducted using personnel, equipment, and procedures qualified in accordance with ASME Section Xl, 1998 Edition with the 2000 Addenda.The system leakage test performed each inspection period in accordance with Table IWC-2500-1, Examination Category C-H requires a VT-2 visual examination to detect evidence of leakage. This test and VT-2 examination provides additional assurance of pressure boundary integrity.
| |
| In addition to the above Code required examinations (volumetric and pressure test), visual observations performed during operator rounds provide additional assurance that in the event leakage did occur through this weld, it would be detected and proper action taken.Page 25 of 55 Oconee Relief Request 12-ON-001 Duke Energy has examined the weld to the maximum extent possible utilizing approved examination techniques and equipment.
| |
| Based on the acceptable results for the coverage completed by the volumetric examination, the pressure testing (VT-2) examinations required by Section XI, and the continuing periodic leakage inspections, it is Duke Energy's position that the combination of examinations provides a reasonable assurance of quality and safety.9.8. References Duke Energy Relief Requests 02-ON-005 and 02-ON-004 were approved by the NRC during the last inspection interval.
| |
| The previous approved SE's are documented in Accession Number ML32721404, TAC No.MB5815 and MC5830 dated September 29, 2003.Page 26 of 55 Oconee Relief Request 12-ON-001 10.0 Weld #1-51A-01-91A 10.1. ASME Code Component(s)
| |
| Affected Unit 1 Pipe to Valve 1HP-128 Weld, Weld #1-51A-01-91A, Summary Number 01 .C5.21.0024 and ASME Code Class 2.10.2. Applicable Code Edition and Addenda ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section XI, 1998 Edition through the 2000 Addenda.10.3. Applicable Code Requirement IWC-2500, Table IWC-2500-1, Examination Category C-F-i, Item Number C5.21 Figure IWC-2500-7(a), 100% Volume Coverage of Examination Volume C-D-E-F.10.4. Impracticality of Compliance Component configuration:
| |
| * Surface 1: Forged Stainless Steel Pipe 0 Surface 2: Forged Stainless Steel Valve 0 Diameter:
| |
| 4.0 in.* Thickness:
| |
| 0.531 in.This component was scanned manually with conventional methods. Scanning requirements are described in 10 CFR 50.55a(b)(2)(xv)(A)(1).
| |
| These requirements describe and are specific to scanning components in two axial and two circumferential directions.
| |
| This component was scanned to the extent possible to meet these requirements.
| |
| The aggregate coverage that was obtained is described and calculated from the following:
| |
| * 600 shear waves obtained 100% coverage in one axial direction (S1 -pipe)0 600 shear waves obtained 100% coverage in one axial direction (S2 -valve)* 450 shear waves obtained 50% coverage in one axial direction (S3 -CW)* 450 shear waves obtained 50% coverage in one axial direction (S4 -CCW)0 The aggregate coverage was calculated to be (100% + 100 + 50% + 50%)/4 = 75.0%.Best effort supplemental scanning was not applied since the requirements of the ASME Code, Section XI, Supplement 2 pertaining to refracted longitudinal wave or 70 degree shear wave methods are to be applied during single sided exams when axial scanning can only be performed from one side of the weld. 100%coverage was obtained in each axial scan direction.
| |
| Page 27 of 55 Oconee Relief Request 12-ON-001 The impracticality was caused by the tapered configuration of the valve, which did not allow access to the full volume of the weld in the circumferential direction.
| |
| Therefore coverage could not be obtained by scanning from the valve side. In order to scan all of the required volume for this weld, the valve would have to be redesigned and replaced, which is impractical.
| |
| The Oconee Inservice Inspection Plan allows the use of Code Case N-460, which requires greater than 90% volumetric coverage.
| |
| Therefore, the available coverage will not meet the acceptance criteria of this Code Case.This relief request is specific to examination volume coverage limitations only. All other Code requirements were satisfied.
| |
| No indications were recorded during this examination.
| |
| The reject box on each UT Calibration/Examination sheet is marked for internal tracking of the coverage limitation only.10.5, Proposed Alternative and Basis for Use This weld was examined using procedures, equipment and personnel qualified in accordance with ASME Section XI, Appendix VIII. Radiography (RT) is not a desired option because RT is limited in the ability to detect service induced flaws and has not been qualified through performance demonstration.
| |
| Use of other manual or automated UT techniques, whether conventional or phased array, qualified under ASME Section XI, Appendix VIII would not increase coverage due to the limitation created by the component configuration.
| |
| The use of any other UT technique available would incur the same physical scanning limitations.
| |
| 10.6, Duration of Proposed Alternative This request is for the duration of the fourth inservice inspection interval, currently scheduled to end on July 15, 2014.10.7. Justification for Granting Relief Ultrasonic examination of the weld for the item number O1 .C5.21.0024 was conducted using personnel, equipment, and procedures qualified in accordance with ASME Section XI, 1998 Edition with the 2000 Addenda.The system leakage test performed each inspection period in accordance with Table IWC-2500-1, Examination Category C-H requires a VT-2 visual examination to detect evidence of leakage. This test and VT-2 examination provides additional assurance of pressure boundary integrity.
| |
| In addition to the above Code required examinations (volumetric and pressure test), visual observations performed during operator rounds provide additional assurance that in the event leakage did occur through this weld, it would be detected and proper action taken.Duke Energy has examined the weld to the maximum extent possible utilizing approved examination techniques and equipment.
| |
| Based on the acceptable results for the coverage completed by the volumetric examination, the pressure Page 28 of 55 Oconee Relief Request 12-ON-001 testing (VT-2) examinations required by Section Xl, and the continuing periodic leakage inspections, it is Duke Energy's position that the combination of examinations provides a reasonable assurance of quality and safety.10.8. References Duke Energy Relief Requests 02-ON-005 and 02-ON-004 were approved by the NRC during the last inspection interval.
| |
| The previous approved SE's are documented in Accession Number ML32721404, TAC No.MB5815 and MC5830 dated September 29, 2003.Page 29 of 55 Oconee Relief Request 12-ON-001 11.0 Weld #1HP-324-118B 11.1. ASME Code Component(s)
| |
| Affected Unit 1 Tee to Valve 1 HP-1 19 Weld, Weld #1 HP-324-118B, Summary Number O1.C5.21.0041 and ASME Code Class 2.11.2. Applicable Code Edition and Addenda ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section XI, 1998 Edition through the 2000 Addenda.11.3. Applicable Code Requirement IWC-2500, Table IWC-2500-1, Examination Category C-F-i, Item Number C5.21 Figure IWC-2500-7(a), 100% Volume Coverage of Examination Volume C-D-E-F.11.4. Impracticality of Compliance Component configuration:
| |
| * Surface 1: Forged Stainless Steel Valve* Surface 2: Forged Stainless Steel Tee* Diameter:
| |
| 2.5 in.* Thickness:
| |
| 0.375 in.This component was scanned manually with conventional methods. Scanning requirements are described in 10 CFR 50.55a(b)(2)(xv)(A)(1).
| |
| These requirements describe and are specific to scanning components in two axial and two circumferential directions.
| |
| This component was scanned to the extent possible to meet these requirements.
| |
| The aggregate coverage that was obtained is described and calculated from the following:
| |
| 600 shear waves obtained 77.850% coverage in one axial direction (S1 -valve)600 shear waves obtained 88.925% coverage in one axial direction (S2 -tee)* 450 shear waves obtained 50% coverage in one axial direction (S3 -CW)* 450 shear waves obtained 50% coverage in one axial direction (S4 -CCW)The aggregate coverage was calculated to be (77.850% + 88.925 + 50% + 50%)/4 = 66.694%.Best effort supplemental scanning was performed using 700 shear waves for interrogation of the lower 1/3 valve far side of the weld from the S2 tee side, but is not qualified to be calculated into the above claimed coverage.
| |
| The supplemental shear was only used for interrogation in the axial direction per procedural direction.
| |
| Supplemental scanning is not performed in the circumferential direction.
| |
| The 700 shear wave was selected to supplement the 600 shear waves as the component is less than 0.500" in thickness.
| |
| Page 30 of 55 Oconee Relief Request 12-ON-001 The impracticality was caused by the tapered configuration of the valve, which did not allow access to the full volume of the weld in the circumferential direction.
| |
| Welded attachments prevented complete scanning from the valve side in the axial direction.
| |
| Therefore coverage could not be obtained by scanning from the valve side. In order to scan all of the required volume for this weld, the valve would have to be redesigned and replaced, which is impractical.
| |
| The Oconee Inservice Inspection Plan allows the use of Code Case N-460, which requires greater than 90% volumetric coverage.
| |
| Therefore, the available coverage will not meet the acceptance criteria of this Code Case.This relief request is specific to examination volume coverage limitations only. All other Code requirements were satisfied.
| |
| No indications were recorded during this examination.
| |
| The reject box on each UT Calibration/Examination sheet is marked for internal tracking of the coverage limitation only.11.5. Proposed Alternative and Basis for Use This weld was examined using procedures, equipment and personnel qualified in accordance with ASME Section XI, Appendix VIII. Radiography (RT) is not a desired option because RT is limited in the ability to detect service induced flaws and has not been qualified through performance demonstration.
| |
| Use of other manual or automated UT techniques, whether conventional or phased array, qualified under ASME Section XI, Appendix VIII would not increase coverage due to the limitation created by the component configuration.
| |
| The use of any other UT technique available would incur the same physical scanning limitations.
| |
| 11.6. Duration of Proposed Alternative This request is for the duration of the fourth inservice inspection interval, currently scheduled to end on July 15, 2014.11 .7. Justification for Granting Relief Ultrasonic examination of the weld for the item number O1 .C5.21.0041 was conducted using personnel, equipment, and procedures qualified in accordance with ASME Section XI, 1998 Edition with the 2000 Addenda.The system leakage test performed each inspection period in accordance with Table IWC-2500-1, Examination Category C-H requires a VT-2 visual examination to detect evidence of leakage. This test and VT-2 examination provides additional assurance of pressure boundary integrity.
| |
| In addition to the above Code required examinations (volumetric and pressure test), visual observations performed during operator rounds provide additional assurance that in the event leakage did occur through this weld, it would be detected and proper action taken.Duke Energy has examined the weld to the maximum extent possible utilizing approved examination techniques and equipment.
| |
| Based on the acceptable Page 31 of 55 Oconee Relief Request 12-ON-001 results for the coverage completed by the volumetric examination, the pressure testing (VT-2) examinations required by Section XI, and the continuing periodic leakage inspections, it is Duke Energy's position that the combination of examinations provides a reasonable assurance of quality and safety.S1.8. References Duke Energy Relief Requests 02-ON-005 and 02-ON-004 were approved by the NRC during the last inspection interval.
| |
| The previous approved SE's are documented in Accession Number ML32721404, TAC No.MB5815 and MC5830 dated September 29, 2003.Page 32 of 55 Oconee Relief Request 12-ON-001 12.0 Weld #1-51A-02-34B 12.1. ASME Code Component(s)
| |
| Affected Unit 1 Elbow to Valve 1 HP-1 34, Weld #1-51A-02-34B, Summary Number O1.C5.21.0053 and ASME Code Class 2.12.2. Applicable Code Edition and Addenda ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section Xl, 1998 Edition through the 2000 Addenda.12.3. Applicable Code Requirement IWC-2500, Table IWC-2500-1, Examination Category C-F-I, Item Number C5.21 Figure IWC-2500-7(a), 100% Volume Coverage of Examination Volume C-D-E-F.12.4. Impracticality of Compliance Component configuration:
| |
| * Surface 1: Forged Stainless Steel Elbow* Surface 2: Forged Stainless Steel Valve* Diameter:
| |
| 4.0 in.* Thickness:
| |
| 0.531 in.This component was scanned manually with conventional methods. Scanning requirements are described in 10 CFR 50.55a(b)(2)(xv)(A)(1).
| |
| These requirements describe and are specific to scanning components in two axial and two circumferential directions.
| |
| This component was scanned to the extent possible to meet these requirements.
| |
| The aggregate coverage that was obtained is described and calculated from the following:
| |
| 600 shear waves obtained 100% coverage in one axial direction (S1 -elbow)450 shear waves obtained 46.1 % coverage in one axial direction (S2 -valve)* 450 shear waves obtained 50% coverage in one axial direction (S3 -CW)* 450 shear waves obtained 50% coverage in one axial direction (S4 -CCW)The aggregate coverage was calculated to be (100% + 46.1 + 50% + 50%)/4 = 61.525%.Best effort supplemental scanning was also performed using 600 refracted longitudinal waves for interrogation of the lower 1/3 valve far side of the weld from the S1 elbow side, but is not qualified to be calculated into the above claimed coverage.
| |
| The supplemental refracted longitudinal scan was only used for interrogation in the axial direction per procedural direction.
| |
| Supplemental scanning is not performed in the circumferential direction.
| |
| Page 33 of 55 Oconee Relief Request 12-ON-001 The impracticality was caused by the tapered configuration of the valve, which did not allow access to the full volume of the weld. Therefore coverage could not be obtained by scanning from the valve side. In order to scan all of the required volume for this weld, the valve would have to be redesigned and replaced, which is impractical.
| |
| The Oconee Inservice Inspection Plan allows the use of Code Case N-460, which requires greater than 90% volumetric coverage.
| |
| Therefore, the available coverage will not meet the acceptance criteria of this Code Case.This relief request is specific to examination volume coverage limitations only. All other Code requirements were satisfied.
| |
| No indications were recorded during this examination.
| |
| The reject box on each UT Calibration/Examination sheet is marked for internal tracking of the coverage limitation only.12.5. Proposed Alternative and Basis for Use This weld was examined using procedures, equipment and personnel qualified in accordance with ASME Section XI, Appendix VIII. Radiography (RT) is not a desired option because RT is limited in the ability to detect service induced flaws and has not been qualified through performance demonstration.
| |
| Use of other manual or automated UT techniques, whether conventional or phased array, qualified under ASME Section XI, Appendix VIII would not increase coverage due to the limitation created by the component configuration.
| |
| The use of any other UT technique available would incur the same physical scanning limitations.
| |
| 12.6. Duration of Proposed Alternative This request is for the duration of the fourth inservice inspection interval, currently scheduled to end on July 15, 2014.12.7. Justification for Granting Relief Ultrasonic examination of the weld for the item number O1 .C5.21.0053 was conducted using personnel, equipment, and procedures qualified in accordance with ASME Section XI, 1998 Edition with the 2000 Addenda.In addition to the volumetric examination with limited coverage, Duke Energy performed a surface examination (code required) on this C5.21 item. The result from the surface examination was acceptable.
| |
| The system leakage test performed each inspection period in accordance with Table IWC-2500-1, Examination Category C-H requires a VT-2 visual examination to detect evidence of leakage. This test and VT-2 examination provides additional assurance of pressure boundary integrity.
| |
| In addition to the above Code required examinations (volumetric, surface, and pressure test), visual observations performed during operator rounds provide additional assurance that in the event leakage did occur through this weld, it would be detected and proper action taken.Page 34 of 55 Oconee Relief Request 12-ON-001 Duke Energy has examined the weld to the maximum extent possible utilizing approved examination techniques and equipment.
| |
| Based on the acceptable results for the coverage completed by the volumetric examination, the acceptable results of the surface examinations performed during this outage, the pressure testing (VT-2) examinations required by Section XI, and the continuing periodic leakage inspections, it is Duke Energy's position that the combination of examinations provides a reasonable' assurance of quality and safety.12.8. References Duke Energy Relief Requests 02-ON-005 and 02-ON-004 were approved by the NRC during the last inspection interval.
| |
| The previous approved SE's are documented in Accession Number ML32721404, TAC No.MB5815 and MC5830 dated September 29, 2003.Page 35 of 55 Oconee Relief Request 12-ON-001 13.0 Weld #1HP-193-12 13.1. ASME Code Component(s)
| |
| Affected Unit I Tee to Valve 1HP-26 Weld, Weld #1HP-193-12, Summary Number O1 .C5.21.0057 and ASME Code Class 2.13.2. Applicable Code Edition and Addenda ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section XI, 1998 Edition through the 2000 Addenda.13.3. Applicable Code Requirement IWC-2500, Table IWC-2500-1, Examination Category C-F-i, Item Number C5.21 Figure IWC-2500-7(a), 100% Volume Coverage of Examination Volume C-D-E-F.13.4. Impracticality of Compliance Component configuration:
| |
| * Surface 1: Cast Stainless Steel Valve* Surface 2: Forged Stainless Steel Tee* Diameter:
| |
| 4.0 in.* Thickness:
| |
| 0.531 in.This component was scanned manually with conventional methods. Scanning requirements are described in 10 CFR 50.55a(b)(2)(xv)(A)(1).
| |
| These requirements describe and are specific to scanning components in two axial and two circumferential directions.
| |
| This component was scanned to the extent possible to meet these requirements.
| |
| The aggregate coverage that was obtained is described and calculated from the following:
| |
| * 600 shear waves obtained 0% coverage in one axial direction (S1 -valve)* 600 shear waves obtained 50% coverage in one axial direction (S2 -tee)* 450 shear waves obtained 50% coverage in one axial direction (S3 -CW)* 450 shear waves obtained 50% coverage in one axial direction (S4 -CCW)The aggregate coverage was calculated to be (0% + 50% + 50% + 50%)/4 = 37.5%.Best effort supplemental scanning was also performed using 700 refracted longitudinal waves for interrogation of the lower 1/3 valve far side of the weld from the S1 tee side, but is not qualified to be calculated into the above claimed coverage.
| |
| The supplemental refracted longitudinal scan was only used for interrogation in the axial direction per procedural direction.
| |
| Supplemental scanning is not performed in the circumferential direction.
| |
| The impracticality was caused by the cast stainless steel material which cannot be effectively interrogated by ultrasound.
| |
| There are currently no examination Page 36 of 55 Oconee Relief Request 12-ON-001 techniques that have been qualified through Appendix VIII for cast stainless steel. Therefore, coverage could not be obtained by scanning from the valve side. In order to scan all of the required volume for this weld, the valve would have to be redesigned and replaced, which is impractical.
| |
| The Oconee Inservice Inspection Plan allows the use of Code Case N-460, which requires greater than 90% volumetric coverage.
| |
| Therefore, the available coverage will not meet the acceptance criteria of this Code Case.This relief request is specific to examination volume coverage limitations only. All other Code requirements were satisfied.
| |
| No indications were recorded during this examination.
| |
| The reject box on each UT Calibration/Examination sheet is marked for internal tracking of the coverage limitation only.13.5. Proposed Alternative and Basis for Use This weld was examined using procedures, equipment and personnel qualified in accordance with ASME Section XI, Appendix VIII. Radiography (RT) is not a desired option because RT is limited in the ability to detect service induced flaws and has not been qualified through performance demonstration.
| |
| Use of other manual or automated UT techniques, whether conventional or phased array, qualified under ASME Section XI, Appendix VIII would not increase coverage due to the limitation created by the cast stainless material.
| |
| The use of any other UT technique available would incur the same physical scanning limitations.
| |
| 13.6. Duration of Proposed Alternative This request is for the duration of the fourth inservice inspection interval, currently scheduled to end on July 15, 2014.13.7. Justification for Granting Relief Ultrasonic examination of the weld for the item number O1 .C5.21.0057 was conducted using personnel, equipment, and procedures qualified in accordance with ASME Section Xl, 1998 Edition with the 2000 Addenda.The system leakage test performed each inspection period in accordance with Table IWC-2500-1, Examination Category C-H requires a VT-2 visual examination to detect evidence of leakage. This test and VT-2 examination provides additional assurance of pressure boundary integrity.
| |
| In addition to the above Code required examinations (volumetric and pressure test), visual observations performed during operator rounds provide additional assurance that in the event leakage did occur through this weld, it would be detected and proper action taken.Duke Energy has examined the weld to the maximum extent possible utilizing approved examination techniques and equipment.
| |
| Based on the acceptable results for the coverage completed by the volumetric examination, the pressure testing (VT-2) examinations required by Section XI, and the continuing periodic Page 37 of 55 Oconee Relief Request 12-ON-001 leakage inspections, it is Duke Energy's position that the combination of examinations provides a reasonable assurance of quality and safety.13.8. References Duke Energy Relief Requests 02-ON-005 and 02-ON-004 were approved by the NRC during the last inspection interval.
| |
| The previous approved SE's are documented in Accession Number ML32721404, TAC No.MB5815 and MC5830 dated September 29, 2003.Page 38 of 55 Oconee Relief Request 12-ON-001 14.0 Weld #1-51A-01-103A 14.1. ASME Code Component(s)
| |
| Affected Unit 1 Pipe to Valve 1HP-109 Weld, Weld #1-51A-01-103A, Summary Number O1.C5.21.0066 and ASME Code Class 2.14.2. Applicable Code Edition and Addenda ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section XI, 1998 Edition through the 2000 Addenda.14.3. Applicable Code Requirement IWC-2500, Table IWC-2500-1, Examination Category C-F-i, Item Number C5.21 Figure IWC-2500-7(a), 100% Volume Coverage of Examination Volume C-D-E-F.14.4. Impracticality of Compliance Component configuration:
| |
| * Surface 1: Forged Stainless Steel Valve* Surface 2: Forged Stainless Steel Pipe* Diameter:
| |
| 3.0 in.* Thickness:
| |
| 0.438 in.This component was scanned manually with conventional methods. Scanning requirements are described in 10 CFR.50.55a(b)(2)(xv)(A)(1).
| |
| These requirements describe and are specific to scanning components in two axial and two circumferential directions.
| |
| This component was scanned to the extent possible to meet these requirements.
| |
| The aggregate coverage that was obtained is described and calculated from the following:
| |
| 600 shear waves obtained 100% coverage in one axial direction (S1 -valve)600 shear waves obtained 100% coverage in one axial direction (S2 -pipe)* 450 shear waves obtained 50% coverage in one axial direction (S3 -CW)* 450 shear waves obtained 50% coverage in one axial direction (S4 -CCW)The aggregate coverage was calculated to be (100% + 100% + 50% + 50%)/4 = 75.0%.Best effort supplemental scanning was not applied since the requirements of the ASME Code, Section XI, Supplement 2 pertaining to refracted longitudinal wave or 70 degree shear wave methods are to be applied during single sided exams when axial scanning.
| |
| can only be performed from one side of the weld. 100%coverage was obtained in each axial scan direction.
| |
| Page 39 of 55 Oconee Relief Request 12-ON-001 The impracticality was caused by the tapered configuration of the valve, which did not allow access to the full volume of the weld in the circumferential direction.
| |
| Therefore coverage could not be obtained by scanning from the valve side. In order to scan all of the required volume for this weld, the valve would have to be redesigned and replaced, which is impractical.
| |
| The Oconee Inservice Inspection Plan allows the use of Code Case N-460, which requires greater than 90% volumetric coverage.
| |
| Therefore, the available coverage will not meet the acceptance criteria of this Code Case.This relief request is specific to examination volume coverage limitations only. All other Code requirements were satisfied.
| |
| No indications were recorded during this examination.
| |
| The reject box on each UT Calibration/Examination sheet is marked for internal tracking of the coverage limitation only.14.5. Proposed Alternative and Basis for Use This weld was examined using procedures, equipment and personnel qualified in accordance with ASME Section XI, Appendix VIII. Radiography (RT) is not a desired option because RT is limited in the ability to detect service induced flaws and has not been qualified through performance demonstration.
| |
| Use of other manual or automated UT techniques, whether conventional or phased array, qualified under ASME Section XI, Appendix VIII would not increase coverage due to the limitation created by the component configuration.
| |
| The use of any other UT technique available would incur the same physical scanning limitations.
| |
| 14.6. Duration of Proposed Alternative This request is for the duration of the fourth inservice inspection interval, currently scheduled to end on July 15, 2014.14.7. Justification for Granting Relief Ultrasonic examination of the weld for the item number O1 .C5.21.0066 was conducted using personnel, equipment, and procedures qualified in accordance with ASME Section XI, 1998 Edition with the 2000 Addenda.The system leakage test performed each inspection period in accordance with Table IWC-2500-1, Examination Category C-H requires a VT-2 visual examination to detect evidence of leakage. This test and VT-2 examination provides additional assurance of pressure boundary integrity.
| |
| In addition to the above Code required examinations (volumetric and pressure test), visual observations performed during operator rounds provide additional assurance that in the event leakage did occur through this weld, it would be detected and proper action taken.Duke Energy has examined the weld to the maximum extent possible utilizing approved examination techniques and equipment.
| |
| Based on the acceptable results for the coverage completed by the volumetric examination, the pressure Page 40 of 55 Oconee Relief Request 12-ON-001 testing (VT-2) examinations required by Section XI, and the continuing periodic leakage inspections, it is Duke Energy's position that the combination of examinations provides a reasonable assurance of quality and safety.14.8. References Duke Energy Relief Requests 02-ON-005 and 02-ON-004 were approved by the NRC during the last inspection interval.
| |
| The previous approved SE's are documented in Accession Number ML32721404, TAC No.MB5815 and MC5830 dated September 29, 2003.Page 41 of 55 Oconee Relief Request 12-ON-001 15.0 Weld #1LPS-563-14 15.1. ASME Code Component(s)
| |
| Affected Unit 1 Valve 1 LPS-022 to Pipe Weld, Weld #1 LPS-563-14, Summary Number 01 .C5.51.0050, Low Pressure Service Water System, and ASME Code Class 2.15.2. Applicable Code Edition and Addenda ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section XI, 1998 Edition through the 2000 Addenda.15.3. Applicable Code Requirement IWC-2500, Table IWC-2500-1, Examination Category C-F-2, Item Number C5.51 Figure IWC-2500-7(a), 100% Volume Coverage of Examination Volume C-D-E-F.15.4. Impracticality of Compliance Component configuration:
| |
| * Surface 1: Carbon Steel Pipe* Surface 2: Cast Stainless Steel Valve* Diameter:
| |
| 8.0 in.* Thickness:
| |
| 0.50 in.This component was scanned manually with conventional methods. Scanning requirements are described in I OCFR.50.55a(b)(2)(xv)(A)(1).
| |
| These requirements describe and are specific to scanning components in two axial and two circumferential directions.
| |
| This component was scanned to the extent possible to meet these requirements.
| |
| The aggregate coverage that was obtained is described and calculated from the following:
| |
| * 600 shear waves obtained 50% coverage in one axial direction (S1 -pipe)* 600 shear waves obtained 0% coverage in one axial direction (S2 -valve)* 450 shear waves obtained 50% coverage in one axial direction (S3 -CW)* 450 shear waves obtained 50% coverage in one axial direction (S4 -CCW)The aggregate coverage was calculated to be (50% + 0% + 50% + 50%)/4 = 37.5%.The impracticality was caused by the cast stainless steel material which cannot be effectively interrogated by ultrasound.
| |
| There are currently no examination techniques that have been qualified through Appendix VIII for cast stainless steel. Therefore, coverage could not be obtained by scanning from the valve side. In order to scan all of the required volume for this weld, the valve would have to be redesigned and replaced, which is impractical.
| |
| Page 42 of 55 Oconee Relief Request 12-ON-001 The Oconee Inservice Inspection Plan allows the use of Code Case N-460, which requires greater than 90% volumetric coverage.
| |
| Therefore, the available coverage will not meet the acceptance criteria of this Code Case.This relief request is specific to examination volume coverage limitations only. All other Code requirements were satisfied.
| |
| No indications were recorded during this examination.
| |
| The reject box on each UT Calibration/Examination sheet is marked for internal tracking of the coverage limitation only.15.5. Proposed Alternative and Basis for Use This weld was examined using procedures, equipment and personnel qualified in accordance with ASME Section XI, Appendix VIII. Radiography (RT) is not a desired option because RT is limited in the ability to detect service induced flaws and has not been qualified through performance demonstration.
| |
| Use of other manual or automated UT techniques, whether conventional or phased array, qualified under ASME Section XI, Appendix VIII would not increase coverage due to the limitation created by the cast stainless material.
| |
| The use of any other UT technique available would incur the same physical scanning limitations.
| |
| 15.6. Duration of Proposed Alternative This request is for the duration of the fourth inservice inspection interval, currently scheduled to end on July 15, 2014.15.7. Justification for Granting Relief Ultrasonic examination of the weld for the item number O1 .C5.51.0050 was conducted using personnel, equipment, and procedures qualified in accordance with ASME Section XI, 1998 Edition with the 2000 Addenda.The system leakage test performed each inspection period in accordance with Table IWC-2500-1, Examination Category C-H requires a VT-2 visual examination to detect evidence of leakage. This test and VT-2 examination provides additional assurance of pressure boundary integrity.
| |
| In addition to the above Code required examinations (volumetric and pressure test), visual observations performed during operator rounds provide additional assurance that in the event leakage did occur through this weld, it would be detected and proper action taken.Duke Energy has examined the weld to the maximum extent possible utilizing approved examination techniques and equipment.
| |
| Based on the acceptable results for the coverage completed by the volumetric examination, the pressure testing (VT-2) examinations required by Section XI, and the continuing periodic leakage inspections, it is Duke Energy's position that the combination of examinations provides a reasonable assurance of quality and safety.15.8 References None Page 43 of 55 Oconee Relief Request 12-ON-001 16.0 Weld #1 LPS-702-50 16.1. ASME Code Component(s)
| |
| Affected Unit 1 Valve 1LPSW-016 to Pipe Weld, Weld #1 LPS-702-50, Summary Number 01 .C5.51.0053, Low Pressure Service Water System, and ASME Code Class 2.16.2. Applicable Code Edition and Addenda ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section XI, 1998 Edition through the 2000 Addenda.16.3. Applicable Code Requirement IWC-2500, Table IWC-2500-1, Examination Category C-F-2, Item Number C5.51 Figure IWC-2500-7(a), 100% Volume Coverage of Examination Volume C-D-E-F.16.4. Impracticality of Compliance Component configuration:
| |
| * Surface 1: Carbon Steel Pipe* Surface 2: Cast Stainless Steel Valve* Diameter:
| |
| 8.0 in.* Thickness:
| |
| 0.50 in.This component was scanned manually with conventional methods. Scanning requirements are described in 10CFR.50.55a(b)(2)(xv)(A)(1).
| |
| These requirements describe and are specific to scanning components in two axial and two circumferential directions.
| |
| This component was scanned to the extent possible to meet these requirements.
| |
| The aggregate coverage that was obtained is described and calculated from the following:
| |
| * 600 shear waves obtained 50% coverage in one axial direction (S1 -pipe)* 600 shear waves obtained 0% coverage in one axial direction (S2 -valve)* 450 shear waves obtained 50% coverage in one axial direction (S3 -CW)* 450 shear waves obtained 50% coverage in one axial direction (S4 -CCW)The aggregate coverage was calculated to be (50% + 0% + 50% + 50%)/4 = 37.5%.The impracticality was caused by the cast stainless steel material which cannot be effectively interrogated by ultrasound.
| |
| There are currently no examination techniques that have been qualified through Appendix VIII for cast stainless steel. Therefore, coverage could not be obtained by scanning from the valve side. In order to scan all of the required volume for this weld, the valve would have to be redesigned and replaced, which is impractical.
| |
| Page 44 of 55 Oconee Relief Request 12-ON-001 The Oconee Inservice Inspection Plan allows the use of Code Case N-460, which requires greater than 90% volumetric coverage.
| |
| Therefore, the available coverage will not meet the acceptance criteria of this Code Case.This relief request is specific to examination volume coverage limitations only. All other Code requirements were satisfied.
| |
| No indications were recorded during this examination.
| |
| The reject box on each UT Calibration/Examination sheet is marked for internal tracking of the coverage limitation only.16.5. Proposed Alternative and Basis for Use This weld was examined using procedures, equipment and personnel qualified in accordance with ASME Section XI, Appendix VIII. Radiography (RT) is not a desired option because RT is limited in the ability to detect service induced flaws and has not been qualified through performance demonstration.
| |
| Use of other manual or automated UT techniques, whether conventional or phased array, qualified under ASME Section XI, Appendix VIII would not increase coverage due to the limitation created by the cast stainless material.
| |
| The use of any other UT technique available would incur the same physical scanning limitations.
| |
| 16.6. Duration of Proposed Alternative This request is for the duration of the fourth inservice inspection interval, currently scheduled to end on July 15, 2014.16.7. Justification for Granting Relief Ultrasonic examination of the weld for the item number O1 .C5.51.0053 was conducted using personnel, equipment, and procedures qualified in accordance with ASME Section XI, 1998 Edition with the 2000 Addenda.The system leakage test performed each inspection period in accordance with Table IWC-2500-1, Examination Category C-H requires a VT-2 visual examination to detect evidence of leakage. This test and VT-2 examination provides additional assurance of pressure boundary integrity.
| |
| In addition to the above Code required examinations (volumetric and pressure test), visual observations performed during operator rounds provide additional assurance that in the event leakage did occur through this weld, it would be detected and proper action taken.Duke Energy has examined the weld to the maximum extent possible utilizing approved examination techniques and equipment.
| |
| Based on the acceptable results for the coverage completed by the volumetric examination, the pressure testing (VT-2) examinations required by Section XI, and the continuing periodic leakage inspections, it is Duke Energy's position that the combination of examinations provides a reasonable assurance of quality and safety.16.8 References None Page 45 of 55 Oconee Relief Request 12-ON-001 17.0 Weld WJ32 (Serial #N-32389-1) 17.1. ASME Code Component(s)
| |
| Affected Unit 1 Letdown Cooler SN# N-32389-1 Inlet Channel Body to Chemical Connector Weld # WJ32, Summary Number PSI and ASME Code Class 1.17.2. Applicable Code Edition and Addenda ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section XI, 1998 Edition through the 2000 Addenda.17.3. Applicable Code Requirement IWB-2500, Table IWB-2500-1, Examination Category B-B, Item Number B2.51 Figure IWB-2500-1, 100% Volume Coverage of Examination Volume A-B-C-D.17.4. Impracticality of Compliance Component configuration:
| |
| * Surface 1: Stainless Steel Inlet Channel Body* Surface 2: Stainless Steel Chemical Connector* Diameter:
| |
| 8.620 in.* Thickness:
| |
| 0.875 in.This component was scanned manually using conventional methods. Scanning requirements are described in ASME Section XI, Appendix III, 111-4420 and III-4430. These requirements describe and are specific to scanning components in two axial and two circumferential directions.
| |
| This component was scanned to the extent possible to meet these requirements.
| |
| The aggregate coverage that was obtained is described and calculated from the following.
| |
| Axial scan coverage:
| |
| 450 shear waves and 450, 600 and 700 longitudinal waves in the S1 and S2 direction obtained an aggregate coverage of 97.2%Circumferential scan coverage:
| |
| 450 shear waves obtained an aggregate coverage of 78.1%The total aggregate coverage was calculated to be (97.2% + 78.1% )/2 = 87.7%In addition, a best effort examination was performed using 600 and 700 longitudinal waves to the extent possible in the upper 2/3 area of interest.The impracticality was caused by the taper configuration of the chemical connector and the proximity of a nozzle within the scan area from the inlet channel body. In order to scan all of the volume for this weld, the chemical connector and location of the adjacent nozzle would have to be redesigned and replaced, which is impractical.
| |
| Page 46 of 55 Oconee Relief Request 12-ON-001 The Oconee Inservice Inspection Plan allows the use of Code Case N-460, which requires greater than 90% volumetric coverage.
| |
| Therefore, the available coverage will not meet the acceptance criteria of this Code Case.This relief request is specific to examination volume coverage limitations only. All other Code requirements were satisfied.
| |
| Four indications were detected during the examinations that were determined to be all from component geometry.
| |
| The indications were not associated with flaws in the component weld. The indications were acceptable without further evaluation.
| |
| The dispositions for the indications were by procedure guidance on the use of probe skewing, use of higher angles and indication plotting.
| |
| The reject box on each UT Calibration/Examination sheet is marked for internal tracking of the coverage limitation only.17.5. Proposed Alternative and Basis for Use No substitution alternative for this weld is available which would provide better coverage.
| |
| Radiography (RT) is not a desired option because RT is limited in the ability to detect service induced flaws. Use of other manual or automated UT techniques, whether conventional or phased array, were considered, but would not increase coverage due to the limitation created by the component configuration.
| |
| The use of any other UT technique available would incur the same physical scanning limitations.
| |
| 17.6. Duration of Proposed Alternative This request is for the duration of the fourth inservice inspection interval, currently scheduled to end on July 15, 2014.17.7. Justification for Granting Relief Ultrasonic examination of the weld for the item number PSI was conducted using personnel, equipment, and procedures qualified in accordance with ASME Section Xl, 1998 Edition with the 2000 Addenda.The system leakage test performed each refueling outage in accordance with Table IWB-2500-1, Examination Category B-P requires a VT-2 visual examination to detect evidence of leakage. This test and VT-2 examination provides additional assurance of pressure boundary integrity.
| |
| In addition to the above Code required examinations (volumetric and pressure test), Reactor Building Normal Sump monitoring and other leakage detection systems provide additional assurance that, in the event that leakage did occur through this weld, it would be detected and proper action taken.Duke Energy has examined the weld to the maximum extent possible utilizing approved examination techniques and equipment.
| |
| Based on the acceptable results for the coverage completed by the volumetric examination, the pressure testing (VT-2) examinations required by Section XI, and the leakage monitoring, it is Duke Energy's position that the combination of examinations provides a reasonable assurance of quality and safety.Page 47 of 55 Oconee Relief Request 12-ON-001 17.8 References None Page 48 of 55 Oconee Relief Request 12-ON-001 18.0 Weld WJ33 (Serial #N-32389-1) 18.1. ASME Code Component(s)
| |
| Affected Unit 1 Letdown Cooler SN# N-32389-1 Inlet Nozzle to Channel Body Weld WJ33, Summary Number PSI and ASME Code Class 1.18.2. Applicable Code Edition and Addenda ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section XI, 1998 Edition through the 2000 Addenda.18.3. Applicable Code Requirement IWB-2500, Table IWB-2500-1, Examination Category B-D, Item Number B3.150 Figure IWB-2500-7(a), 100% Volume Coverage of Examination Volume A-B-C-D-E-F-G-H-I.
| |
| 18.4. Impracticality of Compliance Component configuration:
| |
| a Surface 1: Stainless Steel Channel Body* Surface 2: Stainless Steel Inlet Nozzle* Diameter:
| |
| 3.0 in.* Thickness:
| |
| 0.875 in.This component was scanned manually using conventional methods. Scanning requirements are described in ASME Section XI, Appendix III, 111-4420 and III-4430. These requirements describe and are specific to scanning components in two axial and two circumferential directions.
| |
| This component was scanned to the extent possible to meet these requirements.
| |
| The aggregate coverage that was obtained is described and calculated from the following.
| |
| Base metal coverage using circumferential and axial scan coverage:
| |
| 450 shear waves and 45', 60' and 70' longitudinal waves in the S1 and S2 direction obtained an aggregate coverage of 60.1%Weld Material coverage using axial and circumferential scan coverage: 450 shear waves obtained an aggregate coverage of 49.1 %The total aggregate coverage was calculated to be (60.1% + 49.1%)/2 = 54.6%In addition, a best effort examination was performed using 600 and 700 longitudinal waves to the extent possible in the upper 2/3 area of interest.The impracticality was caused by the weld taper configuration of the inlet nozzle to channel body that does not allow meaningful interrogation from Surface 2 the inlet nozzle side. In order to scan the required volume for this weld, the channel body to inlet nozzle weld would have to be redesigned and replaced, which is impractical.
| |
| Page 49 of 55 Oconee Relief Request 12-ON-001 The Oconee Inservice Inspection Plan allows the use of Code Case N-460, which requires greater than 90% volumetric coverage.
| |
| Therefore, the available coverage will not meet the acceptance criteria of this Code Case.This relief request is specific to examination volume coverage limitations only. All other Code requirements were satisfied.
| |
| No indications were detected during this examination.
| |
| The reject box on each UT Calibration/Examination sheet is marked for internal tracking of the coverage limitation only.18.5. Proposed Alternative and Basis for Use No substitution alternative for this weld is available which would provide better coverage.
| |
| Radiography (RT) is not a desired option because RT is limited in the ability to detect service induced flaws. Use of other manual or automated UT techniques, whether conventional or phased array, were considered, but would not increase coverage due to the limitation created by the component configuration.
| |
| The use of any other UT technique available would incur the same physical scanning limitations.
| |
| 18.6. Duration of Proposed Alternative This request is for the duration of the fourth inservice inspection interval, currently scheduled to end on July 15, 2014.18.7. Justification for Granting Relief Ultrasonic examination of the weld for the item number PSI was conducted using personnel, equipment, and procedures qualified in accordance with ASME Section XI, 1998 Edition with the 2000 Addenda.The system leakage test performed each refueling outage in accordance with Table IWB-2500-1, Examination Category B-P requires a VT-2 visual examination to detect evidence of leakage. This test and VT-2 examination provides additional assurance of pressure boundary integrity.
| |
| In addition to the above Code required examinations (volumetric and pressure test), Reactor Building Normal Sump monitoring and other leakage detection systems provide additional assurance that, in the event that leakage did occur through this weld, it would be detected and proper action taken.Duke Energy has examined the weld to the maximum extent possible utilizing approved examination techniques and equipment.
| |
| Based on the acceptable results for the coverage completed by the volumetric examination, the pressure testing (VT-2) examinations required by Section XI, and the leakage monitoring, it is Duke Energy's position that the combination of examinations provides a reasonable assurance of quality and safety.18.8 References None Page 50 of 55 Oconee Relief Request 12-ON-001 19.0 Weld WJ35 (Serial #N-32389-1) 19.1. ASME Code Component(s)
| |
| Affected Unit 1 Letdown Cooler SN# N-32389-1 Outlet Channel Body to Chemical Connector Weld # WJ35, Summary Number PSI and ASME Code Class 1.19.2. Applicable Code Edition and Addenda ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section XI, 1998 Edition through the 2000 Addenda.19.3. Applicable Code Requirement IWB-2500, Table IWB-2500-1, Examination Category B-B, Item Number B2.51 Figure IWB-2500-1, 100% Volume Coverage of Examination Volume A-B-C-D.19.4. Impracticality of Compliance Component configuration:
| |
| * Surface 1: Stainless Steel Outlet Channel Body* Surface 2: Stainless Steel Chemical Connector* Diameter:
| |
| 8.620 in.* Thickness:
| |
| 0.875 in.This component was scanned manually using conventional methods. Scanning requirements are described in ASME Section Xl, Appendix III, 111-4420 and III-4430. These requirements describe and are specific to scanning components in two axial and two circumferential directions.
| |
| This component was scanned to the extent possible to meet these requirements.
| |
| The aggregate coverage that was obtained is described and calculated from the following.
| |
| * Axial scan coverage:
| |
| 450 shear waves and 450, 600 and 700 longitudinal waves in the S1 and S2 direction obtained an aggregate coverage of 97.2%* Circumferential scan coverage:
| |
| 450 shear waves obtained an aggregate coverage of 78.1%* The total aggregate coverage was calculated to be (97.2% + 78.1%)/2 = 87.7%* In addition, a best effort examination was performed using 600 and 700 longitudinal waves to the extent possible in the upper 2/3 area of interest.The impracticality was caused by the taper configuration of the chemical connector and the proximity of a nozzle within the scan area from the outlet channel body. In order to scan all of the volume for this weld, the chemical connector and location of the adjacent nozzle would have to be redesigned and replaced, which is impractical.
| |
| Page 51 of 55 Oconee Relief Request 12-ON-001 The Oconee Inservice Inspection Plan allows the use of Code Case N-460, which requires greater than 90% volumetric coverage.
| |
| Therefore, the available coverage will not meet the acceptance criteria of this Code Case.This relief request is specific to examination volume coverage limitations only. All other Code requirements were satisfied.
| |
| Three indications were detected during the examinations that were determined to be all from component geometry.
| |
| The indications were not associated with flaws in the component weld. All were acceptable without further evaluation.
| |
| The dispositions of all indications were by procedure guidance on the use of probe skewing, use of higher angles and indication plotting.
| |
| The reject box on each UT Calibration/Examination sheet is marked for internal tracking of the coverage limitation only.19.5. Proposed Alternative and Basis for Use No substitution alternative for this weld is available which would provide better coverage.
| |
| Radiography (RT) is not a desired option because RT is limited in the ability to detect service induced flaws. Use of other manual or automated UT techniques, whether conventional or phased array, were considered, but would not increase coverage due to the limitation created by the component configuration.
| |
| The use of any other UT technique available would incur the same physical scanning limitations, 19.6. Duration of Proposed Alternative This request is for the duration of the fourth inservice inspection interval, currently scheduled to end on July 15, 2014.19.7. Justification for Granting Relief Ultrasonic examination of the weld for the item number PSI was conducted using personnel, equipment, and procedures qualified in accordance with ASME Section XI, 1998 Edition with the 2000 Addenda.The system leakage test performed each refueling outage in accordance with Table IWB-2500-1, Examination Category B-P requires a VT-2 visual examination to detect evidence of leakage. This test and VT-2 examination provides additional assurance of pressure boundary integrity.
| |
| In addition to the above Code required examinations (volumetric and pressure test), Reactor Building Normal Sump monitoring and other leakage detection systems provide additional assurance that, in the event that leakage did occur through this weld, it would be detected and proper action taken.Duke Energy has examined the weld to the maximum extent possible utilizing approved examination techniques and equipment.
| |
| Based on the acceptable results for the coverage completed by the volumetric examination, the pressure testing (VT-2) examinations required by Section XI, and the leakage monitoring, it is Duke Energy's position that the combination of examinations provides a reasonable assurance of quality and safety.Page 52 of 55 Oconee Relief Request 12-ON-001 19.8 References None Page 53 of 55 Oconee Relief Request 12-ON-001 20.0 Weld WJ36 (Serial #N-32389-1) 20.1. ASME Code Component(s)
| |
| Affected Unit 1 Letdown Cooler SN# N-32389-1 Outlet Nozzle to Channel Body Weld#WJ36, Summary Number PSI and ASME Code Class 1.20.2. Applicable Code Edition and Addenda ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section XI, 1998 Edition through the 2000 Addenda.20.3. Applicable Code Requirement IWB-2500, Table IWB-2500-1, Examination Category B-D, Item Number B3.150 Figure IWB-2500-7(a), 100% Volume Coverage of Examination Volume A-B-C-D-E-F-G-H-I.
| |
| 20.4. Impracticality of Compliance Component configuration:
| |
| * Surface 1: Stainless Steel Channel Body* Surface 2: Stainless Steel Outlet Nozzle* Diameter:
| |
| 3.0 in.* Thickness:
| |
| 0.875 in.This component was scanned manually using conventional methods. Scanning requirements are described in ASME Section XI, Appendix III, 111-4420 and 111-4430.
| |
| These requirements describe and are specific to scanning components in two axial and two circumferential directions.
| |
| This component was scanned to the extent possible to meet these requirements.
| |
| The aggregate coverage that was obtained is described and calculated from the following.
| |
| 0 Base metal coverage using circumferential and axial scan coverage:
| |
| 450 shear waves and 450, 600 and 700 longitudinal waves in the S1 and S2 direction obtained an aggregate coverage of 60.1%* Weld Material coverage using axial and circumferential scan coverage: 450 shear waves obtained an aggregate coverage of 49.1 %* The total aggregate coverage was calculated to be (49.1% + 60.1%)/2 = 54.6%* In addition, a best effort examination was performed using 600 and 700 longitudinal waves to the extent possible in the upper 2/3 area of interest.The impracticality was caused by the weld taper configuration of the outlet nozzle to channel body that does not allow meaningful interrogation from Surface 2, the outlet nozzle side. In order to scan the required volume for this weld, the channel body to outlet nozzle weld would have to be redesigned and replaced, which is impractical.
| |
| Page 54 of 55 Oconee Relief Request 12-ON-001 The Oconee Inservice Inspection Plan allows the use of Code Case N-460, which requires greater than 90% volumetric coverage.
| |
| Therefore, the available coverage will not meet the acceptance criteria of this Code Case.This relief request is specific to examination volume coverage limitations only. All other Code requirements were satisfied.
| |
| No indications were detected during this examination.
| |
| The reject box on each UT Calibration/Examination sheet is marked for internal tracking of the coverage limitation only.20.5. Proposed Alternative and Basis for Use No substitution alternative for this weld is available which would provide better coverage.
| |
| Radiography (RT) is not a desired option because RT is limited in the ability to detect service induced flaws. Use of other manual or automated UT techniques, whether conventional or phased array, were considered, but would not increase coverage due to the limitation created by the component configuration.
| |
| The use of any other UT technique available would incur the same physical scanning limitations.
| |
| 20.6. Duration of Proposed Alternative This request is for the duration of the fourth inservice inspection interval, currently scheduled to end on July 15, 2014.20.7. Justification for Granting Relief Ultrasonic examination of the weld for the item number PSI was conducted using personnel, equipment, and procedures qualified in accordance with ASME Section XI, 1998 Edition with the 2000 Addenda.The system leakage test performed each refueling outage in accordance with Table IWB-2500-1, Examination Category B-P requires a VT-2 visual examination to detect evidence of leakage. This test and VT-2 examination provides additional assurance of pressure boundary integrity.
| |
| In addition to the above Code required examinations (volumetric and pressure test), Reactor Building Normal Sump monitoring and other leakage detection systems provide additional assurance that, in the event that leakage did occur through this weld, it would be detected and proper action taken.Duke Energy has examined the weld to the maximum extent possible utilizing approved examination techniques and equipment.
| |
| Based on the acceptable results for the coverage completed by the volumetric examination, the pressure testing (VT-2) examinations required by Section XI, and the leakage monitoring, it is Duke Energy's position that the combination of examinations provides a reasonable assurance of quality and safety.20.8 References None Page 55 of 55 Attachment A to Relief Request 12-ON-001 UT Detail Data sheets from 1EOC-26 Limited Exam Coverage Swunmary No.: Wo~scopw.Octnse I 01.83.110.0011 UT Calibratfor
| |
| -*nation Procedure:
| |
| Pmcedure Rev.Work Order No.:.01597677 Outage No.: 0146 Repit No.: UT-1".1770 Page: I of 1 Code: 1806120W CMaL/m: 9.0 /5"110 Locatlw: DrawN No.: lSS-OC1-2 DsAlpuon:
| |
| Noai to Shelf Syawm ID: 0 Component ID: ITZR-wP24 SIUMAeng:
| |
| ilThkblmsa kmet C/8.187163 5 UmitRatons:
| |
| 8a. atthd shta T"no: 1200 Fhns Time: 1207 Instrument se,,ing. search Unl, Cal-eulI No.: MOAT"T sedreal No..: C"c. jh out Manufacturer.
| |
| KRAUTKRAMER Manabjien K13A [rillia CII 1050 .4111120Six IA shape: Rdound IlFe 1y00 I 112i 1 DesaD: 1.0I"" rp. 10n Freq. U 8 Miz StPit: Ter-1 _ fEr. Cal, Mu Ca'e in Pww fth E Angle: .0 Sof SJ&Mmes: Skw ingl caAMem Oampbng: 1K' Me&et 0% Mode: -olo -ad 1306 Rep. Rate: Au Fmq4l an2 #An& aum~n~~ Coupwant puler bLed Mode: PE Wedge OWyl: Intagra CO. Baltch 0Dow Vobtge: flied Oither. FiWkvs Type: ULTRAGS-L Ax Gain (dB) 31.3 Chu. Gaini (dB) WA fearch Unf1 Cable Mt: SOMOTCH Sscewaa Div. -1.0 in of Bound Path Type: RG -174 Exam Batchi 320 Unerity No.: L-r1-13 _ Lengift v No. Cons. 0 Type: ULTRAGEL U maiuawn Block Scan Coverage Mig.: SONOTICH C&L Bok" No. 40338 Upabsown Dwmnem a Scan dB: 37.3 Rabic. slock Thickne L.187 Din.: a.7o0 CW Q CCW Sca d: N/A M Cal. SaL Temp. 71 Temp. MCNDE40127 Exa Surface: OD. Tyie: ROMPAS Comp. Temp. 768 Temp. T*o. MUCU4O12 Surbaoe Condilfn:
| |
| As Ground -ROM"-Recordable Indcat.ion(s):
| |
| Yes 0 No E (If Yes, Ref AMehed UlM slo Indicadcn Repcui)F -Axia Orientatd Search Una Calbadn sowa -VO Bwep S path.Ralior AM0&bde % ______ 1 fie 70 3.3 1 .3---. -CivuM nW ...letated Search U114 Cetheilen
| |
| ~at IPapth Raleetar Amplihud % ..a..on I m ami, soundm PA do ___Iwý'Il sw, so 1' 1./Resufts: AcceptQ0 Reoct4 info 0 Percent Of Coverage Obtained 2P W0%: No.. Reviwead Previous Date: Comet. N/A AIIACHENT PASE / f mmaoy No.;Wodmoopo: UT Calibratlor' natlon Oonuee .1 1 Procedure Rev.: rn Wo*order No.: NDH-og 6~01872 Outage No.: Ol.-ZO Report No.: UT-11-771 Pag 1 I f of Qod; CAL/Kom: n.. i@ Lmaon:__, Dlru~rQ No.: .C Norh. 'i Shel'Syte 1: 60 Comporwnt 1D: 1-PzR-WP264 SheI th: HIA Thmomeaslmato' CwSI.17P1*7.
| |
| Lkltin:~ so -See atlashed she*%s SWU TM. 1210 Finfsh Thu.: 122... ... .. .. ...m -.-Insbment GSlinmg Search Unit Serw No.: 0T.JXr S.i.. l No.: _t4_48_.__.
| |
| Manukaswwv ICRAUTKRAAIER maluactuor KRA Model UBN-6N0 ohm* WxA ,Mape: Ree." Dowar 11.31 Range; ILO Froq.. 2.25MHx "ll: .Gamman MiCUwI: .12141 PUhIW High Exam Angle: 4 #of Elements:
| |
| Single DampIng: 1K Reject 0% Mode: show Map. Rate: W- Fr-q. ' .UMHz .I d Angle: 45.FUtlar. Fixd Mode: .p. Wedge Style; , W Votage: -Fixed Odbar Fulwma , Ax. Gah (d): 441J2.1 CIt. Gain (dB) tWA S ch Undt Cable I Semen Dtv. v 1- UL of.t 8@uiwPam~
| |
| 1y',p RQ-I74 Uneafty Report No.: 38 ggtt V No. Cow,: 0 CaUbmallon Block Sowin Coverag cal. Block No. ...3. Upstem @ Omown Sa : Sn .1 Thlols I Die.: , 376 CW0 S do: SL1 Cal. s i. Temp. 71 Temp. Toot MC*.ND0127 E sSi: 0.... Co Comp. Temp. 76 Temp. Toot MCNDE401IM Surface Cocnhi: As Ground ecordable on): Y"a Q No 0 (U Yes, Ret. Atached Ulaw&nhlcaton Report.)Rsaull. Acept Q Reject fi ink Q Percent Of C~overvigo Obtaine , o0t: Him ROatwed P Wftouu W* De; yow.-~ I -I -' I 01 Tim.s Date Cheuka Ini"a Cal AGO NMIo1 finter. CaL 1210 4118M161 Irter. C&L _Inter. CaL. 4K13201 PQinal pi 300 4114=211 Coapbant CaL. Batats: 09M2 lype: ULTRAGELI M40.: soNclECH Exam a", 00=6.Tp: ULTPAGELU0 Mfg.: BONOTECII BeMW No.: 904622 Type: ROMPAS Axial Oslentated Search Unif*-Cammion 815111; S9weep In. so IA 2.24 218 25 3.0 4.70 vs8 M0o 4.6 6.19 Notch so 64.6 1 91* , .'- .,:, -, -.,I um r no I Ori w' 4..rif* Clromfe/rentia Out~stled Search Unit Ca,12Ra1m slonwf Swep Riefiector Ampliud S Ollsoii mwO~uldP Rderaiunenftiutator Block I'~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~0 IalnnnmlneIlhs1udpath1t,.-l an I 1.2 I 2.0 I. _____________
| |
| --- --1 -1 1 I_" -I;. 1 " I " I I *_I-I A11ACiIMENT A\PAGE ? OF 112 MSwmanoy 8rnmdy No-: WNU*: UT Callbratior, @ linatlon ocaee I ¶ Prooodure:
| |
| NDE,420 Outae No.: o0-__Report No.: UT,41-771 POP: 2 of 9 01.83&110.O011 Porcedure Rev.: Woc' Order No..ai1m7s77 IS'Code ~ 1Ir1o80000A Cmtem: 3.110 Locaon: Dmwkilg No0.: I-ONO2D~es eptin: Houzle to UheU.System ID: so Component ID; 1-PZR-WP20,3 N" " ' "' 'A* .. .... " ..... .uhbdons:
| |
| ._ gtdt'1e: d120 FIsh Time: 1122 Lim____ _____________Finish______
| |
| -Instrumern Seattns Serc Unit --im -ot Sail.] No.: oo"JxTr Saw No.: , , 141. ,.Manufacturer
| |
| ~ KRAUUTKRAMER Ma'jcg idlCt111041121 Mode' USM-" Size: .".0 Ihit5L CAw. 1120 411l12l"1 06ay. 14.0744 Rien: .0 Freq.: 2U Mlz 8toe: GAMMA .__' C -.hillCaWOI:
| |
| .1166 P*uutter Examu AI'gWK so soElementds:
| |
| Single. I~t Cal. 4111211112l 41182011 Dampbng: I- Rejoet 0% Mode: -.S "he _ -Rep. Rat.: Autchl Freq.: 26 MHx Meaued An&.: 40 coo t Flif.:r Fi,-d Mode: P Wedge Sly: ,CaL Beatch: 093M.vokai : .Fixed OQ. Puflwave Type: ULTuEo.'u Ax Gain (dB) 44:1 CQm. Gain (dB) 53.1 Searh Unit Cable Mtg.: SONOTBCH 1 3mw DJV. , 0 L iof 8ound Paith Type: RO -.174 E09m Batch as5 Unarl R t o.: ft; L-11-138 I .g L ... No. Conn" 0 T ype: ULTRAOEL I; 8ck .oen M4.: SONOT.CH CA Ilk" No. 40&U Upetrewm Dnstream Ea Scan di; L R56r1on k Thkckneos 7 Dli.: .. AFid. CWi0 CCW Fa Son dD: 68.1 SNW No- 9,M Ci.BDl.T*mp, 71 rtmp.Too:
| |
| MCNDSO402 Exam Su, oe: Ty.p: RO e -Comp. Temp. 7R. Tomp. Tool MCNDM4128 surface Condtion:
| |
| As Ground Rec-ordabl Itnd .eation(.):
| |
| Yea N No " (If Yes. Ref. Attaied Ubmlo hIdication Report.)Raeiis AcceptQ Reject ~ lnfoQ 0o'mn Axial Orlentated Searoh Unit Rde~or %DlvSoun 0md Path Retd Amsuo .o'" oo ra' So 2, ,,.0a8 L.o .0 2.V ILO 4.0-1wr 60 7.0 Clbumferontlei Ofontate earch Uni t --t Rsefasiwallsftulator Block G L I Olpu _I&"I &6 d ftIM dB Refhco~r MIoLtd ID-Ld --SI3 lias"rma ul 80 1. .1 2A.* .- .-i I-.I .. ..--I 't~ I .I..'PACE 3 uF/&..
| |
| Nleln SUMMiY NO.: Wockwtopa:
| |
| UT Calibration
| |
| .,-*nation Oconee I 1 Procedure:
| |
| O193.1.oL 0, P ,ooedWu, Rev.: 181 Work Order No.: NDH.820 6 01367477 Ouage No.: Oll-nS Rapo No.: _ 0.61-471 Pago: a Wi S, Cowe; ISSAIMOOA CaLJftwtn:
| |
| B-0 163.110 Location: Drawing No. 18404102Dmmption:
| |
| am]$ to shell system 11: so Component 1 ID:1-P9R4M8-3 -Sbwe ': "WA -h-m-/Oh.
| |
| *eer t I1 7"L75 Lbalstaona:
| |
| cc -Se aftusbed SheetS Skit Tbw. 1231. Findsh Tbiw ¶235", -i L n n I I " n l I I -u i .- + I ll I --inl Ins'maNetu etuing Iearan uirt!Seri No.: OOTJXT .Serlal No.: 0144"0 Manufadture KRAUTKRAMER
| |
| 'auaw ~ IA Molet 1... 40 aIre; ,Ix.. Shape: ROOt Delay: =4.74 RaNW: ZIA0 Freq., 2Z2 MHz 8"$: GAMMA MI Cal/Val: .123, Par.i Hjb Exem Angle: 60 is01 Elemnets' iLe Oamplng 1K Ruojct 0% Mode; -shear Rep. Rate. Aiftohh Fraq. 2.25 MHz Measaured Angle If0 Sit= Ffed Mode: PID Wocg 8 : 0". .voltage: Fixed Othen, Fialwave Ax Gain (d) 6C.62.. Cit. Ga (dS) 78. 8eih Unit Cable I ScreenW. ,., 2j i. of Bound P..th Typo: RI. -174 LUInty Report No.: L,4_-433 LeAth: ft No.Corm.:
| |
| o Callbraton Slock law Oemage Cml. Block No. 40. 3, Upstream 1 Downstream 0 Scan dB: 7 T1ile" I ODb-.: L76,. CWO CCW2i Scand8: 71.6 Cal. Sik. Temp. 71 Temp. Tool: CANIDE4,1,7
| |
| ,, Sfmf: OD..- .-Comp. Tomp. 76 Tqimp. Tool: MCNE,40128 Surface Condlilon' Ae Ground Reordtble lndicauiona.):
| |
| Yes Q No [ (it Yes,. Rat Ultraic ikwdiaon Repod)Reults: Accept Q 'Reject 0 Ino [)Percent Of Coveraget Obtained -P 90%, ______ Noa~ Aeevd____Dat; Cal. e checks .Tm a aio.al C 1100 41oo1er InwCal. -I =lFinlti Cal.11 1621:WS. Batoix Gem2 rype: -.TRAOEL q Aft.: SONOTEN.%)aM "tCh am2 rype: UL.TRAMEU Mfg.: SOWoTC-.h 01191nc 9eAn.,554522x ,-rmy: ,, OMPAS COMM : Axle Ofienlated BeArb IUnk CaI stm mom I nal Sam"ee ReeOBSON Amp~ltude
| |
| % Oeladn L :.Y;- --.I... , IN8 3O 1.1 31.4 2830 U. 6.54 318 10136 4.0 0." Natob go 50 12.15 511 1 I ,l 6.9 1 IO,,.2 Cloauntehnlik Oden4taed earch Unit Callbration Slgna 8Sweep dPa Ralleodr Ampilld. D~vdsio Gem- I %I -P WA I--.I -, ii i., rmandigibl so a .2AI:8. : !-,- hi 2.01.... f I i_AOTACHME.I A PASE q- OF t:?
| |
| 0 0 DUKE POWER COMPANY ISI LIMITATION REPORT ComponentlWold iD: 1-PZR-WP26-3 Item No: 01B3.110.0011 remarks: NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION Due to nozze Configuration.
| |
| [LIMITED SCAN 01 02 1l] cW ecw 2 _@ __ __FROM L N/A to L N/A INCHES FROM WO 1.0" to Beyond ANGLE: IZ 0 0 45 0 60 other FROM 0 DEGto 360 DEG -O NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION C] LIMITED SCAN 0 1 "] 2 E] 1 C 2 E] cw E- ccw FROM L to L INCHES FROM WO ..... toW .....ANGLE: -0 045 Q60- other. FRO._M DEG to DEG E" NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION Q LIMITED SCAN C1 02 01 E2 ] cw ccw FROM L .toL__ ,, INCHES FROM WO to .....ANGLE: 000 45 060 other FROM; DEG to -DEG[J NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION 0 LIMITED SCAN 0 1 El 2 1r 1 E] 2 El cw El cw UT-11-7n7 FROM L to. L INCHES FROM WO to Sketch(s) attached ANGLE: 0 0 00 5 0 other. FROM DEG to DEG I y N Prepared B.y. Mauldi' 1 L44 : Date: 04/1&11 Sheet 4.- Of 9 ew y. D1a"" //: ..A. tidzed Inspeotft; V ..... .....- , .1A. HkL~ i 1F P A I ýýWE -S 0 F 0 Item No. .I.B3.110.0011 Weld No.: WP26-3 0 Pm~sudwzr Sa -4 1 ing Nozile to Shell Inspector/Date:
| |
| Barr' Muirhead 411/11 Noz7le Surfiace 2 Base and Weld Metal Examined with 00 angle.% Examined 0* = 19.03 / 56.283 x 100 = 33.8%.o 19.03 sq. in.'r I N Shell Surface 1 I I PAGE (6 gF /,-
| |
| Item N66 Oi.LIX_.110.00 WeIdNo.: WP26-3 Inspector/Date:
| |
| BArr Muirhead 4/18/U utrizer Sampling Nozzle to Shell Base Metal &mined widi 60 ad 450 angles.% E1amýe 60 0 and 45* = 19.03 / 44.87 x 100 = 42.4%.6 0 Wand 45 0 Circ. scan m.19.03 sq. in".Sheu -SurfacelI I Ai tmtAi A PASI -7OF/ _
| |
| Item No. O1.B3.110.0011 Weld No. : WPl&3 P Pressurizer Samlin Noz71e to Shell 1 .0 Impector/Date:
| |
| Bar& Muirhead 04/18&Nozzle Surface 2 m Total Weld Metal Examined with at least 2 angles from one direction.
| |
| A combination of 45' and 600 angles vere used to obtain coverage.% Examined from Surfce 1 =7.015/ 11.413 x 100=61.46%.
| |
| % Examined fom Surface Z CW, and 0GW= 0%.Shell SSurfiice I 7.015 sq. i , AST , G 0 Item No.; -01B.UO.oo11 Pres Weld No.: Inspector/Date
| |
| : ]k hited41L surizer Sampling Nozzle to Shell 0 Total Bas Metal nined with at least 2 angles from one drction.A combination of 450 and 600 angles were used to obtain coverg.% Examined = (24.45 + 5.705) / 44.87 x 100 67.2%/600-- 24.45 sq. in.Shell x N. x x ..X .-- -- ---x x N11%-1 -I- -----at.. ý , ý ----..--..5.705 sq. PAGE C oF/ .M PZR Samplinf Nozzle to Shell % ofCoveral~
| |
| e b" C=4 v- .Item No.: 01,B3.110.0011 Weld No. : P26-3 Weld Coverage Scan St S2 Cw CCw 450 & 600 450 & 600 450 & 600 450 & 600 Total 61.46 +4-% CoveraaeObttied 6140 0 0 6.1.46 15.4% Coverage Bae aterialCoverage Si cw & ccw 450 & 600 450 & 600 Total 67.2 424 109.6 109.6 + 2 00 Scan Coveraee% Coverage% Coverage 33.8 Aggregate Coverage = Weld + Base Material + 0P + 3 34.7% oeale Inspector
| |
| / Date: Page _I of __q 01111 MOM_Summary No.: Workcope: UT Calibratlor
| |
| -Onlnatlon Outago No.: 01-26 Report No.: UT-11-72 Paea: 1 of .1:.Oconee I Procedure:
| |
| Prooeduro Rev.: Work Order No-.NDE4140 61897577 code: .i. ... 19- -Ca..lt. .: 90 3.1114 L*cation-Drawtin No.: 181.OCNI-002
| |
| -oeafpdom Nlzzl, td Shell System ID: g0 Component ID: .-PZWP2.-7 -SheLongti:
| |
| 1A Th.ck n ator CS 1 _7M.75 Umltations:
| |
| See T1 report StWar Time: 1208 Finish Time: 1215---- .E I n n _ _ _ I _. i n .. ..... .. .... i " ._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _". ,i .-_ _Inlrmn etig erhUhCol.
| |
| Tmes ot Axial orientated Search Unit S.a. No.: jXT SeW, N o.: C I200 SP C h ocks : S s we. p -n P g .--Manu.c..er KRAUTKRAMER .KRA I Sol 0 4 = .Reflectio Amlitde% Dwpon .mom: UBN.,0 -11d* _1i.. Shap:. Round Inter. Col. 1200 .4112016 2` 1. 14 ..Dely. 1.039 Range: 1 Freq.; 2.26 MHz Ste: Gamma -.t 2e 70 -3. 3.3 M'k CalVit .233 Putn.'L .H10 Exam Angle: 0 #of Elements:
| |
| Single r CO '1 4n.c .a 6A I...* -'---'- "--1:, Ifna Co 1-13.5,L41O I .Dampno 11K Aelp 0% .,Mode: Log.-Rep. Rate: Autohlgh Freq.: 2.28 MHz Measured Ange: W/A. Couplont Filter , Fixed Mode: P
| |
| * Wedge Style: ...i. h l Col. Batch: 05 CrumfentaI Orientted Search Unit Voltage: Fixed Other. FuIlwave Type: ULTRAOEL N Calibraon Signal Sweep BoLu-dPath Ax. Gain (dB .31.3 Cim Gain (dB): .....N/A Search Unit Cable Mft: SONOTECH Reflector Ampitude #A Dlvtslon Screen Dlv, 1,0 Ib. Kof pound Patm Type: RG -174 Exam Batch'. 09... N*A Lineaity Report No.: t38 No. Conn., -. 0 Type: ULTRAGEL -Callraton Blook SoonCoverage Mfg.: 8ONOTECH Cal. Block No. 40338 Upstream D Downstream oo San dB: 37.3 Refe ulock Refarencel8knulstot Block ThIckmoas 8.1e7 oDi.: 5.r74 CW- CCW-IScan dSo: N/A Gaff, Ser nal I Svweopn d Path______ ________ -Serial No.: 96622-e dB Reflector', Ampfttudo
| |
| %S I M SondP Cal. SIX. Temp. 71 Temp. Tool. MCN0240127 Exam OD ...... pe,: ROMPAS 14.I BW I 0 1.0 1.0 Comp. Temp. 78 Temp. Tool: _MCNDC..40128 Surae Ccrond : Am I lcund l Recordable lndlcstleo4):
| |
| Yes 0 No 0 (if Yes. Ref. Attached UltrasonIcndication R0PcrL)-Resufts: Ace pl Reject E Info 0 Comments:
| |
| WA Percent Of Coverage Obtained 3 90%: No Redeiived Previous Data: 'Yafs Examiner Levelk-Mulrtr Barry A. A Other Lavel WA Data..ab NIA -IJ'PASE /I Of ~
| |
| summary No.: UT Calibration A. ation S Oconee J I 01.83 Al0.0012 IS'Procedure:
| |
| Procedure Rev-, Work Oid~r No.: NDE-820 0 Oit No.: 01-2 Repit No.: UT-11-773 Peag: I a f *Code: 199000A CatJtem: 9.0 /B3,tt0 Location: Drawig No.: l81-OCN.-002 DeascripticuNk.xe to Shelf System ID: 80 Componei ii: 1iimR.WP264 Seftu..i i MIA ThlcIm[s/Diarnten CSMI$71575 Umitatlons:
| |
| Yes -See affached St Time: 1223 Fb*hTbme:
| |
| 1230 Instrument BSo. _ S earch Unk -a. I -s, Goo ,nt Seul No.: ,1 7 Seia N.-o.: 014818 Chieckw -CADIa ld sea Sc.. Pa.th:RAUTKRAMER K1A Intial Cod, ion4H lv've.r Amplittde'llfcl'
| |
| ..en .Pt lodel, USN48 Shm: LA.. Shape: Rect Inter. Col. 1216 ..1 81 80 IA 2.24 Delay: 11.81 RAng: I". PFuq.- Z.5Mlx Style: GaMA -ner Col -218__ 38 3.0 4.70 Mill CaIwel: .1268 Pulow High Ezmn Angle: 46' #of EIawnents$Sw nter. I SiB 1 20140 4.8 .09 Damping: W, , Reject 0% Mcd,: st,, .F l Cal 1300 4Show11 N 35 8'6 Rep. Raste: Autshi Fr"q.: 2. MHz Measured An&: 4 , C1U5et 182.1 Filter Fixed Mode: PE Wedge 84* .we Cal. Batch: 0M925 Search Unit Voltae: Fixed Olthw Pullwava Type: ULTRAGEL II Callraiona Sipne Sweep swmpt Ax. Gain (df) 46.1*t. Cuo Gahi (dB) I/A seh Un"t Cable Mfg.: SONOTUCH Refler Amplitde %, Wskin I Sreen Div. a CS tn. of Bound Path Type: R0174 Exam Batch , 9m25 Linn*dl Report No.,: 1.4I1-1138 Le.w9th: 6' .No. Con.n _ Type: ULTRAGEL 1 Callbrathm lca k -Scan Cweream M.: SONOTECO .. ...__ -.-Cal. Block No. 40W !.Uipstrm 20 Downtsmn Ea Scands:--8"1 Reference Block "RdeRmnllimuld Block ThIct"ese 7 Dt. .£8 W CCWO Scan dS: 661 eIo Gain J ps $w Sondaat____________
| |
| No.:a __0___$22 d8 Refetdor Amno Welon CaL a&k Temp. _71 Temp. Tool. MCM0E40127 Exwn Surface 00 Tym: ROMPA8 322_ r Ridu so 1. 0 Comp. Temp. 7T8 rmp. Took: MC..2NDI6I Surfe CDofldton:
| |
| As .r.oud -I Recordable Indlcetlon(s):
| |
| Ye C] No 0 (If Yes, Ref. AMcled. Ulftaonlc lndWaton ReOPx) ., Resuls: Accept [] Reject Info E) Cornmenta:
| |
| PercoM Of Coroege Obtaise l 90W%: No. Reviwed Pffvlos Date: Y,, Examiner La/ IM. DaftD Mauldvin, Luffy L-Examnerw Le iI-N 7 0 PAha". at Muirliand, Barry A.1 Other Leve W/A Strnatum I NIA ___________________________________A E-PAGE 12 oF142 0 Summary No.: Worfkoope:
| |
| UT Calibration
| |
| -9Jination Oconwe I ..01.3.I1t0.0012,'!81 Procedure.
| |
| Procedure Rev.: Work Order No.: Outage No.: 01-n Report No.: UT4 l- .NDE.820 6Ie.I0 01577 Codev: 1 20 .Cat.,twm:
| |
| -1. 10 -SO Location: i il l il+ " "I~~ ~ ~ ~~i" " + .I ... .. .4 .i i + + .i Drvwtnig No.: IS-CNI-OZ " Drption: Noimd tc 8hell System ID: s0 Componert ID: I-PZR-iP21.7 S... .1znglh: " ^ Th" Me"'" -ameter. CSI.19.7J5., LUmitatfo:
| |
| Ye -S4e attached heets Stardtme: "a112 FIbfh 7lme: 1150 Cal. ...e ,ateNo.: ofTfXT Manuboturer
| |
| ..... ATRAME " Model: USH-40 -.Delayr 14.07" R"g. ax0 MV CoiNe: .1268 .b .Hige Damplng: IK Reject: 0%Rep. Rate: 4qfth_ Freq.: 2.25 MHz.Fiter FIX Mods: PE Voltage: Fixed Other iulwave A& Gain (do) 4,,4. cOr. Gabi (d):' 5m.I Some.n ON. = J In. of Sound Pfl iLhneady Report No.: .L-41-138 .Cailbraon BIoBok aoware, UMi Sedal No.: 01481.Mwufaour KR aim:_ J11.0 shape: Fe.q.. .L251 MR&a : EX&M Anle: 160 #of l Mode: S. hear Meared APOW: .Wedge Owl Search Unit Cable Type: R t- 174 Lstoh: "' NoCn..scn Coverage 9 Checcs __Ro. Artder. CL. 1120 4I1. 11. I Inte, Inr Owei ,al111 211-Cal 131 F21.I I 1 Couaptant Cal. Bab*t 09388 Type: uumAeLuv Mfg. SONOlICH' Sam.c 0535_____ Type. U! RAl L I I Mfg.: SONOTECH , Axial Oiterasted Search Unit Car Sial 'SA"we , ReflectOr Amplitude 9% Divis U Pat" " 80 's 2.0 1.0 I ... .-40 0 " .o of8 451A. 3.0 2.w" 4Ao a.o ..0 19T__ .0 7.0 3A42 cmlmentUa Orkentated Search Unit-.. -" Cadibratlt Sipal Sweep f~WPt Reflector Apide% Dvso lteftraa.Sncflrnulator Block- -~-da-A909 .isin- un~Cal. Block No. 403388 Up-a Downseamf i Scan dS: 5161 ' Refno" Black Thkness r Die..: .. Flat CW l CCW 0 scan dis: .1 SerialNo.:
| |
| is Cl. 5Temp. 71 Tomp.Tool:
| |
| MCN0o40 Eemu Surtae: O. .. ... Type: IOMI_Camp. Temp. 70 Temp. Tool: MCNDE401IZ8 e Conlon: .As Ground Recordable indlaion(,):
| |
| Y'e D No R (If Yes, Re. Af.ached Uftwt indloatton Report.)Reaubte: Accept [] Reject @ Ifo 0 Comments: Perent Of Covae ,'0,: INo _W_- , R*wd PreviousD ..Y".e -n 3s-. ~lr vtodt.l so 1 &0 1 2.0 I Sumntry No.: Wodfscaps.
| |
| UT Callbration 9 nination Ocanas I 01E3.110.0012 181 Outag No.: .0148l Report No.: uIT-114m-M Page: 3 of I Procedure:
| |
| Pwcedum Rev.: Work Onier No.: N0E4120 01897577:Code: 11lh2004A Catmltom; 1-0 13.110 Loca1t: Drawing No.: I81d.0CN1,02 Deddton: Nozzle t6 ah,'System ID: 50 Component ID: 1-PZR-WP26-7 S NwLeng: WA ThIclumeDlameteor C81&.87175 i-mitations:
| |
| Yes -8De attached shests start Tane 1239 Finsh Time: 1246-" '" ' " Il l it .Il 1 .ri n .Eii ' II I I .II I Inwumntu uetwig searcn unit 0141eto Seria No.: OGTJXT SeOWa Ift Malutsaoww:
| |
| KRAUTKRAMIER Model: 1Us"0 SIZe.* .U Doiaer 14.0744 Run.: -211.0. Pmeq- 2.25 1411Cal/Ve
| |
| .1288 Putaer High~* Exam Anigle: Dampkng: tIx Reject. 0% .We: Rep. Rate: Autithigh Fuq.: 2.28 Mtm Measured Ang MBA 1.0 SMPe: Re, .MHz Style: GAMMA 60 111ofElenments:lnl Shear is:S Cal.Checks In"ta Cal Inter. Ca.Inter. Cal.ITZ cal Time Do" 10o I, lmoii L 1231 411/82011-I -1U31 41MM1 Couplard Cdbmtimal Si W Swee S Pauh.218 30 2. 6.54 3m 1I 4AI 0.96 No.th I so U I 115 N* 1 s " I I1M.8 Axial Orientated Search Unit Flaner Fixed Mode: P9 Wedge Style: .. Cal. Batch: 09325 Voltage: Fixed 0h.,r Putlmie Type:, ULTRAGEL U Ax. GCan (dB): 56.616 Cbro. GaIn (dl) 7. Search Unit Cable Mfg.: SONOTMCH 1 Saon Dwv. -2.5 in. of sound Path Type: RG -174 F1 Ih ._______Unea zly Repor l No.: L 14 38 IV. .No. Coa n. 0 Type: ULTRA GUL -I SeanCovraTepeg:
| |
| SONTRAECH1 Callbndlon Block 80an coe" : .NOTECH Cal. Block No. 40338 Upetren R Downstream
| |
| &I Scan dB: 76.6 Raftrencs Blok Thk a. O we.: 5.78 CW o CCWll Scan dB: 7&6 Serial No.: 984822 CUl. Bk. Temp. _71 TOMw. Took MCNDO4W127 Exam C.D. Type: ROMPA , Comp. Temp. 78 Tamp. Toot MCNDMtC128 Ureface Condhlo. As Ground Recordable Indloeuton(s)
| |
| Yes Q No ja (it Yes, Ref. Aftched Ultr1aslonicaton Report.)Porents: Accept "] Reject 0 Info Q Commenta .Pemrce Of Coverage Obtained > go%: A0N Reviewed Pravloua Date: .Yea Clcwufewnthd iOrletated Searoh Unit"."- iii -I I I
| |
| .0 0 K-DUKE POWER COMPANY ISI LIMITATION REPORT I Component/Weld ID: 1-PZR-WP26-7 Item No: 0LB3.110.0012 remarks: Z NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION Due to nozzle configuratlon.
| |
| JLIMITED SCAN ED 1 0 2 0 1 02 0 cw 0 ccw FROM L N/A to L N/A INCHES FROM WO 1.0. to Beynd -ANGLE: 0 0 ED 45 [0 60 other. FROM 0 DEGto 360 DEG El NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION Cl LIMITED SCAN C] I [1 2 j 1 I0 2 [1 Cw C3 ccw FROM L to L INCHES FROM WO to ANGLE: 0 0 0145 [] 60 other FROM DEG to DEG-NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION QLIMITED SCAN 0 1 E2 Eli 2 [D1 cw __1__ _ _FROM L to L INCHES FROM WO to ANGLE: 00 [0 45 0 60 other FROM DEG to DEG o NO SCAN Ml LIMITED SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION 011 02 C]l02Clcw 0ccw UT-11-773 I Sketch(s) attached FROM L to L 4 INCHES FROM WO to ANGLE: 0 00 5 other FROM DEG 0 yes El No I1'A11ACHMENT P.FASE/ 15 F/g 0 0 Itemn No; O1.B3.110.0012 Pr San~ ing No.zzle to Shell Weld No.: WP26-7 Inspector/Date:
| |
| Barry Muirhead 4/18/11--] Base and Weld Metal Examined with 00 angle.% Examined 0* = 19.03 / 56.283 x 100 = 33.8%.0 Nozzle Surface 2 Go A 19.03 sq. in.Shell Surface I I.I 1. 1. 1. 11 11 I WTACHREN, A[
| |
| 0 0 Item No.: 01.B3.llO.0012 Wdd No.: WP26-7 Inspector/ate:
| |
| ar Muirbmd 41811%Muwr Sampling Nonle to Shell Ba= MeWa Examined withi 60* an 450 angles% Examined 60 0 and 451 = 19.03 /44.87 x 100 =42.40/o 60JOnd 45 0~irc. scan 19.03sq, in. .N Shell e- r. t- t- W.. W. -L- e. el v C, CM cm em v. V Ir IV rr el V Rr Rr r V V V, Ir T T Ir -N.f AIIA~UIw A 0 Item No.: 01M3.110.0012 Ii'fl Wdd No. : Wp26-7 hupector/Date:
| |
| Barr Muiziead 04/1/MU Ussurizer Sampling Nozzle to Shell SNztl2 M Total Weld Metal Examined with at least 2 angles from one direction.
| |
| A combination of 450 and 60' angles were used to obtain coverage.% Examined from Surface 1 =7.015 / 11.413 x 10 = 61.46%.% Examined from Surface 2, CW, and CCW = 0%.Shell Surface I----------
| |
| X IX X %" X , 1ý 1. X ý% Xý- ..7.015 sq. PAE/6Q.;O 0 Item No.;: o1.B3.uo 0012 Prese Weld No.: 27 .Inspector/Date:
| |
| Barry Muirhead 4/18/11 w* ,-0 surizer Sampling Nozzle to Shell..0 M Total Base Metal Examined with at least 2 angles from one direction.
| |
| A combfnation of 450 and 600 anges were used to obtain coverage.% Examined = (24.45 + 5.705) / 44.87 x 100 = 67.2%o 60,'24.454s.
| |
| in.Shell Sur1~ce1 I 11 ------------.T.. V. C. .IV, C, Ir, R 5.lO5sq."'I-PAS6 ; QF//,2.
| |
| PZR Sampling Nozzle to Shell % of Coverage'-N b.aJc~0 U--Item No.: 01JUI,1M.0012 Weld No. : Weld Coverage Samn SI S2 Cw cCw 450 & 600 450 & 600 450 & 600 450 & 600 Total O/1 Coverae Obtained 0 0 61.46 61.46 +4=154% Coverage Base Material Coveraue S&CW &CCW 450 & 600 450 & 600 Total 67.2 42.4 109.6 54.8 33.8 109.6 +2 =00 Scan Coverafe% Coverage% Coverage Aggregate Coverage = Weld + Base Material + 00 + 3-34.7-n --c-o,,,Date
| |
| -/% Coxerag-e Page -YOf --I 0 makt SIUnlt: Summary No.: Worksoope:
| |
| 0 UT Calibratloni.-
| |
| amination 0 m°Ocorl..O99lei02 ,11.Procedure:
| |
| Procedure Rev.: Work Order No.:.PDIUT-2 018977741 Outage No-. 01-25 Report No.: , T-11-757 page: A1 d., I Code:.Drawing No.: Syt=em ID: s0 Component ID; t-F Limitations:
| |
| Ye4 119=W200A ISI-OCNI-009 I I I CwaLtem: 3-J 153.11 Deeaplo Nozzea to Safe End Locaton: I -See attached sheets-WA start Trme 1400 Thicknewf~aretor~
| |
| SSIL333.5 FkIIh Time: 1418 Instrument Settng* search-CWL Time Debe Seial No.: 014738 Serial No.:. 01FIOK Check-Manufacturer KRAUTKRAMER Manufaolune:.
| |
| KA nitial Cal 1340 411712011 Modal: USN4-0 8aW 81e: .. Shape: Round nter. .al Defaer 5.847 Range: _____ ____ .M 8qt .2 .ye:-_Compe.0
| |
| .r.Ca.u 1359 711 MV CaIN: .1211 Pulsar Squa" Exam Angle: 48 of Elements:
| |
| Single -r. Cal I Damping: 600 ReJec 0% Fihee"al Cal 1550 411713l91 Rep. Rate: .Autoblg Freq.: 2.26 MHz Meamsur Angle: __ .___.4,1"_
| |
| _. Couplent F~br Fixed Mode: Pe " Wedge St ..e. MsWoC Cal. Batch: 6.0=1 Voltage: 4d0 Other. FuWwvo Type ULTRAGEL U Ax. Gain (dB) 27.7 Cb'. Gain (d0) 27.7 Seafrh Unit cwbl Mfg.: 60NOTECH t Screen Div. c .8 In. of SOu"d PaH Type: RO -174. Exam Batch 9"M Uneadfy Report No.: L-11-142 I".* IL No. Conn.: 0__ ....._Type:. ULTRAGEL a 'Cal W lon S~e osan Coverage .ONOTECH CaL. elok No. 40397 Upstream wonstream Q Scan d8: 40 Refernc Sbak Thickness
| |
| &000 i-, Rd CW CW fSan dB: 40 Swa No.: 044 CaL Bic. Tamp. 7_.0 Temp. Tool: MCMDE40136 Exam Surface: O.D. Type: ROM PAS Comp. Temp. 76 Tamp. Tool: MCNDE401$i Surface Conditon An Ground Reoordable Indication(s):
| |
| Yea Q No [a (if Ye. Ref. Attached Ulrasoft ,ndkcaton Report.)Results: -Reject 2 Info I- Conments:
| |
| NIA P AS E a I Of summary N.Weeksoope:
| |
| UT Calibrationm..amination Oconoe I I 01.59.11.0029 181 Pxmcdum: Prceadure Rev.., Work Order No.: P0I-UT-2 01897774 Outage No.: 01-211 Report No.: UT-111-757 Peag: 2 of 8 Code: CatJltem:
| |
| 9-1J 19.11 Locaion: Orawng No.: 1I8-OCNI-.009 Dea1pono Nozzle to Safe End System ID: so Component I1: 1-P1314 eeenth: WA ThlnesOamlehater.
| |
| 85/23.6.5 Urnltatlona:
| |
| Yea -See attched sheets Star Time: 1417 FinIsh Tlmec 1421 Insat ment GoUings Search Unit Col. STim e D ate souft No.: 014738 Seqala No.: 380708 Cheocks ____da -.r. -wi -at Manfacturer
| |
| ~ KRAUT1CRAMER Manuhactuter KM "RANual Cal 1L345 41171201 Aeleolar %Model: USN-GO SW Sb Shape: Round Iner -O W4 581)" '1111).8 Derlay. 5.293 Range: 10 -req.: ..2.2 MW Style: COMP- Ines C& 1416 4A17/211--
| |
| M111 CaV: .1225 Per Square Exam Anq. so # Elements:
| |
| Iingl"- -..., -.-Damping: n00 ReJoo. 0% MIdw. Shear _ hal Cal 1 Rep. Ro,: _Aut Fq.: 2. 25 MHz Meaurd Ar: _______.._.
| |
| _ -FI'r Mom PBE Wedge Stye: M8WQC Cal. Batch: wie,.o, cht orlsetedarets Unit Voltage: 450 Ol0W. FuliWave Type; ULThAGEL U Cmtiwo Sige sweep Ax. Gain (dB): 45.3 CIM, Gain (d0) NIA Search Unit Cable Mfg.:. SONOTECH , I.Screan .. 1.0 11-_ .Of Sound Pah Type: RG -.1174 Exam sat 0" W', A " Linearity Report W.: L. 1-142. Length .,, No. Conn.: "ryp: .ULTRAGEL "11- --Calibration Block scan Coverage Mf. sONOTECH , Cal. Block No. 40307 UpaireUm E DOawwfl Q 8w dB: 61.3 , ., r Block Thlimee 3000 D~e: FatCW C CCWQ] Scan dB: MIA 0.77d IRe aterI fid d Osww Bound Path Cal. 81k. Temp. -L reTep. Tool- MCNO94ISO EXar SWOac0. Type: ROMPAP -15.0 8 -Camp, Temp. ye Temp. Tool. MCH013401131 Surface Condillor As round- II I Recordable Indkcafen):
| |
| Yes E] No O (f Yes. Ref. Attachd Ultrasonic Indication Report.)Results: Accept Q Rejed Info Comments:
| |
| WA Pecent Of Covem Obtalned D 90%: No Reviewed Pmrvm DOat: Yes Examiner Level IIN S -Ignatur Date ReV~wL intr Date Exasniner Level gI.N Date Site Review VSintr Day.ý Joh. C. .A M 2:. 4/1712011 01A Other Level WA fdae A.NI Review ,a...(lj .... ..X r/A ) '''W J~Vi V.PASEJL UT Calibration
| |
| ,.,amination
| |
| __St_/Un_
| |
| __ o ____._. I 1 Procedure:
| |
| PDI4.JT-2 Outage No.: 01-26 Summary No.: 01.BS.11.001 Procedure Rev.: E. Report No.: UT-l-.TI5 Workdcope:
| |
| -8i Wo n Order No.: 01897774, Page: 3 of a Code. 199812000A CatJItem:
| |
| B-J IB9.11 Location: DrMaIng No.: 1S-OCNI40W Deesipton:
| |
| Nozzle to Safe End -" 'System ID: d0 Component ID: 1-P111 SIle ,.ngth: NIA 5S,,, .3J5 Umrntntona:
| |
| Yes -See attached aheats Stait Time: 14V7 Finish Time: 1435 Inabn.mnt Setngs SONrh Unit C L Tit" Date .A 0 1 a U.S ariul No.: 014736 Serai No.: SE035S Checks --.S.n.. S-_Manufactawec KRAUTKRAMER Marudiacturen
| |
| -Initia Cod 1350 411712011
| |
| -Model: USN-0 8W Stze: Shape. ha .Round Iner. Cal. V1 4so. S0 J -.9 D.lr.y 9.5. 3 Ranp e: In Preq.: 2.25. 5 ,I ' Style: comp -g .-.1421 411 712011 -'_ " --M10 CaIVel: ..1226 Pulon. Squar Exam Angle: To 0 of Sgle1- -____20 1 __" amping: 500 Rej 0%.. .il 5 ,Sheer .....-Rep. Rate: Fmq., 2.25 Mltz Mesured Angle: 70. Couplant ,,,_-_, _Fiter Fixed Mode: .P..9.- Wedge Style: MeWQC CaL Batch: 00325. Unit-.u Voltage: 480 Othier Fuulwants Type: ULTRAGELO 619 8mVate SiPalathe Ax. Gain (d6) so Cbv. Gain (dB) IVA search Unit Cable MIl.: SONOTECH , e Amp.iuft .... S SemenDV. a 1.5 I .Of SoundPath Typew- RG -174 ..Exam Batch 00325. NA-U:.uri.y Report No. L-11-142.
| |
| Length: V No. Conn.: 0 Type: ULTRADEL II *-Calibrtion Black scan Cowerae Mfg.: .,ONOTECH CaL Block No. 40397 .. ..Upstream 5a Downsvtram Q Scan d8: e e nce Black bhiU5p0l8thl5.tar Bleak Thoua ro l.:_______
| |
| O COW QScan dB: IVA Gain Signal SapSufdPt Thickness U00 DID.: -" Serial No.: ..--" IOI Aiipetcre Div n a CaL. k. Temp. 756 rmnp. Tool: MCNDE40138 ExD Surface:., O.. Type: ROMPA8 17.. illI So I.7 I " COmp. Temp. 76 Termp. Tool: MCND41IS6 SuWUaoe Conlon"..
| |
| As Ground I Recordablelndication(, Yea s No f (IfYes, Ref.Ataod"Ultawot IndlcationReport) 7 Results: Accept C] Reject & Info Q Comments:
| |
| NIA Peroet Of Coverage Obtaind , 90%: Na Reviewed Previous Da: Y .-_.Uxmnr Lvel IlNOt eiwrSgaueData NIelle, Jacob I11m N ]I I l Exaniner Level , D-te St. Reiew S.i.ture Date'bay, John.,C. 4117201 P 1..other Level NIA .ANII Review Dat WA /1e~~cYw(4~
| |
| PAGE z; QE/Li..
| |
| m~ -SawUnII Summary No.: Worltscope:
| |
| UT Caflbration),.amination Oconee. .01.89.111.0029 lei Procedurow Procedure Rev.: Work Order No.: P0140.T2 Outag No.: O0-46 Report No.: UT.I1-757 Page: 4 of a 01807774 Code. 19981=0AM Cat.Rtem:
| |
| 8.4 A39.1 1 Location: Drawing No.: IS1OCNI.00 Deaalption:
| |
| Nozzle to Sae. End System 10: so Component ID: 1.PI81.0 Slzelnungth:
| |
| IVA Thikess/Diaineter, 8512.3=18.
| |
| Limitations:
| |
| Yes -See attached sheets Start Time: 1437 Fhdali Time: 1443 Instru.. .. Settngs Search Unit -- Date Sewial No.; 014738 Serdal No.: .98-298 I I -1 ! .-I KRAUTKRAMER m'nukubw.
| |
| RTSD i C -l 113B5 4712,'J mode: us"o SW .SIM: 2(Zx4 'Shpe: .,c. Inte. 'Cal.Delay, 11I.61 Range: 1req.: 2.0 MHz .si. *: I nter. Col. 1436 4M1T12011 Moal. UeSe 4,, 0 S ._ .. .... ...e ..... .... .r. C, al. -MW .234 Pulser: Square Erm Angte: .s # of Elements:
| |
| Dual Inter. Cal..Damping: S00 Reject 0% Mods: Long.i I ..18 Rep. Rate: Autehigh Freq- 2 MHz Measured Angle: pCouplant FlIer Fixed Mode: Pa., Wedge Style: .. nt , Cal. Batch: 00325 Voltage: 480 Fulim Type: ULTRAGEL II, Ax. Gain (dB) 82.4 Cho. Gain (dB): PUA Search Unit Cable Mfg.:. " ONOTECH Scren Div. -.1 K of Sound Path Type: RG -.14 Exam Batch 0325 Linearity Report No.: LP11-142 ......6!L No. Con. 0___ Type:. ULT. RAdfL ff Cellbrut)en Block Scan Coverage Mfg.: SONOTECH CaL Block No. 40317 IJp*eam 5 Downstream 1 Scan dB: 62.4 Reerence block Thickness "DO Dla.: Flat CW0 CCW W Soon dB: W41 Serial No.; 04-8711 Cal, Blk. Temp. TO Temp. Took MCNDPAO13
| |
| .Exam SwubM O.D; _Type: ROMPAS Comp. Temp. 7s Temp. Too: MCNDH4O136 Surace Condition:
| |
| As Ground Recordable IndlrAteon(t)
| |
| Yes f' No R (If Yes, Rea. Aathed Ultrasonlc Indloation Repwt.)Results: Accept f Reject [] Info " Q Comments:
| |
| NWA Percent Of Coverage Obtained ; 90%: No Reviewed Previous Data: Yes efetrAmoitide S. DMalo Pam Cft=%Nnbretl Orknentatd~eareh Un:Calibraton:
| |
| SW.na GWeeP .ftf~t~ Aniptld YbDcio ZLfto Iiit d4t2 Radiuslc 60pis 11o A11AtUMEN1 P, PAGE 2q OF,!ý
| |
| )I*I'-0 I DUKE POWER COMPANY ISI LIMITATION REPORT Component/Weld ID: 1-PIB1-9 Item No: O.B9.11.0029 remarks: 9 NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION Due to cawt material on pump 0 LIMITED SCAN 1 0J2 0 1 D 2 [D w ccw side.FROM L N/A to L N/A INCHES FROM WO CL to Be"rd ., ANGLE: 00 0 45 0 60 othef'r._
| |
| FROM 0 DEG to 360 DEG-NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION E0 LIMITED SCAN 01 02 [0 1 -1 2 0 cw ccw _ _ _ _ _FROM L __ Ito L INCHES FROM WO to _ANGLE: [3 0 45 060 other. FROM. DEG to. DEG El NO SCAN. SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION 0 LIMITEDSCAN 01 02 J-1 J2 -cw ccwm FROM L tol1 INCHES FROM WD 1to ANGLE: 0 0 45 0"1 60 other FROM -DEG to DEG 0 NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION El LIMITED SCAN 0 1 01 2 0 1 0 2 cw [I ccw UT-11-757 FROM L NfA to L- N/A INCHES FROM WO 2.2' to Beýnd Sketch(s) attached 4 ANGLE: 0 00 5 060- ofter 80RL FROM: 0 DEG~to 360 DEG 0 yes 0 No'Prepared By: Ja:cob R.H ols L'.e I: .Date: 0411711 She .t .5 of 8 R.v.. .y Data: s. ... D.yI AlU~thMENT1 A PAGE,2S Of V 0~Supplemeh,., Report 0 Report No.: Page: Summary No.: 01.59.11.0029 Examiner.
| |
| Ho*ls,.Jlcob Examiner.
| |
| Day, Johm. C.Olher: 1A im i I Levet U.N.Level: N/Level: M/A Ravlower.Site Review.ANDI Review.~'AA IJT-I1-757 Odae: .I(I I Ill. m I I IF Comments: Sketch or Photo: 6o 52-.Si , 0 I°.T AIIACAMENT fý me.16 Supplement-i Report Report No.: Pope: Summary No.: O1.89.11.0o2 Exwnlner HollI, Jacob Examnerw.
| |
| Day J oht C.Othu. WA w Levl: "M44 Levet M Site Review.ANII Review: UT-11-787 UT. i.6 7 of 8 DOte: -.M.LL.Date: Comments: Sketch or Photo: 5',, I I.0 I. i*ATTACHMENT A PAGE 27 OF;ý,Z kDeten O Site/Unit:
| |
| Oconee / 1 Summary No.: 01.B9.11.0029 Workscope:
| |
| ISI mination of Percent Coverage fc UT Examinations
| |
| -Pipe Procedure:
| |
| Procedure Rev.: Work Order No.: PDI-UT-2 E 01897774 Outage No.: O1-26 Report No.: UT-11-757
| |
| &Page: 8 of 8 A 45Sden Scan I Scan 2 Scan 3 Scan 4 100.000 100.000% Length X% Length X% Length X% Length X 50.000 50.000% volume of length 1100 =% volume of length /100 =% volume of length /100 =% volume of length /100 =50.000 50.000% total for Scan I% total for Scan 2% total for Scan 3% total for Scan 4 Add totals and divide by # scans = 50.000 % total for 45 deg Other deg -60 (to be used for supplemental scans)The data to be listed below is for coverage that was not obtained with the 45 deg scans.Scan 1 Scan 2 Scan 3 Scan 4 100.000 % Length X 100.000 % Length X% Length X% Length X 0.000 % volume of length / 100 =50.000 % volume of length / 100 =% volume of length/ 100 =% volume of length / 100 =0.000 % total for Scan 1 50.000 % total for Scan 2% total for Scan 3% total for Scan 4 Percent complete coverame Add totals for each scan required and divide by # of scans to determine; 37.500 % Total for complete exam Site Field Supervisor:
| |
| Z ., L.'I-, Date: 41_e / ///_CT Summary No.: w o UT Calibration..
| |
| amination i.Oconee I 01.89.11.0023
| |
| 'SI Procedure:
| |
| Procedure Rev.: Woi Order No.: NDS-8.i HlOlm Outage No.: 014n Repoi No.: Ur-I11.783 0-6.. 4 ..1 A Code: 1I09000A Catlterm:.
| |
| : 5. ,9.11 Location.DrwIrg No.: ISI-OCNI.0b9 DftWP : Nozle to Sale End system ID: 5 Component W0: 1-PI131- .SzSIeurgil; WA Thlckneaa/Diameter 9912.33138.
| |
| Linmitalins:
| |
| Ye" -See attached sheets Stat Tlmr. 1034 Fnish Tihw. 1044 Ifatswnen setwn Search Unit Seilt No.: 1IILWG Seda No.: 01-1,Time IDat M&AMufacuter ICRAIITICRMER Manuftobren R= I Inil Cal 1010 4 Modok. Uel-m 200*1"t :w wri Iner Cal...-;te-U-.dInter.
| |
| CaL.Damping: I1K Rejech. 8% Mod& 1.-WAVE --Rep. Ret,,: _ .ft h Feq:- 2 MRS Mea-aed Angle: 78 Cuplant Flter Fixed Mode: Dual Wedge 8s : Interal CaL Batch: ' 0326 vofag: Flied Odwr Fulwave Type: ULTRAGOL U Ax Gain (d): 74 Chro Gstn (dB): 74 earch Unit Cale Mfg.: SONOTECH I Seen O. a .6 IM.of Sound O Type. R -174 ExamSatoh 0932O Unoaity Report No.: Length. 6 No. Conn., Type: &lTRAGE. 11 Cad , Sokan CBoOVeg Mfg.: SoOTECH CaL. Sklck No. SMf4 upagaQ Dowmrnpammo SandB: 74, T' wes 2A.,4 Die.: Mtd. CCOW0 Scan dB: 74 SrfNo.: .MM CaL BSO. Temp. G9 Temp. Took MCNDE4M130 Exam SWIaMe: ,O.. Type: ROMPAB Comp. Temp. 67 Temp. Toot MCNDE40130 Bur. Cend tIon: As Ground Recordable lndlestien~s)
| |
| Yes Q No 0 (if Yes. Ref. Afttahe ULimnor Indication Report.)I Olerdatd searh Uni t I4T Ho 80 3.7 114 16- .-sund-a Refetder An=.de DfW~See' "da ___ I dSfstwmo Id se u vo w II II *Axplfmo ONf 40As#&PejenOf -COW Q Reoed E Percent Of Coverage, Obtained r 50D%:-tnfaQ Comments:
| |
| NW F'P A2.,=~q "F/6,.
| |
| Sfte/Unll; Sumnmary No.: Woftcope: UT Calibration..
| |
| aminatlon I'01,81.11.0029 Procedumr:
| |
| Procedure Rev.: Work Order No.: NOE.5S0.1 Outage No.: 01-26 Report No.: UT-11-783 Page: 2 of 4;018197774 Code: 199812000A CaJItei: a-J 18.11 Location: Omv.ng No.: ISI.OCNI-009 Descrption:
| |
| Nczli to Safs End System ID: 50 Component ID: 14P1B1-9 s~zlsLonoth:
| |
| NIA ThldweaWDnumtt 88&3=.5321 Urntautlons:
| |
| Ye. -See attched *hoets _Stant Te: 148 Finish Time: 1402 instrument Settings a.urch Unit I Seuial No.: OIILW6 Seoal No.: 03-738 -Manulkhc r KRAUTKRAMER , u Manuid mWer .RI"D Model: USH-CO 81w 2pi" shape: Square D .lay: 14.U ano.: 7.0 Freq.: 1.0 Style: 'RLI Mv CaINeI: .2438 Hih Exsam Anigk 60 " -ofElemments:
| |
| Dual;Oamping: 1K Reject: 0% Mode: Longs Rep. Rate: A Freq.: I MHz Meaaured Angb 0 Ffft. Fxed Mode: Dtd Wede 81: Intqlre Voltage.:
| |
| Fixed Other: Futtwave Ax. Gain (d8)l 751 Crc. GaIn (d): 63.6 Search Unit Cable I Screen Dv. a .7 In. of Sound Path TWO: RG -174 Linearity Report No.: L-11-143 Length I. -No. Conn._ , 0 Calibration BIlc Scan Coveape Cal. Block No. 5M4 UpsieamnQ Downstream R) Scan dB: 75.1 Thcnss RA64 Die.. Flat CW CCW E dB: 76.1 Cal. 8k Temp. III Temp. Toolk MCNDB401I0 Exam 8iafaýc: O.D.Camp. Temp. 67 Temp. Tool: MCNDE40130 Surface Condidt: As Ground Recordab-e Indation(a):
| |
| Yes Q No Z (it Yes, Ref. Atdesehd Ulmsonic Indication Report.)Results: Accept 9j Re@ect 0 lno 13 Col. Thu. Date Checks .-HOW~a Cal 1013 41181011.Inter. Cal, Inte. Cal. 1044 41181201 Inter. Cal. _Final Cal 11230,41/21 Couplant CaL Batch- 00325 rype: ULTMtAGEL I Mfg.: SONOTECH Exam Batch 0935 rype: ULTRAGE1.
| |
| It Mfg.: SONOTECH Reference Block nrial No.: AM=rype: ROMPAS Commenas:
| |
| NIA AXa Orientated search Unit_6,rr1n ._en -.,W, _.. .. I -i CiraufmfwntlialOrtentated Search Unit_______________________
| |
| I -I I -Cadefltio n= o S A, S&weep DIVIeion SourW.d Pet so0 3A89!,RefewWIuelhlultor Block Gain Slowa Suap BM Pt db! Reflecto AID116 b 46.8F ?lbdlu so 3 PAGE_30 QF/ý2 0 DUKE POWER COMPANY ISI LIMITATION REPOkT GomponentlWeld ID: 1-PI81-9 Item No: 01.B9.JL0029 remarks: 0 NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION Procedure allows scanning from 0 LIMITED SCAN 01 0 2 0 [1- 2 C cw 0cCw castsfdeonly.
| |
| FROM L N/A to L N/A. INCHES FROM WO -2 "to CL __ _ __ __ANGLE: 0 [1 45 060 other "6ORL FROM 0 DEGto 360. DEG O NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION Proce.duros sc0nnlng from'OLIMITED SCAN 1 2 0 1 02 0 cw 0 ccw 'cast side only.FROM L N/A to L N/A INCHES FROM WO -1.60 to CL .ANGLE: D 0 0l 45 0 60 other 70R. FROM 0 DEG to 360 DEG NO SCAN SURFACE BEAMDIRECTION 0 LIMITED SCAN 0l 1 0] 2 [0 1 2 0 cw 0 ccw FROM L N/A to L N/A INCHES FROM WO CL to Beyond ANGLE: 0 0 0 45 060 other 6ORL FROM N/A. DEG to N/A DEG 0 NO SCAN 0 LIMITED SCAN SURFACE 1102 BEAM DIRECTION z01 2 0 w EDcew UT-Iii83-" Sketch(s) attached FROM L NIA toL N/A 4 INCHES FROM WO CL to Beyond r 7ORL FROM DEG to DEG ANGLE: 0 0 0 5 0 60 0 yes 0:] No othe im L i Shet3' --of 4 01tA Date:.tAmumm A.
| |
| ..0 Supplemental Report Report No.: UT.11-763 Page: 4 of Summary No.: 0129.1.1020 Exalmlnenr koft Jacob Examiner Day, John, C.Other WA LW.!: 11-H Roewern LeveL: IM4 Site Review.Lovek NWA AN!! Review: I a I I I Ill Comments:." Sketch or Photo: "6',O a,.,.v AH1ACRMER A PAGE 3X% OF/3.
| |
| UT Calibration,. .amination summary No.: Wodcacpe: Oaooe. .1 '1 01 "91.07 Pmaodum: Pmoedure Rev.: Wo,* Ordler No.: Pol-UT-2 0180742.5 Outage No.: 0914.Repot No.: UT11-765 Page: I of 8 D.7mat'wn No.: Systsm ID: 5ýoinponsnt ID: "081D-1.knbatons:
| |
| yes -e8.S1998/2000A D.esiim: B-J Pm9.11 Deelttt RC Pump 151 to Sofa end Location: atta "d shosts SlzeiAMOlh WA staft Time: 42302 Thicknecu/Dlaietan 9/2.33/23.S Finish Time: 1312 Instrument Settlngs Boarch Unit Sertal No.: .011aT Seatml No.: O.O5LJ .. 1, -.
| |
| ... X MR .Man k .n'alCal 10 4"Ip model: USN-40 .8 0.5 Shape: Round kE Dway 7.5947 Range: 8.00 Freq.. 2 MNa style: Comp -Inter. Cal. -302 ART011 I.V0C oe l.I .1268 Pulst Hig E zauAngta:
| |
| 45 #of Elemn tsd : ! M ing C l --Rep. Rate: AutoabLah Fmq.: 2.2 MHz .Aw. A..le: As Coup.nt Filter: Roxd Mods: PE Wedge 81)4., M$WQC Cal. Botch: CBS"___Voltage: Fixed Oth. Putihve Type: ULTRAGEL II Ax. Gain (d): 58,s Clro. Galn (B)f S. Search Unit Cable Mra.: BONOTIECH I S D$a m .8 In. of Bound Path Type: RO -174 Exam Batch -SU Liamday Report No.. L-11-139 Lengt: V No. Con.: 0 Type: ULTRRAGL U Cl Brat look 1Scan Coverage MID.: 8ONOTsCH-cut. Block NO. 4o03r Upseem 0 Dowmatram
| |
| @ o SBn dB: 58_8 R nos Block ThIcknea 3.000 DID.: Fist CW E CCWZ Scan dB: 658 Social No- 044r40 Cal. SOL Temp. 67 Temp. Took M.CN 4I30 Em wos ... , Type: .ROMPAS Camp. Temp. 705j Temp. ToM MCNDE4MI30
| |
| + Uree Condio: , As Ground Recordable indicatlon(s):
| |
| Yea 0 No [ (If Yea, Ref. Attached ltrwao Indcatlton Repot.)Result: Accept Q Reject [] Intej Comments:
| |
| Inll Percent Of Coverage Obtand , eo1 : OMo .edwed Po, D .N.S e a d A x l e S A_ __n Gain 1 Saalwsew.......
| |
| : 11. P s 90 2A4 LO0 f-J e l I I I I I I I I II I i tlmm"Ine:
| |
| La IA..N Did ainan cob Other Leval WA signature Date 11.. , M, Dab W1A ______________________________.......___i
| |
| ____Ir#; * +PA6E3;3 OF/'1 4ý
| |
| ,Summary No.Wormonopo:
| |
| '0 UT Calibration. .aminatlon Oconem I O1.B9.11.0071 IS'Procadurw.
| |
| Prooedure Rev.: Work Onrer No.: POI.UT.2 B Outage No.: 01-26 ROpWt No.: UTo11*-765 Page: 2 of .8 04, 7425.. * .COdW 200A C9tAtm: 9.4 189.11 Locato: Drnwng No.: 84I-OCN-013
| |
| | |
| ==
| |
| Description:==
| |
| | |
| RC Pump 191 tiSale end System ID: s0 Compone it ID: iI-P B II-I -SIe,- inI , ?" T e "iS,.Lknlfttona:
| |
| Yes. 9e aftmlised sheets SltanTbn:
| |
| ..1320 Fk1be: ,123.A... .t -'+/-- ..I",',, -I f~nxumom m~nP Swi No.: 01IMT" KRAmUKRMER Model.: UsN"011. 02 Range: 1 0A0 Mit Cawok, .121 PWW.Dwmping: IIC Rajoc 0%Rep. aW.: !et" Fmq.- 2.0 Mhzf Ffr Fke~d Mod.: Dual Volage: ' Fixed OtW -=Fulave'Ax. Gain (dý 80.3 Cke. Gain (dB WlA wertn un it Seils No,: 10-1204 Maiufactaue.
| |
| RTD'Slam: 2 fl1L -Shape:. e.Freq.: 2.0 Mf t: mtL*Eanm Ango: 60 #of emonents:
| |
| Dval Mode: .L.ng: ..Measured Angle 6 Wedge SW40 Integral Searth UMi Cable TWO Date, IChooks InW aCol.l 10121.411720117I Inter. Cal.Inter. Cal. 13225 41171211A Inter. CaL Fnal Cal 1550 4ISO 2 CaL Batch: .06 Type: ULTRGRI A Mfg.: SONMTCH Exam Batch .A9325 Type: ULTRAG-L a Mlg.: SONOTECH Reftmnce Block Sedal No. 044740 Type: ROPAS:Axs orete eUnit'Co &,ibrati ft igafnal SweeP Son m WOM -4. I8 -4J A Td ______ .-f RdefereAosimulatew Mick I 8mme Dova 1.0 in. of 8ound Pth Two: ARG- 174 Lhrwlty Report.: -1.1:o Length: 6 No. Conn.: 0 CalirUtlon Bloack Sen Coverage Cal. Blook No,. 40397 Up*"mC] Dowm mrnli SandD: 71.3 rrdckoua 3.000 V~a.: PW CW Q CCW[Q ScandB: MIA Cal. B&lL Temp. 67 Temp. Took MCNDE401 .Exam Surfaoe: O.D...Comp. Temp. 70.6 Temp. Took MCNDO4MItO Surflbe Condlion:
| |
| As Ground dS IR~fri*; p"9kde. .Cl~alon sir r-_'-'m -so F .Recordable Indklcet ): Yeo -No 10 (If Ye, RaL Afttched Ultnm 1c; bidloation RopLol.).Results: -E3 Rejec on inf EJ Conimordez ITAII&I Section Fimm
| |
| ... ... .. .6ta/fi Qeonte Workscope:-
| |
| 0 UT Calibration. .amination
| |
| *0 I 1_01.8241.0072 IS, Procedure:
| |
| Procedure Rev.: WoA Order No.: Prn-ur4 01897425 Outage No.: .01-M8.Report No.: .UT-11.765 Pane: 3 of. k xda.209 Cet~bBm: 5-5 iso5.1 Location:)rawlng No.: 18.OH.OSOswlptlo RC Pump iBi to Safe end SyetatoinI:
| |
| 50ýOmpwwnfn 10: 14:19?0.1 SkwuI~ngth Ell Thlcinosaalameter..
| |
| SSI.32=3..Imitat!"n:
| |
| Yes See attached aiwesta SUartTime:
| |
| .1314 Fninsh Time; 1224 Inbuet 5 i~tCOL Timed Data AxiW Onleldfid 8 0 ni Until SwlaI No.; 01110" smaw fot: _____________
| |
| Checks, -atit -O vy lModek US"-S WOW:.6 Sh : , Rosind !b&Ltb- -Cal ON8 53 7.DeaIay GAIN0 Rang.: 12m80 Fr"q.: 2.25 MHz Style: CotoPI-0 InW Cl 1313 4M --WitCawI:e IZU3 Pwor. "to .Exam Ange: 70 0of Elements:
| |
| ;7.xl bftfb -c-l-Dam, 19q: IK uP^%G 4% Mode: Shear -EMlj --"0 --m Rep. PAte: Autoii~oh Fraq. 2.25 MNf Meuajud Angle: 70Couplazit-
| |
| ---Mr.eu Ftxed Mode: PIN_____ Wedge Stwa MeWO.C Cal. Satoh 003M C&CMUMfaMntICu1ratutd Beamh UrdE Voltage: Fkei O~wr. Fuliwave .YPer ULTRAOEL II amli Sga wJ AxL Qain (dS)X =J. Ckc. GafIn (dB): NL4 search Unit cawl Mk.- SONOTECH' Ral -f? Ainpbtf % Oblaln CudP I screun Lw.- I- 1.5 of Sound Pinfit Type: RO -174 5jmBih 025WA -1~ ~ .~ ~ L~ll: ~ ______Type:.
| |
| ULYRAGEOL U Colrto Boksoan Cowiag, Mfg.: -SOtfOTECIO___________
| |
| Cal. Blocic No. 40597 -Upatrem C3 Do~wnstetam iSee : Z Referenice BlockReMft Dl k Thlolawa.
| |
| LOOP Ola.: Ret Cw 0 CCWQ Scan dB: NI Seila Io: 0-70SudPu Cat. Bli Temp. 07 Ternp. Tool: MCMDUMOIS Ewrn Siafane: dB!. Ad~~Camrp. Temp. 70.0 Temp. Toot MCNOE4@130 Sudboo Condlilca As Orowud Recordable aindlcaitonfe):
| |
| Yes Q No 0 (if Yea, Red. Aboheld Mamieaol WnICatOM Report.)Results: Aacept 0] Reject 2 Into ( Conimefta Initlal Section XI Exam Percent Of Covearge Obtained 90%: ND Reviewed Pre~uiOnueDta:
| |
| No Examinor Love, 11-1 Db'D.8 a~uffr, Lester, E. 4 17 : Otier Lavel ElIA Signature Dab at EllA PARr i '2n cf./
| |
| UT Calibrat.
| |
| ._,Examination 8Iwurft Summary No.: Workccope:
| |
| .-0 Outage No.: O1-6 Report No.: UT, t.765 Page: 4 of B O 1.BU.11.0072 ivocedur.Pmcedure Rev.: Work Order No.: NDE.-640 01897425 eowe: louriooA CeLAtei: U.J iDS.11I Location: Drwiwng No., 1 lS. CNI.413 Daacdpttoe:
| |
| RC Pumrp 151 to Safe end Systemi ID: so Comnponent ID: I-PIDBI-11 SkA.J vkth NIA T~lcneaofflamoten 88/2.3/335 LUmbtaons:
| |
| None Start TIM1: .1210 Fhinis Thime: 1300 mnalumem Geaonga Search Uin Serial No.: 011MBT Se.. aW No., 6668B Manufecwuge KRAIJIKRAMER Manuftoluvrw Pamemeblcs Mod;k USM4O s: .1.0 Sha: tound Dolor. 0.557 Range: 0 1..26 MHz Style: GAMM Mil Caloel: .2250 Puber. 4lh ., Exmm Angle: 0 0 of Elements:
| |
| Single Damping: K RJeim* 0% Mode: i Long.Rep. Rate: Autohigh Fq-: 2.25 iNMsi l ead A ..... 0, Flfter. Fixed Mode: PH Wedge Wtyle: Integral volage: Fbod Other Fufweave Ax. Gain (dB)f 31.2 CGe6 Gain (dB): N/A Saroh Unit Cable$ Maren Dlv.; ..of SoIed Pah Type: RO -474 Cl. Tire* Date Checks l,,a Cal 1250 411712011Cal.Inter. Cal.Inter. Cal.Final rA 1 1300 41721 Couplut Cal. Batch: 00325 Type: ULTRAGEL A Mfg.: thONOTECH Exam Batch on"'5.MWi Orentate bgach un/t-cON6 S nat path R dr Aan. ... ..e-omonods so. 5.5 2.700 Cfrowuftnflalr Orientated Search Unit]o_ Mon vowISwe I NIA'I-.. ,nfprua.tlm,.up/atef loc Uneary Report No.: .-11-139 Langth: No.Conn.:
| |
| 0 Type: ULTRAGEL II Caelbratc block soon CoveraI Mfg.: BOROOTECH C.a. Block No. Component Upstream 0 Downstream 0 Scan M 33 Reference BMock Th~c a 2.330 CALe: _CW 10 -CW- Scan dB: 33 Seral No.: 04-6740 CaL Bk. Temp. 70.0 Temp. Tool: .MCNDI4I30 , Exam 8urBae: 01) Type: ROMPAS Camp. Temp. 70.5 Temp. Tool: MCNOIS0 , mSurfac Condition:
| |
| As Ground Recordable Indloation(a): .Yea No [ (if Yes, Ref. Attached Uiltrsonlo Indication Report)Resulas: Reect fl n_ Q. Cornmment.:
| |
| Intl Percent OfCoverageOobtainedsm
| |
| ~ 0: yes Re¶Am~d Previous Datw.___sound Pam TH, V.I.= I ". .,:VA. BWý 18 LP -S Ua a X, Exam P A A 0 u0 DUKE POWER COMPANY ISI LIMITATION REPORT Component/Weld ID: I-PDBI-1 Item No: O1B9.11.0072 remars: 0 NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM biRECTION Due to 11B RCP nozze E] LIMITED SCAN 1 0 2 03 1 02 9 cw N ccw confguration.
| |
| FROM L N/A to L NIA INCHES FROM WO CL to Beyond ___ANGLE: 0 0 0 45 0g60 other 70 FROM 0 DEG to 360 DEG 0 NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION*
| |
| D LIMITED SCAN [03 1 0 2 ["- 1 0 2 0 cw [I ccw FROM L __ ._to L INCHES FROM WO to ....ANGLE: 0-0 0 45 060 other- FROM DEG to DEG 0 NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION E- LIMITED SCAN 01 02. 1 E]QI[1 2 [1 CW E"_ cw FROM L to L INCHES FROM WO to ........ANGLE: [10 0 45 0 60 other FROM DEGto -DEG-NO SCAN ED LIMITED SCAN FROM L to'L 4.SURFACE]1 02 BEAM DIRECTION.
| |
| 0,' ] Q2 0cW ccw.Sketch(s) attached INCHES'FROM WO to _IANGLE: 000 5 0 60 other I PAGE,3 QF/1,g I I I Supplemental Report Report No.: Page: Summary No.: Examiner: Examiner: Other.O1.B9.1 1.0072 Ste ufferf Leste;! --L S i HAPsel MatheW, 8.NIA.Level: U-N Level: MIN Level: NIA Site Review;UT-1t-765 6 of 8 Date: 9.Comments:
| |
| .Sketch or Photo:-. SCAt-I Q -5ciAPJ I I i I 1**/I AI1uW¶ A PAGE3jg OF14 3 AN06 Supplemental Report Report No.: Page: Summary No.: 01.B9.11.0072 Examiner Stauffer, Lestmr L.~9 '~ ''-- evel: OW.Examiner:
| |
| H82686 Matthew a Level: N other. WA Level: MIA Reviewer -)ed'ueA ANDI Relew UT-I 1-765 7" of 8 Date: Cf. ..i Date:/'Comments: Sketch or Photo: 0'-,r Pumn'p Ii3l-'?, PC~ft-c-.oLi-PAS3~OF//1 Determination of Pi UT Examine Procedure:
| |
| 2 Procedure Rev.: Work Order No.: ercent Coverage for Mtlons- Pipe PDi-UT-2 ...-Outage No.: 01-20. ,-"i Report No.: UT-11-765 01807425 Page: 8 of 8 SiteWUnMt Ocrnee I I Summary No.: 012.9.11n007 Wofaowpe:
| |
| Ist Scan1. % Length X .%volumoeoflength' 100w % totawfornScan 1 Scan 2 % Length X " %_ %voune of lngth/ I _Go % totaforScan 2 Scan3 100.000 % Length X 50.000 % volume of length 100= 50.000. % total for Scan 3 Scan4 100.000 % LengthX 50.000 %voumeoflengthI100 50000 % total forScan 4 Add totals and dIvIde by# scansa 50.000 %total for45 dog OhdA -70 (to be used for supplemental scans)The data to be Hated below Is for coverage that was not obtained wth the 45 dog scans.0 Scan I Scan 2 Scan 3 Scan 4 100.000 0.000"%Length X 50.000 % volurie of length 1100O"%Length X 0.00 % oun ftegh10 ,%LantX % volnaof length I10Da ,%LengthX
| |
| ____% volumeof Wnglhl1100 50.000 % total forScan I 0.000 % ttal for Scan 2%totl forScan 3% tota for Scan 4 Add totals for each scan required and divide by # of scans to dtemllne;37.500 % Total for compee exam Site Fleld Supervbsr A:r Date:- 14,-A, 0 UT Calibration.
| |
| amination maw, swued Slmmaiy*, Wwtso"Op Outage No.: 01-26 Repod NO.: UT-11-774 Pace: 1 of 4 Oconee Procedure Procedure Rev.: Work Order No.: NOE-=S181200l Caelmma: B- 1911 Location:)rwkn NO.: _ISl-0CN1413 Desvription:
| |
| RC Pump 5l1'to Safe end;yteam ID: so'omponern ID: 1-P01-1 Slzizenngtl:
| |
| WiA Thiosnetlarmster.
| |
| 52.3301 Imltators:
| |
| Yes. -Beeteched
| |
| *heat S"nt Tim.: .1041 Fbfth Tine. 108w Cear. Timtej~ Date MO Oplentalted Siambt Unit.Beti N, : No. ,W- Se.al NO.: 03-789 i Cha.ke -w"___u___.,__________, _ MKR.nT ..... RTO I Initial al 1W0 1 c * "M Sa MdkUSN.S0 sure; &NSape: Reel. 4" cal 41181201 so______Delay. 18.7506 en 7.0 Freq., 4.0 MHx StWl: TIKLI War. 1 1040 ---mit Caleh .2600 PelU, High Exam Angle: 601. # of Elemenfts ua, -I-ter.7w._
| |
| Final Cald100.Dampw 1K 19 ,R,. 0% Mnds: Lang, -i O ___ __-__Rep. Rate: Autohlgh Freq- i Mitz Mujed Agle: to Coupleat _.Ffter FUd Mode: Dual Wedg. IntIMlI Cal. Batc 09"25 Cl nfaal Orlentated rqbU Voltlas: Fixed OMten Fultwav Type: ULTRAGEL 1 Sial -Sweep Gain (') 70 Uo Galn (dB) 71.6 Saiearh Unit Cable M 4 SONO:ECH __,.__ __ -.-*.ineait Report No.: L4. 14-1S , 6V No. Conn.: _ Tpe:. ULTRAGEL II -, CtibraUon Block Saen Cowrag Mfg.: SONOTECH -Cal. Block No. .02. .Up*S"iml ja 0 $can d8: 3 Reference Block. Rdeftn 1esfwl oink Thlaimesa 24ft Dl.: Flat CW 62 CCW~a soon dE: 73 i iwN. 474 %W'a Col. 11k. Temp. 67 Temp. Too. MCNOE4@130 Exam swic.e ..0. Type: ROMPAS P?. ' R EI-, I I0 S .D Iv0'i Compý. Temp. S? Temp. TooL' MCMDEA0430 Surface Condifti -- As Groumd -I Recordable Indlalet,(.):
| |
| Ya Q No 0 (If Yes, Re. Altached Ultrenno Irdicalon Repor..)Re'll: D R1 I D Commeff, Percet of Coverag Obtained:
| |
| ' 90% No Realsied fNevio"r Dami He, Examiner Level Dab~ RS~aueo vk wem wluu D"Mo. l 9 Meive. IL 4116*01 AtaM44r "atr , -~ .-A1621 I& .il 6.Z4 Other Level NIA Signature Date1 ANII -Sognerjm Daeb... ...i.o;A111"tMEOt A
| |
| L nowtswUnit:
| |
| Wowkoope: UT Calibration.
| |
| amination Oconee I I 01.J3.11.0072 Procedure:
| |
| Pmoedura Rev.: Work Order No.: N0E430 Outage No.: 0140 Report No.: UT-11-774 Page: 2 of 4 018974.25:,Awe: 99/0BOOA Cat.lta: B 9.1 -Locatl Drawkig No.: ISI-OCN1-013 Doslepitlo:
| |
| RC Puep iB1 to 8Saf end System ID: to Conponent 10: I-P DB-1 SlzsLA ngb:,. NIA Thtckes.i lametw 8S J033i Umflatl. as: Yes -.8 attached ah6 S4 Fkfth Tkme: 1058... ..- .... -" : ,, , II I I natrtument Beffings, search UniA Serial No.: COWiNHK ~ o:CFl. Time Datb___ _ __.e Choks Iktanutoture -KRAUTKRAMER
| |
| ...aneM& _____. _____In___
| |
| _ G 1012e 411821121 Mod&.: uBN4o 8zo: URN-"16) Shape: Root. Cal Delay: 10.6m Ra,.: .5.00 F'" 2.0 Mmz '1.":
| |
| 4.1 11-IMt0 Calwet .22 -Pulsor Hieh Exam Angle: 70L 2 of Elements:
| |
| Duel 5E Ca.-D.rng:. 1K R* .- o,. Mo-e: FM al -I I Rep. Rate: Auohigh Freq.: 2.0 MHz Mesurd Angle: 70' Couptant Fn Fixed Mode: Dual Wedge SW1$: Int.rfl CaL Botch:. 09325..Voltage: Fted Othw. Fuihwarve Type: ULTRAGEL It Ax. Gain (dB) 80.1 Chu Gain (dB) 80.G S atach Unit Cable Mfg.: SONOTECH I Sceen Div.= -5 hi. of Sound Type: RG -174 Exam Batch 0125 Linealty Rpopd No.: L.11413 LOngth: v No. CoMr.: __,,_0, Type: ULTRAGEL If..Calradon Block Sao Coverage WO.: sONOTECl Cal. lmoc No. 50f14 Upstram ] Downstream 0 Scan do: al et...c. , k lclumas 2404 Mie.: Flat CW 0 CCW j Scan. dB: 81 Serhd No.: 0441740 Cal. 9lk. Temp. _7 Temp. Toot: MCNDE40130 Exam 8urhci: O.D. Type: ROMPAB Comp. Temp. 67! Temp. Took: MCNDE40130 Surfla As Ground Recordable Indication(s):
| |
| Yes Q No [ (if Yes, ReL. Attached Ultrasonic IndIcaltlon Rýpol)Resuls: Accept 0 "Aed S no [3 Comments:
| |
| NIA+ * , ,, + J .Axial CrtaritatsdSearoh Unit RbtrAmpl~tude
| |
| ' I= Division IIT O to 88 1.00 Clreumfersuttul Orlutitatad SeaeI~ UnIt V .V -Y -Cwbrctwn Resebbxd Am~DI n Sound Pelth t .. -it" DMH'an I. .U-1.25-, .I If0 M 44.__ IZmml IZ, ZIZ=.o.4.AIIACHMEKT A PAGE 41~ oF 0... 0 DUKE POWER COMPANY ISI LIMITATION REPORT Component/Weld ID: 1-PDBI-1 item No: =9.oI1.:L0072:
| |
| remAri:[ NO SCAN sURFACE BEAM DIRECTION scanningdfrot QLIMITED SCAN 01 ] 2 0 1 0 2-[D cw S ccw castsdeonly.
| |
| FROM L N/A to L N/A INCHES FROM WO CL to Beyond ANGLE: 0 0 0 45 0'60' o ther. 70L FROM 0 DEG to 360 DEG 0 NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION 0] UMITEDSCAN 0 1 0 2 0 1 [1 2 0-' cw 0_ ccw FROM L to L INCHES FROM WO _ _ to -_ _ANGLE: 0 03 45 ( 60 other FROM DEG to DEG NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION rl LIMITED SCAN 0 1 0 2 nI -0 2 0 cw f c cw FROM L to L INCHES FROM WO ,to ANGLE: 0 0 0 45 0 60 other FROM DEG to DEG 0l NO SCAN 0 LIMITED SCAN*. SURF 01 ACE BEAM DIRECTION 0 2 0 1 -J 2 [' cw F ccw OT-11-774 A FROM L to L'4 INCHES FROM WO to DEG to DEG Sketch(s) attached 0 yes O No Sheet 3 of 4 I olix.Date:.1 A11AtC4E.NTA PACE Supplemental Report'.0 Report No.: Page: Summary No.: O1.B9.t1.0072 Examiner.
| |
| Hiss ,,,Matw S. .. ._44 -Examiner Stauffer, Lestr,.Offher: WMA Level: WI-N Level: Hi-N Level: NIA Reviewer.:Ste Revew:".ANIIJReOWeO.
| |
| ii UT-11-774
| |
| .4 of 4.Date: Date: Comments., Sketch or Photo:? /s2.?b2- tjr -L S~.1~slq,- ~e0 A11ACHM~iL~
| |
| PAGEq 0 Wo,, Staunt Summary No,: Workscope:
| |
| 0 UT Calibratlojr aminatlon O oconfee I , O1.C4.11.0029 iS8 Procedure:
| |
| Procedure Rev.: Work Order No,: PDI-t1T4 l-01909569 Outage No.: 01-28 Report No-* UT-.11476 pace: I of 7 Page. 1 9!Code: Drawling No.: System ID: 63A Component ID: ILP-12640 Umiltatons:
| |
| Yes -see at 19"842000A ILP-P128 CatJltem:
| |
| C-F-41/C5.11
| |
| | |
| ==
| |
| Description:==
| |
| | |
| Reducer to Valve ILP.18 (Cast))aon:o tached shoot Sfzef,1ength NIA ThickneBa/Diameter:
| |
| 1.16.1 12,000 Start Tbme: 1517 FInBh Time: 1543=Instrument SetWng.Search Unit Sertal No.: DOXI4L Seofal No.: 8E0708 Mianufacturer:
| |
| KRAUTKRA..R Manufacturer. , ,K Model: U8N4, Size: .5 Shape: Round Delay; 5.4644 Range-. 3.. Freq.: .2 IAMl- style: .-Como .0 MUI CaIeI: .1199 Pulser High Exm Angle: 45 #of E16FROMW Single Damping: 1K Reolm* 01- Mode: Shear Rep. Rate: Autohlo , Freq.: 2.25 MHz Measured Angle: 45 Couplarl FIl.er Fixed Mode: PE Wedge Sl)fe: MSWQC Cal. Batch: Dorn Voltage: Fixed Other: Fulhvave Type: ULTRAGEL If Ax. Gain (dB) 27.3 Circ. Gain (dS) 27.3 Search Unit Cable MIg.: SONOTECH I Scroen Div. a .3 in. of Sound Path Type: RG -174 Exam Batch: 09326-LUnearity Report No.: , L11-13t Length: 6 No. Conn.: .0 TYPO: ULTRAGEL iI Calibration Blockt Scan Covmge Mfg.: SONOTECH Cal. Blak No. 40413 Upstream 0 O0awbum Scan dB: 4.9 Reference Block Thickness 1.125 0SD.a. 12 CW [ CCW @ Scan dB: 49 Serial No.: , .Cal. BIk. Temp. 72 Tamp, Tool: MCNDE40I29 Exam Surface: 0.0. Type: Rompas CoMp. rmIp. 8` Temp. Tool: MCt4DE4.,29.
| |
| Surface Condition:
| |
| As Ground Recordable Indlcalon(s):
| |
| Yea 0 NO [ (It Yea, Pea. Ultrasonic Indication Report)Results: Accept Q Reject [ Info 0 Comments:
| |
| N/A Percent Of Coverage Obtained > g0%: No Revlewed Previous Data: Yoa Ch~mwam~flshIbI Oerfeetotea nrh Unit R*11e6tor Akptitude
| |
| #A Omaon IDN6"c so 6.3 1.59 Raersrca)Slm=dtr Black Gobi Il~~ Swepim on Pt 48 Refflfctor A~mpd *A Divison 25.1 11"Radlus
| |
| '80 3IA~ F I'.Examninar Level m Date Reviewer ~at r R On*oi Greg J. 21112011 Examirwnr Letve I1-M n Dat Side Review jASignature Date Da.John C. 271-12011 0____________A,_________
| |
| Other Level NIA ~ Slonsfrve" DaeANI" Date ýPAGE q Q 1 U UT Callbratior vamination Slts/Unll:
| |
| Oconee Summary No.Workscope:
| |
| / t 01I.C5.1110029 Procedure:
| |
| Procedure Rev.: Work Order No.;PDI-UT-2 S 010'09589 Outage No.: .01-26 Report No. UT-11-875 Page: 2 .of 7 tiS Code: 1U9I0=00A CatAtem: C-F.ilC.1i Locatlon: Drawing No.: ILP-128 Dasctlpion:
| |
| Reducer to Valve ILP-1S (Cast)System ID: 83A.Component ID: 1LP-128-80 Size1enght:
| |
| WfA- TckneassDlamwter.
| |
| 1.165112.000 Lmlitations:
| |
| Yes -See Attached Sheet Start Time: 1548 Finish Time: 1610 Iii *. .. .. .--.Inaftment Settlngs Search Unit Cal. Time Date Axial Orientated Search Unit S.. al l No.: 0OXI4L Seoral No.: 007Y13 Cho ciks -P .IN Manufacturer KRAUTKRAMER Manufacture KBA Iniltal C0 1503 211/2011t P1. Am d%. Dion Model: USN-80 Sife: 0.5 Shape: Round -IIntero Cal.h. ..,... .. , Sie: O. .Sap: -'ID Noib.h. 60 4.3 Delay: 10.0522 Range: 6 Freq.: 2.25 MI~z Style: Comp -a Inter. Cal. 1545 2111'201 M'Ut Ca/Vel: .12i4 Purser: High Exam Angle: 60 aof Ereman gl Inter. Cal .Damping: 1K Reject: 0%, Mode: Shear RFinl CaE 1647 21201 Rep. Rate; Aulohl Frnq.: 2.3 MHz Measured Ange: 60 Couplont -,-.-Filter: Fixed Mode: PE Wedge Style: MSWQC Cal. Batch: 09325 CIrcumMerentIal Orlentatrd Search Unit'Voltage: Fixed Other. Futhweve Type: ULTRAGEL II Cablj .fi Signal Sweep o P Ax. Gain (dB) 45.5 Cio. G ain (dB)f 4i.5 Search Unit C able M ig.: .. ONOTE CH " .% DIvIsion ..... .1 Screen Div. -.8 In. of Sound Path Type: RG -174 EWN/A__ ... ~~Exam Batch: 03S, Lewaty Report No.: L-11-1 31 Lenglh: -V No. Conn.: a Type: ULTRAGEL II CibratJon Block " Scan Covervnge Mig.: .ONOTECH Cal. okck No. -40413 Upstream 0 Downvebam 0 Scan dB: 53.8 Reference Block lbflt ul.or Bloack Thlcknes 1.125 DIe.: 12 CW.] CCW Q d: NIA Serwal No.: .m da" *5wj-- ' Pah Cal. _Lk. Temp. 72 Temp. Tool: MCNDE4012B.. -ExamSu ac.,O.D. Type: RompaM 2,L1 1?.Raltus 80 2 i Comp. Temp. _81 Temp. Took: MCNDE4012O Surfaeo Condition:.
| |
| As Ground.Recordable Indication(s):
| |
| Yea Q No & (if Yea, Reo. Attached Ultrsonic Indication Report.)Results: Accept [J Reject 9 Info Q Comment.:
| |
| Uoed ID notch due to 5 to I rWto.Percent Of Coverage Obtaned 90%: No Reviewed Previous Oata: Yee.Elx~inbwr Level g4N Anature Date Revikrv intr Ransom, Greg J. 2".P20t.ExamIner Level II-N o"eats ie Row Signature
| |
| .Day, John, C. 211/2011 A Other Level N/A SignN ove Dl NIA PASE q6 16-Workscope:
| |
| UT Calibration~
| |
| xaftation Oconee I*01I.c6.1111ozg Procedure:
| |
| Procedure Rev.: Work Order No.: PDIJUT-2 Outage No.: 01-28 Report No.: UT-11-S7T Page: 3 Of, T7 818 Code: 119M/000A CaLl./am:
| |
| C-F-ItC5.1t.1 Location: Drawing No.: ILP-120
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| | |
| Roducer to Valve lLP-18 (Cast)System 10: .3A.Component ID: ILP-128-80 .lz Lenglho llA, Thiclkees/Diameter
| |
| .1.1681 12.000 LmItatolanr:
| |
| Yes -See Attached Shoots Start To.e: 1013 Fish Time: 6316 Insttument Settings Search Unit cal. Time Date Axial Orientated Search Unit Serial No.: oOX 14L Serial No.: 93 C hek s I Ca l o -' Op- SSo und Pat Manufcturer..
| |
| KRAUTKRAMER Manufacturer ,RID rrdllJ Cal 1504 V112011 Reflector Amplitude
| |
| % Division Model: USN-60 Stre: 2 (10xi8) Shape: Rectangle ,Inter.L Cl. -314 SdH 8 6.5 2A73 Delay:, 9.6303 Range: ." Freq-.. 2.0 Ml Stylae: TRL2 n Cal. 1812 21112011...~ ~~Inter. C al.'- '" M 'i C a t i e ld : .23 0 2 P u l v er : H i g h E m A n g le : 00 0 o f E m le r e t s: ; 1 1 F ina l .C, a l.-... FFinal Col 1648- 2/112011" Damping; IK Reject. 0% Made: Lon.. -_4 2 Rep. Rate: Auohigh Frq.: 2 MHz Measured Angle: 6' -Cp. co______Filter. Fixed Mode: oail Wedge Style: Integral Cal. eatch: 09325 C.Ircuuftrsnital Orlentated Search Unit Voltage: Fixed Othe. Fulfwave Type: ULTRAGEL II Catibatlon Signal Sweep Sound Path Ax. Gain (dB) 76.5 Circ. Gain (dB) 76.5 Searoh Unit Cable Mfg.: SONOTECH RefIoI .r Am plide. % Division .I scren Div.= .5 In. of Sound Path Type: RG -.74 Exam Bc: ' .A 4....Unesrtly Report No.: L-SI-131 .Length: 11 No. Conn.: 0 Type:, ULTRAGELU
| |
| ...-Calibration B1lack scan Coverage Mfg.:
| |
| -..-Cal. Block No, 40413 Upstream 0 Downreiam R) Scan d8: 76.5 Referenen Block Refoenowellmulator Block Th,,,,es 1.125 De..: 12 ow 0 CCWO Scan dB: WiA an fignal SwepO Sound Path CaL BIk. Temp. 7.2 Temp. Tool; MCNDE40i29 Exam Surface: OeJ). Tr Romp.:, 53.1.. V Radefue -d0 2 st" Comp. Temp. 81_ Temp, Tool: MCNDE4012e Surface Condw : As Ground Recordable .ndleaton(a):
| |
| yes Q No (if Yes, Rot. Attached Ultrasonic Indication Repor.)Results: Accept [J Reject 0 Info Q Comments:
| |
| Used ID not.h due to S to I ratio.Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%. N.o. Re.iwd Previous Date: Y., Examiner Level lI-N Signature Date R"w .S.gnatureate Ransom, Greg,' J. .--Examiner Level U-N' Dýt ..s.. Review Signature Date D'-6 John. C. 2*112011 4A Other Lavel NIA- 0ate ANqP Aw , c jk F s reDate NIA 6!h(K( ~ /~V I.#AIIAýHMEHI A PAGE OF DUKE POWER COMPANY ISI LIMITATION REPORT Component/Weld ID: ILP-128-80 Item No: O1.C5.11.0029 remarks: NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION Due to valve configuration i LIMITED SCAN [j 1 0 2 0 1 [1 2 El cW Z CCW (Cast material)FROM L N/A to L N/A INCHES FROM WO CL to Beyond 1-LP-18 Valve ANGLE: El 0 0 45 9 60 other FROM 0 DEG to 360 DEG El NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION-]LIMITED SCAN El- 1 2 l1 [ 2 i- cw ]ccw FROM L to L INCHES FROM WO to ANGLE: E] 0 Ei 45 El 60 other FROM DEG to DEG-' NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION-iLIMITED SCANý EL 1 [3 2 -] 1 E] 2 [] cw n ccw FROM L to L INCHES FROM WO to ANGLE: E] 0 [] 45 Ci 60 other FROM DEG to DEG Li NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION Li LIMITED SCAN El 1 El 2 Li1 -IL 2 Li cw i ccw UT-11-675 FROM L to. L INCHES FROM WO to Sketch(s) attached ANGLE: L] 0 L] 45 Li 60 other FROM DEG to DEG DE yes i No Prepared By: Gregor Ransom ., gje I: 11 Date: 02/01/11 Sheet 4 of 7 Reviewed By: ý72 Dale:sp~o~
| |
| VL v a; 0 Sport Supplemer Report No.: UT-s .-75 Page: 5 of 7)Summary No.: O1.CS.11.0029 Examiner Ransom. Greg J. A ExamIner:
| |
| Dn Jahii C. (Other: WA A, Level: 1144 Level: I1-M Level: N/A Raviewer Site Review: ANII Review,-A I U Date: Date: Date:Ii 2 Comments:
| |
| I LP-12-8.0 Scale I to I Sketch or Photo: CtS-t Valve-. (51.)IL?-O31?i~?E (:5 ).... i 1*.,lAITACHMENT PAGE qj fF 4 w fflupSupplemernt..
| |
| Report Report No.: UT-11-675 Page: 6 of 7 Summary No.: Ot.C5.11.0029 Examiner:
| |
| Ransom, Greg. J Examiner:
| |
| Day, John. C.Other: MIA.Level: Il-N Level. U-N Level: WA Reviewer: Site Review: ANII Review: Ih7JA A Date: Dale: Comments:
| |
| ILP-128-80 Sketch or Photo: f/so cxJ1-elpf'-st 1 I I+'I+AtTACKK~ER A PAGE OF~ /gZ3 0 MIhMMM Determination of P I UT Examinl ercent Coverage for ations -Pipe PDI-UT-2 Outage No.- 01-28 6 a E Report No.: UT-11475 01909569 Page: 7 of 7 11 Site/Unit Oconee I Summary No.: O1.C5.11.0029 Worksoope:
| |
| 11 Procedure:
| |
| Procedure Rev.: Work Order No.: Scan 1 Scan 2 Scan 3 Scan 4% Length X% Length X 100.000 % Length X 50.000 100.000 % Length X 50.000% volume of 100 d% volume of length 1100 =% volume of length 1100 =% volume of length 1100_____ _..%totalforScan I% total for Scan 2 50.000 % total for Scan 3 60.000 % total for Scan 4 Add totals and divide by # scans.P 50.000 % total for 45 dog Other dog -60 (to be used for supplemental scans)The data to be Usted below Is for coverage that was not obtained with the 45 dog scans.t., Scan 1 Scan 2 Scan 3 Scan 4 100.000 % Length X 50.000 % volume of length 1100a 50,000 %total for Scan I 100.000 % Length X 0.000 % Volume of length 1100= 0,000 % total for Scan 2% Length X % volume of length 1100 _ _ % total for Scan 3_ _ _ % Length X % volue of Wngth100=
| |
| I. ... % total for Scan 4-Percent~cormv~ste goyerage Add totals for each scan required and divide by # of scars to deterrnne; 37.500 % Total for complete exam Site Field Supervisor S~teFiel Suprvist 1a TjZR I-Zott 0 Swnmmay No.-Woarscope:
| |
| UT Doon.. J Procedure:
| |
| Pmeedure Rev.: Work Ontf No--view"r.Outage No-* 01-26 Report No.: Lrrf.1.60 Page: 1 of a Code: IIIa/IOOOA
| |
| :,
| |
| C..P.1fC8.11 L.nuauou___________________
| |
| ODaWng No.: IP0400 Descdptlon:
| |
| Flow Resi1oor to Pipe System ID: 33A Component ID: ILP-201-17 WSe : WA Thiclesamefet 88/1.0110.0 UmItatlona:
| |
| Ya -See aotached aheata Sta Time: 1232 Fb*h Thie: 1401 Insrumen Settings Search Unit Cal Tl* Oa Aidt Otr.ntad 8b Un*, ,f.: POX14L. so,,ia " ".Pj2 al Ca.ahrw. BWi -wee -Manufacturer.
| |
| KRAUTKCRAMUR Manufacturer:
| |
| KSA -Wv -95 414__ -d~ n~tbS Dao owPt Delay. 495 Raa: -"req.: 2 --" MlX awe. Ca Ina, C0L 1230 4M612011 -Ml! CaIVaI: .111 Putter~ High Exmi Ardis: 46 Dof Elements:
| |
| Il~ngli Inter. -i q Damping: 1K Reject 0,. Mode: shut lo]4--1-Rap. Ratw Aual Frsq. 2.201Mft Mezawuredlge; 48 Couplant ____ ___Filter. Fixied Made: PE Wedge SW MSWQC Cal. Batch own Orleintatsd Samh Unit Voltage: Fblxd Other FtdIvm Type: ULTRA. UL U Caftreow ! gt " Swe e Path Ax. Gain (dB)ý MIA CW& Gain (ft) 27.7 Search Unit Cable Mg: SONOTOECH Re~eoio Anipfltd.
| |
| 1A. DMain Isorean 01Y. h 2 i.ot Sound Path -Type: RO -.174 illt No1 tch so.... ...iL. I!L ,ineafty Repor No.: L41.137 Langthv., N@, on. .Cn- --0 Type, ULTRAE.L Ii Sclibrain Bo an Covereg. Mt., SON.OECH --i -CaL lOC co PNOUT.Q Upstram 0 Downstream Q Scan dB: WA Reference Sl.r9 Thickness
| |
| .00.2.2 .Fla dw@ CCW1 8ndB: 34.8 Gab "1" P C aL BIk. Temp. 72 Temp. Toot. MCNDE40I30 Exam Surfaoe: ..O.. "y.: 04P74 2*7 IV. 8 4 .comp. Temp. 7. Temp. Tool:
| |
| Swti CondWon: As Ground Recordable lndloatlon(s):
| |
| Ye Q No ( (if Fl.a Attached , Indjcan Re,.)Reocm.: Acoept Q Raject. ino 3 Commenta.
| |
| WA PeFrent of Fo= ..o,-.: .... 00:_ No ...ed'P.ul..
| |
| Yei E,,ie LOW .._, .Mul. ,W. Keldh. ..' ..: .r,) ... 4/.1612011
| |
| ~ / " ,/ i , " iMathw.U ,WA-.a 8ftm/unl Summary N.Woriccacpe.
| |
| UT Calibration,-
| |
| amlnation Oconee I I 01.CS.1l.0014 is;Procedure:
| |
| Ppxedwr Rev--Work Order No0.: P~l-Ul.-.018077$4 Outage No.: Report No.: UT-I 1.780 Pas: 2 of a Code: 19twm200 Catiltem:
| |
| C-F-1/C.II 1'ravhig Ho.: ILP-209 De"Drdptlitlo Flow Re.Uitctor to Pipe System ;O: OMA ComponentlD ILP4-W-7 8b*Aeigt: ,IA Twmassolumeter S810.0fl Lkmflatiom-Yes -See attached shoets._______
| |
| Startmfme:
| |
| .123* Flnluh Tbne: 1401.t...ment sett i ng Search unit_______Cal TIims DtebII4~fh BMWial No.: 0OXt4L Ser'al No.: IFlJ0 Checks -Ibr_ m .. ..'.4 Sweepat.menufadtUner KRAUTKRANElt Ausoturenr-KIA lml 0 Cal 0013 41161201 ___________
| |
| ____________
| |
| ____ Melon Model: UaN-O ________gap&.
| |
| Inter. COL __ -ImNth 8 *DIIIy? Round Weg Fe.2.5M..S)
| |
| Cal. 1311 ---1 4.._ C am p -. , 2 O_ _ _ 4I J1 Inter. _ _ _M. CaW*l: .,A1u Pu. n Ih .Em, Anlo!. 6o #of Elements:
| |
| S ingl, D,..S- _.- l_ __ _.t'__, -Damping: 1K Reject 0% MoeShear 16AAi~.____
| |
| Rp. t* p A u~tft Fmeq-1 2.25 MHz -Measurd Angle:. Il6 _______ -Feat, Fbtd mode: PS Wefts 8I4,.: mSWQC
| |
| .00=1 o+4dOala Search Unit Vollege: FbK.d OtWr Fuilwave TYWo: ULTRAQEL 9 cam"Gasion.
| |
| :Sigh'l Steep Ax. Gain (d0) 41.9 Chu. Gain ( 'dB) NIA Search U'ft Cable Mig.: SONOTECH R"I"e+." A pibade , 04- P *I PlSou at Scree Dly. = J3 In. of Sound Pafh Type:~ RO. .174 Exa Bac 0=8g -WA ___Linearity Repod No... Lo-11.137 Laegth: -1 No. CoWL.: 9_ Type: ULTWAGL II .-*-Calibration Block so ovrg MWg. SONOTECH _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Cal. Bluk No. __ Upelr Qo wnstram D e Scan, oB" 51.1 ThIckness
| |
| .50.2. De.: Flat OWO CCWQ Scan B: MIA Qf lw.......- Sal No.: 0...141 Soud P CaL+.V Tw.,'p.--73 Tam', To'* MCMDE401.
| |
| .., n S,,., w.+, o.D. f, +bi,, % .,f" rl Comp. 76 Temp. Tool: MCNDBE4OIZO Surface ondWon: As dround -Recordable fIdlcetion(s:
| |
| Yes Q No 0 (tf Yes. Rat. Attached utrasonc Indleulion Report.) 1.Results AcceptQ e &aJe Int 0o Comments:
| |
| NIA Peret, O f CoverggoObained
| |
| : 3. go%: No Reviewed Previos Datl: Yea Uwnb"Aw Level 114i Signaturs aee Basal. Matthew. S. ml Othe Letvl WdA 13;. IT 10h*1'sDa WlA i i i I l i l _ _ i Ii ii iiii i I .A h 4 l A I PAGE,ý I UT Calibratlor 1.-.AaIMlnatlon Surnmary No.: Wottcacpe.:
| |
| Ocoeen I Procedure Procdure Rev.: Work Order No.: PVI4IT4 -.a@1907784 Outage No.: 0125i Report No-, U~T-1-780 Pap; 3 of .6 Drawbn No.: 11.11209 o~sscdption:
| |
| Flow RelrMator to Pipe Systam ID: 63A Componient I0: 1LP400-1W7 stwu~nglh IVA: Thomlne~fas tar~ 6811.C010*
| |
| Limitations:
| |
| Yes -Sea attached aheata Start TIMe: 42123* PFrileTlmnw 1401 Ins.buwht Sat .4 tsearch Uncat. I Seial No.: 1OXl4L Seral No.: ,3-s , Checks -i ode Mauwue RUKAE Y Jinida Cal 1000 d'lM81011 Modek USN.8O Sie: g(1@a lh Shape: Ral. _ Inter. Cal. -Dley. G.456 Range: 3 Freq. to MHz a" 't* 7KL2 lft*CL1141121 MU CIveI: .11 PuLsa. Hig Apgl: 0 o Elements:
| |
| Due] -Darnptng I K Reject 0% Modez Lon~g. LLU 164 111120 Rep. Rawe Lath. 2 MHZ Measured Anale: ________Cul Fl~tor. Pied Mode: Dual. Wedge St.a: gteg!md CaL Baitch: .- 2 , Vetting: Moxd Ofliet Fuliweve .Type: ULLTRAGEL II.Ax. Gean (di): 66.1 Clo. Gain (dO):. H/A seach Unit Cable Mfg.: SONiOTECH I Sceen DIv. = .3 In. of Sound Pai Type: RG -174. Exam BatSh 09)25 Lineadly Report No.: L-11 1a? Length 6' fot COan- 0 Type:. ULTRAGEI USloek Scan Coverae Mf SONOTECH CaL Block No. PDM-IT. Upstream 0 Downstream 0 am do: 72.5 Thcnu .L0 Diu.: 0101___ CWQ( CCWQ0Sam dg:VA_________
| |
| lat -Serfia -N.: 044741 Cal. 81k. Temp. 73M Temp. Took. MCN0E40130 Exam , O.D. Tywe ROMPAS Comp. Temp. 71 Temp. Too: MCNDR40130.
| |
| Surfne Oondllow As Ground Recordable Indliatlon(s):
| |
| Yes Q No R (If Yesa Reo. Afsa11ed Ultrasonlo Irndonal Report.)Resulle: Accept Q Rejec 0 Info Q Comments:
| |
| NiA Percent of Coverage Obtained 2- 00%: No -Reiewud Preious Deba: y Ob Ation l Oretae Soweep U rd r Ifftsb so 7.1 .2m3: C==.fWeuhuAW ffhja0le~Wd Stiirh Unit Cabrfalsm slw 'l-Re Artr ofAm lsld 5 do D tundfceh WA _____ReftitareeJlft ijtst Stock-L80fb I` s lmh I III I I I I 1 .443 In h"S".004 4 PASE <bjaf~z DUKE POWER COMPANY ISI LIMITATION REPORT ComponentlWeld ID: ILP-209-17
| |
| ?tm No-, 0145AL0084 remarks: 0 NO $CAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION Due to valve conflguraton
| |
| *0 LIMITED SCAN 011 02 0 1 02 (3 ew 0 =w cu tra F wRsMIvm FROM L NIA to L N/A INCHES FROM WO CL to Beyond._....___,_,-, ANGLE: 0 0 0 45 other FROM 0 DEGto 360 DEG C NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION]LIMITED SCAN 01 0 2 0 1 0 2O0 cw ___ tow FROM L to L INCHES FROM WO .... _. to*ANGLF- [00 o Q45 ]60 other FROM DEG to DEG O NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION
| |
| .....-LIMITED SCAN 01 0 [12 0 1 2 cw0 cow ca FROM L to L_____ INCHES FROM WO to o ...__ANGLE: [ 0 0 45 [3 60 other FROM DEG to DEG u?0 NO SCAN 0 LIMITED SCAN SURFACE 010 2 BEAM DIRECTION 03 02 O cwEow~u'r-i 1-700 Sketch(s) attached FROM L toL INCHES FROM WO to -4 ANGLE: 000 _6 60 V ATIACHMENT A PASE S T F) .
| |
| 0 0 Supplemental Report Report No.: Page: Summary No,: O1.CS.11.0084 Examiw: Bugl, W. Kelth eval U.Examlner .1a aIltrnw S Level: O0W. NA Level., VA Reviewer.
| |
| .ANII Review.UT-11.780 6 of 6 Date: .Comments: Sketch or Photo.(ALOYRNJrkao.
| |
| 'S.i.t.9-" *i.9j. i1 .VACOAtME~FASE.5's OF, IDetermination of Percent Coverage fo IeM .UT Examinations
| |
| -Pipe OLRZ:: 6 Of6* SItoUnfit OconeelI I Summrnay No.: 01.C5.11.0094 Worikscope:
| |
| t51 Procedure:
| |
| Procedure Rev.: Work Order No.: PDWT-2 E 4`189T/64 Scan I % LengthX, % volume of leripgt 100 = % total for Scan 1 Scan 2 % Length X % vokune of length 100 _ % total for Scan 2 Scan 3 100.000 % Length X 50.000 % volume of length! 100 D 50.000 % total for Scan 3 Scan 4 100.000 % LengthX 50.000 %volume of length 1100 50.000 % tot1 for Scan 4 Add totals and divide by S scans = 50.000 % total for 45 deg other-den
| |
| -60 (to be used for supplemental scans)The data to be listed below is for coverage that was not obtained with the 45 deg scans.Scant Scan 2 Scan 3 Scan 4 100.000 % Length X 50.000 % volume of length 1100 = .50.000 % total for Scan I 100.000 % Lengh X 0.000 % volume of lejh 1l100 = 0.000 %totalforScan2
| |
| % Length X % volume oftength 1100 = % total for Scan 3% Length X % volume oflength 1100 = % total for Scan 4 Poent coniolete, coverage Add totals for each scan required and dMde by # of scans to determine; 37.500 % Total for complete exam SAtD Field Supwviscr
| |
| __________________
| |
| Date:
| |
| E.--A n, '!k ; ..* 3. .& I1h.dU M .: .% .' ..;' ..:. s .iZ*. 17 77-," -.-k -.-~ I -~,Y __u bum ~Ho.. :OOIX~U..
| |
| -Cii WON .. .L__itT .La I~bad ~ ________IT.
| |
| : 4. A404 ZS ~ ~ .4 -. f -~ -I pa~.-~5--~ -c- -I -I I .. .w..* --I.C,.*.... ...... ..... .. .. .. ... .-&11 ~ 6 -Haso 11I3 i.... ..1 _ _ L i ...j~Cii~ .. .- ~rn4r4.o'~L
| |
| -' a~G am~~ da w" T___ ca~a.___~7'~~ ~.Te~'T~b~'UCID~O38.
| |
| ~jj'* _______PAS_
| |
| t!AL____ ___ ___ ~ IJ~Iaw con~R;.7"a Yh Taa~. ta- MCOE IS & Aada'~POMM 5 '~Ua~ a r:YM.PtnOc~9u~~%~.
| |
| H.~ -.-., ~ ...>~ '~..~ ~.-'A.3.4 -.. , * -. I.~~3 9 M/62-
| |
| ...SýI* .-.-*;SOL U I W, .u-&-v A 10 91-FS-s~t~u~..........ox14L.
| |
| ...........
| |
| ~~a~in .~ ____ -q* Lin,_______________...up'
| |
| ..Vql~~~~p~WW S jfthuv~:&
| |
| ~ -N W CPf _-'gg-S WezýU A 7,~~A2 -P.___ ___ __y~q~. *W ~ f~SQ I4a~ ! .-i.hi., WAvau *O~4Y C~L Bh~ -. .. -I-, p.- 2.~ -9.~f2.-.*j 4 DO#IN. ~t______ t__ V..1b~PaI ..:O .2JL ~. ----~ p ~p aa ~ ..It~gamI Aw.Fa~ r.Uyp mo7j-~i ..' ...p- __W.71 srKs 4t 41.. ., W7_/A Z
| |
| *im*M5y I'" 41i~ * '4P.L9-u , ---, ..- .~~5.*~ bd ~ -, --* .A .a- ~ -.--- ~ .~.j. -~ M E .* .~- IS~ h ~~AM*3__ _ _ __ _ _ _ 5 O154k~ ~~!a ..1K .6,)~L ..~.~,~ex. y.-- .. ---, .* -.-_ _ __Fl~d ..Ott 7.i-ttal--~ ..~fr4ii5~*4~JII B5p oa~~ (9~ .~J Ck I~t $1A 6~u~aIJ~~I~
| |
| -~~ ONO W4d-V~-LJOWIy R~p)4aJL4143
| |
| :r., -.-.L% t T .~ i~..-*..~~ ... U b a 1 D 0qd~f. . .A ýfn~lria t nF;ara~. tsp vw "..Gram" $ OaT f.Y aacu Cvomraa~*Toak~ .bCNV~40t3A
| |
| ~ ._i443 w~j 3 *101~~!Q#AZ rNmproa -7N4IO ~ M~ud ~ ' T.~.~ ~ ,. ~7* 4W. :
| |
| * A%£4WSI5.W ~gn~~~7z~-*,-o-!7vi wiu~~i~.th
| |
| -- ~. .' .~',.Nu 9WL=VoI 0 0 PANY _": I --..---1G1~tbN *.. ~ -' I Z~. *t~ DM~bnd ~~__________
| |
| I3~ _______~ -~I~hoN 2 U cv~ tJ to'* ~ 4...~..Lv......
| |
| -..,r-r-..~ .~* I .I..~ ~* ~,*, *.. .~-~. ,*.oar r Dflt~:.--~AI1ACHMEKT A PA6E * ~
| |
| 9.I 0'S~nZ4z;aLPti~
| |
| i Ai 1; KI-101i;r 4?e24~2~Zf
| |
| /~'2~
| |
| 4 I>so'V.¶ .i ft1/47~S. 2!..rbU~ :j'~" q SummaryNo.:
| |
| Worscopa UT Calibratior OInation Oconee I O1405.21,0004 Procedre: Procedure Rev.: Wor" Order No.: PDI.4T-2-utg No.: 01-VI Report No.: UT-11-874 Page: I of a Co.o: 1998/2000A CanlJltm:
| |
| 1f-1/C5.21 Lowaion;Drawing No.: 1HP-192 Deacdplqn:
| |
| Pipe to Flange Orifice System ID: 61A Component iD: 1HP-192-t5 SleAength:
| |
| W/A, ThiCCknOss/DaIunter 0.63114.0188 LlmllalJor:
| |
| :Yes -e8e attched shoot 121 Finish l1me: 1233 Settingsoeo.a U-i- --.--- ---Inusnnt *Wng Swb Uit Cl. IM ateAxial Odritod Search Unit Seral No.: .00X14L Scial No.: 8B0253 Choks .. Cai on Signal Manutachoor KRAUTKRAMER ManuR cl-_..z 1 09 VeA01f Apn % Seone S___ath Relco Amltd Diixo Modal: USN-OG 45w Shape: Round Iner Cal 10otach so 4-___ M64 Delwy: 4.1701 Range: 1.00 Freq.: 2.20 MHz style; Comp O-G Cai. 1214 2/l-2011 -MV CaJvel:- .1220 Pubser~ ______ in !Ahe j,4ý Io~eols Intler _____I Damping: 1K ExJeca: Agd4 # 0heer ii J430 %2o1=1 'Rep. Rate: Awtahigh Freq.: 2.26 MHz Measured Angle: 45 Couplant FIJI: FiXed Mode: Re Wege SOW.: mBWQC Cal. Ba"ch: 00325 Clr"cumreaoal Oilentated Searcb Unit Vollage: Fkied Owhe. Fullwarve Type: ULTRAGSL II Callbratol l Sig Sweep Pl A. Gain (dB) 33.0 Ci ai (rB): 44.6 $iarth Urnt Cable Mt.: SONOTEC1H Reflector Amioltude lb DiMaon_ sce_ Div. a .15 UL of sond PQ* Type: RG -174 Exam Batch:; 09M --Unearity Report No.: .L-1-131 Laireh: V .No. CZo-. , 0, Type: ULTRAEL U -.-Calibration Block Bean Coverage Mfg., SONOTECH -.-.CaL BIock No. 4040 a@l Downstream
| |
| [] San dB: 49.9 Refreeonk lleaISl Black T'hcknesa
| |
| .531 Ula- 4 OW 0 ,Sanob: 4,. a. o-- A09= GaS I Signal weep Path Camp.G Ter.a6Tmp.
| |
| Tool: 14CM024412a Surface Condition:
| |
| As Ground Cal. 81k. Temp. 72.. Te~mp. Toad: M0ND840128 Exam Surface: .. ..Type: Romps. 21.5 diu 59 "5 R&cordable lndIaUonQPs):
| |
| Yes Q No 0 (if Yea, Rot. Attached Ultrasonic Indication, Papout)Reautts: Accept ) ReJect 2 info -Comment- IWA Percont Of Coverago Obtained > 90%: No RPAvved PreIots DimI Y" Examiner LI in n=--'bs D,4 Revie oe rCA-tog. .u Ransom. Greg J.. V2=U2011 ExAminer Level Ont. Si Reew .Da.te
| |
| * Day, John, C. 2M11PP Other Level NIA DabW ANI Date/kAPTACHENq yA I OALZ Sita/Urdt:
| |
| Summary No.: Wodscope: UT Calibratior'
| |
| 'iination Oconee "I 01.C5.211.0006 Procedure:
| |
| Procedure Rev.: Work Order No.:.- PD1-UT-2 Outage No.: 01-26 Report No.: UT-11474 Page: 2. of 9 01909573 ISI oo:192000A
| |
| ... cateltm: -C-F-11C5.21 Locaton Dra~ng o.:IHP-192
| |
| | |
| ==
| |
| Description:==
| |
| | |
| Pipe to Flange gOr~ce system ID: I. ..iComponen IM. IHP-192-15S SizelLength:
| |
| WA Thlcknesalolameter:
| |
| 0.63114.0IS8 Lmitations:.
| |
| as -Soe Attached Sheets Stairt Time: 1308 Finsh Time. 1344 Instrument Settings Search Unit Ae- -SeralNo: 0X11. Seia N.:cal. Time~ Date Axial Orientated Search Unit hCaibration Signal Sweep Sound Path Manufacturer:
| |
| KRAUTKRAMER Manufacturer:
| |
| GS Mal Cal 0933 2M1I2011 Reflector Ampikide % Division Moel .SI6 Inter.cCat Model: ., USH- .Sze: .26 Shape: Round ntr.Notch Tip 80 4 ,.85 Delay. 7A500 Rae:: V _ Freq.: 226 MHz Stye: 2 -p .6 Inter. Cal. 1304 2" , h_.. 'M'U CavelN ..1229 Puiser.. High --Exam Angie: 60 #of Elements:
| |
| Single Inter. Cal. -437___1/201
| |
| --Damping: 11K Rqect: 0% od:her- FalCl1437.
| |
| 2111201111 1___Rep. Rate: Autohigh Freq.: 2.25.MHz Measured Angle: 60 Couilant iJ-.Filter ..Fixed Mode: PE Wedge Style:, MWQC Cal. Batch: 09325 Circumferential Orientated Search Unit Voltage; Fixed Ote: Fullwave..
| |
| Type: ULTRAGEL II Caitxuiorn Signal Sweep Ax. Gain (di) "8A4 Ckc. Gain (dB): MNA Search Unit Cable Mfg.: SONOTECH Redied" Amplikude
| |
| % Division 1 Scemen Dlv. = .2 in. of Sound Path Type: RG -174 .aNBA* ~Exam Batch: 09325 ..ULneauty Report No.: L-11-131 Length: 61 No. Conr.: 0 Type: ULTkARAEL U Calibralon Bloc-k 8Oe Coverage Mfg.:. SONOTECH Cal. Block No. 40408 Upstram [a Downstream-n fJ Scan dB: 58A Reference Block Refrene/Slnutator Block Thilcknoss
| |
| .631 Dla.: 4 CW 0 CCW Q ftan d.: WA Sera No.: A0WA326 GB I Signal Ivý-P S. Path-al Seria Tamp.032 dB Relco AmpUlude Yo. Division C_.01.Tep 2 Temp. Tool: MCMDE40129 Exam Surboo O2.D .Type: Rompa. ".3 1 80 5aii so Comp. Temp. 70 Temp. Tool: MCHDE40129 Swuface Condition:
| |
| As Oround Recordable Indicat on(a): Yes [a No [ (If Yes. Re. Attached Ultrasonic Indication Report.)Results: Accept Q Reject 0 Info 0 Comments MIA Percent Of Coverage Obtalned > 90%: No Reviewed Previous Date: Yea Examiner Level Il-N Signature Date Reviewer Ransom, Greg J. 2/1V2011 Examiner Level U-.N Sinture Dat SkiteRivieW Sn Date Day, John. C. 21/2011....Leval WA S.atur. Data I .. ._ w ..... ..'*1 PAGE(,
| |
| UT Calibratiom.-atnati on PI ~Summary No.: oo.Workaoope:
| |
| I Il Ol.C621t.0000 Procedure:
| |
| Procedure Rev.: Work Order No.: PC[IUT-2, Outage No.: 01-26 Report No.: UT-11-674 Pap: :3 of 9 m 0190i9573 181 I Code: .8$2000A Cat.Jtor:
| |
| C..'.IJCO.21 Locatio: Drawing No.: .HP-192 DescriptIon:
| |
| Pipe to Fbinng O-rifice System 10: G1A Component ID: 18P-192-15 Sizetengft NIA ThacknosDiamter:
| |
| 0.6j3114.0188 Limitations: " Yom -S50 Aitachod Sheets start Time: 1236: Finish Time: 1302 Instrumnt onISeaus seach Unit Soda! No.: DOX14L Sedal No.: 1042"8 .Manufacturer.'
| |
| CRAUTKRAMER -Manufacturer RTO Modei USN-00 Sbwe !E71011144.
| |
| Shape: Reot.Delay. 0.4031 RDng: 3 Fre.: 2.0 MHx Warle TPL 2 MIU Cael~e: .2302 Pulve "Hi11 Exam Angle: 70 # of Bomnita: Dula Dwnpbng: ix Reject~ 0%. Mde og itop. Rate: Autohlgh FMQ.: a wha Meoasured Angi: To FWrFbixd Mode: Dual Wedge 51$.: Inteoral Voltag: Fixed COW.o Fuflwnvo AjL Gain (d8): 50.6 CIro Gain (8): NIA searo UnIt Cable 4 3. Sou... lnd Path Q-.,-A Cho Iimero'inter, Intf..Fnal Cal. B gype: al. Tim.I Dale oak ka .ICal 10141 2MIMI1.CaL CaL ___ICal 1435 I 21112o11 Gouplant letch: 09328 ULTRAGEL If SONOTECH-- AxI*I Orientated Baarei Unlt ca to Sis SweepIBound Pathi Reflecto Ampttuda % Divison 31450 80 s 3.9 1.174 cdkbmsoa siowa sweep W Pah Reflatdr' A04ilitude
| |
| % Division Rafnceffilmul~r lock dR Aeflotor Amalie % ODvilonI -~r Screen Div.~ a .01. UI __________
| |
| Ir.-. -Exam Batch 90326 Unarity Repot No.: L-11-131 Lengdv " No. Conn.: 0 Type: ULTRAGEL , Cafbrator Black scan Coverage MfgJ. SONOTSCH .Cal. Block No. 40406 Upstream D ownstream Q Scan dB: 59.8 t.n blck TnWidaw .631 Din. 4! CW- CCWC] ScandB: WA sarial No.: AG2 al. IL Tamp. 72 Tool: MCNDE40I29 Exam SurfAme: O.D Type: ROm~Sa.Comp. Temp. 70 Temp. Tool: MCNDE40129-Surace Condrl on: As Ground Reor.dable Indication(s):
| |
| Yes Q No 2; (11 Yes, Reo. Attached Ultrasaoda Indication Repb.L)Results: Accept Q Reject 2 Inf0 Q Commenta:
| |
| NSA Percent Of Coverage Obtained , 90%: *9 Revieoied PMWAvl Dowm Ye,--46.6 II RadluL so 3A 1.'AT 1ACIIMEH A PAGEýýOF/
| |
| DUKE POWER COMPANY ISI LIMITATION REPORT Component/Weld ID: IHP-192-15 ,Item No: OI.C5.21.0006 remarks:[ NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION Pipe to.flange orice OL;MITEDSCAN 0 -1 2 01 2 cw 3 ccw C0rfiguratIon.
| |
| FROM L N/A to.L , N/A. INCHES FROM WO CL ,to Beyond -ANGLE: [ 0 0 45 1060 other FROM 0' DEG to ý360 DEG. __[O NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION"LIMITED SCAN i 1 E] 2 0 1 -2 0 c ccw E_ _ _ _ _FROM L _ to L. INCHES FROM WO _ to __ANGLE: 0j 0 0 45 0] 60 other FROM DEG to D__ EG.'0] NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION ULIMITED SCAN 0 1 E] 2 ] 1 El 2 EIl cw E3 ccw _FROM L to L INCHES FROM WO to ANGLE: 0 0 0 45 C] 60 other FROM DEG to DEG I- NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION-ILIMITED SCAN l 02 ] 1 EI 2 l cw -ccw UT-10-674 FROM L to L INCHES FROM WO to .... Sketch(s) attached ANGLE: 0 0 45 0 60 other FROM __DEG to DEG 0 yes 0] No Prepared By: Gregory Ransom L: .Date: 02101/11 Sheet 4 of 9.." Reviewed By: DI &_u-I -I ATIACOMENI PAE7 OF /62-aL.AweI Supplemk-'aaport Report No.: __Page: 6 of 9 SUMMaiy NO.: O1.C5.217Jw4 Examiiner "ansm. Ora Examiner:
| |
| Day Jhn, C.Other NJA V, Ill I I I I LeveJ: IM-N Level: 11-4.Level: WA Reviewer.Site Review: ANII Review: balk A U Date: Date: Comments: (Scale I to 1) Weld 1HP-192-15 Sketch or Photo: SUA.AcE 2-I FLAA/6--E ,l/0 StLA4/;ATTACtkth, A PAGE69 rlg 9 sh.2 I!_ _,rqMFAP_SuppJeme.-A Rport Report No.: UT;-'4 Page: 6 of 0 Summary No.: O1.C5.21.0006 Examiner:
| |
| RPsnom, G1eg J.Examiner:
| |
| Day, John, C.Other WA Level: Wi-N Level: Level:, NIA-Reviewer: Site Review'.ANII Review:-Date.Date.oat , Comments: Sketch or Photo: B[F s i)/VO ELC"AN AIIACHMENT A PA61 6 c 1 OFI&I2, SupploniL.., ..aseport Repod No.: _U 4-11 Page: 7 of 9 Summary No.: O1,C5.21.0o06 Examiner Ransom, Grog J.Examner.:
| |
| Day, Jn, C.Other:, NA ....Level: l.-N Level: 014 Level: WA Reviewer Site Review; 1 ) ' ~ '/ANDI Review"..u Date: Date: DOWe Comments:
| |
| Weld I MP-192-15 indication
| |
| #1 was determined to be a geometric reflector due to I.D. weld root "his was determined using higher angles and plotifg.T-Iý ZýIJt ii &.r=-sl.)Setch ar Photo: 61f 0-SR I.. Adddm~ -8~ -~Rom ~*1 A1IACHMEKt A
| |
| Gut-Determination of Percent Coverage fo UT Examinations
| |
| -Pipe rOutage No.: 01-28 Report No.: UT-111-874
| |
| 'Page: a of 9 Site/Unit Oconee I 1 Summa,y No*: 01.1.0.2110006 Workscope:
| |
| ISI Procedure:
| |
| Procedure Rev.: Work Order No.: PDI-UT-2 E 01909573 Scan I Scan 2 Scan 3 Scan 4% Length X % volume oflength I00 I DO % total for Scan 1% Length X % volume oflenlgth I0 I ... % total for Scan 2 100.000 % Length X 50.000 % volume of length / 100 -50.000 % total for Scan 3 100.000 %Length X 50.000 % volume of length /100 = 50.000 % total for Scan 4 Add totals and divide by 9 scans: 50.000 % toted for 45 dog 0 Other deo -60 (to be used for supplemental scans)The data to be listed below Is for coverage that was not obtained with the 45 deg scans.Scan 1 100.000 % Length X 0.000 % volume of length/ 100 =Scan 2 100.000 % Length X 50.000 % volume of length 1100 =Scan 3 % Length X % volume of length 1100 =Scan4_ % Length X % volume of length 1100 =Percent complete coverage Add totals-for each scan required and divide by# of scans to determine; 37.500 % Total for coinplete exam 0.000 % total for Scan 1 50.000 % total for Scan 2% total for Scan 3% total for Scan 4 Site Field Supervisor:
| |
| Date: 0)L* ._... ... .............. ,S ..... ., ..-
| |
| ;;* _
| |
| Ultrasonic Imlaication Report" ~Sita/UnIL:
| |
| Summary No.: Workscope:
| |
| -I.1 O1-C5.21.0006 Procedure:
| |
| PQI-UT-2 Procedure Rev.- _, Work Order No.: 01909573 Outage.No.:
| |
| 01-26 .Report No.: UT-I 1-674 Page: 9 of 9*,Il W2 Examinor' Level IINSignatureDaeRvwrSinte
| |
| ' Ransom, Greg J. 2/112011 Examiner Level rDNd Sie Review Signature Date Day, John, C. W11201 SAeRve Other LeVel N/A hIM. ..ANIRfvew e-A11A*MEm A.te PAGEo OF I..I..,.* 1'.1 I:, F UT Callbratiork.--,xamination lww-Sgt$iUi~Oat.
| |
| Summary No.: Worksocopo.:
| |
| /01 .CS,2l .0024'SI Procediue:
| |
| PVI-UT-2 Procedure Rev.: 5.Order No.: 01i0,579 -Outage No.: 01-25No.: UT-11476 Pag: 0 of S Code; 19 .......i C-F-k... 21 Location: Drawing tNo.: ..S1A-01(3)
| |
| Desordllon:
| |
| Pipe to Vave t1HP.12.8 System 1I: SlA Component ID: '1.61 A-0141A -SizalLength.
| |
| WA Thickcasss/tsmeieýs 0.631,14Ai 88 LUmIwtaons:
| |
| Yes -See attached sheot Slart Time: 101 Finish Tinme: 1021 Instrument B,,ahs Gearc Unit --Cal. lTime iDab1 AiIJ D.,entaod Searchl-i, U ____Sefla No-, 00X14L. Serial No.: B80203 Chocks :- ....Initial________
| |
| Chuck. oja ... .Ctlbiation Signa SM"eep at Manufacturer KRAUTKRAfMER Mauatumn.
| |
| KRA'- __ Reflector Ampiltade
| |
| % Daivsoo Model: USN.60 Sime: .25 Shape: Round t H1atch so SA .57-Delay. 4.0688 Rango: 2 Fr. .2 ,s ,MHz Style: Camp -Inter.c Ca, 100 "21812011 M'T CaWal: .A224 Pulaor ~ Himh Earn Angle: 4. a of Elements:
| |
| Sigal~-Damnping:
| |
| 1K Reject: 0% Mode:10 2111_ _Rep. Rate: Autaobigh Freq:. 2.25 MHZ M easured Anglel. 46, Couplant _- __ ._Fater. Flixed Mode: Pa. Wedge Sty*:, MSWQC Cal. Batch: 00325 CkcnnfMndal aientated Seach Unit Voltage: Fixad Other Puliwave Type: ULTRAGL u ýCatb"e*o Signal Swee" Ax. Gain (4B): 34.5 CIr. Gain (d0 , 4V.7 Search Unit Cable Mig.: SONOTECH.
| |
| RloleOd Ampladle % Division ound Path i Scren Div. -.2 In. of !" Sound Path Type: R. 174 Exam Batch: o,232 W Notch j 50 4.3 54 LInkaar.y Repotrt No.: L-11-13 .Length: *.... No. Corin. m 0 Type: ULTRAaEL I-Calibration Block Scan Coverage Mfg.: SONOTECH ._. -Cal. Bloc. No. 40408 Upstream .,Downem @ Scn d8: 40.6 : l t blackRmn oulaier Block Thickness
| |
| .531 Ia,; 4. CW E CCW Scan dB: 51.7__.. No.: G7-i00 n Signal 8w ,ow__.Pali
| |
| -_________
| |
| dB. Refleclor Ampltud Souid Paon Cal. Rik. Temp. 7_2 Temp. Tool:k MCNDe40 .Exwf Suwrtw OO.) Type: ROMriaP 27.1 9 8ulsl 50 D isi 1o Comp. Temp. T8 Temp. Tool: MCND.4O120 Surtoe Condition:
| |
| As Ground , -I .- 5 Recordable Indcation(s):
| |
| Yes C] No 0j (If Ysu Ref. Attached Ultraaonl Indiceatin Report)Results: Accept 0 Reject RjInfo 0 Comments; NIA Peroeni Of Covenae Obtained 00%: No, Reviewed Previous Data: ...arer Lee 1. M SRO e Signature Oiner DaeO A,1ACHMENI
| |
| ..PAS OE9 93 I L ,~ ;I I, V., S I I..& 0 UT Callbrationk;zamination Summry o.o: Outage No.: 01-25 Report No- UT-11t-70 Page: '2 of a Oconree Pocadure: Procedure Rev.: Work Order No,:.PDW-T-2 01909679 Code: 1198J2000A CalItem: C-F-11C6.21 L Drawing No.: V-51A41 (3) Pe iJwo: Pipe to ýaljv I.NP-12'System ID. 61A Component ID: -1A-01491A Jz : /A Thlcknesasemetor, 0.53114.01SS LimltaUons:
| |
| Yes -S. a Ataschad Sheets Start Tire: 1093 FtlishTine:
| |
| 1043&ument setting" oar-b Unit-. ..SCali Time Date AxIal.d Orientated Search Unit Serial No.: 0OX14L Set'de No.: Sa043 .Cheak a .w nd ava Swee Son Path manul'aoturer KRAiJTKRAMER Mio- iiCal 0805 11 Refletor A~npllUsde
| |
| % Divison Model:. U6N-.0 Size: .26 S hape: Round Intr, Cal. 3/4 SDH 8* 337 .735 Deaoy: .. 54262 Range: .2 Freq.: 2.28 MHz Style: Camp- 0 iafr, Cal. 1022 2-9A0 2_t_MIIj CailVel: .1229 Pillow High Exa Anle 4 #of monto, Sl~inaiSInter.
| |
| __ -Da)mpbn: 1K Rect 0% Made. Show -Cal] 1205 205 1201o1 -Rep. Rate: Autchlgh Foq.: 2.26 MHz Measured Angle: 60 Couplmnt_
| |
| __ -Filter fixed Mode; PE Wedge Style: MSWQC Cal. Batch: 00326 Orlentalad Bearch Unit Voltage: Fixed Other. Fuliwave Type: ULTRAGRELIi
| |
| -Cealbrallon Signal Swep Sound Ax. Gain (dil): 47.9 Cbm Gain (dB): /IA Search Unit Cable M1g6: GONOTECH Roantor Divislon Screen Div. -.2 n. of Bound Path Type: RG -174, Exam Batc: 08321 WiNA Lineity, Report No.: L-11-131 Lurwa 6!4 NO, Conn., v -Type. ULTRAGEL.Calrton Black Scan Coverage Mfg.; ,, ONOTECH Cal, Block No. 404.Ob .. Upseam Fa Downstranm
| |
| @ Soan dB: 47. Refelrenco ai1oo, Reforancelimnulate Black Thlckunae
| |
| .5O1 Ole.: 4ý OW CCWQ San dB: HIA soda No.: 27.4590 Gai , Rgnl Son Path_______ __________
| |
| -0111 ________ Refllctor Ampfdo % Divslon Cat. alk. Temp. 72 Temp. Tool: MCNOE40129 Exam Swee rODye: "9Radlua 80 C 01).Camp. Temp. 78 Temp. Tool. MCNDE44129 Stufec Conidilflc As Ground Racordable lndlcationts):
| |
| Yes 0 No &a (If Yes. Ref. Allacited Ulirosonlc Indication Raxwi.)PRosuat AceptQ Ra~ct 2 lob 0 Comments:
| |
| W/A Percent Of Covereae Obtained >90%: .No Reiewed Piviud Dew.. .Yoeýdk LvlON bw Sigature Date Ra,.n .."om are ...O ..c.Z ftr L*evel NA Signate. .- Data MIA" " " A ; .. , / ., .,,, V.Al TACHMENT1A PAGE 7jD/ 4_
| |
| b j a., v V a *VI.if.II 4 fi~.1'r 0 0 DUKE -POWER COMPANY "I..ISI LINITATION REPORT i ComponentlWetd ID: 1-51A-O1-91A Item No: O1.CS.21.o24.
| |
| remarks: ED NO SCAN SURFACE. BEAM DIRECTION
| |
| .Dus4t-cponent f'] LIMITED SCAN 01 1. 02 E0 1 Ej 2 N cw J@ ccw canfratim FROM L N/A to. L N/A INCHES FROM WO CL to .Beyond_ANGLE: 0 0 23 45 1- 60 other FROM 0 DEG to 360 DEG-O NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION Q LIMITED SCAN E01 0 2 2 l 1 02[Dcw D ccw _-.__.___FROM L to L INCHES FROM WO .._:to ANGLE: 00 0-) 45 0 60 other. FROM DEG to DEG O NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION O LIMITED SCAN 1i I E0 2 I' 1 []2 [: cw El ccw FROM L to L iNCHES FROM WO _ to.0 ......ANGLE: E) 0 0 45 E0 60 other FROM DEG to DEG 0l NO SCAN I-I LIMITED SCAN SURFACE 01:: 1 012 0~BEAM DIRECTION 1 1] 2 1 cw [I ccw UT-11-676 FROM L .__L__. , INCHES FROM WO 4 ANGLE: 0] 0 [D5 0 80 other -FROI Sketch(s) attached 0D yes 1. DEG'to DEG.03 No AIIACHMENT-4 7;-0 SuDDlemenftal Rooort S. -II *Summary No.: O1.C5.21.00:
| |
| Examiner.
| |
| Day, John, C Examiner.
| |
| Ra!m.ja. G OLher WA Reviewer.$Its Revimw ,Lrak ANII Review, AM;C I bf&i, 4 of Date: Cat.: /J l a,' J.Level: U-N Level: NIA Comments:
| |
| Scale 1 to 1: Component ID SlA-0141A Sketch or Photo: 6 r5.1 5~!.0 v 0/1 ,~ fNP138 ATTACHMENTA.
| |
| P45~70 UF/
| |
| 0 Supplemental Report Report No.: Page: 5 Of 6 Date: Date: Summary No.: Dt.C5.21.002 Examiner:
| |
| Day, John, C.Examiner Rane~m, Ore Oiher. NIA If -A -&-ý',J.Level: II-N Level: I1-N Level: N/A Reviewe Site Review: ANHI Review:!*1 Comments:
| |
| Scale i to 1: Component ID -I-81A-01,91A Sketch or Photo: 6* S1 s:~CT-u~:. SA~A vaifi'e 1 #p -I as Al TACHMENT A PAGE 7 OF Dotsi Site/Urht:
| |
| Oconee I I SUgurray No.: O1.CS.21.0024 Wwoeacope.1S ninatlon of Percent Coverage fo UT Examinations
| |
| -Pipe r tJ-, Outage No.: 01-26 Rpoit No-: UT-11-678 page: A of 6 Procedure-Procedure Rev.: Wok Order No.: P01-UT72 E10?Scani% ____ Lenigth X % valurneof length / 100 _ ___%totitwfr ScanlI Scan 2 __ __% Longlh X % volume of length I100 ~ _ ___% totlfor Sca2 Scan 3 190.000 % LenigthX 50"00 % volume of ength /100- 50.000 % totalfor Scan 3 Scan 4 100.000 % LengthX 50000 % volume of lengib )100 a 50.000 % btalfor SM 4 Add totals and dMde by #somar A~000 % total for 43 dog Other~~ 60 -s (to be used for supplainantall Sans)The dab to be listed below Is for coverage that was not obtablnd wita the 45 deg sowns.1: Scan i 100.00 % LesgthX 100O.000 %volume of WO i1C00= 100.000 % total for Scan I Scan2 100.000 % LengtX ioo~ooo % volume of lengo I1I0o -100.000 % total forSoon 2 Scan 3 _____% Leonhx % vdinieoflengtiII0O=
| |
| Yo____ totedfor Scan 3 Scan 4 % Lengft X % Volumeof langth /100~ ____ total korScan 4 Add totals for each scan require and divide by # of scans to daetet M.000 % Total for complete exam Sab f d Super~fow Ouw /__;__&/I ... It.
| |
| UT Calibratior Lination Sit*/UnIL:
| |
| Oconee" 'I Outage No.: 01-26 Report No.:.. UT11.707 .Page: 1 of 6 I Summary No.: Workscope:
| |
| O1.CS.21.0041
| |
| 'SI Procedure:
| |
| Procedure Rev.: Work Older No.: PDIUT-2 04093 114=..000A Cat.m: CF .21 Location:...
| |
| ..Srawn'g No.: IHP-324
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| | |
| Tee to Vilve IHP-119 Ss; 'R 10.; 51A"* I ..i , .. .... .' "L' * , i
| |
| * g WE.A.,,nKCponent ID: 1P-324-1185 s.. ..ngth: W.A ThIclmsaelDlameter 8810.37512.5 1fi Jktitlons: See attached seets Stat Time: -134 Firdsh Tim: 1405, Instrument Settias* Search Unit -~S~taI No.: o~wHDK Call Time Dat a&OU~dwhUi Si6. .o.: oowHoK Serial No.: oo03vw Checks, I'Dola: 3.7/$?056 Rang.o: 1. 40", Fmq. 6MHZ- Style: comnp".Gi "Iter CaL 14_/3 l!l." .i. I -I0I01 apn: 1 Rec% e:inital Cal 1625 3=1111 Range:t: 11.6K F.: Is Mea401 A 4,.20111 AhFUter:., Fixed Mode: pM Wedge Styye: M:WQC Cal Batut,. 03nee ge. ____ _ ____.122_
| |
| __ _High Exam A : ,4 #f .Fixed Cthel ul25 .-... T4 tDamicialn(B:
| |
| : 26. CRejct Gai Mode, 47 erhUit ablR ~ OOEI 4,ý.ýcller Fixed .Mnode 0.1dPah Wyedg M0¶4 Cal Batch: -3 circumerentia " ao d Serc Unit p..L-11-130
| |
| '
| |
| * Length: Fx' .d O.Coe.: -__,0 _ .Type: ULTRAGELIU jý,,-l (0) 3--.h-Gin(~, -.--A Serc Uni Cal g, S N TE HA.,LUnearty Report No.: L-1__ 14_3___Type:
| |
| __ULTMEL___, Calbraio Bl~kscan Coverage Mfg.: SOROTECII-BlockNo.40378 Upstream ~Downstream Scan dB: O R ioceI Block'ileck"a 0-7 Ol- ..6C2 CW S dB:, 47A Gaown SWap SudPt All s 0.176 ole.: A"' CW COw s -Serial No.: 044737 S Path 3 Cal.91k. Temp. 74 Temp. Toot: MCNDM4128 Exam Surface. .0 " Type: ROMPAS ..- .0 *o -*0..,..+ ,, ... ... ..o .Type: .ROMl PAI 0 I IS ibCým'ipTemnp.
| |
| 84 Temp. Tool: MCNO4i28 Surface Condition:
| |
| AMGround.--"R'" toIndication(s):
| |
| Yea s No (If Yes, Rot. Attached Ultrasonic Indication Report.), Reeuits: Aop 0 ReJet 21 "i Infot, Comments,:
| |
| PRF= 2550 Hz r'PcOmni Ot Coveraga Obtalnod 0 80%: N.. Reviewed Previous Data: !Yea Examiner Levl u.N ..~.Signature
| |
| ~Review S~ei ~2 ~ Dt p Eimlo-r Level , I-N "' igrmti Date Re " Signature Data , .. 313012011 1"a-.ro ,..,,,°,l
| |
| .,. -n. .N )..Level .Signature Date I iaiul i V. -.' --ý1'. -... Ft I Ufl iii, rI 5.51 I~A~E7~ CFf-6~.
| |
| 4ummai)' No..Woricacope:
| |
| UT Calibration Ani ation J1 Ocnone I1 O11.CS.21.0"ll Procedure; Procedure Rev.: Work Order No.:-PDI-UT4Z 01901930 Outage No.: 0146 Report No.: UT-111-707 Page: 2 of'1I1 199C20JZDA Cat.tosm:
| |
| C-F-1/Gi.2t1 Locaton: C" : -aw i" No.: *IHP-324 Oeatscptlon:
| |
| tm. to V9lve tIP.-110 I ",,System ID: G1A! .-Compionent ID: 1HP-324-18nB 6-Siko/Length:
| |
| * iZA Th =."Ohowdero 881o.202.5 k m_0a : .1 Tahe.: .12 Fkndh Time: 1405 Instrument Settings 8earch UnitTime Dar ,xial OltntafdSouch Unt* ' .Serisl ,o.: GOWHOK Seilal No.: 0IJPCD Cheooks -e ..... , ..... "l1 -.uSNi.4O .... Size: ..6 Shape: Round Inter. Cl. -1) N .,h " 04 A"K'Delay..'mn 4.895 , Range: " 1.5 ... 1000 313012011 " M0 ,,. 4 O'ilon Frq. 4a9 MD tye C.- Inter. Cal. 1409 313012011 C ei .re250 P5MW. Higlh Inter. -Cal.___ __Cae: -.1260 Pidser. Hligh Exam Angle: 60 #of Elements:
| |
| Singier C-L-6.ompIng:
| |
| 1K Reject 0% Mod: he Final Cal 122.p, Rate:
| |
| Feq. 6 MHs Measured Angle. e0 Couplant; r"e Fixed Mode: PE Wedge Style: MSWQC Cal. Batch: .00326 Cko l qlM Orbnbted Searc. UnIt Voltage:.
| |
| Fixed Otr Fuliwava Typo: ULTRAGEL 11 ,'-,x. (dB): 41.6 C .M Gain (dB): NIA Search Unit Cable Mfg.: SONOTECH .... Am..I....%
| |
| DivisionS dP 4" semen olv. -.15 in. of Sound Path. Type R.. -174 .. Exam Botch
| |
| * 093.. NIA. ___J~1#!Salty Report No,: L-11-136 Length. W- No. Conn-- ye: UTAILi.nScan Coverage Myg.: SO NOT BCHL -C allbratfon Block _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _"Cal. Slock No. 40378 Upstram 2DOoa 0 Scan d9: 4 Refurenoe Slock *04I8kDodltoc 13Wek C sl..Bllk.-Temp.
| |
| 74 Tomp. TooL : MC NDE4. 28)I2 Exam Surface: O.D. S er : R .M .. " a 59 o .Pa.;mp. .em.Temp. *m.Tol"rNE4o,2I..
| |
| Surface Condition:
| |
| As Ground -ý* ttal Indlo~atin(s):
| |
| yes Q Nq~o*' (If Yes, Ref. Attached Ultrasonic Indication Report.)-~osii,, Accept Road TA Info Comments:
| |
| PRF 2532 Hz',j peCnt Of Coverago Obtalned > 90%,: No Reviewed Previous Data: YVa.Examiner Level Sl-N sIgnature D0t6 Revfew't Foss,,qtovan33021 S'Txnie Level DasilLPW ae TQoftr; Stephen D. wrh-4.004lhr:, Level MIA do Ignamiwr, Dt, IR 4~ Z4.
| |
| * 4 F Site/Unlit:
| |
| Summary No.: Workscope:
| |
| Oconee I I O1.C5.21.0041 UT Calibratioe.amina Procedure:
| |
| Procedure Rev.: Work Order No.: PDI-UT.2 0 Outage No 01-26 Report No.: LFT-11.707 Page: 3 of 6 E 01909630 1Si Code: 1998/2000A CatLtem: C-F-11C6.21 Location: Drawing No- IHP-324 Descrlption Toe to Valve IHP-119 Syatein ID: 51A Component ID: IHP-324-118B Siz/Length:
| |
| NIA Thlcknese/Dtameter 8S10.375&2.6 Limitaions:
| |
| !Yen -See attached Shoots Start Time: 1428 Finish Time: 1440* I i l I II
| |
| * I. ii. ll m i I ; i l l.I JI1. I Instrument Settings Search Unit Serial No.: 00WHOK Serial No.: 580253 ,.. Manufacturer KRAUTKRAMER Manufacturer KBA-Modek ......... iUSN40. --S1ze: .25 Shape: Round.y ,Oelay 6.449 -Range: -.2 .- Freq.: 21MHz Style: Comp-M MU Cal/Vet: 1226 Putser High Exam Angie: ..70 -of Elements:
| |
| Single.Damping: 1K Reject: 0% Mode: Shear Rep. Rate: Autohlgh Freq.: 2.25 MHz Measured Angle: 68 Filter: Fixed Mode: PE Wedge Style: MSWQC Voltage: Fixed Other: Fuliwave Ax. Gain (dB): 57.9 Circ. Gain (dB): N/A Search Unit Cable I Screen Div. = .2 in. of Sound Path Type: RG -174 Linearity Report No.: L-11-136 Length: ir No. Conn.: 0 Cal. Time Data Checks J intUal Cal 1150 3/3012011 Inter. Cal,___ ____Inter. Cal. 1427 3°3012011 Inter. Cal. i 'Final Cal 1619 13M0/2011 Couplant Cal. Batch: 09325 Type: ULTRAGEL ii Mfg.: SONOTECH Exam Batch 09325 Type: ULTRAGEL I]Mfg.: SONOTECH Reference Block Axial Orientated Search Unit Calibration Signal Sweep Sound Path Reflector Amplitude
| |
| % OMDion i1 Notch so S.9 .771 Circumferential Orientated Search Unit Calibration Signali Sweep SonL Pt Refleecor Amplitude
| |
| % Division d Path N/A Reference/Simulator Block Gain .... Signal S e Sound d8 I fnactor Amplitude Diviion.52.71 SOI 80o 3.7 .72 F __t!Calibration Block 40378 Cal. Block No.Thickness Scan Coverage Upstream R Downsteam a Scan dB: 57.9 CW[ CCW Q Scan dB: NIA 0.375 DID.: 2.5 Serial No.: 04-0737 Cal. B1k. Temp. 74 remp. Tool: MCNDE4012 " Exam Surface: OJ). Type: ROMPAS Camp. Temp. 84 Temp. Tool: MCNDE-4012 Surface Condition:
| |
| As Ground Recordable Indication(s):
| |
| Yes j] No 2 (If Yes, Ref. Attached Ultrasonic Indication Report.)Results: Accept C] Reject 1] Info 0 Comments:
| |
| PRJ Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%: No Reviewed Previous Data: Yea F= 1080 Hz Eaie Lee -NSgaueDate Revieweril Signature Data Fos. Steve W3i2 1 ' 2III IIiJlI:I DExaminer Lavel IlLt"er- De Site Re Signature Datae Tucker, SDtephen .X39/2011 MatJ othe Lee NI 00" Sinaur DaeI 0 igaueDt 14J.LIT'4~DUKE: POWER COMPANY ISI LIMITATION ,REPORT I :' ... ...,! ., ,- ,' ,Component/Weld ID: 1HP-324-118B Item No: 01 .C5.21.0041 remlrks: NO SCAN SURFACE*'
| |
| BEAM DIRECTION Limited due to welded S. 4IMITED SCAN 0 00 2 0 1 2 -cw I] cew attachments.
| |
| FROM L 1.75" to L 2.716 INCHES FROM WO CL to Beyond*A NGLE: r-0 0 [ 45 0; 6 other 70 FROM N/A DEG to N/A DEG* NO SCAN -SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION Umitbd due to.welded LIMITED SCAN I C1 02 0 1 Z 2 [ cw C cw attachments.
| |
| :FROM L 6.25 toL -7.25,. INCHES FROM WO cr_ to Beyond ANGLE 0 0045 0 60 61the.,: 70: FROM "N/A DEG to N/A -DEG NO SCAN
| |
| * SURFACE -,BEAM DIRECTION No scan due to valve..LIMITEDSCAN 1.i-- Q02 01 D 21ED w 0 ccw onfiguratio.
| |
| iFROM L N/A toL 'WNA -INCHES FROM WO CL to Beyond.,h ' 4,," I' i -4 t -.. ,. .. .
| |
| 000 45 [00 other"
| |
| * FROM 0 DEG to 360 DEG 1,:': .,, *.. .7 ... ., .. ... " " , : -".. .0 NO.SCAN SURFACE BE.AM DIRECTION' LIMITED SCAN 0] 10.1 "] 2 0 cw [C cow UT-11-70!;FROM L to L "" ." INCHES FROMWO to .Ket, ns) attached " jA, GLE" C1 0 0] 45 C] 60 'other- FROM DEG to )DEG :Y E. No PM.re d'1ed Steve Fos Lev.el.. Date".F..dv.IBy:
| |
| I .. 1 x zo <7 Date.,..,A."__M* 4 26,/t I _,jfd #ýT -,I,0,; 7ý-'C4 I *)~ Cs.'* * .7 7 14 q4 4) p% t*rAE / " g Val" 1: Sc gle: V=P I Tbee TO Vvsk 0% cvera clamedfrom surhce 1 fr()1 " aresdue~to welded fahut.!I SC 7M075/ 9.MZ75 x I1OD" 77.W/..Sufie2-..1OMcwavV o 22.85%ofk&o 5092%C1S'ofwwg f 5001o C(vadW clahmed fir CWU andiCCW Sunirng wit~h4I scanLs 3 and 4.nfuedWS=m SMn I- 77AWD%*S=4350%= 66.69%S~ 2~ 8 S 2 S r 1ne S ..--7 Determination of Percent Coverage for UT Examinations -Vessels '-SitmtUnIt Oconee I I Procedure:
| |
| PDI-UT-2 Outage No.: 01-28 Summary No.: OC01.C5.21.0041 Procedure Rev.: E Report No.: UT-1l-T07 Worscope:
| |
| 15l Work Order No.: 0196309 .Page: 6 of 6 0 deM PhMar Sca. % LengthX X ,_ % voklme of length i 100 m % total for 0 deg Scan1 77.850 % LengthX 100.000 % volume oflength 100 = 77.850 % otal forScan I Scan 2 U8.925 % Length X 100.000 % volume oflength I 10= 88.925 % total for Scan 2 Scan3 100.000 % Length X 50.000 % volume of length 1100 = 50.000 % total for Scan 3 Scan 4 100.000 % Length X 50.000 % volume of length 100 = 50.000 % tota for Scan 4 Add totals and dMde by# scans 66.694 % total for 45 deg<(Ohe d V4,-* .:* .. Scanl 2 %LengtX % %volumeoflength/100
| |
| ... 1-100%totalforScanl 2 Scan23 __ _ % Length X %vlmeofiMnjdj1G00=
| |
| .%ttlorc ,Scan2
| |
| % volume oflen th I I= ..%totalforScan4 2.-s~a Ls.. :- vom) -.-*tor
| |
| * 0.sc1., -%LengttX ." .%,hif~gel..
| |
| 1 jjg00 -.,, .'%afttroscan4" Add totals and divide by# scans % total for .*. ,. ..Pement comalete coverage Add totals for each angle and scan required and divide by # of angles to determine; 66.694 % Total for conplete exam Note: Supplemental coverage may be achieved by use of other angles J methods. When used, the .ierage for volume not examinatlon.-~
| |
| ............
| |
| : .... .... ..-..-:+ .,. ; ..". .,; -., -, :,. " ;. .J%' .-.Z ,, , -..... ..... ., ._ + : -.,
| |
| ~ Summary No.:~ -K Workscope:
| |
| UT Calibration
| |
| 'atation Oconee 1 .1 O1.C5.21.0053 Procedure:
| |
| Procedure Roy.:-Work Oider No.: PDI-JT.2 010380 Outage No.: 01426 Report No.: UT-11-795 Pogw 1 of 7 I 11 II liB/ It I IlL. m :.1998M2oooA 9 No.:. 1~yat~rn ID: .@1k.~ ~ ~.*~Component ID: 141A.0244B
| |
| *LimftaUouia:
| |
| ' Valve configuration
| |
| -61A-02 "" Ce tm: " C-F-IIC5.21
| |
| _________
| |
| V~acpfon:
| |
| Ellbow to* Valve 1IHP.134 Lontlon: SfweLength:
| |
| MIA TnicknasJfaerneW 352.33114.0 Gtrt Tlwo 1350 Finish Thnw. 1403." , ,m , .. ." " .... .; .. _ .-. .... ., .I I instnamant set-ings Search U* ht Col. Date P.aI~: ktS Ieia No. .. 'I -Checks 014LC(4..08.L KRAUTKRAMER Manufactrer:
| |
| Initial Cal .103 411t72011 U S'-. ..W. Size:, 0.25 Shap; Round Inter. Cal. 411712 Delay. ...701 Range: 1.80 Freq... -.;2.26 MHw SC M: inter. C Al. -13941711 SM.d Co ,: .12=. P*i e.. Swuar. ExamAdgfe:
| |
| 4j; .o ouElements:e
| |
| .,l --Final Cal 1635 41l7120fl 4 ,a p 500 Reject* 0%. Mod*: ___- __ _ .--Atep .Autohlqh Freq: 2.25 MHz -. Meaewed Anglo: .. .._ 44__.... .. Coup4.nt;;Fgted.. .Fixd. Mode: Pi Wedge Sft:e: MSWQC Cal. Batchl 0&322
| |
| * 450 Other: Fullwavo " .. *. .". ". Type: ULTRAGEL II r.: G i,(a 31.0 Cire. Gain (dB) 3.2, Search UnitCe Mtg.: CONOTECI In. of SOund Path, Type: .' RG-174 Exam Batch 093M5.... No" ' Itt to L~ngt: 'P Z .Conn.*: 0
| |
| .-.... ..!...... Typo: ULTRAGEL II;" ' .... .an Coverage -.Mfg.: SONOTECH"CoI.'BloTco.
| |
| 50275 UpTtream, DMND4tree"m
| |
| [. San'-d. : 43-____________No.___.50275 Reference Block Th 'sa 0.631. Cie.: 48C CWO~ S!2andB: 49 Sws No- A0111=2'IitaL~kL~mp~
| |
| Tep. Tool: MCNDE401ii.
| |
| Exam Surfaoo .0 I'CslýDlkTimp 74'ToniType:
| |
| ROMPAII.T 4i S-, " Temp. Tool: MCNDEP0128.
| |
| -As Ground'Reecrdbblndhmaon(v):
| |
| Yes Q No & -;(Ir.Yes, Rot. Atlached Ultesonl IndICalon Report) -',e:R fu : ,*
| |
| * Accpt' Reject [ --" info ¶ ' .-" -"- Comments:
| |
| Pulýa ,pe tCaverage Obtained > 90%: __No _ _ Revwywd Previous Data: .Y_ s Ax.W Oienhtled RAfleot6F.
| |
| AnUtwtde % DWaln Chtinmhtenbl Oftiabtted Scaych Unit'CA~alfbei Signa 8"Op, sol Pe Rutlactr Ampltiudo DMWMio ID Ndfte go U M Rwferno./lznhmtor Block Gab:~ I~ Now Souixd Path 30.0 i .... I.20 .1 7.0 1 1.44 I I I I I I I :1 tos Width u 220 HS !r
| |
| -" UT Calibratior
| |
| 'amination.A#~ sitefunhit Oconee 1 1Procedure:
| |
| PDI.UJT.2 Outage No0.: 01-28 s" :.a Summary No.: O1.C,21I.0053 Proceduil Rev.; 8 Repor No.: UT-.1-785 Woks :,op': II" Work Order No.: ouoseav Page: 2 of 7 Coe .199IV2000A Cailtem: 'C.,.IJCS.21 Location: Drawing No.: 1-51A-02 Desc~ption:
| |
| Elbow to Valve IHP-134.ID 51A g,.!9olponet m 1A2-4/Lnt A Thiclme w/Dlameter.
| |
| 9S9.53114.0 , LlmbItaflo:
| |
| Volvo conflguratnon Stat Time: 1405 Finish Time: 14`17 Insrlnaiimnt 8ettings SerhUhCol.
| |
| TIM@ Date Axila sidentiaftd Sea-1 Unit, ,. seu No ,o14BL.C Serial No.: 00O0cC Checki sn atl a'OnaJ Sweep Un dPt ca I 1m 4 7 o, I cm aft to Jaw0 8, " .... pat Mauatror KRAUTKRAMER I'inBehrr
| |
| .'CA
| |
| * Initial Cal 1133 417MI etli Apfltde FA DIaha USN- ',00'" SW Size: cu. Ihk: ' ' hT Cal. WIN go &7 .8.4 S802 Range: 2.00 Froq. IMB MHz Sysl: Cemnp -a Inter. Cal. '1404 417211 7
| |
| .1230 Pulseir. .,' Exam Angle: 60 # of Elements:
| |
| Singlegr.
| |
| Cal.~DsIWOn 500 Reet %M~ H iCal* 16401 411712011 d I Rep. Rate: Autoahgh Freq.: 2.25 MHz Measured Angle: so Couplant _ _'" F.Fter: .' Fixed "Mode: PS Wedge Style: MSWQC Cal. Batoh: 0OalCni I ,v -ga-, "a 4. Other. Fullwve I Type.: ULTRAGELIT C Iga sweep -I Ax. GAM'(d):'
| |
| 35.7 dC.m Gain (dB) MIA Search Unit Cable Mfg.: SONOTEC Ralco AmPlItUde
| |
| % Divsin ifl PSen D-. -.2 In. of Sound Path , .Typ.: ,. .174 Ex'am Batch o. .WA '___"__:" "tesit Report No.: '"a L-11-140 t No. ...m,, _. .__. Type: ULTRAGELi 0i%ý soon~i Doa. 40" CW C( Sad:14A RfrNOE 6 1 ,.: ,j,.. .,.- ........, ' .. ... .....R. l.f"" ' '._ i I"' ,..._,. .' ... ScanCoverage
| |
| __,____,,,___.:______C
| |
| ,-. .. .Caflbration
| |
| -Block. .._C ', ,. -, 'N0, 5275 Upattrm r- Oowsream 10 Scan 0: -41.7 .CahL~ck -o6 -1"a;CW"'cnd NI-Gi o 8" on t ,. 74, lTamp. Tool: MCNOR40128 Exo Surface: O.0 ...... IIIZeIIIIII a y,- Tp..e ROMPAS .1 IPD. 4. ?A 11A4.fTemp. as Temp. Tool: MCNDE4OIS,-i4--
| |
| Suface Conditlon:
| |
| A.s o.und ,"'""-" '"" " , ___""__'__-'-____"______"'"_"__"_..
| |
| .. ._'_"_" Recorabletndlatlo~s~
| |
| 9~ ~Noff" (*If Yes. Ret. Attachd Ultrasonio Indication ReOWt.)a, Results: "Accept 0J Reject 10 17" -li 'ft Comments:
| |
| Pulse Width -w NS oPart e6t'.q!ovoraqg Obtained >- 90%: No ReowVd Prevloue Data.,,' .-'U PBI A f 0''A 1 / : -...
| |
| MW .,.AsiteUnit; 1~ Summary No.: Workaeope:
| |
| -0.UT Calibrationr
| |
| 'amination
| |
| -0.: , Oconee 1 1 01.CS.21.0053 tot Procedure:
| |
| Procedure Rev.: Work Order No.: PE14UT-I 9 01003607 Outage No.: O0126 Repot No.: UT-11-785 Page: 3 of 7 Cd:19=82000A CaLAtem: C-P-11C5.21 Location;,Dre&lri No. -S1A-02 Deaalptlon:
| |
| Elboew "t" Vale IP.134 10moejtI:
| |
| l1A-6k02.348
| |
| .Sie/Length:
| |
| WA ThIclumasalanieter~
| |
| 69,.531 14A.?1'duoa Valve cofculoation Start Time: 1410 Firdsh Time: .1430.-. ~'r% -." Instrument Settinan searih unitCalD SwNul o.:' , 014OLC .sea No.: 10-1205 Checks ,:MAnutt -r.- KRAUTKRAMER
| |
| .Manufaoturer RTC -rdURi -al 1216 4.Mo. -USMN4o Sw Size: 2(7XI0) Sh*: Ret. Inter. Cal.D ' ' Range: 2.O0 Freq.: 2,0Mz atwe: TRL2" Inter.CaI.
| |
| 1418 417120111:MVs dalIoi: .2273.. Pulort Squ"* Exam Angle: 00 #of Elements;:
| |
| d Inter.DCal.
| |
| ,1__, ____. "_, Reject % Final Cal 1645 -1712011 Rape Rt,.e: u.""AtohIh Freq.: 2 MHz .Measured Angle: " ' 0 Couplant F.Uper ,. Flixed .lode: Dual Wedos Syle: Integral Cal. Batch: 09325.-450 Other Fullwave Type: ULTRAOEL 11 Ax. GaX n ( .B)- 43,0 C4. Gain (dB): NIA Search Unit Cable Mfg.-. 8ONOTECH F" Swa8oen '- .2 in. of Sound Path Typ.- .---`174 Exam Satch 09325..-140 .1* -91h** , ,. 4o. C n .0 -Type: ULTRAGEL II C. * "at.. Stoc '., .Been Coverage , Mfg.: SONOTECH Cl Block No, 80275 Uptream r-Q Dowtom I Seen dE: 46.0 .... ...Cl. -996 1 , 8-T oi*t"- i "o '8, -Reference Block____.__1 ola.: 4, .5 CWQ CCWOLSaal.
| |
| dB: !5'S.tNo. " A"--,~al.B~k Temp, i4 remp. Tool: MCNDE40121 Exam Surface: 0.0. Type: ____u_._Comp Ternp. 68 : Te81.,,ool: CondItion: " As Ground -" Reccii(S619ndl1nde):
| |
| Yea Q No L -(If Yes-Rif. Atlched Ultrasonle Indication Reapnt.)Reaul.1a:
| |
| ' 'Aocapt Q 0 Reject I .'lnoj -'. Cornments:
| |
| Wic.P.peMIOf, Covae0btlained:90%:
| |
| No Revlewe.Prvlouaat.. , Y ..Axial Othmubed Search Unit.Cdlbralhn Signal Swcep .PO R.al.ote A 'hpftfde % 11 O nto 3 S4O'H to 3.9 .768.Celswallon 8IVAI s sAounp pt Rfeor AMPIltift O~vMMl.___.ftereeilm~,,uldw atemr a" "'Gain cm Am 30.0 1 L huUotJB lignl I~~epISoud Path.Bnat % .i ~~,..:.83 L "D1 It, 250 NS F LsatarRdbG4 M.-.10wNbe 0.cLvlI--;sIgnIftute
| |
| +wwlr .......rLsveI MIA , I ......._ _ + .... ..-.4 ,1'
| |
| * j''a.A.., PACE O1~ Ff DUKE POWER COMPANY ISI LIMITATION REPORT-0 1 Corfponent/Weld ID: 1-51A-02-34B Item No: 01.C5.21.0053 remarks: El NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION Upstream scan limited due to[ LIMITED SCAN [I 1 0 2 Z 1 [:] 2 E Cw (0 CCW valve configuration FROM L 0.0" to L 14.13 INCHES FROMWO ' CL to .85" ANGLE: El 0 N 45 E] 60 other FROM N/A DEG to N/A DEG Z NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION Upstream scan limited due to-- LIMITED SCAN El I 2 Z 1 r: 2 [1 cw E[ ccw valve configuration FROM L 0.0" to L 14.13" INCHES FROM WO 1.15" to Beyond .ANGLE: [ 0 Z 45 -0 60 other FROM N/A DEG to N/A DEG[ NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION Upstream scan limited due to El LIMITED SCAN El 1 I 2 1 1 El 2 R cw 91 ccw valve configuration FROM L 0.0" to L 14.13" INCHES FROM WO CL to Beyond ANGLE: [j 0 Eg 45 Z 60 other FROM NIA DEG to N/A DEG E-l NO SCAN r-- LIMITED SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION Eli I n2 nEILý[12[1CwE0CCw UT-1 1-785 FROM L ANGLE: to L 4 EO0 -l 5 Q160 0o INCHES FROM WO ,r__ FROM to Sketch(s) attached 0 yes[INo the DEG to DEG Prepared By: Robert Lester Date: 04/17/11 7 By: M1, 0I11 Suppleme.pA Report 9 Report No.: UT-11-785 Page: 5 of 7 Summary No.: Examiner: Examiner: Other: 01.C5.21.0053 Lester, Robert M.Foss, Steven .NIA Level: Il-N Level: li-N Level: NIA Reviewer: Site Review: ANII Review: 'baoa 01kV U -Date: 22-I1 Date: Date: Comments:
| |
| See pages 4 & 7 for limitations and coverage calculations.
| |
| Sketch or Photo: o) t, c., 21i, oo S3 1-51A-02-3q8 flpr&nr~tm.p Sc6AR ARF-A ON VAtVIE SIDE6 F.LaW V A Lv~I-- ----SI~
| |
| 7.Supplemes-Report Repor NO,: UT-..-78'.. Page: 6 of 7 Summary No.: 01'_._.211.00_3_.._________ Dar Examlfer Lostr Robart M. s , A 'l Date. P Iwn Vor Level: JIM Site Review: IvD'.. ..Other WA Level: NIA ANII R ~ ._el DIIIIa .Comments: Sketch or Photo: 0-.3 ,- r. +/-,.;....A
| |
| _ -' ,.S. ,.*4OF 4. .I""4....4.,4 ,. I. 4".... ... -- AtT"M~V;, :. ...A., O .4 .. ..4 ,4,. ... .....
| |
| SMMUM-P* S''1 Weld N~o. : --AA4MY-3 10: OU.5,21,0053, ZE dCE Mlow SI Elbow Si 4 Scale.: 1"= 1"% Coveirage Calculations
| |
| '4. ***j~. *,~ --... -, .--,sr.r... V.S1I=Elbow=
| |
| S2 Valve 100%46.1%S3 = CW= 50%(100% of the length x 100%.of the volueý)(100% of the length x 46.1% of the volume)(100% of thelength.
| |
| x-50%" of the volume)(100% of the length x 50% of the volume)=61.525 % Aggregate Coverage* ~..'r.<-S4 =CCW =20%Total= 246.1 / 4-I JnspAeAoA T:~:Z r~. Rage'-----~
| |
| --..-.. '"-t-Wt-..
| |
| Stle/Unit:
| |
| !V summovy No.: ', ,, Worksacpe:,'Code:~ 19981 Drawing No..SystemlO ,,: 61A SComnpomnontlD
| |
| -1; rr193-12.~., amitahed a UT Calibratior
| |
| %ination Oconee. II Procedure:
| |
| Procedure Rev.: Work Order No.: PDI-UT-2 01909633 Outsg Repe IsNo.: 01-28 wit No.: UT-11-677 Page: I of ,.ISl 4.I I I II.r ..: C eLl:tem: O-F-tlCe.21 P2 Desaription.
| |
| Toe to Valve I HP-216 Locaton:., % " ,,,, SitatTimeih:
| |
| NIA Th~cknaegsllamoter~
| |
| SSI63`11 4.0 Firfth Time: 1345*+ -In,,rument Settings Search Unit Cal. Time e*"i SealNo.: ..0140LC Serial No.: 0QVD?2 Checks ____ -". KRAUTKRAMER Muaurn " ..Initial Cal 0900 3130o/2 1' del. .... ... Si .05 Shape: Round n .Deli, 4.7600 Range: 1.i00b' Fro. 2.2'e MHz Style: Camp -o t. or Calm I 133 31301W2011.
| |
| * li CaI l: .'.1230 P -.ser Square Exam Angle: 45 # of Elements, ,in.le-. .F0nal Cal 1 5303130120111.Damplng:
| |
| * 0- 0 Mode: ,SHEAR , Rep.:Rate:, Autohlqh Freq.: 2.25 MHE Measured Angle: Couplanit l,, ar F'i," Mode: PEe te:, Cal. Batch: 0932.tA.;vVO'IggO:
| |
| ~.430 6ther. Fuliwavo Typo: .ULTRAO.L It JV 'Ax. Gal n (dB)l u 2.1 Clrc. Gain (dB): 27.1 BSearc Unlt dable- Mfg'.'. SQNOTEC'4 v'csr i.' 8l~t OfdPt Type: *R R-.174 Exa Bac 09325 , "" Unarl.-Repo itNo.:,. ..-L-11.140 ... L 6' C __ "_-_ Type: ULTRAGEL II... .. , ' .Scan Coveage
| |
| * M.,c Mfg.: SONOTECH WY' .~Calibration Block ________l,' " C .a i B toc kN o +. "4 ii02n"" 'foe l D o ti~atrea mrn [] S o& ndB P. ,1 ...-" , Cal' lo- ,No ___________________
| |
| .-- -',.--,:I M- Reference Block___________W ci, .40cGw@-ScondB.
| |
| 33.11 c ..knes..s. .£26 ........ c .w .., " -No.: 04.0741 73 Temp. Tool: MCNDE4013" Exam Surface: O.Ty'"- ....___ __________~Typer ROMPAS.-m P Te 1i8. Temp. Tool: MCNDE40135
| |
| -~ Sufface.CondloZon:
| |
| -As ground Reaotdenbloludlestlon(s):
| |
| Yes Q No2- (if Yea, Ref. Attached Ultrasonic Indication Report.)... .. ;, , ... + :,.t , -Reult: Accept -Reject *"nfo- .-.2., .Comments:
| |
| NIA, : .., , r.ot P I*.ovemg.
| |
| Obtained > 90%: h: , d reou, Dta:, *-._Ye. .. D o w-nnr- ~ ~ o~ ni II I I " .."I.at evee SIt,.'. I ' -'. * -" l-", ." ....". --.IJ.q"3-30/"2011
| |
| _____' ______' , -' -v. ... ___I~sLevl .144- .**~ ?~ ý.A-Ns 'Daba SiteRev4ew
| |
| ,, _lr_ i e i ..., / *, .. .. -.* .. ...D 1 I S P+ l w ..'' " r. U " ." :.. .%- +rm" Alm. l.l .,m .+. ..+ ...m 1, + ,: e * , -U-CAllratiori Ap0lleari Gl~ial Sweep Owjslson SourýPd P " ; -_________________
| |
| --~SeOAxII -R.hmne.ISlmutator Bloak-Shngl' 8wuePSoundPith d8 'Refledbor A-,=e Divtslon 20.2, 1' Radlus 80 8.7 .707.4.:I~eVeI HIM'.4.,.i1 t -O;-W i* -. ,.* ., At AC liME Hl'+ JF'14P o,.
| |
| UT Calibrat~iort v nto Site/UNit Oconee I I Procedure:
| |
| PDI-UT-2 Outage No.: 0--48 Summary No,: O1.C5.21.0051 Procedure Rev.: " Report No.. UT-14-077.-' Wofteope:
| |
| lei Work Order No.: 01900833 Page* 2 of 7 I" * :e -- +I,' t ' , ,,;, p. .r1 ---- ---* C~do: 199812000A CaUltom: C-F.-1C5.21 Locaton:* iI.'".' .. ..,- .+ ++.,Drawln,'qNo.:,.
| |
| I HP-193 Descripton:
| |
| Tee to Valve IHP-26 System.i1:'
| |
| 1A Component ID." 1HP-193-12 SlzeiLength:
| |
| N/A Thiclnoss)Diameter SSJ.5311 4.0 Lmittiaone:
| |
| Yes- See Attached Sheets Start'Time:
| |
| 0824. Finlh Time: 1057 Search Unit Cal. TimeL Date Axial Oriontated Search Unit 01-Serial o: .4BLC Serial No.: 01F UJS Cheolk CGwSIIO I 8 Maniufacturer~
| |
| KRAUTKRAMER Manufacturer
| |
| ~ KBA Ina a 34 4912011 Relet Aptds iiso Mode:'" .USN-0 SW Ske.:. .Shape: Round" Inter. Cal. *- -", 4 .4"37 Range: 1.$ Freq.: 2.25 Style: " latr. Ce 1001 4912....M', CaVI: .123 Pulver Squore Exam Angle: Go #of Elements:
| |
| Single inr,+Cal. " IJ_*_-D.smplng:.
| |
| 500 ReJect 0%.. Modse: Sher -.FnalCal 1157 4,,,,,,___,20111
| |
| -Rep. Rate: Auto,,gh Feq.: 2.25 MHz Measured Angle: so Coupant.-
| |
| "_ _ _.Filter" Fixed Mode: PE Wedge Style: MSWQC " Cal. Batch: 09216 Clrcumferentia Orientated Search Unit WHOaepr .Wo. Other Fu*twave Type: ULTRAGEL 1e , Pa Ax. q ,(db):' '41." Cro. Gain (d8): "MIA Searohi Unit Cab .. Mfg.: SONOTECH ______ _________
| |
| Division I- S'ren Dl.ý -15 In. o Sound Palth Type: RG -174 NZAEamBth 92* .4 .*. .~length. r Wo. Conn.: ..0...Tp: ULRGLI Llneir tRepoit No.:.....L-11-140 -Type: __________I i .;,. ..Seen Coverage Mfg.: SONOTECH Calibratlon Stack ____._* -I'Upstrea [a.m ScandB: 47.3* "Cal Block , -*027 Uc Reference Block RIIaa lea____2 _ 4.0_____ C8 CW carOB: N/A Gai Sweep Thcne, ; Dig. Cw ... ..... .74 Path., i + .,I serial No. .044d741lolo moht 1* Diiii cn al Temp' .73 Temp. Tool:k MCN0E40135' Exam Surface: Typ ROMPA8 41, NSI 45 4. .-8 .., omp.;le '. -07 Temp. Tool: -MCOE401S3 Surac Condition:
| |
| Asorid Gr , ec" ordablel tion~o} -Yes E NO E&, (if Yes, Ref. Attached Ultrasnlo adcaUon Report.)R... : ,-" R. 1.0 Comments:
| |
| NIA Accept Of Co g , > 0 .P...eougl-a.*
| |
| .Y, .', PeonlOfCovereoOgle l 90%: _ o_ ,. _____P__o____.
| |
| Yi +I i"i'I Exambier *Laverf il-t MjUirtisad.
| |
| BfrryAý.7t Other Date Date AIIACHMENI A PASE. 5OF/>*.'fr. , .. 4-,* :.* .:.i. t1.I. .. .'4 --4.-' -
| |
| UT Calbratlor Aination U ' W: SitelUnit.
| |
| Oconee .I Procedure:
| |
| PDI.T-2 Outage No.: 01.20 Summary No.: 014.5.21.0087 Procedure Rev.: B Report No.: UT-1t-i477
| |
| ; Worklcopo:
| |
| 181 Work Order No.: OIe633 Page: 3 'of 7 4. ..- .___"___________IIIIlll II__liI ilil__i_______
| |
| iiiI__I__I -19982000A
| |
| .CatJftom:
| |
| C-FiiC8g.21 Location: D"raing No.: IHP-493 Descriptlon:
| |
| Tee to Valve IHP-26 Syslem ID:, SI ,,Co.nonent ID: '1HP.1B3542 S1zalLwe&:
| |
| WA Thickneea/Dlameter 8851.5114.0
| |
| ',LtUIk:uu
| |
| .em 'Y See " atahed ahoata StaIt Time: 0812 Finrsh Time: 1059'.. -Col.uen Titmeg DCate Axial C~fated Search Unit* Seial NO.:'.,. 01413LC .Serial No.: 11-7 , Cheeks'" if " "*'' ..."t4 -
| |
| Sw SW'0- "bid Path SM "KRAKRFAER Manufacturer iitial Cal 0812 4.'2011'USNMod SI UStd-.- 2(4*14)1/4 .Shpep Reot. fnter.'Cal.
| |
| 3_ R o _80 0.149 Mom" Range: Frq.: 2.0 MHz -: TRL 2 Inter. Cal. '0944 41"1 -* ~~ae: 3 Plar gus Exam Angle., 70 #of Elements:
| |
| Dual n Co DampIng: 0o0. 'Reject 0% .Mode: ..o. .1059 Rep. Rate: Aut~hllh.
| |
| Freq.: 2.0 MHz Measured Angle: S0 COUpldnt_Filter. ; Fixed Mode: Dual Wedge Stl4: Intelrol Cal. Batch: 09320 Odmatated SBeob Untl Voltage' 450 00w, Fufiwave
| |
| * yp: IJTRAOEL 11 Oslbaloj path See i" ,Ax. GajnW(09):
| |
| 40.6 Chr. Gain (de) NIA -Searth UnItCabli Mfg.: 9ONOTECH Rfectol D"WI=n.. ..in Dt" -1 In of"oa U' -Type.WA", Sc vno:- *) ,,.of- 5nd~h' " pe: -R. 14 Exam Batch*. 09326 A.-, rityReport
| |
| ' 1 No. Lor ____140, Type: ULTRA0ELi-S'..Cal.l.rai"on,*
| |
| .iock Scan Coverage ,, ', Mfg.: SONOTECH_'. } dcNo. " ** Upstream Qi Goad dS:. 48.8' ..... _o -Stock__',__.___.____-___'____..
| |
| ... ..........
| |
| _______ ' , ,. [ .,- -- ' ' Refermne oo -o r,= lm d k Thickdos,, .520 1a.: , .4.0,' -. Ow E c Scan d,: .lA -, ,e,. Son a.~~ ~. el!No.: 627094409 ow dPt ik Cal. BkirTemp.
| |
| 73 'Temp. TooLt MCNDE4013--
| |
| Exam Sulsoe: O.D. .... W A "0.1 1 U IM!:oinpp.Tem 87 'r-Tomp..Took
| |
| .MCN"E45 Surface CandUilo:, 'As Ground ft!" ordabI*InvdIcadon(s):;
| |
| Yes 0 N..2 (if-Ye, Ref. Attached Ulkasorio Indiction Report)-ý,:- s, 0 Ro, d.0 _-. -.
| |
| .. .Commerts:
| |
| NIA .;,Results..
| |
| Accept Q +ee"" ""." "-" ... .. "*""4'.Pdro~tbf Coverage Obtained 2, Go%:!. No ReviewedPrevious Data:' Yes== .,x14nah:m", Law, d. 's D 4, Signature Date..,m,-,~ ,:R eve .."!r Date slid S:' ,atur cab..t MuIi'h ad, Sony A.. 4A191201 *( ther LeVOl NWA' *,Sgltr Date.I~~, i ~ , as WA I ""'-'~-519 a ., IuMr4afd4 5 V .. +/-1. J*,..'. * ~ 4~ 4 ... .,.. .-1~t1~-T I *AR in, 41.. .,
| |
| DUKE POWER COMPANY ISI LIMITATION REPORT Component/Weld ID: IHP-193-12 Item No: O1.C5.21.0057 remarks:.NO'SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION Due to cast stainless valve SMITEDSCAN 1 03 2 C 1 (g 2 0 cw 0ccw conwftgration.
| |
| F.ROM .. 0 to L 360: INCHES FROM WO CL to Beond-ANGLE' 000 45 060 other 70RL FROM 0.; 360 DEG' NO SCAN SURFACE: BEAM DIRECTION S..LIMITED SCAN E] 1 0 2 C] 1 L] 2 El cw 0 cow FROM L to L INCHES FROM WO to!ANGLE:, 0 045 060 other FROM DEG to DEG* 0 NoSCAN ,, .sUFC. ..." , :D IR IO N (2LIMiTEDSCAN 0 0 01.020 2w 0 cow".F'FROQM10 L-____._ to L INCHES FROM WO to ANG(LE: 0E,,Q ] 45 CQ -60 other -FROMe 'DEG to-- DEG!il osm' BEAM DJi*riog _____________
| |
| (40 NSCAN .1 ACE BADIETION 0 LLMITED SCAN 21 0, -1,0 2 E-_ cw _-__cw' UT__-_FROM L to L INCHES. FROM WO to Sketch(s) attached ANGLE: .000 45 0 60i other- .FROM DEGto.. DEG 0 yes -No fPreuBy-'
| |
| MtthewHessel " lWoei: Date: Sheet 4. of 7Lm~~evl- ."-Byi';:'
| |
| D ;
| |
| * e,:. * ...;Ins .. "-i:v.o'!(I AJ itt .LOA T'I* .. *~* .' .'-I.PAGE7 S upplamernaul Report~8umnar~tfý4 1MC.21.0057 EXhrfi ullaW..Kelth
| |
| -~Level: 111'Reviewer:
| |
| j if ~1Eaniher; .HassalWthwLeeI.it elw i-%/ A'. Level; Wk AN11 Review.4;!%,-,' Cdmment8:
| |
| Weld I HP-193-12 Cover~age
| |
| .1 7.(. .. iq 4'.k' 4A.Report No.: UT- 1-477 Page: 5 of 7-A AI .Date: (/. ii Date: b* m " ,Ill * "_ L I i./i I~ -.3.A bj. 'I A PAGE 7 X OFtf1Z
| |
| * .Supplemen-taIReport N..nei~~BuJ, .Kith Leel:* I-N' 'RevIewer:
| |
| h&er.-.MsselMatew8
| |
| ' LeveL lN IM Site Review: h-r NIA' ;' 'Level: WA *ANII Review': Report No.: UT-11-677 Page: 6 of 7 V Date:___oats.Date, ~6A, Vients.-Weid 1HP.193.12 Coverg 4 -. .-'4 6ktoor-Phdto:
| |
| ~ ~4A>3&. h '~ r--iI~J.I-V p..4 I 'I r 4.- '.t* 4 c ji.Y , .... ' * --4 .4*A It.4.4 L.&I t~~yALY ýAýPA 9E V a QF/4 Zg*
| |
| * I. .' **N '.ji.* p .
| |
| Determination of Percent Coverage for UT ExaminatiOns
| |
| -Pipe Site/Unit Oconee I I Procedure:
| |
| PDIlJT-2 Outage No.: 01-26 .,. "-Summary No.: 01.C5.21.0057 Procedure Rev.: E Report No.: UT-11-6"T Workscope:
| |
| iSI Work Order No.: 01009633 Page: 7 of 7 Scan I 100.000 % Length X 0.000 %volume oflength 1100 = 0.000 % total fbr Scan 1 Scan 2 100.000 % Length X 50.000 % volume of lengtho 1100 = 60.000 % total for Scan 2 Scan 3 100.000 % Length X 50.000 % volume of length 1100 -50.000 % total for Scan 3 Scan 4 100.000 % Length X 50.000 % volume of teongth 1100= 50.000 % total for Scan 4 Add totals and divide by # scans 37.500 *% total.for 45 deg ...... j-....."" .t .- ": "" " :" " " * ..(.-". " .-- .- ...-". ' : .. ..4.- ...Otherdea-..
| |
| .(tobeusedforeuppleýmentlsca
| |
| )Then data to be DiW d*6 b s for cveethat was not.obtaki w--tfte '4SC,.. ", Scan- ..L... .: -,, is o u.eofon, ..-..... -* %to.-f.r n : M..Do,:-. ;--" ;_ : .-*, .,. .:.*4;.': , : -... -.-' .' tt,.-:o .
| |
| ...
| |
| Sc$.an2 %Lntj--' .vtmofngt/0
| |
| ____%eaIrcn2-2 4'Scan3 % _ .% t. ' .-.-%volu .l,100-,-
| |
| -.. fr 3..q-i..p-
| |
| -..______-_ .:__ ._ ;.__ .-_..__._._.,__.
| |
| .__ ..__ .... .... ....; ..- -......t_.. o.... ..va !-- -,-V'co .eetcmet Ora- .IRP'J-,.
| |
| 44 d-; '""r:'c -" " '" '-."4.: '" " _ ". ...... ."' scan reqred ad dvideby 6U f scans to deter' .ne,%:Total forcompleta n .-. -: -". ..*2 .. ...-... w ..l. .* .. .."o .-. .... ... A ...*.. .. :.. .4** ;*4 ..; ..- .o-... .. .--....- , ..-.. .. ....., .; .....-*, .." -...-...----" " ' ' -... " ... -_. ...--.'-.: ..;.;.- --' ., .: -=. ;.- :.. ,: .... : ,..:;"M.
| |
| ¢1U +C , & * ' a , n , UT Calibratioi Wninatlon j -,o1 --Predure: PI,-UT-2 C. Procdýure Rev.: E.;: "181 b.. '.+'., +,' * ..vv0 Order rNo.:
| |
| * 019091587.'Kt. +, Ca,0tom ,ICS.2 ,+ .Loca,,on:... _77 ,-._, ' Descripio:
| |
| Valve 1P.-t03 to Pipe.'4 Stu+10 Outage No.: 01-26 Report No.: UT-11-670 Page: 1 of 8 I W/A Th~neas/Diameter 0A38 I3.W SS j;lT?.T~Exe Ii -6TInt~~I* I~lde: *. ~.: .~ ' JFinalICal 2M21201__________________Couplezit MealsurodAgi.
| |
| 4-~.wedge Style;11 +/-'o~ MUWQC. *: 'CW. Batch: .09329 4" T ype. UL1RAGE 11* 8.brcinlabe Mfg. ONIOTECII-'Exam Batch:- 09328.*.Lgi S'J N. Cnn. ~Type: ULTRAGEL 11~ -'Mfg. G ONOlECH~.ypafeam q7 OomtaV9eam0' dB:' 384~ Refereace Block-.0, , Ut Se. .0.0 04-874'~ I ype: ROMPAS Report.)'.-+,.,-.
| |
| ._,.Comments:
| |
| HIA I Data Date AJ1ACHIME~iA PAS E 9 UTi calibr'SitaUnIlt Oo. C* V~orkscopo.
| |
| ~11 atlor -ASnafion.
| |
| Pi66odure:
| |
| SPs'ocedureltev.:
| |
| aJ , Work'OrderNo.:
| |
| PDI-UT-2 Outage No.: 01.28 Report No.: UT-11?0 Page: 2 of 8 U 019g58?I II Ig l I I 2 1-51A-014, :.1.. taIV,- DascrIpton
| |
| 'ValvvA1HpO to9 Pip Location: 103A a-.SlzeJLength:
| |
| {i.i i in n : i , I.II r T1A Start Tie 1442 Thlclcneassjq~aeter 0.4381&.0189 Finlish Time:_ _a R- --4efa o Dat (Axial Orientated Search Unit Cambratelon Siga Sweoop So, Reflector
| |
| % DOvlon 10 Notch 80 4.9 Circumferential Odentetad Search Unit alibraUon Signal Swoop L Reflector Amplitude
| |
| %I DMAslon Me"aWed An l.'__________
| |
| COtiptant-Wedge Stile: msWOC ý ' Cal. Batch: 092* ~ Type:o ULTRAGELDI C-~ each ni CaleMIg. $6NOTEC14-f.pe "R17 Exam Batch. 09335 who.U 0 No. Conn.: ,. ,-4 Type LLTRAGELU
| |
| -*~~~ ~~ trqjramd541 SONOtECH -~AJ it'~ Reference Block -'Ecmm Wftoe' ' 0.0. d Type: ROMPAS _aSwfdow Conditon.
| |
| As Groujnd'4 (if Yea, Ret.;AUGMcIed Ultrasonic lIndication Rooo4)A'or a......ments:
| |
| NIA Ph '.>90%:.:':-'
| |
| I i I ia':,Leve~l a-IiN p.-a.-. C.7-2Izo11 IYeV!~wsr j~~~~SfgrwWe I. ,.~t I a-~j~jj7 ~j~V 4'7 .-~ a 4*0WI a .. 7.a' >Sl!8 ýDvl, w W" Signature Date_ , ,s" ,,,. ,'.' ° " Ill i irl i i m " i i " .i'% ~LOVS N/ ~. *. ~?4J~~giatim77 S, 1~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a i'..ANII viteow DsL~i i I m I I I m II I I
| |
| * ill -1lj!. V.~ A. -aw 41 U'V~~~1 PACE' A ' -.. a a-, .a at a a IV~OF U TCalibration WI ination' ' ,Procedure:
| |
| PDI-UT-2 I I I 0 Outage No.: 01-26 Report No.: UT-11-70" Page: 3 of 5 9.01609587 K~'I;~~ 198j2q0A *I~1~& *~ y'4~'t ~Ctiltm -~ ) ~P-l1C.21Location:
| |
| ~.; ~11-9i4) 3ý4. ,2;.J:.. : :'c' i ip~ 4 Dscd2lo¶~Va~v.1I~-
| |
| pe SlzelANgth:
| |
| WA Start Tlime: 1130 ThlcknessDlametei.
| |
| 0oA38/2.0/Ss Finish Time: 1200-s.....*1. *.I Cal. Time' Date Initial Cal, 0828 2/820111 Inter. Cal.Inter. Cal. 1008 2181W2011 Inter. Ce*ia Cal 1' 3 2J812o11 Axial Orientated S6arch Unit e -MSWQC : Cal. Satoht: .09328 Type: .ULTRAGELII chUttal Mfg.: SONOTECHl~RO14~T, ' Exam Batch: 92 No.Con. ~ i~~*Type.
| |
| ULTRAGELUIl 0.*oerag M~g.: ____________
| |
| 4;.~.*~j-Reference Block Seria W.: 04740-, TYPO: , ROMPAS Ai Gound,.~-
| |
| .-Calration signal Sweep sound Path Reflector Amplitude
| |
| % Division f.375 Notch go 2.1 me2.750 Natch 8o 4.1 1.03 1.250 Notch 80 6.8 1.701 Circumferantdal Orientated Search Unit Calibralion T signal Sweep L Raledor Amplitude
| |
| % Division Sound Path See Axila RafeancelSimulat" BSlock Gain ISignal Sweep Pat..dB Refector ljtupide %I DI)s~weoan1.*
| |
| _v 270 14" IIe~4hj.I go I 4.0 1 1.0 27 .... -R......I I 1 I* .-Comments:
| |
| N/A?RivIgwa~-Signature.eA .sts A*(ew I Signature Data signatur Date.:Le l NIA-. '" '." gnaturi -RAIM ~ ~ 7~~t '/i, Date f.~ 01 4-.P A GE. 5 OF / .1
| |
| °!'"i " SlllUnlLi..*,-
| |
| ;O
| |
| * ..' Sn,'1 ry No.: , 'o.: " Workscope:
| |
| ", _.i.UT.Calibratlor 0066 ,,. .. "
| |
| Rev.:., .:.. + -."Work OmerNo.: Wton P0iý-UT-2 9 Outage No.: ""ioge Reoirt NO.' UTo11-610 Page,: 4 -of .-24* .:. .~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ wi .... to. 'Location:
| |
| NIA Start Time: lini ThicknesulDlemeten 0C4381 3.0/SS Finish Time: t122 , .* !..... +_nsbum nt6et~ g# ....:, .. .1 S ear ch Unit Date...1..0',; eilH : "8 05 ..." Checks ," " ..; J., '.ap-"e-.
| |
| ...,' -- Inter. Cal.I K ""R k~: ; ... -L -,2:25*M z ..:- W :. Inter-.Cal .n 12oi;] 213)20t~* ". xa d ' Mo e ,E .1 ..'"? ..O' ,. " 7 Flxed, ".r .Fulwvaoix., , .., " "' ULlrRAGEL 11"- -- -- ,cUn. t Cable.. .f..: + 'k"T" " Olv.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~Ea -.: S. a"lp: -..... ch,14 , *':- 09326
| |
| ~~~~ .... WW::,,,.:+. m : r .No. Conn.; 114.: d;;i.': ~ _... ... + -o.1-43, *Ys UL RA E ,1,,-...-.
| |
| .... ..ye~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M~. ::. ,;. ..: ...+.,,+
| |
| .:_ JP DWT2& ""ihý 1 "d~a a ""1 Scan 'S ... .. .8. a:!,"s ~~c'e p. lr-,- T'601:E"xa.
| |
| pinim Surace t;", Z. -.':. .Too -,;j ,. , ",a.. na,,:luc ',id +- --. .Mj, ,. --mnt .W Fel s :R7 Pieep B S r ~ ~ lln.": ; -sO o n -. ta .6ý.. l W ,% ...... ,ow
| |
| ., AilOrientated Search Unit Reflectr Amplitude
| |
| % Division 375 00 1A .671 75 a tch.,,m Tip .'8 2.4 1.3511 1l.25 Notch so 5.0 ,,2.606 .*Ctrourmferentai Orientated Search Unit 1 I Love ..1, .",-, -07. ,
| |
| .. .. .
| |
| il~l'.."i
| |
| ',:: ".i ~ l i~i .,,+ .........I ." :.' +, ,,,.+, .,- +'._~~~~sgatr Date: ... r,. Level NIA: 1- "+Si+g+:'.:
| |
| natu'b, .-.+'" '" ' .' , +' * ' : % j', * " .+" t 110.""-....o + ... .,://, ,, .040....... .o. * ., .,...-, .1 .... ,, + ....-. ;..,,. := ,;; ++. ; ._e v lJ w A11ACHMENT A,
| |
| 7.1I I) J 0..... J m == lJ I I I==~DUKE 1 514LMTAI ioritlWeld ID: ý. 1-5: Nd':i NO SCAN ,, 4,-. BEAM DIRECTION'E2 5 "2 ff cw' ccw ICHES FROM WOj. CL to Beyond DEGto 360 DEG~4OSCA" , ~'~ s~fFAq,. E )a.BPMIREC IO LIMITED SCAN;4 0 ' 0 Icw____*oL~.
| |
| : INCHES FROM WO'. to 00~ 54 i'604 ot~r__ FROM ~'DEGt W ,"'0--ccw DEG iii m ii i I ISEAM DIRECTION D 0. V2 5 cw [3 ccw" HES FO & 'o .lI af I,,,,v Y*P 51 -i-ý l 00 Elw El ccw rIES FROM WO.".._ to ___+ F~p~*' 'Et -DEG.U"-1 1-"70 I Sketch(s) attached%A@ yes El.No.:-* ..*'**.~Jz;~*~., Sheet 5 .of-_ ~K, + ~ 1.* .,~ I',~,".~ ~'r ICO'" -jy ATIACHMENI eAGE1, 0 2 O'S
| |
| * V S J. g..Supp~m~JRpo~-I";I., Lej: lN Reviewer: Level 7. $1-N WW L r,; n .C. vel: toA ,A Rewiew:'a , rý;NI iwi or4 YI c1- I.A (i-rl Report No.: UT-I11870'
| |
| ~~ Date: Date., A t1" ~V .,.4,, 77, t I~jL~-f A~v'I d** .7""-'I I -'V 4.7¶.*7;*4.a 41 .ATIMAITH~PAGE o.
| |
| -~~upplemqixb~df Report-a, i- LG; fyevel 11-N Sit Reviewe:)trWA -fLexvel:
| |
| MIA ANli Review: Report No.: Page: UT-11-670 7 of 8 Date: Date: Date: '*h ~ *~* )aj;j 'j~',- a'/ e4~Ya-:..~. p,.~-, I~a(f It C-. 4*~. 4 *- c.~-~ *~*~V a j -a.~- ...I, J.if~ I .3*' ~J.,a ,~- .I 4 ~ ?~al .4 qa ,/.~t.4 4 i~ ~ a------ I~4 O.00ý4:ýez)
| |
| I.V. -~J"- ., I I III 41-'4'T AT TAt Determination of Percent Coverage for UT Examinations-Pipe Site/Unrc Oconee I I Procedure:
| |
| POI-UT-2 Outage No.: 01-26 Summary No.: 01 C5.21 ,006 Procedure Rev.: E Report No.: UT-L11-670 Woftscope:
| |
| IS Work Order No.: 01909587 Page: 8' of 8 Scan 1_% Length X % volume of length 100 = % total forScan I Scan 2 %LengthX % volume of lengthlIO10
| |
| -% total for Scan 2 Scan3 100.000 % LengthX 50.000 %volumeofiengib/100=
| |
| $0.000 % total for Scan 3 Scan 4 100.000 % Length X 50.000 % volume of length 1100 = 50.000, % total for Scan 4 Add totals and divide by # s6ans,= 50.000 %total for 45 deg.M, :-..-".x ..* ..-.,-.."*. * ,.° .o-.Other deog 6 (to beused forsupp emental scaqs) 'q p.-j .,r .-...The datamtote.lHsted.beis fo- cove-ag tha Ut was not obtainedwih...
| |
| te.45 deg scans.. .7_Scan21 100.o00 0bo- .,-,- ,0n.,om, a -Scan 3-.. ......% Lengthx; 0, 7'"'ýScan4 3, % %LsnthX--,--.;
| |
| ,-r~do-Ptotal.
| |
| fr Scan4 3 -.. .-_._._._°.
| |
| ___._:. .___ .-__ -___. .____. __. ___ .., ," ."_.._ , .-,.. ..... -. ..-.' , .- ___,-______"__"____..._
| |
| .- ; = ''-:dd'. totasca 4.reac-h-, sc.n
| |
| :i ....~ by -,~n t. deter. mnea= -, m:.;o = A,- : -.Sc -. ., -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.
| |
| ........" .-.. ..... ... : .. ,. ...". ... ..--". .. ." ' , " .7,' 7- 'E~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.
| |
| .... s .p o... ....... : ...,,.
| |
| .. ..., '..-. .: k .. 4r x %.''0_ _ .-i'e KY .;4. ,4 -__ ..." ., ..,, A!
| |
| is a .. .. '....::..
| |
| :.. .... t ...... "ftV' .-.'- ".. , .... ., .,.: : .., = .~~~ ~~. i .* ., : , , ,. , .J .-, : -....... %-Tta ax w r4" I~ ~ ~ St F.le. d S... u. m. w ..-s ...-.!-,j ' -. ..--..
| |
| .. *, apination Sital~~~n~tiU CalibrrlaOtaeto..onf
| |
| ,. Smmay No b"C~51050jPfoqedure e'_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Report No.: tJT-11-079 W Proo. ,* ., ' ' rk Order No. 01913780 Page: 1 l 9 9 L1g820 ODA ..1 FT CA__tam:__Location:
| |
| .~ ~ lPS503 ThPti IýD1tir PptVevilft!PS-022
| |
| '843-1 --'.~t~*'~ '4~ -~ -~' J .* -~Size/Length:
| |
| NIA Thlclczess/Dlameter.
| |
| CS-SSJON81.0
| |
| ~8e.mtah~dhet A~;'<..~i:
| |
| ~: *'** -StartTtmne:
| |
| 0910 Fnirsh Tlmo: 0048 C(l I-m Date: Axial Orientated Search Unit fVW1hwI I".. ' Chocks.____________________Col-o T -3 3131120111 Calibraen Signal Swep SOWmd Pai c'.KRATKR~iE~Wr.
| |
| A M 9 .-.*J -. In~al~l 7333131301' RefosAir AnlP~Ude%
| |
| D~isim* .~''.SNO4
| |
| .4~~;Sz: .,038 'Shp: Rud " *SO80-6.2
| |
| .789;0".. r, Fraq .intitr.Cal.
| |
| 0114 3131112011 W I. .~ w g_.___..4_
| |
| Couptmnt M~d~P'~wedesad
| |
| : MaQ... -0.Stc:~ 9325 Cfromtaftntluiffentatad Bombl Unit...___________-:,1,____
| |
| !.I --IT.Signal
| |
| : 0. e'fGat dS -.Mg: SN 'C Reflector-AI1P1IISdO%
| |
| DIVISlan P.11p..,!Sund G -IT4 e* Axial 4. .-..9'D1 ~ ~ ~ imr 7' iIt~ ' C ~ CW Scan dB-" 40*0:_________
| |
| *. ý , , 9'0 Serial rwr-Boc tj~PTot1 CNFiat 2 E m~rsc: 9, 4pý __ _ __ _ Ia~ III s a Sweep t qqhI M.CN1415jM
| |
| _ am ,.,*ce. ..~*, ~ ?,, 1 -1 SiJtr -Dat p -10 1.% N AW j -.4. .-~~'. .~UT Cairto 5 amfinaflor B7i5te/Un~iti Oc~on~gjA?;~
| |
| -Pioadure: Summry~o ' ~.~i~ii.@@0h~Prcedumi,Rey,:
| |
| Woilccope ha Work 0rder No.C~si)~ '* , 19981200QA 0:/Iem C. 5.5C1, I. OiqacdpUon:
| |
| PIPe to V6,1ve ILPS-022-1LPS-563
| |
| ý:. ..ti>4: '4z's.:':~~~' ~ B~ At~1flt~tii3Ir.
| |
| sftq&Wýnt I i. PDI.UT-10 01913790 0 Outage No.: 01.26 Report No,: UT-I1-676 Page: 2 of, 9 I I II I 10~~~ a, -~e .375 '. hape: Ij Rotwud IlfI' ýI* ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ A t~t;rq: 45M:- Sye'Cnp :inter. Cad. 0920 3/112011 1~4Ih'tJ~.Eam Ang~e:ý 1 890W U ' Emsit:ngle
| |
| __ -~ od. 4
| |
| * Sea Couplant (dB: < 4 1:1~,r Type: ULTRAGEL 11 065Ia Jni 86 9:* BNOTECI4~ Tye:~ ;,~"~HR174
| |
| ~ !Exm Batch '09325-I*T-' J~ Leg :Sh$.4 INCcnnl. ...'ye 4.., k t ULTRAGEL 1N t. Son'B:43 --__________
| |
| 2~ ,-- Iteforencs Block ikCvdN35kE4-,25 Exem'surface:
| |
| 0.. Ic ,!Tpe:. ROMPAD Aftce.lbtiiioi Indication Report.)'-
| |
| P -~ Comments:
| |
| Ini*u" .- .*''. "D to, SIgnature E5 I t.' I'in eirA *-2 ~Sgauv ..- 'Date WRaisw Signature W- J. (U,** .~*~~~~~ V4 J'I. ~,'m.. ..'.K''. I
| |
| %~44 .* mm * *Atiil cne r*UT.Calibration,..amination, " "'I, mOil;O r o.: -P01-UT-IO 01913700 Outage No.: 01-26 Report No.: UT-11-878 Page: 3 of 9 FinalCap 1148 3l3112011 45 Couplant-Intev ral!* Cal. Batch' 09)20 Circumferential Orientated Search Unit& .~ ~~ ~Type: 'ULTRAGEL It Cawraft"U 1' na Sweep ad4 Untiis t a I Mfg..+ SdNOTECII RaftftV Amnp"*dS Dvso PU1h.MG iO.74 *-'Eiim,8atch~
| |
| ej~T +yWe UIfTRELII.
| |
| in Ca-varipe
| |
| '.','Mf.:
| |
| S0N0.TECH--
| |
| tReference Block Isrne~tuwBc 4CCWWScawdb:
| |
| *Gdln I SWOO Pt-*dB- Rellee 4% OMBM~' ype: ROMPAS A? Radlust ft 0 +. 1A.'eQ.s round--4 .- -.;Uftas6,Md Indloatidn Report.)::.
| |
| -.I, Co m ns ntal.cl nX ~Ii.*17 A11~~aI'bE A.h ..'"
| |
| ~ X 1 LJT Callbr tio. am ntion~ i ~ DR9. .Procedure Rev.:*y 5~r~ ~ 4 i v ~ 1 ' W iOdrN.--0 SPD-UT-IO E Outage No.: O1-26 Report No.: UT.11-678 Page: 4 of 9...0-~.aijm I. .I., 1.-'* .Sei Serial No j -:1110 1* .. Couplant;Inegal Batc~h. -0326 Cfrcumtmrei ULTRAGEL 11 Callbraittm arot~ltab.
| |
| ~ d$f.:~1 SONoTEcH Refetior At~:.'R174 :: ''09326' /A _";1Exsm Batch _____'i~Jo.C~flf
| |
| ~ T : ~ ype: 'ULTRAGEL If CarlPVB¶U
| |
| ' ~Mfg.- 'SONOTECH
| |
| -fl'Iype
| |
| * OMA 29. 1Radius*~-~.*~ ~Commente:
| |
| InItlia SOntlonX(I Exam I.....................................
| |
| ~- I Da Ste RvsI Date Owte Data P A 6 F po F /4 Z,
| |
| , .~ UT Callbration.) .minatlon____________________
| |
| ~ Prcure: NDE-040 Outage No.: 01-26 PrIde e. Report No.: UT-11-678 Mi~ ~Wrk Order N'. 01913780 Pg:5o~fV ~,*.~ ta.V- rncI.1c.5, Location: wDa4g~ .r ' -ILPST563 -Description:
| |
| Pipe to Va~vlLP-022 f~op~fontO~
| |
| LP-5~.l4"'
| |
| b'' *.~ i,4'SixelLenuth:
| |
| NIA ThIckness/Olamoter.
| |
| CS-SSIO.515.0
| |
| ;Y' ~ .. .. .. >4 * ... Start Time: 00 Finish Time: 0910 Camltetns~
| |
| .~j. *,'~:*. 5. Ti aeAxicalOrlientated Search Unit No.: 0 IMBT.' ' 7'v SadalaNo.:
| |
| 1:87402%08724
| |
| ~~ ýf'Checks
| |
| -.F..- Callbiatimu sowa wo SudPt ,.anfatuar
| |
| ~ KAUKRME" l-'..Menu1ooturar:
| |
| "> KMA -~ ."Iftea 0730 313`112011 Soundm Path% M~l.Model: 'I 41:w:0 , Iz 3.GX10mm 'SFee: Rund' Inter ClBW 5 .5 sta.Ia .9.1350 Ra01e: 1 1.0 .. Froq.:' 4.0 Mix --t-Stl: W.EB -ne C 0905 313112011.44" I.,. C .- T..,-Final Cal 1.135. 31112011~Dap~n:L~..1K .Jot .%:~~Moe:...
| |
| ~ -ong, 77 SIRep~ae th f~req. 4.0 fyHj~34e-M;easured Ar~gei. o Cou plant' b~~d 'IMods' 'OiI< ) Wedge 8 W'4: -' ltga ~ ClBth 025Circumferential Orientated Search Unit~~aeLj ~ be! .______.-~J:
| |
| K't~ I I ' Type ULTRAGEL If Ceirio, Signal Swesep x.~1l~B).~8:~
| |
| CftO Gain (der~ Stir"-44
| |
| * Mg~SpOT Reflcto Ampl ude% olvislon S~dPt.1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c Unit~o Cable G :.R.N7 ,- -ExrBtc 535 7i 1.1 1-3.' -oh.. ~ *~ _________Cai.tl-TRlc Z, w ft nCiiii , Cocanfk' alvag ok go SONOTECN I ~,~Upfrea flDownslltdrna
| |
| ~'aI 500 o. .2'~ .. cun ~ ~ '- '4~'d i-,~Reference block. Rfiacfimlo lo-CNE415 Ui.*Ew'ulme .Serial No';:- .~, a 04-83 O Seo unti SiAsTr?. .?4.5jcnsp
| |
| _____________
| |
| E,. Typo ST.EP WEDGE 3f* stop 90 .5.0 .5 Tap-Ta: * :MCNDrzO1il 4 Oufc cd~¶--.A round. Type. .* ;"o U, 7.- nUJ V o1s, Ref.-Altacli Ultrasonic Indtcaton Report.R~,I~s7 ~,.,, 'poet 'i~R~ad'$
| |
| ~ ~ ~ "'.~v~i 1.~1 ~. .~..,.-Comments:
| |
| InitialISectlon'XlExam
| |
| ~y~1~!~9abtan 90% 74 E~imkiV%-
| |
| DatLe~ .,.... eiwr
| |
| * int Date Ye "A ..Sit* Re Signature 4ý4,'~''"lntm oe Alfeiw ''SgaueDate e*'~.* " 17 j". .~ 4.~ 4 4~4 4 4,.. ~I~IdII'I Il%-P ý / q,_
| |
| .tI.1,,.4 *DUIKIE rQWR COMPANY.t"... 4.'J ' Jl LIMITtO R EPORT.q...n5 1 Item No: ,01...5.51,.0050 NOS'N SURFAC' 'BE S SURFA E- BEAMDIRECTION LIMT.ED SCAN,. ."j4 ' E 0 i 0 1 E;V2 El cw n- ccw.! -' ., O,,_ .l .INCHES FROMWO L, to Beyond ,. , 45 ,Q 'er .FRO, N/AI:EEG to N/A DEG NOSCAN. SURFACE-,.*.
| |
| BEAM DIRECTION LIMITEC SCAN Eli 1 2 1 , Q02 cw, 0 ccw.; , ., " I:: " , t ., ,t -. , .....: : * -...0 V I.p"j."tFL;, oi>L.: .L , INCHES, FROM;WOa.
| |
| CL to Mo Elt, ,0'. ; 4- ,Q6.04;,the.
| |
| .FROM NIA 4 DEG to .N/A DEG LIMTEEDSCAN-
| |
| ;24 ( E. 14.-O2. 1 ow 0 cew M -.to.L, .. .: ".INCHES FROMW0, , -to _ _ _-,*other:;'
| |
| W2 E.E: 00' .E] O.[]45.,.016
| |
| .
| |
| .... "'FROM -'- "-';- DEG to, " DEG..,I ; ',SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION E] y0 w~ccw AINCHE FROM-WO to_ ___~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~..
| |
| ......... ..........--
| |
| .,. .*... ..,-,("/00 5other, Wto _ DE Q- Re o~t Sh eG, -, By.' ".',_..::
| |
| :., .. .... .' , ' ,' 2, , .; .' ... ii .' [:P -O3 31 1 I ..h st6-I WAC1tU A PAGEIfVF.14ý 4, 1~.+, I :, ., ; ...,, -* + ' .- 3 ... , 0 " ' ', I ', Supplemental RPport.,: -*, , .,. .:; '.',Report No.: UT-11I-OBT
| |
| ,. ... Page: 7 of 9;k..Dm.1,: tic d B ui- ., L + .N +. .,. s ,' R eview er ., m .: _ _ _-. ,.. , ., ..Da.e, siet OL.,e1 Review.., Revie w..L Date: 7414' '' "~ + ." ,",.., , .- ., ' .. t 4. ..+ ' ; -. ... '* ,: "". : ,. , '.5 "~tqfli 34'3 41* .. 3."4j4* :~' *'4' -'I "*~~~: 0. c'. *w t -i ~ , =
| |
| * 3 ,4. +*' A I~~~ '. -.4 .'x;4~; -~4 ,, E ~ JI* 333 .*~. *~* *.J .*1 33 3 3 , ~I.I I p'-I ~3 V I* ,* 3.~':.'~. 3,.*.4..4 I. -i.4 I II-.1. . 3 3 3 4 ... .~ *. r~j4~i 3 , 44$,. ~~r * ** * ,'. ~ , ~.'- :*.~ ~,, .3, I,..AIIACHMEEIA A-.PA6Ef, 3 OF Supplemei Report Report No.: UT-11-678 Page: 8 of 9 Date: I~S~f~sDate:
| |
| -Date: Summary No.: O1.CE.51.0050 Examiner.
| |
| Murhtad, ".nyA. _ , Level: l1-N Examiner.
| |
| Dean, Steven Level: 11-Other: NIA Level: NIA Reviewer: Site Revlew: ANI Review.Comments:
| |
| Weld 1LP8S-63-14 Coverage 0 Sketch or Photo: s,-V'dvC -s1.Io'L qts G, 0.e4dJt.Aju 4 c.actr('sd q/7 7 0 D296.Determination of Percent Coverage f UT Examinations-Pipe Site/Unit:
| |
| Oconee i I Summary No.: O1.C5.51.0050 Workscope:
| |
| ISI Procedure:
| |
| Procedure Rev.: Work Order No.: P0I-UT-10 E 01913780 or Outage No.: 01-26 Report No.: UT-1t-678 Page: 9 of 9 Scan 1" Scan 2 Scan 3 Scan 4% Length X % volume of length 1 100 %,total for Scan 1% Length X %volumeof length/ 100 = % total for Scan 2 100.000, % Length X;:- -~.00.0 % volume of length 1100 = 50.000 % total for Scan 3 100.000 % Length X 50.000 % volume of length / 100 = 50.000 % total for Scan 4 Add totals and divide by # scans = 50.000 % total for 45 deg 6 Other dea -60 (to be used for supplemental scant)The data to be listed below is for coverage that was not obtained with the 45 deg scans.Scan I Scan 2 Scan 3 Scan 4 100.000 % Length X 50.000 % volume of length / 100 =100.000 % Lengoh X 0.000 % volume of length 1 100 =% Length X % volume of length 1100 =% Length X % volume of length I 100 =50.000 % total for Scan 1 0.000 % total for Scan 2% total for Scan 3% total for Scan 4 Percent comnplete coverage Add totals for each scan required and divde by # of scans to determine; 37.500 % Total for complete exam She Field Supervisor Site~~~~ Fil9uprior7 ae Date: Y/_I Z& Of/
| |
| 0 M Site/Unit:
| |
| Summary No.: Workscope:
| |
| UT Calibration, .amination Oconee I I Oi.C5.51.0053 IS'Procedure:
| |
| Procedure Rev.: Work Order No.: PDI-UT-10 E 011213756 Outage No.: 01-28 Report No.: UT-11.-TO page: I of 9 Code: 1998/2000A Catjltem:
| |
| C-F-21C5.51 Location: Drawing No.: iLPS-702
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| | |
| Pipe to Valve ILPSW-16 (Cast SS)System ID: 14B Component ID: ILP8-702-50 Size/Length:
| |
| NIA ThicknesslDlameter 8S-CSIO.S/8.0 Umlatoiona:
| |
| Yea -See attached sheet Start Time: 0057 Finish Time: 1035 instrument Settings, Search Unit ; : -.: ....Cal. Time Date Axial Orlontatod Search Unit Serial No.: 0 11M BT Serial No.: 011CXD Checks Il a naSo d Manufacturer.
| |
| KRAUTKRAMER Manufacturer KBA Initial Cal 0735 3131r2011 Reilector Amplitude
| |
| % Divi Sound ath Model: USN-60 Size: 0.375 Shape: Round Inter. Cal. SDH s0 5.2 .788 Oelay, 5.7450 Range: 1.5 Freq.: 1.8 MHz Style: Comp. G inter. Cal. 0957 313112011 MV Ca/al: .1288 Pulsen High Exam Angle: 45 # of Elements:
| |
| Single Inter. Cal. ---Damping: 1K RaJect 0% Mode: Shear FnalCml 1140 3n1I2011 Rap. Rate: Autohlgh Freq.: 2.0 MHz Measured Angle; 45 Couplant _Filter .Fixed Mode: PE Wedge Style: MSWQC Cal. Batch: 09325 Circumferential Orientated Search Unit Voltage. Fixed Other- Fullwave Type: ULTRAGEL It Calibration Signal Swoop Sound Path Ax. GaIn (dB): 39.0 Ciro. Gain (dB): 39.0 Search Unit Cable Mfg.: SONOTECH Reflector Amplitude V6 Division I Screen Div. n '15 In. of Sound Path Type: RG -174 Exam Batch 09323 Seo Axial Linearity ReWoo No.: L-111-139 Length: 6' No. Conn.: 0 Type: ULTRAGEL It Calibration Block Scan Coverage Mfg.: SOROTECH Cal. Block No. 89-4287 Upstream C3 Downstream R Scan dB: 40 Reference Block Reference/Simulator Block Thickness 4" Di.: Flat CW @ CCW W1 Scan dB: 40 Serial No.: 89.3259 Gain i Sgnal SWO Sound Path-_____________
| |
| dB Rellootor lAmplitude
| |
| %/ DMivson SudPt Cal. BIt. Temp. 74.5 Temp. Tool: MCNOE40135 Exam Surfeae: O.D. Type: ROMPAS 21.7 1" Radius 80 6.6 1.0 Camp. Temp. 68 Temp. Tool: MCNO040135 Surface Condition:
| |
| As Ground Recordabla IndIcation(a):
| |
| Yes C] No j] (If Yes, Ref. Attached Ultrasonic Indication Report)Reault: Accept Q Reject 0 info 0 Comments:
| |
| Initial Section Xl Exam Perocnt Of Coverage Obtained > 90%: No Reviewed Previous Data: No-Examiner Level f- Signature Date Ravi /I F Signature Date Mulred, Barry. 3/31/2011
| |
| /.12.exermnier Level 11- Signature Data Site Review Signature Dt Dean, stavan : ýOther Level NIA Signature Date AiSIl wna e ture Data NIA C 1AMWI A PAGE] 6 0 Of Z 4i 1~3 IJ~.~i.J'a I I',. ~..,UT Callbratloi
| |
| -...amninatlon' SH~lurf Pcocedure:
| |
| ____ ____ ____ __No,:_ ProcedUTRevRo.:
| |
| PD~I-UT-10 Outage No.: 01-28 Reporl No.: UT-11-870 Page: 2 of 9 01 913756 P*l.I IIII i ysytem I~ ~ "1998J009Acat~ftem: "CF2JS5 Location: rjo.:4.4? , LPS-02 *'. DescrIptlon:;
| |
| Pipe to Valve 1LPSW.16 (Cast 3S)D* 413 * *4, .~j. 3*SlzAeLength:
| |
| NIA *Start flme: O987 ThicknessJD~ameter~
| |
| SS.CSIO.518.0 Finish Time: 1015-"'Y asi.ttched 8 heests:.w~I
| |
| * inst Irament.Betting.'
| |
| ."iSac Ui Cal. rs af-1MT' Whit SlaNo. 1-: :10M1V. Checks le~ KRqAUTKRAAIBRt`
| |
| M"andtutwer, ' L -JA Initial Ca 1 0740 313112011~~~~b Iu -'-f hl84~,."~i-~sr
| |
| .3@ 3 isape. 'Round, Inlter. Cal.- __~ ~ .506 Friti.:72~2, 51 AZ 3.am"t 'Q.. ~COMO. v! -Inter. Cal. 1005 =1112011________ Fulser. .-Hih 9*! Exam Angie: Od 4I ~of. Elenments:
| |
| Sinai:. Cal'.~11K____ ___________
| |
| Moe, ! Sh ar431 3173112011
| |
| :Auoih Freq.: .2.0O MHz, 73J Manumed-Anals:
| |
| * ~ 4 4Couplalt 121164'ed Mode:,- pt, I~ Wedge WONleJ. MSWQC .Cal. Batch: 09325 F~xe' otie. puw~&~~:, '- .'...Type:
| |
| ULTRAGEL 11 442. C.r.4. Gain (dB) 'LIjA 1 .sach-4nit eible Mfg.: .SONOTECH art Div. 16 ~2~itof. -S*GUfid P8Mth`. Types I P!1 %~..RG.-i74 I >~.EwB 92 4.., 4.. 3. No.onn: '.0... 'TYPO: ULTRAGELI1I
| |
| __________________________________:~~
| |
| '-36325. ~ Uptiwm 0. ~Reference Block_____ IZ'Q7A' ~2W.~A t'i~. .~ Scan dB: 'NIA -etio:.,~845 emp.7. V epTo _ __ _ .' ROMPAS~Temp; Toui .4 MNEO3\ Surface-Condltlomrh
| |
| ,:- As Ground~ m onsJ -~. v.:~.N ~ (it-Yest;L~shdUluoi In~dkiaion Repa: ';4. ,4Commrenrts:
| |
| mIt~*Ra a ra vt 0 , ...Coverage'Obtahud~9OI WN~' , 1 ewed P a iois, ORt:.Axial Orientated Search Unit, Cebrion §inal. 8we.p Sound Path-Re~hctot Amplitue 0I 1 08$aon mrSeD," "8o 3.4 -.16"-,,,+.. T -I. .1 Circumfarantlal Orientated Searot Unft caflb~ftr 1i9e Sw o pi nd Patth WIA , kftefran.lmlatorU19 Block"6,4 1l.adhs 80 1.0/.ast Sect~on XI Examn-* .~ :tsmgntue
| |
| ~ Dal''I. .~.. 4 A11AMERAfl A.PA&E/i72F/.0
| |
| ,0350Wh..U T & ý ib zi j o .-.a m 'In a tio n .j ~ Pmcedut: PDl-UT.10 31:510033_
| |
| j J., $ ,Proosdula F.av.: 18 '*0' Order o.: 01913750' ~~COUtdtin" C-F7;1*q5.;1 Locailon: Des *~o,!Pipe'toi~altv ILPBW-l6.(Caat 88)J SeLzal~ngth:
| |
| Sa ~hUn t s 'Cl i*m Date 0 Outage No.: 01-26 Report No.: UT-t 1479 Page: 3 of I*NIA Thlckness$Dlameter~
| |
| 38-C8IO.51i.0 rxfo)-4-., -3hv*. RioL.I iir oI I P hiar. Col. 401S 313112011i
| |
| ~' 48 *ofiltmonbCal.
| |
| -7 ) .nl l 1,148 313112011'~ ~ A Intgral i Col. satchi: I 0932 ,, :, ~ uLTRAGEL If L4arh".4411 Casl to Mfg.- SONOTECH 4R17 Examm atch .02325: ocnn. * :.Type, U6LTRAckLi.1 0o~ntm~i~
| |
| ~Sn~B: ~ " eferance Block 0.0~~ -.~!IROMPAi inche Ukibsonio lndiUalln Repokr)* comments:
| |
| mnit 1 rasRvaiI..IK 4 hJ~lall ~ -'- '~J~f..I Acoapt R *' C.5 -ýJ Mpo Obtane N,0: .___fal Section X1 Exam!M AIA~A PAGE/f/QVF,/
| |
| 2 mu TCal ibratlor 1..amnto-...ve Nj'iii1 ' rcdure: PVI.UT-10.,Sum7vryAl
| |
| ¶~1 .51 Proedre Rkev.: Outage No.: .01-26 Report No.: UT.11.679 Page: 4 of 0*. ...L, P.OscStln P7 toIil'Viv LPSW'-16 (Cast 5S)* ~ M .. e/Lengtt: I Sheets' *;Jj~;~*~ji
| |
| ! :j~ ~ ~ ~ .7' semz~q.tinit
| |
| : j. Inter Cal.4-1 ; 60 Cuplant 3r LX1 Batchi: 09325 Circumfawo ifTye: ULTRAGELII MntCal j ý'.-: PSONOTECH RAfte~tw Al ROITA ItVExim Batch *025 it9nn ~ T)e ULTRAGEL II~ov~age ~ .i, Mg.:. 'SONOTECH:
| |
| .t , l- -f. Roferenea block, No,. '~. 86289 dB Raftleotr.....__._.__ ._._ T ROMPS.~~~~~~I .j K'Comments:
| |
| initial Section XI Exam pt.I; ho dtial Qrlentated Search Unit S~flfi Swep I04~nd oath rnieGAmulMm Blook-, ,, I..812M. 191"ap Ai,4 IW.A. 2L MA.Vým go j I.11 ---Signature Date.9.Signature Date'-' Dat, tý&4w 0-wo Dft" , I ,I 'j.9-~ ~F ~4., 1*..Al I A E-RER I PASEff q fi
| |
| .~. ~UT Calibrait siteIUnit:
| |
| Oconee Wol*poope'
| |
| ..* : Ion, aamipation ProcedOur:
| |
| 0 NDE-640 Piocedtm IRe v.: WorkcOrdei No.: S Outage No.: 01-26 Report No.: UT411-679 Page: 5 of I 01913756 tý *1 C -;tie Jiilf-P 5 Location.-
| |
| .4 IP.02 ~ ocp~u:Pipoto Yatve iLPSW-16(as
| |
| ~ .. .,*Size/ength:
| |
| WEA ThidcknessDiarneter SS-CSIOVISA Inhirwitent~rm Detnate.Src ni m Axial Orientatod Search UnIt U. II, ~,a No. 8462-09724
| |
| .Cek --Sl--'rKR U IC A ER '~"P M nuaIu r K A ~'70 5I27 iaReflet "r slo S W Bound Path'A'5 Ur' KR40MU,' ..SyAe MID Initer. Cal 0736 313112011.
| |
| j-SHGO ~ ~ ~ lz 5X1m Mt~a.. Rud 1i-littr.
| |
| CaL DUT 8 31 R-ng. --~V 9)&~hg~f Fuq ~ H iExr~ ngo:, j ,#ofl mna.Da Inter. Cal.'-., rh iT h 1 ' Reec.....0 s&-,N-Mdg
| |
| 'Lng Final Cal 111351 313`1120111.
| |
| ~¶Ti.5 oe~ M~~~~jL~a~d nl .I7~2 Couplant _____ ____-v Ti :ntegre......a 7ad: 092 ClrOumferential Orientated Search Unit_____________Typo ULTRAGEL" Soun Pathe, ~ nl Sw~ *' b --j: Reflctor' Aqpfltuds Othtlon uF'I Gan(dB) 38 -io an(B.38.0 3&0 C- Stmifh Lni Cpýe Mg SONOTECH ;-In. 8ound at r 4T .-, ,:'Exam Batch: 09325.8c San, Caveage ,~ 't SONOTECI4, ____________________
| |
| amm~~~n SdB'0 3'~ tf ne.1slsmtditor Stock.* ! 'maT '. cnReferance Block- ". -s 86d.. ;-'.Sral No. ':. 04.763 ýathom A~ie ~vs J~~snps~5ep, Toolý P MCND)U40I i ji epeTontldSTEP-WEDO
| |
| .1A7 i,- ___:*___e*V"')
| |
| s "ufce 97 .i o60.~~e~~~o~~4sbI~~~~
| |
| 16~ains) Y efAtce Indice teo.Rp'Or--
| |
| ~ ~' Rejct ~. t ~ ..~ .~ ;: ~ .,'iComments:
| |
| Initial SectinXI Exam N, 1 : tTýnDataSigntur Dale..5 -. S' 3 Eiwmkn ff! .O~ i .Dat -`''l/3I Z1.i q,4, Sla 5 Ir Date 311.q~OteN IA 0...,. ~ gaueReiw~~~
| |
| ivi_0.1. AlI Date 4'.fA f .~ 1/4V,5 .. ..47 Al I A~W~ A
| |
| ýj''2'4.:,''~:;~ I a, ,~ ~h ilta 0 .0 I ~* '~p1'-~.4, .,' 0'-IPO.AWECOMPOANYN EPR¶I§X LIIAT-TON RIEPORTýI*n "U J&b ,. 1LS .O25, Lte -. ' '_ No.-': ., 0 F 004 :4 0'"" 4 ..- " ;FROM'w S"CAN '' "ýTEdSC EAM~ DIRECTION , cw [ cew N/IA':',EG to 'N/A DEG t I m .+-..'NO-SCAN" vlA- L t161 -IgIRECTIO.N'
| |
| +cwý ccw ,,DEG to DEG EAWID20 TINCQc NjO 4.*w .0~DEG ~DEG'.LT-11479+ :- m*Sketch(s) attached E yes+;,4 I -Fats: C ~ jj-*~' a-i-Sheet 6 of M1AtM ER'1 I
| |
| :"'$uplemina ReortReport N~o.: UT-114679' ., i :> V.*. Page: 7 of 9* ~ " -. jU, .f-,-Muiriwad Barny-A. ~V~- ~ Lvl I- etwr______________
| |
| Date:SL/1
| |
| /an E. vo ". " .7N Site Review Date:p.. I A : ."' , .: n A ; : 't ." .-' ,Lv .I J I
| |
| * l ." i e _ _ _ _ _, R e p o rt .N o ,: U T -t t ..6 7 9 D a t e.., .A -"" ; * "0'Profile of Weldl lPS-T0,240
| |
| ~4x ";.., ......t I" ": ., * "t , .J ..*' ; ..--P g : 7 o.4 5,.9 -.. .. ..,. .. '.: , ." A, ." , .i,.tl¥ t:r ' ' ''- ÷ ' , *;,. .7 4 " '. -'A.44 nrýn~S4n H T s-I. .L I , L ;f'V! ,e. t 1 ....A .i .' , : :, ."t"i -:,4""
| |
| * 4 * " ' I""i " " -"* 5--. S,.S :. ; ." ..:',:,"..,* ... .)4 ',., ,I¶. : ' r I: U.; .-i " I'' ..r.i J -r.I .... ..., .. .... -" ....,... .. ..;. 4 ,'- 4'
| |
| * PAG. .E"; ..' , 0%,/i.., II I',.. i--SI '<'
| |
| Supplemlea Report Repori No.: UT..i1679 Page: B of 9 Sumry No.: OI.Cs.5.0053cL.l.-
| |
| R : -/Examin-- Mu-rhead.
| |
| ByA. Nm She Leview Date: E~~fllf~f' Dean Steven Level: ~ St ~VS oe Exaner D Level: NIA ANSI Review,.Comments:
| |
| Weld 1LPS-702-50 Coverage Sketch or Photo/4.1ve -'t. " Ow &,de*.k 06.L I .d"/,/7 fL Determination of Percent Coverage for e UT Examinatons*-
| |
| Pipe SiteInIt Oconee I I Procedure:
| |
| PlD17UT-10 Outage No-. 01-26 Summary No.: O1.CS.5.0053 Procedure Rev.: EReport No.: UT-11-879 Woftwccpa 181 Work Order No.: 01913758 Page: 9 of 9 Scani I iLength X % .volume of lengthl1100
| |
| % total for San I Sca2 ______%Length X %__ _ %volumzeof lengthllIa=
| |
| -.. %total forScan 2 Scan 3 `100.000 % Length X 50.000 % volume of langth1100 50.000 % totalfr Scan 3 Scan 4 100.000 % Length X 50.000 % volume of jangthI100 50.000.. % total fr-Scan 4.#Addtotals and"lleysvs 50.00 ODD -diileigscnm
| |
| %toalfor45d C -7 7 Th 6 dat to be* Mad__ paof.. isWt&vsii c--f he4- c Scr4 -.100.0 e%_____..tnarvan~i~
| |
| ___________~temff MOD,=_~"-
| |
| _~ .~-r Wt %An.z~ ~ .Lt,,-, sc-a.n, -Ad by t jt..j, w?wt.. T*4..-.1-
| |
| -_- 1 ".-'-I.ý --i_4
| |
| * , a* ..UT Vessel Examinatio~n S)MIlft., 0"con0 1 0.Procedure:
| |
| AIDEJOIC Outage No.: W/A Summary No.:,W3 ~ .Procedure Rev. Report No.: BOP-UT-09-112
| |
| * * .Workacoom.U.........
| |
| Wok Ordor No.: @168357 Page: 1 Of 4 Cod*- 19s*JIOSOA Catittom:., 844JS36 Location:
| |
| WA q DinViMo. Na UO114e..
| |
| * scriplon Chemiclo connector to chanrwef body System ID: WA*60Cmoonen't I0 W.3 SlZO/LeeIGt MIA Thlckneaa/Olamteta
| |
| .6Tf/8.0SS LkvitalonSI Yea, -.3 #00 eai"I~stnnlJ hot statn~tme:
| |
| 1035 FWnis Time: 1105*UAWudt~:
| |
| Inside (J s diiad swttfe~ConcidLio As GO Lo Lociatin:
| |
| ~
| |
| * WO Lýýouoeo:
| |
| Ccuth fW Couplant:
| |
| ULMAGEL II Batch No.: Q2 Temp. Tool Mfg.:. PISH!R Serial No... MON" 02M7 Surface Temp.: TO Cal, Report No.: al nA ýAngloUsed 0 .,46' 45T,. 6;;9.' t~ 1 scatnnin do 43.0 StY *01 IS 46.0 Indication(O) yet 18 'Moo ;cwi Coiterage:
| |
| Uipstream D ownstream 0 CWGJ COW fi Cormmonis:
| |
| * Scanning db lowered Orom.*14dbi bonanai 2:1 aligmtna led to Results: Accopi (Jl RuedXwlneaon SIN N-32300. FC W9-0. MO0*Percent Of Cover~ag Obtained i SM0%:7TY RevAewtd Pevious Data, No I i.1 I 4.1 I .-ATTIACHMENTI f PA4G E), 1 p 0f 4 9 811e/Untt son.4.oDufm Ultrasonic Indication Report., Procedure:
| |
| N0546 0 0WJ44 Procedure Rev.: +op6C., ..-Work OderNo.: o015357/ I Sumnary No.: Workscope:
| |
| Outage No.: NIA Report No.: BOP.UT.09-1112-Page, 2 of 4.1 Ie q Search Unit Angle:. 457 CIA We Location:
| |
| Cenau0n 122 Weld Lo Location:
| |
| 1..o Piping Welds o Feniic Veessls x' 2T@ Other Vessels < 2" 1W 2....11 MP .Mtel Patm Wm" ..istamnce From Wo ToL8.U. Maximum Response RBR Remaining Back Retlectl,-
| |
| Wi ji ,.ance From We At L 01 Max (Forward).2mFromDatum,...
| |
| ,..W Ditwhee From Wo. Of Max(Forward) l",9nmnfle W"lt WA.A1 -i. / Al-' ? i i" l-am-.4--affm La if 13 El W WrAw vi.1 Ind"oatbi
| |
| % '"WI .50CSWI ,I L 1. RBR Remarks Angie No. Of Max ' Of Maxi o OiM Max of Amp.DAC W, ,U-MP WI' MP 'W2 UP Max Max'1 1o 21.14 WA WA WA WAL 3W I -i0_" IN. WA ItootOwn,*,,-,-'- .- ..+ .." ... .82 2.5W T 70 0. 1.20 WkA' WA M-WA VA 4W '0.' IN? MIA Reet Coomety 82 3.70' 50 iig ' 2.30 1 W It/A WA. N;A2 30 04 II, WA LD niw--.. W .W; W 92 441.69777 A 3O +"ITMARo eir-, -t o -* : .'" 9 ., ". I +Examiner Level t1u14 Date Re ir.w 'Signature Date... .,A,"I + .,e,.DateSiteReviw Sinatue Date_ r_._-_ _l~_ _ _ _ _ _V_ _"_-_s_ _, u teI Wk.,mdM ,= W ¢] i?*+; .. * ;i 92$* .,. 4:....1.' ,.Al 't NW.¶ A?
| |
| *0 DUKE POWER COMPANY ISI, LIMITATION REPORT Component/Weld ID: WJ-32 Item No: BOP-UT-09-112 remarks: 0 NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION Due to nozzle.C LIMITED SCAN 01 02 01 2 0 cw 9 ccw FROM L 0+3" to L C03" INCHES FROM WO CL+1.1 to Beyond ANGLE: 0 0 0 45 []60 other 70 FROM 0 ' DEG to 360 DEG O NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION Taper on chemical connector LIMITED SCAN , 1 02 21 c2 w Cw ow FROM L N/A to L, N/A INCHES FROM WO +0.6 to +1.5 ANGLE: ,0 N045 0o60 other 70 FROM 0, DEGto 360 DEG O NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION UMITEDSCAN
| |
| [ 1. 0 2 [02 1 Q 2 E- cw 0 ccw FROM L to L. INCHES FROM WO _ to ANGLE: 0 0 0 45 '60 other: FROM DEGto -DEG 0 NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION QLIMITED SCAN 1 0 2 0 1 Q 2 O cw [I ccw FROM L to L 'INCHES FROM WO to Sketch(s) attached 4 ANGLE: [10 [0 5 r 0,60 other FROM -DEG to DEG yes No R. Vl.wO d By: ,.Autho I"Date. 1 d 8tveea o u T 411AtLIjj A P AG E/ Fr6Z!
| |
| w5 k anoval- '' '. uplm fW flower.Re" ~ ~~ ~ ~ .4 :- .. , I, *: ,` N -6 rii' *fi onth L-.Srae 2.~ VV W &.4~~owf a :?temlctl~j j 41 .U v: tL j t? t5'Lv.. ~~~~S' g,, 'Z ~~. .~ -' -.. , :':;.. ~ ,~ ~~.~~ ~ 4 *' ,~ h 1A~4- 4 4.oft No.: BOP-UT4.-112 Page: 4 of 4 Date: Di :Ir..4.
| |
| Let DOwn Cooler -Chei necrto Channl..B.dy
| |
| % Coverage Calculations Weld No.: WJ- 32 O= 8.62r" t O=.87" WeldLewgth 27.1w TotaW Inhped Area- 223 sq. I..% Leong% Umited due h ton n 27.1" x i00 =22.1%Acareat Conaao CalMcton.7 # Ki". -b. volum.A7 ..... ._ .... -+ 7 .!x c*rh 78 a %-3 -4'w.Ax.! ...... ......., ..-2.% feg x 6S h~ lm olnt/0 ,2 ,% +i+' +. .'-.,~ --......÷ ,-77-C.'~~~. .......... ...-. .... .. ... .. ... .... ...... ........ * ...* ... .....- ,+... ... +,;o.. ....1 071*npector I Daft'6 ,"
| |
| *Letdown Cooler Chemical Cornnector to Channel Body Total Exan Area 0 Weld No.: WJ-32 ItemNo.: N/A Chemical Conictur -Si I aomel Body -S2 I Scale: I"=III&4f
| |
| *Letdown Cooler Chemical Connector to Channel Body Area e Axial Scans Weld No.: WJ-32 Item No. : N/A=AreaNot Examined = 0.05 +0.01 =0.06 sq.in=Area Eamined= 2.2 8-0.06/2.28x 100=97.4%Chemical Conector -SI chanl Body -S2 45*600 Scale: 1" = 1" O# ,
| |
| OLetdown Cooler Chemical to Chanel'Body Area E amie @ Nozzle -Axial Scans Weld No.: WJ-32 ItemNo. : N/A= Area Not Examined = 0.05 + 0.01 + 0.02 = 0.08 sq. in.LIII=Area Examined = 2.28 -0.08 / 2.28 x 100 = 96.5%I 0.05 sq.in.0.02 sq. in 700 Chemical Conntor -SI 450 60 4 -701 450 cQannl Body -s2 Scale: 1" = 1" 177ý#YL AýlwlfE / 1 Z Letdown Cooler Chemical Connfector to Channel Body Area Examined -Circ. Scan Weld No.: WJ-32 Item No. : N/A=Area Not Examined = 0.5 sq. in.=AreaExamnined=
| |
| 2.28-0.5/2.28x100=78.1%
| |
| LIZ I 450 450 Scale: 1" = 1V A -rl#c 4''' .: I gr 15_
| |
| UT Base Met amination SitelUnit:
| |
| Oconee / 0 Procedure:
| |
| NDE-640 Outage No.: N/A Summary No.: WJ.33 Procedure Rev.: 5 Report No.: BOP-UT-094113 Workscope:
| |
| PSI Work Order No,: 01889357 Page: 1 of 2 Code: NIA Cat./ltem:
| |
| NA Location:
| |
| N/A Drawing No.: NIA
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| | |
| N/A System ID: N/A Component ID: WJ-33 Size/Length:
| |
| NIA Thickness/Diameter:
| |
| .875/3.OISS Limitations:
| |
| None Start Time: 0825 Finish Time: 0829 Examination Surface: inside [ Outside W/ Surface Condition:
| |
| AS GROUND Lo Location:
| |
| 9.1.1.1 Wo Location:
| |
| Centertlne of Weld Couplant:
| |
| ULTRAGEL II Batch No.: 09125 Temp. Tool Mfg.: FISHER Serial No.: MCNDE32770 Surface Temp.: 70 OF Scanning dB: 47.0 Cal. Report No.: CAL-09-457
| |
| % Amplitude Position One Position Max Position Two " mnd.Loss --. --.-.Remarks No.Back Wall Full Screen Li W1 W2 MIP LM W1 W2 MP 12 W1 W2 MP NRI Comments:
| |
| N/A Results: Accept [ Reject C] Info PSI exam _9/I ./ -2 Z3 ;'9- (Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%: Yes Reviewed Previous Data: No 96..S Supplemental Report Report No.: BOP.UT-09-113 Page: 2 of 2 Summary No.: WJ-33 Examiner:
| |
| Dean, Steven Examiner:
| |
| Griebe,, David M.Other: N/A Level: Il-N Level: Il-N Level: N/A Reviewer: Site Review: ANII Review:.Date: Date: Date:_,,-Comments:
| |
| WJ-33 52.9A/iV~c.J6~D5-'A/ozaLZ7 ro 9-0 Site/Unit:
| |
| Oconee / 0 Summary No.: WJ-33 Workscope:
| |
| PSI U UT Vessel Examination 0 Procedure:
| |
| Procedure Rev.: Work Order No.: NDE-3630 1 01889357 Outage No.: N/A Report No.: BOP-UT-09-117 Page: 1 of 2 Code: 199812000A CaL/Item:
| |
| B-DiB3.150 Location:
| |
| WA Drawing No.: NU.D-1149-1 Rev. A
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| | |
| Nozzle to channel body System ID: N/A Component ID: WJ-33 SizelLength:
| |
| NIA ThicknesslDiameter-
| |
| .87513.OISS Limitations.
| |
| Yes -See supplemental sheet Start Time: 0952 Finish Time: 1010 Examination Surface: Inside [ Outside [] Surface Condition:
| |
| AS GROUND Lo Location:
| |
| 9.1.1.1 Wo Location:
| |
| Centerline of Weld Couplant:
| |
| ULTRAGEL II Batch No.: 09125 Temp. Tool Mfg.: FISHER Serial No,: MCNDE32770 Surface Temp.: 70 F Cal. Report No.: ow 6" //-'Y-'0 CAL-09-458, 459, 460, 461& 462 AngieUsed 0 4 4 45T I -ft -4H- 70L Scanning dB 43.0 61i.1 50.2 55.0 46.0 Indication(s):
| |
| Yes C] No [] Scan Coverage:
| |
| Upstream to Downstream
| |
| [] CW W CCW 66 Comments: Scanning db lowered from +14db to maintain 2:1 signal to noise ratio Results: Accept F) Reject 21 Info E) PSI examination
| |
| ..3/,/ A, -.Z ... :-/ s-.., c1i .c'-Percent Of Coverage Obtained > 90%: No 54.6% Reviewed Previous Data: No C'AkV7J¶L%
| |
| Examiner Level II.N Signature Date Reviewer Signature Date Dean, Steven 1114/2009
| |
| , Examiner Level II.JNin Date Site Review VSignature Date GrIebel, David M. 111412009 1I Other Level N/A " Signature Date AN?4iI4eview Signature Date NIA f~t~c tlgeT~9M V/-a 11 DUKE POWER COMPANY ISI LIMITATION REPORT ComponentlWeld ID: WJ-33 Item No: BOP-UT-09-117 remarks: J NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION Due to nozzle.E" LIMITED SCAN F" 1 2 1 Z 2 E- cw E' ccw FROM L N/A to L N/A INCHES FROM WO Toe to Beyond ANGLE: [3 0 0 45 0 60 other 70 FROM 0 DEG to 360 DEG l NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION E- LIMITED SCAN EC1 5] 2 l1 2 l cw E- ccw FROM L to L INCHES FROM WO to ANGLE: 53 0 [] 45 5] 60 other FROM DEG to DEG El- NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION n LIMITED SCAN l1 5 2 1 -] 2Elcw 0 ccw FROM L to L INCHES FROM WO to ANGLE: 5 0 F5 45 [] 60 other FROM DEG to DEG El NO SCAN SURFACE BEAM DIRECTION r- LIMITED SCAN 51 52 E [] 2[cw ccw FROM L to L INCHES FROM WO to Sketch(s) attached 4 [R yes E-] No ANGLE: []00[ 5 0]60 other __ FROM DEG to DEG Prpae B:Steve Dean /ee:I ae 1041097 Sheet 2 of 2 Reviewed A / Date: "oie nsnct -5S2ý.... .i m & 2 2,A .- ' a t .._ ..,,, wlwliýýlf 13 ?,ýre 14ý Z, i Letdown Cooler Nozzle to Channel Body Weld No. WJ-33 Base Material Coverage Scan Radius View NonmRadius View Axial 68.2% 52.7%Circ 652% 54.4%Aggregate
| |
| @ 68.2 + 52.7 + 65.2 + 54.4 = 240.5/4 = 60.1%"_Weld Material Coverage Scan Radius View Non-Radcius View Axial-Si 45.9% ..26.0M Axial-S2 0.0% .0.00%Circ-S2 94.1% 66.3%Circ-S2 94.1% 66.3%Aggregate
| |
| @ 45.9 + 26.0 + 0.0 + 0.0 + 94.1 + 66.3 + 94.1 + 66.3 392.7/8"=
| |
| 49.1%Total Aggregate
| |
| @ 6.0.1 + 49.1 = 109.2/2 = 54.6%Level Ill T Af4 Date /1I V- o'14 0.Letdown Cooler Nozzic to Channel Body Weld No.: ;Item No. : oJIA sAA1~JAL 1EUjff.AF I 2~-~~JtI T) A(~AEA or- T J~LLL~ -S~E~L. 7- .77F~~~=Channel Body-Si C Scaic: "= 1" ,~ /37/~1 2s-T Letdown Cooler Nozzf to Channel Body Weld No. w-5-33 Item No. .JI, z/Jfr-In --Y7,,1 go-I\WE5L I ,/z J I IChannel .Body -S I Scale: I" 9 li0 7, Vr 4' 0 Letdown Cooler Nozzt- to Channel Body Weld No.: --:3.:Item No. : A/,A ilfiiA~2~coR r~~~!f: (-, .L Nozzle SS2 C: 4- 4 A Sy~ ~ t(,,ý 7 ( z'. 'V Z 1Z I I Channel Body -S I CO Scale: I" 1" e Xlý OZ q cf.
| |
| Letdown CooJ r.Nozzle to Channel Body,( Radius 0 View').I Weld No.
| |
| * YZ-33 Item No. :,,,I/-a ". ~gk .~,, -.q,z-r, .I t oIL 4?-. .... .... .... .. ._ _ .' 0 7 * .7-Lý, C', 14f-z 0 6~C-Vo ,40-fA "&L3L$Q Scale: 1'"= 1"/'bZ <Ilol 0 0 Lefdown Nozzle to Cha~ihel Body ( Radius View')0 t/I!ld No.: W3AJ-33 Item No. : ,Vl/7~&< &A~('f~l~ (C~ZA-T f-Oi /~I A%J/) CaO\/ýACrfý AVI/L izLqsý) n if .-A _ E .,z I djA--~ ~ .6 74. -'-7 4 C-ttl AC, 0 7z, Ln3ýL/.zScale: I"= I"/ r374z-~ 6 0 F 7
| |
| *-tuown Coo1or Nozzle to ChaA-,ei Body ( Radius View c 0 Weld No. " -_33 Item No. : AM/A I BA CcxIt3C* ('c C*q..~ 2O~"--7-U, 0/.7 C-,c r R?5 Tx,'~.1~/ *\-. -_________kJ Yý0 Scale: V''= I"///-'~Te/9'7'/t 76 Vessel Examination I 1 ul Summary No,:' *Wj 4s Workscope:
| |
| S Proedwe: NOFE-3630 Procedure Roy' I Work Order No, 011393117 Outgge No.: NIA Report No.: BOP-UT.00-t19 Page. I of 4 Coda, leen o Cetiftem: .D8.1Locatn".l WA Drawing No.: NU-0-I 140.1 ROV. A
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| | |
| Chemical co .wcWo to channelI body system ID:, NIA C~omponanr ID: Wj3 ieLfgh AThlcknessiDiameter AMA=8.10 Limitations: ,Yoe -'Sao suppoinem tsl shteet Start Time: 1107 FMsIh Time: 1130 Examination Surface: Inside 0 Outside Lo Location:
| |
| I.,.. 'Wo Location: Temp. Too) Mfg. FS .R ,.-eraNo.:
| |
| Col. Report No.: Angle Used 45 46T* Scanning dB 8J1-~.'?W.
| |
| e .50..,a0 Indioation(e):
| |
| Yea s No Q Comments: Scanning db lowered from:,÷4dblto inaIntahn 2:1 algn tonc Resuls: Accept Reject , Info (j Perent Of Covdraqu Obtained > 90%: No.-087.7%
| |
| Surface Condition:
| |
| M A1 Ctaulldine of Weld 143u00 IICNBE32770
| |
| &_45.40c .460, 461 & 402 Couptant; ULTRAGEI.
| |
| I Surface Tamp.: 70 O Batch No.: 03126 m II B Scan Coverage:
| |
| Upsteam Downstream 1 CW @ CCW [la* ratio Pal exanmnatgon SIN NM-23i -1 IC 09-01.0 940o Revlewed Pravious Dala: .No AT1Acrnk, A 44...44 Wo ocw;..Vs "m AP. Me. Po bA7 7 4~~~~~ -.55~1 nA~-~..W~Loc.~
| |
| Af Ulson ic In~kaibain Rqport.~on~f'~~..t0
| |
| -':'ed~: NDE-3830-, ;., !;:~~11 ~ Work*OdrfrNo.:
| |
| I0195*~~' 889357.'.
| |
| 1 Outage No.: WA Report No.: BOP-U,-W9119 1 Page: 2 of 4 I I I I ..I. _ I l I Fen ti -es l r' T , cl va -W.4 1' r.* 4.1 DW 1,,..ri 7. A", .mvsnir 2 ~' 4-2'f4 ATTACI!MEN1 A P A 6 /1%4 F, 1 4Z_.4 4.N 14.1-.5 ..I..5 4[*. .4'r 4S4j~4.q~5.44.4~ 'd~'~55'4 4 45 )45.~54~.5 -S 4 I 0 S 0:;4~:~D~4I~PWER.4:cQMPAN 181~~ L11FA1INPRIORT'-
| |
| Cornpqnont1Wejd'IDij WJ,-35 41 _- ; .Item No:: BOP-IJT-09 119 remarks:-NO SCAN .!'SURE BEAM DIRECTION Du.tonozze.
| |
| EJ LIMITEDSCAN
| |
| * ..1 .2 01. 2 0cw ccwm" " .. .~. 54' " *I*.I' t 'Ji " :' FROM L .0+3P toL: .3. ,jNCHESFROMWo,, CLO 1 toI 'Beyond..ANGLE:,* 0.0145 i-"1-1 Gt 60 DEG-; [] NO SCAN .Uf _F A , .BE .DJR CTION .Taperonchemical
| |
| ; -"LIM ITrD SCAN , -.; ' .- , -. .' .2 -' , -1 .e 2 , cw r@ caw , connetor.FROM L'. NlA to ..N/A I .C.' FROMWO. +0.6 to +1.5 ANGLE:' '0 q 6, 0 9hr7O ROM; DEG to 38 DEG;;Jz "r, I i i 0,5 MC;: -EMDIETO LIMIT ED ECAN -. ..'FOM L , ...,' ' : ".INTCHES FROMWO .to ANGLE:- 00 0. 450'.0 .othDr.FROM DEGto -DEt'I oNO'SCAN~i , LIMITED SCAN:";FROML. .L4o ANGLE:, " 0 5,~E.j: 2~j.. ~1 6tAm DIRECTION E3 DJ2'';cw 0 ccw F~O Iý DEG to 'DEC-'4 i 4 .I, 7i.7 Sketch(s) attached!.yes.- ENo Pri'eii'wd By: Sheiet 3 of 4'[A41o.i.e ftwl f V( .::~ W , rp C, i i 4. f A I IAt 1IHE11 /j i!i
| |
| .wumrAt No.; W4 I. ., I P,ar A .,~i 2 RepodNo.:
| |
| UNp.Ur-W,-li P~op: 4 of 4 DOC.* .l.:
| |
| # .... -_Lot flni Ccb -Cheical Conak Cha~uwal fl-to'k- ca% Coverane Calculatons a Weld No..: WJ- 35 0= 8.62r" S.= 0.87rr 27.1-" .Weld Leig =Totd al pectlo Ame t2.Usq. hi.%LengthLhbvddstminozzi-6'127.l~x 100.22.%--ni-a' 7-*u o lo -...-3 c¶.q Aegnbcveqq~abcee:21475-72 ...-.* ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ý 7".* -. J'C. ''t~.t , ~-. .+/-3. -.... 4. .-.J. -~ Aq-'..... -, F.. .a.-* .... ..-.-' ..e-.. .-* ..'" ..., ., ' .; ,4**/,'%'o9 Pag.jof.1~V--~-r-*- '-t. ..-'4$~-'t.'r4
| |
| *',.-..* .... -. ...-Ut.
| |
| Letdown Cooler Chemical Confector to Channel Body Total Exam Area 0 Weld No.: WJ-35 ItemNo.: N/A Scale: 1" = 1" Letdown Cooler Chemical Conffector to Channel Body Area Examined-Axial Scans 0 Wed No.: W WJ-35 Item No.: , N/A=AmaNot Exauhied=
| |
| .05 +O0.01 =0.06 sq. in.LII=Area Exatnined
| |
| -2.28-O0.06
| |
| /2.28 x100 =97.4%Chemnical Connecto -SI chamnnl Body -S2 60'Scale: I1IT= It ad~~~~/ 1+/- )ý6 ~
| |
| p I Letdown Cooler Chemical Connector to Channel Body Area Examined @ Nozzle -Axial Scans Weld No.: WJ.-35 Item No. : ,,N/A IZ3=Area Not Examined=
| |
| 0.05 + 0.01 + 0.02 = 0.08 sq. in.=Area Exained = 2.28 -0.08/2.28 x 100 = 96.5%0.05 s,. in.I 0.01 sqi. I 0.02 sq. in 450 60P 450 70" Chemical Connector
| |
| -SI cinel Body -S2 Scale: 1", = 1" Letdown Cooler Chemical Contector to Channel Body Area Examined-UCirc.
| |
| Scan 0 Weld No.: WJ-35 Item No. : N/A-=Area Not Examnined
| |
| = 0.5 sq. in.Ei'- Area Examined=2.28 -0.5 / 2.28 x 100 = 78.1%I 450 450 Scale: 1" = 1I/A 0 SIteJUnit Oconee / 0 Summary No.: WJ-38 Wofkscope:
| |
| PSI UT Vessel Examination Procedure:
| |
| Procedure Rev.: Work Order No.: NDE-3630 1 01889357 Outage No.: NIA Report No.: BOP-UT-f9-1120 Page: 1 of 2 Code: 1198W2000A Cat.ltem:
| |
| B.DIBS.160 Location:
| |
| N/A Drawing No.: NU-O-1 149-1 Rev. A
| |
| | |
| == Description:==
| |
| | |
| Nozzle to channel body System ID: N/A Component ID: WJ-4 SizefLength:
| |
| NIA Thickneas/Dlameter.
| |
| .87513.0138 Limitations:
| |
| Yes -See supplemfntal sheet Start Time: 1012 Finish Time: 1034 Examination Sur#oce: inside Outside v Surface Condition:
| |
| AS GROUND Lo Location:
| |
| 9.1.1.1 Wo Location:
| |
| Centerine of Weld Couplant:
| |
| ULTRAGEL II Batch No.: 09126 Temp. Tool Mfg.: PISHER Serial No.: MCNDE32770 Surface Temp.: 70 OF Cal. Report No.: ;,"h 4'-. 09' CAL-09,458, 459,4e046,1&
| |
| 482 ev. eýcL-Ang&eUsed 0 0 I 45 I 45T .40- I 701.Scanning dB 43.0 01. 50.2i 515.0 140.0 Indication(s):
| |
| Yes No a: Scan Coverage:
| |
| Upstream ý# Downstream v CW V CCW Comments: Scanning db lowered from 414db to maintain 2:1 signal to noise ratio Reuulta Accept ý. Reject he Info Percent Of Coverage Obtainedt
| |
| > 90%: No -*W-PSI examination S-4/A -8?-/vc- OLI-01 CA-0s;Reviewed Previous Date: 0ý- 'i (-t-1 i's t IExaminer Level U-N- Oats Reviev,. Signature Date Dean, Steven : 1114/2009 Examiner Level U.N .4igne Date Site Review Signature Date Odebel, David bL. 11/4/2009 r Other Level NIA Signature Date A -1lnatu / .Date A'%.ATI JA C~~ 00
| |
| -1N .4 .1ý A Al V Component/Weld 1':, ._W-3 04" tm o BP-TO-20 ..marks: NOMTE SCAN '6149 IP~~ .~".ý .q pDN*-FROM L! WA-- toW ý,N/A 4; -.NS -FROM.~Te",o ANGLE: ~ ~ r~Z F~~OM~O~'.ýDEGto;360 -DEG________________
| |
| NO SCAN SRAE7BEAM DIRECTION
| |
| __________
| |
| * 0 LIJM1TEDSCA C1 A. -.02 0 0,2 0o o FROML __ tL'tIN E"S'FROMWO, 't _ _jR$~t., :DEG_______
| |
| 0 LIMIED~qANV
| |
| ; 4- 414 -0"2%QMjt 1 2 0ow1/4 'M'.UM.I&ITED SQ. N.~ __ _ _ _A4 47 o o ~ ~ROM'~DE~t DEG 0ysE~* ~~ .4f AN.GLE' M. DEG t DEG 1/7 T R44 -'AK' r i2 L Letdown Cooler Nozzle to Channel Body Weld No. WI-36 Base Material Coverage 3~)"Sca n .",'Radius View .. .Non-R~adius V)iew. ..Axial ...60.% ...52.7%Circ , 65.2% 54.4%Aggregate
| |
| @ 68.2 + 52.7 + 65.2 + 54.4 '= 240.5/4 = 60.1%... .. .... ....Weld Material Coverage Scan Radius View Non-Radius View Axial-Si 45.9% 26.0%Axial-S2 0.0% 0.0%Circ-S2 94.1% 66.3%..Circ-S2 94.1% 66.3%Aggregate
| |
| @ 45.9 + 26.0 + 0.0 + 0.0 + 94,1 + 66.3 + 94A. + 66.3 392.7/8 =-49.1%Total Aggregate
| |
| @ 60.1 + 49.1 = 109.2/2 .= 54:6%Level III ___Date (-109 41:j 14Q7
| |
| : 1. I W I4..44.. :.j 04I V .Le*w Chf.1e B I a~o.: ____... 4,.'~~1 * ~.I:J ~. L¶ ~ *'*l 4~4.) 4'4 4 I (4' Total Exar 2' ~ I.41 4 4.. V 4.. ..I,.4.4,.. 4 ~4:4.".. *~~*4 J,.,.,. ~ j4 2,*,'~*,*-,<*j
| |
| *s* *~~ 4'~4 ~d*~'2.I.4.1 i,4444.*a .-.,.*.*'S*1' '~~'
| |
| * 44* 'V...i ,."I.2"4 4'1 ~' .1.$44 ~4 4~4i.1-'... 1 444 (~ 4. 44'4 a i I I ,'4.4,,. 4..4...'.'. .(4".i p!4u 14 "I4 4.4 2.~I~? ,)> *4.,4>.~4~4~4 A? 4'.. F' -.*r.4*** 41 -* ~ ,.' 1~-. *.~.***~~'*'4.~*'4 S~~1e.- 1 ~4 ii V 4~ 2-'. V'V 4'p. .4* " 'f4 14.4F,.4
| |
| * 4 444~ ~ .4'4-, 4 I,*I4~~ ,' A P A 4 F 7, S 7 W d No.:., ." ,, ..I,.* I .1 '47 -71 T N6e Nt Channel Bo x i d .2c.:Scan.s., I, .... .4..40 2lsqn,.".21 1..72' x 100.= 55.5%* *o
| |
| * l ... *j .4, I. : 2, .,44'. * ' ;, "" .' ' " ' '.I7 a,.. ..: ...-' .,, .P,. ...0...,;dy n No.: _ __-'4-4 450 41*-444 I.P l I,* , ". .t~4..J-. .4,4 ~444 1. ...~!,"~ ~,1 ~14.F\iN\I: 'S...I.;..., ' 7 450 A11ACHME~P A E/58"DIsF u~4-h V 1 ~4 1II, .., 450450 I`45-0 ts AIW ,im 3 *4:z Id o Letd* ....; , , ,...... :r ''., i ': ' ' ' .1! Body--,,- I*1"IR*1..Ar a-nodt Item Nc II W A II.Lre~ Exaid 49 42- 7ýO '45.Zu/o ozzle K SS2~~1C.I,.It-lr~lei .450......700 6500 A) 1ACNM1)4I A I.'A"I (A A -* /4 Letdown Cooler Noz;ze to Cha'nnel Body (Radius View)WeIdNo.: , Item No.: _ jA 4 Total Exam Area 2.30 sq. in..Scale: V': P"AtCH~l PAB/~ ~/ZA t.
| |
| ~etd'own C,.C IlA a re (Radius View, it4 em No.: 4 Ii 4.f1 Oi.....30...I; X,.t Ii-700 6.00.I I'I 1*450 q i °~ .~> -~I. ~.. .,...L~< , ~pnnoJ Body SI, 1.I.Scale: 1" = V" 151"*1 AITA HKEN I '.
| |
| | |
| C 1 anne1 Body Radius Vie AeaExamined-Cir Scans* ., .T:,. A- ,, Weld No,.:¢Item iV. ;* I*1 LII 4n Are , not Exm'i'.ed
| |
| * 0;.-42 sq.in Area Examine4 3,03 -0.42 /2.30 x 100= 81.7%450**I 4 1 I.4, g i 450-, 41')..4 ~VAAt1P1~r
| |
| ~ £. .i 'a-- -i~f.,. t~ * .1 a I* *-*- *, ..* a* ., *. 'a-.- .. I ~I-~:, ~**~ 1 VL-~ *I
| |
| * 1'Chann~el Body'SI I'I.Scale: V =It* ' ..PAGF/6Z OF ' Z.i, i}}
| |
